Tap to unmute

2024 Ta-You Wu Lecture in Physics

  Рет қаралды 1,337

University of Michigan

University of Michigan

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 3
@charlesbrightman4237
@charlesbrightman4237 11 ай бұрын
GRAVITY ACTING IN ONE DIRECTION, A POSSIBLE REASON WHY: (And possibly anti-gravity?): a. 'Gravity' appears to only act in one way, an attractive force. b. A 'normal' photon normally rotates in a certain direction as the electrical and magnetic portions of the photon complement each other. c. "IF" my TOE idea is correct, that gravity is a part of currently recognized 'em', gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other, and the photon would normally spin in a certain direction, then that could possibly be why gravity is only an attractive force. d. "IF" true, then by changing the 'em' coherent normally inter-related directions, maybe it's possible to generate artificial gravity?
@charlesbrightman4237
@charlesbrightman4237 11 ай бұрын
PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS: Potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements: I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2). Chemical Element #119 (8s1): #119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell. Chemical Element #120 (8s2): #120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars. When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way. In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically). If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better. (Except of course for those who might be in the way of a periodic nova or supernova. They might have a no good, very bad, horrible day.)
@charlesbrightman4237
@charlesbrightman4237 11 ай бұрын
IN THE INTEREST OF FINDING THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING: SOME THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW: Consider the following: a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics). b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually warp and expand. c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually warp and vary. d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. And for those who claim that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c' above. e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also warp, expand and vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can warp, expand and vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could warp, expand and vary in actual reality? f. Photons: A photon swirls with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. A photon is also considered massless. What keeps the 'e' and 'm' energy fields together across the vast universe? And why doesn't the momentum of the 'e' and 'm' energy fields as they swirl about not fling them away from the central area of the photon? And electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency. Why doesn't the 'e' and 'm' of other photons and of matter basically tear apart a photon going across the vast universe? Also, 'if' a photon actually red shifts, where does the red shifted energy go and why does the photon red shift? And for those who claim space expanding causes a photon to red shift, see 'b' above. Why does radio 'em' (large 'em' waves) have low energy and gamma 'em' (small 'em' waves) have high energy? And for those who say E = hf; see also 'b' and 'c' above. (f = frequency, cycles per second. But modern science claims space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary. If 'space' warps and expands and/or 'time' warps and varies, what does that do to 'E'? And why doesn't 'E' keep space from expanding and time from varying?). g. Energy: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." How exactly is 'energy' eternally existent? h. Existence and Non-Existence side by side throughout all of eternity. How? * ADDED NOTE: My current TOE idea can potentially answer all of these above items, and more, in a logical, coherent and inter-related manner. And wouldn't one expect the true TOE of existence itself to be able to do that? What other TOE idea in known existence can currently do that? Surely not the General or Special Relativity Models nor even the Standard Model of Particle Physics. TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe. The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. I am open to any and all theory of everything ideas that can potentially answer all those above items in a logical, coherent and inter-related manner. Currently, as far as I am currently aware of, there are no others but my own.
Saturday Morning Physics | The Many Worlds of Quantum Mechanics
1:26:16
University of Michigan
Рет қаралды 4,5 М.
By Design: Behe, Lennox, and Meyer on the Evidence for a Creator
1:24:30
Hoover Institution
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
Their Boat Engine Fell Off
0:13
Newsflare
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
Вопрос Ребром - Джиган
43:52
Gazgolder
Рет қаралды 3,8 МЛН
$1 vs $500,000 Plane Ticket!
12:20
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 122 МЛН
Ford Distinguished Lecture - 2023
1:41:01
University of Michigan
Рет қаралды 2,7 М.
The Paradoxes of Time Travel
1:02:35
Linda Hall Library
Рет қаралды 441 М.
2024 Ta-You Wu Lecture - Constraints on Quantum Gravity - Hirosi Ooguri
1:19:42
University of Michigan
Рет қаралды 1,4 М.
A Conscious Universe? - Dr Rupert Sheldrake
1:22:44
The Weekend University
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
2023 Annual Ford Lecture in Physics | Secrets of Einstein's Equation - Sean Carroll
1:38:37
How Did The Universe Begin?
2:26:46
History of the Universe
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
Chaos theory and geometry: can they predict our world? - with Tim Palmer
1:10:25
The Royal Institution
Рет қаралды 234 М.
Their Boat Engine Fell Off
0:13
Newsflare
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН