1967 Pontiac Ventura

The Ventura was first introduced for 1960 as a new higher priced example of the Pontiac's standard full size B-Body model which was shared with the Catalina. This model began with great options like the four-door vista sedan and the two-door hardtop and had a very unique exterior including the deluxe wheel covers, sport steering wheel and even a tri-tone seats. The Ventura went on to become its own series in 1966 through 1969 but was then returned to a custom trim option for the Catalina in 1970.
GR Auto Gallery is pleased to present this highly original example of the 1967 Pontiac Catalina Ventura for your consideration. This fine riding, fine looking ride comes with a lot of great upgrades from the factory, plenty of work completed to keep it in good running order and has even been professionally evaluated to ensure accuracy and integrity of this listing. The exterior shows well with a factory color still on it, the Rally II wheels look in great condition to really set off the overall appearance and hosts a great list of factory upgrades such as power steering, power brakes, air conditioning which should only need a recharge, push button radio with power antenna and 8-track player. The condition shows the care given to this vehicle, the multiple appraisals ensure the accuracy and not enough can be said for the nostalgia both outside and in. Call or email us for any questions you may have on this great example of a rare model!
To see over 80 photos of this car, including under carriage please visit our website www.grautogallery.com

[@alanstrong55]

Pontiac in its days of glory.

[@shwt121]

This is absolutely a beautiful automobile......

[@67marlins]

beautiful- thanks for posting, I wish I could afford it.

[@garyblanchard1084]

The gentleman’s hot rod. Fantastic. I’d run her all the way from Halifax NS to Cabo San Lucas!

[@williammunny7133]

A 1967 Catalina, Burgundy with black interior and a black vinyl top; the speedometer traveled all the way from left to right, I had my best friends beside me. This was some years ago; I'm so glad GOD let us live.

[@AirCargoHeavy]

I ❤ old Pontiacs.

[@richardbrown1234]

Beautiful. What a blast to drive

[@maxxmasson4263]

this car is what made Pontiac great

[@lawrencejankowski9681]

What a highway machine!

[@schkeeperglenn]

What a sweetheart of a car !!!

[@brianmacmac1000]

Now this is a "CAR".

[@thefreebird49]

No country in the world can build cars like USA. God bless the USA.

[@kingkrimson8771]

"Murica!!

[@mckessa17]

Canada built the Bricklin.

[@67marlins]

This is what happens when prosperity, pride and capitalism are all at their best - a solid company allows enterprising divisions to build great cars the public & engineers appreciate. I'm a Ford and Mopar guy, but still proud that GM encouraged & supported Pontiac and Olds to develop such beautifully-styled, capable & fine automobiles. To me, Pontiac and Olds always represented the best of GM, whereas Chevy was cheap and under-engineered by almost any comparison. Pontiac was creative and solid in their performance initiatives, and Olds was always called, 'the experimental car', as my grandfather said, because new technology was usually introduced in that division ( first automatic transmission; V-8 pioneers; first front-wheel drive in practical mass-production; first high-mounted brake lights for safety; first attempt at diesel mass-production; first dent-proof plastic body panels [ I think....]..) As I said, even a Ford guy like me admired Olds' engineering & market initiatives. If I ever fill-out my 'bucket list', I'd be proud of a stable of garage-kept Fords, Mercurys Edsels & Mopars, but also a '66 or '67 Pontiac full-size station wagon based on this sedans styling, loaded with power windows, etc, asleep in my garage until she wants to glide around town for a weekend drive...... Thanks so much once again for posting, friend.

[@67marlins]

​@@mckessa17 and?

[@chesterthawkins7510]

love this.

[@stevefick3919]

Beautiful! I had a 1971 Ventura. Whole new ballgame! No where near as pretty as this!

[@williammunny7133]

America built memories during those years, America has done a great job at building to keep us alive also.

[@elpidiovallejo5735]

Men I like that car yes

[@matthewpaulargall9102]

Very cool car!

[@shwt121]

Great looking finish.....luv the buckets....

[@jeffstrong2993]

I fell in love omg what a gorgeous car how original is it I'm hooked. Especially with that rock crusher 4 speed I couldn't see the badge is it a 428 lmk thanks I'll look at this car every day

[@gordbaker896]

Sad the Engine was not shown.

[@kerwinau3266]

My Grandfather had a 4 door with the 400 4 barrel.

[@wam44]

I'll take one please...

