1963 Chrysler Turbine

[@jimsmith9034]

My father was an owner of a Dodge dealership in the Chicago area. He was able to bring a Turbine Car home, and drive it for a few days. I rode in it! I remember him telling me that it would run on just about any fuel. We used kerosene. He also mentioned that NEVER use leaded gas. It was a really cool car.

[@mmpiforall5913]

I wonder if any got stolen!

[@Barbarra63297]

My uncle was a manager at a Chrysler dealership and he got one of these and I'll tell ya what, I was 10 years old and I fell absolutely in love with that car. I didn't want to get out when we got back to his house lol.

[@peppermartin2079]

In 1963 during summer vacation from University I was driving along a boulevard around Love Field in Dallas Texas. As I pulled away from a light change my clunker was passed by the quietest and sleekest car I has ever seen. I hadn't heard it pull along side, but as it quickly moved ahead I heard a strange whining sound which went up in pitch as the car accelerated away from me smoothly and effortlessly. I was amazed at the beauty and powerful sound of that astonishing vehicle. I HAD TO GET ONE SOMEDAY!!

[@BH195829]

Can not believe you did not go through the starting sequence and record the noises… you guys need to know we love that aspect.

[@PhantomWoIf]

is there any video with model or another production turbine car where they do that ?

[@Jonathan-dq8hb]

​@@PhantomWoIfYes. Search for Jay Leno's in depth video - he owns one.

[@jarmstrong2843]

As a grade school student over 60 years ago, my grade school teacher was one of those lucky people who Chrysler chose to test drive this car. I think she had it about a year or so. It was cool listening to this car since it sounded like nothing else on the road. If one were to drag race the car, there would be a lag getting the car to move. But once that lag ended, the car came on like gang busters in acceleration. It is a vehicle that is still far ahead of vehicles made today.

[@elrobo3568]

My brother in law worked at a Chrysler dealer in the Bronx. He let me drive a turbine car for a few miles and I was very impressed in the technology. I also watched the demonstration in the showroom where there was a beaker attached to the fuel system and the engine was run with a number of fluids to show it would run on almost any combustible. They put in Seagrams Vo, Vitalis hair oil and several other liquids, very impressive. I do remember it was very slow from a start and pedestrians in a crosswalk didn't appreciate the hot exhaust.

[@djplonghead5403]

The exhaust was cooler than a traditional engine

[@leokimvideo]

Small turbine with a battery powered car. Would solve every problem related to battery cars with limited range and long recharging. Wake up auto industry

[@mmpiforall5913]

Only problem is hi fuel burn and pollution and fires! My RC turbine was fun until the fire!

[@tabithiajones2511]

It has already been done. There's hybrids that use rotary engines to lengthen battery range.

[@wildcoyote34]

@@mmpiforall5913 chrysler solved the heat problem with the regenerators that pulled heat from the exhaust and heated the intake air ,,what eventually killed the automotive turbine engine was inability to meet ever more stringent emissions laws just like the man said

[@slicksnewonenow]

I've always wondered why some manufacturer hasn't pursued Steam Technology. Abner Doble had the automotive steam engine just about as perfected as it could have been, back in the early Thirties... Just think of what could be done with the platform now!

[@bruceblackmar9942]

The World's Fair of 1964 & 1965 inspired the early teen age boy that anything was possible. To this day a model still sits in display to remind us what is possible. Thank you for bringing back the real car to share.

[@scarbourgeoisie]

Every time I look at this car, Thunderbirds always came to mind. Now I know why.

[@jibzz4749]

Why?

[@scarbourgeoisie]

@@jibzz4749 Study the "Bullet Bird's" styling and you'll eventually figure it out. If you still don't get it, don't sweat it, not everybody sees the 3D image in the picture.

[@jibzz4749]

I see it from the front

[@scarbourgeoisie]

@@jibzz4749 Exactly! Roofline is similar as well.

[@jibzz4749]

Yah, I see it now

[@rhargarther1]

Amazing. I wish they would bring a car out like this today.

[@cornellrosiu8818]

My Dad was a Chrysler turbine car program technician at Greenfield lab in Dearborn through 60's. In 1970 he was transferred to air emissions due to the Clean Air Act which killed the Chrysler turbine. I lived this and grew up 1-block from the Ford engineering complex in west Dearborn. Chrysler engineering was far superior to Ford at that time!

