8 Mistakes and Details in Gone In 60 Seconds Only Car Enthusiasts Would Notice | On Board

Gone In 60 Seconds (2000) is a great, fun film that's filled with detail and action. However it's also got its fair share of car related errors (some quite big) and awesome behind the scene stories. So just for fun, and in fondness for the film, I've picked 8 of my favourite mistakes or details in the movie that only car enthusiasts will likely notice or even care about.
Please do enjoy.
Thanks.

[@benny3563]

13:20 LM002 not LM400.

[@AveragetoPoor]

Damn, well spotted! I must've been thinking about the Lexus that follows at that moment! Thanks for watching, Benny!

[@strydyrhellzrydyr1345]

Ah.. nice...

[@strydyrhellzrydyr1345]

@@AveragetoPoor oh.. well.. ok well. Ya gotta redo the whole video now... Lol

[@i_have_a_coat]

1 Mistake and Detail in 8 Mistakes and Details in Gone In 60 Seconds Only Car Enthusiasts Would Notice Only A Car Enthusiast Would Notice

[@1977rw]

@@AveragetoPoor You also got the Lamborghini Diablo wrong. It was never on his list. If one pulled into a container, it was probably to sub for the Jaguar XJ220, because they couldn't find an XJ220.

[@anthonyriordan2391]

I couldn't imagine this film having a GT-40 as the hero car. That mishap was actually a huge win for the film.

[@skylined5534]

I don't think a gt40 as the hero car would have been a bad alternative car though.

[@orest395]

But how would they make replicas?

[@Axlnut0341]

@@orest395 Superformance will build you as many Shelby licensed GT40s as your heart desires.

[@orest395]

Yea but building gt500 replicas are cheaper that gt40s replicas

[@goosegarage78]

Haliki was a millionaire and self funded the orginal film. Only reason GT40 would be cut as it was most of the films budget.

[@t-topgarage7887]

This movie inspired so many motorheads, me being one of them. There’s just something so special about Eleanor and Memphis’s relationship with her, and the nostalgic feel the movie gives you. Truly one of the best car movies of all time.

[@jameshanna7914]

Watch the original...truly amazing!

[@RT22-pb2pp]

LOL was bad movie cras were only thing good Can name 5 better car movies ford v ferrari rush bullitt grand prix and smokey and the bandit and even cannon ball run all better movies and better cars and driving scenes not so over the top fast and furious fake BS

[@evandaymon8303]

@@RT22-pb2pp Jeez who pissed on your cereal? Dont have to be a dick about it man.

[@jonnybgoode7742]

​@@RT22-pb2pp "low rider Donny... Donny low rider"

[@MWest31007]

The amount of times ive watched this movie on vhs as a kid is inhumane. Had an Eleanor die cast model as a kid and now own a 21’ GT/CS the influence is real

[@Beer-can_full_of_toes]

I mean it’s a California Special so you still need help lol. Go find a Boss or grab the new Mach 1 as that was the original Gone in Sixty Seconds hero car. I’m being sarcastic of course. Those cars are crazy expensive. I have a 71 and 03 Mach 1 but I don’t know how I’m going to be justifying the price for the new one.

[@MWest31007]

@@Beer-can_full_of_toes At the time when I bought my car in 2021 the mach 1’s were scarce and super marker up would love one though but ive modded my GT/CS to make around 485-500hp so im happy! Mach 1 and the GTCS arent that far away in price either!

[@WhiteDwarfVR4]

@@Beer-can_full_of_toes the 71 Mach 1 will always be the true Eleanor in my eyes. Even though it wasn't my favorite body style, having grown up in the back of a 70 Mach 1 🤣

[@Beer-can_full_of_toes]

@@WhiteDwarfVR4 it was a 73 in the movie but I like the 71 because even though they had started putting smog tech on it they didn’t take anything away from its performance yet. It is the biggest mustang ever built dimensionally and also the ugliest compared to its predecessors. The 70 was about the coolest looking next to the Shelbys.

[@Beer-can_full_of_toes]

@@MWest31007 can’t knock a modern GT. I just like to talk smack about the CS as it’s basically a sticker. On the subject of talking smack: do you know what mustang stands for? Mostly Used Shit That Ain’t No Good 😎

[@80s90sGuy]

If the Humvee wasn't ment to push the police car over the drop.... why was there a camera there to perfectly capture it happening 🤔?!

[@theredneckratter6199]

The director liked the improvisation so had the stunts and props crews reset the police car and reshoot the drop

[@WardyLion]

Can I just say the presentation and style of this video is amazingly well done?

[@onsokumaru4663]

Indeed.

[@josephwolf7552]

I am not even a car enthusiast, you could tell me this car has this special feature and I would not know. But I still enjoy this movie, it’s a fun movie

[@gobear83]

Wow…I cant imagine how much work you went through to figure all theses mistakes , bravo !!!

[@mihoover39]

The reason the Lamborghini Diablo was used in place off the Lamborghini LM002 is the LM002 was too expensive and too rare to be used in the film. Most of the cars were rare and hard to find so they opted for a different variant of the car in place of that actual car on the list

[@skylined5534]

If Doug Demuro can toss one around and give it some stick many years AFTER they increased in value and rarity I don't thin your thoughts on it hold up.

