5. Cognitive Neuroscience Methods II

[@75blackviking]

Thank you MIT for offering this great resource to everyone, free of charge. This is one of those times when the internet lived up to it's original promise. Keep it up!!

[@zhorapata9733]

She is so good! I just love her lectures.its like a great show , just galloping every word. Thanks MIT for sharing these

[@spiritofseventysix1155]

Galloping,i.e. the Galloping Gourmet...🤔😏🙃😉

[@spiritofseventysix1155]

"Galloping" kzbin.info/www/bejne/f6i2q6qNmryLppY

[@VaSavoir2007]

They've only shared 17/26 of them, unlike what Sapolsky has done for his human biology course, That is less than 2/3rds.

[@paccoleong6054]

What a priviledge having access to this! Just being able to view the experiement at 1:07:00 is already priceless. Amazing material. Thank you MIT and Prof. Kanwisher!

[@dominiquedoeslife]

It really IS a privilege. Such great information!

[@franklinbrown5625]

She is a brilliant teacher. I find these MIT lectures so informative.

[@brijeshpoojary4251]

Wow! The experiment during the last few minutes is mind-blowing! I'm hooked to these lectures!

[@Megan-vi5uu]

im obsessed with this series. thank you for making this happen

[@lurkingfriend]

Thank you, Prof. Kanwisher and Mit for this series.

[@allenculbertson8170]

Nancy you are truly an inspiration to me. I really like the energy you put out while teaching your classes. Very amazing 👏 God bless you and thank you 😊 🙏

[@noelplazo3404]

I’m so lucky 🍀 to see this in KZbin for the FREE BRAIN 🧠 lecture from the world 🌎 number 1 university MIT 🙏🏽🇵🇭🇺🇸💙💕

[@descongestionante_nasal]

I loved this class and I'm learning so much! Thanks for sharing this course with us! Prof. Kanwisher is awesome!!!

[@Mehmoodhq]

Watch The Brian documentary, you are going to love it.

[@xmasxray]

I think the fact that an infant first learns to recognize faces means the area is developed much earlier in a particular place in the brain. The intensity of firing means that the brain processes different versions of the face. Recognizing a face should be compared to recognizing things in motion, e.g. the flight of a bird, galloping of a horse, a tree dancing in the wind etc.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Of course also, at 2:50 in the video, with the colored pictures of Julia and Brad and the black and white photos of 2 other people, different receptors in the eye are being utilized and therefore most probably different sets of circuits being utilized in the brain. Seems that should be taken into account as well.

[@angelseye7492]

I simply hope operators of this channel have a wonderful day😇

[@seasnowcai]

OMG, thank you, the first student who asked questions. That’s exactly what I asked in the last video!

[@unbreakablerogue]

Are you kidding me !! Am 48 and coming across this lecture !! The study of Human brain still a mystery , she has the coolest sense of humor ,And Teaches at the same time !! That’s bad ass !!! A well educated instructor! Teacher and god know what else’s !!! Thanks MIT for this !! Am going back to college and having access to this courses and lectures !! And free?? Wow🎟🎟🎧🎧🥈🏄‍♂️🏵🏊🏿‍♀️🤽‍♂️🤽‍♂️🤽‍♂️🤽‍♂️🏵🏵🏵🤽‍♂️🤽‍♂️🏵🏵🏵🤽‍♂️🤽🏿🤽🏿🏵🏵🏵🤽🏿🏵🏵🤽🏿🏵🤽🏿🏵🏵🤽🏿🤹🏻‍♀️🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🏵🤹🏻‍♀️🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🤹🏻‍♀️🏵🤽‍♂️🏵🤽‍♂️🏵🤽‍♂️🤽🏿🏵🤽🏿🤽‍♂️🏵🤽🏿🥇🎖🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🏵🏵🤽🏿🏵🤽🏿🤽🏿🏵🏵🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🏵🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🏵🏵🤽🏿🤽🏿🤽🏿🏵🤽🏿🏵🏵🤽🏿🤽🏿🏵🤽🏿🏵🏵🤽🏿🏵🏵🤽🏿

[@MohamedAshraf-fw1dc]

Dude, 19:20 - she was not kidding when she said that you can be wrong and you just need to work harder to figure out how, i wanted to clap when she discovered that stimulus for testing - how long do scientists dig for that, i don’t know, but god bless em for it

[@fuma9532]

I am appelled: very fascinating subject and an exemplar lecturer! Had my attention the whole time

[@himangshudeka5779]

Thanks for giving us a series like this Hats off to all of you guys

[@henrygingercat]

What a brilliant lecturer. I think I'm in love.

