2024 Subaru Impreza RS - POV Driving Impressions

[@fuze3522]

If they gave it the FA24 2.4l N/A motor from the BRZ and gave it a 6 speed box, it would be worthy of that RS title

[@subterraneanguitartech]

I would throw down on that car in a heartbeat if it was real.

[@hhaste]

​@@subterraneanguitartech Just curious why, when you could buy a WRX? I can't figure out why they would build something like that when most people who are interested in something like that would either go WRX or BRZ/GR86. Or are you looking for something naturally aspirated that's also AWD?

[@thegiant17]

Honestly, just a 6 speed would make it worthwhile. Subaru's CVT is GARBAGE. There's literally nothing good I can say about it, and I say that as someone who owns a car with their CVT. I'd honestly take a hit in MPG happily for a swap to a standard automatic or better yet a manual.

[@fuze3522]

@@thegiant17 My dad has a '19 3.6R Touring. and i love its high torque CVT automatic.. on the highway. attempt to do any high performance driving and it falls apart. But it does get pretty good fuel economy. It is not a performance car transmission in the slightest. If the RS had the WRX's SPT transmission.. maybe it would be a bit better. I really think it needs a 6 speed tho.

[@SerPurple51]

​@@fuze3522I think the biggest gripe with CVT's is they're notoriously unreliable. Especially coming from a Subaru who doesn't have the best reputation for reliability.

[@devo6704]

bro this looks better than the wrx, if they brought back the sti hatch on this body it would've been so sickkkk

[@ken_in_atx9619]

As an owner of a 2018 Forester XT, it’s so weird how Subaru sees “sport trim” as tacky red accents. They stripped the turbo from the 2019 Forester and added the red trim.

[@Unchainedmaple888]

Better than how Sport means gaudy yellow/gold accents all over the Crosstrek lol

[@kylehurlbrink]

Cheaper for the manufacturer to produce.

[@boygonewhoopdataZZ]

Toyota TURD has entered the chat

[@ryanchandler6451]

One of the last good subaru's built. Good job. I drive a 17 xt and it's seen both oceans twice. Only part I hate is no hood scoop, so everyone just thinks it's a forester "sport".

[@hontonix1413]

@@Unchainedmaple888 I agree! I was wanting to buy Sport Crosstrek, but after seeing that yellow accents, I decided to just go for Premium model

[@YocoWheelin]

Being a Subaru fan for over a decade, and have owning a RS coupe back in the day I’m glad how harsh you were on this. Subaru missed the mark and they need to know it.

[@Panzil]

I gotta lie I'm really impressed.

[@jdeltaruff]

Hold up... can't tell if you mistyped or meant that 😂

[@Panzil]

@@jdeltaruff I meant exactly what I said. 😅

[@thegiant17]

You took the words right out of @thetopher 's mouth.

[@viveksoty]

🤣

[@ducatil-twin3379]

hahaaa

[@BahhJustaLamb]

I had a similar impression of this car. I felt that it really needed perhaps a revised version of the BRZ engine making ~220 HP. Not sure how many of you remember, but in 2009 Subaru had basically three performance Imprezas. The WRX and STI of course, but also the "Impreza 2.5GT". It had the old WRX's 220 or so HP whereas the incoming WRX jumped to 265. I think that rather than going with a 180HP 2.4RS, they could have had a 2.4GT. I suspect it would sell vastly better in this configuration rather than as it is now. The WRX base can be had AT MSRP (or less) for about $31,000. I negotiated a Premium with keyless entry, STI short throw and the bigger screen for only about $32,000 despite MSRP being $34,000. That makes a WRX Premium only about $3,000 more than the Impreza RS. For that $3,000, I gained 80lb/ft of torque and 90 HORSEPOWER, as well as a true performance car suspension setup. If there was a 220HP Impreza 2.4GT available in auto and manual for $29,000, I suspect it would start eating into Civic Si sales in no time. Subaru already has an N/A 4cyl that can make over 200HP with an excellent powerband. Had they used such a design for a sport compact, it would be a game changer in today's market. As is, if you MUST have a hatch, the Crosstrek is the better choice, as it's available with the same engine for not really more money, and has the benefit of offroad-capable ground clearance.

[@bsr6823]

Same just leased a premium WRX for the base model price. Would not think of getting the RS with the current spec

[@AkinaCelica]

Not everyone wants the high ground clearance, some of us still love hatchbacks and sedan's and the previous gen Impreza is a much better car

[@BahhJustaLamb]

@@AkinaCelicaI'm in that camp myself. That's why I wish this car just had a bit more grunt.

