2 inch Titanium vs 50 Cals Baddest Rounds

Headphone warning, for loud impact sounds
Sackin Metals hooked us up with two 1" Titanium plates that we bolted together. We shot 50 cals baddest rounds at it. We shot the SLAP, SLAP-T, Raufoss MK211, MK263 AP, and Israel's API.
We also shot all of these rounds out of a M2HB 50 Cal to get the max speed out of these rounds.
Contact Going Ballistic at; [e-mail]
💥Help support Going Ballistic by becoming a Patron
www.patreon.com/going_ballistic
Check out Sackin Metals at; www.6AL4V.Shop you won't be disappointed. You can also check them out on eBay at: www.ebay.com/u...

[@TexasPlinking]

What a beast of a gun! Paired with that Mk211 especially!

[@GoingBallistic]

They are a beast for sure. I got to shoot a full auto a few time. Those are crazy fun👍

[@jonalarcon8564]

Iv shot those MK211s what makes them so strong is the RDX explosive inside of them ,but at 65 to 100 dollars a round depending on where you buy them , and contrary to popular belief they are not illegal to own but who can afford them

[@cw1161]

Them SLAP rounds are no joke either

[@jonalarcon8564]

@@cw1161 yes iv fired them , but not through a regular barrel , well once but i removed the brake , but most 50s need a brake especially semi autos

[@soup5344]

"If you guys try this at home." Yes I too have two 1 inch Titanium Plates, a modified M2 Browning, .50 BMG API, and 2 bullet resistant panels.

[@TheGooberOfGoobs]

yes we also have enough money to buy 2 machined 1 inch plates of high quality titanium, 180 dollars worth of 50 bmg and a 50 cal on hand lying around under our beds

[@dimagass7801]

Wait everyone doesn't have that sitting around???😮 it's like when they tell you not to try this at home when you go to the circus, yeah I'll make sure I'm not doing trapeze acts in my room🤣

[@RyanKirchman]

Same

[@davidmcclendon583]

Ya I have the 50 BMG 750 GRAIN HORNADY rounds. Titanium LMAO can't afford that!

[@DJIceShanty]

After recent events I’ll forever cringe when I see people shoot .50 SLAP rounds.

[@karolbomba6704]

what happened?

[@luislongoria6621]

An RN-50 had its threaded breech cap come off after firing an unknown number of SLAP rounds, seriously injuring the shooter. Because metal expands when heated, the threads would have to be machined loose enough to allow the breech cap to be removed by hand after firing for the loading procedure, indicating a flawed design

[@theshiftybeef6251]

@@luislongoria6621 there’s a crimp on these slap rounds, there wasn’t on Scott’s. His were homemade by someone.

[@KE458S]

@@luislongoria6621 this is the only time a serbu rn50 has blown up. It was not a design flaw. That slap round Scott shot was about 160k psi, instead of a normal pressure round.

[@stanleymaestas5441]

@@karolbomba6704 Kentucky ballistics had a slap round destroy his .50 caliber single shot gun explode and injure him during filming a video.

[@DarkbaseTTV]

SLAP rounds are just stupid fast.. almost 3k vs almost 4k fps, speed beats armor

[@thegreyghost5846]

If it's well made with the right metal, too brittle and the round will just shatter

[@jonalarcon8564]

Yes iv shot them "SLAP" SABOTED LIGHT ARMOR PIERCING " rounds also, but In most 50 cal rifles its a good idea to first remove the muzzle brake, also if the sabot comes off while traveling down the barrel it can ruin the barrel because slap rounds can wobble down the barrel

[@iichthus5760]

Two plates provide more stopping power because of iterative energy dissipation. Simply put, the energy it takes to penetrate the first layer is spread over an area much wider than the projectile and the point of impact on the second layer is much wider than the point of impact on the first layer. In a single layer of armor a punching shear profile develops with a smaller and more consistent area through the mass... ya, materials engineer. Sorry to nerd out on ya.

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for the comment 👍👍

[@TheExplosiveGuy]

Pretty much the principle behind Whipple plating on spacecraft, the first layer absorbs the initial impact and spreads it out before it hits the second layer of plating which catches the much smaller and lighter peices.

[@bira896]

Makes me wonder, if the second plate was "floating", i.e. loosened bolts to allow it to travel in the plane of the projectile, would it provide even better protection?

[@blacksheep5466]

pretty sure the opposite is true. I have seen test done with steel and they found that 2 inches is better than 2 one inch plates but they did not say why. they found if there was a space between the 1 inch plates then the round would tumble after the first and hit the second sideways most times but together they were not as good as the 2 inch. again not sure why ....

[@bezimienny_andzej6425]

I think quite the contrary. Penetrator has to move the material in front of it to the sides and front, when there is even a tiny bit of gap between plates, material can moved much easier - first the bulge on the back of the plate appears, then the penetrator goes through, moves the metal freely to the sides, then proceeds to do the same with the 2nd plate. With 1 homogenous plate the metal is pushed into the metal, that has nowhere to go. Imagine your penetrator is 0,75 inch into the 2 inch plate. To create a bulge with the metal it pushes in front of it, it has to move 1,25" of titanium! That takes a lot more energy, so pretty much at this point, it pushes metal into metal. And only after it penetrates the whole plate, it can move some metal freely to the sides and front.