[@borismarinov]

Anyone got her phone?

[@gp10020]

me too, bro

[@nb2028]

It shows that most of us fall for similar traits - honesty, presence, intelligence, vulnerability, humour?

[@emmapelham2847]

This is all just so amazing and I love watching and learning even though I have no background in the subject. My only frustration comes from not being able to hear some of the questions clearly enough. I try to guess what the question must have been from Nancy's answer, but when she just says "Yeah! Absolutely!" I don't stand a chance! 🤣

[@SmartInvestor]

I started to follow these lessons to learn something else from the book I am reading in AI; however, this course might be called face recognition or I don't know if later it will change but due to the attitude of the teacher, that I don't like, I won't watch further. Thanks MIT for the open courses.

[@fredking8438]

I think one of the reasons why facial recognition is harder is because people faces change so much unlike objects and our brain needs a stronger system to process that data ..I guess examples would be like when a poker player is "keeping a straight face" or " a poker face" the cards and other objects don't change and each palyer can't what the other players cards are so they rely on facial expressions ......another example could be football players ..when a player is running and the ball is coming and the go to catch it their eyes get bigger alerting the defender that the ball is coming .. and when they were stimulating that guys brain on objects and he was seeing eyes and noses on them that should prove that that sections is really wired to process eyes and the nose region ...just my thoughts on it

[@ruixingsong9039]

The fact that the Japanese man saw a face overlaid on the kanji and the football is one of the most remarkable things I've ever seen.

[@sixmilestall]

With regard to face recognition and object recognition, I fall back to the premise that the mind is constantly working to evaluate its fitness for survival - long term and immediate, every second of every day. Objects with faces likely pose more immediate possible threats (more common in earlier generations), and the mind is perhaps uniquely coded to handle those immediate threats with quicker computation of faces versus computation of other objects.

[@asdfafafdasfasdfs]

That last experiment was amazing, a bit spooky even.

[@karanbohra9306]

So maybe it's a part which important for face recognition or it's contribute to help to recognise a face and also lead to perception about it And also it I'll posed effect because we have a lot of assumptions and perceptions for our output result This is what I learned from this lecture.. I know I did a lot of mistake or not having that much knowledge about this concept but I enjoyed the lecture a lot

[@TalMinks]

That last video is insane. I wonder if he saw an anime cartoon character because the electrical impulse had the same frequency identification as a character he has stored away. That hypothesis was hinted at in an earlier graph that was shown.

[@srimuharyati2387]

AS A INDONESIAN, THIS IS SOOOO MIND BLOWING

[@savantofillusions]

How did I just watch lectures 4 and 5 back-to-back? IDK but I’m gonna do this. Facial recognition might need L Mode and R Mode simultaneously.

[@dhelmy]

Face inversion effect seems to suggest that there's a special location in the brain for identifying faces , that can't adjust it's glasses when you flip the image. Grotesqueness only seen right side up Everyone has beef with every finding

[@dhelmy]

Behavioural methods: 1. Qualitative general understanding 2. Declutters our understanding of various visual departments of the brain 3. Affordable 4. Relation to brain is secondary, all you get is the output, reaction time and that's it

[@dhelmy]

Just the fact that people have that thing doesn't mean you need it for face recognition, it just shows it activates when you recognise a face. (Cause and effect Buzsaki)

[@microhoarray]

1:09:00 amazing data. and i think its more powerful than any other data because it involves human description. and i don't know if anyone ever thought about this but when saw that guy's reaction all i ever could think of was " schizophrenia". not very special to the face recognition areas not even special to the visionary areas and yet the way he described objects or human faces... in this case they were only stimulating face recognition areas and it kind of horrifying to see things in a different way. what happens if we stimulate other parts of the brain? is that what happens with schizophrenia?