[@AkinaCelica]

@@BahhJustaLamb I feel like Subaru are losing their identity. The new Impreza looks horrible, as does obviously the Crosstrek and so does the Forester now too. I love all Subaru's not just fast ones and the previous cars are so much nicer. The only good looking Subaru's now are the Levorg, WRX and BRZ

[@horNNN_]

They shoulda gave us this in WRX form.

[@taelee347]

Yep.. just steal the whole WRX drivetrain and put it in here. Heck, detune it if you have to call it an RS/GT whatever so they don't "compete" with the WRX name.

[@Konformation07]

​@@taelee347 Or they can just give us the Levorg

[@davidsucks922]

I've been thinking about this and how putting the WRX engine in stuff like the Crosstrek or the Forester would be such an easy slam dunk that there must be some reason they're not doing it.... then I saw the WRX gets EPA rating of 21mpg avg. I almost guarantee the only reason they're not putting it in other cars is because of fleet average MPG laws... that being said I honestly think they should scrap the sedan WRX and use the hatch body instead, they're going for the utilitarian look anyways might as well make it actually useful

[@brandongrover1168]

A WRX hatch would sell like bonkers. I know I'd trade mine in for one

[@growingup4487]

@@brandongrover1168 no it wouldn't

[@stevenr1354]

Nice review. Thanks for talking me out of it. I'll stick with a Civic hatchback if I can find one at MSRP.

[@BigAltimaEnergy719]

Unfortunately Subaru stopped caring about their enthusiast customers when they announced the discontinuation of the STI cars…

[@lilmoris1]

Turns out "enthusiast customers" didn't buy them either. A company has to make money.

[@hhaste]

That's simply not true. They're going to continue it soon, with something else. It will most likely be a hybrid based performance car. They've already filed for trademarks using the name called "STe". If they didn't care about enthusiasts, they wouldn't make models of the Crosstrek like the Wilderness. It's a different kind of enthusiast but still, enthusiast. The WRX is nearly equally as good as the former STi. The only thing it's missing is Brembo's, basically. Performance wise, it's equal.

[@BigAltimaEnergy719]

@@hhaste Making the “STe” as a WRX with cvt and hybrid system is blasphemy to most Subaru enthusiasts

[@dannytse8767]

@@lilmoris1 Being a small automaker, Subaru needs funding to make the jump to EVs. It is already having a hard time delivering hybrids. Can't rely on Toyota forever.

[@M3vilDaygo]

The new WRX is a de tuned sti. 350 hp with access port and bolt ons. enthusiasts would know this. Gas is not going to best electric in performance. So why waste the money? The law is enforcing electric vehicles. An enthusiast would know. 🤷‍♂️

[@tpolerex7282]

It’s a solid handling, stiff chassis, great riding, good power, quiet and comfortable, feature filled AWD hatch. It’s not a WRX hatch but neither was the original RS. I drove a new, ‘99 RS coupe, for a week courtesy of my buddy owning a Subaru dealership. It is what sold me on the brand buying an ‘02 WRX wagon a couple years later. This seems to fulfill most of the qualities of the original, albeit less cool and no manual. This works for me, but I’m keeping the WRX.

[@Aerodynamicz1]

Really just wish they offered a manual

[@Josh.Davidson]

Maybe they'll listen like Toyota did with the Supra and add it back.

[@CapFlipGaming]

Loved my 2014 a few years ago. Not sure this has enough power to keep me happy though. But they are fantastic commuter cars. They are incredible in the snow as well.

[@paul3180]

I have a 2013 Sport that I love, had it 10 years this week, the lack of power is really the only downside to the car. Especially when I live a mile above sea level. An Impreza Sport with a manual and the engine out of the new BRZ is what Subaru needs to build for us.

[@hhaste]

@@paul3180 Just curious why, when you could buy a WRX? I can't figure out why they would build something like that when most people who are interested in something like that would either go WRX or BRZ/GR86. Or are you looking for something naturally aspirated that's also AWD?

[@LillaVya]

I have a 2015, and I absolutely love it. Never gotten stuck anywhere, gas mileage is pretty good too, but it feels a bit lacking in power at times. I'm super glad I got the 5-speed in it because it made the car 10x as fun to drive, but I'm pretty sad to notice that Subaru seems to want to can the manual transmissions for newer entry-level cars

[@canadious6933]

@@hhaste Price of an impreza is like half that of a wrx where I live on the used market and the impreza has half the amount of use than the wrx.