[@BradWilkins]

Why not show the engine and more interior? I don't understand why the video missed so much of the car.

[@joequillun7790]

I agree Brad. A great car, 428 4 spd to boot. Nothing but ground level photography. Too bad.

[@bruceg.6282]

I agree. I'd like to see if it had headers.

[@mrdiplomat9018]

Yeah, ditch the dumb music too 🤡

[@peterhogan9537]

still looks like a car from the future.

[@chrismechanic6164]

Saaaaaaweeeeeeeet!

[@sigmamale7241]

What did they get for this beauty?

[@gtpcruiser02]

This affordable Engineering Marvel was built over 50 years ago. Only American Auto Manufacturers built affordable vehicles that offered what ever the customer wanted. If you desired power, performance, sport handling, economy, luxury it was all available except for safety at times was questionable.

[@roberthorsburgh2996]

Nice!

[@robertsnyder5149]

One beautiful car bar none!

[@hephaestus198]

Wouldn't be a good idea for GM to re-make this magnificent models ? Not a bad ugly modernized (and boring) version but to manufacture something almost identical perhaps the dashboard and interiors could be substantially improved with modern materials etc Would it work ? I would want one if looing really like this classics

[@grautogallery1]

That would be very cool! Unfortunately something like this wouldn't pass safety and emissions regulations. It would be really cool to see though!

[@rgrndu]

Dodge did it with the Challenger. GM could do w/ this.

[@MrTrack412]

The 1967 Pontiac full-size model is rare.

[@bruceg.6282]

This is a beautiful car, but it seems like in 1966 - 1970, the GTO got most of the attention. Turn back the clock and I'll buy one just like this one. Except for the 8 track.

[@Kas8588]

The Pontiac 2+2 Was One Hell Of A Car. The 421 Engine Was One Powerful Thing To Drive. Too Bad They Don't Build These Cars Today. My 65 2+2 Convertible Was One Great Car.

[@craigpennington1251]

They were busy showing the music Brad.

[@daveshaw1547]

i want it

[@bruceg.6282]

Can you say how much it sold for?

[@dbrown6941]

How sad that we once built cars that looked like that, and now all the new cars look alike , and they all look like shiite.

[@markmclendon8621]

8 lug 428 4 speed

[@shwt121]

Is this vehicle still available?

[@zen10ten]

Did Pontiac ever produce a 1967 Ventura SD428 Convertible with a Bench Seat and Automatic Transmission?

[@shawnmcculley2995]

This is pretty much a "2 plus 2."

[@davidkastin4240]

You bet 😀 It's a Mustang killer lol

[@peterhogan9537]

but no louvers.

[@mikec4834]

No one came close to the styling of Pontiac

[@celabud]

Does somebody know the difference between this car, the 2+2 and the Boneville?. They are all the same year, shape and engine.

[@schkeeperglenn]

Catalina ,Ventura and 2+2 were all on a shorter wheelbase than the Bonneville . The Ventura was mostly a trim package while the 2+2 was the performance oriented one of the bunch ,however all the performance options were available on all of them ,as witnessed by this Ventura. When I was growing up ,a neighbor had a 68 Bonneville convertible with the 428 and 4 speed all factory original.

[@celabud]

Glenn Schkeeper Thank you very much. That was very useful information.

[@mightylonesome9426]

@@schkeeperglenn Thanks Glenn. I always thought the Catalina and Ventura were the same wheel base as the Bonneville, less optioned though. Beautiful cars!

[@shwt121]

Well, the Ventura and Catalina did share the same wheelbase; as Bonneville was the longest of the group...They all had the option of the 428 c.i. HO engine which had approx. 375 HP with plenty of torque to go around. I believe the OEM tranny was the hydra-matic THM400 with the option of a Borg-Warner 4spd manual with the 428 HO engine. My first car was a '68 Bonneville with the 428c.i. HO ( my mechanic stated that mine had roughly 375 hp)....I, also had the THM400 automatic tranny, and it being my first car- I was never reminded to do an engine oil chk.....so, basically, with 89,000.0 miles on THE ALREADY oil burning engine, didnt take long BEFORE THIS HO engine ' threw out a piston rod'.....live and learn !!!!!

[@kj475]

Don't forget about the Executive. It was an optioned up Catalina built on the Bonneville wheelbase.

[@davidiverson2541]

Nice car. Not a very good job of showing the engine.