until 2030 Poland will have the strongest landforces in europ... more then 1000 tanks M1 A2 Abrams ca.500stk. K2 black panter 1000stk, 250 leuopard tanks...more than 200 choon moo rocket systems, 600 himars , 32 F35, 48 F16, 96 Apache helicopters, 600 K9 canons ,3 new fregats on Baltic sea...new satelites and ca.300 tys. New milytary power in Europe
@zawiszaczarny78764 ай бұрын
These numbers and places are from 5-8 years ago...
@TheRezro4 ай бұрын
Well, Poland can be relatively easily reinforced sea and air. Which is why it focus primarily on Land Forces. Poland do plan buy F-35 (and FA50) and expand some other of they capabilities though.
@grzegorzciesiunik41044 ай бұрын
Tanks K2
@kamilpustula24544 ай бұрын
Mighty HIMARS mate. LOADS of them.
@trevor30134 ай бұрын
The US air force numbers are misleading. Since nearly all of not all branches of the US military has their own air force. The US navy has the second largest Air Force in the world by itself behind the Air Force itself. But people always say that on these videos so it's probably not even new knowledge for you.
@TheRezro4 ай бұрын
Yes. Different branches of US take four top spots.
@FLORATOSOTHON4 ай бұрын
Greece has 170 Leopard 2A6 HEL license built in Greece, 183 Leopard 2A4 to be modernized, 501 Leopard 1A5 to be modernized plus 20 with their main guns removed and equipped with mine ploughs, with additional Leopard 1s converted to bridge layers and 380 US M48 A5 MOLF with the Leopard 1A5 FCS for infantry support (106 M-60A3s are being withdrawn). The Greek AF has 152 F-16s with 120 of them being modernized to Block 70/72, 24 Mirage 2000-5, 24 Rafale F3Rs and 30 F-4Es modernized to an F-18C/D level. The F-4Es are expected to be replaced by 40 F-35As by 2030, while 32 of the older F-16s will most probably be withdrawn from service. There is also the possibility of replacing the Mirage 2000-5 with additional Rafale fighters, in order to standardize the aircraft types to three: F-16s, F-35As and Rafale.
@DornishVintage4 ай бұрын
Poland has been on a shopping spree for the year. They are looking to be the largest army in Europe after France.
@mts52174 ай бұрын
They have conditions for this and they have to do it because of a large bear that is looking for food in a neighbor's garden
@bosgamer1113 ай бұрын
@@mts5217😂
@timosthomo5664 ай бұрын
they have the tanks of greece wrong the full amound is 1365 . and the fighters are 202 . the rocket projectors 152 . the armored vechicles 58.000 . and the full prersonel is 425.000
@damianlakomski46614 ай бұрын
Poland 515.000 reserved soldiers.... correct this info pls.
@erenaygun4157Ай бұрын
These rankings have been updated. We (Türkiye 🇹🇷) is now the 3rd strongest country in NATO & 8th in the world. Also we have 1 aircraft carrier & the 2nd one is on the way i guess. As of 2024, the military strength ranking list is like that: 1- 🇺🇲 USA (1st in the world) 2- 🇬🇧 UK (6th) 3- 🇹🇷 Türkiye (8th) 4- 🇮🇹 Italy (10th) 5- 🇫🇷 France (11th) 6- 🇩🇪 Germany (19th) 7- 🇪🇸 Spain (20th) 8- 🇵🇱 Poland (21st) 9- 🇨🇦 Canada (27th) 10- 🇸🇪 Sweden (29th) 11- 🇬🇷 Greece (32nd) 12- 🇵🇹 Portugal (38th) 13- 🇳🇱 Netherlands (40th) 14- 🇳🇴 Norway (41st) 15- 🇨🇿 Czechia (46th) 16- 🇷🇴 Romania (47th) 17- 🇩🇰 Denmark (48th) 18- 🇫🇮 Finland (50th) 19- 🇭🇺 Hungary (54th) 20- 🇧🇬 Bulgaria (62nd) 21- 🇭🇷 Croatia (66th) 22- 🇸🇰 Slovakia (69th) 23- 🇧🇪 Belgium (70th) 24- 🇪🇪 Estonia (87th) 25- 🇱🇹 Lithuania (88th) 26- 🇦🇱 Albania (90th) 27- 🇸🇮 Slovenia (91st) 28- 🇱🇻 Latvia (99th) 29- 🇱🇺 Luxembourg (109th) 30- 🇲🇰 North Macedonia (110th) 31- 🇲🇪 Montenegro (129th) 32- 🇮🇸 Iceland (136th)
@MrMaro684 ай бұрын
This is a joke, not a serious list. If the entire NATO listed here (except the US and Turkey) can put up 25% of what is listed here, I will eat my shoes... Just ask how many of them are functional in the line and how many are only on paper as stock. The same applies to soldiers. How many are in the line and how many are behind the desk.