[@jasonmoyer]

This and the Wilderness Crosstrek would be fun dailies if they came with a stick. It's sad when even Subaru are abandoning manual transmissions in their entry level cars.

[@lilmoris1]

Manuals are completely irrelevant these days. DCT's are superior.

[@boygonewhoopdataZZ]

I hate this kind of talk like why even bring it up when you're not going to buy a new Manuel car? 😂

[@dannytse8767]

@@boygonewhoopdataZZ Come on, most of the people posting comments are not buying any new cars. Subaru or otherwise. After all, talk is cheaper than buying a new car.

[@RatAvenue]

Lol no one cross-shopping a cross trek and Impreza cares about a manual. There’s a reason manufacturers are moving on to autos and CVTs, because no one buys NEW manual cars.

[@K03sport]

@@boygonewhoopdataZZ ... I tried to buy, or at least look at a manual Crosstrek in 2019. The nearest one to me (here in SW Ohio) was more than 300 miles away and it was a base model. The nearest Premium manual Crosstrek was more than 500 miles away. I bought my 6th choice, a manual WRX. Subaru killed it themselves with low availability.

[@Phiz787]

I find this car to be the perfect Niche. Yes, it isn't what the enthusiast hopes and dreams desire. It's not a turbo Impreza. 5 Speed. Hatchback WRX. But it has excellent handling, is a better value than the crosstrek for an urban commuter and the gas mileage is still good. My wife needs a car soon and this is the one. Light, nimble, easy to park, safe to drive in PNW. 10/10 for our needs.

[@chrisrader8547]

Similar reasons for why I bought one. I liked it just fine. I’ve owned a WRX, and this is not that, obviously. But, for what it does and what my needs are, I am content.

[@mickeybrumfield764]

You can buy a Legacy premium for less money and get 35mpg not 33mpg with the same engine.

[@mushieslushie]

People that complain it's not available as a sedan don't remember the legacy exists.

[@aliniazi2002]

182hp with no manual option. Proper NPC car for the masses badged to make it look sporty.

[@XAMPOL]

It lost me at 182hp and "CVT", definitely an NPC car

[@kingofthenerds7925]

NPC car is a perfect description 💀

[@DeathProfessor]

NPCs buy SUVs

[@janoycresnova9156]

Amen

[@chrislim7976]

Every automatic is an npc car. Ok.

[@igknyte]

I really really hate Subarus infotainment and air controls now.. it requires extra attention to change where you want the airflow while driving. Bring back the knobs!

[@nowiecoche]

100%.

[@Baebon6259]

Subaru screwed this up by not adding a manual to this.

[@corrodesthefilm]

11:39 nice save

[@davesmith5092]

I really wish they'd bring back the WRX wagon and put a goddamn six speed in there again.

[@SHiFTDI3S3L]

It needs a manual. It has to be possible. MCM took a Levorg and swapped it to manual without a peep from the ECU. They were lucky that there were interior bits that could be swapped in. If the same is true for this car, it has to be possible, it just has to be done.

[@zooropa8297]

RS gets HK stereo but it’s an option package

[@aintrxiden]

god that infotainment system looks like my 2012 samsung galaxy s3

[@neometalx9]

Subaru obsession with CVT gotta stop... I think it's gonna stop when they go all electric lol

[@chaarleess]

Electric cars don't have gear ratios 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@ReyaadGafur]

@@chaarleess CVT dont either.

[@maxd4968]

It’s less an obsession more it’s there only option

[@neometalx9]

@@chaarleess that's why they'll stop by then, because it won't have a transmission... Lol

[@ShockinglyBleh]

I think Subaru will be bought out by Toyota by then lol.

[@Mike.Macmyazka]

Well I was excited when I initially heard RS was making a comeback. I had hoped for a little more power than the other 2.5 cars. But they clearly aren’t marketing it the same as the old days. It looks great and the feature set is good enough with the exception of the audio. Wish it had a little better system or an option for upgrade. One last thought. A little bit more spoiler would make it look even better. Guess I will have to see it in person and maybe drive it to see if it’s worth the money to me. First impression for the money is not worth it. Sadly.

[@K03sport]

... and gold wheels. can't forget the gold wheels.

