3 Reasons Why You SHOULDN'T Buy the Canon R6 Mark II! 📸😳

Here are 3 Reason's why you shouldn't buy the Canon EOS R6 Mark II. It would have been 5 but it was hard to think of 5! 3 was a stretch! But this camera is not perfect and defiantly not for everyone. Comment below if these reasons are enough for you not to buy the camera or if you don't care and will buy it anyway! The Canon R6 Mark II is such an amazing camera and if you want to see 5 reasons why you should buy the R6 MK II then watch this video below.
• 5 Reasons Why You NEED...
To get amazing royalty free music, SFX, Stock footage, templates and more use the links below to get FREE 2 months of Artlist and $50 off Motion Array!
⚡️2 FREE MONTHS OF ARTLIST🔥 rb.gy/z0fzf7
⚡️2 FREE MONTHS FOR ARTGRID🔥 rb.gy/68jtxh
⚡️$50 OFF ANNUAL MOTION ARRAY SUBSCRIPION!🔥 rb.gy/7s0k8y
⚡️ARTLIST ENTERPRISE 🔥 rb.gy/v249v7
Thank you for watching! Don't forget to hit subscribe!
All my Gear!
EOS R: amzn.to/3GKeQnD
R6 Mark II: amzn.to/3Jbahq0
My favourite lens 70-200mm F/2.8: amzn.to/3In9WNQ
My workhorse lens EF 16-35 F/4: amzn.to/38Tcirs
My go to video lens RF35mm: amzn.to/3qGOQUj
The Lens everyone NEEDS! RF 50mm amzn.to/3P8YtW4
My everyday travel lens RF24-105: amzn.to/3nIVZSf
Amaran 100D: amzn.to/3G020lO
The GAME changing laptop I use: amzn.to/3Ktiqor
Logitech MX Master keys mini: amzn.to/3jCuHxy
Logitech MX Master 2S Mouse: amzn.to/3Gy6MIY
The magical drone I use DJI Mini 2:amzn.to/33sVOnp
The best camera monitor under £200! FeelWorld F6 Plus: amzn.to/3I2eM45
Mantispod 2.0 Mini tripod:amzn.to/3hVyZQp
GoPro Hero 10! amzn.to/3AgNpiT
THE BEST GOPRO ACCESSORY MAGNETIC MOUNT: amzn.to/3FCHplu
Canon EOS R Battery grip: amzn.to/3qNqetn
The gimbal I use DJI RSC2: amzn.to/3rzihHm
My Everyday backpack! Lowepro paratactic 450 II :amzn.to/3fIuoMx
Budget Camera bag! Lowepro Tahoe BP150 : amzn.to/3j1F8qX
My studio mic RODE NT-USB: amzn.to/3GM32ky
My vlog mic Rode video mic go : amzn.to/3GIW3c8
The Studio light I use, Godox : amzn.to/357G0XB
The tripod I use: amzn.to/3nGEGRQ
Amazon basics tripod: amzn.to/3fLPlpP
My ND filter: amzn.to/3AcZYvw
Budget RGB lights I use: amzn.to/3GZEkgZ
The BEST RGB light for everything, Aputure MC : amzn.to/3KoYItU
Aputure MC 4 pack: amzn.to/3KK1PwG
JJC Hand strap: amzn.to/3qN6wgX
Canon EOS R ND Adapter: amzn.to/36Ncck1
Canon EOS R Basic adapter: amzn.to/3LA1r3v
Canon EOS R Control ring adapter: amzn.to/3wRt6IY
Canon EOS R Polarising adapter: amzn.to/3NzxF0z
Neewer 5 in 1 reflector amzn.to/3w8Rxj8
K and F Concept magnetic filter kit! amzn.to/38vaGE6
K and F concept magnetic pro mist filter 77mm! amzn.to/3z8auFU
I am an amazon affiliate partner and may get compensation if you click on any of these links.
#canon #canoncamera #photography

[@stubones]

A few years ago 21mp was considered plenty for pretty much everything. Now suddenly we're so entitled and so consumed with numbers that 24mp isn't "enough"... We need to gain some perspective.