@thrkronos20084 ай бұрын
There are many mistakes in this video and I think Turkey has the 2nd strongest army of Nato, tanks and planes... Turkey is ahead of Europe from places like this
@GirmaKassa-ip7ht3 ай бұрын
Maybe in personnel if you’re talking about Army
@QBITASSASSIN4 ай бұрын
Sense this video is 2 years old now. Power in NATO has definitely changed now. I would say Britain is now probably be demoted to 5th in the coming years, sense they seem to be actively reducing their military. Sorry about that. But I think with Poland doubling their military by 2030 they probably will take Britain's spot. with Sweeden and Finland now joined. Finland and Sweeden would probably be in the top ten. Don't know what I would rank them though.
@kataclysmad10654 ай бұрын
True, however, the experience of battle proven training program makes so that, there is more to it than just the numbers. When Poland receive a massive amount of high tech weapons, they will need enough trained soldiers to operate them in combat. U.K has decades of experience by being involved in Iran, Irak, Afganistan, training Ukrainian soldiers and operating with U.S troops. This is not to be ignored.
@grey_774 ай бұрын
@@kataclysmad1065 Poland also took part in Iraq and Afghanistan. has been closely cooperating and training with the US for years, Poles also train Ukrainian soldiers
@geo3222424 ай бұрын
Greece no10 has bigger military than number 9 or 8 for example but it ranks lower because of lower population and smaller economy in general. The stats are taken from Global Firepower website. Greece is small but history taught enemies to never underestimate.
@voytasny52834 ай бұрын
I am one of Poles I Can tell you this news is very old we will have more equipment and order more stuff I don't know what you're talking about #9 By your opinion my opinion will much further What are you talking about Lose your mind Any poles can tell you bye
@QBITASSASSIN4 ай бұрын
I think they reported America's aircraft wrong to. The number of operational aircraft in total, should be more around 13 thousand. Sense the U.S. Air force has almost 6,000 just by itself. Then you have to count for the Navy. and the Marines and the Cost Gard. To be far though I believe the Cost Gard only has Helicopters.
@kataclysmad10654 ай бұрын
I think it takes 10 000 extra military personel to keep track of the numbers of the U.S millitary :D
@TheRezro4 ай бұрын
Four strongest Airforces on the world are: US Airforce US Navy US Marines and US Army Then China...
@Hades323 ай бұрын
well i dont know how making those lists but talking about numbers greece is way more powerful than poland.maybe the greek dept playing the negative role lmao
@vikinnorway67254 ай бұрын
Dont think anyone understand how big the us military really is😂 its crazy
@krzysztofsaa29974 ай бұрын
Poland way to low. Polish numbers and equipment are old. We have K-2 now K-9 and many more
@jaziahbryson6954 ай бұрын
The second largest navy is Americas fleet of museum ships
@Habilis7154 ай бұрын
i think poland will surpass most of those
@matyy_.4 ай бұрын
out of all of the Nato countries in that ranking Poland data is the most outdated i think last 2 years were pretty intense softly said when it comes to modernizing military and buying new shit ton of stuff like idk lets say Himars after ending the order they will be 2nd biggest user of that tech in nato
@Not-Impressed..18214 ай бұрын
Is this a parody video? The Brits themselves have said they have 40 operational tanks and a fleet they cannot support. The French Legion of Foreigners was kicked out of Burkina Faso without achieving anything. Germany is demilitarised and all the army they have is probably in the photos you see. Europe has near to 0 military industrial production. CNN reported that Russia has outproduced the entire Europe by 7 times. Only Poland is making an effort to upgrade its army. Let's face tfe facts. NATO is the US. The rest of it doesn't have the capability to beat some African sandal wearing tribes. And btw speaking of tribes, remember the massive fleet assembled by NATO countries to fight the Houthy tribe of Yemen? Yes, well just a few days ago the US officials said that this war cannot be resolved militarily.