[@Mike.Macmyazka]

@@K03sport I’ve purchased aftermarket wheels for every car I have owned since 2007 so that doesn’t even matter. Not to mention that not all 2.5 RS had gold wheels back then. That is the same to me as choosing a paint color. Doesn’t really matter.

[@moonwolf975]

So basically the only improvements from the 2020 Sport are more power, and wireless carplay / charging, and a temperature gauge But now you have to deal with: disabling start stop every time, no manual ebrake, bad / laggy infotainment (wasn't an issue on 2020 since it was barely used), and is missing manual buttons, no sedan model, no manual option, weird placed cupholder / place for your phone, more costly, apparently a bump on the pedal At that point buy a brz, civic, or mazda 3

[@djSmokeShow]

I have a new BRZ and a Legacy and can't help but feel like this RS is a huge miss. It should have had the more powerful 2.4 BRZ motor and a six speed option, ESPECIALLY for that price point.

[@hhaste]

I agree but also, why when you could just buy a WRX? It wouldn't be this price point if I had the 2.4 and 6 speed, definitely higher.

[@djSmokeShow]

@@hhaste Both my BRZ and my Legacy were 30k a piece. I'm no expert, but based on that I feel that Subaru could have put the 2.4 in the RS and sold it for the same price. And the reason for wanting that configuration over the WRX (awesome car) is because an AWD hatch with a strong naturally aspirated engine would be pretty cool. It's actually not my cup of tea either way, just sharing my thoughts. Overall Subaru is putting out some great vehicles.

[@Ben-bs4od]

Love this car. Just wish there were a little more power. But it's almost perfect. Wish the Corolla had an AWD hybrid with the same engine as the Corolla Cross hybrid. That would be good competition for this.

[@chucktownattack]

I was literally deciding between these two cars and the Mazda and WRX of course. Went with the RS. No regrets in this market- car shopping was absolutely miserable this time around. Coof disease changed the whole process.

[@user-cy1ru4cg2s]

Manual transmission please!!! Otherwise, not interested. I miss my 2004. 😢

[@chrisrader8547]

I chose this over the Crosstrek because I am tired of black plastic cladding. And, I wanted a car, not a CUV. I don’t live on a dirt road, I don’t do the off-road thing or care to. Hence, I don’t need the extra ground clearance the Crosstrek offers.

[@anthonyng3014]

Even in the city, CUV/SUVs can be easier to park due to being able to clear nearly all curbs/bars. The Impreza not so much. I owned a 2007 Impreza up until earlier this year when I switched to an Outback XT and not having to worry about curbs has been quite the experience. Of course, being over a foot longer than the Impreza hasn't helped parking much...

[@tempestofruin]

My biggest complaint is that these car companies shove every control of HVAC and what not into the screen.

[@djSmokeShow]

I agree, that's why I love my 2023 BRZ, ALL of the AC controls are physical knobs and buttons and they are really good ones to boot.

[@tempestofruin]

@@djSmokeShow I'm fine with pretty much all other controls kn the screen, just not HVAC!

[@ScorpioMotivation]

No manual transmission, no manual handbrake, no more sti... I mean come on Subaru

[@RawieRozay]

Why can't Subaru just call it a day and put the 2.4L turbo in this? This looks way better than the WRX to me.

[@orberator]

This model with the 22+ WRX engine, a manual transmission, and an older infotainment would've been a perfect car imo. Ah man the missed opportunity...

[@McSteveIrwin]

Isn't that what we all want Just a gosh dang wrx hatchback

[@v8_sami]

@@McSteveIrwin apparently everyone wants one now that it’s gone….

[@hhaste]

Why? At that point, just buy a WRX lol..

[@jjacob25101]

Very good points. The stereo sounds pretty good on my phone and nice earbuds, but the optional package has the power seat, sunroof and Harman Kardon stereo, which like you stated must be even better.

[@kubap7398]

4:00 - The Impreza "RS" does not quite live up to that title, just like the Honda Civic "Sport" really has nothing sporty about it. Nowadays, I find trim designations to represent package add-ons instead of performance. If only the RS received a 5 speed, it would be worthy.

[@acrain7]

Why no manual?! The previous gen’s manual was simply fantastic, a proper direct linkage gearbox that instantly put a smile on your face even with the rev hang and no sway bar on a base model.

