Check out the Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com/ What do you guys think does the US need the super long range missiles or are they fine with the AMRAAM ?
@MrFactualGamingOfficial2 жыл бұрын
Do a video, where you use both the Aim-54 Phoenix and Aim-152 (Raytheon/Hughes version) and give your opinion on which is better
@thedishonoredamerican1292 жыл бұрын
Taking into consideration missiles like the Chinese PL-15 and the Meteor, the US needs long range missiles.
@s3viking2142 жыл бұрын
I definitely think that the US should make a long range missile. If not that then at least buy some meteors but knowing the US. They would prefer to make their own.
@Moistbread9552 жыл бұрын
Maybe make a video using AIM 120, 152, and 260
@Ilyak19862 жыл бұрын
Depends on if it wants to continue using 4th gen non-stealth jets. F-22s and F-35s can get close enough to sling AMRAAMs. F-15 EXs? Not so much. My question is what happens in something like an F-35 vs. J-20 fight in which both sides have stealth. Is it all going down to the merge?
@russbarrow2 жыл бұрын
Seems like the biggest mistake by the MIG-31s was firing together. Seems like a 10 second delay between each fire would put up a storm of missles keeping the F15 defensive for longer or finding the F15 after believing that the missle threat had passed.
@Drobbik2 жыл бұрын
Yeah that's kind of what I've been thinking because if the missile were to know from a further distance that the F-15 is cranking, then it would course correct early increasing the chance that the F-15 doesn't notch it.
@oddy16372 жыл бұрын
@Shubhabrata banerjee yes Those r Ms
@ravirajsisodia64752 жыл бұрын
Yahh.... Sending Missile at intervals would have kept F15 defensive entire time.
@puneetkumarsingh14842 жыл бұрын
Exactly my thought also. in facy shouls probably line up one behind another also. That way they won't be locked all at once. Who was flying the migs in the video though?
@ravirajsisodia64752 жыл бұрын
@@puneetkumarsingh1484 look like GS just wanted to make it easy for him😂
@fubaralakbar68002 жыл бұрын
The MiG-31 has always been a fascinating plane to me--so big and heavy, so single-minded, and so utterly incapable of dogfighting. It's basically a flying SAM site.
@patrickreindel692 Жыл бұрын
Absolute Missle Trucks.
@zx-3948 Жыл бұрын
That's a funny way of putting it. And I love it
@ThunderChunky101 Жыл бұрын
Yes! Also pretty successful at that job.
@georgevanhoose6333 Жыл бұрын
It does one thing, and it does it very, VERY well. Probably the deadliest BVR aircraft in the world.
@ThunderChunky101 Жыл бұрын
@@georgevanhoose6333 Other than all the BVR fighters built since the 70's...
@davecolwell7252 жыл бұрын
13:23 what a shot! Thank you for including shots like this. Absolutely beautiful! People say MS Flightsim has good graphics. This has got to be seriously close in situations like this! If only they could put things together and put their Geomapping system into DCS. Imagine that live weather and ground in DCS. Dang bro.
@mariusbehr9252 жыл бұрын
damn those 4 migs firing at the same time was scary
@fingers19712 жыл бұрын
...and useless
@manhngo42752 жыл бұрын
@@fingers1971 in reality, they won't miss.
@manhngo42752 жыл бұрын
@@kermittoad Mig 31s are patrolling the Russia space frequently as I know. They use R37M a super long-range air-to-air missile to destroy enemy jets.
@danihaldar76272 жыл бұрын
@@fingers1971 mad fu** only in dcs.. In reality f 15 dast.. 😜😜
@wasirahman52332 жыл бұрын
Pretty useless lol. If they fired one after another they could do much better job.
@Musavicch2 жыл бұрын
I really like the situational awareness you provide us in your content in the form of 3rd person camera angles and zoom-ins! Thank you!
