30 days with the Canon R5 Mark II

[@tmillot]

One of the best and most beautiful review on this camera yet, well done!

[@JamesReader]

Wow - thank you so much!

[@zenscape]

I traded my R5 for the R5 II due to the improved autofocus, and I'm very satisfied with my choice. The criticisms about the R5 II's dynamic range and low-light performance are largely exaggerated. Thank you for the review.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you for watching! Totally agree

[@robbie154]

@@zenscape while the dynamic range may be “less” it’s actually better. As James mentioned the recovery of shadows actually look better, more saturated and detailed. Manny Ortiz also highlighted this.

[@Matt-Holdren]

I had both R5 and the mk2 for about a month. Used the Mk2 as primary and the R5 as a second body during that time. I love my Mk2, main benefits for me is pre capture and E shutter speed > 1/8000 and 8k60 for slo mo wild life shots. I love the MK2 and just sold the R5 body after I was sure I was happy with it.

[@adude394]

Great stuff here! After staying in DSLR-land for a couple of decades, I finally added an R6 Mk II to my bag earlier this year. I liked it so much that I finally sold my beloved 7D Mk II and Sigma 150-600 Sport, and have put that payment towards the purchase of an R5 Mk II, which I hope to get within the next couple of weeks. Really, really looking forward to it. Thanks for posting!

[@ABP982]

Phew!!! Thanks James. So glad to hear you have no regrets and that there seems to be little or no downsides compared to the original R5. I received my R5 Mark II only yesterday (along with a RF 50 f1.2 and RF 14-35). I’m still in the process of setting it up and getting used to the move from my trusty 5DIV to mirrorless. I debated long and hard about whether to go for the R5 MkII over the original R5 - mainly because of the (I suspect exaggerated) claims about poorer dynamic range etc., and whether this percevied ‘trade-off’ was worth it for the AF improvements (which was my primary reason for finally moving to mirrorless). So far though, I couldn’t be happier. It’s quite a step-up from the 5DIV! Some magnificent 'holiday snaps’ right there. Loving the edits and colour grading.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you so much for watching! That's an amazing setup that you have upgraded to. I think you'll be very happy with the R5 II. That 50 1.2 is probably my favourite lens ever too. If you need any help/advice setting it up I'll be happy to help.

[@ABP982]

@@JamesReader Many thanks James. Appreciate it. I'm trying a few back button focus options at present, which I think will work. My plan is to get comfortable with these first, and then integrate a form of eye control AF; maybe as a third back button focus, or I think there's a option to use the 'Moving AF pt, start AF by eye control' on the back button that I have currently assigned to 'Metering and AF start'. I believe it would behave the same as the regular ''Metering and AF start' assignment if eye control is switched off (I'll toggle eye control off/on via another button, such as 'M-fn'). How have you integrated your eye control?

[@evertonwood3310]

The Clog2 footage is insane

[@JamesReader]

Yeah it's soo nice to grade.

[@whiterock1865]

Great Video thank you. What I love about the R5 Mark II is being able to use electronic shutter pretty much 100% of the time.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you for watchin! Yeah the improved electronic shutter performance is amazing

[@electric_keys]

Hi James - Just wanted to say I'm glad I found your channel. Really enjoy your style. Keep doing what you're doing.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you so much!

[@steveglennan]

I'll be picking up the R52 soon. I always like to wait a while on new releases to see what bugs need to be worked out before I buy the camera. Thank you for an Informative review!

[@JamesReader]

Thank you for watching Steve!

[@shawnlabranche6852]

Always a great job on your reviews. I can always watch your videos. Can't wait to see what you have to say about the rf 28-70 f 2.8 when you can get your hands on it.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you so much Shawn! Can’t wait to test out the 28-70

[@DanYosua]

Eye tracking seems like a big win for those who it works for. Great shots as always!

[@JamesReader]

Thank you Dan!

[@danielgonzalezguzman8864]

the video all of us we´re waiting for, lets goooo

[@JamesReader]

Thank you Daniel!!