[@BigAltimaEnergy719]

They stuck with old school 5 speed for a long time, it would’ve been better with a 6 speed because of shorter gear ratios and additional overdrive gear

[@v8_sami]

Because America… everyone wants bigger cars and automatics/cvts. Manuals just don’t sell enough

[@BigAltimaEnergy719]

@@v8_sami most of the manual sold are in mostly performance cars not so much in regular cars

[@hhaste]

@@v8_sami Manuals sell fine, it just doesn't make any sense in a car like this.

[@chrislim7976]

Probably because the 5 people here that say they would buy one didn't.

[@stels39rus]

New Prius, for the same price, faster than that piece of marketing😂😢

[@cookiebhy8610]

the big laggy screen on the new suabrus is the only thing stopping me buying a subaru

[@brahsumatra]

It’s a great affordable car for those who need to get from point A to B.

[@avery4528]

$29k for an Impreza with a 2.5L is disgusting. Worth $23k

[@stayphun6188]

Seems like you guys finally get a little taste of car prices in Europe

[@tylerrynberg]

I know that Topher only compared the Impreza price vs. other Subarus, but a Civic Hatchback blows this thing out of the water for the same price...just get snow tires for winter if needed.

[@benjamindoyle668]

So does the AWD Mazda 3 which is a better car in so many ways

[@robob221]

not at all. The Subaru can do winter without winter tires or slip all over then place when it rains. I just test drove a new civic sport and it drives like a front wheel drive car. Subaru is for people that like driving a AWD car for its constant traction everywhere.

[@tylerrynberg]

@@robob221 that's nonsense. A FWD car with dedicated winter tires will handle snow/ice better than an AWD car on all seasons. Not sure what you mean by saying a Civic drives like a FWD...the Subaru Impreza understeers at least as much as a Civic at the limit. I grew up in Western Michigan with lake effect snow and did just fine without AWD.

[@robob221]

@@tylerrynberg I am not down playing the ability of winters tires, what I am saying is that if the rear wheels can drive you will have more control in snow and rain, that is physics. This is not an argument, winter tires are absolutely necessary on FWD when you want to get home in confidence for a reason, not the case for AWD. I am contemplating the importance of full time AWD myself as I am cross shopping a Mazda 3 awd, Impreza RS, and civic SI. I only get snow 30-60 days out of the year so for the most part, rain is really the enemy for spirited driving. That's where AWD shows its strength when you turn the wheel and accelerate. Other than that, the "on demand" system in the Mazda may be a great middle ground.

[@KG-kq9tk]

@robob221. "That's physics". Bro, you are so fundamentally wrong about this, yet so confident. AWD helps with getting power to all 4 wheels, but that has ZERO to do with traction or stopping power. Lookup any number of countless articles abd videos explaining the actual physics of this. TIRES are what matter, overwhelmingly, for winter driving. Because they are the point of contact on the slippery road. Front and back wheel drive cars with winter tires are absolutely safer in slippery conditions than any AWD vehicle not using winter tires. That AWD drive means nothing when trying to grip the road or come to a stop with tires that literally can't grip the road nearly as well. AWD helps in deeper snow or sand to accelerate or get over obstacles. It helps with overall handling. But tires are what REALLY matter for gripping. You are right that this is not an argument, but you are the one who is losing that argument. Its physics.

[@HobbesWiilTakeGoodCareOfYou]

When I think of RS, I think of fast car trims like a Ford ST product or what Porsche does with their RS cars. These automakers slapping "RS" on their cars for no reason with 0 performance changes/benefits is really stale.

[@anthonyng3014]

Wait wait, the RS gets the RACK AND PINION steering from the WRX! I'm sure that gets you a performance benefit doesn't it? It's too bad Subaru forgot about the meagre 180hp engine, suspension, brakes, and transmission, but you gotta forgive them when it's been over a decade since they've built a true performance-centered machine for the WRC.

[@GingkoMister]

180hp with that average fuel economy? Put a CVT in a RS and 29k? Subaru are out of their mind

[@scene4dummies]

Oof. I was so excited reading this title as I didn't even know Subaru released this, but man, Subaru just continues to drop the ball. I've owned a '98 Impreza, '02 WRX, '04 WRX, '11 WRX, and '18 STI. Finally left Subaru in '21, and I don't think I'll be buying another one anytime soon (most certainly not a newer one). I'm looking at getting another vehicle later this year, and if I stick with the $30kish price point I'll likely go with the Civid hatchback at this point.

