Thank you again for the best analysis available for the public 👏👏👏
@molby1993 ай бұрын
Great video Mozzy! I think you guys were hinting at this towards the end of the video, but I honestly think that sail trim and foil cant automation will be the key tech that separates the winner and loser of this cup cycle. With correctly designed automation, the potential is enormous. You can do insane things like: - Create a 'one button' tacking program that syncs foil cant, sail trim, and mast rotation perfectly through the maneuver while providing the helm with a steering angle target that they can follow. Essentially guaranteeing a perfect tack/gybe every time. You could also do the same with mark roundings. - Set up a series of perfectly optimized (computer modeled) sail trim modes that can each be accessed by the press of a single button. With the trimmer only being responsible for small adjustments for shifts/puffs/ducks etc. The possibilities are truly limitless, and in an event where being just 1 knot faster all the time gives you a massive advantage, this is really where I think the winning team will stand out.
@anmihovil20 күн бұрын
Now, on October 22nd your post makes even more sense.
@molby19920 күн бұрын
@@anmihovil If any of the teams are looking for a project manager my services are available 😂
@nicholaycalhoun16813 ай бұрын
your coverage just keeps getting better and better, last cycle was well researched and very insightful, and this cycle youve gone even further. just watching your interviewing skills improve over the last few years has been impressive. youve been a major force in making the cup more accessible and interesting for people like me who dont have the time or interest or knowledge to pour over recon photos. other sports have full coverage of a season to keep fans interested and invested until the championships/finals, our sport, not just the cup, doesnt besides a few people like you, thank you for all of your hard work and time and knowledge, keeping both sailors and non-sailors interested in our niche and sometimes dying sport.
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
Thank you, kind words!
@knutpohl3393 ай бұрын
My thoughts exactly, could not have said it any better. Thank you guys!
@real2gone3 ай бұрын
Thanks Tom and Rob. Another deep dive into AC75 sail control systems. Much appreciated.
@iLLicitNz782 ай бұрын
Its great listening to your analergys while having a beer, An knowning that Team NZ have you guys so perplexed in there inovations
@daveevans25273 ай бұрын
I am not familiar with sailboat design, but I find these AC boats fascinating from an engineering standpoint. From the standpoint of wing design, being able to adjust the thickness of a wing at such low speeds (compared to aviation wings) makes huge sense. The relative speed between the air and these wings is probably similar to STOL aircraft wings. While airplanes in STOL mode are ok with drag because they have lots of available HP, clearly drag in these boats needs to be minimized. Plus EVERY airfoil has a stall speed. Check out the airfoil of Mike Patey's "Scrappy" build where he built a double leading slat design to change the wing shape to provide a wider range of air speeds with one wing (lower stall speed while maintaining a high maximum speed with low drag.) It is hard to change the thickness of an aluminum wing, so in aviation they change the chord instead. If I recall years ago NASA experimented with a variable thickness/variable shape airfoil. I think there were benefits in flight envelope, but the design was just too complex and expensive to justify the benefit. Since minimizing drag is critical in these boats, and you can't significantly change the chord, changing the camber and the thickness is all that is left. The thickness may be a second order effect, but being able to change airfoil shape for different wind speeds and angles of attack, while minimizing drag, could be a huge benefit (these are airfoils that need to generate lift at just a few knots without stalling nor significant drag, but also enjoy minimum drag while at up to 50 knots or more. Few aircraft have wings that can provide lift across a ratio of minimum stall speed to maximum speed exceeding ten. These boats need to. Clearly a minimum stall speed, and minimum drag across the entire "flight" envelope are key to winning the America's cup. And in such a tightly contested event, optimizing second and even third order effects seems justified, especially when it comes to the mainsail (wing.) So changing the foil's camber and thickness seems completely logical to me. Dave Evans
@paulbrown29713 ай бұрын
More education! Keep it coming. It really makes me enjoy watching the sailing even more
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
More to come!
@dmurphy15783 ай бұрын
New zelands main sheet looks so clean.