[@samuelmaynard84]

I've never said it's not enough, it's probably the perfect amount. If more megapixels are available then landscape photographers will probably want that which is why i made that point

[@samuelmaynard84]

I've never said it's not enough, it's probably the perfect amount. If more megapixels are available then landscape photographers will probably want that which is why i made that point

[@livestreamsuk6004]

Absolutely apparently human eyesight has improved. Photography was never about resolution and image quality meant how good your composition was. 1ds mk3 was a very legendary professional camera at 21 mpx

[@fishfighter2]

​@@livestreamsuk6004funny thing is I have a R6 Mark II, but I still use my 1D Mark III from time to time at a whopping 12 megapixels. Pictures look the same and just as good as when I bought the camera used back in 2012.

[@OhhhhhhhBugger]

You don't do wildlife obviously.....

[@paullanoue5228]

Large prints can be printed at a lower dpi. Because the viewer looks at a 24x36 inch print from 7 or 8ft. away. The eye can’t distinguish tiny details at that distance. I have a number of large prints in my home. No one ever looks at them from six inches away but photographers. Some were shot years ago with 20 megapixel cameras. No one has ever said to me, “If only it were a 100 megapixels.”

[@77dris]

Great video Samuel. I too think the R6 Mark II is the best camera I've ever used and I have 18 years of experience using Canon's best including their 1D cameras. Before I bought the R6 Mark II I did research to determine if resolution mattered. James Reader did a great comparison of the R6 (original), R, and R5 and shot with the best Canon RF lenses for both portraits and landscape. I downloaded his raw files, the Enhanced the R6 files in Adobe Camera Raw and output the raw file to 45 MP. When overlayed with the 45 MP R5 files, the Enhanced R6 files were sharper and more detailed! That's when I decided that I didn't need 45 MP from the R5 and got the newly announced R6 Mark II! Any size I can print (or crop) on the R5, I can do so with the R6 Mark II as well. Focus accuracy will actually make a bigger difference than the MP count and the R6 Mark II's AF system is actually better than the R5. For video one thing you mention is the lack of Clog2. However, what I am more surprised by is the lack of Clog1!!! I don't think even the R3 has it (just Clog3). Sure Clog3 has some advantages like greater dynamic range, however Clog1 has the advantage of being much cleaner in the shadows and being native at ISO400. Clog1 is actually much better for low light situations than Clog3. I really wish they'd add it back to the R6 lineup. Other than that the only other thing I really miss would be 4K 120. I do most of my shooting in 4K 60 though and the R6 II has the best 4K 60 in the business (aside from maybe the R3 which I suspect is similar).

[@samuelmaynard84]

Thanks man glad you liked it! It's such an amazing camera! Yeah the MP count don't bother me at all and really! That's cool I didn't know about that! Also yeah surprised there's no Clog 1. I may just have to have more lights so it performs better in the shadows. I would love 4K 100fps but I'm more than happy with 1080p 150 fps! So happy with this camera I've photographed 4 weddings now with it and it's a joke how good it is

[@77dris]

@@samuelmaynard84 Great! With the Upscale feature of Resolve (if you use it) it upscales 1080 to 4K really well so those 120/150/180 clips can be useful.

[@Yupthereitism]

This guy is a psychopath

[@gerardogomezlopez6380]

comienzo a tomar fotos y me regalaron en navidad esta camara , no se nada de fotografia , no tengo cursos ni nada por el estilo , alguien me comento que era una super camara , ¿ digame que puedo hacer ? Que tipo de fotografia es preferible realizar , paisajes , personas , plantas ,.... Ocupo consejos

[@tonylovephotography]

For the audio part for Canon r6ii canon does have xlr components that can be put into the hot shoe ...that's made by Tascam Canon Kit XLR Microphone Adapter for Mirrorless Cameras, Black (CA-XLR2dC) Tascam Canon Kit XLR Microphone Adapter for Mirrorless Cameras, Black (CA-XLR2dC)

[@samuelmaynard84]

Yeah you are right, it is quite expensive though isn't it? I'm pretty sure you can get an XLR-Mic jack port as well haha

[@tonykeltsflorida]

I have the M6 mark II. I am happy with it.