@spyous78842 жыл бұрын
For once GS's optimism was not wasted
@Hydra_65442 жыл бұрын
Read this right after he said it and I expected instant death immediately following
@fwijffels2 жыл бұрын
Would love to see some more missions, like breaking into territory, attacking targets etc
@cloudforest40872 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same.
@murderer52902 жыл бұрын
These videos are top tier when it comes to DCS. Keep up the good work.
@fervivere86002 жыл бұрын
would love to see a combat f-14, f-15 and f-16 vs mig-29, mig-31 and su-27, but with late 80s technology.
@pigeoncrazy66152 жыл бұрын
Exactly, a mix of western and European fighters vs. Soviet and Chinese fighters , with human pilots would be much nicer .
@brentgilliam12092 жыл бұрын
Love the videos overall, but the tact view with in-depth explanations is what makes this channel so special. Thx GS for all the great content you keep producing!!
@lonelyone692 жыл бұрын
I still find it insane that engineers and designers can create massive poles that can propel themselves to 6 times the speed of sound. And be able to withstand almost 60G turns without ripping itself apart.
@sadlerbw92 жыл бұрын
It's crazy what aircraft (and these missiles really are tiny aircraft) can do when they don't have to worry about a squishy meat-sack inside of them getting pulped by g-forces.
@waldek7772 Жыл бұрын
@@sadlerbw9 its also to do with the thrust to weight, if a fighter jet pulled anywhere near that hard it would bleed all its speed so quick
@yawningkitty4572 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see a 1 vs 1 between the English Electric Lightning and the Mig 21.
@longtimber2 жыл бұрын
Flying through those clouds so close to the mountain tops freaked my ass out. Lol
@0188Charly2 жыл бұрын
the way these missiles manage to find their targets after a hundred miles without any uplink seems to good to be true ;)
@GrowlingSidewinder2 жыл бұрын
Maybe they’re simulating the uplink
@heatblast8762 жыл бұрын
@@bobjones-bt9bh R 37M is not model properly, Especially in DCS because doesn't show the proper performance of the missile of R 37M. While the AIM 152 is totally mystery.
@brandonprice35662 жыл бұрын
GS, As always really appreciate the videos. I have recently started playing DCS, and am starting to understand the time/effort that it would take to become as proficient as you are. Keep it up my bro.
@Sevo-2 жыл бұрын
"Just gonna scare them" Proceeds to annihilate their team
@rugger3buffalo2 жыл бұрын
It's 150 miles from Buffalo to Syracuse... That's an insane size battlefield.
@baomao72432 жыл бұрын
The BVR distances in this engagement are incredible. Wow.
@IndyBobcat2 жыл бұрын
Excellent use of defensive BFM and terrain. Enjoyed the video, thanks!
@austintaylor73632 жыл бұрын
I would really like to see engagement like this with other players. Should coordinate with the boys and see if we can't get a 5v5 of pure insanity going. 👀👀
@seanklassen14132 жыл бұрын
That fly off into the sunset 👌
@levidotson66102 жыл бұрын
It’d be interesting to see sidewinder fly the foxhound and get to see the axehead from the other side
@MattWaller042 жыл бұрын
Same here man I’d love to see that
@CHRnorton2 жыл бұрын
That's what we used to call "Four on the Floor." Real exciting, great job.
@beatboxbuggi68842 жыл бұрын
I’m thinking the MiG-31 was never even really meant to need to defend, it’s just supposed to outrange and outrun it’s opponents
@garlicdragon8664 Жыл бұрын
Its an interceptor, meant to shoot down bombers and spy planes and patrol. Using it for a direct fight with an eagle is very suboptimal.
@yuvl322 жыл бұрын
It’s not the plane, it’s the missile )))
@tomas71582 жыл бұрын
Most of us wanted to see an upgraded Phoenix and we did. We see why the meteor was needed, or stealth. M31is still the king of bwr. Old but not obselite.
@kcf8812 жыл бұрын
Always great videos. Well done!
@whistlingbadger2 жыл бұрын
I'm reminded of the F-15 pilot in the original Red Dawn. "It was five to one. I got four."
@anneudysheredia75402 жыл бұрын
It would be nice to see a BVR with the AIM 152 vs the Felon SU 57.
@DDayJayke2 жыл бұрын
Good to see you didn't get demolished this time
@42grath2 жыл бұрын
When I saw the title for this vid it gave me flashbacks to that one BVR fight you were doing against the MIG-31 and kept getting smoked 😂
@billisaacs7022 жыл бұрын
Glad you finally got a missile to help against the MiG 31 Dingbat. "Ohhh Aaaaarchie...."
@CNCTEMATIC2 жыл бұрын
Yes! Finally those Mig-31s get their comeuppance! Interesting how the Mig-31s can lock you up for a 175nm launch; your radar didn't seem to see them at those ranges.
@Cleanasdirt21827 ай бұрын
I enjoyed the tac view, it was explained well.
@pedrosura5 ай бұрын
Wow, I just realized that I worked in 1990 on probably the follow on missile to the Aim 152. We called it “AAAM” advanced air to air. St Louis MO, Mc Ds. We put the 6 ft model through the paces in the wind tunnel. Very similar to the picture on the PDF file.. BTW, the file inclided is for the F-14. The mod in this video… is it something else?
@heathb43192 жыл бұрын
Talk about turning those first to migs into lawn darts.... Beautiful.
@viktor_v-ughnda_vaudville_4762 жыл бұрын
That’s crazy the impenetrable 4x mig 31s with their hypersonics that shut down soo many of GS attempts just got handled by a single f-15
@jayvee85022 жыл бұрын
A single F22 with just AIM-120s would have done it too.
@viktor_v-ughnda_vaudville_4762 жыл бұрын
@@jayvee8502 I believe it and I kinda feel like he did that already, right??
@satcom62 жыл бұрын
If I'm, correct, the mig 31 (fox bat) was intended as a Soviet counter to the SR-71. While no missiles (officially) impacted the blackbird, they did a semi decent job of keeping U.S pilots on edge, and (in the event of a missle launch detection), between the mig 31 speed and ceiling combined with their armament, the SR-71 pilots would absolutely punch the throttle because their best advantage was to flat-out, out run the missiles (even at high altitudes with my w drag on high velocity missiles). Again I may be mistaken, but props to the Soviet engineers for putting something that could be called "threatening" together with regards to the blackbird. And doubly so for those pilots that could hammer down an SR-71, few of us will ever know that fear, or gaul.
@TymaDem2 жыл бұрын
Now, imagine something like an F-23 with AIM 260!
@slickninjadude91652 жыл бұрын
Have you done a BVR fight bandit unknown video? I am also curious to see what its like on the other side of the aim 152?
@nawtynick92 жыл бұрын
The Tact View with your explanations are great.
@timbaskett62992 жыл бұрын
Kind of funny how the F-15 has come "full circle". It started out as "not a pound for air to ground, then improved that with the "Charlie", was modified into a strike fighter with the "Echo", and with the "Echo X-ray" is an air to air missile slinger again!! I'd be curious about a prospect of an export single seat "F-15G" model with the improvements from the eventual F-15F, which is what I'm sure the EX will be called.
@Justanotherconsumer2 жыл бұрын
The current version is basically an updated version of the F6D Missileer concept.
@Strigon0082 жыл бұрын
I was expecting him to go down, I was wrong. He finally beat the Foxhound suffering.
@martinpalmer62032 жыл бұрын
yep with an imaginary missile LOL
@Strigon008 Жыл бұрын
@@martinpalmer6203 It was on the drawing board, just never saw production due to times changing. There was a test model in use though.
@davidfecak95692 жыл бұрын
Nice one, big shoots! Thank you.
@gringogreen47194 ай бұрын
Great video but I really enjoyed the weather element to this video.
