418. What's Happened To The Dinosaurs?

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

So surprised to see so many people on here who are likely Christians, not believing in what the Bible says and spending more time paying attention to evolution and what man says than what God says. Look at what most of the responses on here are. Well man says......well scientists say......well evolution says ...... It's truly discouraging and I hope God will open up your eyes to what his word says over what fallen humanity says.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

For good creationist channels to hear more about biblical science I suggest AIG (Answers in Genesis) and ICR (institute for creation research).

[@bunkyman8097]

"Biblical science" is the most laughable oxymoron I have ever heard!

[@KINGofKINGSandLORDofLORDS]

Shocking ... on the Ark... really

[@thapelomaraisane8705]

I think this is a dangerous discussion to have without the authority a person learned in the sciences. This is not a fruitful discussion. Grace and peace.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Why would it not be fruitful and how do you know if this person was an expert or not?

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

I agree!

[@abundantharmony]

What about the hindu temples that show carvings of humans cohabitating with dinosaurs?

[@funislamicfacts7448]

That one interview that made me "doubt" this channel. Young Earthers sounds like Flat Earthers.

[@John5TwentyFour]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jGeboWprrc2lic0

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Big difference between the two. Lol

[@funislamicfacts7448]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 Logic is not your strenght, right? If I wanted to say they are the same, I would have said they are the same, not "sounds like". Of course, 2 things can be similar yet not the same. Waste of time.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

@@funislamicfacts7448 and yet they are not similar either. If you want to believe evolution that's your choice but seeing as you are a Muslim you have other more pressing spiritual needs than that.

[@funislamicfacts7448]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 hahahahahahahahaha I'm making fun of pedophet Muhamad and you think I'm muslim. Your lack of reasoning/judgment is convincing to stay away from religion (if that is what programming your brain). You don't understand what I say because you take everything to first degree, literally, to the letter. And that is the problem with both young earthers and flat earthers. If you didn't see it, that was the parallel I was making. If you still don't understand, I can nothing for you.

[@jackwilmoresongs]

In Genesis 6:14 God tells Noah to coat the inside and outside of the ark with pitch. "Make yourself an ark of gopher wood, ... cover it within and without with pitch." If the tar of petroleum derivative found in the earth, such as the "tar pits" was meant as in (Gen. 14:10) that would suggest ancient compressed vegetation. Tar would suggest older earth remains buried in the ground before the Deluge. And that would suggest a pre-adamic world that had been long gone by Noah's day.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Anyone who takes the time to consult a reasonable dictionary of geology will find that pitch can be extracted by distilling or heating wood. In fact, prior to the rise of the petroleum and coal industries, this was exactly how pitch was made. For at least one thousand years, the pitch-making industry in Europe flourished. It was the pitch from this industry which assisted in the construction of those great wooden sailing ships which figured so prominently in European history. Pitch making was a skilled trade, and many European surnames bear testimony to that fact today. In Polish, the word for pitch or tar is ‘smola’. Any Polish telephone directory displays names such as Smola, Smolander, Smolen, Smolenski and Smolarz. These surnames simply mean ‘the man who makes pitch’.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Likewise in Germany, the word for pitch is ‘Teer’, and it appears in names such as Teer and Teerman. Even the English have families whose name is Pitcher, Tarrier or Tarmen, to mention but a few. These all indicate that the trade of manufacturing pitch was extremely common throughout Europe. So how did they make pitch before the growth of the petroleum and coal industries? Their first step was to obtain resin from the pine trees which at that time grew in dense forests throughout Europe. A herringbone pattern of cuts was gouged into the tree trunk and as the resin ran down the grooves it was collected in a pot at the base of the tree. Pine resin is still collected in this way in Poland, the Ukraine, Russia, Finland and other European countries where pine forests are still to be found. When the resin had finished flowing, the trees were chopped down, covered in soil or ash, and burned slowly to produce a lightweight black pure form of carbon called charcoal. The last step in the process of making pitch was to add the powdered charcoal to the boiling pine resins. Different proportions of charcoal would produce pitch of different properties. It was this pitch which was used to waterproof the large ocean-going wooden ships

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Now, while I cannot say for sure that Noah obtained pitch for the ark exactly in this fashion, it does illustrate that you don’t have to be able to extract either oil or coal from the ground in order to make pitch. Anyone who had cut down as many trees as Noah and his helpers for the manufacture of an ocean-going ark would certainly have found out about tree resins. If Europeans had a well known and widely used method of making pitch before the discovery of petroleum, obviously Noah could also have had the same satisfactory way of waterproofing the ark with its covering of pitch.

