1951 Dodge Truck Sales Training Film - The Most For You - Dodge vs Ford

  Рет қаралды 29,674

MyMopar. com

MyMopar. com

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 46
@fubarmodelyard1392
@fubarmodelyard1392 3 жыл бұрын
Back when trucks were built for work with real beds unlike the sissified urban statements of today.
@johnellis2347
@johnellis2347 2 жыл бұрын
All began offering 8' boxes and dodge centered theirs. Not listed were 10' beds by some for sprinkler pipe. You could hold the dodge or any cooled auto with gas all day as their is no metal or clutch connection only oil to oil and dodge cooled theirs. Up hunting in the mud the high revving ford v8's and overhead chevies pickups would not lug down and spin out so we would push them up the hill with our old 47 Dodge pickup.
@95blahblahhaha
@95blahblahhaha Жыл бұрын
They don't have heated/cooled seats, self driving, 22in rims, 12 speakers, or a 15in infotainment screen..... How will we ever be able to get any work done???? 😱😱😱😱🤔🤔🤔
@displayfireworks1
@displayfireworks1 7 жыл бұрын
A 1951 Dodge 1/2 Ton pickup with a 6.5 ft bed was.. $1293.00 Panel was $1493.00 The Dodge ram hood ornament was changed to an option this year.
@postal_the_clown
@postal_the_clown 2 жыл бұрын
Grandpa was a Dodge guy. He had the '53 version pickup. Dad was a Chevy guy. He had the '53 Chevy pickup. Dad went through 2 Chevys before Grandpa gave up the Dodge. The moral? They're both gone now and I drive a Ford.
@MrJEEPJT
@MrJEEPJT 2 ай бұрын
Take the time to watch a “SHORT” video by you tuber “@jackhfletcher” Another Stupid Ford Design” it’s a short video hi-lights Fords new wet belt design oil pump belt which is on the “5.0” V-8’s and the eco-boost engines from 2018 ? ? ?
@mickeybitsko1676
@mickeybitsko1676 2 жыл бұрын
Nice to hear cholly Chan do the pidgin American accent
@darkko1969
@darkko1969 4 жыл бұрын
Interesting that the shorter wheelbase in the Dodge is an advantage for 1951. In later years however, the longer wheelbase that the Dodge's had is better.
@philojudaeusofalexandria9556
@philojudaeusofalexandria9556 Жыл бұрын
Just like in their car videos. Sometimes chrysler's body-on-frame is an advantage, other times its unibody makes it better than the competition.
@80fordmustang6
@80fordmustang6 9 жыл бұрын
The guy asking about the interior sounds slightly drunk
@7camscdan249
@7camscdan249 10 жыл бұрын
The guy speaking sounds like a younger Bob Barker...
@glorifiedng
@glorifiedng 10 жыл бұрын
The guy being sold to sounds a little bit like Groucho Marx
@WKZworks
@WKZworks 9 жыл бұрын
A parking brake on the driveshaft, a torque converter between the clutch and engine. I have to say I'm very impressed by a vehicle like this from back in '51. But this also begs another question: How much of a nightmare is it to get parts for these things nowadays? Anyone have experience in restorations?
@RobertPlattBell
@RobertPlattBell 8 жыл бұрын
+WKZworks parking brake on the driveshaft was very common in vehicles from the 30's and 40's. My 1948 Jeep had one. Well, had is the word, as the previous owner took it off, and yea, parts were a bit hard to find, which is why I never replaced it.
@austinpowers1514
@austinpowers1514 7 жыл бұрын
I don't think it's hard at all, trucks aren't as valued as other cars
@jamesslick4790
@jamesslick4790 7 жыл бұрын
Can't be that much of a "nightmare" keeping these running. I knew a guy who had a '52 1/2 ton Dodge Pickup that he used (as a pickup,not a "show" vehicle) as late as 2000 (he might still...I moved away, so who knows?) This vintage of 6 Cylinder MoPars seem to still have plenty of support, and yet are still rather affordable!
@stubs1227
@stubs1227 5 жыл бұрын
There's no way I want that Chinese made dodge.
@markc7367
@markc7367 4 жыл бұрын
Too bad Dodge didnt know how to hire good marketing people back in the 50s.
@samyza200
@samyza200 7 жыл бұрын
I think my grandfather only payed about 1000$ for his 51 dodge
@jessec.5727
@jessec.5727 6 жыл бұрын
Now this is great video I appreciate these old dealer videos, but notice that at the beginning it says it only compares the dodge to the ford with the 6 cylinder why? Because dodge only offered 6 cylinders ford had the v8 option lol
