There is no stigma for a runner who strains a muscle, or a pro athlete who has to rehydrate more than the average person. It sounds like RDoC will help bring neurologically pathological conditions out of the moral, bottom-up judgments of the "Dark Ages" and into the true light of science, with better treatability.

First principle of psychology we were taught was: If it's psychological; it's biological. Your video sheds important light on this in the "neural network perspective" sense. Thanks!

Regarding OCD, is there any correlation with people in "imperative-oriented" religions? Does the mind become trained by the repetitive nature of their daily life?

Cheer~~~the mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses.😊

bro has 2 gd references at one time L

guys is that a geom-

These videos are great, but may I suggest subtitles? Thank you!

geometry dash

This was awkward but informative. Thanks. It seems a bit mechanical reading off that script like that.

I wish this video gets more views and likes. You both have explained it eloquently in a short span of time. Thank you :)

exactly the info I was looking for. how can someone downvote this? 🤔

GREAT 👍

PhD-training Experimental Psychobiologist, here. I am wondering why the RDOC has not included as a major domain "Personality Processes," such as the five-factor model? There is a "social" and "cognitive" domain, and I see that pieces of "Neuroticism" in the big five are captured by negative and positive valence, to a degree, but the psychometric validity and reliability of something like the five-factor model is far better than most social constructs. Just a curious thing of note, as I watch this otherwise illuminating video. I have great respect for the work these scientists are doing, as my own work closely aligns with this framework.

A very nice introduction to Rdoc and helpful slides Thanks it was a great help

Superb... Very well explained.