#143

[@2trichoptera]

Great guest. Always delighted to hear what he has to say. Brilliant mind. Thank you.

[@removethewill]

Great. Really apreciate your podcast for the depth of the conversation. Keep it up !!

[@Artzimer1958]

The drive podcast is one of the best. Thank you for your hard work and bringing all these amazing guests. I have listened to every one of your podcast.Thank you thank you

[@abejaamarilla4961]

Gracias por tu gran esfuerzo, muchos lo apreciamos aunque no podamos apoyarte$$ pero te apoyamos de corazón! Gracias Peter Attia!! Muchos te seguimos!!1

[@bandkmacsailer]

Fantastic. Thank you. More and better science. Please

[@kennyprice5017]

I would love to here Peter talk to an expert on gut health Microbiome

[@falstmusic]

Loved the idea on D.B. Cooper

[@geopietro]

Peter, regarding the seroprevalence of Covid19, is it absolutely certain that the antibody test is picking up Covid19 as opposed to the coronavirus family? And does the seroprevalence account for (or adjust for) false positive test results? Thank you for such an erudite conversation with Dr. Ioannidis.

[@LTPottenger]

If it's that prevalent it just proves even more it's nothing to worry about.

[@netto682]

Muito bom 🇧🇷 , bem conduzido 👏👏👏

[@CraigCastanet]

You can't stop vitriol. You have to explicitly reject it. Scientists and science has to be defended. Scientists have to have courage. The solution to bad free speech is more free speech. That is the burden and beauty of free speech.

[@annnnn9074]

70% of work doesn't get sited. When someone does something really well those who know about it often want to keep it to themselves as they don't want competition to know who the inventor is, perhaps they'll find away to profit from someone else's thinking is the basic idea behind psychiatry. Of course the patient always shuts up once they know what's happening and thus humanity is often the looser.

[@annnnn9074]

I guess from your point of view and it's been a long time since I check so recheck. The average doctor is required to be vaccinated each year and the average doctor dies I think it was 3 years younger than the general population - and when you consider a doctors working life begins at the age of say 25 years old - you can see how bad vaccines are for your over all health perhaps 10 or 15 years younger than the 25 year old general population

[@LTPottenger]

I never thought of that but interesting, and actually I had read at some point they die on average at 59 years old. That was years ago though.At any rate I am not taking the covid 1984 vaccine, it is a vaccine for the f**** cold lol

[@Billy97ify]

Maximize chronic disease and the sales of patented drugs. That is the goal,

[@matkagrogan5251]

I only wonder what is John’s opinion on Fauci today, in 2023 :)

[@annnnn9074]

it's all very well discusing smoking - in the young, but for the old those who do know the risk why should psychiatrists steal from parents the basic right to decide your own death. Lung's wouldn't be my choice because I am young and not a smoker but if you were a grand parent with failing lungs anyway - someone like my mother, would you not enjoy every smoke as a reminder of the old days, when people went to watch horse racers, they went to movies, they enjoyed drinking. They have had so much stollen to be left at home alone doing jig saw puzzles or watching re-runs of the news

[@Dan-jo8py]

Of course if it weren't for the egotism of not wanting to share credit then experimentalists could always just be required to submit all data to separate statisticians who will tell them what the collected data actually means and thus solve the problem...🙄

[@LTPottenger]

It's corrupt, they don't want the right result they want the one that makes them money or mankes their political point like all the vegan nonsense studies.

[@greendeane1]

Pathological science (if it is science at all.)

[@francisbertolini2590]

Just say you’re a Democrat that’s clearly your bias. Faux is a politician that knows science. Apply that same ability to change your mind to the then President. This is the second lecture where you have segued into politics with most obvious inferences.