[@timewave02012]

M2HB, chronograph, and all the exotic varieties of ammo. I don't think I could have asked for more in a 50 BMG penetration test.

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for the comment, and your welcome 👍

[@glandhound]

Phantom camera

[@theshiftybeef6251]

See the crimp on the slap round? I sure noticed after what happened to Scott.

[@daveh7186]

Scott shot a rifle which had design flaws …

[@Ace28233]

@@daveh7186 No he didnt, He shot a round that was tampered with. Any .50 would have exploded with that round.

[@hardlylivin6602]

I wouldn’t say the M2 isn’t capable of a high level of accuracy. Carlos Hathcock took out a Vietcong soldier at 2,500 yards with one in 1967 with two rounds.

[@redneck3962]

I was just checking the comments to see if anyone else was going to point this out too!

[@grandadmiralthrawn8116]

Was it with a SLAP? They are generally less accurate than the more conventional types of 50bmg (my guess it’s because the lack of a boat tail)

[@glandhound]

Yeah, out of a group of VC and he didn't hit the one he was aiming for. It's not exactly sub MOA, but for an MG that is a good thing. MGs aren't designed to be accurate as they are supposed to be suppressive/area denial which is easier without pinpoint accuracy.

[@glandhound]

@@grandadmiralthrawn8116 They are less accurate due to the sabot. The sub caliber projectile (or penetrator) isn't connected to the barrel rifling so they don't spin while in flight which makes them inherently inaccurate.

[@stevewilson4514]

Grand Admiral Thrawn Nope. SLAP rounds weren’t invented until the late 1980’s. They were first used in Desert Storm.

[@blazeleffler]

2:58 run your playback speed at .5x and look how that ricochet bounces off the dirt 5 feet from his left.... Amazing video guys, please stay safe!

[@abelincon915]

Holy crap thats some attention to detail

[@Am_Cookie2436]

I swear, you are one attentive dude.

[@Am_Cookie2436]

Ok I was actually right before that part, good timing or coincidence I guess. But even without .5x speed you can see the dirt it displaced

[@duggydo]

I'd strongly recommend getting something to cover his noggin and vitals. It could still come back through that crack. See if an armor company will sponsor you if nothing else guys.

[@lordvedire]

Yes, please be safe!

[@briansewelloutdoors8404]

@Yuck Foutube never heard that one before i always thought it was rocket science

[@thevalorousdong7675]

Or just not shoot at steel straight on

[@duggydo]

@@thevalorousdong7675 with those rounds, they can come back at you even if the steel is at an angle. They make a cavity straight in and rebound back. Firsthand experience.

[@bubbs2010]

Eye protection isn't likely to slow down a bullet that penetrated 40mm of Titanium, is it ?

[@Killerean]

The kind of setup you've created there is actually quite interesting. You can find similar protection on spacecrafts where there is two layer protection. The first layer is designed to shatter/destabilize the projectile and the other one catches it. Those are solid layers with a specific gap between them though. Your setup has one more variable in the stretching bolts, giving just enough flexibility to slow down and stop/return the round. I think it would have been interesting to see the first two rounds re-tested with the c clamp setup. I believe this time they would have made it through just like the last two rounds, since the plates would now stay in place.

[@BinaryBlueBull]

Two years later but indeed, on spacecraft it's called a "Whipple shield" or "Whipple armor" if you will. It was invented by Dr. Fred Whipple, an American astronomer. Just some added fun facts

[@whosurdaddy8907]

When shooting the m2, try not sitting on your foot, and put both feet on the cross bar holding the T&E, so you don't have to bend over to get low enough to look through the sights. Also sandbags on the tripod helps alot.

[@kdaltex]

Shoot AR550 sometime! Love to see how SLAP holds up against it.

[@Xtreme_Airgun_Slugs]

@@7150285 what was yours? On this channel? What came of it?

[@Xtreme_Airgun_Slugs]

@@7150285 Noice

[@innerfire-graham9016]

@@7150285 nice!

[@Alexr-uf3zn]

I’d like to see that under the same conditions as well

[@Xularius]

@Andy Geee Tungsten carbide plates would be cool, same material as the SLAP penetrator. 🙂👍

[@unmaskingfools8152]

I am in disbelief how the Israeli round managed to bounce back after going that deep into titanium. Also, how that round is in perfect condition is nuts. If you saw this in movies you would be put off thinking thats just way too unrealistic

[@shiroyt4185]

That's why is should be pointy. The shape of the missile has everything to do with the payload delivery.

[@Qardo]

Now we know. If perfectly shaped .50 cal rounds bounce off the chest of Superman. They are Israeli rounds.

[@kuplung22]

Stronger than titanium?

[@dwwolf4636]

@berkayxj8 TiAlV has a RHA equivalence of about 70%. ERA (and NERA and NxRA ) work by constantly shoving the flyer plates into the HEAT jet as they are bulging due to the explosion.