[@goldgeologist5320]

Engineering might have been better but the quality of the produced product off the production was far lower. And that is a shocking but true statement.

[@williamhanlon8159]

Someone had one of these in my home town, Skokie Illinois, and I would here coming and recognize it immediately. I was 16 and thought it was the coolest thing ever.

[@gvet47]

Jay Leno's was a great fun to watch as he drove it so we could all see and hear it. 👍

[@xiaoxiaoxiao686]

I’m 15 and I’m in love with this car.

[@skibootdier9488]

I'm 57 and I love 💘 this car..

[@martinleicht5911]

I'm152 and luv this car !! 🍺 😎 👍

[@ghjgjihjgjyrdrgydsgr137]

Watch the video to see it driven, at 17:36 they drive it for only a few seconds, but they thought we viewers would enjoy dull music more than the sound of the vehicle.

[@charlesorcharlenepastore4657]

That shit pisses me off so much to no end . You'd watch a chip fus show. And they would build this bad ass car with an awesome engine with this bad ass exhaust system. So as soon as they would crank up the engine , They'd start playing this load rock in roll drum bang and electric guitar bullshit all the way through till they would shut the engine back off

[@xiaoyu88]

@@charlesorcharlenepastore4657 I hate chip fus

[@wildcoyote34]

if you want to see and hear it drive watch the episode of jay lenos garage featuring the turbine car ,,,i'll save you the suspense on what it sounds like ,, the sound is comparable to a big vacuum cleaner

[@pxdemar]

@@charlesorcharlenepastore4657 Me too

[@gf4353]

In 1967 I bought an XKE JAGUAR from a lot in Miami. Previously owned by a Dr. Je had it painted Chrysler Turbine Bronze. Beautiful, just beautiful. I think of getting one painted the same some day. !!!!!

[@williamwintemberg]

I saw this car when I was a kid, running on a track at the New York Worlds Fair. As I remember, there was a lot of interest in this car.

[@johneddy908]

The Chrysler Turbine car was the best of both worlds: American planned, designed and assembled, with an Italian-built body.

[@danhouy4626]

When I was in grade school we were assigned to do a report on a current subject, and this what my report was, I thought it was facinating.

[@philipneagle8793]

Beautiful car. So sad they had to destroy so many of them. My dad had a 1966 Chrysler 300 in that color. Too bad they used music in the video when they drove it instead of trying to record the actual sound of the car as they drove it around. Great video

[@dmoore7519]

Why do people put a thumbs down on this? It was experimental just like electric vehicles. Pie in the sky thinking.

[@jesperlett]

Because people watching the video expect to see and hear the car in action and became disappointed after patiently watching through all the talking.

[@Marc816]

While driving on an Interstate through Providence, RI in the summer of 1964, I saw one of these cars on the side of the road with its hood up. Several people were milling around it, and there was smoke coming up from the engine compartment.

[@alm7707]

I had the good fortune to see this car in 1964 in Saskatoon Saskatchewan when I was 10.

[@lancenorton3747]

I would love to own a car like that.so beautiful.

[@jefferysmith3930]

From the days where the future was so bright, you had to wear shades. A decade or so after this Chrysler introduces “Lean Burn”. Oh dear!

[@robertansley6331]

This is the very best review of the Turbine car, no disrespect to Jay Leno. Thanks!

[@DesultoryDilettante]

Shud see the movie The Lively Set starring Frankie Avalon and Annette Funicello (1964). It got some Turbine cars from Chrysler. Might have been a promo for the car (made my 13 yr old self a believer).

[@motocrossking84able]

Can these engine type ideas be brought back and enhanced by our modern understanding of how jet engines work?

[@4406bbldb]

Yep. Originally we had some tech but no where near what mattered. For instance if the compressor stage is spinning the fuel can shut off and the engine will seamlessly draw fuel and ign to produce power. Today a really small hybrid system could easily operate the compressor stage. The fuel economy is poor normally but with the fuel turned off it greatly improves (really haa.) The car gets the same fuel consumption at a stop light as it did at 70 mph so city mileage was horrendous. Im done.

[@christopherohlerich1034]

@@4406bbldb thanks so much for that, grateful for the wisdom and knowledge. Valuable stuff. Cars are great , huh ?