@TheCar7802 жыл бұрын
Question, how do pilots or aircrews validate Kills in a BVR environment. Also I have read that the Meteor is capable of changing burn rate on the motor as well as direction.
@Mike_Romeo2 жыл бұрын
They dont. Kill calidation is done afterwards by analysing data records and investigations of the wracks
@coolermoves2 жыл бұрын
Great video. Dude. 😮
@SkeetSystem2 жыл бұрын
I like that 45mi is the up close and personal engagement :]
@johnhermann74982 жыл бұрын
Biggest mistake the Navy made was chosing to upgrade the Plastic Bug instead of the Mighty Tomcat ... Second biggest mistake was ignoring long range BVR combat and cancelling the -152 project and leaving the Super Bug hamstrung with -120s....
@air-headedaviator18052 жыл бұрын
I hope one day we see player operated Mig-31s. That would be a different animal of play
@spinningsquare1325 Жыл бұрын
The original mig-31 only carries an underwhelming R-33 fox 1 missile
@ThatOneBozoAnimater2 жыл бұрын
Wake up babe, Growling Sidewinder uploaded the video you wanted.
@takoslvt2 жыл бұрын
That missile sure knows where it isn't.
@红杏出墙-c7g Жыл бұрын
There is no way that one F-15 could shoot down 4x Mig-31 in one fight. The 4x Mig-31 just won't follow F-15's rhythm. They will not fly shoulder to shoulder, they will fly one after another with a probably 20 miles gap, then they will shoot one by one and keep the F-15 busy.
@edwardsarty957211 ай бұрын
Can’t wait to see you in an f14D!
@theelectricgamer98892 жыл бұрын
Day 103 of asking for F-16 vs F-20/F-5 dogfight
@jimmy_wang_2 жыл бұрын
Day 104 of asking not to do that 😆
@theelectricgamer98892 жыл бұрын
@@jimmy_wang_ Sorry, I don’t listen to trolls
@jimmy_wang_2 жыл бұрын
Lmao..... lighten up it's just a joke plus it gives your comment more attention 🤠
@bread31612 жыл бұрын
I respect your dedication
@stealthfinger2 жыл бұрын
I'd watch it
@parrotlander2 жыл бұрын
Thoughts as a casual watcher- I'm disappointed that a radar lock, once lost even briefly, can't be quickly re-acquired and guidance resumed. Especially in fox-1 fights, it makes little sense that a brief gap in tracking wastes a missile. Second, I don't understand why with data links, a wingman or AWACS couldn't guide your missile in for you from a safe distance, allowing the lead to break off and go fully defensive.
@GregThrasherTechGuy2 жыл бұрын
All that comm gear would increase the size and weight of the missle. Not to mention significantly increase the cost of something designed to blow up the first time it's used.
@spinningsquare1325 Жыл бұрын
Fox 1 missiles can not get lock mid air because their guidance needs to be in synch with the platform radar unless the missile has datalink. With datalink a fox 1 missile can lock on after launch. R-27ER has that but its completely omited in dcs same as datalink for some reason
@spinningsquare1325 Жыл бұрын
Awacs guiding missiles to the target is not a thing here because the airplane is an old F15C with no datalink aside from that between the eagle and its missiles
@NavyCuda2 жыл бұрын
So when are we going to see you try to do bvr with aim 152s on the a10?!
@mrbagel87512 жыл бұрын
Day 2 of asking for GS to fly the f-4
@keithbriscoe99 Жыл бұрын
Is TWS the best possible choice in this engagement? I guess I thought LRS (long range scan?) is more powerful? But maybe the goal is to avoid alerting the target at lock up.
@sunils63212 жыл бұрын
Hi, Do you have a video of BVR - DCS simulation of F22 vs F35 lighting II? If not can you please upload one? its interesting as both are 5th gen fighters from US and both are stealth, interested in : At what point F35 will detect F22, will AWACS make any difference to F35 capability? Will it be like F22 sneakup behind F35 and come in formation then F35 will be shocked? Will F22 face any difficulty in locating and engaging F35 etc.,
@supersonic62222 жыл бұрын
You should do a video with the AIM 260 or the AIM 120 D
@nigelsmith73662 жыл бұрын
Would the upgraded electronics and radar of the F15ex make for even better results and able to carry more missiles?