[@humphrey09applebee61]

Calling bullshit on that round, it is not in the slightest deformed and if you know how energy transfer and bouncing work you do know, that if the round penetrated this far in, it sure as hell does not dig itself out and bounces back. All of this, mind you while being in perfect factory condition. If it did, you should be able to easily recreate the bounce and retrieve another one like that.

[@killian9314]

2:29 for the ISS nasa made tests shooting titanium balls out of a compressed gas canon that reached mach 10 (to simulate space debris, pretty cool) and they use space grade aluminum for armor, they tried 2 things, 1 several inches thick block, and 2 really spaced out fraction of an inch layers, which like a feet separation, they found out the big block got a buge ass hole, because all of the energy was distributed in it, both huge entrance and exit hole, but for the other one, they saw a big defomation on the external layer a big ball, but a small one almost caliber sized hole on the second one, and realized it was better for protection purposes to use size and separation to spend the energy of the proyectile, rather than bigger plates, so they used the second type, and filled the separation with kevlar and some sort of self sealing fluid, so that in the worst case scenario, you have a small hole that went through the station, but it did so like butter and you've got a dutch boy with the dam situation, and not a tank round sized hole in the hull, and in practice, the extra density of the fluid spends the energy more than the solid so it stops it like regular kevlar would do with a small calibre round. hvit.jsc.nasa.gov/shield-development/ here's the link.

[@AgentSmith911]

Those slap rounds seem to slap the vinegar out of these obstacles (I'll show myself out)

[@GoingBallistic]

Lol, roger that👍👍

[@declanc9791]

Mr Anderson

[@gmunz360]

Dude shooting looks identical to Charlie Day

[@jonmeray713]

B!gG bwahahhahahahahahahahaha

[@gmunz360]

@@jonmeray713 all they need is a Frank of guns and we'll be set

[@wyckedan]

So anyways, he started BLASTING

[@Freeknickers24]

6:16 disliked for not showing the vehicle's damage.

[@the1stdavej505]

Going through two plates is harder to do. It’s just like laminated boards.

[@GoingBallistic]

👍

[@Make-Asylums-Great-Again]

Going Ballistic 👍

[@ryanbrown172]

As an engineering student, I would say that maybe shooting through a solid piece would have to overcome shear movement in the center plane of the plate as the plate flexes while the bullet would overcome only the much more negligible surface contact between two plates. Also the plates are more likely to deflect a larger amount if there is two because of this lack of shear resistance and more deflection means more stress. These are just thoughts.

[@TheUltimateWord]

Man pitch your plates forward so the round is deflected down and not back at you.

[@GoingBallistic]

We know. sO many people talked about the plate be at an angle it other videos so we thought we would put some of their theories to rest👍

[@Thedoug369]

That would definitely be my go to move as well. A fiddy coming back at atcha like that could take yer head clean off!

[@m3kid]

Going Ballistic definitely not a theory always want to angle ur iron if there’s a chance of the ricochet reaching u.

[@m3kid]

Going Ballistic but really cool video thanks for sharing.

[@neilwalker8686]

Then it would not be a head on impact. A 1/4” could probably deflect a 50 and keep it from penetrating if angled.

[@jamescole8049]

I don’t understand why Y’all don’t have more views and subscribers

[@machstem6390]

Whistlin diesel would not heed your warnings about safety

[@thatgamerguy6449]

Using a slap round is like using a 5.56 NATO green tip rather than a 7.62 Soviet FMJ. More speed,narrowe tip (harder material),less overall diameter All things for better for penetration

[@lightningxx]

The ma deuce is not a spray and prey weapon. Carlos Hathcock in Vietnam achieved a 2500 yrd kill with his rifle scope mounted on one

[@bezimienny_andzej6425]

Well, the question is, how many rounds did he fire at far-away targets, before he scored that hit? I'm not talking about this specific case, but overal. Machineguns can be fairly accurate, but still at over 1000 yards the dispersion will be pretty severe.

[@IllidanSturmgrimmDeusVult]

@@bezimienny_andzej6425 2 rounds

[@bezimienny_andzej6425]

@@IllidanSturmgrimmDeusVult I didn't mean that particular encounter, but overal - and basically he fired 1 shot, the previous one he used to sight-in the weapon, so it shouldn't be counted, if I got it right. Anyway, you can fire at people at long range for 2 weeks and finally score a hit. Does it mean your weapon is super accurate? We don't know how many times he fired long range and how many of these shots landed. We know that in that particular encounter he landed the 1st shot he fired, but that's it, I'm certain marksmanship was spot on, but it doesn't tell us much about the weapon.

[@nicholaslawrence7658]

@@bezimienny_andzej6425 he also hit a person other than the one he was aiming at

[@GodsGladiator]

We just bought a bunch of belted .50cal which ended up being not as good of a deal cause every 7th round or something is a tracer which we can’t use in our indoor range at work. But least we can sell them separately.

[@GoingBallistic]

Believe me they will sell.