[@samuelmaynard84]

So am I! Absolutely love my R6 II! How long have you had yours for?

[@tonykeltsflorida]

@@samuelmaynard84 I got my M6 mark II a couple years ago. I got it from MPB . I can't get an R series camera. They are too expensive.

[@jotapardophoto]

Summary: Three reasons against buying the Canon R6 Mark II include its 24.2-megapixel sensor, which may not satisfy high-detail needs for landscape or product photography; limitations in video capabilities, lacking the All-I codec and 4K 120fps; and inadequate audio performance without XLR ports, making it less suitable for top professionals. Here are three reasons against buying the Canon R6 Mark II: Sensor Resolution: The R6 Mark II features a 24.2-megapixel sensor, which may not provide enough detail for users focused on high-resolution work, such as landscape or product photography that benefits from larger resolutions. Video Limitations: While it supports impressive video features, it lacks advanced options like the All-I codec or 4K recording at 120fps, which may limit its appeal for serious videographers who require these capabilities. Audio Performance: The camera does not come with XLR ports for professional audio input, making its audio capabilities less robust for high-end video production where superior sound quality is essential.

[@sagardaniphotos]

To my experience, clients don't understand difference between All-I and IPB. Even for weddings, IPB is sufficient. Clients are happy when you offer 4K. It is us, photographers, who think about the superiority of All-I over IPB. To the clients, capturing right moment at their wedding in 4K makes them happy :) Only if you're a serious filmmaker who aims to be on Netflix one day, you need ALL-I in CLOG 2 but the you will hire a cine camera, right?

[@samuelmaynard84]

Yeah mate you are right, really high quality production companies like the company I work for will need a cinema camera, not really an R6 II. It's really to show how good this camera is really that only top top professionals need more than what this camera offered ( for video this is)

[@evansalmonsen]

You can also shoot 6k raw with the the atmos , not that you’d ever need to do that for a wedding but it’s there

[@evansalmonsen]

I was photographing a wedding a few weeks ago and talked to the videographer there , he shoots 2-3 weddings every single weekend and doesn’t even shoot in log. He shoots on an r6 (the first one) and just canon colors and the clients don’t even realize or care. Dude doesn’t even use ND filters and is shooting over 100 weddings a year. Moral of the story the clients just care if the video looks decent and that’s all

[@sagardaniphotos]

@@evansalmonsen Absolutely agree with that wedding photographer. I have shot wedding videos on standard colour profile and the video looks beautiful when right moments are captured. Clients are happy :)

[@assiaax2769]

what camera would you suggest for getting into wedding photography?

[@faisalferoz9563]

Well. I was using 5d miv and switched to r6 mii. I have been using it for wildlife photography almost 3 months ago with sigma 150-600mm lense. I didn't face any problem till now. Its a great camera for me.

[@samuelmaynard84]

Nice man it's an amazing camera!!

[@gregscott2330]

I took picture of a big horn sheep and accidentally shot it in 1.6 crop mode which renders the image at 11 megapixels on my eos r and it turned out to be one of my best images of my trip to the Badlands.

[@samuelmaynard84]

Nice one mate!! Just goes to show it doesn't matter what gear you have and what specs, it's about the final photo and the story it tells. That sounds amazing! Haha

[@able1039]

Most companies I work for don’t want LOG footage. All these specs don’t matter. I shoot with an R5 but I know someone who books twice as many weddings with a bunch of EOS R’s shooting in 1080p.

[@samuelmaynard84]

Log is just better to work with, if you plan on colour correcting and grading in post. So it shouldn't matter if companies don't want log because they should leave it to the professionals to do the work. ( if you are talking about clients that is) and if your a good marketer and communicator, you can book weddings using a phone, I saw it a few weeks ago. It all comes down to that really

[@samuelmaynard84]

It's something I definitely need to improve on

[@nadim341]

You obviously missed a few points here... the mic problem and missing XLR connectors you've mentioned aren't a problem at all... The R6 MkII has a 21 pin digital hot shoe on top for the exact same reason. There's external mics built exactly for this reason, automatically syncing with the video. Plus you didn't mention that it has full 6K ProRes RAW output via HDMI, making it possible to shoot way better video quality than All-I with an external recorder such as Atomos Ninja. It doesn't have everything built-in, that's right. But Canon left everything accessible with this camera. I love mine a lot.

