2021 Honda Accord Hybrid

[@jeffarnholt1310]

I own the 2019 Accord Hybrid EX-L. I agree with Alex on all points--this is a very accurate review. The 17" wheels have a noticeably softer ride AND more fuel efficient; many Accord Hybrid owners in the forums have noticed this as well, and the 17" wheels are generally preferred. I get 49 MPG on flat highways at 65 MPH. Shorter in town trips are noticeably worse--mid 30's in the winter--but the serial hybrid driving dynamics are fantastic, with very linear EV-ish and smoother acceleration than the competition. It is a trade-off I'm more than happy to make, as this car drives better than the competition. Good job, Alex!

[@normt430]

The key to Honda hybrids is speed limit driving. Even Alex had mentioned that before.

[@flamingwonky]

Agree. I own a 2018 Hybrid EX-L and the 17" wheels get pretty good mileage, best when driving in the city and on country roads about 60 MPH, in which case you can get 50MPG. Any situation when the demand is increased has a relatively bigger impact on mileage compared to other hybrids because it keeps the engine on more frequently - this includes higher speeds, winter conditions, and increased rolling resistance and wind resistance. The Touring grade got the big 19" wheels for 21M likely for marketability purposes, and this is a big hit to mileage. I myself fitted aftermarket 19" wheels with 245 width tires to my Accord and it has a drastic MPG impact of about -5 MPG compared to the 17", but I wanted the increased grip levels. I think the Accord Hybrid is an excellent car, but don't get the 19" wheels if you value fuel economy.

[@sly9263]

Goes without saying, but the stock tires are absolutely terrible on even the smallest amounts of snow. I always wind up getting a set of snows for all my vehicles anyway, but I was surprised at how bad the all season/hybrid low rolling resistance tires were in cold weather with 1-2 inches of snow on the road.

[@LoganMaclaren]

When I'm looking for an in-depth review, you never let me down, Alex. It's the best in the business. :-)

[@DavidMatthews84]

I recently bought the 2021 version of this car. Coming from owning a Mercedes Benz C class (c450) and E class (E300) for my last two cars, this design has become a breath of fresh air for me. For someone never owning a hybrid before, I’m super impressed. I’m more excited about this car than I was stepping into the ones mentioned above. I believe Hondas decision with putting on 19inch rims was smart (marketing wise). I feel like they wanted to appeal to a more sporty based driver that likes the look of a more sporty car, but also wishes he didn’t have to spend so much money at the tank for that look. The rims alone on this 2021 Hybrid is what drew me to this Honda. Anything smaller and less appealing most likely would have had me back leasing another Mercedes or for this time around another Audi... ultimately missing out on owning a car that I could eventually have no payments on and that will drive for decades to come (something you just can’t get with high end luxury cars). This design is everything to me. I hated the rear tail lights, but have now come to like them (not love). As someone who was never overly concerned with gas when buying a vehicle... getting anything above 20mpg in the city for me has been a amazing. For anyone thinking of moving from a higher end luxury/sportier car to this, I would say without any hesitation... it’s not a step down but a step up! Better insurance costs... better fuel costs... and your excise tax bill will no longer stab you in the heart when it comes. A proud Honda owner here! No more leasing and driving around in cars that depreciate, cost so much to own and maintain, and in the end must be returned because the only way they were affordable (for some) was by leasing them. This car is a major go!

[@yahtadi5152]

Bruh, I really need the confirmation I have tried EV before and I gotta say. I simple dont like one pedal operation, it just not me This Honda Hybrid system, from what im getting: 1. Ev only 2. Engine fed electric motor 3. Engine drive the wheel when clutch is closed What I need to know, from point 1 - 3.. There is no point when this system feels like CVT/Automatic Tranny yeah? All point will feel like one pedal operation yes?

[@DavidMatthews84]

@@davidjones3520 I did get the maintenance rolled into the lease both times. However, when I had a flat tire or anything outside of that maintenance package it was ridiculously expensive. Hopefully this doesn’t come off as bragging, but a good friend of the family works for Honda and I get all the maintenance done through him. If he didn’t work for them, I’m sure I would still be smiling at how much lower the cost would be. I’m still in love with this car 14 months later. Especially with the rising gas prices. Such a smarter buy. If in time finances get better I’ll be looking for an all electric car, preferably a luxury-super-fast one :)

[@Bheji07]

What are you paying for it monthly?

[@DavidMatthews84]

@@Bheji07 $450mo

[@Bheji07]

@@DavidMatthews84 I am actually going to check some numbers on 2022 version of this one. For lease I wanted to be around 450 too. Any advice you got for me?

[@scottstewart5784]

OH! You're saying "touring" - I wondered what the two ring thing was.

[@FoolishImp]

He sounds like a South Park character when he says it.

[@JCWiley2300]

lol i literally just commented the same thing before i saw yours!

[@naveenthemachine]

@@KarlLetcher some say yes but some say Toyota can’t compete w Honda which I think is just extreme

[@thatpersonsmusic]

It’s just half an audi

[@rightlanehog3151]

@@thatpersonsmusic Exactly what I was thinking but did not dare say.

[@BryanW916]

I’ve heard those touring rims/tires have a huge impact on the MPG. The lower trims with the smaller and more narrow rims/tires are much more efficient.

[@tmoss1994]

Yes, I agree. I have a 2019 EX and I get 46 mpg.

[@nobreyner60]

I have a '19 touring hybrid and I'm getting 47.3 mpg according to Fuelly. The rims and tires have everything to do with mpg here

[@rkalla]

2-3mpg

[@bikingmoments]

I swapped them out because those tires are terrible at grip level and wet traction! A few mpg loss is worth the handling improvement

[@bruddahmanmatt]

That’s exactly what it is. Tourings with the 19s are rated at 44/41/43 city/highway/combined vs 48/48/48 for the lower trims which all ride on 17s. You pay a big mileage penalty to ride on 19s. The 18-20 Tourings also got 48 MPG across the board because they used to roll on 17s.

[@ljpr360]

It's those silly 19inch Rims. What idiot in product planning said: "Let's put our least efficient rims that fit on the Accord on the hybrid, we were already losing to the Camry Hybrid on paper!" They should have kept the aerodynamic small rims. Of course maybe that wasn't such a bad choice since so many people only buy sedans for looks these days.

[@Beafybrian]

Agreeed, the stylings are the main factors. Slap a battery on It and boom you get the best of both worlds

[@joa8593]

Engineer: "Smaller wheels will give better fuel economy, a better ride, less road noise, and better hydroplane resistance" Marketing: "Car magazines like big wheels" Executives: "Ok, I'm convinced. Let's go with the big wheels"

[@hungson215]

If you want the most efficient car, get a prius. If you want a fun car to drive and save gas at the same time, this is the car.

[@dudley7540]

Yeah but think of how more money you can spend on the bigger tires!

[@rkgsd]

19" wheels means you only have room for thin tires in the wheel well. Same delima you have with the Camry XSE and the Teslas.

