120 days in the field: Extensive ZEISS SFL 10x40 field review from professional hunter Mike Deming

[@johnconklin5180]

I compared the 10/42 Swaro’s EL. And the Zeiss SFL. First let me say the Zeiss are fine glass, light and easier to haul up a mountain (7 ounce difference). Sturdy and well built. The Swarovski are on sale now for $1,999. Still a significant difference. BUT the superior glass is without doubt in the Swaro’s. Crisper, brighter, color, you name it. In my opinion the Swaro’s are superior and well worth the difference in price and 7 ounces. I’ll carry the Swaro’s every day of the week. Just my opinion.

[@vikinona]

Hi, I have Swarovski 10x42 EL, but I'm not happy because it's not too sharp. Compared to Nikon EDG and EDG, it is sharper and compared to Bushnel Nitro 10x36 and in the middle of the field of vision is as sharp as EDG. I also had Zeiss Victory SF and had the best distinction just wasn't so clear. The Nikon SE was clearer. Zeiss Conquest is the brightest and had the best outlines and sharper than EL.

[@GM-bq6zo]

​@@vikinonaswarovski el is very sharp.

[@GM-bq6zo]

Are these as good as the 8x32 swarovski el?

[@GM-bq6zo]

​@@bıçak_knife_messer_toolhave u compared them?

[@bıçak_knife_messer_tool]

*Swarovski NL Pure Direct Rival Zeiss Victory HT,,,Zeiss SFL vs Swarovski NL Pure Comparison İmpossible*