[@GuiPurri]

When the patient was looking at a face and on top of it there was stimulus of the FFA, he saw a cartoonish face. I wonder if we can say that anime-style exaggerates the anatomy, since that brain region was having an intense electric load.

[@DamianReloaded]

I wonder if this part of the brain that seems to be involved in face recognition gets also activated by (social) emotions and language. There is a whole "way of talking" just by glancing at a person and I mean entire conversations between people that know each other. That and bodily language. "Proper Dancing" IMO is probably also interleaved with language.

[@sheinsherman]

wow, that experience!

[@moguzkarakasli]

Vaay be. Leyla ablamız ile beraber çalışmışlar demek. Bu tür şeyler benim gibilere daha çok umut oluyor ah ulan nörobilim sen ne güzel bir alansın...

[@andreafeelsfantastic]

I have developmental prosopagnosia and if I ever need brain surgery for anything I am gonna make sure to call Dr. Kanwisher because if I am in that situation I want SOMEONE to be happy about it 🤣

[@nibussss]

U have to reassess over larger data when judging. At least 5 sessions before judgement. Reject till 5...keep in back of mind I mean It's easy to see what u want to see in the first sessions?

[@Mattt303]

Such an amazing course

[@robertpiazza]

So fascinating

[@jamesduggan7200]

Does it make sense? idk - if you say it does. So, apparently object recognition provides the cognitive basis for determining all thing, including faces, so if object recognition is damaged then facial recognition suffers more because it is more difficult. okay

[@golgumbazguide...4113]

Explore Golgumbaz with Guide Jahangir

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Cause and Effect: Do my gravity test for my theory of everything idea and potentially have the literal theory of everything for this universe. Also, 'if' true, then the 'gem' photon would be it's own self causal effect, and hence eternally existent. It's the interaction with other 'gem' photons whereby other things occur in a cause and effect evolutionary kind of way.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

