5-0 UNDEFEATED DARK WORLD DECK PROFILE | 1ST PLACE DARK WORLD POST PHOTON HYPERNOVA (FEB 2023)

#darkworld #yugioh #entomazetagaming
My friend ‪@DerKaizer‬ made a max rarity Dark World Deck Profile for me after he won locals! He went 5-0 against meta (forgot which decks lol. Pretty sure it was Spright, Tears, Runick, and some other meta stuff). Haven't tested it against the Kashira match-up though, leave a comment if you've tried the Dark World Kashtira match-up!
Kaiser is kinda the best Dark World player in the world so by default this is the best Dark World deck list to exist!
If you enjoyed this video please like, comment, and subscribe!

[@DerKaizer]

When the world is dark

[@ludovicvandenbussche9054]

Helpful video! Can you please make a video about the combos and gameplay?

[@entomazeta]

I'll try!

[@JFarenci]

There isn't really a Dark World combo line, it's just about keeping your hand actionable while you put more material into play.

[@sasukedarkwolf]

I remember that underworld goddess artwork on thumbnail from pixiv

[@entomazeta]

Lol, based

[@genji4718]

source please

[@PaoloCatcher]

Might be the best DW profile/player yet

[@entomazeta]

Frfr

[@guerlmynunez5265]

Can you make s gameplay of it.?

[@entomazeta]

Yeah

[@guerlmynunez5265]

@@entomazeta but let it be a video with a duel or several duels against decks of the moment. hehe that would be great

[@Galaxy_YT12]

Would it make a difference if u did 1 chupacabra instead of 2

[@DerKaizer]

not that big of a difference, you just have to make sure that you run enough dangers/other discard outlets and its fine. If you're worried just run test hands to make sure you're seeing enough ways to discard your dark worlds

[@rafavizcaino4132]

no handloop? why?

[@DerKaizer]

There is a handloop in the end board, you want to end with silvva in hand to discard off grapha. Just the single silvva effect is usually enough to win you the game. The all in handloop build in my experience is very bad at going 2nd and loses a lot harder to handtraps

[@DerKaizer]

Follow up because I'v been testing a lot, I have been trying a build with 1 ceruli and a 2nd sillva instead of a beiige since making dweller isn't as important and it feels okay right now. Bystials are much less common right now due to kashtira being the best deck, so ceruli/sillva have a decent chance of fully resolving

[@ArcaneTricksterRS]

I still do not understand the point of running level 4s and going into rank 4s. You can just easily go into rank 8s and there are lots of very strong rank 8 XYZ out there.

[@DerKaizer]

Because dugares is super broken and much easier to make than gigantrainer, and the level 4 dangers are much better than the 8s going first. I do play rank 8s but they're negation bodies ,not gigantrainer. Having to get 3 8s on board to fix a bad hand is too inconsistent

[@ArcaneTricksterRS]

@@DerKaizer Rank 8 Negators is exactly what this deck needs though, since it doesn't have in-built opponent's turn play, except the Fusion Grapha. Number 22, Felgrand, Hieratics are all super strong negators with tons of ATK as well to survive.

[@DerKaizer]

@@ArcaneTricksterRS You want to end on grapha with sillva in hand and the fusion spell set, which is a negate and a loop for 2, and I do play rank 8 negators in hope harbinger and photon lord. A pretty common board I make is apolloussa, hope harbinger, and grapha with sillva in hand. You don't need level 8 dangers to make rank 8's anymore, so its better to play the more consistent dangers and then go into the 8s at the end of your turn

[@jeromegreene8957]

You not getting it. You need to turbo through your deck. The dugares and the coach King give you more options to continue combing. Its why people are using them. Yes, people ARE using more rank 8ths but the more important cards are the ones that allow you to turbo. If you seen the videos of people doing test hands and combing, it almost feels like it ca. Go on until you run out of your deck. That is the whole point.

[@DevlishSovereign]

not max rarity lul

[@entomazeta]

What cards aren't?

[@andrewgood7586]

No archives? All these danger players really missing out. I play pure dark world.

[@DerKaizer]

I don't play archives because the deck is built in a way so that you don't end up with a bricked hand. I was playing it in earlier builds but I kept running into times when I had no way to trigger it. It's def better in pure dark world but pure dark world isnt really viable right now due to how fast the game is

[@andrewgood7586]

@@DerKaizer Pure dark world is very viable, and your deck list is not immune to bricking, especially with how many copies of each danger name youre running. One or two snipes and your run ends.

[@andrewgood7586]

@@DerKaizer Ive beaten some of the best decks with pure dark world.

[@andrewgood7586]

@@DerKaizer My favorite thing about danger dark world is how you can spend 10 minutes burning through your entire deck, setting up a board that you think is indestructible only to get it broken by a lava golem or drnm. lol And that’s if you dont get sniped on your first danger or two and just lose anyway. Grapha fusion is much more dangerous in pure dark world though. Without dangers, you can use punishment, puppetry, gates and archives much more consistently, resulting in a major card advantage quickly, and you can slow the game down with negates and control cards. One imperm on the right card will being your opponent down to speed.

[@DerKaizer]

@@andrewgood7586 The dangers I'm maxed out on are the ones I don't mind getting hit on, and the way I play the deck is all about weighing odds. The high danger count is to play through handtraps and to have a chance against kashtira/floodgate decks. Dark world dealings is not a viable option because it draws your opponent into handtraps/ board breakers. If someone did want to put in something like archives I would cut one copy of bigfoot which can feel bad at 2 copies sometimes. I've spent a lot of time optimizing this deck to be consistent and this is what I have ended up on for now. It doesn't play like pure dark world, and it involves a lot of risk consideration and hand sculpting, and has almost no real specific 2 card combos