2025 Mazda CX-70 | First Drive

[@Livin_is_life]

I'm not old & I like it. I'm In my 30s & I find it attractive. Nice job Mazda

[@Stinger430]

I'm a single guy with no kids, and I can't believe how much I like the CX-70/CX-90. So well designed! And the sun visors look top shelf too.

[@hereigoagain5050]

Big enough to make kids in the back. :)

[@CarsandTechInfo]

@@hereigoagain5050 Facts lol 😂

[@tdlewis103]

My kids are grown and gone and I just bought one. They are great!

[@Stinger430]

@@tdlewis103 Congrats!

[@beccab2522]

My hubby and I just test drove the CX70. Loved the power, torque, and ride. Looks big on the outside at first, but it's perfect for us. Handled great.

[@DavidLLambertmobile]

The CX70 SUV is good for people who want a SUV for 2025-2030 era. Before major changes ⛽️ ....

[@joelewis8992]

One question how is it on gas mileage

[@beccab2522]

So far its been well as expected. Averaging 23 mpg city. For us, thats good. Havent taken it on the highway/freeway yet@@joelewis8992

[@patrickjones8209]

Not everyone thinks 3 rows are desirable. I much prefer the 2 row design and would not consider 3 row alternatives. Mazda understands that there are two completely different buyers. 2 rows mean more cargo room, less weight and, in this case, a sportier character with subtle design cues that differ from the CX-90.

[@hellbunny9394]

Mazda could just offer a third roll delete option on the CX-90.

[@iceman.83]

Sometimes do you feel like you are talking to walls?

[@DeeEllEff]

@@hellbunny9394 I’ve got one incoming, yet I do agree with supporting a 3rd row delete option. They could even match the lower CX-90 Preferred trim in price so people would shut up about “paying more money for fewer seats.” Or would they?

[@puravida5683]

I bought the CX-90 Turbo S Premium Plus instead! Because........the pricing was the same as the CX-70, I basically got the 3rd row free. And, I just fold down the seats, and lay a mat.

[@DeeEllEff]

@@puravida5683 Understood. I don’t have any problem with that; but I just have a mental block on that third row. (I chose the PHEV because at low speeds it was smoother than the mild hybrid.)

[@JulieMoran1832]

Picked up a CX70 last weekend. LOVE IT!

[@DavidLLambertmobile]

What color? I'd lean to blue/gray or the tan model. My sister has a older CX9 2012.

[@2269tah]

May I please ask what was your "OUT THE DOOR" Price?

[@tdlewis103]

Me too. Love the straight 6 and the turbo!

[@nicecook12]

I am getting mine later today. Polymetal Gray Metallic Red Nappa Leather Leather

[@laurielavallee411]

@@nicecook12best combination. Enjoy!

[@adamdavis4074]

Just bought one - coming from an Alfa Stelvio, but needed more space. I chose this over a CX90 because I am single/childless, but I have a dog that needs a bench seat. I also prefer the subtle styling differences over the CX90. With PHEV incentives, it ended up being a great lease deal. Very impressed so far - it has a wonderful interior

[@bUtMyRiGhTs]

Your torque output for the standard engine is wrong. The standard engine torque output is around 332 ft lb.

[@dwaynepavelka1801]

This was one of the best videos on this model. I just picked mine up yesterday. I haven’t really gotten the opportunity to enjoy it yet. After watching this video, I feel really good about decision to purchase the CX70. Again, well done!!

[@Wbrooks01]

I have a CX50 and really want this as my next car

[@elyse6688]

I cannot wait for this to come to Australia. This looks perfect for my family of 4.

[@grmmjhnsn2]

That inline six sound humming in the background...SONOROUS!!!

[@raymondgraber9629]

They just announced the cx80 in Europe, 4" shorter, could have brought that here maybe in a wide version with 2 rows. But that would make too much sense.