My email address is on my page. I will post the gravity test and TOE idea after this post. Sometimes it gets posted, sometimes it seems YT blocks the posts. If it shows up, it shows up. If not, some entity blocked you from seeing it for some reason. If you don't see the posts following this one, then email me while I still can be reached.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Here is the test for the 'gravity' portion of my TOE idea. I do not have the necessary resources to do the test but maybe you or someone else reading this does, will do the test, then tell the world what is found out either way. a. Imagine a 12 hour clock. b. Put a magnetic field across from the 3 to 9 o'clock positions. c. Put an electric field across from the 6 to 12 o'clock positions. (The magnetic field and electric field would be 90 degrees to each other and should be polarized so as to complement each other.) d. Direct a high powered laser through the center of the clock at 90 degrees to the em fields. e. Do this with the em fields on and off. (The em fields could be varied in size, strength, density and depth. The intent would be to energy frequency match the laser and em fields for optimal results, cancelling out the em modalities of the laser, thereby leaving behind the gravity modality.) f. Look for any gravitational / anti-gravitational effects. (Including the utilization of ferro cells so as to be able to actually see the energy field movements.) (And note: if done right, it's possible a mini gravitational black hole might form. Be ready for it. In addition, it's possible a neutrino might be formed before the black hole stage, the neutrino being a substance with a very high gravitational modality with very low 'em' modalities.) (An alternative to the above would be to direct 3 high powered lasers, or a single high powered laser split into 3 beams, each adjustable to achieve the above set up, all focused upon a single point in space.) 'If' effects are noted, 'then' further research could be done. 'If' effects are not noted, 'then' my latest TOE idea is wrong. But still, we would know what 'gravity' was not, which is still something in the scientific world. Science still wins either way and moves forward.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Revised TOE: 3/25/2017a. My Current TOE: THE SETUP: 1. Modern science currently recognizes four forces of nature: The strong nuclear force, the weak nuclear force, gravity, and electromagnetism. 2. In school we are taught that with magnetism, opposite polarities attract and like polarities repel. But inside the arc of a large horseshoe magnet it's the other way around, like polarities attract and opposite polarities repel. (I have proved this to myself with magnets and anybody with a large horseshoe magnet and two smaller bar magnets can easily prove this to yourself too. It occurs at the outer end of the inner arc of the horseshoe magnet.). 3. Charged particles have an associated magnetic field with them. 4. Protons and electrons are charged particles and have their associated magnetic fields with them. 5. Photons also have both an electric and a magnetic component to them. FOUR FORCES OF NATURE DOWN INTO TWO: 6. When an electron is in close proximity to the nucleus, it would basically generate a 360 degree spherical magnetic field. 7. Like charged protons would stick together inside of this magnetic field, while simultaneously repelling opposite charged electrons inside this magnetic field, while simultaneously attracting the opposite charged electrons across the inner portion of the electron's moving magnetic field. 8. There are probably no such thing as "gluons" in actual reality. 9. The strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force are probably derivatives of the electro-magnetic field interactions between electrons and protons. 10. The nucleus is probably an electro-magnetic field boundary. 11. Quarks also supposedly have a charge to them and then would also most likely have electro-magnetic fields associated with them, possibly a different arrangement for each of the six different type of quarks. 12. The interactions between the quarks EM forces are how and why protons and neutrons formulate as well as how and why protons and neutrons stay inside of the nucleus and do not just pass through as neutrinos do. THE GEM FORCE INTERACTIONS AND QUANTA: 13. Personally, I currently believe that the directional force in photons is "gravity". It's the force that makes the sine wave of EM energy go from a wide (maximum extension) to a point (minimum extension) of a moving photon and acts 90 degrees to the EM forces which act 90 degrees to each other. When the EM gets to maximum extension, "gravity" flips and EM goes to minimum, then "gravity" flips and goes back to maximum, etc, etc. A stationary photon would pulse from it's maximum extension to a point possibly even too small to detect, then back to maximum, etc, etc. 14. I also believe that a pulsating, swirling singularity (which is basically a pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon) is the energy unit in this universe. 15. When these pulsating, swirling energy units interact with other energy units, they tangle together and can interlock at times. Various shapes (strings, spheres, whatever) might be formed, which then create sub-atomic material, atoms, molecules, and everything in existence in this universe. 16. When the energy units unite and interlock together they would tend to stabilize and vibrate. 17. I believe there is probably a Photonic Theory Of The Atomic Structure. 18. Everything is basically "light" (photons) in a universe entirely filled with "light" (photons). THE MAGNETIC FORCE SPECIFICALLY: 19. When the electron with it's associated magnetic field goes around the proton with it's associated magnetic field, internal and external energy oscillations are set up. 20. When more than one atom is involved, and these energy frequencies align, they add together, specifically the magnetic field frequency. 21. I currently believe that this is where a line of flux originates from, aligned magnetic field frequencies. NOTES: 22. The Earth can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic field, electrical surface field, and gravity, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 23. The flat spiral galaxy can be looked at as being a massive singular interacting photon with it's magnetic fields on each side of the plane of matter, the electrical field along the plane of matter, and gravity being directed towards the galactic center's black hole where the gravitational forces would meet, all three photonic forces all being 90 degrees from each other. 24. As below in the singularity, as above in the galaxy and probably universe as well. 25. I believe there are only two forces of nature, Gravity and EM, (GEM). Due to the stability of the GEM with the energy unit, this is also why the forces of nature haven't evolved by now. Of which with the current theory of understanding, how come the forces of nature haven't evolved by now since the original conditions acting upon the singularity aren't acting upon them like they originally were, billions of years have supposedly elapsed, in a universe that continues to expand and cool, with energy that could not be created nor destroyed would be getting less and less dense? My theory would seem to make more sense if in fact it is really true. I really wonder if it is in fact really true. 26. And the universe would be expanding due to these pulsating and interacting energy units and would also allow galaxies to collide, of which, how could galaxies ever collide if they are all speeding away from each other like is currently taught? DISCLAIMER: 27. As I as well as all of humanity truly do not know what we do not know, the above certainly could be wrong. It would have to be proved or disproved to know for more certainty.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