[@PhilippeDHooghe]

James, happy to see you are still alive and traveling 😅. Thank you for this great review. Brutally honest, easy to access, very very useful. You have a way of reviewing things as no one else does, I really like it. I've seen many R5 II reviews by now and they all seem more or less similar, yours stands out adding the experience over the spec reviews most others do. And the fact the Mark II still overheats in spite of the changes... I haven´t seen that before on a review either. Might have been the Santorini heat... ? It was worth the wait, this review!! My brother in law was trying to decide on the Mark II, I'll see him tomorrow, I believe your review will really help him decide. My regards to Rachel who's model performance made the video even more enjoyable. P.S.: We're back from Copenhagen since a few weeks and the R8+28mm f/2.8 combo did a great job again. I haven´t finished updating my photo site yet because my trusted 14 year old win7 HP laptop is slowly degrading, fan full of dirt. I launched myself on a Linux experiment, blog also on the site. Been busy with that... I want to secure my work environment to the new mini PC before I start picking apart the laptop for cleaning. And... I decided to still run Win10 as well because Canon, DxO et. al. don't make Linux versions...

[@JamesReader]

Thank you for the kind words as alway Philippe! I hope you are well. The R5 Mark II actually caused me no overheating issues in Santorini, strangely it tends to overheat here in the UK when recording my talking head segments for KZbin. I think for most people the overheating won't be too much of an issue though, I think your brother in law would be very happy with this camera. Glad to hear the 28mm setup is still working for you, it's so good for city exploration. Looking forward to seeing some of your shots when they are up on your website. I have recently been chatting with the guys over at DXO about trying their software, looking forward to giving it a try!

[@Galeidan]

I'm waiting for the R5 Mark III because I shoot 95% stills and the R5 excels at that. I'd rather invest in better lenses.

[@JamesReader]

I think that's the right move! The R5 is still so good.

[@Sorennn94]

Im glad that you picked up Santorini after the high season, it is still beautiful!

[@JamesReader]

It was amazing! What a beautiful island.

[@igorrutsch]

hi James ! I thought I was the only eye control fan out there ! I use a 3 back buttons layout for autofocus ( spot, eye detect and eye control ) really a big help. it's even better than my r6 mkii with every piece of glass but especially with the ones that don't have lightning fast AF motors ( 85 f2 and 85 1.2) very happy I upgraded

[@wentan8978]

same here! I follow the set up from a wildlife photographer for the triple button AF. It works damn well! I use my eye to quickly tell the camera which bird to focus on when there's a flock of birds. I also realised the AF works much better than R8 with all lenses, especially with the 200800. I will sometimes have issue focusing when using it with my R8 but not with the R5II.

[@JamesReader]

Yep I have it set up a very similar way Igor! That a great feature

[@ElBoyoElectronico]

Great and very well made video as usual! Sticking to my R5 as I am about to pull trigger for the RF600 f4 next year! Like they say, marry the lenses and date the bodies 😅

[@JamesReader]

Thank you! That's a beast of a lens, let me know what you think of it when you get it

[@ElBoyoElectronico]

@@JamesReader I’ll be turning 40 next year and finishing my exhaustive long-term additional training. I’ll most certainly reward myself with the RF600 and a few small wildlife and birdwatching tours! It is crazy expensive, I know, but I hope it will last a very long time and will keep me making more memories :)

[@lamddd]

Great video! that clog2 footage is insane! You guys captured great lighting! Like another commenter said, I’m dying to hear your review on the new 28-70 2.8! for some reason there hasn’t been any mainstream review out, despite being out for almost a month! you’ll get a ton of views. will be waiting for your definitive review on it! keep up the good work!

[@JamesReader]

Thank you so much! I really wanna get my hands on the 28-70 2.8 but it's still impossible to get here in the UK. I'm really hoping I get one to test soon

[@doktorr23]

I got the 28-70 f2.8. It’s amazing period. Almost As sharp as my prime lens rf 35 f1.4 vcm.

[@lamddd]

@ that’s really good to hear! what body are you pairing it with?

[@doktorr23]

@@lamddd r5ii

[@justesmond]

Thank you for the review James. I look ok forward to your reviews to get the real story. No fluff. Objective. Detailed. I shoot Limix for video and shoot Canon for photos on an R5 and R8. I think I’ll wait on the R5 mark ii. Maybe in a year or so I’ll pick up the mark ii. I don’t see a reason to run out and get it for photo first.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you Esmond, I really appreciate that! Yeah I think that's wise, the Lumix is hard to beat for video to be honest and the R5 is exceptional for photos (and no slouch for video either)

[@justesmond]

@@JamesReader Exactly. I love my R5 OG. Even if I get the mark ii later, I still see myself keeping the original R5. It’s has been the perfect camera for me over the past 3 years I’ve owned it.