[@dr3amboy3657]

Exactly. The exec who green lighted this should be fired. All they had to do was bring the cx80 over; less development costs and enough differences to entice buyers between the cx90.

[@farcinue]

They should bring the cx60 to the US!

[@camilogomezkeep2324]

They should! I hoped in one here in Colombia and is literally the same size as the cx-90 inside.... which is why I feel the 90 is really cramped for its size.

[@candlercando]

They should discontinue the cx50 and build the cx60 in its place.

[@arni7810]

Yes..the cx 60 which is shoeter😮😮😮

[@Ziakel]

They coulda bring the CX-60 from other markets. The CX-70 shoulda been a trim option. People want a slightly larger and more upscaled CX-50 not a 3rd row delete CX-90

[@DeadAir21]

The CX-60 would have been too expensive for what it is. They will sell more 70’s than they will 60’s

[@Ziakel]

@@DeadAir21 we’ll see about sale numbers. Both top trim CX-90 and CX-70 are about the same price at $56k. Why would anyone pick a 3rd row delete for the same price?

[@DeadAir21]

@@Ziakel you know you’ll never use the third row and prefer the bigger underfloor storage. Also you want a bench seat on the top trim because you cant get that on the 90. And in terms of price they are the same price now but the 90 will more than likely go up again next year as it’s still a 2024 model year and the 70 is 2025.

[@Ziakel]

@@DeadAir21 we do use 3rd row often in our Pilot and Sienna. Having options to fold is better than not having it. CX-70 is not the best move for Mazda.

[@DeadAir21]

@@Ziakel yeah having the option is great for you but not for everyone. A empty nester isn’t going to care about a 3rd row. A single person who doesn’t want children may not need or be interested in the extra seats. Mazda is giving you options. You want seating and versatility get the 90. You don’t need the seats and you want more covered storage get the 70.

[@rickjames6867]

The CX-70 is sharp. Very nice vehicle. Top choice from the segment.

[@DavidLLambertmobile]

I agree. Im 53 & single. If I needed a new SUV, this 2025 Mazda would be the vehicle I'd check.

[@Terry-p7t]

How is it over city potholes.

[@peterpopphan4191]

I actually love the shifter set up. It makes a ton of sense in multi-point turns and is not so different that you won’t be used to it after the first ride

[@CarsandTechInfo]

I'm 25 & I love this CX-70. I'm a single guy with no kids so I was originally considering the CX-5 Signature, but this new CX-70 Interior is stunning in that red or tan Nappa leather with the Polymetal Gray blue-gray exterior

[@joshsmith4560]

Hope you make a really good living as a 25 year old lol

[@DavidLLambertmobile]

My sister has a 2012 Mazda CX9 vehicle. She likes the CX70 SUV 2025. She works from 🏡 & her son is in college so commutes, gear-bags are not a big deal. 🚙 I like the blue-gray shade. Tan isn't bad.

[@CarsandTechInfo]

@@joshsmith4560 I don't atm so that's why I'm looking at the turbo versions of the CX-5 & 50 instead since they would be less expensive for a lease in South FL.

[@indylawi5021]

great review that is straight, unbiased and yet informative about of this new Mazda CX-70.

[@timw2083]

The CX70 was on the top of my list to replace our GLE... but I was hoping we got a CX60 sized vehicle.

[@alphabeta8403]

Due to its RWD architecture, bet it drives better than any Honda, Toyota or Nissan in its class. Made in Japan should make it ultra reliable too. Well done Mazda!

[@sheldonduffy9442]

Excellent review…it really appears that Mazda has fixed those minor issues that afflicted my CX-90 PHEV.

[@jonathangerm]

Great review! Really Insightful!

[@jasperdilincoln2341]

The CX 60! Come on Mazda 😁

[@JohnCarterFitness]

I had 4 Mazdas and I loved them, and was excited for this one but they lack so many small little details...mood lights would have been an amazing addition to the higher trims, its usually a very dark cabin and that touch enhances the luxury of the product. Great video :)

[@CarsandTechInfo]

The top trims do have ambient lighting if you're referring to that. And there's also foot well lighting too

[@JohnCarterFitness]

@@CarsandTechInfo which ones?

