6. Deleuze's Reading of Nietzsche

[@yazanasad7811]

Your life is affirmed when that satisfaction/presence occurs because it took all of eternity to get to that moment. Nice!

[@matthewlunt8831]

Holy fuck, are we there yet? Right?

[@pokemax555]

I wish those who engaged with these philosophers ever, ever critically examined the Christian antisemitic propaganda in the phrase """Judeo-Christian""" and the idea that this is a continuous lineage and not a program of structural violence

[@whereisawesomeness]

In fairness, Nietzsche and Deleuze make a differentiation between the two. They don’t really examine the (ongoing) history of violence there, to their detriment, but they don’t lump the two together either

[@pokemax555]

@@whereisawesomeness I obviously knew that. I wasn't even specifically highlighting the thinkers themselves. read the comment this is not "in fairness," this is a bad-faith misreading, being contrary for the sake of being contrary.

[@dahterrasse]

Can a continuous lineage, or something very close to it, not include a certain aspect of violence? In this case, can Christianity not both trace its ancestry to Judaism _and_ at the same time have lead to a violent turning against the jewish religion and people? As I see it, when discussing Judaism and Christianity, it is valuable to engage with both sides of this relationship. I definitely understand criticism when it comes to a tendency to ignore the latter, i.e. the violent aspect, but I can also understand that in certain instances, the former, i.e. the genealogical aspect seems to be more important for the case being made. A critical discussion of the overemphesis on this genealogical aspect does seem very valuable.

[@isaiahmrman6564]

difference differen differnce dfference diference dierence differece

[@exmodule6323]

That student who keeps interrupting is very annoying

[@matthewlunt8831]

Copy that!