SLICE History, cool video keep up the great content
@SLICEHistory3 ай бұрын
Thank you for your support ! ☺
@The89delta3 ай бұрын
Comments are filled with considering Stalingrad the “turning point”. Army group center suffered over 900,000 casualties during the winter of 41. Absolutely obliterated in front of Moscow. No one talks about that.
@vanpaul1473 ай бұрын
Moscow was the true turning point. Or in particular Barbarossa ha
@garysline55012 ай бұрын
I agree. That in my opinion was the turning point of the war. Not Stalingrad.
@gordonbennet1094Ай бұрын
Correct. Stalingrad was more memorable because it was very clearly defined - a small geagraphical locaton, a clear start date, a clear end date, and measurable loses. The battle of Moscow had no clear start or end date, no clear boundaries, and no way to define exact losses. But it was indeed the turning point of the war. It was the first time the German army had suffered a major defeat. It was an impossibe event. For the Germans it was the first glimpse of a reality that had hitherto been hidden from them by their own arrogant assumptions - a glimpse of the possibility of a replay of Naploeon's invasion. The German army for Op Barbarossa was the strongest best equipped and most experienced it would ever be ... and it had failed.
@evgeniysv71053 ай бұрын
The great content! Slice, you are the best!
@SLICEHistory3 ай бұрын
Thank you ! ❤
@davidjackson21793 ай бұрын
By 1942 Germany was still dangerous and capable of winning individual battles but their opportunity to win a limited victory in the war was long gone. They could never compete with the industrial production and manpower of the Allies.
@The89delta3 ай бұрын
Germany industrialized in breadth, but not in depth.
@xanderunderwoods33633 ай бұрын
I can't say I agree, Germany did not implement a total war industrial economy until 1943, the few months of production numbers in 1945 alone far exceed the entire production numbers of 1942. It's all about industrial logistic capabilities. Had Germany implemented this in 1939, the Allies would have been fighting at least until 1946, if not 1947.
@chrisf88553 ай бұрын
Baba Booey
@WarMonkeyOG3 ай бұрын
Slice History is awesome documentary page! 🙌
@SLICEHistory3 ай бұрын
Thank you ! 🤗
@helenlovescats3 ай бұрын
Another 10/10 slice. Love your docu's
@SLICEHistory3 ай бұрын
Thank you so much ! ☺
@proffesionalbuildingsolutions3 ай бұрын
SLICE history, consistency and quality. Keep up the good job guys!
@SLICEHistory3 ай бұрын
Thank you for your kind comment ☺
@xanderunderwoods33633 ай бұрын
The sorties over Stalingrad were actually much higher. Field reports both by the Soviets, and by the Germans, show that they flew more sorties than even at the height of the Battle of Britain, well over two thousand per day. Recent forensic studies show the actual casualties during the battle of Stalingrad, exceeded 2.5 million. It was by far the largest battle in human history. It's really hard to grasp just how apocalyptic it was. What's even crazier is that the battle of Kursk in 43 was perhaps not as big, but far more concentrated and local and it's scale of isolation, only the battle of the Somme and Verdun in WW1 are similar in comparison, as far as localized carnage is concerned. The Eastern front during world war two was a scale of carnage simply unseen in the records of human history since perhaps the days of Ghengis Khan. I hope we never see such a thing again. However, history has a tendency to repeat itself....also the French Navy DID resist incredibly ferociously in North Africa, that should have been highlighted.
@ericjarvie3 ай бұрын
Slice History the best Second World War documentaries on You-Tube..and this by any measure..!!
@ericjarvie3 ай бұрын
No doubt Irwin Rommell was an brilliant general and skilled military tactician so much so even the allies had some admiration and respect for an man who was indeed there sworn mortal enemy...but it's telling of the vile and inhumane nature and conduct of Hitler during the war who became increasingly jealous of Rommells fame and notoriety and in this ultimately ordering the death of Germanys greatest commander this was undoubtedly one of Hitlers most despicable and cowardly acts who like an deranged juvenile jealously saw the charismatic and populat German general Rommell as nothing more than an potential threat to his vile ideal of leadeship...
