5 Countries That ALMOST Existed

  Рет қаралды 355,603

ibx2cat

ibx2cat

Күн бұрын

Countries, but not quite
/ toycat - Subreddit community!
Want to know what I use for my recording/gaming setup? www.amazon.com/shop/ibxtoycat
Check out my main channel at / ibxtoycat
Also on twitter @ibxtoycat

Пікірлер: 855
@hemmper
@hemmper 4 жыл бұрын
20:08 In a survey the French even saw themselves as being the most arrogant country in the world. So that's another level of arrogant, knowing you are and not trying to change.
@SilvanaDil
@SilvanaDil 4 жыл бұрын
True, although a more recent poll showed that Indians have the biggest disconnect between how "great" they think their country is versus the reality.
@Iramico
@Iramico 4 жыл бұрын
hemmper well it makes sense .. their symbol is the rooster, the only animal that stands proud even when standing in shit .. at least that’s what one of my (French) teachers used to say
@SilvanaDil
@SilvanaDil 4 жыл бұрын
@@Iramico - LOL! (My French teacher had a rather large ... bosom. Her nickname: Madame Beaucoup de Balcon)
@SuperSMT
@SuperSMT 4 жыл бұрын
They're now in a month-and-a-half long strike because they want to be able to retire at 52... even after already having some of the best workers rights / conditions in the world
@Felishamois
@Felishamois 4 жыл бұрын
@@SuperSMT 62. It's 62.
@ayuyu4904
@ayuyu4904 4 жыл бұрын
*Burundi exists* Toycat: "Burundi just exists"
@jacobhogan3208
@jacobhogan3208 4 жыл бұрын
I had to do a school project years ago on Burundi so it holds a place in my heart.
@stephen9381
@stephen9381 4 жыл бұрын
Jacob Hogan my relationship with Malawi be like: “a fellow soldier”
@retf8977
@retf8977 4 жыл бұрын
@@stephen9381 I have a Malawi shaped hole in my Malawi shaped heart... Iove Malawi for some odd reason
@legendmk52
@legendmk52 4 жыл бұрын
It's nice to see that other people love countries for not much of a reason. I like East Timor like that.
@UnitedKingdomOfAmerica
@UnitedKingdomOfAmerica 4 жыл бұрын
I like Hungary because it's one of my ancestry countries
@edgelord8337
@edgelord8337 4 жыл бұрын
The sultan of Oman lives in Zanzibar now. That's just where he lives.
@ivandjurdjevic7463
@ivandjurdjevic7463 4 жыл бұрын
meta jay 404 r/commedycemetery
@MoonLab_Gaming
@MoonLab_Gaming 4 жыл бұрын
*History of the entire world I guess*
@tipsgamez4447
@tipsgamez4447 4 жыл бұрын
Maybe he discovered it when looking for another way to India...
@titanfallsvlogs4898
@titanfallsvlogs4898 4 жыл бұрын
*i guess we’ll have to find a new wat to india*
@Pugaroo85
@Pugaroo85 4 жыл бұрын
r/unexpectedbillwurtz
@TheAttmaster9
@TheAttmaster9 4 жыл бұрын
BoganVille, new holiday destination for the aussies
@olympicegg6853
@olympicegg6853 4 жыл бұрын
Bruh
@jeremyaugustine2838
@jeremyaugustine2838 2 жыл бұрын
Is it just me, or will that be the first country to have ville in its name?
@senhordoutorprofessormestr8629
@senhordoutorprofessormestr8629 2 жыл бұрын
Bougainville
@commemorative
@commemorative 2 жыл бұрын
@@jeremyaugustine2838 Not sure it will be named after the island though
@just_some_guy_innit
@just_some_guy_innit 2 жыл бұрын
LMAOOOOOOO
@freehandclara4015
@freehandclara4015 4 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Simon Bolivar (South American independence leader in the 19th century) wanted there to be a United States equivalent in South America
@Batcow-1138
@Batcow-1138 4 жыл бұрын
With The countries of Venezuela Colombia Ecuador and Panama, thats why all except for Panama have similar flags nowdays
@sammybeaver9130
@sammybeaver9130 3 жыл бұрын
Brazil: Yes I know they are talking about the whole continent not just one country
@AlejandroRodolfoMendez
@AlejandroRodolfoMendez 3 жыл бұрын
Basically José de San Martin say that he shouldn't be a big douche, so that's why there's a statue of him in New York. Basically Argentina kinda do that but give the chance to each part of the colonies to be their thing or join, instead Bolívar wanted a big giant thing and be on charge.
@misterixray2251
@misterixray2251 2 жыл бұрын
Think at the national team of football 🤤 (MSN)
@EpicB
@EpicB 2 жыл бұрын
Well, there was Gran Colombia. There was also the Federal Republic of Central America.
@dudamonas2450
@dudamonas2450 4 жыл бұрын
One word for this channel: Underrated
@raxu3660
@raxu3660 4 жыл бұрын
ok
@mynameiswalterhartwellwhite420
@mynameiswalterhartwellwhite420 4 жыл бұрын
@@raxu3660 no u
@HOVANA
@HOVANA 4 жыл бұрын
He has another channel which is much bigger
@dudamonas2450
@dudamonas2450 4 жыл бұрын
I’m not talking about he’s first channel
@rakhatthenut3815
@rakhatthenut3815 4 жыл бұрын
@@HOVANA namely THIS channel is underrated, not first
@Synthetica9
@Synthetica9 4 жыл бұрын
That jab at Burundi tho
@theodo3655
@theodo3655 4 жыл бұрын
Hahahhaa truee
@_Abjuranax_
@_Abjuranax_ 4 жыл бұрын
The main problem with slavery and the Confederacy in the US is once you have a tiger by the tail, it is very hard to just let go without some very serious repercussions. Conflict over Slavery was almost guaranteed as soon as the Constitution was ratified, and every single US President up until Lincoln, did not want to be the one in office when the Civil War erupted.