[@rightlanehog3151]

Alex, To put the 'real world' fuel economy in a proper perspective, you got better mpg with the AWD Highlander Hybrid. #SaveSideWall #savethemanuals

[@LlyleHunter]

Exactly!

[@normt430]

See SavageGeese review. They were pretty brutal! But to compare on fuelly the Camry is within a mpg or two, while HiHY is at 30 mpg. Meanwhile a Pacifica Hybrid S is doubling Toyota hybrid suvs and minivan. www.fuelly.com/car/chrysler/pacifica/2017/robbw/616831

[@Pikminiman]

I understand that it's for weight savings and efficiency, but I will always be disappointed when a car company deletes the spare tire. Credit where it's due, though: I appreciate the continuing presence of the spare tire well.

[@Al13n1nV8D3R]

The way things are going. They would be getting rid of rear seats and moon roofs too!

[@ahwhite2022]

As long as you can still mount a spare, it doesn't really bother me. I just wish Honda weren't so stupid about the parts for the spare. You almost have to argue with the parts people to get the ordered.

[@errcoche]

I ordered a donut tire for my wife's Bolt. She doesn't need to be trying to fix a flat by the side of the road. Hopefully she will never use it. I am not a fan of filling a tire with synthetic booger as a means of repair.

[@Tigerex966]

no its not for either of those, it's for $$$, in almost all cases. to save on production, thats at least $200 off of production. The 30 pounds is not going to make a difference in the mpg. Then they will gladly sell you the spare tire kit for $500, yea what used to be free. Having said that you may never use your spare, but I consider that one of the biggest safety features of any car, along with brakes. If you only use it once in your life, it has paid for itself, and may save your life. But what do I know, I still like analogue gauges, volume/tune knobs, ac buttons, aux input, and sdcards on phones. even my laptop, has upgradeable memory and ssds, and I drive a manual. I guess I am a relic of the past, I even enjoy live music, and homecooked meals from scratch.

[@Al13n1nV8D3R]

@@Tigerex966 You forgot " a girlfriend/wife that is natural beauty not the one with a boob and butt job. I am only 30 years old and i am just like you prefer Analog over Digital, real over fake, old school over new school.

[@nfugitt89]

They should have the 17s on all hybrids. Nobody is going to the Touring trim for the wheels

[@mdw1000]

We own a 19 Accord Touring hybrid. The reviewers that don’t like how it sounds don’t understand how it is working. As your earlier video basically explained, when it is accelerating it is basically an electric car (whose electricity is being generated by the onboard gas engine/generator combo). I think it is a clever system and enjoy driving it. We have a manual NC Miata when we want are more traditional driving experience 😊

[@CC-gw4bj]

I just bought a 2018 Accord Touring hybrid (which are out there, just coming off leases, mine had 29,000 miles), which has only been tweaked slightly for 2021. I have only put a couple hundred miles on it so far, but am easily getting 41mpg combined in San Diego, which has been cool and rainy lately. Milage aside, what Alex says about it driving and having starting torque like an electric is true, it is so smooth and quiet and powerful. In Eco and regular mode, can barely hear when the engine does kick on, only in sport does it rev (nicely, I would say). Hit sport to merge onto the freeway, and you get a sudden super-charge, then back to eco and near-silent cruising. I'll take a knock on the mileage for the luxury, the way it drives and feels, and the fact that I bought it used balances my environmental impact. I expect to keep this car until I join the full electric world, once the infrastructure and battery issues are ironed out.

[@Jie1478]

I have the 2020 Acoord Hybrid Touring. The fuel economy is no where near the 47 advertised. Try 37mpg. I am in Bakersfield CA.

[@sly9263]

The only reason you're not getting near the advertised mpg is either very short trips or you're driving too fast- this is a driver behavior issue, not a problem with the vehicle. Most likely you've got a heavy foot and aren't looking for the sweet spot in the rpm band and driving in the right lane on the highway. It's not just a hybrid thing either- with all cars you see people claim that the average MPG is false when its very plainly their own driving habits that bring their numbers down. Yes, my F150 is capable of getting 18 city and 21 highway but the way I personally drive it, I get 15.5. That doesn't mean Ford is lying, because I can in fact hit those numbers if I am very gentle and conscientious with it... I just don't care enough about the difference.

[@MrRiico]

My ‘18 Hybrid Touring produced similar mpgs until I learned how to drive it. It has averaged 46 mpg over its lifetime, but in the city it averages over 50. I’m sure yours will too once you’ve learned it’s sweet spots.

[@patone2184]

It depends how fast you go

[@Sarcasticone1]

34 MPG is terrible for a hybrid, no matter what speed your driving.

[@normt430]

2020 Highlander Hybrid hides it's 30 mpg average on fuelly!

[@drewbenefield2001]

I see other KZbinrs reviewing this car and it’s getting 42- 48

[@naveenthemachine]

I get 29mpg in my v6 Camry and on the highway I can get 35-40mpg which is up there w the hybrids (except the Prius)

[@mavsguy842]

I wish they would take the Clarity's PHEV system and just make an Accord PHEV. Even if EV range was down from the Clarity, the better rear end styling, additional luxury features (e.g. HUD, heated steering wheel) and updated infotainment would be a good trade-off for that reduction in range.

[@marcelstanford430]

The Clarity sells so few units I think you're right, add the PHEV to Accord and kill Clarity, and I'm a Clarity owner. Might make it too expensive though. Word on the street is Honda loses money on every Clarity they sell. Last month (Feb.) only 420 were sold in the entire U.S..

[@zaitcev0]

There's NO good trade-off for reduction in range.

[@markmiller3279]

I doubt the Accord has room for the larger battery of the Clarity. It won't fit under the back seat, that's for sure.

[@mavsguy842]

@@markmiller3279 they would probably have to utilize the room under the load floor where the spare tire well is currently. It wouldn’t be an as-is thing.

[@chrisstoddard1144]

The Clarity was primarily designed to be hydrogen fuel cell powered and is still available that way. The Accord would probably be severely challenged to house a 17 kWh battery.

[@swanblake]

I don't understand why you gave a car that gets below its EPA rating and behind the competitors fuel economy, a "B" rating? Seems very apologetic to Honda

[@pdd3]

Still better than every other midsize sedan that's not hybrid or electric.

[@ahwhite2022]

If I had a dime for every time some guy in the internet claimed some absurd real world mpg on a car or truck, I'd... well, I'd have enough dimes to get my whole gang to Rock Ridge, and then some. That Honda hybrid engine system will deliver performance on par with sports cars 40 years ago, and fuel efficiency better than a little econo box 20 years ago. If that doesn't suit you, buy elsewhere.

[@mrsj1417]

@@toyorobo Sure you do. And it runs on pixie dust, not gas. Why do people make up stories?