[@_joshua_g59_90]

That car is truly beautiful

[@job38four10]

Great detail on what a turbine car is, the first car I seen where the back end looks ten times better then the front. Kinda strange that a motor with lot less moving parts cost lot more money to build.

[@wildcoyote34]

@Job38 Four the problem with a turbine and it's cost isn't the number of moving parts it's PRECISION because it does spin 50,000 rpm it has to be very precisely balanced engines of the time were built to tolerances plus or minus .002 2 thousandths of an inch ,,turbines are built to much tighter tolerances and that takes time and increases cost, ,jet engines today are still hand built 1 unit at a time

[@steved3702]

Hand-built prototypes are always like that. Budget on 10x the cost and even more for the very first ones.

[@randolphkummer2720]

Fascinating piece of automotive history! Thank you guys for that very well moderated insight. Would have been too good to be true, wouldn't it?

[@jimpuff8409]

I saw one at the ‘64, ‘65 New York Worlds Fair . So Cool 😊

[@Abelsgarage_]

The way they kept pronouncing “ Turbine ( Tur-Bain) “ as “ Tur-bin “ honestly bothered me a lot ..

[@orangesunshine1967]

Agreed... its even written on the car & they still cant pronounce turbINE

[@LynxStarAuto]

Blame Chryco. They themselves pronounced it as such. Look up all their promotional content of this vehicle...

[@ghostinyourattic3545]

You and me both, in fact it bothers me so much I couldn't finish the vid, just made me mad 😂😂😂

[@Crossbones6679]

@@LynxStarAuto Then they're idiots as well. a turbin is a middle eastern person wears on their head.

[@hivac]

I think you should try to sue him over that. He would love that.

[@leekumiega9268]

When trying to explain how the turbo engine moves the car it could of been likened to a turboprop plane ,where the turbine shaft through gear reduction turns the propeller but in this case turns the transmission input shaft.

[@zaphodsrealm1549]

I saw one while waiting at the school bus stop when I was a kid... very cool!

[@gedigi9010]

Such a cool car

[@francoismonast4186]

Très bon résumé hystorique de ce mythique produit d'une époque révolue, merci.

[@ChannelWright]

A+ on the talking, F- on the driving - guys, I want to HEAR the engine, I want to SEE the car on the road (and what is it like to SHIFT it?) those are the FUN parts. You couldn’t have been more clueless if you’d been Mr. Spock!

[@doogiehowser78]

j leno has a video of the one he owns

[@jesperlett]

I agree

[@pxdemar]

Agree... Wth .

[@crankychris2]

367 subs, this guy better keep his desk job, or else he will wind up in a pup tent in Portland. Who wants to hear a turbine run?

[@watchman-pu7tp]

Interestingly, they don't shift. These things used a modified Chrysler automatic, I think it was a Torqueflite, without first and second gear, and without the torque converter. Because of the high RPM's of the output impeller, it was connected directly to the transmission's input shaft through a 10:1 gear reduction. It didn't need a torque converter because the output impeller wasn't mechanically linked to the turbine engine's shaft. It was driven by the thrust of the engine, so when the car was not moving, the impeller wasn't rotating, even though the engine was. Because they lacked 1st and second gear, acceleration wasn't that great on these cars. My uncle, who drove Chrysler products, was lucky enough to drive one. He got the hookup from one of his patients who happened to be in charge of one of the maintenance shops, (the one for the Southeastern US), that Chrysler set up specifically to maintain the Turbine cars.

[@AJ-qn6gd]

In the U.K. the Rover car company also worked on turbine engines and raced them at Le Mans in conjunction with BRM one of which finished 10th in 1965. The Rover P6 was developed to be fitted with a turbine engine and consequently had a large engine bay to allow such a fitting but this engine option sadly never materialised.

[@felipeflores8671]

×o>

[@johnryan2193]

You have to find the ingenuity of CHRYSLER ENGINEERING top class .this is amazing .

[@nickpanaritis4122]

My favorite car of all time.

[@ivannegrin711]

AWESOME GREAT tour of of an outstanding work of enginuity

[@thejudgefrom69]

I love my judge I don’t have.. but that car is one of the most rarest and cool cars of the 60s

[@peterdwyer4609]

I just love everything about this car,except the price

[@stansmith4054]

This may be a dumb question but are those cars dependable for everyday driving?

[@robertphillips6296]

Yes the people who drove them wanted to keep them.