@SLICEHistory3 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for your comment ! Glad to know our WWII content is appreciated ☺
@shimmjaxxs12103 ай бұрын
Love your guys page!!
@SLICEHistory3 ай бұрын
Thank you !! 🤗
@mohammedsaysrashid35873 ай бұрын
It was an informative and wonderful historical coverage documentary...
@eoofun52433 ай бұрын
Love SLICE history. Thank you guys for what you do. Germany could have won it. If they would have finished the British at Dunkirk, that would have been all she wrote. And even after that, they could have beat the Soviet Union if their racist ideology didn’t have them follow a miserable military strategy of killing and enslave. But even after all that, they could have won at Stalingrad if it was viewed as a siege but they strategically retreated and did a 2nd offensive after winter and they got use to the terrain. The German generals were so much better then they could have been in Russia. Their hands were tied with Hitler’s ego after his defeat of France. Poland started the end for the Germans. They captured all these countries, but couldn’t utilize them.
@Swellington_3 ай бұрын
I agree,if it wasnt for a few bad decisions,Dunkirk for one,if they had captured a large number of soldiers,British citizens mainly,and not even the entire BEF,I couldnt imagine Britian not making some sort of "deal" with Hitler to get those men back alive,and whatever the deal wouldve been,it would not been in Britians favor but the British ppl wouldnt allow their sons and fathers and brothers etc languish in a Nazi concentration camp at that particular point in the war,and 2nd,Hitler splitting his force in front of Stalingrad was a blunder and Paulus couldve taken the city even after that if he hadnt halted outside of town and regrouped for 3 days or whatever,just enough for the Soviets to dig in and that was all they needed,the Germans held 98% of the city at one point,but the city couldve probably been taken "off the march" if the armor that went south had stayed with the 6th,and something thats hardly mentioned thats mind boggling and an absolute fact,is that until 43,Stalin was still trying to negotiate a peace that included Hitler getting either a big chunk of Ukraine or all of it and some or all the Baltic states,no Russian proper territory so Stalin didnt mind so much,but the thing is Hitler turned him down every single time,obviously,thats completly insane,but Hitler mustve had his reasons because as evil and everything else he was,one thing he was not was stupid,he got pretty "weird" towards the end,from the bomb plot on for sure but the early years he was sharp usually,and Ive typed way too much :(
@FBT93563 ай бұрын
I learned many years ago that if Hitler had not been so hung up on Names ie Stalin and didn’t split Army Group Center and had gotten Astrakhan they could’ve beaten the RED army Italians Hungarians and Bulgarians sucked at War
@scottmaclaren46953 ай бұрын
if only. if Germany had won there would be world peace and colonies in space
@garyeastell34583 ай бұрын
If only nothing. If Germany and Japan had won , most of the people commenting would not have been here as there parents or grandparents would have been killed. And as for Germany winning, all they could do is prolong the war , they could never compete with the rest of the world on an industrial scale , or manpower.
@Jochiampieper3 ай бұрын
@slicehistory Do you guys produce these documentaries yourselves ? As in finding the footage , doing the interviews editing etc ? If you aren’t can you provide where your getting the documentaries from so those of us who want to can watch it unedited ?
@nigelhamilton8153 ай бұрын
My dad served in north Africa as part of the 8th army.
@dr.barrycohn54613 ай бұрын
Hitler just thought all he had to do was kick in the door and thenwhole rotten structure would cave in. Hmmm... germany had very had intel with his underestimating his opponent.
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
The German's didn't even have accurate map's. After the failure at Moscow in December '41 they were in retreat.
@mis4nthr0p33 ай бұрын
@@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cgAdditionally, those maps they had showed paved roads instead of unpaved which turned into quagmires in rainy weather. (giggity)
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
@@mis4nthr0p3 well at least they could drive on the map's! (Magic Map's)
@Yuohani2 ай бұрын
@@dr.barrycohn5461 the collective west today has the same mindset that Russia is merely a gas station with a few nuclear bomb that under the weight of the western sanctions and military support to Kiev it will collapse within months
@ronaldstrange89813 ай бұрын
Excellent. Much appreciated. England, August, 2024.