@Jobratedman
@Jobratedman 4 жыл бұрын
The Ford V-8 was not much more power or torque than the Mopar six. Not a real difference.
@Nobody-nz6vy
@Nobody-nz6vy 4 жыл бұрын
Because then ford would look better than dodge, it’s all about the marketing
@randymagnum143
@randymagnum143 4 жыл бұрын
The 6 was more powerful than the v8, unless you got the big v8 in the big trucks. Then they had massive overheating problems due to the exhaust traveling through the block from the valves all the way across the block. Thats what the ardun hemi heads were for, to make the v8 reliable under heavy load.
@randymagnum143
@randymagnum143 4 жыл бұрын
@@Nobody-nz6vy the ford 6 had 115, the v8 only 100.
@redtra236
@redtra236 Жыл бұрын
The ford V8 was super outdated though basically an engine from the 1930s. Some 6 cylinders had more power.
@angeldavila4669
@angeldavila4669 8 жыл бұрын
great video! I have a barn find like this truck, super rare. If you know anyone who needs a project contact me. all original.thanks.
@loveisall5520
@loveisall5520 2 жыл бұрын
As usual, poor Mopar format with some unnecessary smart-a** trying to play devil's advocate. Compare this with the Jam Handy presentations for GM/Chevy; you'll see the difference between a winner's confidence and a loser's sour grapes. I'd buy one of these Dodges new today--minus the jerk.
@DamnStraightM35A2
@DamnStraightM35A2 5 жыл бұрын
First time I've ever heard a manufacturer recommend holding a vehicle on a hill using the torque converter and not the brakes. I'm sure it wouldn't last long in practice though.
@daleostrom3613
@daleostrom3613 5 жыл бұрын
After watching this, my thoughts are, THIS HAS TO BE A FORD COMMERCIAL.
@williamanderson7074
@williamanderson7074 6 жыл бұрын
I'll take the big block 337 ford flathead V8.
@randymagnum143
@randymagnum143 4 жыл бұрын
Then you'll need a 2-1/2 ton or bigger truck, and plan on a set of aftermarket heads if you plan on working it. It'll overheat under heavy use. Of course, you could get a 413 cubic inch 6 from Dodge, with dual carburetors and exhaust. It'll provide rated power under *all* conditions, and won't overheat.
@timpriddy349
@timpriddy349 5 жыл бұрын
Ford looked better....jobbies were not attractive
@RobertPlattBell
@RobertPlattBell 8 жыл бұрын
Wow, this is so racist, at least at the beginning. But that was the style at the time...
@Trendyrapslut
@Trendyrapslut 8 жыл бұрын
how about picking up a dictionary and looking up that word that you used.
@RobertPlattBell
@RobertPlattBell 8 жыл бұрын
Uh, yea, a white guy faking a stereotypical Asian accent? That's racist.
@flcl64
@flcl64 7 жыл бұрын
China is not a race. Making fun of Americans for being Asian is racist. Making fun of the Chinese from China is not.
@diamonddog257
@diamonddog257 7 жыл бұрын
from Canada: do any Americans know what 'racist' means ??? It doesn't mean 'bigotry'....... If you call a ..... Filipino a Filipino ... that is a racist comment .... So the fuck what ? ........................-anyway, the whole thing sounds dodgy...."""
@jamesslick4790
@jamesslick4790 7 жыл бұрын
diamonddog257 To be fair the film strip itself is Dodgey, LOL.
1950 Dodge vs Ford Trucks Dealer Promo Film - Geared to Your Job
18:41
1940s DODGE TRUCK PROMOTIONAL FILM   "BUILT TO 'TAKE IT'"  46954
10:31
PeriscopeFilm
Рет қаралды 546 М.
Long Nails 💅🏻 #shorts
00:50
Mr DegrEE
Рет қаралды 17 МЛН
The IMPOSSIBLE Puzzle..
00:55
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 184 МЛН
Молодой боец приземлил легенду!
01:02
МИНУС БАЛЛ
Рет қаралды 2,1 МЛН
1955 Desoto Fireflite vs. Oldsmobile 98 Dealer Promo Film
15:53
MyMopar. com
Рет қаралды 68 М.
ENGINE SWAP TIME!! 1951 Dodge Truck Gets NEW ENGINE!!
11:51
ParoDoXz
Рет қаралды 167 М.
GM's Best Truck Invention Failed Horribly
10:01
Green Hawk Drive
Рет қаралды 193 М.
Fisher Body Builds for GM
13:01
King Rose Archives
Рет қаралды 238 М.
1947 Job Rated Dodge Trucks -- From the Factory to YOU!
28:16
SomethingWeirdDotCom
Рет қаралды 49 М.
Confidential Report on the 1957 Desoto Firesweep Dealer Promo Film
23:18