[@voltsoftruthBSbuster]

Furthermore some one in the chat room "ruskitytan" has already pointed out, when there is a gap between plates it allows material to bulge with out infringement, allowing the round to push material out of the way to move to the next plate to do the same. Where as when you have one solid plate the "bulge" has no where to expand and pushes into more material at the back making the metal denser and denser as the round tries to move further into the plate. ( simple experiment, get a few of your friends, say 4 of them. Line them up one standing behind the other person say one foot apart. Now walk up and push the very first person. I guarantee you he will fall back bumping into his friend who will fall back bumping into the guy behind him and so on till they are all on the floor. Now repeat the experiment but this time have each person place his hands firmly on the shoulders of the friend in front of him, with 3 guys that are behind the first friend having their hands extended and placed on the shoulders of the person in front of them. Now push your first friend and see what happens. They won't fall. People here also confusing glass armor that has layers thinking its done cause it makes the window stronger. But glass behaves different than metal and not applicable to this scenario. Glass is layered cause you have hard brittle material, then soft elastic plastic between layers to prevent glass from fracturing and the break traveling the whole length of the glass window.

[@richards.2690]

I can't figure why you would think that 50cal would get anywhere near 4000fps.??? The Ma Duce would let them fly around 2900fps... The last slap got pretty close.... those pressures are a bit over recommended range ???? Haha 😄 🤣!! OK NOW on to thicker material....haha 😄

[@hawkinatorgamer9725]

Im so glad this popped up in my recommended. This was awesome! Love the Ma Deuce!

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for watching 👍👍

[@christianclark2763]

If spaced armor was weaker, they wouldn't use it on tanks. 😉 Can I get a "checkmate"?

[@thewoodweldingfabricator9300]

Good point, though that is mainly for spalling from shaped charges.

[@rickyspanish2435]

To take down Tony Stark use Slap Rounds...

[@MrJont432]

Yeah eye protection will definitely help against 50 cal ricochet.....what?

[@gamebredduckhunter7651]

I think you would have had better results if the plates were clamped together better. Better grade of bolts, more or larger bolts, and or something like the c clamp. You may have to worry about bolts flying back at you though if you have bolts that don’t stretch.

[@richardpeterson3753]

oh shit.i see a slap round.....good luck pal,count fingers and toes before and after fireing,and get your will in order.

[@HSKFabrications]

Lol that's what hit whistlindiesel in the forehead lmao

[@rodrigorosas8966]

Toafladermouse already proofed clapping stuff down not going to change nothing 😂

[@eduardbudin2506]

От Зёбры! Уже почти пересмотрел все Ваши видео! Контент супер!

[@davidstuck2866]

WOW! nearly 4000 fps from the slap rounds! how much over pressure are those things! and no wonder Scott (Kentucky Ballistics) was nearly killed from shooting them. IMO, I would knock those slap rounds apart, and reuse the components. those things will take someone's life if they keep getting shot.

[@deejayriney2031]

Also, I love the vids, boys. Keep ‘um comin’

[@jonny555ive]

I find it funny the guy that's explaining what happened to the Target he's always giving thumbs up and finger guns that makes me laugh. 👍👆👍👆👍👆👍👆👍😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@stefanroppel8238]

I wonder if the other rounds would've went through both plates if they were clamped aswell

[@jonalarcon8564]

Maybe a 220 swift round if they even make it in a AP round , I have a 220 swift and it's definitely a barrel burner at over 4000 fps , im in the process of trying to neck a 220 case down to a 17 caliber , but I have to turn my own custom barrel, also I'd probably have to turn my own solid bullets as well , I wanna say I chronoed mine at 4670 fps

[@mikeropaynus410]

Uh by the time he fired and ducked that round has been sent hit and coming well before you do anything at 75 yards just saying

[@ArmchairDeity]

I just freakin love this series... the amount of money y’all have gone thru with both the rounds and the targets... I hope someday I am able to do something like it... tho... not a copy, just “inspired by”. 🤘🏻😎👍🏻

[@GoingBallistic]

Man you ain’t kidding. We have spent far more then we’ve made. Lol. Some day it will pay off

[@jackjasper5437]

So I can shoot through two brackets 2 in of titanium and then slam into the plexiglass behind it

[@MrTh2869]

Now that’s a lot of damage!!

[@garyeaton5719]

I don't believe that the last rounds went through the plates, if they had you could look through the open holes. What I believe happened the rounds were captured in the plates and the titanium ahead of the projectiles was ejected by the energy of the projectile. The 30mm depleted uranium rounds of the A 10 would actually melt a cone of a tanks armor and spray it inside the tank then the projectile would follow and bounce around. I think you were creating a somewhat lower energy version of that effect. Interesting video and good shooting.

[@bepropheta6665]

Those SLAP rounds have impressive velocity, no wonder they penetrate so well!

[@jackskellingtim1848]

Also real good at detonating an rn-50

[@thevalorousdong7675]

Angle that steel a little to minimize dangerous ricochets

[@vinishshetty8055]

A tungsten round or a DU round coated with tungsten can go through any form of comparative armour

[@jonalarcon8564]

True but the Depleted uranium round is a restricted material round and Civilians can't get them , I know they are manufactured for the A10 s cannon and the Abrams battle tank Dart. Iv never seen them in 50 BMG rounds , iv always wondered why the United States military has never developed a bullet along the same principles of the RPG round with its hot jet of mold copper that burns through most other battle tanks even with reactive armor, i mean the mk 211 round is a good round but it can definitely be improved ,

[@randyhavard6084]

One thicker plate is stronger than 2 plates put together. Don't know the engineer you talk to but they are incorrect. That was figured out in the 1800s while trying to figure out what was best for battleships.