[@anthonyfernando14]

Thank you for all your videos Topher you’re the man

[@jpringle1290]

That interior looks like it was from 2012

[@mrb401]

MT and oem roof rails. Then I’d only think about it. Although for snow regions, this might be a decent a to b awd daily in a couple yrs or so in the used market.

[@DavidDLee]

Test drove the 2L back in 2021. It had sufficient power, but the seatback was not agreeable to my back. I've been eyeing the Impreza since 2011, but never got one. It was always slow, had oil consumption issue back in 2012, and always a compromise. Unless they come out with a good PHEV or EV, it will never happen.

[@Rw.M240]

I feel like this is overall I pretty useless car. Isn’t fast isn’t good looking but still expensive

[@amazingtech2471]

HAHA agree

[@Panzil]

true dat

[@canadious6933]

I mean, depends on what you want. Not everyone wants a fast car. If you want a subaru with a hatchback and something that is practical and good on gas, this is a good option. As normally, the impreza is pretty underpowered, this does give it a boost. Plus it is a whole lot more comfortable than a wrx. So I wouldn't call it useless.

[@username8644]

​@@canadious6933 But the Corolla hatch and the golf GTI exist and both are better value for the money than this. And both are available with a MT.

[@FunkatronicDingus]

@@username8644 Corolla hatch is absolutely not practical at all, and a lot of people ignore VW because of the reputation of the brand.

[@faheemabbas3965]

Subaru’s CVT addiction is holding the company back badly… It’s destroying it

[@hhaste]

That's just not even close to true. I dislike CVT's as much as the next person but "destroying" it? lol.. I think they know what's best for their company more than you would. The fuel economy with a CVT beats the manual transmission. It has less weight without that heavy gearset and all those extra parts, a CVT has less mass, which helps fuel economy, handling, and acceleration. It's the perfect for for these cheap, everyday consumer cars. a 6 speed doesn't make any sense in a car like this. If someone wants anything else, they'll buy the WRX with the 6 speed.

[@user-hq4pj4cu7g]

I love watching your videos! Like you're the go to person when I'm looking into buying a car! Your videos are just so full of information and fun to watch! Thank you for your amazing content!

[@henrik1743]

Damn they really killed their impreza heritage huh

[@risingwind8943]

This is depressing. To slap an RS badge on something so bland and slow is a slap to any auto enthusiest. There is nothing fast or edgy about this car. It's just watered down. 180 hp? That's it??? This car is a lie. The RS badge is a lie. VERY Glad I got the Veloster N before it was stopped.

[@otanihidetora5221]

Can’t stand the fisher price tablet on this though

[@markthibault8579]

Desperately needs the manual. If they offered it, it would completely change the character of the car.

[@richardwilliams6256]

true but people dont buy manuals, people always say that but no one actually goes out and buys one in support of Subaru.

[@JonathanVaucher]

@richardwilliams6256 Just bought a 2021 STi MANUAL TRANSMISSION in 2023 because I did'nt want a CVT impreza with the anemic 152HP 2.0i base impreza. Only americans/canadians don't buy manuals... In Europe, manuals are still the rage !

[@MatthewGaither]

I'm glad Subaru is giving us a sportier trim of the Impeza and I do like the way this one looks. It's a shame though that most of the extra sportiness is just appearance based and not in the actual hardware or perforrmance.

[@jacksonlandry4797]

yeah, subaru has done an awful job with sport trims for the past couple years. I have a 2020 impreza sport and the only sport features are the tuned CVT with automated shifts, a sport mode, and a red accented interior. Still has 152hp and 145 lb/ft. of torque. It's mind-blowingly slow

[@nbain66]

​@@jacksonlandry4797my 2004 Legacy had 13 more hp and 20 more torque

[@tedskins]

I just bought a base model Impreza the other day. I test drove the RS and it just looked "sportier", but the drive wasn't any different from the bade model. Wasn't worth the extra money in my opinion, so I stuck with the base model

[@username8644]

For almost the same price I think the base model golf GTI makes a lot more sense. That being said this is still a solid purchase.

[@00TPOTTER]

Maybe I’m missing something but I don’t see much reason to get this over a Mazda3 hatch AWD. Mazda has the better fit and finish, infotainment, not a CVT, more power, etc.

[@armodudegiantfan]

You're not missing anything. The mazda3 and the Civic are infinitely better than this

[@ValFinale]

mazda3 has less cargo space, and awful visibility. It's also now (4th gen) too refined for it's own good and not fun at all to drive. This still has some rawness in it.