@derbigpr5004 ай бұрын
Is this a parody comment? Or a "I'm american and I know nothing, and I'm damn proud of my ignorance" comment? Damn you've managed to fit so much crap into such a short comment. Stop talking about a topic you're clearly clueless about. Europe has 0 military industrial production? LMAO. Europe produces absolutely every piece of military equipment imaginable, and in 90% of cases the best in the world. Ships, helicopters, artillery, air defense, missiles, tanks, guns, etc. all better than anything anyone else produces. The only things USA makes better than Europe are 5th gen fighter jets, but that's gonna chance one EU starts making 6th gen fighters. Dude, France alone is ranked 2nd in the world behind USA and ahead of Russia in terms of military industry production and exporting. You're absolutely clueless about Europe. European part of NATO is some 2x more powerful than USA.
@draculakickyourass4 ай бұрын
Stop watching russian propaganda....Romania only produces more tanks, ammunitions and weapons then Russia.....let's be serious,if Europe has ,,near 0 military industrial production'' as you were informed, were the ammo and weapons used by Ukraine in the last 2 years comes from? Because only a small percentage comes from USA.
@jeremywilson20224 ай бұрын
I think personel maybe Army, Navy and Air force combined.
@krzysztofwierzbicki35524 ай бұрын
Coś nie tak z Polską. Dane są zaniżane,nie wiem skąd te dane
@tgsgardenmaintenance46274 ай бұрын
For the US , their best defense is also bit of a downfall, and that's geography! Attacking the US is pretty much impossible, however, transporting all that equipment across the world, is a massive logistical undertaking, and would take time! Not impossible though.
@simonn56514 ай бұрын
this right here IS the primary thing many of these silly video's simply seem to ignore , F U E L ........for a huge military it takes an unimaginable amount of fuel to power it and if a global war started this fuel supply would diminish extremely fast , granted some vehicles run on alternate fuel sources but that is tiny compared to the whole .......logistically speaking if you have no fuel to power vehicles your attacks/defense grind down to something like 10% of the whole ......if you can't logistically supply your forces , food/water/weapons/munitions then you have no force other than a defensive one to protect your home then the ONLY other option is nuclear........in recent years there has been many fuel crises going on fuel supplies on the brink already , military's around the world have a stockpile for the purposes of war but if war broke out that would burn down super fast and once it's gone it would fall heavily (extremely heavily) onto alternate fuel sources in which case that would mean a FULL refit of military vehicles (planes/boats/ground vehicles/and even hardware-rockets) which simply isn't doable in war time with no fuel .......a large force in large scale combat is not really feasible now (look what happened in ukraine when the russian massive convoy was stopped in it tracks for weeks due to fuel.
@GirmaKassa-ip7ht3 ай бұрын
Why would thé US transport anything when it got 800 bases containing ~150k personnel all over the world in addition to feud that can cover its demand
@1Anime4you4 ай бұрын
Haven't watched the video yet, but just off the top of my head, taking active manpower, total reservists, overall military spending, defensive infrastructure spending, level of technology, and political turbulence into account, I'd imagine it's gonna be something like this: 1. US 2. TURKEY 3. FRANCE 4. UK 5. GERMANY 6. POLAND 7. ITALY 8. SPAIN 9. CANADA (or GREECE) 10. GREECE (or CANADA) 11. FINLAND (or SWEDEN) 12. SWEDEN (or FINLAND) 13. CROATIA 14. THE NETHERLANDS 15. DENMARK I know that Greece spends an inordinate amount of money on their military, mostly because of the constant threats coming from Turkey, so not quite sure where to place them. Sweden's military actually outshines a lot of the higher countries on the list in terms of weapons technology and R&D, but Sweden has such abissmal numbers in terms of man-power that it feels fair to knock them down a few ranks. I also think it's fair to put the Finns quite high given their immense reserves of reserve personnel and ammunition.
@user-cb3qb2fs4j4 ай бұрын
That list is outdated those had made some purchases they are more powerful
@TheNukite4 ай бұрын
Greek army WOW! Did not know that.
@AndyWoohoo6664 ай бұрын
2 year old video and pretty inaccurate. Still interesting. Half of the Russian Black Sea fleet is now submarines, so they grow on that department, also some 400.000 Russian soldiers is in the "forever" reserve.