@mothhbugg3 ай бұрын
Yeah the leech on ETNZ at kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5C6ZWt9oqudack it's much cleaner than the others (not just at deck level either)
@lawrencefalk87143 ай бұрын
Yes, the AC boats are getting ever more complex; what if they used CrowdStrike and couldn't sail for the Cup? (great video. thanks!)
@roderick1673 ай бұрын
Too soon with crowdstrike jokes 😅
@AnttiBrax3 ай бұрын
Does anyone know what OS are they running in the onboard computers? Are they standardized?
@OliverBatchelor3 ай бұрын
@@AnttiBrax It's probably some kind of Linux, probably multiple computers, maybe with a ROS type system, though who knows. Given that the racecourse software is one design, there's a decent chance someone out there actually knows.
@powerlooper91213 ай бұрын
@@roderick167 😂
@nSnowCrow2 ай бұрын
Crowdstrike was fixed in half a day with actual human admins. The only problems were when you had not an actual IT guy on hand.
@fvingerhoed2 ай бұрын
It is amazing that these foils replace a big heavy lead keel.
@indycargordonross27333 ай бұрын
In 1990, I patented this wingsail system and the differential clew outhaul. I produced ultra low drag windsurf wings that could plane the board in 5 mph drafts. Good to see it used here.
@philippegaspart33113 ай бұрын
jeez’ you guys are going deeper every time. good job.
@OleMartinLyng3 ай бұрын
SO lovely and nerdy! Txs so much 4 keeping us updated on details! I learn much each time and have sailed since I was 7-8yrs
@Coolcmsc3 ай бұрын
The teams and the sailors gets a vote from me. This is amazing stuff. Nobody else is doing this (they think they are 😂), so thanks 🎉
@KiteTurbine3 ай бұрын
Fantastic bit of tech talk. Thanks yet again.
@frestonworks3 ай бұрын
One idea I had if allowed was to connect the forestay - halyard - tack round into a circular loop. With a tensioner arm to tighten the circuit/ circle. Meaning that the luff could be adjusted up and down the forestay whilst maintaining luff tension. This could be mounted under the foredeck down low. Would allow for a simpler single sheeting point at the clew on a below deck track.
@tristankiddie17103 ай бұрын
On the topic of creating thickness in the sail profile between the skins... I have been rewatching the previous cup races, from the pre event onwards. And one of the main things i have noticed is that Ineos seem to not be able to create as thick of a profile in the mainsail. In particular, this seems to restrict their power production in the speed build before foiling. So, while you share good points here about creating smooth flow off the mast, i do believe that being able to create more power for takeoff is actually a key component of being able to "thicken" the profile.
@tiagdvideo3 ай бұрын
Excellent once again - the AC organisation need both of you on the core team!
@GordonjSmith13 ай бұрын
Very informative and engaging - as usual! my thnx
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@NZbluesky3 ай бұрын
Thanks for posting this info. Very informative.
@Woodbug-b7t3 ай бұрын
One of the few times I've really enjoyed being taught! Thanks guys.
@Gottenhimfella3 ай бұрын
Responding to Rob's point at about 2:40 about the jib head being locked in place by the halyard lock, it might be worth thinking about small hydraulic cylinders (perhaps with mechanical advantage to trade stroke for force) one at the lock, and one at the tack, moving in a coordinated way to control sheeting angle, and differentially to control luff tension.
@Spartan9023 ай бұрын
These AC 75,s are becoming more technical than F1 I reckon. Love it! Cheers Mozzy.
@timjones30943 ай бұрын
Outstanding analysis ! Thanks guys
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
Our pleasure!
@craigw13793 ай бұрын
Great job guys
@charlottescott71503 ай бұрын
Amazing recon as ever
@NigelTufnel6123 ай бұрын
Excellent illustration graphics. Also, I had to chuckle at the comment about American Magic using "off the shelf" jib clew hydraulics - show me where you can buy something like that!