[@RichardDCook]

My Venn Diagram when buying a car is three circles: price, reliability, and gas mileage. There are no circles for frivolous do-dads.

[@ryanfrisby7389]

Great video Lyn!

[@tristantownsend64]

As a 27 year old with no kids this makes me crave the hybrid CX-5/50

[@fatman5377]

I have the cx5, NA 2.5 non hybrid. I’m 6 2 wide build. Overall I love this car, space is a lackluster with a kids seat. But the quality of the car, and I’m beating it up badly (22k annually) it’s a solid car, just make sure to buy it after a lease - you’ll save the bull of the depreciation

[@tristantownsend64]

@@fatman5377 thanks for the info. I am holding out for the hybrid CX5

[@fatman5377]

@@tristantownsend64 that’s going to be a while. Right now they’re talking 25-27 to introduce PHEV, full hybrids according to what i can see are not that good. I’m getting 29.3 on my CX5 on premium and 28.1 on regular fuel.

[@tristantownsend64]

@@fatman5377 the hybrid CX-50 may have to do if they can get the price right

[@fatman5377]

@@tristantownsend64 honestly I would leave the Mazda as is for purists, it’s great engineering, great driving experience I wish they were as big as Hondas

[@bill7481]

I would bet that if Mazda brought the CX-60 that many people are asking for, they would complain that it’s too small, or they would question Mazda’s rationale for doing so since the CX-5 and CX-50 are quite similar in terms of second row space. However, there is no question that Mazda should have done more to differentiate the CX-70 from the CX-90.

[@CuriousGeorge1111]

Informative and fun--nicely done!

[@WOOF95]

I can see this as a Genesis competitor, too.

[@Quinton0520]

Thye shouldve brought the cx60 to the US!!! That is what people wanted.

[@ab348]

The CX-60 is a better, smaller size, but the RWD platform and long nose to accommodate the drivetrain means the cabin gets pushed rearward. The result in the CX-60 is a very tight rear seat that is almost unusable if tall people are up front. Cabin space is very cramped. The architecture of this platform is very compromised because of the RWD configuration which forced the CX-70 and -90 to be oversized and heavy.

[@SSS-mp8th]

Exact same price as the CX-90 so what's the point?

[@wbwayne8887]

Exactly

[@kvetcha]

If you know you're never going to want that third row, you can get some extra under-floor storage. That's basically it, aside from the visual differences.

[@tristantownsend64]

Sportier steering and design. It’s a whole different vibe and audience

[@MohamedShoeb-hz5re]

Looks like Mazda listened to North America complaining about cramped space, now everyone is complaining it's too large

[@wbwayne8887]

@MohamedShoeb-hz5re Too large for a 2 row SUV. Critics always complain about Mazda's 3 row SUV space. Not as much with the CX-90, as they used to with the CX-9 though.

[@HRCfan17]

This is a great option for those of us who will never use a third row and would like the space instead.

[@larryderby4901]

Very nice job giving us lots of information without getting too technical. You didn't mention the different (non PHEV) trim levels and what the upgrades give you and no mention was made about the available sound systems which is important to me.

[@aygeeninty771]

You have a shift logic option to take full manual via paddles. Set it up via favourites button for easy access.

[@desertmodern7638]

The 391 lb-ft torque figure for the lower power six is incorrect; the correct figure is 332 lb-ft.

[@winnaung1238]

That’s right the long wheel base made it look bigger and gorgeous, when driving on the road does not feel that way!

[@45snakebite]

Why Mazda didn't give the CX-70 fog lights? If this is a driver's crossover, the lighting should reflect that. Plus fog lights will coordinate the front end with the rear end.