[@sly9263]

Please explain why a car that gets upper 40's in mpg (49 in perfect conditions) deserves a rating below B. I was getting 50mpg in my 2017 accord hybrid with highway driving all day, excluding cold weather seasons when it dropped to upper 30s or 40. While you're at it, please be sure to list all of the cars above it that fall into the A ranking- lets see how long that list is.

[@KaizenWizard]

I definitely think the Accord is handsome, but I'm not a fan of the big chrome bar across the nose.

[@Yoiyoiiiiiiii]

They do offer a grey and black bar as well

[@markmiller3279]

Nobody is. I do wish they'd realize what a mistake they made with that corporate grille design, because that chrome beam has never looked good. The rest of the Accord is quite handsome (I don't mind the taillights), but that nose ruins an important view.

[@drewbenefield2001]

I replaced mine with black.

[@Mountain-Man-3000]

Honda has never real been "all in" on fuel economy for the Accord Hybrid. My guess is they don't want it to drive like a Prius...

[@Smileydudekxy]

Bingo !

[@pdd3]

Camry Hybrid doesn't drive like a Prius but gives Prius-like economy.

[@markmiller3279]

@@pdd3 The Camry's drivetrain is very closely related to that of the Prius and the driving experience has a lot of similarities. I suspect Honda is just trying to make a hybrid drivetrain that more easily fits into a car where it was an afterthought. The Toyota system has very different packaging requirements.

[@garrettw99]

@@pdd3 the Camry Hybrid powertrain feels very similar to the Prius. The difference is the Camry is a little more refined and quicker

[@drewbenefield2001]

Alex’s last review on this car he was getting 47 mpg!

[@brandonmartinez9259]

I don't have a Honda accord hybrid but I do have a cr-v hybrid and honestly it is a let down when it comes to cold weather. Once it gets below 45 degrees it dips down to 25-29 mpg. If it is in the 20s and doing 75 I only managed 21-23 mpg. I also have a sonata hybrid and that has been consistently 40+ mpg down to 10 degrees

[@mrTopherB13]

Thanks for that! Was looking at the CR-V Hybrid to possibly replace my RAV4

[@brandonmartinez9259]

@@mrTopherB13 no problem we thought there was something wrong with it and had honda check it out to make sure and everything checked out fine. So on a 65-70 degree day we ran it down the highway here for about 50 miles at 75-80 and it was doing 31-33mpg. I just can't figure out why it does so bad when it is cooler out compared to the sonata. I have also driven both the sonata and cr-v to Colorado and back to Arkansas and like I said at 75 the cr-v did 21mpg at the lowest and 27mpg at the highest. The sonata I ran at 77 and averaged 40-45mpg and it was roughly the same temperature on both trips

[@lighthouse7i]

In order to save weight Honda deletes the spare tire?? What a crock! Night time (or anytime) in bad weather, one of the rims is touching asphalt, and you have to call and wait on a tow truck with kids in the car. Not a wise decision for a "Family Sedan"! And that motor sounds like a Briggs & Stratton. Thanks for the review, because I am considering one of these and I'm not sure if the dealership would point out that I have to go purchase a spare tire.

[@michaelcastro5339]

Every time I see Alex on the trunk I think he is doing trunk measurements for the mafia, so they know which car can hold people the best. They might be criminals, but they want you to be "mostly" comfortable until you get to where you will be swimming with the fishes. So thoughtful.... :-D hehe

[@FourJaysFour]

🤣😂🤣🤣

[@Odinarcade00]

If you drive conservatively you will get great gas mileage and less west and tear on your car. A lot of reviews are only judging the car in sport mode not eco mode.

[@dbourke7385]

The advertised MPG is dependent on speed limits and climate where you live. In colder climates it performs very poorly. Downsizing tires to 17" will improve the gas mileage and comfort.

[@rtsuh]

Great analysis - agree with Alex here that Clarity is a compelling choice. I live in California and I received $9,800 in rebates (Federal $7,500 + California $1,500 + PG&E $800), making my out-the-door price less than the price of the base model Civic. Only caution here is small 7 gallon tank (still have ~330+ miles range) where you'll have to make frequent stops for a long~~ trip.

[@jamesmedina2062]

So how do you like the way it drives, the sound system, and the comfort? What mpg you getting? Is it fairly quiet?

[@nottom3309]

"For I did not speak of my own Accord" - John 12:49

[@LlyleHunter]

😂

[@AD-sp5cv]

But when kia and hyundai lied by 2 mpg a few years back they get sued lol. this is more than 2 mpg off the epa estimates! same with the ford cmax that was originally 47/47 mpg but is now like 41 no lawsuit there.. hmmmm

[@TheCapn23]

Those real world mpg numbers seem like a dealbreaker for people looking for a hybrid.

[@MaxBorker]

I wish Honda made a hybrid liftback. An accord hybrid with a hatch or a civic hatch hybrid would be my cup of tea

[@sushivision]

That's my thought as well. I'd break my bank to bring one home.

[@Mamo878]

They do. It's called the CR-V Hybrid. ha

[@Dave-cf4vd]

Make it a wagon, and give it some sport. You'd have the cargo space of a CUV, but it would still drive like a sedan.

[@TerrySitu]

The EX-L trim got 48/48 mpg EPA yet still closely equipped as the touring trim.

[@NBAThrowback00]

What is it missing from the touring?

[@TerrySitu]

@@NBAThrowback00 Touring will have bigger wheels, slow speed auto break when parking and adaptive suspension system. These are 3 big differences to me.

[@ZealofSparta]

@@TerrySitu The Touring trim also has cooled front seating that none of the others have which a major feature for me in the Summer. Too bad that can't be had on the EX-L.

[@CC-gw4bj]

The 2018 Touring model that I have, the differences are heated and ventilated front seats, heated rear seats, heads-up display (which is awesome), 17" wheels, and probably a couple other things. I don't think the earlier models had the bigger wheels, started with 2021.

[@Mikeom41]

I see drinks getting spilled on the shift buttons.

[@jeffmurray1681]

The Accord is not ugly, but it's far from handsome. A plasticky front end that looks unfinished and a less than attractive rear end. The profile and wheels are nice.

[@richsarchet9762]

The real competitor for the Accord Hybrid is the 1.5T Accord, which is rated for, and achieves, about the same mpg you saw in the real world from the Hybrid, with a considerable discount in upfront cost.

[@chrissimmons9969]

This is very true. I owned the 1.5 Accord for about a year and when I got to about 20,000 miles on the clock I was getting 42-44 MPG highway miles. The 19” wheels don’t make much sense on the hybrid.

[@normt430]

@@chrissimmons9969 Even the Malibu 1.5t is quicker than the Accord 1.5t in Motor Trend handling test: "The Malibu lapped our figure-eight course in 27.4 seconds averaging 0.63 g through the process and managed 0.84 g average during lateral acceleration tests" 2018 Accord 1.5t only registered a lateral grip of 0.81g versus 0.78 and a figure-eight time of 27.7 seconds at 0.61g A Malibu 1.5T can be had for US$13,000 good luck finding Japanese competition that inexpensive.

[@Joepaq]

As a reference I own a 2017 accord hybrid with 111,000 miles on it. I average 37mpg. I recently had a 2019 accord 1.5t as a rental for 3 months when my car was in the body shop. I got 30mpg over the 3 months.

[@normt430]

@@Joepaq too bad you couldn't compare a Malibu 1.5t in your daily drives. Motor Trend got 37 mpg in their highway test of a Malibu 2.0T 9-speed.

[@Joepaq]

@@normt430 I should have mentioned that I tend to drive aggressively. Also, the mpg of the hybrid increases in the warmer weather. The prefer the hybrid over the 1.5T. The hybrid is just more responsive and has more power.

[@FredWampler]

I bought the ex hybrid Jan of 2021. I generally get 48mpg.

[@bbbt8090]

Are you pumping 87? Or 91?

[@harrytej]

@@bbbt8090 no he bought an EX with 225 width tires

[@canpin]

My 2021 honda insight's hybrid 2 motor system doesnt bother me at all. The gas milaege is amazing. Power is ample for my need. Price-performance with safety tech, honda hybrids are worth it.

[@htnowpro]

I'm with you, Clarity is the one . It has the most going for it. Great review as always. Thank you. 😊

[@HarryKuloh]

Clarity is a disgusting monstrosity. You are nuts.

[@chrisstoddard1144]

With you 100%. My daughter bought an '18 three years ago and I bought a '20 last fall. I'll end up buying gas maybe once a year, outside of road trips.

[@jarheadcharlie2315]

I'm sorry, but the Accord has a front that only its designer could love. They tried to pull off making it rounded and flat at the same time... it just doesn't work.

[@markmiller3279]

Agreed. The big chrome forehead beam has shrunk maybe a little, but it is still an awkward design. The oversized grille openings below it aren't great, either, but until Honda comes up with a better corporate front end none of their cars will be truly beautiful.

[@michaelcavalier8750]

I went to a dealership to look at one. I liked the size and the looks were acceptable. I asked the salesman if they had a battery capacity warranty (i.e., not a defects warranty). He didn't know, but said that he would find out. A few days later he called to tell me that it did not. I explained my lack of trust in Honda due to my experience with the Honda Civic Hybrid (there was a class action lawsuit). If consumers told the manufacturers that they would not buy these vehicles without capacity warranties, they would have to do so or not sell any. The average manufacturer is going to have a much better idea of the expected lifespan of the battery than the average consumer.

[@mulleygraves]

The increased noise is mainly due to the 19" wheels with wider tires which also DECIMATE the ride... not the road getting worse over time. I drove a 19" and 17" back to back the other day, both properly inflated. The 19" touring was so bad I wondered how Honda ever authorized its release.

[@Andrew-zx9wx]

Came here from a KBB Accord review for a much more professional approach 👍💯

[@Ryan57Garr]

An Accord plug-in hybrid with similar numbers to the RAV4 Prime would be a real treat. I imagine it would be quicker than the 2.0T, and with decent ev range and mpg.

[@SilverScarletSpider]

The Honda Accord 2.0T has an approximately 5 second zero to sixty mph time. That is one of the fastest times in the segment compared to the Kia K5 GT, Toyota Camry TRD, and Hyundai Sonata N-Line. No hybrid in this segment comes close to hitting the 5 second zero to sixty. The Toyota RAV4 Prime is nowhere near those speeds because it needs 8 seconds to sixty. Most other hybrids in this segment from Toyota and Honda hover around a similar 8 to 9 second zero to sixty time. Watch Alex on Auto’s videos on these vehicles for proper information and correct statistics in the real world, or do a search on Google for Car and Driver reviews, instead of spreading misinformation.

[@Ryan57Garr]

@@SilverScarletSpider Speculating and hoping that Honda will make a quick plug-in hybrid Accord is misinformation how? Seems you’re the one spreading misinformation.

[@normt430]

Even the Malibu 1.5t is quicker than the Accord 1.5t in Motor Trend handling test: "The Malibu lapped our figure-eight course in 27.4 seconds averaging 0.63 g through the process and managed 0.84 g average during lateral acceleration tests" 2018 Accord 1.5t only registered a lateral grip of 0.81g versus 0.78 and a figure-eight time of 27.7 seconds at 0.61g A Malibu 1.5T can be had for US$13,000 good luck finding Japanese competition that inexpensive.

[@Ryan57Garr]

@@normt430 no one is talking about Malibus, nor the 1.5T engine. GM’s malibu can’t hold a candle to the Accord in terms of quality, resale, and safety.

[@normt430]

@@Ryan57Garr Malibu 2.0T 9-speed has higher 1/4 mile trap speed, quicker handling time, and 37 mpg highway in Motor Trend testing. Plus it costs less and won't depreciate as fast as a more expensive economy Accord.

[@Caldwell1234]

1980-1990 rear wheel skirts.Alex that’s COLD 🤣

[@daves1646]

Alex, The previous GEN of the Accord Hybrid (your 2017 Accord H review) delivered fuel eco fairly close to EPA #’s. Both use a version of the 2L Earth Dreams motor and the 181hp electric motor as drive of the 2 motor hybrid. Ideas on why they older /17 delivered real world mpg close to 50 in your testing vs the poor eco in this test? I’m shopping hybrids and a /17 is available nearby. Thanks for the review and any understanding of what’s changed to drop the actual mpg. Thanks again!

[@Jacobcrane777]

I know the Passat isn’t winning any awards for anything but the styling is one of the best in the segment exterior wise

[@vernonbennettiii3646]

Best car reviews on the internet!

[@donbetosoy]

I own the base model hybrid and easily go over 48 mpg, pretty close to 50 mpg on eco mode driving mainly highway but real heavy traffic on street driving in Los Angeles.

[@jimhendricks977]

I bought 2021 Accord Hybrid touring I get 45.5 mpg for the last 2500 miles average, love it, what other car this size interior, ride, handling, and trunk size gets this real world mpg

[@donpaulweatherpluspaul2670]

Excellent, thorough review with a good mix of subjective and objective descriptions. You're articulate, personable, and do a fine job, Alex. I lease a 2020 2.0 Touring Edition, and will consider a hybrid for my next lease. It is a bit disappointing to learn of the below-par mileage in the Honda. Sidebar: the 19" rims on my Accord may be the reason my mpg is down 1 in mixed driving compared to my previous Accord EX-L 2.0.

[@ChrisLawrenceRebel]

I own a 2018 Clarity PHEV, thanks in large part to AoA; at the time I originally was looking at a Chevy Volt and the Clarity addressed my main issues with that car, which were the difficulty of finding adaptive cruise (it was only an option on the top trim on the Volt, while it's standard even on the base Clarity) and the tight interior size. I think it's a great car but one that occupies a shrinking space in the market as pure EVs with roadtrip range have become more affordable; while those cars haul around battery you're not going to use 95% of the time, they're saving the weight of the gas engine and associated components so as batteries become cheaper the PHEV edge is diminishing. The disconnect between the engine revs and throttle in Honda's series hybrid system hasn't ever bothered me much, but it's borderline infamous on the Clarity, being referred to by owners as "the angry bees." But if you run electric 99% of the time and don't let your battery get down under 25% on longer trips you'll hardly ever hear it... which means you'll probably notice it a lot more often on the Accord since its motors are going to need the gas engine boost much more frequently.

[@kylesheppard7965]

I just purchased a 2022 Accord Hybrid Sport, my 1st non-domestic car in 30 years. My work car is a 2021 Ford Escape PHEV. I find the Honda to be far superior in MPG along with acceleration to the Ford, and you don't have to plug it in. I had a 2021 standard Accord for a long-term rental. I find this new version to be much quieter and better acceleration than the less insulated non-hybrid model. I feel this is an outstanding all-around car with great gas milage and really fun to drive. I am 6'-2" and the front and rear comfort can't be matched for this price point or many others. As comparison my other 2 cars are a 2019 Ram Limited and a 2021 Dodge Challenger RT. Both are great cars in their own respects but the Honda is my winner for best all around car

[@dstln]

Unless people have no tax liability or aren't able to find any models in the area, it's really hard to pass up the value of the Clarity. 2020's have $7500 off manufacturer-to-dealer, up to $7500 fed tax credit, and up to $5000 state rebates. 2021s have $5000 manufacturer-to-dealer along with the other deals. The cash off may depend on region/state, but if you're in the right places, it's hard to honestly find a cheaper net car.

[@chrisstoddard1144]

Beware, the manufacturer-to-dealer rebate is only available in a few states, primarily California. For most of the country it simply isn't available.

[@Mountain-Man-3000]

The electric motor alone in this hybrid car has more power than the Chevy I learned to drive in with a V8 in 2002. SCIENCE!!

[@normt430]

Even the Malibu 1.5t is quicker than the Accord 1.5t in Motor Trend handling test: "The Malibu lapped our figure-eight course in 27.4 seconds averaging 0.63 g through the process and managed 0.84 g average during lateral acceleration tests" 2018 Accord 1.5t only registered a lateral grip of 0.81g versus 0.78 and a figure-eight time of 27.7 seconds at 0.61g A Malibu 1.5T can be had for US$13,000 good luck finding Japanese competition that inexpensive.

[@Dranamolous]

I have one tiny problem with this review - @2:15 the Accord is presented in the graphic as being way smaller than the avalon, and significantly smaller than the Camry. The Accord is 192.2 inches long and 73.3 wide. The Avalon is 195.9 and 72.8. The Accord is actually wider and taller than the Avalon and just 3.5 inches shorter. The interior volumes are almost identical. So ok compared to the Avalon you can argue the dimensions are a bit larger and you did mention that they were close. But when compared to the Camry the accord is larger in every dimension.

[@Dranamolous]

to be clear I do not think the Accord competes with the Avalon - the avalon is obviously much more luxurious. Just sayin that they’re pretty damn close in terms of dimensions - and shouldn’t appear to be in different leagues as the graphic implies

[@danguelph2676]

Jesus, even huge monstrous Sienna 2021 8 passenger van gets 36MPG!!! This Accord is half the size and weight with tiny cabin for barely 5 medium people. Honda desperately needs to step up in Hybrid game.

[@markmiller3279]

It's definitely not tiny in there, if no competition for a Sienna. It's still one of the most spacious mid-sized sedans, with gobs of rear-sear space.

[@mrsj1417]

@@markmiller3279 You missed his point entirely.

[@normt430]

@@markmiller3279 the Pacific Hybrid gets +80 mpge!

[@Imran-Shah]

@@normt430 No, the Pacific hybrid does not get 80 mpg. The Pacific PLUG-IN gets that, and only if you go full EV. Once the juice is up, it operates as a regular hybrid and then the mpg's is much worse than the new Sienna

[@normt430]

@@Imran-Shah that was +80 mpg(e). See this PacHy and others get better than Sienna Hybrid mpg. www.fuelly.com/car/chrysler/pacifica/2020/1tpg1/990739

[@tkdman2011]

Thirsty? I’m pushing the mpg and range well over 48 mpg average and getting 600 miles on a tank everytime

[@fordhouse8b]

I don’t mind the arguably funky look of the Clarity’s rear wheel wells, they remind me a bit of Citroëns, which I have always liked.

[@sunshinecycling]

Finally someone who explains the engineering and true differences mechanically from competitors. It took me about 12 videos to find this info.

[@jeffjo8732]

Just be aware that Alex gets the details about power a little sideways. These details *affect* conventional cars, with one power plant, but without the complications of a hybrid that has two. Understanding them in detail has never been critical. Alex incorrectly applies that common misunderstanding of conventional cars' power to this one. By "power plant," I mean a device that converts stored energy into power that can be used for *everything* the car needs. The conventional car has an ICE that converts gasoline into mechanical power. The ratings you see for such cars is the how much power the ICE produces at the crankshaft; that is, before it is split between the transmission, the alternator, the fuel pump, various compressors and fans, etc. It is also before any losses in those devices, mainly the transmission. The amount of power that can be sent from the transmission to the wheels has never been available. There is no easy way to say how much, because it depends on too many other factors. But a common estimate I've seen is that it is at most 85% of the ICE's power. All hybrids have two power plants, and the electric motor is *_not_* one of them. Other hybrids combine their power in some very complicated ways, but the Accord's is simple: Its two power plants are the ICE-driven generator, and the battery. There is another device called the Power Control Unit (PCU) that mixes them. Its rated output is 212 HP of electrical power. The reason I said that the electric motor is not a power plant, is because it doesn't "produce" any power. Its job is to convert some of the power, produced by those two power plants, into mechanical power to be sent to the wheels. So it is analogous to the transmission in a conventional car in every way except the form of the power that it takes as an input. Its 181 HP rating is analogous to the power figure I said is unavailable in conventional cars. And to achieve that power output, it needs the PCU to produce 181/0.85=212 HP. My point is that 212 HP is the requirement that engineers used to design the PCU, not a limitation on what the two power plants can produce. That's why the Clarity (which has a smaller ICE, a larger battery, but the same PCU) has the exact same 212 HP rating. That's why every Honda iMMD hybrid (CR-V, Insight, Fit/Jazz) has a motor rated at 85% of the PCU's power rating. In every video where he mentions the power of an iMMD hybrid, Alex points out that the power to the wheels is different than the total combined power. What he gets "sideways," is that this is true of every other car he has ever reviewed. But these are the only ones where he has been told both numbers.

[@jasonlee5968]

The engine noise is something I got used to quickly. Most of the time when I'm not flooring the gas pedal, the car runs smooth and quiet - quieter than Toyota Hybrids. Got into a friend's NX - we did some local and highway miles only when I saw the hybrid badge did I realize it wasn't a gas model. Completely different characters of hybrid drivetrains.

