im going to have to re_upload this,,,not really fullscreen.enjoy anyway
@cScottD3 жыл бұрын
After watching a lot of these, I have come to the conclusion that as much as I enjoy playing along, I am actually pretty terrible at it. 😁
@kcsnipes3 жыл бұрын
I was completely baffled here and I’ve only managed to get about 25% correct so far and I have the luxury of rewinding 😆
@cScottD3 жыл бұрын
@@kcsnipes I try to follow the same rules the panel does, so if I go back, I only rewatch 20 seconds… but there have been a few times when I've "cheated" by going back and watching the whole thing again, and I STILL got it wrong.
@dominich2263 Жыл бұрын
You are not alone
@keithnaylor19812 жыл бұрын
2:46 Stunning!!!
@moonpawooe71343 жыл бұрын
I went to the same school as Alfred' marks two sons trye and skid
@user-ht8pn6dv9j7 ай бұрын
This episode shows me the least favourite inspector of all in this programme: in his way of investigation I see nothing either of compassion nor of cool-headedness, just convincing enough as the proof of an intention of getting results.
@kcsnipes3 жыл бұрын
This seems impossible to get but the panel was like ‘ez clap’
@kcsnipes3 жыл бұрын
Bro why the second bullet and why the missing wine ?
@SCFlynn7 ай бұрын
Second bullet to alert others once the killer had set up the evidence. The wine was drugged.
@kcsnipes7 ай бұрын
@@SCFlynn now I have rewatch I can’t remember why I even asked but thank you 🙏
@kcsnipes7 ай бұрын
@@SCFlynn ah I forgot about the silencer on the first shot but why make the second shot wouldn’t the body be discovered eventually ? I guess because there was an alibi for the murder to be not there and have the body found 🤔 but the wine was drunk by the other woman as well so it wasn’t drugged but someone drank more and it wasn’t accounted for ? Regardless Thanks for bringing me back to this series I had forgotten this one and was fun to rewatch