[@anthonyng3014]

@@ValFinale You raise great points that turned me off getting the Mazda 3 as well. The lack of visibility and super cramped rear seats were true deal-breakers. The 2024 Mazda 3 can almost be considered a 2-seater which CAN fit 2 more adults whom you dislike. However, in the end I went for the Outback XT with the powerplant that the RS should've gotten. The only thing I regret is now I'm driving a boat around, but the off-the-line power is definitely there.

[@ValFinale]

@@anthonyng3014 I’m actually looking to get an outback or a left over 2024 forester wilderness. I do a lot of outdoor shit and could use the space now living with my gf etc. I’m just stuck in a shitty lease I’m trying to lemon law hopefully it’s resolved soon I got offered 36k for the forester wilderness

[@MangoJam420]

He does not sound impressed. At all.

[@spathotan]

I can already see these slugging around town at 11/10ths driven by guys who couldnt afford a WRX. That RS badging will be truly empowering. Great review as always Topher

[@curiosityredpill7030]

You sound like a pocket watcher worrying about what others can afford on not afford that’s the problem wrong with world ppl always looking down at others!

[@upperleftnorthwest4278]

I swear i always see previous gen crosstreks speeding everywhere in oregon & wonder how people are able to do it with 140 hp haha

[@DeathProfessor]

Yeah how dare they enjoy the car they spent money on. They should've gotten the car with even more power, so they have to use even less of it on the streets. Otherwise elitists may talk shit about them online. That would matter so much

[@anthonyng3014]

The RS badging is worth 10hp. The RACK and PINION steering from the WRX is worth another 20hp. Lol what a joke Subaru's turned into.

[@shinymike4301]

With better cars available now, I can no longer understand why anyone buys a Subaru.

[@phungcanhngo]

It looks so beautiful!

[@Twikkilol]

My 2009 impreza looks more premium than this almost.. At least with the plastics etc. Hope they more cars like this though!

[@JonathanVaucher]

I feel the same. I own a gen 3 2008 Impreza Sport 2.5i Manual 5Dr hatchback (170HP) and a 2021 STi base model Sedan (310 HP). I kept the 2008 hatch because it's very practical for the space in the trunk (for example if I go to Ikea or I need to pick up bulky stuff) while still being fun to drive with the manual 5 speed and a 2.5 liter N/A 4 cyl. The STI is a blast in comparison to the 2.5i, but I don't want to drive the STI too often in the salty rustbelt during winter time and the sedan trunk is really not as practical, so I'm keeping the 2008 2.5i Hatch for winter and for transporting bulky stuff. I wish they had made the 2024 RS with a manual transmisson... at the very least a 5 speed if not a 6 speed. I'm thinking the 182 HP of the 2024 RS must feel quite anemic with a CVT transmission.

[@sebastianbuse8474]

Subaru dropped the ball HARD

[@kidnamedfinger6323]

Glad to see Subaru is putting a true engine temp gauge in there. Also, it's disappointing Subaru didn't rework the seat positioning. I drive a 2022 Impreza and feel the seat could go lower even when it's at the lowest setting. And that's when i'm only 5'11".

[@MrJoe-wd4lz]

The 2024 model is supposed to be quieter than the 2023 model; did you notice a difference in noise reduction?

[@TheTopher]

Definitely, noticeably less road/wind noise

[@masonranalla9405]

From the side reminds me of like a ford focus hatch/RS/ST

[@iakpwnzjoolol]

except those actually made good power, unlike subarus

[@X2tream_Arrow]

This engine should have been standard.

[@wtfx5757]

RS? LOL, not this one boys

[@user-yi4to3bl1b]

Nice the new mazda 3

[@Demonhellcat492]

Why don't they offering with torque converter?

[@lucasputrakul4365]

Man, those wheels look so similar to the stock wheels that are one the Wrx lol

[@qilin6634]

Subaru missing all the marks lately. Moving towards a new direction and disregarding why some of us even like Subaru in the first place. Killed off the STi, butchered the new WRX gen looks (still drives nice though), and now… this. I cri

[@dannytse8767]

And yet the WRX is breaking sales records and the Wilderness lineup has sold over 75,000 units.