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for the info.

[@maxhammontree3169]

The worse damage I seen in this video was how the shooter was sitting on his foot. It doesn’t hurt now because he is young. Stop now and when you are 40 you won’t have to have knee replacement. Ask me how I know.

[@razechaos3489]

How do you know Max? Genuinely interested. Personal knee replacement or do you work in Orthopedics?

[@ftargr]

Definitely not an authorized firing position

[@notablediscomfort]

Yeah, you'd think they got an M2, they would know to bring a cinder block or sandbag to sit on.

[@notablediscomfort]

What's really weird is he had to lean forward while sitting on his foot so really he should have just sat in the dirt and had a more comfortable position.

[@grasunmajjurach6026]

Verygood verygood I from .thailand พัทลุง..6กพ.64

[@GoingBallistic]

Hello

[@earlharrell7750]

After 53 years as an Aerospace Tool and Die Maker IMHO, the two one inch plates would be much stronger than a single two inch plate. The reason being each of the one inch plates has a super hard "Skin" of condensed Titanium on each side of EACH plate, meaning the round must puncture this skin 4 times instead of puncturing this skin twice on the 2" plate. After machining tons of Titanium during my career, once you cut through the "Skin" this inner virgin material machines more like Aluminum than Nickel Based Alloys like Inconel. As always, I love your content and we will see if the 50 Cal. is up to the task at hand! Earl Harrell

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for the info

[@GryphonArmorer]

Tip. When bolting target plates together. You should try schedule 8 bolts. They won’t stretch nearly as much, if any.

[@bradburnett7576]

fps is an ok measurement to use but I think you want to measure the joules instead.

[@glockparaastra]

Great videos but you guys have gotta be more careful. I have a hole in my arm (stitched up and healed since) from shooting steel with a 30-06.

[@UnknowableAbsolute]

SLAP-T is absolute monster, awesome video, M2 is really beast, this is dream weapon to have, what price on this M2HB?

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for the comment. That set up is about 12 grand

[@The9Pauls]

Epic. You guys should brace those shield panels a little better to protect the shooter

[@scottodonahoe9505]

Any gap would slow down any round . Put a vacuum space of even a 1/4 inch and it would be a total win for not killing the target !A vacuum sucks !

[@GoingBallistic]

👍👍

[@robertd7226]

Could 50 caliber slap be used by Ukraine to stop Russia tanks? Seems like it goes through two inches

[@GoingBallistic]

It would go through some parts of the tank, but not others.

[@fomomofo6917]

Be careful with those slap rounds. A bad one almost killed Kentucky Ballistics.

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks 👍

[@codethinki]

i‘seen some videos of this channel and i love them. The only problem is that u speak very much and kinda slow so it takes like ages between the shots. Again i love ur videos and do not change anything if it’s only me with this problem cause then it is mine not urs😂.

[@GoingBallistic]

Hey thanks for being honest, and not a A-hole about it.

[@lukebater5636]

Two plates is stronger because - The molecules in one thick 2 inch plate would all be affected and start to move as the bullet impacts as they are all kind of joined - whereas 2 plates bolted together the 2nd plates molecules remain mainly unstretched until the bullet actually hits the second plate. That is my estimate why.

[@dwwolf4636]

Its not. Shockwave reflections and no support ( and support as in its one piece of material) for the backface zone means that little bit actually has lower resistance. The same thing happens near the edges of armor plates.

[@1shagg420]

Wow this is totally unbelievable! Those slap rounds have changed artillery forever.

[@Conan-ny1um]

A tip for next time use grade 8’bolts they will not stretch! As always awesome video guys!

[@GoingBallistic]

Yep

[@JohnD-JohnD]

Would be interesting to see different materials mixed in.. Layers of Titanium with layers of maybe Kevlar or a gel between them

[@GoingBallistic]

Good idea

[@qazzaq3354]

Классная у вас работа друзья!!! Жаль у нас в стране нельзя такими делами заниматься. 👍👍👍

[@duramax78]

This test is not fair, shoulda used new bolts, the plates separating makes a big difference.

[@GoingBallistic]

Yep

[@bigdaddyhall7196]

I would show the bullets up close more and tell what's different from a normal round. Great content just delivery is bland and it's like you're just talking to us and showing a big bang.

[@АлексейКорзников-щ6э]

Привет из России! К вам пришёл по рекомендации Zёбра (kzbin.info/door/32velEjgFxI08yXZOD22dg)

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for stopping by

[@izzuddinzaheid6147]

Suggestion: tilt the plate 30° to emulate the t-34 slope

[@timfisher77]

not actually stronger, just more difficult to penetrate

[@KailuaDoug]

How about taking some 4"x4"x8' wooden beams and shooting the various 50 CAL rounds into it lengthwise to see how far up that 8-foot beam they'll travel. You'd have to strap them down of course, and be precise with your angles (to best keep the bullet from exiting out one of the sides after a foot or so). But that would show the penetration differences in these various rounds. Especially those slap rounds that seem to blow through everything.