[@canuckmaun77]

Great review!!

[@CarsandTechInfo]

I wonder if the next generation CX-5 will end up being closer to the midsize two-row CUV people were hoping the CX-70 would be

[@gaius_marius]

By the way, if you wish to remain in manual mode after utilizing the paddle shifters, simply move the gear knob to manual. This will maintain the revs to the maximum extent possible without causing harm to the engine.

[@CarsandTechInfo]

2:07 That torque number doesn't seem right. It's less than 391 since the higher output version has 369 lb-ft of torque

[@regmatt]

the ride is excellent coz it has double wishbone suspension not like other suv which has the mcherson struts..

[@OverlandOrange]

CX-70 is the Goldilocks IMHO.

[@mc.charleymusic]

I think if we get the Mazda CX-60, I think it should be a wagon for the US, and if Mazda was to make a pickup, they should name it the DX-80 just a thought

[@arni7810]

Looks great!! But it needs foglights amd nicer brake lights. I also wish that make it shirts smaller like the cx- 60 or cx- 80 they have in another part of the world....then ill buy it😮😊

[@RickLeduc-t7e]

Beautiful ride but where's the exhaust tips??!!

[@zelcpavle5494]

The Cx-80 thats coming in Europe should be the 70 just with 5 seat The Cx-80 will have 7 seat in Europe but.will be way smaller than the cx90

[@DeadAir21]

Because Europe roads are much smaller than North American roads. The 70 and 90 were made specifically for North America because everyone complained that the CX-9 was too small.

[@jomatexas1479]

Just turned 2k miles on my turbo premium plus. Overall, love the vehicle, but I have a growing list of issues I hope will be addressed: 1. Wireless charging never works, so hopefully a software update will eventually fix. When I place iPhone on it, it opens my apple wallet. Lol, maybe Mazda is looking for more money... 2. Rattles 🤬! Something annoying in console area I can't pin down yet (faint and high pitched), and something in the rear seats (maybe more). I see others with rear seat noise so I'll point that out to dealer. I do notice the rear seats vibrate (left to right) quite a bit when driving so not sure what that's all about? 3. Something not great in powertrain when starting slowly. Like a hesitation between 1st and 2nd gear. Does not do the same in sport mode (but can’t set sport mode as default). Good luck owners - Hope Mazda and dealers transparently address these issues.

[@JamaicanMeCrazy]

Mazda is crazy

[@oscardelarosa8217]

Glad they brought back the CX7 .

[@Terry-p7t]

The reason I'd buy the cx70 is for the long wheelbase and the heavy weight for a reasonable low price,as long as you wont not pay over the cx70 Prefered Trim level.

[@AD-lf9ck]

Mazda, give is cx60 or the european cx80 without 3rd row.

[@SoFreshSoClean2024]

AWD should be standard by LAW on Mid and Large SUV. Especially for Safety and Handling and getting out of Mud, Snow, Ice, and Hydroplanes.

[@jourdantolentino]

Which one is better Cayenne or Xc70

[@Jamal-ub1ko]

2:04 Didn't know the base one made so much more torque!

[@fx3650]

And it still not sound like a tone for her 😂

[@BrandonG8Man]

It doesn’t. It’s a mistake.

[@Hunter-nl2qt]

It was a typo it makes 332 lb-ft according to Mazda’s website.

[@doncalabrese3112]

I like the KBB reviews. I like the Mazdas. Just be away that they leave off some features out that you might expect. We drove the CX90, very nice car but the side mirrors don't move with the memory seat function - does not make sense ! All six of my previous cars with memory seats move the mirrors also. I wondered what else they left off that I didn't ask about.

[@HarryRylee1]

great account. thanks!

[@Thisishard2333]

Everyone I see reviewing the CX90 and the CX70 appears to be on the short side.Im 6 feet 2 inches.I was so disappointed in the legroom in the rear seat for the CX90 that I waited for the CX70.Same thing. I would guess your 5’2”

[@hereigoagain5050]

Nice review. I hope Mazda puts the I6 in a sports sedan.