[@normt430]

Passengers cannot tell when the 2.0T engine in our Cadillac CT6 2.0E plug-in.

[@paddle_shift]

If the Camry hybrid was getting almost 50 mpg on the same circuit and the Accord 34, then your B score is WAY TOO LENIENT. C- would be more like it. Also, saying the Camry gets to 60 in a "little" under 7 seconds and the Accord is a "little" over 6.5 seconds really is saying they pretty much are equal. Barametric differences between the days tested will have a lot more affect on acceleration times.

[@normt430]

Our(Edmund's)2018 Honda Accord EX-L stickered for $30,865, including destination. Over the course of a year, we added 13,302 miles to our odometer. In this condition, the Edmunds TMV Calculator valued the Accord at $23,815 based on a private-party sale. That works out to 22.8% depreciation, which is slightly worse than the fleet average of 22% average. The depreciation level is even worse when you consider that the majority of our cars pass the 20,000-mile mark. Edmund's longterm Accord

[@captured_agent5714]

Hard to believe you lost value in this market.

[@normt430]

@@captured_agent5714 that Edmund's vehicle they purchased and sold around 2018. Sedans were dieing which explain why the domestic brands stop selling them. And this was a newly redesigned Accord. Not even the Japanese can beat people into buying their sedans back then and today.

[@Phrancis5]

Between the 3 choices I'd still go for the Accord, due to better looks and overall driving characteristics - even if it isn't the most efficient. The lower trims without wide tires would certainly help the mpgs. The Clarity PHEV would be perfect if it wasn't for the looks...

[@sly9263]

Any idea why the braking on the Honda accord hybrid feels more "natural" for a hybrid compared to the braking on Toyota hybrids? I've only driven the hybrid accord, rav4, and prius, but there was a noticeable difference to me in the way the brakes feel and engage on the Toyotas (very grabby- pushing pedal and nothing, nothing, then suddenly it starts to catch) vs the Honda Accord?

[@LuckyDelux247]

From what I've heard, it has to do with other hybrids having an actual transmission in between the wheels and the electric motor. As the car downshifts, it impacts the feel/response of the brakes. Honda's system has no actual transmission involved in the regenerative braking process (or anywhere else), so the overall feel is smoother.

[@shinrips]

To me, you cannot dislike the Camry. The redone front looks sporty, like a ninja helmet.

[@mustangraf]

it makes no sense how brand new hybrids cant get 60mpg easily. my 2014 hybrid accord has gotten 51mpg the past 950 miles!

[@swagkidm10]

How reliable are those older ones?

[@henrysantos942]

Mazda 6 is hands down a better looking sedan.

[@Imran-Shah]

Mazda 6 doesn't have a hybrid, so that is no comparison.

[@ThorMaxx]

Front end styling is ok.... but i never understood the strange broken up tail lamps. Also...a solid folding rear seat is kinda silly....most competition has standard 60/40 split.

[@jeffjo8732]

Most people misunderstand what HP ratings means in a conventional car. It is usually what is called SAE Net HP. That means they take the engine out of the car, with only the devices necessary for it to run. Things like water and oil pumps. But not other devices, like alternators, power steering, and power brakes, which use some of that power. That is not the HP rating of this car, since the hybrid system can't be measured that way. Instead, the 212 HP rating means the maximum electrical power that can be produced by the engine-driven generator and the battery combined. This power is used for the same things as engine power in the conventional car. But engine power only applies at one engine speed; go faster or slower, and your power is less. There are also losses in the transmission system connecting the engine to the wheels. It is customary to estimate power at the wheels as 85% of SAE Net HP. In a 212 HP car that is - wait for it - 180.2 HP. The point is that this 212 combined HP powers, in part, a 181 HP traction motor. So it compares quite well with a 212 SAE Net HP car. AND, that 181 HP at the wheels is available at any speed (well, above about 40 mph - below that, the motor is torque-limited at 232 lb-ft.)

[@CC-gw4bj]

Error in this video: Alex mentions several times his MPG vs the EPA rating of 48 MPG, however, he is driving 2021 Touring Trim, which is EPA rated at 43 MPG combined. Therefore, his real-world test track at which he got 40 MPG was significantly closer than he states in this video. From Honda website: "48 city/48 highway/48 combined mpg rating for Hybrid, Hybrid EX and Hybrid EX-L trims. 44 city/41 highway/43 combined mpg rating for the Hybrid Touring trim. Based on 2021 EPA mileage ratings. Use for comparison purposes only. Your mileage will vary depending on how you drive and maintain your vehicle, driving conditions, battery-pack age/condition and other factors."

[@mollykrieg2510]

Thank you for this video! I enjoy all of your reviews but wanted to thank you especially for this one. I finally have an answer to the question of why my boyfriend’s Accord Hybrid has never been able to get to the EPA rated gas mileage - he’s owned the 2019 model and then swapped it for the 2021. We live in Idaho where the main highways have a speed limit of 80 mph. He contacted the dealership several times and even wrote to the corporate office of Honda that never really gave him a very good explanation.

[@webbster1014]

Yeah, cars in general are more efficient at lower speeds since it takes exponentially more energy to go faster!

[@markmiller3279]

This is true of non-hybrid cars, too. At high speeds aerodynamic resistance is the main factor in efficiency, and it increases rapidly as vehicle speed increases. A car doing eighty will always be far less efficient than one doing sixty or seventy. For most cars the greatest highway efficiency will be around fifty mph, with mileage dropping off quickly the more you exceed that by. A car at 60 or even 75 might still be close to EPA highway ratings, but at 75 or 80 they will always be way below. Idaho having lots of mountain grades doesn't help any.

[@VSV659]

I am curious to know why the fuel economy drops so much from the EX-L Hybrid version to this Touring version - wheel size alone would not - there are hundreds of vehicles that have the same fuel economy when you go up wheel sizes - does Honda program the software differently for this Touring version? It is almost like the lower versions compete directly with the Camry and Sonata hybrids while this Touring version is being marketed to compete with a more upscale segment.

[@chrisstoddard1144]

Honda might be more honest than some of the other car companies in this reporting. The Gen3 Prius lost substantial fuel mileage when equipped with the 17" wheels vs. the 15" used on the base trim lines but Toyota pretended that they had no effect.

[@paulmurray3459]

A good presentation. I would have liked to see comments on turning radius, and comparisons based on city driving not highway driving.

[@chuckwilliams6261]

hybrids are wasted on the highway. The point of a hybrid is Improved efficiency in town, stop and go, on hills.

[@shaneh4837]

Just bought a used 2021 accord ex. Three weeks in and getting 49 mpg according to the trip computer! Very happy with that!!

