32" 240Hz 1440p Fast IPS Monitor | Titan Army P32A2S2

[@0x8080]

Hey just wanted to drop a word and let you know I was watching your videos back in 2009-2011 is era when I first started building PCs. Glad I found you man, I didn't know you were out here making content.

[@maclainjohnson7666]

Yeah man same for me. I recently subscribed this year, but I remember watching his reviews on graphics cards and PC components over 10 years ago.

[@spacehead74]

Props for the Ernest movie clip. That movie ruled. 1440p rendered at 4k for gaming is the way to go.

[@Sonyboj]

I have a 32" 1440p VA and its fine as far as pixel count goes. Also can use at 100% scale. Agree on 4k, it is still overkill. I like that this is IPS because VA is a smear fest.

[@naoltitude9516]

you could get the ktc h27e22, its VA so still amazing contrast but extremely good motion clarity, also quite affordable for 1440p 240hz

[@eustacequinlank7418]

@@naoltitude9516 32" is perfect for 1440, though I like it for flight sims when gaming so the extra visual space is nice. Can't go back personally! I'm a photographer of 30 years now, and I stare at iMac OLEDs (once 27" now just 24" sadly) using Capture One and Lightroom for image editing and pixel peeping beyond what is is acceptable levels of OCD all day every day. Not just to evaluate games I love - every time I will bring the RAW files home to finish off on the IPS 32" as the presentation on the OLED never gives an authentic optical preview of what a large format print would be like. It is deceptive in what it reproduces on screen. As well as using Hasselblad X2Ds in the studio (not my personal cameras or equipment, I'm not that wealthy), I deal with scans and resolutions coming from large and medium format films cameras with an Imacon scanner and a Nikon 9000 Coolscan, this is where you appreciate what is 'acceptable' pixel density, micro contrast and fidelity on a monitor because there is a physical object with which to reference optically. You're looking at micro contrast of film grain and dyes, it is almost impossible to evaluate as there is no inherent resolve. There is always better for much more money, but QHD 1440p at 32" is currently a sweet spot for me. Sitting with my face two inches from the screen and then claiming the edge rendering of text falls apart somehow would be an idiot's take when spending money (if you have it available). The 144hz 32" (400 nits and not 'true HDR') isn't perfect out of the box, you will have to calibrate your equipment and settings (with little effort actually), but the extra peak in nits still gives a fantastic vibrancy for gaming and movies at high refresh rates. Relatively speaking, there is no perfect monitor when you have people claiming a 1000 nit brightness (or 'whatever nits') and above is the only acceptable standard for a HDR screen at 32" (which is, in my 30 year experience of using monitors and displays going back to VGA and SVGA CRTS, a complete b******t tech standpoint usually coming from a know nothing early adopter/consumer or someone looking to justify a recent pricey purchase they are not fully confident in due to lack of understanding). Half the time the extra nits are deceptive simply because of ambient room lighting (iMacs in particular coming in with thick painted in black screen bezels behind a gloss finish that gives the _impression_ of a 'real' black point on screen). The relative experience of something new is part and parcel of technology, something the acolytes of exclusively top end equipment don't ever seem to understand while touting one format over the other with obnoxious impudence. Marketing dogs. It's like they adore technology, but don't really understand how it progresses edit: or more fundamentally - the function and application of it. 'On paper' experts with a catalogue and a bunch of third party talking head reviews - no experience. Anyway, my divergent rant about screens is done, 'poligies.

[@yarincool1237]

​@@naoltitude9516VA is not good unless you get something something like a Samsung G7, but I think cheaper IPS like these are worth more, VA is only good if you're a very casual gamer.

[@raynjpg]

Seems like a pretty decent display, but $400 is kinda pricey. I'd have to see how accurate the colors are before making a purchase like this, cause I like to edit photos on my computer.

[@LordCarmesimXXVII]

After using a 24" 1440p, I could never go back to a 32" 1440p. The picture on the 24" is amazingly sharp, love it. I'm using a 27" now, for better immersion and a little more viewing distance, that's the max I go for 1440p.

[@504Trey]

After using a 14" 1440p monitor I could never go back to 24" 1440p

[@LordCarmesimXXVII]

@@504Trey That's shitty for immersion in games.

[@AndyMitchellUK26]

I'm using a 32" 768p TV right now 😬 I need to upgrade badly, I miss my old triple 24" setup but the house I'm in now doesn't have space for it so a 32" single screen is the best I can do. This monitor needs to release in the UK already as I would like one after checking out multiple reviews.

[@cameronm3284]

I love IPS for my PC

[@Snayz_yt]

Are the sources detected automatically? if 2 sources are on at the same time and I switch off the first one, does it automatically switch to the second? Thanks for your feedback

[@numberz010]

Nice review, i'm cooked on oled and really don't want to use anything non oled at this point but thanks for reviewing these affordable displays

[@thetewks]

I tried finding it on the vesa certified list and it's not there. Did you have any issues with HDR?