[@maxaudi2804]

In other words it’s a 3rd row option. This car as its own model makes no sense. Should have made it a little larger than the cx50 but smaller than cx90.

[@shaggywagshaggywag]

Plug-in hybrid range should be much, much better at this point in time! As an owner of 2 EV’s, 26 miles won’t cut it. If you’re in cold climate that number will be reduced, and there’s no mention of regenerative braking, so… With all the available tech, manufacturers must be holding back this offering for a reason. If that number was 75-100 miles of range, I bet you’d see a major increase in hybrid sales.

[@TheJollycoppers]

I like the red interior. Too bad it isn't available in the 90.

[@juancarlosgroman8628]

Why is the CX-70 priced higher than the CX-90 on Mazda's website? Anyone?

[@anthonygianfrancesco6548]

7:25 from then on i was confused

[@anthonyvitelli39]

Skip the PHEV for now. The CX-90 has seen TONS of TSB's and issues with it to this day.

[@riderNdriver]

Atlas crossport is a similar competitor

[@weirdshibainu]

4 cyl

[@thetrainguy1]

I have two kids ... And i don't use the third row in my explorer. So I don't mind it.

[@ericmarrs8944]

I don't understand the confusion about the CX-70 and CX 90 being the same vehicle minus the 3rd row. Isn't that what all the other SUVs that have regular and "L" models are? And ALL of the reviewers got stuck on it. I'm in the "older " group she mentions that doesn't need the 3rd row. And I understand doing much more than removing the seats will cost the carmaker more. It just makes sense.

[@asymmetry9988]

The CX70 is basically the CX90 minus the 3rd row

[@peter27241]

Look so good but a little bit more fog light better

[@JarmelSingsKaraoke]

☕☕☕ Happy Tuesday

[@chadpurser]

I really like this overall package, but I'm not a fan of the fake air intakes/dams in the front.

[@sandroscielzo9964]

I thought the same thing, then found out that the sides of those fake grills are actually functional air dams... but yeah, looks-wise not the best

[@anirudhgadhavi41]

Not a fair comparison, instead of Honda passport this completes with Acura RDX.

[@bahrahme]

cx70 = cx90 - 3rd row.

[@Terry-p7t]

The ligher steering is an improvement over the CX90 Should have a torque converter transmission for smoother low speed operation.

[@purchasefromapro2956]

You can set paddle shifters to stay engaged… So you misspoke

[@dannydevito5729]

She literally showed that option

[@nvgwd3r]

You made a mistake with the torque, how is the turbo producing less torque than naturally aspirated

[@squalie9]

Should have done a interior review and left it at that.

[@LiohJuney]

Yeah that torque number is way off on the base model engine.

[@dawsongranger4940]

Still don’t understand why this vehicle exists

[@ab348]

What a fluff piece of a review. According to Lyn, everything is sunshine and rainbows, but aside from mention of a little jerkiness with the transmission, which is a chronic problem for the CX-70 and -90 and which has had numerous software fixes attempted, nothing was mentioned about the stiff ride, the heavy steering, and she even attempted to gloss over the bizarre infotainment system. Add to that an endless list of recalls, numerous buyer issues with flaky systems and features simply not working, and very odd configurations and pricing, and one can understand why these are stacking up on dealer lots. There are already numerous lemon law buybacks being reported on brand forums. A bit more transparency would be helpful.

[@krefcenz]

Probably don’t mention the phrase price point before you mention the price. Just some constructive criticism.

[@TheHersonCastillo]

One can wish and dream ☺

[@The_Notorious_CRG]

It's a new era for KBB...no Muzio-music vibe.

[@ascott2168]

Micah is awesome tho !

