100% Green Energy Is Impossible!

[@stephenbrickwood1602]

I like your work 😊

[@dronequote]

Thank you so much Good Sir!

[@lkrnpk]

Most countries are nowhere near 100% green enery and yapping about how there will be no such thing surely dies not help to increase the %. Maybe we try doing the best we can and then we’ll see?

[@dronequote]

I mean, we want more solar it’s one way we make revenue, but I’m also realistic about the fact we likely won’t get there.

[@stephenbrickwood1602]

9.1 billion tonnes of CO2 each year. 2 tonne vehicles is 4.5 billion vehicles dispersed in the atmosphere. 😮😮😮😮😮 each year.

[@stephenbrickwood1602]

Keep nuclear if you have it. Just be aware of its limitations. 15% of all energy used is grid electricity. The most expensive energy. Grid electricity comes with the grid. Nuclear promoters will say exactly the same. Nuclear promoters do not want to build new grid capacity because it is extremely expensive. Nuclear promoters want to fill the existing national grid to monopolise the grid. 😊 Nuclear promoters want EVs Renewables promoters want EVs Big batteries like the South Australian state are valuable in protecting the Australian national electrical grid from instabilities. Extremely profitable. Cost $100million, revenue in first year $150million. All promoters value maximum use of their own infrastructure. Productivity over every 24hrs. Idle resources are an uneconomic waste. Most vehicles are parked 23hrs every day. One hour of productivity every 24hrs. Most EVs will be full every day, topped up by renewable electricity, or cheap electricity or paid to take over production. Most vehicles drive building to building. Most EVs can be connected to the grid 23hrs every day. 300million vehicles in the USA is a MASSIVE battery resource and it would be easy to put that resource to use 24hrs every day. 1 hour for the daily drive 23hrs for national energy supply. Renewables powering the grid and battery storage for part of the day. 300million EVs 100kWh battery working for the energy dollar as needed. 300million EVs storage happens to be too big by 4 or 5 times daily. In Australia 20million EVs 100kWh battery is 2,000gWh. 24hr demand is 400gWh daily avg. It is hard to get to your economic destination if you are going on the wrong path. One technology may be a total over investment and block newer efficient technologies. Nuclear is a decades construction and $BILLIONS and a century of profits if customers are locked in. ( Illegal to go offgrid ??? ) One EV, one rooftop PV, one small 10kWh house battery (or the second EV) and customers do not have to pay for the most expensive energy, grid electricity. In a 100% electric future world. An LNG bottle waiting for emergency use in mid winter weeks is ezi pezi. A warming climate means warmer latitudes. More energy in the atmosphere, which will be energetic and exciting 😀 😄 😎. Does the USA military defence think that nuclear electricity will stop CO2 emissions worldwide ??? All Dictators steal technology, let them steal renewables and save the climate from destabilisation. Hahaha Hahaha. 80% of the world's population live in dictatorships. You made me think again. 🤔

[@stephenbrickwood1602]

Waste. Recycling is rapidly developing new technologies. Batteries have valuable materials. And can have a 2nd life before Recycling. Rooftop PV have valuable aluminium. And recyclable glass. EVs can be part of the energy system, in use 24hrs every day. Waste of time parked, underutilised expensive resource. Power bills are grid rental bills using someone's cheap fead-in electricity. 😮😮😮