[@stylomuerto9311]

So it became a smaller mazda CX5 on the outside

[@pbmcgme176]

I have had it with Subaru. They are using the RS badge to imply this vehicle is something that it's not. They stripped the Forester of the turbo and put one in the most feminine machine they make. They put the sport label on the Forester after adding tacky red accents. They took away a proper WRX in place of some ugly new model that no one likes which is why they are heavily discounted now. The got rid of the wrx sti hatchback but have the nerve to give us this trash which is nothing more than a basic Impreza with black wheels and badges. As a prior XT Forester owner(yes with a CVT which I gave into)...I have never gone back to Subaru since their decision to scrap the turbo and don't be fooled they toned down their awd programming to protect their CVT rather than strengthen the CVT itself. This is why their awd is no longer any good. If you watch all the independent testing done it's pretty obvious.

[@oliverroo59]

The whole point of the RS is to be hustled, so when you said it doesn't like to be hustled, that's a fail in my book.

[@richardwilliams6256]

Sad to see Subaru fading away but they deserve some of this. No manual transmission and this bs powerplant. No thanks, they can keep this. The only good thing they did of late was the STI-S209 and hope to get a low-mileage one soon.

[@XR4turbo]

"Does not like to be hustled". So, job 1 failed. This thing is such a cynical marketing exercise to expand the economy of scale of offering the 2.5 in the Crosstrek.

[@SerPurple51]

I like the hatch styling. But I could never see myself owning a modern Subaru except for the BRZ. The CVT route is a bad choice in my opinion. I feel like they're doing it mostly to try and bump up their fuel economy numbers without developing a more efficient engine, or a transmission with more gears. I like the screen, but also seems a bit busy and lack of physical buttons is disappointing. Interior otherwise is ok. I personally believe most common folks only buy Subaru these days for the name. Most think because they're in a "Subaru" they're safer and can tackle any weather and conditions. I can't really see why you'd choose this over the loads of other cars out there.

[@MrCarGuy]

I'll give it 8 years before it totally falls apart

[@TheCldmstrsn]

I love this! we have a 2019 sport impreza hatch and absolutely adore it. Will most likely trade that in for this, nice power bump too.

[@dannytse8767]

I went from a '19 Crosstrek Premium (same 2 liter engine as your '19 Impreza Sport) to a '21 Crosstrek Sport (same engine as the Impreza RS) and the difference is very noticeable.

[@greylonbrady]

Good chance this will be the last Impreza.

[@Majelvey]

Looks like a ford Focus/Fiesta.

[@stayphun6188]

Also looks a bit like a Hyundai or Opel

[@microwveman2063]

Subaru really thinks adding red to the car makes it faster lol

[@alpenjodel24]

Subaru really went the Nissan route. No exciting cars anymore. Even the BRZ is kinda overshadowed by the GR86 in terms of desirability and the „hype“ created brand wise …

[@ZenZill]

I have a 2019 Impreza 2.0 CVT. I don't think any enthusiast would spend the money on this car. It's made for nobody. A lot of reviewers are dismayed by the drivetrain, but don't want to trash it completely because of the entire package. This isn't an Impreza Sport, it's an RS! It deserves the disrespect.

[@matejdimos5749]

I think that if they make this car in manual it would feel a lot quicker

[@bsr6823]

Facts! I have a 2023 manual Crosstrek base model which is extremely slow but it FEELS fast with the manual

[@loki_wolff]

Idk why anyone would get this over a Mazda 3 hatch turbo for about the same price. Way more power, has AWD too, and has a regular transmission.

[@dannytse8767]

About the same price?

[@loki_wolff]

@@dannytse8767 yea

[@cinnamontoast9999]

I gotta say, I really hate the red seats, wish it had other options, especially since their colors have been traditionally blue/yellow/white

[@cryxbaby2250]

I like that everyone gets in a car and says oh this is slow what a shitty car haha.

[@Jason-nk3md]

If they can make this... They can make a WRX hatchback. I don't know why they don't, would sell like hotcakes.

[@jasonmok4110]

Would’ve pick up a cx5 or crosstrek for this money…

[@Waxxumus]

Man they didnt even put an AT on it?! WTF A CVT?!

[@hhaste]

CVT in this car is better than anything else.. and I hate CVT's.

[@Mockkingdre]

Collector car of the future?

[@Mockkingdre]

As I later was the video my comment is took back

[@gati54uri094]

Unfortunately that subaru doesn't have dual clutch gearbox. But that impreza RS must be 6 speed manual.

[@jerm_]

now can we get a WRX with this styling and no cheap plastic cladding??????

[@dfk09]

I love hatchbacks/liftbacks....

[@Mouzourakism]

Gotta love Michigan roads