@jeremiahblake3949
@jeremiahblake3949 2 жыл бұрын
Lincoln didn't want ro be the guy who oversaw the war either which is why he took almost 2 years to propose ending slavery in the territories STILL REBELLING, it wasn't until the end of his term that he began moving for full abolition, ie once the war had been well won.
@BeyondtheBlade
@BeyondtheBlade Жыл бұрын
@@jeremiahblake3949 Well, lets not forgett Lincoln didn't even finish the civil war because he, uh, got shot in the back of the head. But furthermore, while it is said it was over 'states rights' even that is a blantent half truth: The civil war did not start because the north tried to fight slavery or anything. Rather, is was due to the fact that the south was attempting to expand slavery and, and the north, realizing this would put them at a political disadvantage, said no. After that, the south literally started taking forts before open war had even been declared. It is VERY safe to say the south fired the first shots in the civil war in nearly all accounts.
@jeremiahblake3949
@jeremiahblake3949 Жыл бұрын
@@BeyondtheBlade of course the South started the war. And it was about the states right to safeguard slavery which they thought the North would end once free states were the majority. My point is that it was likely an overreaction since even the abolitionist president didn't immediately end slavery when the war started
@frankskynyrd
@frankskynyrd 11 ай бұрын
@@jeremiahblake3949 I mean we don't have slavery in the US anymore so it probably wasn't an overreaction. Not condoning their actions, just disagree that they overreacted to political/social events. I mean, they were kinda right in their fear that the US government would end slavery cause it did.
@lefrancoisvincent9429
@lefrancoisvincent9429 3 жыл бұрын
Just remember 1995, Québec independence was WAY closer than any of those one, check Wikipedia on how it came close to becoming a country, even France was willing to recognize the independence😇
@beu9245
@beu9245 3 жыл бұрын
It really shouldn't say: 'Even France' it should day: 'ESPECIALLY FRANCE'
@internetperson9813
@internetperson9813 2 жыл бұрын
@@beu9245 But to be fair getting recognized by one of the Security Council countries is a BIG DEAL
@Unknown.Stonks
@Unknown.Stonks 2 жыл бұрын
True
@lbgamer24
@lbgamer24 2 жыл бұрын
50.6 to 49.4 or something like that
@fel24thecat
@fel24thecat 2 жыл бұрын
If Canada didn’t do shady things like spending much more money than allowed Quebec would be Independent today…I’m sad
@cearnold
@cearnold 3 жыл бұрын
whenever I watch one of these videos I end up with 15 wikipedia tabs open and a google maps tab open to a weird region of the world
@agent_bedrock5844
@agent_bedrock5844 2 жыл бұрын
I never noticed Switzerland is keeping their long running record of neutrality going not joining the EU
@endthisnonsense7202
@endthisnonsense7202 2 жыл бұрын
They are voluntarily part of the EU suburbs, the EEA, meaning the have to comply just as a normal EU member, but don't have the veto on regulations that normal members have. It is membership without the sovereignty that comes with real membership, sort of being colonized by choice. There is a lot of unease about that with Swiss citizens who actually understand full membership compared to EEA brings more sovereignty.
@frozenpea1848
@frozenpea1848 4 жыл бұрын
19:53 ,, They're like our closest neighbor ." Ireland: Am I a joke to you?
@cianmurtagh468
@cianmurtagh468 4 жыл бұрын
shhhh the more british people consider ulster irish the quicker we end up uniting.....
@Inseut
@Inseut 4 жыл бұрын
Toycat hates northern Ireland confirmed 😔
@brixriverfilms
@brixriverfilms 2 жыл бұрын
Don't you get the British? They hate Ireland because they know they can't take control of it.
@lukedetering4490
@lukedetering4490 4 жыл бұрын
4:10 I'm no Confederate supporter, but I wouldn't say they were destined to lose. They had some smart generals and could overcome to barriers of being less industrialized. Had Lincoln not be as smart about his hiring and firing decisions and not utilized his technology like telegraphs and railroads correctly, the south could have made the civil war longer or even won independence.
@parrytheplaguedoc
@parrytheplaguedoc 4 жыл бұрын
Also if Lincoln didn’t make the war about saving slaves some time in the war, the European powers would’ve joined the CSA in the war.
@tiaspalace6475
@tiaspalace6475 3 жыл бұрын
Also if the confederates had better manpower and more supplies. They would have probably taken Washington. They got very close during the battle of Gettysburg.
@thaddeuskyle572
@thaddeuskyle572 2 жыл бұрын
It could honestly be argued that the South lost as soon as they lost New Orleans in 1862, or at least lost in the west with that.
@carlosandleon
@carlosandleon 2 жыл бұрын
Basically if the winner didn't do the things they did to make them win, they would have lost? Imagine my shock!
@guppy719
@guppy719 2 жыл бұрын
The North had a much bigger population and was industrialized it was pretty much always going to win. The North really fucked up a lot of the early civil war with bad leadership. The Only way the south wins is with intervention form another country.