From a YT conversation I had, this is my part in part (concerning 'cause and effect'): I can clearly see what you are saying about the effect of a cause in itself may be a cause for a later effect. And in that regard, yes it could be seen as being the same. But a 'cause' usually comes before an 'effect'. And in that context, if something never ever changes, the cause brings about an effect (no change) which in itself is a cause (no change) which then brings about an effect (no change),......., and both the cause and effect are identical and no change occurs. But now, if some state of existence changes somewhere in the process, either via a cause that is not identical to the effect or an effect that is not identical to a cause, then change occurs. But for a change to occur that causes some later effect still puts a cause before an effect. One total state of existence changing to bring about another total but different state of existence. Logically speaking, I can't see how one could have a different state of existence (effect) from a previous state of existence that was not identical (cause) to bring about the later different state of existence. And sure, that later effect might possibly be the cause to future effects and so on and so forth and possibly life happens and evolves in a cause/effect/cause/effect.... kind of way. And in essence, 'if' for example my latest theory of everything is really true, that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the basic energy unit of this universe that brings about everything in this universe, including even numbers themselves for math to do what math does, a singular energy unit with 3 different modalities, each modality acting 90 degrees from the other two, while the basic structure of the 'gem' photon itself never changes, it's the interaction with other 'gem' photons in existence whereby other future effects occur in a cause and effect kind of way. And sure, later effects become the cause of later effects and so on and so forth. But the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photons themselves would eternally exist as they themselves make up space and time itself. Eternally the same, but yet interactions with other like 'gem' photons brings about change. (But I fully acknowledge that this TOE idea is dependent upon the results of my gravity test.) But in the context of this discussion, it is a possibility at this time of how reality truly is. In essence, the basic pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon would be both the 'cause' and the 'effect' all contained within itself and in that context, both the 'cause' and 'effect' would be identical. * Added note: The universe ALWAYS existed in some form and did not have a beginning, nor might it ever end. The creation accounts in the Bible and other religion's belief systems, as well as the singular 'big bang' theory, are all just fairy tales. The 'gem' photon would be it's own self causal effect, and hence, eternally existent.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

FOR ME: 'Space' is energy itself. Wherever space is, energy is. Wherever energy is, space is. They are one and the same thing. And for me, the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up everything in existence in this universe. 'Time' is the flow of energy. 'Time' (flow of energy) cannot exist unless 'space' (energy itself) exists. And 'space' (energy itself) that does not flow (no flow of time / energy) is basically useless. An entity cannot even think a thought without a flow of energy. If all the energy in the universe stopped flowing, wouldn't we say that 'time stood still'? Time itself would still exist, it would just not be flowing, (basically 'time' stopped). But then also, how space and time are linked in what is called 'space time', (energy and it's flow). * And everything in existence currently appears to be eternally existent energy interacting with itself.

[@xaviera.honablue8849]

Thanks for this. Very much.

[@lightseeker3100]

Wonderful science , I'm sure no humans or animals were injured in the process. I'm absolutely sure this will be used for the benefit of man kind and not against.

[@NegashAbdu]

ምርጥ ሌክቸር ነዉ ገለቴ!✌️🙏

[@toastyPredicament]

Lord I'm thirsty, give me water ❤

[@not_amanullah]

Thanks 🤍❤️

[@zenbauhaus1345]

im in love!

[@mamichnya]

So, how does difficulty recognizing faces impact the ability to interpret others emotions?

[@mamichnya]

@Pedro Abreu Ta. I'll look for it.

[@sreejithsathyan6998]

My mental representations from behavioral inputs says - she is beautiful

[@nostalgia988]

Her lectures are as beautiful as herself, love U Mam.

[@sanjayvarma-u4e]

amazing

[@ryanbeasley1079]

I’m sure the instructor has considered this possibility, but I have to ask: Are there any cases of individuals with damage to the fusiform face area who still have an average ability to recognize faces? Additionally, I wonder if there is any connection between the fusiform face area and the social areas of the brain. I’d imagine that the region responsible for recognizing a person’s face is linked to regions that are responsible for social cognition and memory, enabling us to tailor our social behaviors accordingly based on memories, opinions, or knowledge we have of that person.