[@toyotapartsguy3597]

I was a 19 year Chrysler employee and loved it. When FCA took over they really messed it up. Fiat trying to become a world wide company overnight it seemed. Parts on back order and no support for the customer. That might work in Italy but not here!

[@unlimitedcreativity6630]

This car is from 1960s. If we use modern technology to build a jet car, how good would it be?

[@conspiracyscholor7866]

We wouldnt, the oil companies wouldn't allow it.

[@DinoAlberini]

Conspiracy Scholor right. They are very troubled with high consumption

[@Buc_Stops_Here]

Here is the true story, they were too expensive to manufacturer, they did not get better mileage than a combustion engine, and they were very slow to accelerate. blog.consumerguide.com/1963-64-chrysler-turbine-car-real-world-walk-around/

[@robertrowland5813]

@@Buc_Stops_Here Thanks for the link!

[@waynethurman2144]

I saw one being driven around Woodmont Blvd in Nashville, TN

[@cturdo]

This would be a great alternative fuel solution using new generation of small turbines in today's smaller cars.

[@4406bbldb]

Did you ever see Don Berry in your research? I look for pictures of me and they are scarce because cameras where not allowed around our projects. I drove one of these to do cold start test for along time around highland park.

[@pjg1216]

By any chance, do you know what number this car was? There is a small square block on the inside windshield chrome between the visors above the rear view mirror... Thanks

[@carlthornton3076]

Very Good!...

[@phantomcruizer]

Turbine Direct had issues but, Turbine Electric has got possibilities. Popular Science did an article about a home built “Turbine Electric” car decades ago…very compelling! In fact there was a startup car company (years before Tesla) called ‘Rosen Motors’, they were going to sell turbine electric cars but, for some reason they never went into production! PBS did a video on them if you can find it…very interesting .

[@justanothercomment416]

The project continued into the 1980s. That's when they determined the $10k turbine price tag was too excessive. That determination wasn't in the 1960s. Still, $10k in the 1980s was still a lot of money. In 1964, that would be the equivalent fo $100,000 today. They would have known right up front the mass production cost of a turbine was cost prohibitive. Not to mention they would have noticed spending $5.5 million, plus, just on engines, during the manufacturing of their initial 55 cars. Heck, in the 1960s you could buy a new plane, fully equipped, for $14,000. My mother bought a new car in 1977 for $12,000. Aside from this huge blunder in timeline, the video is very good.

[@Jonathan-dq8hb]

It was clear by the late '60's that the cars were too expensive to produce. But the program continued. The DOE got involved in the 1970's, and helped provide funding. The last turbine car built was a 1980 Mirada.

[@justanothercomment416]

@@Jonathan-dq8hb Ironically, we now have the technology to make them affordable for all.

[@Mcfreddo]

Amazing.

[@jimblack-x4e]

But the oil companies quelled it. It didn't need crude oil actually.

[@billstewart2425]

An icon in technology

[@heyrod59]

Would've been nice to hear it run.....

[@janmarucha9138]

actually super-disappoining - it doesn't make anything near classy sound of old car, rather high-pitched sound of starting jet

[@mickmuzzmkmz1628]

Watch Jay Leno's Garage, he shows it starting, running, and driving. Also, there are other videos which show it's sound. It's actually really quiet, with a hint of turbine noise.

[@johnbockelie3899]

Batman had one on TV in 1966.

[@johnbockelie3899]

Go to your local air force base for repairs.

[@donnovicki9771]

Saw one when I was a kid. Someone had one here and I remember seeing it drive by. Even then it was magical and worked well but since it didnt need gasoline it was killed.

[@Buc_Stops_Here]

No, it was killed because they were too expensive to make and the mileage was no better than gas cars, with slower acceleration. Here is the true story - and it is not because of the reason you gave: blog.consumerguide.com/1963-64-chrysler-turbine-car-real-world-walk-around/

[@jasoncentore1830]

@@Buc_Stops_Here Your 100% Correct Sam. It's a cool car, but for the $ it should have the power of a 455SD

[@MickeyMousePark]

@@Buc_Stops_Here Very true..i have seen an article that estimates that the MSRP for the 1963 Turbine would have been about $13,000-$14,000 as a comparison a top of the line 1963 Cadillac went for $6000 and a 1963 Ford Galaxy 500 MSRP was $3,000

[@Buc_Stops_Here]

@@MickeyMousePark Yes, expensive as heck, slower acceleration, and worse fuel economy. There is a reason this never went anywhere. Electric cars have a better future.