@SaxandRelax
@SaxandRelax 3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: Even though arabic is technically on language, people from saudi arabia can't understand people from algeria and morocco
@Thedimensionalwarrior
@Thedimensionalwarrior 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah but at least we all know how to speak formal arabic
@SaxandRelax
@SaxandRelax 2 жыл бұрын
@@Thedimensionalwarrior ofc
@Mlmylji
@Mlmylji 2 жыл бұрын
As a saudi, can confirm 🤣
@TurtleMarcus
@TurtleMarcus 2 жыл бұрын
I remember during the 2015 New Zealand flag referendum, everybody thought it was a huge waste of time and money, and a poll showed that more people were willing to discuss New Zealand becoming part of Australia, than were willing to discuss getting a new flag. So someday there might be the Commonwealth of Australasia.
@chienbanane3168
@chienbanane3168 2 жыл бұрын
New Zealand should join Austria instead, that'll show them
@Random_UserName4269
@Random_UserName4269 Жыл бұрын
@@chienbanane3168 Then finally unite the Kingdom of Australia-Hungary
@AmandaHugandKiss411
@AmandaHugandKiss411 Жыл бұрын
@@Random_UserName4269 that made my day 🤣🤣🤣
@teaarmo
@teaarmo 4 жыл бұрын
Hello, thought I'd let you know. I found this channel in the last couple weeks and it's since become one of my favourite channels. I've been binging through the entire channel. Keep up the great work, happy I've found it
@dudamonas2450
@dudamonas2450 4 жыл бұрын
Me too
@lmiartegtra9412
@lmiartegtra9412 4 жыл бұрын
United Arab empire: is no Toycat: is yes
@mikerplaysyt
@mikerplaysyt 3 жыл бұрын
Toycat is always yes
@badryaalamri3627
@badryaalamri3627 3 жыл бұрын
Toycat is no cuz he is a bad kommiekat
@ananttiwari1337
@ananttiwari1337 2 жыл бұрын
@@badryaalamri3627 You are no
@escapefr0mslender
@escapefr0mslender 2 жыл бұрын
@@badryaalamri3627 really!!!
@MarkDDG
@MarkDDG 4 жыл бұрын
The Coat of arms of the Netherlands also has French on it. And our passport is in English, Dutch and French as well.
@schuwi4
@schuwi4 3 жыл бұрын
You make geography soo interesting. All those little tid-bits of information about different countries makes me realize how diverse a place the world actually is.
@Alex-wg9bi
@Alex-wg9bi 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you youtube for recommending this channel! Idk why but I love all of these geography videos. Can you do one on overseas dependencies/Caribbean constituencies of European countries? There are soo many little islands and it's all so confusing yet interesting. Keep up the great work toycat!
@Jotari
@Jotari 4 жыл бұрын
"It's seven people" Shows a picture of eight people.
@graeme011
@graeme011 3 жыл бұрын
In a picture of eight people, surely it is undeniable that there are (at least) seven people in the photograph. Besides, one of them could be an alien.
@Jotari
@Jotari 3 жыл бұрын
@@graeme011 Well if there's a possibility that two of them are aliens then it's not quite undeniable that there's at least seven people.
@thyse35
@thyse35 3 жыл бұрын
Those are giants and the people are to small to be seen
@pinguim2870
@pinguim2870 4 жыл бұрын
You could have mentioned how the south of Brazil (at the time, Brazilian Empire) actually became independent and started the "war of the Farrapos" (Guerra dos Farrapos), essencially like an American civil war.
@Inseut
@Inseut 4 жыл бұрын
Yes. It's way more real than California independent 😂 Mas que barbaridade, tchê
@Inseut
@Inseut 4 жыл бұрын
To be fair, Riograndense Republic got to be de facto independent from Brazil for some time, it was just unrecognized
@RedPandaStan
@RedPandaStan 4 жыл бұрын
I have no idea why you keep on mentioning california for independence. The movement never really gained any support out of slight media buzz.
@awesallemtheking2583
@awesallemtheking2583 4 жыл бұрын
I'm kinda uncomfortable with his strong knowledge of the u.s by 4 mins in
@retf8977
@retf8977 4 жыл бұрын
Long live the cali republic
@riyadhmohamedain4522
@riyadhmohamedain4522 4 жыл бұрын
yeah exactly, no one actually took the California independence thing seriously, California is a huge part of American identity no matter how different it might be from the other 49 states
@macekane
@macekane 4 жыл бұрын
Also, with the US constitution in the mix and revoking citizenship to those who vote no would never fly with the US.
@paigey-poo4235
@paigey-poo4235 4 жыл бұрын
It’s on their state flag and everything. They were really going for for a while. Now everyone just brings it up every few years.
@greengreen110
@greengreen110 4 жыл бұрын
"things that have hapened in the last 100 years" * moves mouse over germany *
@brixriverfilms
@brixriverfilms 2 жыл бұрын
lol
@adamjackal
@adamjackal 2 жыл бұрын
0:51 i love how he says another one instead of just One. it’s little unique things like that which i notice and appreciate.
@SonOfMuta
@SonOfMuta 4 жыл бұрын
"There WILL be an independent Bougainville" Not necessarily. If Papa New Guinea doesn't want to let them go, they won't.
@jacktadema1692
@jacktadema1692 4 жыл бұрын
The UN will most likely intervene if they try to stop it, like they did with East Timor.
@harsimaja9517
@harsimaja9517 4 жыл бұрын
They have formally agreed to honour the result. If they don’t the UN would step in.
@eyesup4156
@eyesup4156 3 жыл бұрын
@@harsimaja9517 the UN are a joke. What would they do
@ancsuther
@ancsuther 3 жыл бұрын
@@eyesup4156 not related, but the UN wasn't made to stop all wars, it was to keep peace, not peace enforce
@eyesup4156
@eyesup4156 3 жыл бұрын
@@ancsuther Yes I know. That's precisely why it is a joke
@zubairskazi
@zubairskazi 2 жыл бұрын
i really enjoy this channel. your main channel i haven't seen.