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for the idea👍

[@KailuaDoug]

@@GoingBallistic - They are about $15 each (for 8', $10 for 6'). I suggest buying 9 of them. Stack them 3 wide by 3 high. Strap them together on both ends and shoot for the center beam. That way if the bullet's trajectory through the wood isn't straight. it'll still be in the stack. Anyway, just my thought on building something kinda inexpensive that may actually stop those slap rounds so we can see how deep they'll penetrate.

[@asheshinfinite3766]

These .50 BMG SLAP rounds are badass! Awesome video, once again, guys!😁

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks 👍

[@DD08DK]

Hello gentlemen. Fantastic video once again. Thanks! Whether you should use one or 2 plates really depends on a multitude of factors. The only thing the AP rounds may have benefitted from, was the stripping/elongation/deformation of the nuts and bolts, effectively leaving the plates more distance to stop the penetrator. Heck... the large deformation, and hardly any deformation of the projectile, is likely the reason for the "throw-back", as the elastic deformation returns to whatever plastic deformation that has been done. I wish you had an ultra high speed camera for a comparative test! I reckon the primary reason for having stacked armor, is for the first plate to deform/break/deflect the projectile, and let the following plates stop it/the fragments. Given that the projectiles look more or less intact, i would rather have a solid plate, than 2 or more thinner plates of titanium. There is also a fairly large gap between the plates for the last SLAP round. Anyways... Tungsten penetrators at high velocity is not easy to "catch"... if you wish to be alive afterwards. Cheers...

[@xXB.FunkXx]

You guy are awesome! Thanks for the bad @$$ videos.

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for watching!

[@brett567]

Getting as bad as Edwin with all these ricochets 😂 least you guys use a shield. Did it do much damage to the truck or just bounce off. Also spare 50 barrel? How bout working some machining magic to make if fit the squeeze bores still itching to see how they perform.

[@jamesd4923]

Great idea little bit of machine work should be no problem. you're right about Edwin common sense sometimes evades him.

[@GoingBallistic]

Lol, I know. That’s why we use shields Some day, we’re trying to figure that out for the squeeze bore round

[@luckeypolishing]

I think a sold plate is stronger. One solid piece metal is denser... like a plate of tungsten or multiple plates of tungsten will shatter when hit; if it’s a solid 4” cube a 50bmg will only make a .5” crater.

[@thorwaldjohanson2526]

Awesome video. A bit of constructive criticism / feedback: Please include more details in the video / description, such as bullet stats (load, weight, type of core (thungsten, steel), the muzzle velocity (one was out of frame). That would be awesome :)

[@РоманПелевин-ж4с]

Давно смотрю Вас. Ещё со времен Зебры)))). Процветания вашему каналу!

[@GoingBallistic]

Thanks for your support.

[@GUNTHER1]

THAT WAS PURE AWESOMENESS! THANKS KRIS AND JUSTIN ,THAT MADE UP FOR A REALLY SHITTY WEEK FOR ME , YOU GUYS ARE THE KINGS OF THE 50 BMG ROUNDS AND ALL KINDS OF AWESOME ROUNDS, KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK FELLAS, STAY STRONG!!! 👍👍💪🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

[@GoingBallistic]

Thank you. I hope next week is much better for you my friend.

[@jackjasper5437]

Might be way too much to ask for but I would love to see two and a quarter inch of titanium versus slap rounds I know titanium and slap rounds are pretty expensive

[@GoingBallistic]

Some day

[@jackjasper5437]

Ok

[@PBK79]

SPR 2 Pindad test..👍

[@1776FREE2]

6:16 Definitely *DON’T* show us what it did to the car that it hit.

[@1776FREE2]

Hey also please show each (type of) round up close before each shot!!! This will add ‘production quality’ for your viewers. Thank you! Love the channel!

[@TheMrPeteChannel]

Great video! Once again requesting to shoot the older titanium pieces at a 45 degree angle!

[@manithraizo]

It's too dangerous to shoot regular slap round

[@SoCalPatriot81]

for the algorithm.

[@АлександрЕрмаков-Блаженный]