[@Don-yf6yo]

The best styled car in the mid-size mainstream segment is the Mazda 6 by far, despite the design being first introduced in the US for the 2014 MY. The exterior design of the current generation Accord is just awful. It is just absolutely ugly. The tail lights always remind me of crab claws. But other than the exterior styling, the Accord is a fantastic car and I give props to Honda for that. But this car is a case where I won't buy one simply because I cannot get over the styling.

[@mrsj1417]

Why would they put that stupid "character line" on the sides, and have the thick crease right above the door handles where you need to put your hand to open the door? Why not make it easier, not harder, to open the doors with gloves, larger hands, etc.

[@yashkaybee]

I was thinking the same when the texts popped up. Nothing beats a mazda.

[@Imran-Shah]

Most people do NOT know how to drive a hybrid. While a hybrid typically drives like a normal car, if you really want to get max fuel economy, you need to make sure it operates in EV mode as much as possible. When maintaining a constant city speed, leave the accelerator and slowly press it again, it will go in EV mode, things like that. In other words, you need to be ACTIVELY involved with your car, which is something most people don't do. I have a Camry hybrid and it is supposed to give me 51 mpg. After 6 months of ownership I am at 51.5 and that is after our WINTER months! On recent trips with the higher temps, I am easily scoring 60's on my commuting. BUT....I pay attention to my driving and I am mostly driving in the right lane. It is indeed true that larger rims affect mpg negatively. Mine has 16 inch and that's enough for me.

[@jeffjo8732]

Indeed, most people do not know how to drive a hybrid. Including many who think they do. Some of the most common misconceptions are: (1) They gain net charge in the battery using regenerative braking. They actually use more charge getting back to the same speed (or climbing that hill), than they recovered while braking. They gain net charge by running the engine at a higher level of power that is also more efficient. (2) EV mode saves gas. The truth is that it uses the most gas; it’s just gas that you burned earlier. The extra trips though inverters, converters, and batteries all add in extra losses. I ignore any tricks to improve mileage in my 2018 Accord Touring, and drive at the average speed of the highway, in any lane. The car is "supposed" to get 47 mpg. Over the last two years, so it is representative of all seasons, I've averaged 48.2 mpg.

[@aspecreviews]

@@jeffjo8732 at constant low cruising speeds, EV mode makes up for the horrible inefficiency of a typical gas engine at those speeds and load levels. The internal combustion engine is horribly inefficient doing 25-35 mph because it is incurring significant pumping losses when the load is light. EV mode allows the car to shut off the gas engine, and then use it later at a more efficient load level to charge the battery.

[@jeffjo8732]

@@aspecreviews The engine doesn't drive the wheels at those speeds. When it runs, it drives a generator at 34 HP and 40.6% thermal efficiency. Whatever electricity is needed to power the traction motor is sent there directly (this is called Hybrid Drive). The excess is stored in the battery. It suffers an additional 25% (or so) loss when it is eventually used in EV Drive. The point is that the energy used for EV Drive ends up being about as "horribly inefficient" as the driving the wheels directly, at low load. The savings come from the portion of the of the 34 HP that was used in Hybrid Drive. Forcing the car to use EV Drive changes the proportion of time it spends in either, for the worse.

[@aspecreviews]

@@jeffjo8732 why does the Accord Hybrid have EV mode anyway? Is it just a gimmick?

[@jeffjo8732]

@@aspecreviews Because the general public doesn't understand the concept of Conservation of Energy. It has to come from somewhere. It was an unprecedented move for them at the time. Toyota did not include the wasteful "EV mode" button in the original USA version of the Prius. They did include it in other parts of the world. And the firmware to implement it existed in all Priuses ("Prii" is not the Latin plural of "Prius"). When naive hypermilers discovered it, they invented home-brewed buttons to turn it on. So Toyota did what any unethical, market-driven corporation would do: they added it to the car sometime around 2010, and hyped it as a great mpg-saving device. So that forced other makers of hybrids to add one. Get this straight: *_all_* of the energy used to propel a (non-plug-in) hybrid comes from burning gasoline. There are four paths it can take to get to the wheels (and here, "ICE" means the internal combustion engine): Gas->ICE->Transmission->Wheels Gas->ICE->Generator->Motor->Wheels Gas->ICE->Generator->Battery->(time)->Battery->Motor->Wheels (Any above to wheels)->Regen Brakes->Battery->(time)->Battery->Motor->Wheels Every step in these paths includes some loss. The more steps in a path, the more loss. There is one efficiency factor that is missing here. An ICE is most efficient when it generates about 1/4 to 1/3 of its maximum power. This is too much for cruising, but not enough for acceleration. So, while regen braking helps a hybrid not *_waste_* energy, the main benefit of a hybrid is that it reduces the loss in the "Gas->ICE" step. After that, anything that takes the path through the battery wastes more than those that don't. Since the "EV mode" button encourages such paths, it reduces mpg.

[@Jakesmusings]

I love my Mazda 6 signature. Accord was my second choice. Mazda 6 is very nice and equipped beautifully. I would love if it were 10% bigger and had a plug-in hybrid.

[@daveincanada785]

The appeal of hybrids has come and gone. It was a novelty when the Prius was king of fuel economy but that was before Tesla. PHEV's or EV's are sought after now the same way hybrids were in 2007. I am hoping Honda steps up their game soon and realizes its 2021.

[@JamesR1986]

Not yet, there are too few non-SUV EV options on the market. Your options are basically BMW, which isn't any good, the Bolt and the Model 3 and you know, THAT.

[@slscamg]

With current battery production levels Ed actually have a much larger reduction in co2 emissions in we stopped making BEV and used that same battery capacity to product hybrids. While they aren’t sexy anymore they are a better option for current technology

[@trent7080]

@@slscamg I agree

[@carminedauria-gupta2561]

Honestly, all gas cars should have at least a mild hybrid set up.

[@mrsj1417]

@@trent7080 It's not about the MPGs in every case. It's also about getting off the oil companies' t-ts and helping the environment.

[@jamesmoore9008]

Came down to these 3 when I bought last summer. At the time the 2020 Camry interior was dated in which they fixed for 2021. The Honda mpg just doesn’t equate to the others. I ended up buying a 2020 Sonata Hybrid Blue for $3k off MSRP and 0% financing and didn’t need to buy an extended warranty cause the standard warranty is so long. My brother bought 2020 Accord Hybrid and wishes he bought the Sonata. I get around 47 mpg combined which is less than the EPA 52mpg.

[@mrsj1417]

Just hope your Sonata doesn't catch on fire like so many other Hyundais. No joke, this is something you need to be aware of and careful of.

[@jamesmoore9008]

@@mrsj1417 I’m aware that older Sonatas from 2016 both the HEV and the gas Theta II engines had problems. There are not reported problems with this gen Sonata. Recent model problems have been with the full EV Kona. I’d still buy a Sonata Hybrid over the Honda Accord and I have a Honda sitting in my driveway as well.