[@samuelmaynard84]

I never said it's a problem, you can easily use high quality mics with this camera, just not mics with XLR ports unless you use a XLR - Jack cable, which isn't ideal. So you'll be better off buying a cinema camera to get the better audio. I didn't mention that because you need to buy the Ninja atomos. An extra cost and quite a heavy cost as well. The camera can't shoot that on its own which is why I didn't mention it. Of course you can get the cable and use XLR mics, get a ninja to get 6K Raw which is why it's great that the option is there. I love mine so much it's such an amazing camera

[@utopian666]

The 6k raw is a downgrade on the R6II. It's worse than the prores.

[@nadim341]

@@utopian666 from what i know it’s not. You just have to make sure to send and receive BT2020 instead of Rec709 to avoid the strange yellow color shift.

[@77dris]

All-I isn't even necessary. I shoot IPB Light exclusively and the quality is pretty much exactly the same as ALL-I when I've compared to other cams. In fact, the IPB on the R6 II is higher bitrate than the ALL-I on the EOS R I believe.

[@PossMcLeod]

It's also great as a 2nd camera for professionals. I currently run an R5 as my main, and an old 5DM4. Seriously considering buying the R6 to replace the 5D. Great vid, very useful in confirming I'm making the right call i think ;)

[@filmowaniezprofitem]

Can You see any diference between IPB Light and ALL-I? Personally I don't.

[@samuelmaynard84]

I've not really done a side by side comparison but not really. Maybe there's a bit more noise and compression but to the average eye no one will tell a difference

[@Yurrtoby]

Honestly i do mainly sports and event photography so even though this video seems geared towards everyone BUT me, they way you explain things and your level of activity in comments is great. New sub 👍

[@jeffwilliams7669]

Human Eye can see upwards of 576 megapixels. Higher for people with Perfect Eyesight. Anything under that, the Human Eye would be able to to discern the minute details of any image.

[@kingbillybob]

I rented the Canon R6 Mk II to try before buying. I only shoot photos, no video, so I can say for photos it was impressive. I also rented a RF 100-400mm lens that worked well on up close bird photos. It tracked the eyeballs of the birds, and gave some amazing shots that were pin sharp. I do however track customer reviews apart from listening to KZbin reviews, and I found that concerning. I picked several places to read those, but the main one was B&H Photo, since they sell a lot of equipment. There seems to be way too many people having issues with the R6, R6 MK II, and the R5 mirrorless cameras malfunctioning, over heating, with features that quit working. You should check them out for yourself, because it sounds like the quality control isn't there with the newer product. I believe I am going to wait a while and see how things play out before I spend the money. I have a lot of expensive EF glass that worked fine with the the adapter I also rented to try out, so I am kind of stuck with Canon. I can take great pictures with their tried and true DSLR's for now.

[@samuelmaynard84]

I don't think you have anything to worry about with performance from this camera, especially with taking photos. It won't overheat unless maybe it's a super hot day and your spamming 40fps all day potentially. I've had no problems at all so far, i've not shot that much video but that's been fine as well. The R6 on the other hand will overheat for video and i think the R5 has gotten better. You'll be fine I think, unless you live in a super hot country then i'm unsure on that.

[@kingbillybob]

@@samuelmaynard84 The more I dig, the more I find out. Because there is so much information on line, the first 7 months of this year have been very informative. I have shot pictures all of my life, and I go way back into the 35mm film era. I have only started paying attention to the camera market since maybe the last year. I decided to purchase a 90D, which I considered to be enough, and it is a good camera. What I didn't know about Canon, or most other brands was their ASP-C lens suck, especially on a 90D. After struggling with that I purchased some L glass at a very high price, and now I get way better shots. In my opinion, I should have known that up front, but most of the people on KZbin weren't discussing that, they only tried to hype it up as the best camera ever right out of the box. I am on a 90D Facebook page, and 80% of the people there were very upset about that, because half of their shots were blurred and out of focus with the kit lens, which at the time the EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS NANO USM was a $600 lens. Most of those people can't afford L glass. That is why I am going to wait until enough people prove a camera after using it extensively. From what I am hearing, most camera channels on KZbin are afraid to discuss the negatives, but people that purchase the cameras are not. Facebook pages for different camera bodies are one of the best places to hear the failures of different models and brands. Not KZbin.