@natebrownlee11
@natebrownlee11 4 жыл бұрын
Yo toycat love ur vids keep making these
@minhee7
@minhee7 4 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget Canada in 1995 The 1995 Quebec independence referendum was the second referendum to ask voters in the Canadian-French-speaking province of Quebec whether Quebec should proclaim national sovereignty and become an independent country, with the condition precedent of offering a political and economic agreement to Canada. 93.52% of the 5,087,009 registered Quebecers voted in the referendum, a higher turnout than any provincial or federal election in Canada's history. The proposal of June 12, 1995 was rejected by voters, with 50.58% voting "No" and 49.42% voting "Yes".
@joelfortin6634
@joelfortin6634 4 жыл бұрын
This. I'm still salty
@inactive6200
@inactive6200 4 жыл бұрын
Portgas D. MinHee that’s a bruh moment if I ever see one
@johnwhead3476
@johnwhead3476 4 жыл бұрын
This is quality content i love it
@notayoutuber3518
@notayoutuber3518 2 жыл бұрын
Astounding video as always
@The_Alt_Vault
@The_Alt_Vault 4 жыл бұрын
What about the imperial federation, Intermarium or the Kalmar Union
@SilvanaDil
@SilvanaDil 4 жыл бұрын
Likelihood of some you mentioned: ind. Scotland (medium); ind. Catalonia (medium); one or more ind. Canadian provinces (low, but rising); one or more U.S. ind. states (almost zero).
@naa5972
@naa5972 4 жыл бұрын
Quebec is possible but another canadian provinces? how?
@SilvanaDil
@SilvanaDil 4 жыл бұрын
@@naa5972 - Alberta & Sas aren't too happy these days; Trudeau's party doesn't have a single MP from either one.
@lycian123
@lycian123 4 жыл бұрын
i live in Spain and all the media outside Catalonia report that it is most definitely not likely to become independent in the short or medium term. The politicians who attempted a breakaway were convicted in abstentia. The rest of Spain will not allow the region to separate.
@naa5972
@naa5972 4 жыл бұрын
@@lycian123 Why aren't they allowing catalonia to secede???? Isn't that just colonialism at this point
@tannerwilson4843
@tannerwilson4843 4 жыл бұрын
SilvanaDil I would put 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 high.
@yourmother9834
@yourmother9834 4 жыл бұрын
Yay! 😍 a new toycat video!
@nathanwinter863
@nathanwinter863 2 жыл бұрын
Would be cool to see another video like that
@kingalex105x7
@kingalex105x7 4 жыл бұрын
This video does a good job of being different from most videos of its kind
@pepp418
@pepp418 4 жыл бұрын
"France, our closest neighbour. Closest ally." Ireland: *Cries in post-unionism*
@TAILSORANGEs
@TAILSORANGEs 4 жыл бұрын
Empire of Toycat: Fantastique.
@shivamdatta4380
@shivamdatta4380 4 жыл бұрын
Love these videos
@CommanderOfChicken
@CommanderOfChicken 4 жыл бұрын
0:07 fond memories of playing Malaysia on the NES.
@jakerocknic5918
@jakerocknic5918 3 жыл бұрын
Bougainville has an interesting language called Rotokas, (just thought I'd mention it)
@tealmer3528
@tealmer3528 4 жыл бұрын
16:40 and uh Burundi exists
@kairon156
@kairon156 4 жыл бұрын
I don't recall if you talked about this but sense Canada's most recent election there's gossip about western Canada breaking off which may cause a snowball effect with Quebec leaving and possibly Newfoundland too because Newfoundland had 3 options after WW2 and ended up joining Canada.
@clancywoods7728
@clancywoods7728 3 жыл бұрын
Arabia: Unites Israel: **Laughs** I'm in danger
@brixriverfilms
@brixriverfilms 2 жыл бұрын
Israel: *Sigh* Here we go again...
@cheezychad8474
@cheezychad8474 2 жыл бұрын
It's actually very sad because a lot of Arab countries are now supporting Israel, so the hope of the Arab countries uniting to eliminate the neo-settler colonial state of Israel is gone.
@3506Dodge
@3506Dodge 3 жыл бұрын
To equate California's discontents with the U.S. and secession movements elsewhere is ludicrous.
@guppy719
@guppy719 2 жыл бұрын
There are no real secessionist movements at least in the actual states. Texas and California are memes and the Native Hawaiians who actually want sovereignty make up like 10% of the Islands population even if they all agreed.
@maherhamadouch2005
@maherhamadouch2005 4 жыл бұрын
Why can't Africa be one country? *Gaddafi enters chat* *Malcolm X enters chat*
@edgelord8337
@edgelord8337 4 жыл бұрын
Malcolm X had nothing to do with Africa and Gaddafi wanted to be king of Africa.
@maherhamadouch2005
@maherhamadouch2005 4 жыл бұрын
@@edgelord8337 Malcolm had everything to do with Africa, and Gaddafi was a Ba'athist, we are Socialist Republicans
@rct3LP
@rct3LP 4 жыл бұрын
The same reason why Europe can’t be one country
@Rookspl
@Rookspl 4 жыл бұрын
rct3LP Europe can’t unite because of ideology Africa however is different with Culture being the reason Edit: what i meant by different is the difference of reason why they cant unite
@rct3LP
@rct3LP 4 жыл бұрын
KirbyFan3210 - and also thousands of different languages
@mr.offensive5185
@mr.offensive5185 2 жыл бұрын
This guy used to play Minecraft is now teaching geography stuff, great man
@chefzand6607
@chefzand6607 4 жыл бұрын
I visited Nairobi back in 2018 and it seemed like there was a lot of Chinese influence and investment in Eastern Africa
@VitorEmanuelOliver
@VitorEmanuelOliver 2 жыл бұрын
It must have taken a long time to complete this map, did you use the elyktra?
