Some of the differences pointed out between the -70 and the -90 are actually just content differences between trim levels, or phev vs. inline 6, while others are differences between the -70 and -90 themselves. This is a good video to see them side by side, but interested folks should spend some time w Mazda marketing materials to see what options come where. For example: painted vs unpainted wheel arches (is phev vs. inline 6), screen size is trim level, 360 degree camera is trim level (on either model)…
@whitelion6s459Ай бұрын
Sick looking Mazda😲
@WalserAutoАй бұрын
Agreed! Thanks for watching!
@mrgold359113 күн бұрын
I have a 19 MDX Sport Hybrid and love the powertrain, very sporty handling, space, and 25-27 mpg always (425-450 miles per 19.4 gal gas tank). Acura is out of the hybrid game and Lexus hybrid SUV don't have the sporty driving dynamics of Acura. The CX-70 with the hybrid or PHEV powertrain is top on my list as a replacement in a few years.
@domdrty23 сағат бұрын
So you pay more/same money for a CX70 with less seats and very little additional storage. It should cost less
@smooth37Ай бұрын
There's no captains chair option in the CX-70 and the second row ventilated seats are missing even though the button space on the back of the center console is there. The 2026 version might hvae them.
@DraakMDАй бұрын
Captain'l seats in a 5 seater?? No one's going to buy a 50k+ SUV that's a 4 seater.
@smooth37Ай бұрын
@@DraakMD Make it an option and see what happens. It's the configuration that I want.
@joronbriceАй бұрын
That's why they made the cx90 for you, sir
@hamburgler124Ай бұрын
cx70 would be perfect if it just looked the same as the cx90 but kept the black trim
@RippinCigsandThrowinDartsАй бұрын
How much bigger in the body and specifically interior is the cx 70 to the cx50? I drove the cx50 for the first time recently and it was nice but, felt a bit too cramped for my liking. I know it’s a compact suv but it was pretty compact… plus in the random times I have passengers in the car I definitely feel they’ll be cramped, especially the taller ones and won’t enjoy the ride, especially if a much longer trip
@WalserAutoАй бұрын
Thanks for watching! The CX-70 does offer a fair amount of space more compared to the CX-50. When you look at the EPA Passenger comparison here is what you will see: CX-70: 141.6 CU FT CX-50: 100.3 CU FT We provided the links to both vehicles below so you can see in-depth how much legroom/headroom/cargo space is available for each! CX-70: www.mazdausa.com/vehicles/cx-70/compare-vehicle-specs-and-trims CX-50: www.mazdausa.com/vehicles/cx-50/compare-vehicle-specs-and-trims If you'd like to browse our current inventory, click here: www.walser.com/mazda/
@RhondaPerez-m3bКүн бұрын
Gonzalez Kenneth Jackson Jose Miller Kimberly
@SherylThompson-m8f23 күн бұрын
Martinez Ruth Jones Timothy Miller Kimberly
@triodekt66Ай бұрын
You go through all those descriptions, but I don’t know why you don’t take a simple tape measure and give us a couple of simple dimensions in the cargo compartment! Kind of useless review without knowing what all fit in the back don’t you think?
@yeahumnahАй бұрын
That sounds like a lame review, unless it's purpose is to focus on cargo size. Why aren't you disappointed he didn't spend 10 minutes talking about the kind of cow the leather is made from?
@michaels798424 күн бұрын
Its essentially the same vehicle, the only real difference in cargo is that there is a little additional storage underneath the floor in the cargo area where the third row was, other than that it is negligible and not enough of a difference to bother measuring.
@yournightmare9999Ай бұрын
If you can't afford cx90 stay with cx70 that simple. Stay away now with cx90 and 70 they have to many recalls right now
@aVeryCleverNameАй бұрын
What recalls? I do not see any. Do you have a link?
@PaulHunt-ur8wjАй бұрын
Dude on here just posting BS. A simple google search proves this statement incorrect.
@ncvmanАй бұрын
Get a highlander or pilot. 57k for a Mazda lol.
@alb0zfinestАй бұрын
Mazda was ranked by car and driver in 2022 as the most reliable car brand, and 3rd in 2024. What do Toyota and Honda have that Mazda doesn't? They're basically similar in reliability, but the mazda looks 10 times better.
@ncvmanАй бұрын
@@alb0zfinest Mazda has had numerous recalls, transmission hunting, suspension you feel everything, third row space sucks, no touchscreen, center console too wide, door pockets too small. Basically it’s a nice looking car but not practice especially for 57k +. Its a lease vehicle
@JaketheSnake-lz1pqАй бұрын
You miss the point this is a 2 row SUV this is rwd bias with awd and an inline six turbo they are not in the same class the cx70 is far superior in driving ,looks, power, built. Honda and Toyota are run of the mill vehicles Mazda is a step above.
@MrDroid051822 күн бұрын
@@ncvman Toyota and Honda have their own unique shortcomings as well. Toyota happens to be bland as hell with no good driving dynamics. Honda reliability hasn’t been a squeaky clean as you might think The rest comes down preferences Mazda is basically offering a Kirkland signature Bmw