[@travelingwithrick]

Whatever happened to the GM Firebird lll Gas Turbine Car?

[@paulpeterson4320]

All three Firebirds still exist. Jay Leno has done videos on them.

[@johnbockelie3899]

The gasoline industry probably hated it.

[@davebull1972]

there is an E in the word Turbine... and you don't wear it on your head ... lol

[@noneofyourbusiness2750]

I hate when words get mispronounced.

[@werealldoomed-uk]

@@noneofyourbusiness2750 always by americans lol

[@noneofyourbusiness2750]

@@werealldoomed-uk Right on brother!

[@zulumax1]

When driving the car, wanted to hear the car, not filler background music.

[@Ecoscienceczar]

What!!??? We never got to hear it run!!!

[@KanishQQuotes]

How does the car feels driving in say crawling in traffic

[@richardarcher3435]

What a fascinating car, but I didn't know they built them up to 1983. Where are those cars? I can't find any other Chrysler turbine cars other than this 1963 model

[@crankychris2]

Chrysler built these cars for 2 years, 1963-64. Although the turbine engine development continued until 1979, the turbine engine couldn't compete in acceleration, fuel economy, or cost. It was a complete and costly failure for them.

[@richardarcher3435]

@@crankychris2 I have never understood this need for fast acceleration. For sports cars yes, but the average family car doesn't need sports car acceleration. Shame it failed on fuel economy and cost. A fascinating car, I've still got an unfinished 1:25 scale kit of one that I bought in my teens.

[@Jonathan-dq8hb]

The last two cars , a Mirada and a modified LeBaron were found at a nuclear power plant . They were acquired by Stellantis and are in storage awaiting restoration.

[@cybair9341]

Would have been interesting to know the MPG's.

[@cheyennes654]

These cars can run forever only need fuel to start , they run on compressed air , this is why indy car banned them , if I dont have to stop for fuel and you do I'll stay in front , air is free so we have to buy fuel !!!

[@ayoutubechannel921]

@@cheyennes654 sounds like perpetual motion to me, which is impossible

[@tjlovesrachel]

@@cheyennes654 ummmmm…. You’re mildly confused

[@cheyennes654]

@@tjlovesrachel not CONfused at all , you have been lied to AGAIN , you believe in sh0ts a well probably !!!

[@tjlovesrachel]

@@cheyennes654 another smart assed know nothing running their mouth…You are confused as to how turbine/jet engines work… they need fuel to burn and create expanding gases to spin the turbine and create thrust or drive whatever they are connected too….if your talking about the wind mill action that turbines have why is it that once you cut the fuel off they shut down…or if you feel that movement has something to do with it why is it that jet planes carry so much fuel??…. And shots… lmaooo I’m totally pureblooded 100% unvaccinated from covid….. watch who you run your mouth to you might do it to the wrong person one day.

[@darkoz1692]

When the past was more advanced than the present

[@cgpyper7536]

Outstanding presentation. Thanks men.

[@ayoutubechannel921]

The driving part was spoiled by the music, you had the all of the video but you chose to put it there

[@65gtotrips]

For some reason, I’m focused on the hood hinges…they don’t look like anything comparable to the scissor type found in most American cars of the era.

[@scottn7cy]

OMG where did this guy come from? It's like listening to a lawyer describe cars.

[@fredhamster8341]

Bjour,what about nitrous oxyde please

[@matttucker5786]

Would have been nice if we could hear it run

[@SacredSalad]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZWmppeEiNmclbM

[@davew7940]

It started interesting, then we never got to hear the engine idle or perform at speed.... the 10 seconds they drove it had ridiculous music drowning any chance of hearing a rare engine. Car enthusiasts want to hear performance specifications and actual engines running, not how many times you can discuss the cooling fin styling on the rear view mirror.....just awful.....

[@wildman6936]

I agree, would’ve loved to hear the motor running instead of the music

[@catlovermarty]

Watch Jay Leno's video of him driving it. It's really cool!

[@Cobra428SCJ]

Ford built-in experimented with turbine engines in the 50s. A turbine 55 Ford Thunderbird caught the grass on fire.