[@neonladder]

I appreciate your review and will refer back to it as I continue my research on which direction to take on a camera and glass investment. In your video, you mentioned the challenges of editing on a MacBook Pro. I'd love to see more videos about editing videos from the Canon R5ii. I will check to see if you have any videos on editing for video.

[@JakeHolder]

Looking to dive head first into this hobby and can’t decide between the r6ii, r5 and r5ii

[@oldDan-l1c]

great video per usual. Have to disagree with you not he r5 vs r5ii colors. The mark ii has a much richer, more balanced color palate to my eyes. Reminds me of some of the older DSLRs. Original R5 rendered browns and oranges in a way I found extremely difficult to make appealing in post, not to mention the aggressive magenta cast to skin that was a PITA to deal with.

[@drbeardo6960]

Copy that🙌🏽

[@JamesReader]

Thank you for watching! Interesting, I did some side by side comparisons and didn't see anything too drastic. Regardless I'm really enjoying the colours from the R5 II. Definitely agree about the magenta cast though

[@Xirpzy]

I dont have the camera myself but I have seen a few comparisons. Colours do seem to be more natural on the R5 II. Especially skin tones. Should make it easier to tweak in post. Cant wait and see what the R6 III brings.

[@MahmoudSamyTube]

good work james, definitely i will wait for r6 mark iii hoping for 4k 60 with c-log 2

[@JamesReader]

Thank you Mahmoud! Really hoping the same

[@blackleafweddings2442]

hopefully a triple base iso too

[@BobbyD262]

Completely agree: 50p and faster aren't as "sharp" as even the R61, but the image is very usable for paid work, and has much more usable codes and more modern color profiles.

[@Graeme_MacDonald]

Great review! thanks! I'm so torn! I have a R5C which is my go to for Video. but want a dedicated photography camera to go along side it. I'm thinking the original R5 might be the way to go. I shoot mainly on location commercial campaigns, natural light or a touch of light from Profoto B10plus. or shooting runners for a commercial. but not sports events. what would you recommend? R5 OR R5 ii? thanks in advance!

[@Oscart2000]

Great video James. I just got my hands on the camera in the UK and its a near perfect camera for video. A bit dissapointed about the softness in the 50/100fps modes tho, my old R6 beats it in these modes. Hopefully this will be something they can fix in a firmware update adding a downsampled version.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you! I have faith we are gonna see an oversampled 50p mode by the end of the year 🤞

[@kennethlui2268]

You are right about the R5 II images being crispier than the R5. I notice that on my bird images. AF is better and pre-capture is game changing in Canon world.

[@btecww]

I am still enjoying my original R5. I am portrait and wedding photographer. The R5 is still great. I did purchase one of the discounted R3 at $3800 US. That has been a good action and video camera. The R5 mark II seems amazing for video but photo has hit diminishing returns. That is true for all camera brands. Heck the IPhone can give us a run for the money. Please keep sharing the R5M2 experiences with different lenses especially the 28-70 f2

[@JamesReader]

I think you’re absolutely right. It’s gonna be a while before we see something clearly better than the original R5. It’s that good.

[@blaspayri]

Thank you for this in-depth review. As always, it's incredibly useful, especially with the real-world usage examples and the artistic goals in mind. I did notice some halo effects, which are probably due to a mist filter. It would have been interesting to see some "unfiltered" footage for comparison.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you! I didn’t use any mist filters, the halation in a few clips is added in post in Davinci Resolve

[@Pataflafla]

I’ve had the same issue with the display a few times, for me it happens more when I turn off and on the camera semi-frequently to save battery. It’s a bit annoying when shooting wildlife. My solution has been to just leave the camera on and let the screen and EVF go to sleep instead of turning it off. Hope the firmware update fixes this. Absolutely loving the camera otherwise! Especially the pre-capture for wildlife

[@JamesReader]

Yeah you're right, it kept happening when I was travelling and turning the camera on and off a lot. Would be frustrating because you could definitely miss a crucial moment especially in wildlife. Let's hope it's sorted now!

[@77dris]

That video at 11:28 is so amazing, it's almost like being there! Would love the R5 II but it's a bit too pricey for me so I have to stick with the R6 II (which I love for photos as it's nearly perfect, I just wish it had Clog2 and even a cropped 4k120 mode for video).

[@JamesReader]

Thank you DRIS! I’m hoping we see CLOG 2 in the rumoured R6 III.

[@ItsBerg]

James, definitely update your body to the 1.0.1 update. I had the same thing with black video or the green messed up screen. Since the update, I've used my camera twice as much and haven't seen these issues pop up again.