@martintinajero91403 ай бұрын
Will the battle of Berlin be next?
@knowledgeispower2003 ай бұрын
Flying over Stalingrad in 1944 de Gaulle spoke the following words: "Ah, Stalingrad! All the same, they are a great people, a very great people." Alexander Werth: "Ah, yes, the Russians..." Charles deGaulle: "No, I'm not talking about the Russians; I mean the Germans. In spite of everything, to have pushed so far!"
@Swellington_3 ай бұрын
yeah,for real and then lost it all,literally everything
@thepablyko3 ай бұрын
bit one sided when it comes to the stalingrad, you make it look like an army of low moral values and tactics whilst it was the german army that invaded and massacred their people... pd: the soviets were so bad they won ay
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
Come winter we lost our Han's and Willi's!
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
At Stalingrad Hitler could have declared victory and widthdrawn
@darkpenguin19783 ай бұрын
Doesn't understand those who blame the Soviet leaders who was surprised to be attacked under peace treaty by the cowards Germans of wasting the life of theirs soldiers
@spannaspinna2 ай бұрын
Well they wasted plenty of reds doing it I guess
@nedim31643 ай бұрын
Stalingrad masen grab 🇩🇪😢
@Wasko13122 ай бұрын
shell shock.
@hawaiianpineapple73033 ай бұрын
Nazi Germany would have lost no matter what Hitler did
@-Sierra117-3 ай бұрын
I disagree
@douglasturner61533 ай бұрын
So Hitler was unhappy that in 1942 it became a World War? Then why did he idiotically declare war on USA? 😂
@Ex-MuslimMuhammad-o4d3 ай бұрын
Of course he was unhappy cuz he wanted the UK and the US to surrender without a fight
@Napolean463 ай бұрын
He was a madman who could not use his head well before making a decision. A drug man
@gott4bomb8353 ай бұрын
No dismounting from a tiger ride so to speak. Also German intelligence failed miserably in assessing the Soviet Union's actual military potential.
@jamshediqbalrana4163 ай бұрын
Doesn t the commentator know that Stalin proved to be invincible as against a stupid , non general Adolf Hitler.?
@Yuohani3 ай бұрын
Please be aware this is WW2 from the German perspective. So viewer discretion is advised.
@jsrjsr61053 ай бұрын
Post-war propaganda that generals made no mistakes…it was all AH’s fault.
@mis4nthr0p33 ай бұрын
@@jsrjsr6105Not like Schicklegruber could defend himself
@vladimator18422 ай бұрын
From what I've gathered so far, the view from the German perspective is most accurate and runs parallel with what the general view of the war is, as per the west!!
@FBT93563 ай бұрын
Should’ve never had declared war on the united states
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
Hitler had no common or any other kind of sense
@vanpaul1473 ай бұрын
Or Russia
@jokodihaynes4193 ай бұрын
Stalingrad was the beginning of the end for the Germans
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
No, the battle of Moscow and the Russian counter attack was the beginning of the end.
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
Also have you ever visited Volvagrad?, the fields South are still littered with tank part's and......fields of bones, skull's, spines, and long bone's.
@vanpaul1473 ай бұрын
Barbarossa was
@tarimdarya3 ай бұрын
Ideologically-driven lies
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
The German's drank too much
@-Sierra117-3 ай бұрын
Wouldnt you
@AnthonyOMulligan-yv9cg3 ай бұрын
@@-Sierra117- after not during or before
@eoofun52433 ай бұрын
Love SLICE history. Thank you guys for what you do. Germany could have won it. If they would have finished the British at Dunkirk, that would have been all she wrote. And even after that, they could have beat the Soviet Union if their racist ideology didn’t have them follow a miserable military strategy of killing and enslave. But even after all that, they could have won at Stalingrad if it was viewed as a siege but they strategically retreated and did a 2nd offensive after winter and they got use to the terrain. The German generals were so much better then they could have been in Russia. Their hands were tied with Hitler’s ego after his defeat of France. Poland started the end for the Germans. They captured all these countries, but couldn’t utilize them.