[@andydanko7074]

Jay Leno's review on his turbine car is way better than this one

[@freebird7284]

jay Leno drives his!

[@pauldwight9188]

Doe's a J/T R0cket fitt in the trunk ?

[@joeaxe]

Badass car.

[@manuelibrahim3543]

I want to know how fast is it 🤔

[@Jonathan-dq8hb]

Top speed is roughly 130 mph.

[@modeljetjuggernaut4864]

Great overview on the car but when I finally got to see it drive, I wanted to HEAR IT, not the pseudo-rock-n-roll soundtrack

[@colinnuttall9579]

Looking back on the ‘Cars Of The Future’ made in the 1950’s & 60’s is interesting. To me it demonstrated minds more interested in aesthetics and their version of fashion. In reality, nobody drives cars with bubble canopies. Radiant heat makes it impractical, and it appears nobody thought about that. Nobody drives the stupid looking rocket or jet fighter styles cars they promised either. We are far more interested in practicalities, fuel usage, safety, road holding, comfort etc. we want to know we can fit practical loads in and that they perform sufficiently for our needs, and I don’t mean 1/4 mile times or other nonsenses. These cars of the fifties were ridiculous flights of fancy, thrust on us by people who had no idea of our needs. Obviously they couldn’t have foreseen microchips and software, but it seems to me they didn’t get much right. It was all a bit ‘Tomorrowland, by Disney.’

[@fido0825]

Why does the author keep referring to "cooling fins" with respect to the styling touches? Wouldn't those styling elements reflect the internal fan blades of the turbine engine"s compressor and not cooling fins as might be seen on aircooled piston engines like motorcycle engines? Certainly the compressor blades and driven blades inside the engine wouldn't be serving as "cooling fins".

[@DiederikAms]

So extremely annoying that the ONLY bit where Steve is driving the car, some insensitive sound engineer decided to run some middle of the road guitar noise over it. Now we still can't here what a turbine engine sounds like. Really a missed opportunity and taking away the attractiveness of this car review big time.

[@theresathomas4368]

liten to it here kzbin.info/www/bejne/eZWmppeEiNmclbM

[@Ecoscienceczar]

Do we hear it run?

[@mmpiforall5913]

Say! No info on the transmission used! Any details guys??

[@johanbrand8601]

It used the 3 speed TorqueFlite.

[@Buzbikebklyn1]

The jet car was not that original. It looks like my 1962 Thunderbird in reverse. As a matter of fact it was designed by the same guy. At a quick glance it even looks like the 61 to 63 Thunderbird. Jay Leno actually has one, he says it's slow and loud, but a one of a kind car. Only 2 still exist. This guy has one, Leno has the other.

[@howiefeltersnatch2973]

And one at the Chrysler Proving Grounds. I got to see it in person in 2004 along with a crash test of a PT Cruiser lol

[@lakemi4665]

Chrysler headquarters in background at 2:00 & 20:00 minutes, just north of DETROIT

[@fairfaxcat1312]

I’m a nervous wreck. How do they keep the automobile from taking off?

[@V_Vladimir_V]

Игорь немного опоздал, но зато еще много контента будет))

[@jjmac3561]

Its a Turbine, not a Turban.

[@yusifmeherremov4858]

😍😍😍😍👍👍👍

[@angry-white-men]

So i imagine it has an afterburner that would allow you to shoot flames out the exhaust?

[@hankkingsley9300]

Lehto's Law ftw

[@josephebacon]

It so sad that they couldn't make the turbine card feasible.

[@ReevansElectro]

As far as anyone can tell, TURBAN cars are often found in India BUT turbines are found in some 1963 Chrysler cars. Pronounce "turbine" : kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5rUlIR9bbWqlbM

[@halamkajohn]

i tried "warped perception" on youtube. he personally sees no end to liquid fuel. so burning solid fuel has to be tried elsewhere. i have a few diesel designs that burn wood. flathead cars. intermittent turbine battery charger.

[@MicroSD16Gb]

poor choice of words when call it jet, turbine or something like that, more accurately it should be called turbo-shaft engine

[@sf3486]

Was waiting to hear the engine or see it driven. Hmmm

[@pauldwight9188]

D0es it Fly ?

[@derrynf565]

23 min video and you didnt even start it! It looks like every other car but doesnt sound like every other car so why not even start it ffs😠