Psychologist and Nobel Laureate Daniel Kahneman discusses his new book - 'Thinking, Fast and Slow' - and why our gut instincts are usually wrong
Пікірлер: 51
@BlogOozIe12 жыл бұрын
What a personality. The combo of Daniel Kahneman's charisma and humility is enviable.
@krishnateja77286 жыл бұрын
409.. aww that made her humble. Attitude dropped down like a big avalanche.
@narennallapareddy29944 жыл бұрын
I mean she should realize she's speaking with THE Daniel Kahneman.
@CristobalRuiz4 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha LMAO and she even says "soooo close" So glad that helped her tune down her attitude.
@leolok26327 жыл бұрын
Agreed. The TIME interviewer should not interrupt intervene or bombard with multiple questions or questionnaire list. Allow Kahneman to continue his thoughts. Let the exchange flow naturally. She should just LISTEN.
@jaredmowry85442 жыл бұрын
She’s disgustingly off-putting. She needs to find a new career field. Couldn’t bear to finish the video, exclusively because of her pigeon-face annoyance.
@leversandpulleys92742 жыл бұрын
4:48 "We use the word 'know' in peculiar ways and that strengthen the illusion that we understand the world when we really don't" that.
@MindAgilis10 жыл бұрын
Very insightful. Being aware of the strengths and weaknesses of our more 'instinctive' System 1 should translate into better decision-making. What else can we do to improve our decision-making and problem-solving skills? Could video games help in areas such as impulse control, mental flexibility, and planning?
@grigor.dimitrov9 жыл бұрын
The description is wrong, it says that "our gut instincts are usually wrong" whereas the book argues that our gut instincts are usually right but there are systematic deviations, also called biases
@ico22469 жыл бұрын
Ajamm si pero no es intuición sino experiencia que han ganado expertos por la repetición continúa de ciertos actos como explica en el ejemplo del ajedrez el jugador experimentado (el experto) ya tiene miles des jugadas en su memoria es por eso que recurre a alguna con mayor facilidad.
@ico22469 жыл бұрын
Perdón corrijo instinto.
@grigor.dimitrov9 жыл бұрын
David Salces Кво? Не
@Influences11 жыл бұрын
I loved the interview except for the part about "not being a fan" of intuition. I don't think the Dr is not a fan of intuition. I think there's a difference between just "going with our gut" and using knowledgeable intuition. For example, I would trust a doctor to stitch up my hand if I needed a few stitches because I trust his intuition in medicine. When we practice something for long periods of time, we effectively train our intuition in a particular field. That could have been expressed.
@tranformbites2 ай бұрын
His humility is disarming.
@gggrrr0010 жыл бұрын
What he's proposing, that people should not be so confident about their positions, and that they over-rely on their own intuition is Very counter cultural today. Everyone preaches confidence and our own flawed EGO's like to think we are right. Well, he's just saying consider data and broad perspectives and measures info most, and then your "gut" second and after that. The EGO people will attack that notion - but in fact he's being very reasonable here - which in fact most people are not, they like to service their own Egos. This is a great, revolutionary book, read it.
@Danzelblock9 жыл бұрын
Hank MoHank Conman is the sort of cowardly proponent of the analytic, always glorifying the value of linear thought, and the function of short-term memory - receiving praises only from a public with an already inflated sense of intellectual worth (IQ theory). It remains so, the greatest philosophers of mind have always supported intuition and the freedom in selecting elements of thought (Von Neumann called it art), while the laymen will always cower behind analysis, as if it somehow makes up for their lack of worldly achievements. Very few minds in Western societies today, given the presence of the biases against intuition, heuristic, and creative thought, can flourish, but still the evidence of the powers of intuition prevails, thought most often, in the one in a million types, who come to change the world. Confidence isn't something that gives us the right answer - that's the structure of our brain. Confidence arises when someone is used to being right.
@rahulkhan-no6rc4 жыл бұрын
Nice voice
@kinder1234ify12 жыл бұрын
what for example?
@damdinsurensolongo12104 жыл бұрын
Very impressive interview
@mikiallen77332 жыл бұрын
Q 11 - The famed Hakkanson paradox is as follows: if markets are complete and options are redudant, why would someone need them?
@supriya5512 жыл бұрын
am so reading that book
@pustakgagin28267 жыл бұрын
did you read it by now?
@marcellovacca31553 жыл бұрын
My system 1 says the interviewer didn't read the book.
@sanjeevkushwaha40432 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha 😂😂😂😂
@MrCassavius12 жыл бұрын
I cant stand that woman. The interrviews are ok, but she's really annoying (a perception made over several clips, not at first sight)
@doug27313 жыл бұрын
Edituh At Laaaahhhj
@GreatMan_from_East2 жыл бұрын
Great Scholar
@DistortedV128 жыл бұрын
This interview...was... ? terrible.
@TheTHUSWORD2 жыл бұрын
am a psychologist and not an economist that hit hard.
@shortfunnyvideos92743 жыл бұрын
Curb your Nobel Prize
@dorianphilotheates3769 Жыл бұрын
5:10 - I’m not: Buck$ 💵💰
@LouisDamMikkelsen12 жыл бұрын
@mstrephoenix1 Trade in some of that rage for proper grammar and cogency before denigrating someone.
@Yuri9200112 жыл бұрын
@mstrephoenix1 The only question is how long it is going to take to get enough spam markers and/or thumbs down on your asinine posts.
@zolapoe12 жыл бұрын
Exactly the opposite of Ken Robinson, who's very talented at speaking in public but whose writing is just 'bland'.
@moviedude2212 жыл бұрын
@mstrephoenix1 haha so what?
@SandeepKulshrestha2 ай бұрын
Rest in peace, Professor Kahneman. The interviewer in this video is not qualified
@krishnateja77286 жыл бұрын
terrible interviewer! come on he's a Nobel Prize winner, not any of your nosy neighbor Joe!
@kehindeonakunle57304 жыл бұрын
The questions are grossly incompetent, ineffective, infantile
@Pfsif7 жыл бұрын
Another Jew saying Bush is an idiot.
@Danzelblock9 жыл бұрын
Conman is the sort of cowardly proponent of the analytic, always glorifying the value of linear thought, and the function of short-term memory - receiving praises only from a public with an already inflated sense of intellectual worth (IQ theory). It remains so, the greatest philosophers of mind have always supported intuition and the freedom in selecting elements of thought (Von Neumann called it art), while the laymen will always cower behind analysis, as if it somehow makes up for their lack of worldly achievements. Very few minds in Western societies today, given the presence of the biases against intuition, heuristic, and creative thought, can flourish, but still the evidence of the powers of intuition prevails, thought most often, in the one in a million types, who come to change the world.
@tom123knightley6 жыл бұрын
absolute rubbish. if you have read the book then you haven't understood it and should try again.
@cz17303 жыл бұрын
We can‘t stand with this woman.
@homanasiri8433 ай бұрын
Only a liberal Pres can think 😂
@relaxbro56055 ай бұрын
His book is full of errors and studies that can't be replicated...
@homanasiri8433 ай бұрын
Trump is the best thinker
@captainyas12 жыл бұрын
WOW. they must be giving nobel prizes away. seriousely, this guy?!
@siddharthraychaudhuri72505 жыл бұрын
And you came to your conclusion by watching a 6 minute video?? Now wonder he was given the Nobel prize! You would understand what I mean if you genuinely study his work.
@George-on5rb4 жыл бұрын
His 700 page book influenced lots of economists but not 12 years old boys yet.