[@Rezin_8]

18:51 knowing an inversion took place, i can see the face.....are my bits scrambled?

[@flipletape9706]

It would be interesting to know if we recognize the faces of our pets the same way as humans we know.

[@jarvis4303]

Probably not because a different part of brain is active when we look at animals

[@flipletape9706]

@@jarvis4303 I was thinking that it might be different than random animals because we don't recognize the faces of random animals. I'm guessing we would recognize the faces of our pets though.

[@flipletape9706]

It might be a useless question though lol

[@jarvis4303]

Could be, and it's definitely not a useless question! But considering how awful we are at recognizing a different race, I doubt we use the same mechanism for animals, even if they are our pets. Would be interesting to see what would happen to a human who has been raised by some animal species, would they have stronger response when seeing that animal's face than humans?

[@keerthivasanb7931]

56:45 -1:00:00 57:45-1:00:00

[@madihatsuzuki1732]

I think that when the researchers stimulated the subject's ffa, his brain tried to look for face traces. I also wonder do ffa gets stimulated when we show subjects images like sockets or cars which looks like faces?

[@Arjunsiva]

awesome it is

[@not_amanullah]

This is helpful 🤍❤️

[@nir0951]

ยานอวกาศ​ ใช้​แรงขับ​เคลื่อน​ ด้วยแรงแม่เหล็ก​ ชาจน์​พลัง​เพิ่ม​ขึ้น​ ด้วย​ไฟฟ้า​

[@pilliozoltan6918]

I did a quick search on phased array EEG, which in theory can give better spatial resolution, and I found some papers about it. Why it's not used more generally?

[@leonkriner3744]

Amazing!

[@HablaGino]

Basically, if you stimulated the specific part of the brain that recognizes faces, would be like a superpower to detect people in a crowd - at least for a couple of seconds, just a guess

[@nibussss]

Can u just remove mother from the equation....to just phone calls...trigerred epilepsy...let it calm and heal...the activity gets rerouted or dissipated...so the areas still damaged...just rerouted...so neuroplasticity...compensates for dysfunctionality.(let's say anger...?)...

[@nibussss]

Meds r more for neuroprotective... But then if the treatment team is anxiety I Didn't have anything at least till 2014. Anxiety causing that pathway to stall in a person who has normal or less than normal face rec. Was he that good before lesion? Hows he living?

[@nibussss]

U have to be sure of recognising faces ...better to doubt than be sure... Intimate thing..like law.... Not the worst thing....

[@etcetera1674]

Would this mean, in order to increase our cognitive ability, exposing ourselves to a culturally diverse environment would be the right call as increasing a face perception database by exposing ourselves to people of different regions of the worlds in turn increases our face perception as we become familiar to a wide variety of faces and hence build up a large set of neural pathways leading to a larger cognitive ability? Could someone confirm this as I'm pretty sure MIT wouldn't reply to this.

[@elginbeloy6205]

Myelination of neural pathways doesn't mean you are smarter in unrelated subjects. So looking for increased "cognitive ability" I feel is a very slippery slope. It's like using an "educational" app like luminosity so you can be better at math. It would be far more effective to just study math and improve the abilities you want to impact than doing roundabout activities like looking at additional people or playing memory games. Why not just study math and mylenate the pathways you care about? TL;DR: I'm not that smart, but my guess is trying to do unrelated tasks to increase your brains capacity in your goal activities (math, memory for piano, etc...) is not as optimal as just engaging in your goal activities and mylenating those pathways.

[@ynwei]

Is Jacob's FFA activated at all when presented with a face?

[@francescacaraballo_]

Can you manipulate that region to see a face?

[@nibussss]

Anxiety? She can say..same thing..but "didn't get u" Maybe he's fed with friends family ..

[@dr.m.h.b4019]

I think with stimulation of that region it generated face like structure, but I don't know that this face is known to subject or not. This is confirmed that this region generate imaginary face. Anyone can clear me regarding this?