[@JamesReader]

That’s really reassuring! Glad it seems to have been ironed out

[@freelancephotographermelbourne]

Thanks for the wonderful review James. Just wondering how you find the battery life compares to the original R5?

[@JamesReader]

Thank you so much! It seems maybe slightly worse than the original R5 but it's still pretty good. I couldn't get another battery so only travelled with a single battery for the entire week and managed to make it work.

[@samarianosans]

Watch game is strong with James 😉

[@JamesReader]

I appreciate that man! 🙏

[@duhyunko6807]

I really enjoyed reading your review. I've also been using the R5 Mark II for about 40 days, and it's such a great camera. However, I have a question about the secondary ISO at 4000. I shoot in RAW, and in DaVinci Resolve, it's possible to change the ISO for RAW footage. Is there any point in shooting with the ISO set specifically to 4000? When recording in a standard H.264 file, shooting at ISO 4000 makes sense, but does it matter when shooting in RAW?

[@ghalibsworld]

Please make a video about the new RF28-70mm F2.8. We are budget camera users who need a perfect budget solution for their R8, RP, or R6 mark 2. Also, we need a separate comparison video between the RF24-105mm L and RF28-70mm F2.8.

[@JamesReader]

Definitely planning on making one soon! I think the 28-70 2.8 is a great, versatile budget lens for those cameras.

[@MichaelThomas-qh4yv]

Good afternoon James Thank you for yet another excellent video review. I would like your opinion on something. I currently have the original Canon EOS R. I only shoot photography (not even tried video). I will continue as photography only (primarily) person. Should I go for the EOS R5 or R5 mkii as an upgrade body.

[@JamesReader]

Hi Michael, I honestly think the R5 would absolutely be the way to go. An amazing camera for photo.

[@MichaelThomas-qh4yv]

@JamesReader Thank you James for this prompt and considered advice, I'll definitely get the original R5. Thank you. PS: I'm using the Integral memory cards you recommended in a previous video. Again thank you.

[@RCGJR_]

My 2 year old r6 mkii is patiently waiting for r6 mkiii

[@lilsimsun]

Thank you for the detailed video James! I was wondering how's the movie crop mode? I mean, what do I gain/lose in terms of down sampling, frame rate etc. Thanks!

[@JamesReader]

Thank you for watching! I should have covered that more. I used the crop quite a bit for some of the shots of the boats at sunset. The super 35 crop is very sharp and useable.

[@mvladimirov2001]

Hallo James, It is a pleasure to watch your videos. So professionally and educationally done! Thank you! I do have one question - I shoot mostly stills and almost never video. I currently have a R6mII, but I'm hesitant, would the first R5 be better for me? I shoot nature, street, portraits of my family, and sometimes animals. The lenses I have are the RF24-70/2.8 and the RF70-200/2.8. Thanks in advance for your advice. Best regards Marian

[@JamesReader]

Hey Marian! Thanks so much for the kind words. I would honestly stick with the R6 II unless you happen to crop very heavily in post. Even then, if you check out some of my past comparisons between 24mp and 45mp, you'd be surprised how close they are in reality. Maybe hang on and see what the R6 III brings in the next few months, and there are rumours of a few other camera bodies coming to RF too.

[@eyesofatiger1]

Coming from a proud owner of a Canon R5 Mark II: Don't listen to all the haters out there that are talking negative non-sense. The camera is a beast and gets the job done. The autofocus is outstanding and muuuuuch better than the R5. You can use the 4k SRAW if you want great and sharp image with 4K 50/60fps. Its much sharper than the normal 4K at 50/60fps, and its even on par with the 8K sharpness. All the guys out there that are still wondering if they should upgrade - there is only one answer to this question - YES!!!

[@JamesReader]

Very true!!

[@rachelcrawford2688]

Do you have issues with overheating? Thinking about purchasing and that’s a major concern.

[@JGZphotography]

Autofocus handles still objects like portraits and landscapes with ease, but action sports require fast subject tracking, which is a different challenge. The R5 performs well, yet the R5ii boasts approximately a 20% improvement in tracking during sports activities such as volleyball or basketball. Although I seldom shoot video, I believe the R5ii has made the necessary improvements. By the way, no client has ever commented on my dynamic range being off. lol

[@goldfinch2283]

Good video and beautiful images !

[@JamesReader]

Thank you!