[@naveenthemachine]

Imo the Camry isn’t dated. I actually prefer the screen integrated into the center stack. Makes for a cleaner looking dashboard

[@hitzchicky]

I have a 2017 accord, and as far as the engine noise/throttle position thing, it's never bothered me. It tends to really only happen if I'm making it work up a hill. For fuel economy, I live in the northeastern US and while I can get an individual drive at the higher end of the EPA ratings, my general mileage for a tank of gas ranges between 41 mpg in the summer and about 34 mpg in the winter. With that said, I love this car. When my lease ran up last fall I really looked for a new car, but I couldn't find anything that newer cars could give me that my current car didn't. So ultimately, I bought it. My only real complaint would be the tires. The stock tires they put on them are garbage and were practically bald by 30k miles. Highly recommend just getting a better set of tires when you get the car and sell off the stock ones.

[@ronaldk.wileyjr.5476]

I'm surprised Honda didn't have a 2 stage transmission. With one stage for the higher speed fuel efficiency. Seems like the only demerit.

[@alanhorn8253]

As cars have become the new lunch counter for a lot of people, how long can the Accord stay in EV mode idling with heat or A/C on? Are CRV & Camry similar? Would love to see this in future hev/phev reviews

[@dretech]

I certainly think the front end of the accord looks better than the rear end. I also agree about the Clarity, it's ugly but it's cheaper, it's really a pity.

[@dav3917]

Great review and very complete. Alex many people say the accord is too low to the ground did you find it easy entering and exiting the accord? And how does the regenative braking feel in stop and go traffic? Thanks

[@nostradamus7648]

The all new Toyota Crown addresses that low entry height by being 4” higher. Watch the reviews

[@dav3917]

@@nostradamus7648 thanks for the info I'll definitely watch thx

[@stephanlevesque7632]

Better package options with the Camry and better MPG. Honda has always been a day late/dollar short with their hybrid tech compared to Toyota

[@rightlanehog3151]

C'est vrai.

[@ritardstrength5169]

15:05 “69 and a half decibels” Nice

[@normt430]

Who ever said Honda's are quiet?

[@mohamedmorsy9691]

It is a bit of an overlook to skip over the Mazda 6 when talking about mid size sedans , by far looks wise the mazda is more handsome and also better interior quality

[@normt430]

Even the Malibu 1.5t is quicker than the Accord 1.5t in Motor Trend handling test: "The Malibu lapped our figure-eight course in 27.4 seconds averaging 0.63 g through the process and managed 0.84 g average during lateral acceleration tests" 2018 Accord 1.5t only registered a lateral grip of 0.81g versus 0.78 and a figure-eight time of 27.7 seconds at 0.61g A Malibu 1.5T can be had for US$13,000 good luck finding Japanese competition that inexpensive.

[@thdjjfsfh]

I drive a lot so fuel economy is important for me. When I test drive some hybrid years ago, the Accord wins hands down. Fuel economy of a Prius with almost no compromise. I am slightly disappointed that it hasn't changed much since. I still regularly beat the EPA rating in the summer if I do the speed limit.

[@SuperBooboo02]

the altima looks like a plasticky box, this is a sleek very elegant sedan

[@SIIKAP1]

I rarely drive over 70 mph so I really don’t care if it’s worse mpg than camry at high speeds

[@verynick]

Same. I actually get around 50 mpg in heavy stop and go traffic lol

[@67daltonknox]

Honda has never made an economical hybrid.

[@tpf4292]

the real world performance like MPG and acceleration is quite helpful, thank you!

[@LoganMaclaren]

You did forget the K5, which is pretty handsome as well. ;-)

[@ragweedmakesmesneeze]

No Hybrid option with the K5 as far as I know in the U.S.. For that you'd have to find previous gen Optima's on the dealer lot.

[@markmiller3279]

@@ragweedmakesmesneeze Strange, but true. So far just the Sonata gets the hybrid drivetrain. Not sure of the logic, but lately Kia and Hyundai do seem to be reducing the overlap in their models.

[@LoganMaclaren]

@@ragweedmakesmesneeze, that's true, but I was only commenting on Alex comment about the looks of the car. But you're totally right on your point.

[@Ahmedpakido]

Camery definitely gives more mpg but i still got accord hybird because of its style amd the space inside the car. In the accord you have so much room but in camry its feel like you're sitting in tight space which doesn't feel good.

[@whiteandnerdytuba]

Save weight is not an excuse for removing a 10 pound donut. Just cutting cost

[@danielwhaley2952]

UMMM K5 is the most attractive Mr. Alex on Autos

[@HarryKuloh]

Incorrect. Accord with factory sport wheels is superior

[@Aschoolbusandsimulatorfan2219]

As a Honda fan: I'd buy this car soon Alex.

[@danielwhaley2952]

Honda Wheels are not AERO which is what you need for Hybrid or PHEV

[@markmiller3279]

That, plus much wider, higher-pressure tires also increases rolling resistance and reduces gas mileage. People probably give up 5 mpg to get wheels and tires that look more attractive and handle like other cars.

[@ItsFelipeA]

I have a 2018 2.0T with a 6M and its the most amazing car that I have ever had. It has so much power and you can do burnouts without even trying with how much power it has.

[@joa8593]

I think the rear of the Camry is more attractive. The Altima has an ok front and rear so maybe on the whole the most attractive. The Sonata is a monstrosity in daylight, it looks great at night.

[@naveenthemachine]

I think for the Camry the xle and XSE look the most attractive front and back primarily because of the different led headlights and taillights vs the LE or SE. imo the xle XSE headlights look gorgeous especially the DRLs. And those xle XSE taillights at night they look luxurious imo

[@ttiwehde]

My wife drives the 2021 Accord touring hybrid ,with swapped 17” wheels and get an average 40 mpg . The 19 were rougher riding , 17 improved the ride, most definitely. We stayed with the widest 17 to keep the good handling and braking. Also added a space saver spare . She hated the Clarity looks, inside and out. Please Honda , make a phev Accord .Update May 22,2021.I have had the new Koenig wheels and Bridgestone quiettrack Turanza 235/50R17 now for four months, 5k miles with Mpg at 37 over those months, 60/40 city/hwy driving I can get 43 if I slow down, but it’s a lot of fun driving in sport mode and getting the adaptive suspension to help me corner fast.Love the traction feel of wider tires, even with the loss of mpg. So its, mpg :Massive Performace Grip for me, Not Mpg that matters most.

[@Smileydudekxy]

But the 19 look so much better lol I think that’s why they added them

[@rightlanehog3151]

#SaveSideWall

[@markmiller3279]

A PHEV needs a MUCH bigger battery and electric motor(s), and that usually requires planning for that from the start. That's an advantage Toyota has - they plan for hybrids from the start, including possibly Prime PHEV models. I doubt this Accord could be retrofitted with such a system. That may happen on the next generation.

[@ralphmcmahan2139]

Please let me outlive the two-tone wheel trend. Bleh.

[@sleekitwan]

A decent hybrid family car. I especially like the ‘Quentin Tarantino’ approach to trunk size measurement. Take care all.