@joshmiddlebrook239
@joshmiddlebrook239 4 жыл бұрын
Speaking of the confederacy, fun fact: Robert E. Lee was actually related to George Washington. His wife was the great-granddaughter of Martha Washington, George Washington's wife.
@unifiedhorizons2663
@unifiedhorizons2663 3 жыл бұрын
damn our founder was grandson couldn’t win a rebelling
@alahiri2002
@alahiri2002 Жыл бұрын
By your own words, that doesn’t make him related to George Washington. Only his wife would be related to George Washington (assuming he was the father of the line of children that Robert E. Lee’s wife supposedly descends from). There is a stark difference between having a distant family member and being related by blood.
@neoncherry6698
@neoncherry6698 9 ай бұрын
The rumor is that not only was the USSR against Yugoslavia expanding, but that the West was also very much against it. Some believe this was the main reason why the merger between Yugoslavia and Bulgaria specifically didn't happen.
@megposting
@megposting 2 жыл бұрын
14:45 tbh as an albanian-american i wouldn't say albania was basically a puppet state, albania had varied foreign relations during its time as communist. they were allied with the ussr, but in the late 50's albanian dictator enver hoxha pretty much decided that khrushchev wasn't a real communist and just a revisionist, so they split with the ussr. albania then allied with china, but hoxha ended up thinking china was too accepting to the west and split with them too, pretty much leaving albania all alone until they got rid of communism in the 90's.
@phs125
@phs125 2 жыл бұрын
Fun fact : there are some concepts of uniting india more than it is now, and some more about dividing it into further pieces. "Akhand Bharat" is a concept of combining all the countries that were the same country in ancient world, like, india, pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, srilanka, Myanmar, Bhutan etc. And there are Independence movements to make tamilnadu a seperate country, Kerala a seperate socialist country, making a seperate country for entire south india called "Dravida Nadu" Punjab and surrounding states want to make a seperate country called "Khalistan" for Sikhs, Sikkim wants to be seperate, bengal wants to be united as a seperate country combined with Bangladesh, kashmir wants a seperate country etc...
@Hananmarwah
@Hananmarwah 2 жыл бұрын
NepL srinlanka Myanmar was never part of india. Nepal was independent when india was under British rule
@phs125
@phs125 2 жыл бұрын
@@Hananmarwah with that definition, India with current borders was never under the control of a single ruler. Almost all of India was under a single ruler during mourya. Gupta, rashtrakuta, moghals, Shivaji, and British. Nepal was part of many Indian kingdoms, srilanka was part of Tamil kingdoms, Myanmar was also under control of various indian kings, and even British.
@arabana4085
@arabana4085 2 жыл бұрын
For some reason I always get recommended his second channel videos and not his main channel.
@bosheek8632
@bosheek8632 4 жыл бұрын
Any chance of doing a Video of possible countries that could merge.
@kidleprechaun1018
@kidleprechaun1018 3 жыл бұрын
i actually met the us ambassador to the un and the way she talked about her work sounded like she was the leader of a country
@theamazingcj2748
@theamazingcj2748 2 жыл бұрын
How did I not find this channel until now?
@alexanderkono6369
@alexanderkono6369 3 жыл бұрын
"All Arab countries speak the same language", I mean, technically yes, but also no.......
@_Lunare_
@_Lunare_ 2 жыл бұрын
Just speak fusha lol
@XenMNex
@XenMNex 4 жыл бұрын
u should do a video on 5 "countrys" that want to exist like Seborga
@cloverliepa2491
@cloverliepa2491 4 жыл бұрын
I clicked this video not even realizing this was your second channel. I was like: why no minecra- oooooooooh
@phantompig
@phantompig 4 жыл бұрын
The green screen makes the map part of your shirt
@pepsifan5330
@pepsifan5330 4 жыл бұрын
epic win thank u andrew
@shuggothgt2071
@shuggothgt2071 2 жыл бұрын
My home was ALMOST a country, the United Nations just failed to recognize me :(
@rustyshackleford234
@rustyshackleford234 10 ай бұрын
Molossia?
@mjouwbuis
@mjouwbuis 3 жыл бұрын
To be fair, lingua franca is an Italian word for the language of the Franks (overlapping but not equal to France), and modern English also borrows heavily from Latin (Franks' language vs lingua Franca doesn't sound entirey alien).
@Skye_At_Home
@Skye_At_Home 4 жыл бұрын
98%... If only 98% of the world could agree on everything.
@lewisblackwiththenicehair
@lewisblackwiththenicehair 4 жыл бұрын
There's actually a party started recently to separate the north and south of England. NEIP (Northern England Independence Party) if anyone's interested. It's come around because the British politics is so South centric and I think it's a great idea
@niensaddestofthesad8151
@niensaddestofthesad8151 4 жыл бұрын
I am from the south of England and i do think the north and the Midlands sucks but England is stronger United both halves need eachother im sorry your area sucks like a 3rd world Welsh town
@lewisblackwiththenicehair
@lewisblackwiththenicehair 4 жыл бұрын
@@niensaddestofthesad8151 England, in my opinion, is stronger when the entire country is looked after, as oppose to just London, Kent and Essex being looked after, because the politicians live there. Not that I can hold them entirely responsible, I'm sure they see the problems further South more because they're based their, as I'm sure I do in the North, but if the North and South both raise their own money and attend to their own problems, I feel it works out better and fairer for all parties really
@jwadaow
@jwadaow 4 жыл бұрын
​@@lewisblackwiththenicehair Places are better when the people look after themselves and don't look to politicians. The North didn't move out of raw materials because London softened the blow, it needs businesses to take advantage of the lower wages and for government not to get in the way.