[@dforrest4503]

You not only made the mistake about torque figures on the base model, but your cargo capacity figures on the Honda Passport are completely wrong. With its rear seats down, the Passport has 77 cubic feet of cargo. How does a car review channel get those things wrong?

[@purchasefromapro2956]

Also doesn’t understand paddle shiftters

[@DavidLLambertmobile]

I'm confused! 🤔 Mazda took out a row of seats 💺. It's not that complex.

[@aristonaquino175]

I love mazdas

[@ruiqiliu5399]

CX110 should have 4 row seats then

[@dachta1]

This model cx-70 doesn't make sense at all when you have cx-90

[@jerbsherb4391]

Mazda trying to continue pushing their cars as luxury is so sad. Mazda, you either have to start a luxury brand or keep your vehicles aligned with the rest of the market. I am not going to cross shop a Mazda if I'm planning to buy a BMW.

[@DWK33]

Couldn’t disagree more. They do lixury by their trim lines. So if you want more base, mainstream, go to a lower trim and now the Mazda is much better than a Chevy, with negligible price difference. Go to a signature or upper trim and you are competing with luxury cars at a much lower price point. The whole point of the brand is to play in the space between.

[@OldRustySteele]

I want a BMW which is reliable. Therefore, I’ll buy a high end Mazda. Part of “luxury” to me is not having to take my vehicle back to the dealer all the time. I have other things to do in my life other than sit in the fancy schmancy dealer sipping a latte while wasting my time waiting for an overengineered car to be fixed. (Sadly, while the German high end cars are notorious for this, the Japanese cars are getting this way as well. Thank you EPA for your overreach).

[@gummiesrule88]

The down-rated 3.3 Turbo in this car does NOT deliver 391 lb. ft of torque, as you claim. Even the uprated 3.3 delivers "only" 369 lb.ft.

[@sheldonduffy9442]

Makes sense having a different nomenclature for the CX-70. I cross shopped the Genesis GV80, and it was confusing trying to identify one that had the 3d row. This way, there are no issues with that. Also, the CX-70 is definitely more sporty looking.

[@1aarimont]

All other automatics go thru reverse before park

[@kencoleman8929]

I am! ✨️✨️✨️

[@classicboy97]

Mazda needs more fuel-efficient vehicles

[@sheldonduffy9442]

The CX-70 is already among the top in class for any CUV the equivalent size. The PHEV is even more efficient.

[@chefboyartty]

Agreed, if this had the Highlander Hybrid engine..... it would be such a hit!

[@TYPICALTRYHARD_]

This car is definitely not made for efficiency go buy a Prius

[@chefboyartty]

Right but it is in the same size class as a Highlander, which has a hybrid. So ppl would buy a highlander not a prius.....

[@curiosityredpill7030]

In-line 6 vs small turbo 4 cylinder for those big vehicles

[@nathanhashman5895]

Mazda is out of touch with the market. Tested a CX-50 and it was so disappointing. Uncomfortable seats, hard on premium gas and very tight on interior space. Ended up buying a new CRV Hybrid. Another big miss here.

[@fatman5377]

Let’s agree to disagree. It’s a matter of personal preference, the Mazda is aiming at an entirely different market.

[@MohamedShoeb-hz5re]

Mazda CX 50 has now a Toyota hybrid system with Toyota eCVT. Seat comfort is bad but it's Mazda's horse rider philosophy, potentially functional in terms of safety

[@pummppkinn]

I love my CX-50, but this car just doesn't make any sense...

[@fuelmj]

Base engine gets 332 lb ft of torque not 391

[@blackwhirlwind1245]

I thought it’s 280, plug in 323, turbo s 340.

[@hisownfool1]

It’s a nice vehicle, but like most of its competitors it’s a glorified minivan. At least 80% of the time it will be put to the same use as the Mazda MPV. in that case, why do you need a six cylinder engine? Why do you need to pay more than $50,000? I agree the cars are way too expensive, but some of the problem is that we convince ourselves to overlook the absurdity of the market