[@jremi]

Well, two of the reasons are aimed at video shooting which I have little interest in...As far as landscape photography is concerned, there is a workaround if you absolutely need more megapixels. You can make panoramas by taking multiple shots of a scene and stich them together in post processing. Then you can even go bigger than what the R5 allows. Obviously, if you are a pro, you probably know all of that already. I appreciated the video nonetheless. It confirmed that the R6 Mark II is perfect for my needs.

[@docprince]

Do you suggest it for a KZbin studio? I create talking head videos like you and I am thinking about buying it.

[@samuelmaynard84]

I do suggest it yes but only if your going to use it for photography and videography jobs as well. If not you'll be better off getting a cheaper camera in my opinion

[@ishanagarwalphotography]

is that DJI RS2 you are using along R6ii ? is it compatible stop start video button I have a 5dmarkiii and canon 60D I will be changing my 60D to a 10bit mirrorless

[@samuelmaynard84]

It's the DJI RSC2 and yeah you can but you need to connect it via wire and then you have that feature. The new Rs3 is Bluetooth and you can do it that way

[@VespertiliKildem]

The mark 2 does NOT have all-i? What the heck, even my 10 years old 6D has all-I. Well that's enough reason NOT to buy it. This video was useful.

[@francescotenutafilms]

I remind you that in the cinema they used a 5D mk II for some films (127 hours, Iron Man 2, Black Swan) and it didn't have the capabilities of an R6 MK II in the slightest. Films are made by ideas and people, the rest is all mental bullshit.

[@lino4thmr1985]

I just love all the shots of Black Swan

[@gelidgenteel]

whats your thoughts on Mark II vs original R6 for super lowlight video recording? was wanting to do some night work with recording star movement, but also motion tracking with mapping to 3D rigging for animation in dim to lowlight at higher FPS (non 4K is acceptable in this case, fps would be priority) oh also a lot of water stuff, recording fish movement in how they move tail, fins, etc but idk if thats applicable. maybe for the fast shutter speeds edit: if the cinema series is one youd actually recommend over the R6 MkII, which of of that series would you prefer for the super low lighting environments i mentioned previously?

[@samuelmaynard84]

I've personally never used the canon R6 but it is quite similar. Both are amazing in low light because of the low megapixels but I have noticed it doesn't have the best shadow performance as it can get very noisy sometimes. I think that's a fault in CLOG 3 in my opinion. For the cinema line your best bet would probably be the Canon R5C because it is full frame but it's restricted to clog 3 again. The Canon C70 i think is the best bet, it's super 35 sensor and not full frame but it records at a duel gain output which is amazing for dynamic range and it shoots in clog 2. It's an absolute beast and the image is lush. The C70 may be overkill tho unless your earning money from video work or if you just have money to spend! Haha! I think the R6 Mark II is a great choice because it can also do unreal photos and it has some amazing video features, plus it's a lot cheaper than the other 2. The R6II Also has 150 fps in 1080p which is brilliant! I hope this helps!

[@gelidgenteel]

@@samuelmaynard84 ill have to look to look into the C70 then, see how good it performs at recording in super dark environments, thanks for the info! ill check out the R5C as well

[@samuelmaynard84]

No problem man hopefully you find the camera your looking for!

[@gelidgenteel]

@@samuelmaynard84 gotta say, youre the friendliest channel ive seen so far lol; didnt expect help at all. thanks a ton, ill definitely be using your videos to learn from now on

[@samuelmaynard84]

Thanks so much man that's so much appreciated! :) super nice to hear glad your enjoying the channel and I'm always happy to help! :)

[@dubemfotografia]

Irmão blz ? A estabilização da r6m2 você vê direnca ao usar uma lente nativa RF ? Já usou a 16mm RF, ?