@lewisblackwiththenicehair
@lewisblackwiththenicehair 4 жыл бұрын
@@jwadaow I believe they're looking to put a 0.5% increase on large corporations while reducing it for small and medium businesses
@SomasAcademy
@SomasAcademy 4 жыл бұрын
~17:25 Australia technically IS a continent, though the continent of Australia includes the country of Australia, the Island of New Guinea, and the islands in between, not just the country. Oceania is not a continent, but is rather a geographic region which includes the continent of Australia and a number of surrounding islands. I know, stupid, but that's the way we officially break things down in the Anglosphere.
@tealkerberus748
@tealkerberus748 4 жыл бұрын
Soma Hanikeri the continental plate of Australia also includes India. But I don't think that stops us being a continent in our own right. There's a lot of sea bed between us and them!
@SomasAcademy
@SomasAcademy 4 жыл бұрын
@@tealkerberus748 Actually India is on its own plate. The Australian plate only includes Australia, New Guinea, the north island and part of the South Island of New Zealand, and the smaller islands in between those landmasses. You are right that tectonic plates don't define continents, though; Europe and Asia are considered different continents, but they mostly share a plate, and India and Arabia are each on their own plates, but are considered part of Asia.
@paranoidrodent
@paranoidrodent 4 жыл бұрын
As a Canadian who watches and reads both French and English media and has no dog in the race, I can safely say that the British obsession with slagging France and seeing it as a rival isn't really mutual and hasn't been aside from the Anglo-Norman period and parts of the colonial era. British media (including KZbinrs) constantly slag the French while French media ignores the UK for the most part. It's glaringly one-sided and the only ones who seem to think this rivalry exists are Brits. The whole thing is so weird when viewing both sides. The French distrust the British (the perfidious Albion trope) but they spent long centuries focused on German-speaking powers (Austria, Prussia and especially the unified Germany). Britain was a threat to colonial possessions but it alone hasn't been a threat to mainland France since the 14th century. The Germans have been viewed as France's real concern for centuries. Today, you'll hear French political types and media bemoan Anglo-Saxon influence on culture and the world stage and such but they really mean the broader English speaking world and especially the United States. It's Hollywood and Washington, not charming little Brit shows or a sudden wave of tea-drinking, that they're talking about. Despite that, their core foreign policy for over 150 years has been obsessed with containing Germany, these days by keeping them in a strong alliance. The Germans are by far more important to them. The French aren't terribly focused on the UK and the stereotype of the Brits is mostly of boring, tradition-bound, stuffy yet insufferably contrarian people with awful cooking. In short, the French think the Brits are dull. I have never heard a French comedian ever bother to make a joke about the UK outside of Brexit (the Belgians, sure, Italians and plenty of others but never Brits) but British TV, film and even KZbin rarely resists a jab at the French (even the Germans get less grief). It's a bit like how Canadian comment on the US a lot but Americans just think Canada's kind of dull.
@PeoplecallmeLucifer
@PeoplecallmeLucifer 2 жыл бұрын
16:50 even DR Congo is looking to become a member of EAC
@lukaswirmsberger6260
@lukaswirmsberger6260 4 жыл бұрын
I don't know if you know but that England+France thing almost became a fact several times. The Angevin empire under Richard I controlled most of France and all of England. During the 100 year war England controlled most of France too for a long time.
@georgin81
@georgin81 4 жыл бұрын
i love your 2 channels
@perfilgenerico8717
@perfilgenerico8717 3 жыл бұрын
There were some countries that existed by breaking from Brazil, outside uruguay, the longest lasting lasted 10 years, it was the Farropilha Republic in the deep south. Nowadays some people in south still want independence
@robertwilloughby8050
@robertwilloughby8050 4 жыл бұрын
Anybody up for the Free Federated State of Yorkshire?
@jackharan3791
@jackharan3791 4 жыл бұрын
Yorkshire party for the boys
@annymous-bz2xx
@annymous-bz2xx 4 жыл бұрын
YeeeeeAaaaaaah
@alexpotts6520
@alexpotts6520 4 жыл бұрын
Anybody from Yorkshire who might be able to help me on this - why is "Yorkshire" such a strong identity marker? I find this particularly strange as the counties of North Yorkshire (rural, middle-class) and South Yorkshire (post-industrial places that haven't recovered from Thatcher) are very different from each other.
@markcotton3481
@markcotton3481 3 жыл бұрын
​@@alexpotts6520I think it's just because it's historic.
@rangerbobox1915
@rangerbobox1915 2 жыл бұрын
Some part of me thinks that ibx is just doing this on his own and that someone else is secretly recording these and uploading them to this channel.
@kristoffer-2614
@kristoffer-2614 4 жыл бұрын
The Polish - Swedish Union should have been in the video. During the end of the 1500ds, It was a short lived personal union between The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Swedish Kingdom. It would have been such a great country! Maybe a video for another day perhaps?
@matan2924
@matan2924 2 жыл бұрын
7:30 what? No they don’t. Australia, usa and the UK also all speak the same language. Doesn’t mean they want to merge
@DacusMalus1600
@DacusMalus1600 7 ай бұрын
Yugoslavia was precisely one of the countries that coined the term third world by being non aligned. First World: the capitalist west/Nato The "second" World: the Soviet Union, the Warsaw Packt, China, and so on. The third World: countries that would normally belong to either of the other two but decided to stay neutral. Sweden, Finland, Yugoslavia ...
@debajyotidas1
@debajyotidas1 3 жыл бұрын
When everyone has something to give to the EAF. Burundi: I'm a freeloader.