@CombatReadyHQ4 ай бұрын
Yes I said that with the numbers sounds a bit inaccurate
@AndyWoohoo6664 ай бұрын
@@CombatReadyHQ Yeah you were spot on with that but also the equipment both numbers and type. Still enjoyable.
@erdemsherif78324 ай бұрын
I dont understand how italy can be better then Turkey? Its shameful
@ernestobonanni51274 ай бұрын
You said it. You do not understand.
@Maloenton-Agency4 ай бұрын
Italy is an industrialized country and is part of the G7....Turkey is not!
@andd654 ай бұрын
Dude... go to the horse races, maybe it's better
@ExUSSailor4 ай бұрын
The Leopard 2 is that popular simply because it is cheaper than the superior M1A2 Abrams. The Abrams is faster, better protected, with equal firepower, and, vastly superior sensors & fire control.
@AndyWoohoo6664 ай бұрын
Sorry but I think you have to do some research on that claim one more time. They have the same speed, same power output, firepower M256 cannon, also known as the Rheinmetall L44 so the same. As for protection, a know complaint in US military among tank crew is that the driver is not well protected but also most is classified regarding both sides. Same goes for sensors and fire control, so unless you got information on both parties I call that subjective bias. Several contests have show the Leopard winning several times, by all means feel free to fact check with some use of the Goggle machine. Oh and I'm not saying the Abrahams is a bad tank in any way, it's just not superior to Leopard 2 Sidenote, the Leopard 2A5S ( Swedish variant ) is the most protected of all the Leopards and basically most modern tanks and as you know there are a lot of variants of the Leopard 2. As an example. Read More: www.slashgear.com/1316789/m1-abrams-vs-leopard-2-tank/
@Andy1089534 ай бұрын
Not really. But A for effort. 👍🏻
@derbigpr5004 ай бұрын
False, false, false, and oh, false. There's literally nothing the M1 does better. Nothing. Ukrainians also say it's absolutely garbage, actually useless in combat, gets stuck in environments that other tanks go through without breaking a sweat, it can't be used on mud because the air intakes for the gas turbine engine gets clogged in like 5 minutes of driving, it's too heavy, it has a horrible power to weight ratio, and a horrible weight to surface contact ratio, so it has no grip, accelerates poorly and sinks into any muddy terrain like a led weight. It's also got too many weak spots, no auto loader, the gun is not as well integrated as the one on the Leopards despite being technically the same, it lets out a HUGE heat signature due to the gas turbine engines, so it's totally useless at night and also in the day when thermal cams can pick it up very easily, and it's a super easy target for drones. Ukranians say it's by far the worst tank they got from the west, and say it's worse than their old T72 in terms of effectiveness in battle. And yea, keep up the "MURICAH NUMBAH ONE" attitude, ignorantly believing everything you make is better, when in 99% of cases in reality it's not.
@user-om9dc5dy7m4 ай бұрын
🇬🇷🇬🇷
@pedronobrega54574 ай бұрын
NATO super power ???? really ??? then tell me .... after 2 years of comflict in ukraine how many MILIMITERS of terrain did that amazing super power have manage to recover from the russians ??? you see to mutch movies man ... i advice you to read books or ( USA heritage foundation reports about USA military strenght ) about this super power that you are talking about ...
@GirmaKassa-ip7ht3 ай бұрын
NATO is not fighting Russia, just supplying weapons. And Russia couldn’t even handle Ukrainians and its 2 weeks special operation has gone too long
@pedronobrega54573 ай бұрын
@@GirmaKassa-ip7ht aaaa NATO its not fighting Russia ... Then explain me who have trained ukrainian trops since 2014 coup untill 2022 ??? the alians ???? No ... Russia its fighting againts NATO TRAINED TROPS, EQUIPMENT, TACTICS, INTELIGENCE SERVICES, ETC .. there is nothing in thIS comflict that its not FROM NATO ... even the coup in KIEV was realized with the help of USA and UE
@pedronobrega54573 ай бұрын
@@GirmaKassa-ip7ht IF ukraininan trops have been trained in NATO tactics ( since 2014 coup untill 2022 = 8 years of training ) , IF ukrainian trops are using NATO weapons and NATO intelegence services ... . Then russia it figthing not againt ukraine but againts all NATO military power, tactics and intelegence ... . Iam going to ask you again: "if NATO its that strong how many milimiters of terrain did NATO trops manage to regain from russia" ? . If NATO its strong then why are you seending f-16 insted of seending f-22 ?? send f-22 insted bro and american trops also please ... f-16 are old as fuck ... send the new ones for you to learn something new ...