@peteharper36143 ай бұрын
As a long time sailor and engineer I'm intrigued by the topic of linked controls. The engineer side is fascinated about linking sail and foil controls to enable modes. With automation I can foresee push button settings. My sailor side sees this as taking away from the art of sailing. As a skipper you are constantly receiving feedback to adjust modes. Now that will be taken away and given to a computer. Rob's point that should this system fail you are "stuffed".
@weatheranddarkness3 ай бұрын
I think to that first point about sheeting angles relative to forestay adjustment, I think all this other stuff is because that would first off be far too crude an adjustment in terms of actual sail shape compared to what they're chasing. They probably also want to maintain the end plating at the tack through the range of clew adjustments. HAve we seen jib cunninghams on these boats? They definitely play with those on the F50s
@stephenmiller50043 ай бұрын
Well done both of you, very informative. Can you have a dense smoke dispenser coming out of the mast D section to show laminar flow along the skin?….as in an aircraft design wind tunnel
@grahamm20153 ай бұрын
From my experience of sailing a Class 3 land yacht, and sailing at high apparent wind I find the following. Getting going lots of mast rotation, even in a honking blow, the mast gets you going. Then it will be a matter of sheeting the main like never before and stopping the mast over rotating. The fine trimming is often made using the traveller. Easing the main causes it to fill, create huge amounts of drag and losses boat lengths. You only ease the main when you are about to capsize, except at the windward mark and you want it to hike and are look for a huge kick to accelerate as you bear off downwind. A friend as a final year engineering project built a wing mast with double skin sail. One of the outcomes was the need to be able to trim each sail independently It was never done but I don't think other than making the windward side not look awful, and would not have been actively trimmed. On an AC main the amount of friction between the two sails as they would be touching I would have thought it very difficult to have a positive effect. The key to speed is simplifying the controls, to work in harmony (linking them). On a land yacht the main sheet and cunningham are combined, so sheeting in flattens the main.
@luisbenjamincedielguzman108918 күн бұрын
As yatchmen I'm a fan of this top challenge. But I disagree about it's done today from it's very first days as an oceanic regatta.
@laurenceturner93463 ай бұрын
Really interesting video, I don't agree with the comments about the extra hydraulics. It allows you more control over the aerofoil shape... that can only be a good thing. As the boat accelerates it will change everything 1000's of times.
@dadcooks13473 ай бұрын
Hey guys, another great analysis. Have you noticed that team nz seem to be sailing with leeward heel quite often? Particularly in a stronger breeze. But I’ve noticed it in most conditions I’ve seen them in. Seems to be a very different mode compared to the last foiling cup cycles.
@luisbenjamincedielguzman108918 күн бұрын
Should be two very different regattas: Americas Cup for oceanic yatch's that can be able to navigate to the site of the challenge by it's own and other different contest for top tech sail F-1's yatchs. The late one's are not open to general world yatch builders. It's only open for top tech builders and is discriminative. First option can invitate more fans around the world and let people be more aware of keeping the oceans clean.
@powerlooper91213 ай бұрын
Another great analysis. Imho: the problem is that too many engineers and not enough sailors are providing input to their innovation...true sailors know that the predominant rule in sailing efficacy is KISS.
@Gottenhimfella3 ай бұрын
That has been (at least up until now) a key point of difference: in the Team NZ internal structures, since 1995 the sailors have been elevated to be the ones who have to sign off design. It has helped that Blake, Coutts and now Burling have all had technical engineering backgrounds, putting them in a position to initiate, as well as understand, effective communications with designers regarding control nuances and man-machine interface issues.
@Gottenhimfella3 ай бұрын
I would have put Glenn Ashby on that list too but in his case I don't know enough of his history. He certainly did an amazing job of communicating with the engineers during the very technical land speed sailing record campaign, in which the team was notably successful on the first attempt, and then broke their own record on the second.
@zlm0013 ай бұрын
Thanks.