@realchaos32
@realchaos32 3 жыл бұрын
i love this guy
@TheXenomorphGuySMSE
@TheXenomorphGuySMSE 3 жыл бұрын
you discuss a new country like your reading the changelog for a new Minecraft update.
@StarsManny
@StarsManny 2 жыл бұрын
Tasmania would be a great country! I know nothing about Tasmania and I've never been there, I just think they should be their own proud country.
@seabomb1
@seabomb1 4 жыл бұрын
The Bougainville referendum was non-binding though
@srdxxx
@srdxxx 4 жыл бұрын
A successful CSA might indeed have been interesting, but the USA and CSA would have been inherently adversarial, and likely would have been on opposite sides in the world wars, which likely would have led to a different outcome. Probably not worth it, even if interesting.
@robinsteens4172
@robinsteens4172 4 жыл бұрын
As a Belgian I can confirm that both sides are right, the brittish people as well as the french are arrogant :)
@theducc3203
@theducc3203 4 жыл бұрын
I'm not arrogant :(
@niensaddestofthesad8151
@niensaddestofthesad8151 4 жыл бұрын
La france iz ze land of ze hairy baguette and the UK is land of the stuck-up tea drinkers
@Aarontlondon
@Aarontlondon 4 жыл бұрын
Maybe you should learn how to spell ‘British’ before you affirm that entire nations arrogant.
@bruhtonbruhkkinson6848
@bruhtonbruhkkinson6848 4 жыл бұрын
@@Aarontlondon they're talking about people from Brittainy, what the fock you mean.
@Aarontlondon
@Aarontlondon 4 жыл бұрын
Velkayne of Lorvaesch Nojaeiro People from Brittany aren’t called ‘British’ or ‘Brittish’ you fucktard. Get your facts straight before getting involved in shit you don’t know
@themisterceapa1871
@themisterceapa1871 4 жыл бұрын
Romania was not "basically a puppet state" of the soviet union. A split occured mainly due to ceausescu's ideology of national communism (a weird mix of nationalism and communism). Quoted wikipedia below in case anyone wants to read into it "After coming under communist control in 1948, Romania was closely aligned with the international policies and goals of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. But after mid-1952, when Gheorghiu-Dej had gained full control of the party and had become head of state, Romania began a slow disengagement from Kremlin domination, being careful not to incur the suspicions or disapproval of Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin. Soviet troops left Romania in 1958, no Warsaw Pact troops were allowed on Romanian territory after 1962, and Romanian forces essentially quit participating in joint Warsaw Pact field exercises in the late 1960s. At the same time, Ceausescu announced that Romania would no longer put its military forces under the Warsaw Pact's joint command, even during peacetime maneuvers. By that period, the Soviet Union and Romania established SovRoms, which were the new tax-exempt Soviet-Romanian economic corporations that helped the reconstruction of Romania until they were dismantled in 1956: albeit, some lasted until 1975 with the main focus to assure Soviet access to resources like Uranium. In 1976 Ceausescu received Leonid Brezhnev in Bucharest-the first official visit by a Soviet leader since 1955. The final communique of the meeting reflected continuing disagreements between the two countries, as Romania refused to side with the Soviets in their dispute with China. In 1978, after visiting China, Ceausescu attended a Warsaw Pact summit meeting in Moscow, where he rejected a Soviet proposal that member countries increase their military expenditures. On his return to Bucharest, Ceausescu explained the refusal by stating that any increase in military expenditure was contrary to the socialist countries' effort to reduce military tensions in Europe.[13] Perhaps because of Ceausescu's uncooperative attitude, a 1980 Romanian attempt to secure supplies of energy and raw materials from the Soviet Union and other Comecon countries failed when those countries demanded world market prices and payment in hard currency. Nor would the Soviet Union guarantee that it would increase or even maintain existing levels of oil exports to Romania for the following year. Dumitru Prunariu and Leonid Popov with Leonid Brezhnev in 1981 The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan caused Romania to distance itself further from Brezhnev. When the UN General Assembly voted on a resolution calling for the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of Soviet troops, Romania broke with its Warsaw Pact allies and abstained. And one month later, at a meeting of communist states in Sofia, Romania joined the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) in refusing to endorse the invasion.[13] During Yuri Andropov's brief tenure as Soviet leader, relations remained frigid. The wording of the communique following a meeting with Ceausescu in Moscow suggested that Andropov intended to pressure Romania to bring its foreign policy into line with the Warsaw Pact. The Romanian leadership appeared to suspect Andropov of pro-Hungarian sympathies because of his close personal friendship with First Secretary János Kádár of Hungary. Romanian disagreements with the Soviet position on intermediate nuclear forces in Europe also surfaced during the Andropov period. "
@annymous-bz2xx
@annymous-bz2xx 4 жыл бұрын
Onion Guy shut up
@makelovenotwarnoob
@makelovenotwarnoob 4 жыл бұрын
I think that EU will become a federation. It might take another 10-20 years but we have no other choice if we, as europeans, still want to have influence in the world. I think the European Federation will be a great thing.
@SilvanaDil
@SilvanaDil 4 жыл бұрын
In 10-20 years, the median age in Europe will almost equal the retirement age (unless you count Middle Eastern and African migrants).
@maherhamadouch2005
@maherhamadouch2005 4 жыл бұрын
@Stacey Raven no we're not stupid, we need sovereignty over our lands, cos fuck a Euro empire
@KenrickBrown75
@KenrickBrown75 4 жыл бұрын
@@maherhamadouch2005 To be honest, your nation will have no sovereignty as a small, puny state. The only way to save your people is to unite with others. Take it from an American: a federal Europe will be a superpower.
