Only pity is that the Prof. didn't have time (or maybe the Host didn't give enough time ... lol) to expend further to analyses on the current relationship between SOE & POE on social resources distribution issues, bias on social policy making towards these two social ownerships issues and Chinese cultural tradition prejudice etc. when facing official/authority vs. private merchant. [trans.] 唯一遺憾的是,教授沒有時間(或者可能是主持人沒有給足夠的時間……lol)進一步分析當前國企和私營企業在社會資源分配問題上的關係,對社會的偏見面對官商與私商時,對這兩個社會所有製問題和中國文化傳統偏見等問題的決策。
@lioicomestai37032 жыл бұрын
Is the Prof. talking about Hong Kong's deep structural issue on post National Security Law indirectly here? mmm .... [trans.] 教授是不是在這里間接談及香港在後國安法上的深層結構性問題?嗯……
@lioicomestai37032 жыл бұрын
Again, as the Prof. Shu's point started from SOE, this reflects one of Leninism's ideology which Mao followed such principle did his famous policy during early 50's called "Public Private Combination Run" which was very smoothly progressed. Such a Tumour didn't detected till 80's when "Reform & Open" launched. Now we know it is a origin of the CCP cancer. [trans.] 再次,由於舒教授的觀點是從國有企業出發的,這反映了毛澤東遵循這一原則的列寧主義思想之一,他在50年代初的著名政策“公私合營”,進展非常順利。這種腫瘤直到80年代“改革開放”推出時才被發現。現在我們知道這是中共癌症的起源。