[@poru208]

Ernest Scared Stupid, lol a true classic

[@theg0yschannel386]

I think It's easier to commit to ips and 1440p when you fully ditch game consoles.

[@madant7777]

I use the Alienware AW2723df that is 240/280Hz, 600 nit, 1440p, Fast IPS, for the last 8 months. I'm more than satisfied for now, OLEDs are not there yet.

[@madant7777]

@Ayedidyae I actually understand the matter, not just reading specs.

[@madant7777]

@Ayedidyae Specs are not what I'm talking about, it should have been obvious if you know the matter indepth. OLED monitors now are only decent in terms of longevity and are still gaming only displays that have to be babied all the time, and even then there is no guarantee they will be without faults in cca 3 years. I'm not cashing 1000+ for that, thank you. Even though I have the money, I don't need the inconvenience and that bothering me. Plus pixel clarity/arrangement and QD reflecting light in bright conditions.

[@madant7777]

@Ayedidyae Again, you don't know how to read, I never said IPS is better, just that the state of OLEDs now is still an expensive toy that will not last long and that is not the only downside. Ad to that the price outside US and what people actually have, and that is monitors half the spec I have, and how much the majority would spend and expect it to last - no, OLEDs are not there yet.

[@madant7777]

@Ayedidyae Wow, you are really deep in that cool-aid...

[@micpan_yt]

This is a good monitor, the only problem is it's not a vesa mount compatible. Sad.

[@ilKamuTube]

This is perfect for me, thanks, can you confirm the crossair gaming function?

[@StaySic4Ever]

It's decent. Though I can't stand low PPI I sit arms length from it. I'd say that's medium distance more regular per say. I liked 24" 1440p but those didn't continue with higher specs. 27" 1440p I can easily see pixels even when leaning back when I look at small details be it text and such. Though I plan to get a 4k OLED anyway.

[@thehubbleton]

The ghosting is immersive to me because I did too much acid.

[@variglo]

I think it's a bit messed up that clicking on the link for the monitor whilst in the UK will lead to a ASUS ROG Strix XG27AQM 699 Pound monitor. Why is it leading to a way more expensive competitors product by default?

[@prebenjaeger]

Scaling on 4K is OK because everything looks clearer and all, but sadly DPI scaling on Windows remains shite

[@teksyndicate]

If you're running multiple monitors and they have different scaling, it's a nightmare

[@starc.]

why get a 32" when you can get a 45" OLED 240hz like my corsair xeneon 45WQHD240

[@Sonyboj]

45" would be impossible to play tactical shooters on unless you lean back really far out?

[@teksyndicate]

I hated having a 40" monitor on my desk. If it's in a living room, maybe... But also, the price

[@haewymetal]

Why do people buy VA/IPS monitors at this point in time when OLED monitors are becoming affordable? Compared to my old PG279Q the 271QRX looks leaps ahead on every level.

[@michaelf1303]

I think burn in anxiety is a limiting factor for a lot of potential buyers. I logically know that the mitigation systems are amazing nowadays, but still a lingering factor.

[@matthewt5573]

Burn in and the fact that a $350 ish monitor is far cheaper than $1000

[@haewymetal]

@@matthewt5573 Burn in is a bit of a non issue unless you plan on playing world of warcraft at max brightness for 12 hours a day. And once you go oled you never want to go anything else. IPS look so awful compared to oled due to the lack of ATW Polarizers and inherent IPS Glow and BLB. Cant even watch a dark movie or play a dark game without getting bothered by sheen. Not to mention the ghosting and blur in motion.

[@teksyndicate]

I got rid of my OLED. It was so annoying to use as a desktop monitor. Only good as a tv

[@haewymetal]

@@teksyndicate What OLED did you use? A TV? And what do you mean by "only good as a TV?" Sounds like you had a TV. I cant go back to my PG279Q, which is standing next to my 271QRX. The IPS look like its covered in a grey filter with vaseline ontop whenever ive been looking at the OLED for more than 5 minutes. And anything dark looks absolutely horrible on the IPS. And HDR on the OLED look amazing in both games and movies while they look really dull and washed out on the IPS.

[@r2stik]

wrong link

[@teksyndicate]

What country are you in? I am getting reports that out goes to a different item in other countries

[@MyouKyuubi]

32 inch 1440p is like 27 inch 1080p, it's awful, lmao.

[@TeamAestheticss]

Thec9nd

[@tiREV55]

Thirst.

[@thrice5560]

oled 240hz is faster

[@teksyndicate]

Star pupil here

[@heavenbound9641]

all oleds are not that much faster than ips if at all. alot of these oleds are ACTUALLY WAY OVERRATED. .

[@Snayz_yt]

Are the sources detected automatically? if 2 sources are on at the same time and I switch off the first one, does it automatically switch to the second? Thanks for your feedback