[@truthseeker6804]

i couldve gone for r5 but i went with this due to unlimited recording and less overheating issue, although r5 overheating is improved. now after some weeks im considering if the extra megapixel wouldve been good and the 4k 120p although ive never really needed 4k 120p. and i am not really a photographer. so overall im happy with this. but i wouldve benefited from the better screen and viewfinder of the r5. anyway maybe i would get the r5 later.

[@77dris]

You know I was dismayed that the LCD on the R6 II was smaller than the R5. However, I spent a good half hour in store using both the R6 II and R5 and couldn't see any difference in EVF or even really in the LCD.

[@truthseeker6804]

@@77dris interesting because I've heard otherwise. Anyway. I'm keeping what I've got. Thanks for your opinion.

[@samuelmaynard84]

I'm happy with my purchase too! And also I didn't realise the screen and viewfinder was different. However it may not be that big considering what DRIS said. I don't need 4K 120 which is why I'm happy with R6 II and like you said with unlimited recording and not much overheating at a cheaper price seemed like a no brainer for me!

[@letsrolloutnyc]

Maybe you should title it in a different way. Instead you should title who is the R6 Mark II for. You made it seem like it was a bad camera.

[@samuelmaynard84]

Sorry mate but these are reasons why you shouldn't buy it but it was so hard to find some reasons!

[@melaniemaynard-gz6wu]

Thanks

[@samuelmaynard84]

Thanks so much for the support! Glad the video helped! :)

[@mjudkins1371]

I had the Canon r6 mark 1 for 2 years and I love it now I'm buying the R6 Mark 2. 😂😂

[@jiridvorak]

you seem very nervous. And please adjust volume when using background music, it almost whole time is louder than your talk (using headphones)

[@ronaldmmiller]

Agree! I have enjoyed this camera and one of the few cameras I have bought that didn’t give me instant buyers regret. Great video, thanks!

[@samuelmaynard84]

Thanks man! Glad you enjoyed the video! I love my R6 II, it's making me want to replace my EOS R with another one!🤣

[@cordelldejager]

I’m actually shocked it doesn’t have All-I.. even the EOS R has All-I doesn’t this have to do with the wrong settings??

[@samuelmaynard84]

I know man it's a little annoying but not the worst in the world. Still a solid video camera!

[@coppensbram]

Nice one, Samuel! I also love my R6 II 😀 You've got 985 subs now 😉

[@samuelmaynard84]

Thanks so much man! Appreciated! The R6 II is phenomenal glad you love yours! What do you use yours for? Photography? Videography? Or both!

[@coppensbram]

@@samuelmaynard84 I'm at about 70% video and 30% photography. And of course: KZbin (I'm about 120 subs behind you on the grind to 1000 😂) Absolutely brilliant hybrid camera!

[@stevenevosando8840]

lol I’m about to make a video title 7 reasons why you should buy the r6 markii 😆

[@samuelmaynard84]

Hey man that's good! I have a 5 reasons to buy it and I could easily have put in more!

[@BOLANGTHANG]

R7 or R5. R6 is right in the middle: much lessrolling shutter than the r7, but not enough megapixels like r5 or r7 for wildlife photography. Better than r7 in high ISO. If you don't shoot in low light and don't care about rolling shutter when using electronic shuttle, take r7.

[@samuelmaynard84]

I understand for wildlife photographers because of the extra reach and megapixels but for the majority of other photography and videography the R6 II is the camera to go for

[@wildlifesimon]

I have been on the fence between r7 and r6ii for wildlife/birding photography. Like you say, rolling shutter, bad buffer and lack of fps options with the ES put me off the r7, but the r6ii doesn't have the reach due to being full frame and not crop like the r7 nor the 30+ mp. Which would you choose for wildlife paired with a rf100-500? Do you think the reach just wouldn't be there on am r6ii?