@Alto53
@Alto53 4 жыл бұрын
@@KenrickBrown75 right. No sovereignty when it is it's own state? You don't know what the word means.
@maherhamadouch2005
@maherhamadouch2005 4 жыл бұрын
@@KenrickBrown75 I won't take lessons from any American: 1 you began life as a colony, then began colonising other lands 2 the US is too diverse to stay as 1 nation
@TheExodvs
@TheExodvs 2 жыл бұрын
"Depends on which countries you're counting and which ones you aren't." *immediately puts Taiwan on the screen*
@poesc
@poesc 4 жыл бұрын
Great video, I was waiting for you to do Scotland.
@Jivvi
@Jivvi 4 жыл бұрын
20:40 The UK passport is in English and French, because *_every_* passport is in English and French, as well as the official language of the country, if it's different.
@gillettematch3188
@gillettematch3188 2 жыл бұрын
there was an attempt to make argentina & chile into one country during the 50s there's also a flag about it.
@Taco_King00
@Taco_King00 2 жыл бұрын
A United Skandinavia would had been intresting. With Sweden, Norway, Finland and Denmark.
@tomasbindateplitzky928
@tomasbindateplitzky928 2 жыл бұрын
Well that existed, it was the Kalmar Union
@gringoviejo1935
@gringoviejo1935 4 жыл бұрын
someone else may have mentioned this: newly independent Mexico (1821) had already ended slavery in 1829/1830. that's why slaveholding Texicans - as they were then known - fought for independence from Mexico in the mid-1830's. ergo, the timeline for Golden Circle is off. CSA didn't come into existence for another 30+ years, 1861. interesting fact: when Texas joined USA in 1845, they gave up any claim to the northernmost part of the state which was on the northern side of the 36°30' north parallel where, due to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, slavery was forbidden. that strip of land remained unorganized until it was annexed to Oklahoma, a onetime indian territory, when it became a State in 1907.
@carried_copper586
@carried_copper586 4 жыл бұрын
'france is the UK's closest neighbour' Ireland: am I a joke to you?
@Cotswolds1913
@Cotswolds1913 3 жыл бұрын
Yes
@dawidblachowski
@dawidblachowski 4 жыл бұрын
Don't forget about Republic of Upper Silesia, that almost come to existence in 1918
@cartoonsforall6469
@cartoonsforall6469 4 жыл бұрын
Toycat: there is 190 2,4,6,8 countries UN’s 193:Am I a joke to you
@aaronpowell9891
@aaronpowell9891 3 жыл бұрын
*Vatican city left the chat
@MasterFalkner
@MasterFalkner 4 жыл бұрын
i'm of the belief that if decolonization never happened from 1900 to the present there would only be 13 countries right now. 1. British Empire 2. Dutch Empire 3. French Empire 4. German Empire 5. Iberian Union 6. Scandinavian Empire 7. Ottoman Empire 8. Persian Empire 9. Soviet Union 10. American Empire 11. Chinese Empire 12. Japanese Empire 13. South Korea (with North Korea being apart of the Soviet Union or China)
@BasicLib
@BasicLib 2 жыл бұрын
You either missed or recolonised way too many countries
@craigmiller1870
@craigmiller1870 2 жыл бұрын
This guy views a lot of things as wacky. Takes one to know one, i guess. I met a Liverpudlian once, he was annoyingly serious. Anyway, I'm loving these geography videos!
@Inseut
@Inseut 4 жыл бұрын
19:10 south america homogenous? Looooool even the Brazilian states are all too different one from another, imagine all the other countries. It's not because we speak mostly the 2 same languages (and a bit of French, a bit of Dutch, a bit of English) and we were colonized by the same people that we are homogenous.
@Inseut
@Inseut 4 жыл бұрын
i don't think i put the right timestamp here because KZbin changed its app and it's all weird but anyway
@guppy719
@guppy719 2 жыл бұрын
Its Homogenous compared to Africa or Eurasia
@alahiri2002
@alahiri2002 Жыл бұрын
In comparison to other continents (mainly Asia and Africa), the Americas are significantly more homogeneous. That doesn’t mean there are no regionally distinct ethnicities, but these differences are nowhere near as pronounced as those in places like Asia and Africa.
@phwaedih
@phwaedih 4 жыл бұрын
1:00 One Hundred and Ninety... 2 4 6 8 who do we appreciate? *toycat*
@MintyFarts
@MintyFarts 4 жыл бұрын
@ibx2cat Zealandia is a smaller continent and NewZealand is basically the entire area of it above ocean and governed by a single government.
Why Do Europes Dumbest Countries Exist At All?
23:02
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 206 М.
11 Maps That Raise More Questions Than They Answer
26:13
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 196 М.
Mac & Cheese Donut @patrickzeinali @ChefRush
00:53
albert_cancook
Рет қаралды 236 МЛН
INO IS A KIND ALIEN😂
00:45
INO
Рет қаралды 14 МЛН
The North Korean Embassy In London Is Hilarious
17:53
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 1,9 МЛН
The Secret Nordic Countries?
21:02
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 411 М.
12 Different Ways To Divide The World In Half
25:01
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 735 М.
Germany Has The Worlds Weirdest Borders
25:02
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 965 М.
The EU Is Expanding Into 7 New Countries Right Now
17:05
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 32 М.
Why Do Passports Only Come In 4 Colours?
17:26
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 170 М.
British Person Re-Draws The American State Boundaries
24:19
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 106 М.
5 European Mega Projects Of The Next 20 Years
28:26
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 332 М.
Why Does Haiti Not Have Laws Anymore?
15:31
ibx2cat
Рет қаралды 15 М.