172 - A Look Through Indian History In Conversation With Dr. Vikram Sampath | Culture | Bharatvaarta

[@ramakantsingh2903]

Mind blowing discourse on some of the important aspects of our modern history. Dr Sampat is as fluent and clear on the subject as usual. Thanks to them including the organizers of the podcast .

[@Bharatvaarta]

Thank you, Ramakant ji! Do share this podcast and also subscribe to our channel, so more people can discover good content. 🙂🙏

[@ckcariappa]

Truly amazing experience, hearing Vikram speak about Veer Savarkar, Netaji Bose, Lokmanya Tilak and other fascinating aspects of Indian History... do check it out! 🙂

[@mohanrao5844]

Hats of to Mr. Sampath

[@nirvanabliss73]

12:18 > what is the name taken by VS here? Barin Ghosh and ????

[@achandorkar]

Ulaskar Dutt

[@nirvanabliss73]

@@achandorkar Thanks, Aashish

[@nirvanabliss73]

41:08: V.S mentions Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose forming an alliance with the Muslim League. Surprisingly (or not so surprisingly) he fails to mention that the Hindu Mahasabha too has formed an alliance with the Muslim League in their history. V.S. also is quick to criticize the Congress and the opposition parties prior to this statement but he treats the BJP / RSS with kid gloves. Sad…..

[@neelakantannatarajan3851]

What's the issue? Is right to kid gloves belong only to left

[@nirvanabliss73]

@@neelakantannatarajan3851 ok, so are you effectively saying VS is as bad (or as good) as the left? didnt understand your reply

[@neelakantannatarajan3851]

@@nirvanabliss73 no I meant he has to have a bias towards indic viewpoint Otherwise the other side who have no morality will shout loudest

[@nirvanabliss73]

@@neelakantannatarajan3851 thats unusual logic. That means, everybody is knowingly biased. Therefore dont trust anyone's intentions

[@nirvanabliss73]

@@neelakantannatarajan3851 i am not getting you. You are ok if Vikram S is not neutral since the so-called Left is also not neutral. So, that means both parties are biased according to you. And therefore both are not to be trusted?

[@chittoghosh6071]

Having strong affinity to historical discourses and narratives, i am getting more and more convinced that he is a veiled historian. He has his agenda set and flaunted his streak of far right ideology of the present dispension. He spends more time to prove that but for him or his likes all historians are idiots, biased and partisan. Sounds too blunt and self congratulatory.

[@saratsahoo4198]

Paid history is biased.

[@Bharatvaarta]

Thanks for watching! Please share and subscribe. 🙂🙏