[@gmoney0987]

Hey brother. Just found your channel in the midst of tons of camera/lens research and just binged a bunch of your videos. Question for you. For PHOTOS only (I don’t care about video) what’s my best option bc they are all fairly close in price 1. The R50 2. The RP 3. The R10 I know the RP is a bit older but that and the R10 and pretty much the same price these days. Then there is the cheaper R50- which is better for my wallet Remember, it’s strictly for PHOTOS only, I don’t care about video performance and I’m mostly shooting portraits and moving kids/animals

[@peterpahn123]

Have you tried 4k50 CROP mode? On the R5 I it was MUCH better than the 4k50 Fullframe mode. Its very close to the 4k HQ mode. Is it the same on the R5 II? Thanks :)

[@robbie154]

The r5 ii has as much weaker AA filter which is why you get crisper photos with the R5ii. IMO that alone is worth the upgrade over the r5

[@JamesReader]

I did wonder if that was the case but didn't want to speculate! That's cool

[@blaspayri]

does that mean that for video you get more moiré at 4K?

[@robbie154]

@@blaspayri I don’t do video so selfishly I’m ok with the trade off if so. With that said I have not seen any complaints about moiré. Gerald undone was very pleased with the video and he’s one of the most technically sound KZbinrs.

[@hankdinardo4308]

Great Video James. Can I ask what diffusion filter were you using with the video?

[@JamesReader]

Thank you so much! I didn't use any diffusion filters, some of the bloom and halation is from a plugin called Dehancer.

[@regusankar]

Great review ever seen❤🎉

[@JamesReader]

Thank you!

[@jeremytan1098]

What lut did you use for 8:12? Really love the grade.

[@JamesReader]

Thank you Jeremy! I used the "Avondale" LUT from the 606 collection from Gamut. I think there's a link in the description. Also a bit of dehancer for film compression, halation and bloom.

[@emptyandseephotos7858]

Nice sunrise/set shooting

[@JamesReader]

Thank you!

[@krispino4610]

Hi, is the rf50mm wide enough for selfies? like I remember traveling with the rf 28, l needed to stretch out my hand just to photograph my head and barely even my neck, or will this distort my face in selfie range.

[@leopino___]

Hello, how are you doing? I am writing to ask you for help. I'm thinking about investing in my first full frame and I need it to be a hybrid camera (photo and video) Which is a better option canon r8 or sony a 7iii. I'm worried that the Canon isn't as sharp as the Sony... Thank you very much, I love your videos!

[@ArtoflightProductions]

James! The sunat 6 seconds are added inn post. Lock at the tracking and depth differences. Why would you do that?

[@JamesReader]

The window shot? Nah man it isn’t 😂 email me I’ll send you the raw video file.

[@doktorr23]

What lut did you use at 10:57 ?

[@angelislandcreativestudios2875]

Seeing lots of red rims around backlit subjects - like the cat under/behind the chair legs. Its back has a thick red ring on it. Which lens was used there?

[@JamesReader]

Hey! That’s just Dehancers halation added in post

[@TradeshowThomas]

another solid hybrid

[@JamesReader]

Agreed! So many great hybrids to choose from these days

[@tamerdurmus2662]

Do you have used the glimmerglas from tiffen for the pictures?

[@JamesReader]

Hey! Didn’t use any diffusion filters for the photos.

[@danny8888]

R5II 👍

[@HigherAEM]

I’m a portrait photographer with experience shooting landscape and commercial real estate. I currently shoot with the R6 (excellent camera) but looking to upgrade. I don’t do video. Should I aim for the R5 II or R6 II?

[@JamesReader]

For your use case the original R5 would probably suit you very well if that's something you would consider?

[@HigherAEM]

@@JamesReader I appreciate your reply. I really value your opinion James! Absolutely, I would consider the original R5. I also shoot a lot in low light and from what I read, the R6 or R6 II seem better in those situations. I’ve never tried the R5 so I don’t know how true that is. Is that accurate ?

[@JamesReader]

@@HigherAEM no worries man, glad to help! I wouldn’t worry about the low light difference in my opinion, again I tested the R6 side by side with the R5 and they are suprisingly close in low light.

[@HigherAEM]

@@JamesReader Amazing! Thank you again for your help. It’s very much appreciated 🙏🏾. Keep dropping great content man.

[@samildo0503]

Hello James, are you about to release you presets anytime soon?

[@JamesReader]

Releasing them very soon!

[@jeremytan1098]

and how did you get the red halation ?