Противопульная броня двойная делается наружняя максимальной твёрдости,т.п.(быстрорежущая сталь воснавномР9или Р9М термообработаные(закаленые и т.д.))чтобы пуля затупилась прикрученая к внутренней обычной марганцевой(стальГадфильда внутренняя).Между слоями брони могут находится противокумулятивные блоки теплоизаляционные с добавкой асбеста из КЛ-1.1-1.3,илиДЛ-1.2 и огнеупорные шамотные с асбестом но для защиты наружной противокумулятивных блоков применяется вновь сталь марганцевая,пишу тебе потомучто патроны с красной пулей в свободной продаже непродаются они армейские(убийца бронежилетов) но вообщето они слабее мною разработаных т.е.корпус пули изготовлен из мягкой стали для гвоздей или титана,сзади в корпусе просверлено отверстие вперёд ненасквозь на 5-20мм. диаметром1/2диаметра пули,в отверстие впрессован мягкой впрессовкой(+0.02-0.06мм.)сверхпрочный сердечник острый спереди и сзади и с небольшим(0.1мм.спереди и0.2-0.5мм.на выходе из пули т.е.впрессовка на горячую(корпус нагревается,вставляется сердечник,охлаждается,пуля центрируется и подгоняется под калибр обтачиванием корпуса)конусным утоньшением сердцевины к заду на всю длинну сердцевины сзади чтобы войти в порох при изготовление патрона длинной150-200%длинны пули(сердечник торчит сзади),пуля ударяясь в цель мягким металлом расплющиваясь разбивает керамику и сердечник пробивает всё но против сталиР9незнаю,пишу тебе т.к.писалМэтту но он использует только продающиеся в магазине патроны т.п.о снарядах стенобитных т.е.с кумулятивным детонатором между детонатора головкой кумулятивной и пробкой вварачивающейся в корпус детонатора деревянная палка или трубка тонкостенная металлическая с отверстиями и дополнительной взрывчаткой внутри вварачивающимся сзади или спереди(чтобы убить наступающего противника в спину выстрелив за противника) и до переда или зада корпуса внутри и при детонации кумулятивная струя ударяет в корпус и брызгами детонирует заряд и прожигает корпус передний или задний и вся взрывная волна бъёт вперёд(снаряд направленой взрывной волны)дробя всё впереди снаряда взрывной волной,при попадание в танк взрывает динамическую защиту в радиусе1-1.5метра,разбивает внутри всю электронику и глушит экипаж и возможная детонация боекомплекта,защита-кевларовые прокладки между слоями брони,я его расщитал но проверить немогу поэтому пишу тебе учитывая патрон с красной пулей.

[@GoingBallistic]

That sounds like an amazing round. (if google translated it correctly) Justin would love to try one. Send some pictures to [e-mail]

[@АлександрЕрмаков-Блаженный]

@@GoingBallistic Прочитал ваше сообщение но я неизготавливаю такие вещи т.к.я их изобретаю на продажу в виде чертежей т.е.я против изготовления такого в моей стране но учитывая моё нищенское финансовое положение я думаю к концу месяца это у меня пройдёт(сказали я больной и старый,решаю дать добро на изготовление здесь особенно взрывчатых веществ боевых типа:Гексоген(плавкий гексоген-сплав гексогена с глицерином=температура плавления около+80-100С.°,плотность1.816) и в время детонации гексоген нитрирует глицерин,глицеринтринитрат мощнее гексогена на поатомном уровне(но сохранение вакуума в жидкости на время детонации жидкости невозможно поэтому полная детонация жидкости невозможная)поэтому вернуть неможет и возникает необратимая потеря т.е.вакуум(т.е.рыба) и противодействие вакууму т.е.сверхсжатие=детонация глицеринтринитрата от сжатия и значит гексогена от удара мощнейшей взрывчатки и передсобой гонит глицеринтринитрат тратя его силу на уничьтожение воды сопротивляющейся взрыву до сращивания с пространством(типа так и было)) и мощнее(я нищий что можетбыть хуже),для изготовления гексогена разработал метод К модернизированый т.е.с добавлением в азотную кислоту нитрата аммония реагирующего с формальдегидом добавленого уротропина при добавление NO2 с восстановлением нитрата аммония и азотистую кислоту из NH4O2Н(при нитрирование атом азотной кислоты выделяяNO2 разлогает нитрат аммония с выделением из егоNO2,назад с дополнительным NO2 восстанавливается нитрат аммония и азотистая кислота для восстановления нитрата аммония но если в смесе азотная кислота кончилась нитрирование непродолжается)и уротропина разрушеного тем и преобразование его в гексоген(нитрирование через нитрат аммония и азотной кислотой с восстановлением нитрата аммония и азотистой кислоты для нитрирования дальнейшего(бесприрывное нитрирование уротропина),в завершение с оставшейся смеси вынимается гексоген(выход до98% из ращётных100%) в оставшуюся смесь нитрата аммония и азотистой кислоты с водой добавляется аммиак для полного уничьтожения отходов в смесь нитрата и нитрита аммония с небольшим количеством гексогена вместо глицерина пригодная в виде взрывчатки в горнодобыче)хотя если осторожно(медленно с быстрым перемешиванием, добавлять аммиак его можно добавить недоставая гесоген из смеси получится больше гексогена,после гексоген вынимается,и всё сушится,глицерин добавляется желательно перед доставанием гексогена из раствора т.к.глицерин препядствует самодетонацие но глицерин в кислоту нельзя т.к.сразу выделяет акролеин сигнализируя о кислоте)и тогда видно будет,ваш [e-mail]“ я записал,мне выгоднее писать коментарии потому-что в gmail мною написаное видят мало людей,качество свиннины пахнет фикалиями,жир воснавном состоит из солидола а казалось дерьмо по рекам,т.п.ушло заграницу но казалось уже25лет(год на торможение и охлаждениеТВЭЛ-ов и...,с жопы в рот,нерекомендую т.к.здесь смерть очистных сооружений(поздно пить боржоми если почки отвалились)),рыба здесь особенно дикая чистейшая но очень мало т.к.на всё запрет а при запрете рыболовство умом неблещет(рыбаков здесь вообщемто(пофакту) нет есть какието так для зачёта(ради какойто отмазки)из корыстьных побуждений что-то скрывающие),я учился на слесарь-ремонтник но время и мне стать вигитерьянцем.Я русский и 7лет назад я изобрёл лекарство против Covid19(против с жопы в рот т.к.здесь он известен давно)и меня непустили в Россию т.к.гражданин Р.Б.(здешнее гражданство хуже чёрной метки).Нитрит аммония:Размягчитель взрывчатого веществп т.е.в взрывчатом веществе неразлогается а понижает температуру его плавления~в до2раза и в детонацие дозаряжает взрывчатку оксидом азота,всегда присутствует в нитрате аммония и можетбыть выявлен плавлением нитрата аммония с глицерином т.к.без нитрита аммония нитрат аммония несуществует.Тринитрофенол боевой-тринтрофенол(можно влажный,в воде чтобы несплавился в кусок) протравливается сероводородом(2C6H2(NO2)3OH+H2S=S(C6H2(NO2)3)2(Тринитрофенол боевой)+2Н2О,сушится,или фенол+азотная кислота+сероводород(2C6H5OH+6HNO3=2C6H2(NO3)OH+6H2O,+H2S=S(C6H2(NO2)3)2+8H2O,сушится),тринитрофенол боевой неделает пикраты т.к.его пикратная часть(т.к.ОН)заменена серой,так получается чистый боевой тринитрофенол т.к.в изготовление неполучаются динитро и нитрофенол,боевой тринитрофенол обратим в тринитрофенол обычный необходимый для детонации боевого тринитрофенола добавлениемН2О2 с образованием оксида серыSO2(S(C6H2(NO2)3)+3H2O2=2C6H2(NO2)3ОН+SO2+2Н2О,сушится(сернистая кислота несуществует есть растворSO2 в воде разлогающийся при высыхание наSO2 и Н2О(такой раствор называющийся сернистая кислота(SO2)используется при нитрирование если необходима серная кислота и из азотной и её(SO2) в нитрование получается серная(2HNO3+SO2=2NO2+H2SO4)после нитрования разлогаемая сероводородом(3H2S+H2SO4=4S+4H2O для чистоты пронитрированого(тринитротолуола,т.п.,C3H4O+2HNO3+SO2=C3(NO2)2+H2SO4,+3H2S=C3(NO2S2)2(динитросероуглерод,2C3H4O+6НNO3+SO2+4H2S=C2S(NO2)6(CS2)2(дитринитросероуглерод)+6H2O,сушится,реакция детонации:C(NO2)2+2CS2(также можетбыть изготовлен:4СН(NO2)2+8CS2+O2воздуха(через раствор пропускается воздух)=4С3(NO2S2)2+2H2O,сушится или CO(ацетон)+2CS2+2NO2+2H2O,сушится))!Эпидермис восстанавливается ловлей рыбы в реках и проточных озёрах(речных заводях,водохранилищах)и выпусканием её в бессточные(ое)озёра(ро)В азотной кислоте без разложения может хранится50%азотистой кислоты или(HNO3 2+H2O 1-HNO3 86%)1.55веса+(NO2 2моль)1веса(O(HNO3HNO2)2-азотная кислота для нитрирования,нелепит комки,нитрирование с добавлением ацетона для охлаждения и(или)пропусканием воздуха)!До встреч!