[@BOLANGTHANG]

@@wildlifesimon for wildlife, if you cannot get the r5, the r7 is the one you get to pair with 100-500mm in daylight. R6ii/r6 is super good in low light, if you ISOs are usually higher than 6400, the r6ii/r5 is the one you get.

[@sunehodal]

the background music is so annoying. This is a big problem for people with poor hearing.

[@samuelmaynard84]

Sorry man I'll turn it down next time

[@alfredknodler540]

A really down-to-earth video about my beloved R6ii. I use it for add-on-shots when I go out with the camera-team for my tv-work but I really miss the XF-AVC-codec. Anyway this codec on the R5C is 810mbs and that's too much data. The C70 is has it with 410mbs but it a bit huge. Maybe the R5ii might solve the problem but I am afraid it won't have All-i at all.

[@samuelmaynard84]

I love my R6II man it's unbelievable. Nice one man sounds good!! I can't wait for the R5 II definitely will be the camera to replace my EOS R to pair with the R6II. Going on the R6 II it might not have all I but with the price point I recon it'll have it

[@michalforysiak9219]

This video is nonsense with the clickbait title. There is no camera on the market for all purposes. All you arguments werent your own, you didnt compare the r5 and r6 printout, you didnt compare all-i and compressed video files by yourself. You are saying dont buy it and praise the camera few secs later. I want my 8 mins back.

[@janscott602]

It boils down to price and destination. If it’s for KZbin the R6 ii is fine.

[@frostgodx]

Ibis wobble deal breaker for KZbin

[@MavicAir2TW]

Thanks for sharing! I prefer R7 for wildlife photography.

[@samuelmaynard84]

No problem man! Yeah true I probably should have mentioned crop sensors are more handy for wildlife and sports because of the extra reach!

[@menangjamir]

ALL-i codec should be a simple basic firmware update. IPB codec is just a HOG for the CPU esp. for PC users like me. Why don't canon Listen to their customer. I bought the R6 Mark II on launch day and I was extremely excited but no so much now after almost a year. Me too I won't recommend this to anyone. I regret buying R6 Mark II. Canon r u LISTENING. WTF

[@samuelmaynard84]

I still recommend it, I love this camera and I personally think IPB is fine for most scenarios, plus the reduced file size is nice

[@livestreamsuk6004]

None of this is true it’s completely contradictory. A pro would be recording audio separately your talking about enthusiasts

[@bornufree]

Our affable reviewer is asking miracles of Canon at this price point! I bet you wildlife and sports photographers will be happy campers Let’s give Canon a break here. This is a lot of camera for the price If you want the perfect camera you need to reach deeper into your pockets

[@samuelmaynard84]

I'm not asking for any of this to be in this camera, I say it's perfect for the price and perfect for so many people but if you do want them extra features then you'll have to pay more money and get an R5 or cinema camera. This is easily one of Canons best cameras by far

[@jpdodel]

Click bait title

[@sweden01ful]

if you wanna take perfect landscape photo buy Hasselblad 10000 dollars, I shot many landscape with this camera and all looks good

[@Burritosarebetterthantacos]

If you shoot in studio stay away…cant be tethered.

[@samuelmaynard84]

Really? Never tried it so didn't realise this

[@bunkerlordi4192]

Really?

[@Burritosarebetterthantacos]

@@bunkerlordi4192 yeah pretty snnoying

[@The_Idea_of_Dream_Vision]

Not convinced.

[@MrTeam302]

It doesn’t shoot all I 😳😳😳😳😳

[@samuelmaynard84]

No only IPB unfortunately and I'm not sure why

[@williebravousa]

A 24mp camera at that price in 2023 is a joke. I want to know what percentage of photographers use EF lenses with an adapter and not the native RF ones, that is a disadvantage in image quality. From what I see you use an adapter and cannot give a reliable verdict.

[@samuelmaynard84]

A 24mp camera is amazing, you get so much for your money and it's not all about megapixels, Some Sony's have 12mp and cost more money. There is no disadvantage in image quality at all so i can make a reliable verdict because I use it in the real world all the time, plus the majority of people who will buy one will most likely adapt EF lenses to save money, which is the smart thing to do.