@ciprianvalentincipherctv9742 Жыл бұрын
Yes
@deltaforceshuttles37492 жыл бұрын
Role reversal with GS in 1 mig 31 foxbat versus 4 f 15s lol I would like to see that
@hamid.s.zolfagari2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the amazing video. Is it possible to shoot harm anti radar missile to bandit aircraft while he's jamming on our radar?
@crookedwookie87822 жыл бұрын
Like to see the F-22 against a flight of these.
@Hydra_65442 жыл бұрын
MiGs or Eagles
@MississippiKid962 жыл бұрын
👍🏼👆🏼👌🏼🙏🏼 me too.
@BrianTRice772 жыл бұрын
At the range that matters, you’d never get a return from the F-22, though.
@doodooswirl2 жыл бұрын
F-15 w AIM-152 vs F-22 w AIM 260
@crookedwookie87822 жыл бұрын
@@BrianTRice77 return meaning radar return?
@ibd19772 жыл бұрын
Fangs on an Eagle. Where have I heard this before 😋
@dannyreeves47822 жыл бұрын
I’ve always wondered something about the seat in the F-15, behind the pilots head on both sides are two parts that stick out like wings with cylinders on them. What the hell are they for? I know that everything on these planes have a purpose, so what do these do?
@brianmathison24322 жыл бұрын
They are sensors for the ejection seat so when you eject the seat can determine when to separate from the pilot and so on.
@dannyreeves47822 жыл бұрын
@@brianmathison2432 Thanks for taking your time to reply, I honestly couldn’t figure out what those were for.
@brianmathison24322 жыл бұрын
You’re welcome. I was a crew chief on F-15s. They get covered up when the plane is parked on the ground so nothing gets into them.
@krismurphy77112 жыл бұрын
Great tac view explanations.
@alexpaul16652 жыл бұрын
Good fight!! Cool missile, shame, no further development for those missiles. Try the all new aim-260 next time.
@johnhayden64172 жыл бұрын
Great Video and good work. Def "Fangs".
@Gunthrek2 жыл бұрын
Is this the default F-15C? My version doesn't have any voice cues from the computer.
@GrowlingSidewinder2 жыл бұрын
I turned on “radio assists” in the settings. I thought people watching might like it more.
@Gunthrek2 жыл бұрын
@@GrowlingSidewinder Ah, I wasn't aware of that! Thanks!
@car90112 жыл бұрын
We need more A-10 content!
@SuperAirplanemaster2 жыл бұрын
This new 260 BVR is using some of technology from AIM 152
@harrisongilbert2 жыл бұрын
Would be interesting to see a video of an F-15 equipped with the upcoming AIM-260.
@vortex68182 жыл бұрын
We dont even have a confirmed image of the JATM despite it's IOC expected to be 2022. And no, artist's rendering doesnt count as a confirmed image of what it looks like
@harrisongilbert2 жыл бұрын
@@vortex6818 It would be just as inaccurate from reality as scraping together information for the AIM-152. Have some fun with it, speculate.
@toastrecon Жыл бұрын
Can you imagine what that would sound like on the ground? Sonic booms from the aircraft and all of the missiles.
@mihalybalint89692 жыл бұрын
viewer: so... how many missiles are you carrying? F-15: yes
@victorscolari75192 жыл бұрын
We would like to see more missions against air defences or like the fights against Iran like you did some weeks ago over Dubai
@operands2 жыл бұрын
Awesome video 👍
@ernest_oto4952 жыл бұрын
JAS 39 vs the f8 will be a good fight
@boejiden70932 жыл бұрын
Gotta hand it to the soviet engineers for designing such dangerous weapons and aircrafts. Really some smart guys.