[@shawncallaway7294]

Binging this channel

[@jayc2469]

I was starting to think to myself up until the last, that if only they were travelling at the 4000fps, they All might have gone through!

[@robertbekkers4974]

two plates will bend a little more than one single plate and therefor absorb more energy -hence stronger

[@Frozen5Flames]

Hello from Russian KZbin зёбра

[@Jetscrolls]

Ты слишком рано. Зёбра еще не отправлял свою армию на это видео))

[@Frozen5Flames]

@@Jetscrolls я знаю

[@wultna]

Before watching this video I bet every rounds designated for AP (Black, Silver, SLAP, Raufoss) will go through since titanium is not as far as strong as AR500 steel.

[@skaterxd]

In the scale of thing take a second step back and realize how primitive we still actually are. We are still throwing things at each other.. really freaking hard but still. Seems super primitive and life will continue after were gone and advance.

[@mrslipknotfan1000]

They really should angle those plates up wards so it doesn't fly back at them

[@GoingBallistic]

We shot them straight up to get the correct test of the rounds. We do angle plates for other test videos, but we wanted to try it straight on this and a few others.

[@mrslipknotfan1000]

@@GoingBallistic I understand for most accurate tests but still get behind something other than plexiglass then! Lol I've seen 2 videos on KZbin alone of a .50 round coming back and one destroyed the headphones the shooter was wearing and the other whizzed by his head as well. Great vids though. 👌

[@dimmacommunication]

Automatic thumbs up :)

[@GoingBallistic]

Right on!

[@bmbunch8825]

Now do carbide!

[@Nicknamessuk]

If you angle the plates it will deflect the bullet in a safe direction instead of back at you. What you are doing is very dangerous . Those shields may not stop it.

[@DeepSouthern_Outdoors]

What alloy of titanium? Pure titanium is relatively weak and the alloys are much stronger. Probably most popular strong alloy is 6AL-4V

[@quakerridge2212]

Nice job guys