@Jepri_454 ай бұрын
east asia combine is more stronger than all nato power,,,East asian country is china,United Korea,Japan,Taiwan,Hongkong
@keithgolden774 ай бұрын
"United korea" Korea isn't united dude. you talking N' Korea? S.Korea? N. Korea military is weak compared to most if stand alone. their military tech is so outdated, they couldn't win a war if they went back to 1950's now! As for China, the only Asian country with enough power to be respected but never feared. yes they have the numbers, but the experience and tech is behind even Japan and S. Korea. Japan, it's tech is on part with American to a point. since most of it's tech is American, they just don't have the numbers. Taiwan, their tech is good, but not top notch, their numbers are few and their geography alone is bad. As for Hong Kong, last I heard that was a part of China. so they wouldn't even get a mention in this. Sorry Hong Kong! As for your statement that East Asian combined is "stronger" than all of Nato, you just saw only the 10 countries in it. and those 10 countries have the numbers and firepower to wipe most of Asia off the planet. non nuke warefare. just for numbers. sorry man, but East Asia cannot compare to Nato.
@dmytriy_dmitriy4 ай бұрын
ahahahahaha
@grotoni26874 ай бұрын
That kind of nervous laugh
@Paraskevas744 ай бұрын
Poland Canada over rated Obviously Turkey should be number 2
@dawidkujawski33404 ай бұрын
hmm Poland over rated ?? Funny In 2023, 116 M1A1 tanks were signed for supply to Poland, of which 40 have already been delivered. The remaining 76 machines are to arrive this year, and in 2025 another 125 tanks from the USA will be delivered to us. This time we are talking about M1A2 tanks purchased in 2022. Another 18 K2 tanks from South Korea will arrive in Poland in 2023 (we already have 28 machines in total). At the end of 2024, their number is expected to increase to 84, and to 180 in 2025. A contract for additional K2 tanks is also expected this year. This time, some of them would be built in Poland. The Ministry of National Defense announced in the past that it intended to purchase another 820 K2 tanks.
@dawidkujawski33404 ай бұрын
Even more is happening in rocket artillery. The Polish Army already has 15 of the 218 K239 Chumnoo launchers ordered. The Korean launchers are mounted on the Polish Jelcz 8x8 chassis. Last year, we received 18 M142 HIMARS launchers, which we ordered in 2019. We also want to buy thousands of rockets with M142 launchers. Poland will receive 2,766 GMLRS-AW M30A1 missiles and 3,126 GMLRS M31 missiles. Both missiles have a range of approximately 80 km, and one M142 HIMARS set can carry up to 6 such missiles at one time. The Polish rocket artillery may also be armed with 3,192 GMLRS ER missiles with a range of 150 km. We will also have at our disposal much heavier MGM-140 ATACMS missiles with a warhead weighing 227 kg. Their range is 300 km.
@dawidkujawski33404 ай бұрын
What would artillery be without reconnaissance? This is to ensure, among others, nearly 1,700 FlyEye unmanned aerial vehicles. This number of UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) is covered by the framework agreement signed last year. Will we see an executive agreement in 2024? Time will tell. By 2023, the Polish Army has received a total of 168 FlyEyes. In 2022-23, 3 of the 4 Bayraktar TB2 sets ordered (6 UAVs each) arrived. This year we will see the delivery of the last set ordered.
@dawidkujawski33404 ай бұрын
I won't mention planes and infantry fighting vehicles - because we keep buying like crazy.
@Paraskevas744 ай бұрын
@@dawidkujawski3340 no please don’t embarrass your self any more by mentioning Poland’s Air Force of 50 and future F35 or their navy with 2 frigates one sub oh please tell us about Thai air defense oops I forgot is coming soon
@h8everythingdies4 ай бұрын
ukraine does not even have a navy and they are stronger than all. Think unkraine. www.youtube.com/@ThinkUkraine
@marcinjedrzejewski70394 ай бұрын
They are stronger than All you say? So tell me where from they got they're equipment from?😂