[@PBRimmer]

Videos like this are great for making atheists.

[@TheSaintFrenzy]

Everyone knows there is a creator, we are all without excuse.

[@mattb7069]

It’s true. I’m a Christian and the vast majority of intellectual Christians repudiate the ideas of young earth creationism that insist that the t- Rex was on the ark. I am shocked that this channel supports that idea. I thought it had more intellectual integrity.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Atheists choose not to believe because they refuse to have faith.

[@silive4067]

The Bible say two of every kind not species. So a T. rex necessarily didn’t have to be on the ark

[@silive4067]

@@mattb7069 ^

[@vnuschan]

Love this channel but this response...was not it.

[@jesseplz]

Disappointed in this answer not clear or helpful

[@levikaplan2951]

This is embarrassing. I honestly mean this. No human being ever lived with a bloody dinosaur. There is nothing about dinosaurs in the bible. God just stop.

[@mattb7069]

Oh my… I think this channel just lost major credibility. I am shocked Bobby is a young earther. I was going to have my students listen to one episode before each class, so that they can get a well-rounded and scientifically sound perspective that demonstrates the reasonableness of Christian faith from an old earth/creation perspective that engages science instead of pitting it against the Bible. I won’t be using this channel.

[@dokidokibibleclub]

@StandingForTruthMinistries will take on your challenge. Debating you live streamed in front of your class on the best evidence you have for evolution. How about it?

[@mattb7069]

@@dokidokibibleclub Since I don’t believe in Darwinian evolution, I would be arguing with you not against you. I am an old earth creationist. I am also a history teacher, not a science teacher. That being said, if you or your young earth adherence are interested in debating the science with other Christian scientists, then I recommend you contact the ministry Reasons to Believe/Hugh Ross. But I would suggest you first watch their debates with Ken Ham/Answers in Genesis. The young earth position loses to old earth creationism each time-quite badly in my opinion.

[@dokidokibibleclub]

​@@mattb7069 Are you seeing any of my replies? YT keeps removing them. Man, this platform I'm telling ya

[@dokidokibibleclub]

I'll break up my reply in a few bits maybe that'll work

[@dokidokibibleclub]

​@@mattb7069 Thank you for the reply and recommendations.

[@pablodiazgamo5969]

I think that is not about believe what we are talking here it's about facts. And if you go to a science book you can easily find this explanations. There is a problem here where we mix science with spiritual beliefs. You said you can't believe that just an asteroid could kill dinosaurs but not every other live on earth. I encourage you to go to a scientist and ask him about this. So you realize how is possible God is about faith but not science.

[@daman7387]

I agree with you that he is not a good person to be talking about the meteor impact, but it is absolutely necessary to mix faith and science. God made science!

[@daman7387]

@Michael David Dixon yup

[@mikeschmoll7762]

@Pablo Diaz Gamo you should remember, that most scientists argue on a completely different worldview (naturalist, materialist). Of course they will explain things differently. And they don't stop with dinos, the go on to the virgin birth, Jesus miracles, his resurrection and so on. (I'm not defending young Earth here, just want it to mention)

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

So you think a science book trump's the Bible, eh!? Wow

[@pablodiazgamo5969]

@@newcreationinchrist1423 I didn't mean that. The bible is the most famous book of all time. The most translated, the most read, the most studied, and is the sacred book of the biggest religion. It trumps a science book. However we can't say the bible is a history book or any source for science. So in this sense science books trumps. The Bible explains the mystical/spiritual realm, but not the world we see. Every book has its own purpose, that was what I meant.

[@darrendavis4731]

Continental drift?

[@Bossmark123]

That is stupid thing I hear dinosaur were on Ark no they didn't they die by a meteor

[@MartyMcFly1085]

His comments about why he doesn’t believe in the asteroid are quite astoundingly ignorant. There have been 5 known mass extinctions on earth history, and the asteroid wasn’t even the worst, only wiping out 75% of life. The CT boundary (the timing of the asteroid) has dinosaur fossils below and none above, and has very high level of iridium that is common in asteroids and rare on earth. The asteroid crater has been found and dated, in the Yucatán, and despite devastating life on earth the crater is only between 100-200 km wide, and would not have destroyed any dinosaur fossils except perhaps those in the direct path of impact. The evidence for asteroid wiping out dinosaurs 65 million years ago is beyond reasonable doubt. The evidence for young earth creation is non falsifiable and not needed to explain the current world we live in. Trust the science for truth, the Bible for myth.