@InnaShibalova2 ай бұрын
hey man i love the coverage. i search for new videos every single morning and when a new one comes out its kids out of the lounge time. i have one question ineos seem to be going down a totally different path with the jibs they are running pin head jibs it seems. any clues what they are doing.
@evanshaw173 ай бұрын
One of theses boats and crews will have max speed in all conditions and be able to sail closer to max angles. It may fall to the simplest boat to control. 😊
@qtrfoil3 ай бұрын
I think the differing foil cross-sections are going to far more important than they are common, despite broad appearances.
@jamesaron19673 ай бұрын
In retrospect, the D-mast dual-skin system is an overly complex affair for the primary purpose of eliminating the separation bubble to streamline the mainsail. There are commercially available 3D sail systems that do the same thing. They aren't that much more complicated than traditional sails and have low weight. They are highly adjustable for more camber and don't require a special airfoil mast at all. The main reason for the high performance of the AC75 is the tiny hydrodynamic drag and righting moment afforded by the articulating foil arm design, not the rig design. If the AC75 class is going to be retained for at least one more cycle, I think a simplification of the mainsail system is in order.
@Si-jk4iy3 ай бұрын
Whilst I don't disagree on principle, it creates a significant point of difference that enables the marketing of the AC to remain "leading edge". But more importantly I believe there is a large dose of politics at play here, whereby pushing this architecture of twin skins keeps sailmakers happier in an environment where they no longer get to develop code zeros or any form of downwind sail. They literally have fewer sales opportunities, which have ramifications across their entire big boat performance sector - which when extrapolated, must be a concern for them....... I don't want to sound conspiratorial, but the AC has historically led to trickle down technology and activity across many sectors within the marine industry.
@jamesaron19673 ай бұрын
@@Si-jk4iy There are solutions available that likely have similar performance profiles with certain advantages and none of the major downsides. A rotating mast and the absurdly complex sheeting systems add weight that for a foiling yacht is a big problem. What if similar performance could be attained with less weight penalty and far simpler implementation? The trickle-down would be better realized in the consumer market as well. In any case, the AC75 is set in stone now. The rigging configuration won't change until a new class is introduced sometime in the future. Regarding the sailmakers, I somehow doubt making them content was a consideration when the AC75 class was on the drawing board. Even if it was, there are other methods to accomplish what the D-mast/dual-skin mainsail does without displeasing the sailmakers. Alternative 3D designs may likewise implement two skins or variations thereof. I don't know why this particular design was selected when there are much easier ways to enhance the aerodynamics of the mainsail by eliminating the separation bubble without resorting to a convoluted system in which a consensus has yet to be reached, unlike the ostensible consensus for foil shape.
@solaireastora53943 ай бұрын
What other systems are there?
@jamesaron19673 ай бұрын
@@solaireastora5394 There have been a few different systems available and under development but my current favorite is the ACCWing.
@jamesaron19673 ай бұрын
@@solaireastora5394 There have been a few but my favorite would probably be the ACCwing.
@CarkeekW3 ай бұрын
Its worth bagging out the leeward skin slightly more for takeoff in marginal conditions, if you take off 2 seconds before the other boat you carry that gain of being momentarily 3x faster and also a few knots faster for the entire time you both build to maximum speed.
@JasonfromNZ3 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
Welcome!
@JasonfromNZ3 ай бұрын
@@MozzySails Great content as always... Thanks for all the analysis!
@BruceHoult3 ай бұрын
When did jobs stop overlapping mains? They did on 12m, and still on the IACC boats in Valencia in 2007. In the first foiling cats in 2013 there looks to be no mast avoidance needed at all while taking or gybing, but I think there is a little on the 2010 big cats. Was over lap never any good? Or it's the difference between 20 knot boats and 40 knot ones?
@malin54683 ай бұрын
Could you kindly give us your thoughts about why the INEOS hull seems to have so much more windage?