[@derpyKAT229]

im here

[@charlesbrightman4237]

Consider also the following: as the Earth's magnetic field weakens, currently projected to be at it's weakest around 2035, allowing more harmful cosmic radiation to reach the surface of this Earth, and species upon the surface of this Earth, including their brain, especially during strong solar storms, could potentially have negative effects on a species' body and brain. U/V C, which is normally not seen on the surface of this Earth is already being reported as being seen on the surface of this Earth. U/V C being what some hospitals utilize to sterilize some of their equipment with.

[@nibussss]

The patients does it in last resort... His desperation as well.. But clearly..? The rule is sacrifice science for person as hard as it may be.?

[@nehasworld861]

Good video

[@pulkityogi-jf1xk]

is it possible 🤔

[@VaSavoir2007]

Where is the other video Nancy announces at the end?

[@mitocw]

We don’t know if she ran out of time or it was only partially shown in class, but this is the video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/rKimo6ulorWVqrs. Best wishes on your studies!

[@Hanna_Bakhash]

1:05:47 face hallucination 🍄

[@poko1030]

5:27 Is the framework

[@tainamsilva5065]

Where is n° 3?

[@mintusaren895]

Amar Laban ar acidity. Dutoi achhe. Amlo vs khar.

[@johnnycmajor]

How is Bob doing?

[@nir0951]

พลังงาน​ ควอน​ทัม​

[@nibussss]

Also the eagerness to help....can be ..

[@say2577]

VEEEEEERY LOW resolution data. I can definetly make better. Is that data from Japan reproduced for other subjects?

[@vidalskyociosen3326]

What is this lecture exactly ? Uploaded year 2021, but what year it was made?

[@mitocw]

This lecture is on methods in cognitive neuroscience. As the title slate and description states, it was recorded in the spring of 2019. For more info and materials, see the course on MIT OpenCourseWare at: ocw.mit.edu/9-13S19. Best wishes on your studies!

[@nibussss]

I think consistency in Personality..or principles is good...like I stick to less manipulation of face look.. Full natural.....like i look for functionality only...time saves....as a uni kid I used gel and stuff....teenagers... Although I got tranquilized after 19 ..i wake up once in a while ....u also learn ..maturity.... Then...the commonality of being natural holds . Most of it is to trick to partner... Ppl see thru tricks.... Maybe short time..gain? So i go natural. Hygenic scientifically....is good lookjng enuf Plus depending in sleep....Incan be handsome or ugly...freshhh

[@nibussss]

Malayalam movies..... psychology

[@nibussss]

It's something we do out of desperation..maybe not be happy about it?...

[@nibussss]

Different species...won't understand me...enemy... press...

[@thalpha5148]

I am only watching this because of the professor. Cachowww👉👍💥

[@streetographer]

I wonder if this is connected to seeing faces in inanimate objects. I see faces in things (that don’t really have faces) all the time. Yet I know this is the case.

[@fastacelzapacescu5445]

🍀🍀🍀

[@htwa]

in terms of neuroscience, I feel that facial recognition is probably one of the less interesting topics to talk about. you kind of just see faces and remember them. am I wrong ?

[@walterneta3679]

I am enjoying and learning from the professor's presentation, however, I am wonder, when she holds her hands and rubs them together high on her chest, if she is an evil genius planning to take over the world, cold, or has a deal we cannot refuse!

[@nibussss]

Connecting to sex..isn't fair.. Food, shelter, health, Maybe solving actual health issue is a big factor of brain health...

[@Halalmode_501]

52:17

[@ilya4759]

If I was God, and I wanted people to recognize faces in the most detailed and efficient way possible, I would have all people gradually construct a super-detailed image of an *average* face (or maybe a few) and only process the deltas detected.

[@umutercan3074]

Is testing people with upside down images a good testing method? And if it is how it can give us a clear conclusion? Because human brain is not seeing the faces upside down for the whole life and maybe learning the shape in that way. What I mean is the learning process in this experiment does not start from the beginning of the experiment but from the birth.