@adamketterl2 жыл бұрын
Love the videos! Literally all of them. Thanks for the great content! I was wondering, why not go high to bleed the missiles energy? Wouldn't that make you a more difficult target since it can't drop down on you?
@Greasy__Bear Жыл бұрын
Apparently the air resistance creates more drag than gravity at the speeds those missiles travel at.
@sogerc12 жыл бұрын
Not as spectacular as dogfights but I love these too. Please do a similar video with an F-35 and with an F-22 too.
@MississippiKid962 жыл бұрын
I’ve been wanting to see the f-22 vs a mig 31 thing for a few months now. Every since he posted the first upload having to do with tbe foxhound
@Ilovemyidi6 ай бұрын
For the longest time I thought raytheon made computer parts for gaming 😂
@kapaskapas5232 жыл бұрын
Could we also have a bvr fight from the mig-31 side?
@luongduc91192 жыл бұрын
I don’t think he will
@notHere88012 жыл бұрын
Do more tacview please!! i love understanding strategy
@zahnatom4 ай бұрын
and here you can see the difference between high max range and high effective range
@myslikstepan2 жыл бұрын
At last!!!! Perfect!🎉
@playtime52342 жыл бұрын
What happened to the 2nd lot of four you shot¿
@tqkudzal2 жыл бұрын
To lock multiple targets with the F15C do you just lock each one and thats it?
@ingoos2 жыл бұрын
Climb & crank climb climb climb chaff flare... ? Any difference vs. dive & crank?
@cloudforest40872 жыл бұрын
Can you show us how air dominance is established? Like the importance of owning the skies with superior pilots and aircraft. How would an actual mission play out (both modern or retro). There is just a fascination with fighter jets that makes it interesting.
@sakari94942 жыл бұрын
Good job Raytheon.
@invertedaircraft80632 жыл бұрын
Are the r37 fox 3. The migs don't turn cold very often
@calebleger2 жыл бұрын
How do you get the system to speak to you? I've never heard a missile warning spoken to me, or an audible "shoot" call
@GrowlingSidewinder2 жыл бұрын
It’s a setting in the main settings “radio assists” I think
@rickmaldoo42052 жыл бұрын
Since it's a falcon then its "giving it back its claws" is a more apt description
@Pewerxevil2 жыл бұрын
Hi @Growling Sidewinder I've googled and searched a lot of topics relating to air to air combat... however I became curious about the rwr detecting that a missile was locked on to the aircraft I've watched your videos and noticed that your rwr gives the increased "beeps" when another aircraft is locking onto yours But when a missile is detected, the rwr gives the "whoop whoop" sound. Why and how does this happen? It would seem to me that it would be beneficial for the target to have no warning that a missile is on the way.
@GrowlingSidewinder2 жыл бұрын
Hi you hear the whoop whoop sound when the bandit is using a STT (single target track) or RWS mode (range while search) or when the missile that was fired in TWS (track while scan) goes pitbull.
@ndfgaming68242 жыл бұрын
Have you done a f22 v su57 bvr fight, I know the f22 will wipe the floor with the su57 but in still curious
@pilotbowser99802 жыл бұрын
Use the AIM-152 with the F 22 raptor
@MississippiKid962 жыл бұрын
Why? The eagle already handles em… Wouldn’t it be more interesting to see the raptor use it’s standard fox 3’s ? The result would show whether or not the stealth of the raptor compensates enough to allow the raptor in close enough to kill the foxhound with its standard fox 3’s. Anyone who watched todays video and a little common sense can use deductive reasoning to assume that if a f15 can bag 4 foxhounds with the aim 152, The raptor having stealth, and the same missiles, would make even easier work of the foxhound..
@MississippiKid962 жыл бұрын
Anyone with a brain already knows the outcome…
@smithyMcjoe2 жыл бұрын
Hypersonics I believe are mach 5 and above rather than 6 as the phoenix is considered a hypersonic.