@uflux3 ай бұрын
Does the ETNZ system allow them to pump the main in light wind to help get onto the foils 🤔
@Wattswood-Carpentry-Joinery3 ай бұрын
Great vid thanks guys. I wonder if you can tell me: the job sails (certainly some codes) are fairly upright triangles, I would have thought guiding the airflow through the slot from foot to the highest possible point would give best lift. Why do the jobs have a bigger and bigger slot size as they go up?
@Wattswood-Carpentry-Joinery3 ай бұрын
*jib
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
They are. It's becuase the teams can't change the forestay angle, or the sheeting location on the deck, so the only real way to make the jib smaller for higher winds is to reduce its length along the forestay
@johnandrews28533 ай бұрын
Although it sure is true the jib halyard must be under high load and basically locked, this does not prevent moving the sail luff up and down the forestry… assuming its a ‘stuff-luff’ style ??
@greybuckleton3 ай бұрын
Could you use camber control to reduce the drag of the sail at speed? Some wings have a reflex (negative) camber to delay flow separation or transition to turbulent flow.
@andrewpardington75263 ай бұрын
Some footage looks like tnz is pumping the main
@charliemcmonagle3 ай бұрын
Thank you for the discussion on how mast rotation plays with the double skin. Really helped to understand that. Question - how are they attaching the skins to the masts? Car and track for each skin? Is there a big variation in this? And smoothing the transition to the mast?
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
With a track and bolt rope. Generally lighter than tracks and cars
@Gottenhimfella3 ай бұрын
@@MozzySails Presumably the batten inboard ends have cars? or at least thrust low friction elements engaging independently with the tracks?
@williebooth3 ай бұрын
What are your plans for covering the cup?
@lesp3153 ай бұрын
With a straight track you can have a longer foot of a jib.
@jaaaaapor3 ай бұрын
What happened to those foiling chase boats? I only ever see RIBs in these videos...
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
There are some still to be delivered. And thre ones in Barcelona don't see lots of use. I don't think they would be very practical as a support boat as they are hard to bring alongside, but they might be good for VIP
@floodo13 ай бұрын
mmm things are heating up. GET PUMPED
@leotard25363 ай бұрын
Where can I follow Rob? Seems like he knows a lot.
@MozzySails3 ай бұрын
@rbcg105 - he doesn't post much though
@rbcg1053 ай бұрын
Only on Mozzy sails. I need someone to edit me.
@blinkybagger83422 ай бұрын
Re the sunken Bayesian and link to the AC. Someone should ask Dean Barker (if he's floating around in Barcelona) if he knows, or knew Bayesian's captain James Cutfield. I think they may have gone to high school together, or are familiar with each other via sailing. Bayesian might have been expected in Barcelona at some time during the coming months.
@artistglyn3 ай бұрын
As usual, ETNZ have the drop on the rest.
@dulls84753 ай бұрын
Have the modesty to wait until they win....so 2024..
@scottbarker59303 ай бұрын
Why don't they place the yacht below the water line, huge stability and speed improvement?
@kopeducati2 ай бұрын
needing cyclists to sail ... because rules won't allow electric motors or pumps?
@londonman86882 ай бұрын
it is not sailing
@GrogHambone3 ай бұрын
"Self tacking" means not sailing the boat yourself. Pathetic. I hate these boats. They might be a hell of an exciting boat to sail on..... but the racing is terrible. Use foiling cats..... MUCH better, and closer, racing.
@jamesaron19673 ай бұрын
@@GrogHambone Well, we have Sail GP. There are many races and it's every year. Variety is the spice of life...
@SxWerks3 ай бұрын
So much appreciate the deep dive into the sail controls. Wish you could distill them into a first principles summation.
@dadcooks13473 ай бұрын
Hey guys, another great analysis. Have you noticed that team nz seem to be sailing with leeward heel quite often? Particularly in a stronger breeze. But I’ve noticed it in most conditions I’ve seen them in. Seems to be a very different mode compared to the last foiling cup cycles.
@rbcg1053 ай бұрын
I saw that as well. Interesting. Maybe they can run a little more cant doing that