[@JamesReader]

I used Dehancer for that.

[@traplightuniverse3584]

is the softness of the slo-mo something that could be addressed with a firmware update?

[@JamesReader]

Yeah I think Canon could let us have a 4k 50 mode downsampled from the 8k 50 at least. Probably nothing they can do about the 120fps though.

[@JohnMihelakis]

i seen another video that said the colors are less red, this video says there is no change?

[@Kenkichi24]

Does it still have wobble warping on RF 15-35 F2.8 @ 15mm for video?

[@JamesReader]

I'm afraid so! It's a little bit improved but still there.

[@prosunsport1]

Did you ever clean u sensor on the R5 over the 4 years .

[@JamesReader]

A couple of times but it generally stays clean thanks to the shutter closing when camera is off.

[@prosunsport1]

@JamesReader i wonder if a light haze left behind when cleaning glass sensor can effect image clarity or for that matter a layer of fine dust .

[@peterthung-u4o]

How about the video quality

[@alexku3348]

Bird photographers say Markii is one stop worse than the first R5 in terms of high iso image quality

[@rachelcrawford2688]

I’m thinking about requesting this for my company to purchase for hybrid use. I am concerned about the overheating issue. What do you suggest could be done to help that during long interviews? Also, incredibly informative video and beautiful work captured during your session!

[@JamesReader]

Thank you Rachel! I have had some overheating in long form videos. It’s a bit inconstant though because I have had instances where I have recorded for two hours with no issue. For any work where overheating is critical to avoid you can record in the 4k “non fine” mode. That won’t overheat. You can also buy a battery grip from Canon that includes a fan and that will cool the camera and extend record times. It’s called the CF-R20EP and is quite expensive. A cheaper alternative that works fairly well for me is that Smallrig sell a small fan that clips to the back of the camera very neatly and that helps reduce the cameras temperature. Hope that helped!

[@rachelcrawford2688]

@@JamesReader Thank you!! This is super helpful. If the company is prepared to invest in the camera, it would make sense to also invest in the battery grip, as it could be essential for maximizing the camera’s performance and efficiency. Again, well done and appreciate your time. 👍

[@thefelixwu]

If anyone can’t shoot great photo with r5 they certainly won’t with r52 😂

[@thirdwise]

Great video and thanks a lot for all the hard work put in on it. But please stop ending your sentences on the high note. Kind of drove me nuts bro.

[@JamesReader]

Damn. I tried not to do it this video 😂

[@andersistbesser]

Hm canon cameras have something about their colors that really turns me off. The footage looks good but i always think something is off watching . The colerss look strange in a way and not naturall

[@JamesReader]

I think it’s more likely that my color grading isn’t to your taste. Maybe download some of my RAW footage and see what you think of the unedited Canon colours.

[@typorosz]

NOBODY MENTIONES THAT R5 Mark II DOESN'T HAVE FRAME SCAN ADJUST (like in Lumix cameras e.g.), NO IBIS HIGH RES SHOTS (like the previous R5 cameras and Lumix, Sony cameras), NO SSD EXTERNAL RECORDING OPTIONS (like Lumix and other brands), IT HAS 1 EV WORST DYNAMIC RANGE THAN R5 (iss predecessor) AND WAY WORST SHADOW AND CHROME NOISE! BASED ON THE LATEST TEST AF DIDN'T IMPROVED, AT LEAST NOT IN THE CURRENT FIRMWARE.

[@donovanmortell8434]

is anyone else having weird IBIS jitters, like clicks ?

[@alexku3348]

I wish I was on the sunny beach right now, with a beautiful girl and free from my day-to-day routine of a big city…

[@JamesReader]

😔 I’m back in rainy England right now too so I’m right there with you!

[@typorosz]

NO FRAME SYNC OPTION AND NO SSD RECORDING OPTION!!! NO IBIS HIGH RES SHOT (400 MP OPTION). NO OLDER BATTERIES ACCEPTENCE! sRAW INTERLACING AND MOIRE!

[@Mark-i4h7r]

For the way YOU use the camera, the upgrade is irrelevant and pointless. This camera is better for fast action photography of wildlife and sports. You don't do that. No one will ever tell the difference in your photos from MarkI to MarkII. Guess you needed a GAS upgrade

[@JamesReader]

Yeah I think I covered that. It was the video features I upgraded for. Very happy I did too, any photo improvements are just a bonus.

[@poolpool64]

Canon shill!😂😂