[@Axlnut0341]

LM002s traded around $100k in the late 90s.

[@beauxr.benoit1374]

Like with the scene with the Cadillac with the exhaust getting rid of the Cocaine. A FWD Eldorado Convertible in the first movie and a 1990 Something Caddie in the second movie.

[@elixier33]

I very much doubt it was too expensive for Hollywood to afford.

[@beauxr.benoit1374]

@@elixier33 Not Hollywood. The Car Insurance Company for the movie. They are separate, and like all Insurance Companies are stingy with money. That is unless you are paying them. A Shelby Mustang from the Sixties, and depending on the original equipment, can be from a high seven figure dollar car to a six figure dollar car.

[@talos935]

I love Vinnie Jones' botch in the Hummer 😂 Kinda matches his football style

[@upsidedowndog1256]

Pretty cool. When you showed the profile of Eleanor and the normal Mustang, the regular one was a 65/66 fastback silhouette instead of the 67. The 67 fastback is one of the coolest looking cars ever made!

[@jonathanwall2814]

I was strolling through the comments hoping someone else besides me noticed that 😆

[@plumcrazyhemicuda]

No such thing as a Plymouth Road Runner Super Bee. It's either a Plymouth RR Superbird, as pictured, or a Dodge Super Bee (Coronet 69-1/2, 70) (Charger 71)

[@powernut714]

Or the Dodge Daytona which was pictured

[@DarkDays2023]

As a Mopar guy I cringed so hard😂 Plymouth superbee😂

[@jackprice7992]

And the Superbird was not available in 1969

[@DarkDays2023]

@@jackprice7992 Yes🤣

[@anonymousinc6330]

Beat me to it. :)

[@k3nblock66]

Props for saying Brougham correctly! 57/58 Broughams are extremally rare with only 704 built. They were a money no object technological marvel. Yes, air ride in all 4 corners, but it also had power open close trunklid controlled from the glovebox and the lock on the rear of the car. And automatic locks. And 2 way memory drivers seat. And a transmission lock out if either rear door is open. And it came loaded with vanities such as: 1 oz. of Arpege perfume and atomizer, leather bound note pad and silver cross pen, 6 magnetic drinks tumblers that magnetize to the open glove box, make up kit, and a beveled handheld mirror.

[@mikeaninger7388]

Serious props to getting the Lamborghini Diablo SE 30 correct

[@finaltouchautodetailingllc]

I read an article, may have been improper info, but Nick Cage allegedly allowed his personal SE 30 to be used in the film, sorce stated he had an impressive lambo collection at the time.

[@vdochev]

In the original, Eleanor was a mach 1, so I always assumed that the '67 Shelby would fit as a new version of Eleanor. The GT40 is far too different of a car. That's interesting.

[@geraldburmeister9637]

At least these mistakes aren't super obvious. I remember watching dazed and confused which was set in the mid 70's and the old yellow camaro in the school parking lot had 82+ z28 wheels on it. Great work finding these issues.

[@irmaobarbado]

13:48 another mistake: Super Bee was a special pack for the Dodge Coronet. Plymouth builted the Superbird based on the Roadrrunner ONLY in 1970 for Nascar homologation. So, the correct would be "1970 Plymouth Superbird"

[@Sleeve_Did_It]

My favorite part is when Chris from @B is for Build finally gets his Eleanor back from Halicki's widow, now that a court ruled against her.

[@Scott_G]

If she's still got them in storage and didn't have them all destroyed. His wasn't the only one, but it was the one that made the most noise and let the public in on what was happening. I'd love to see that build return to BifB channel, but he's got a much better one now, even if it isn't from as iconic of a movie.

[@MartinKusimo]

Just watched the film (properly) for the first time. Great vid and deserving of much more than 16K views.

[@jamhen01]

The film refers to Mercedes-Benz being headquartered in Hamburg Germany where it is actually Stuttgart Germany

[@szr8]

Maybe there was an office in Hamburg that responsible for those laser cut transponder keys?

[@_baller]

"the snakes crawling up my ass"

[@whitestratman3158]

The rusty blue mustang with rear leaf shackles you used is actually a 1966 2+2 fastback. 1967 is when they changed the body style.

[@johnflett2531]

Also the 427 cobra photo used makes it look right hand drive (mirror imaged). I don't think there were any of those.

[@JCtheMusicMan_]

I absolutely love your presentation style! I love the use of the whiteboard and cutouts! 💜

[@TheGreenBastardMate]

I'm so glad you mentioned the XJ R blunder. Nobody else has mentioned it online and after watching it last night it was driving me crazy

[@DanielS2001]

Also, in addition to Number 7, by going with a Mustang, it ties back to the original 1973 film, as Eleanor, which were two 1971 Ford Mustang Sportsroofs that were painted school bus yellow and parts replaced to mimic the 1974 design. One of the Eleanors was used mainly for the 40 minute chase sequence and still exists in it's damaged but still functional state. The other was a standby vehicle used for certain scenes (like during the previous attempts to steal the Mustang were made). Essentially, by going with the Mustang for the 2000 remake and by heavily modifying the vehicle to look like a certain type of Mustang, it follows along the same tradition that H.B. Halicki himself followed when making the 1973 film.

[@AintScaredGarage]

They kept calling it a Mach1 and it wasn't, oh and its good to here someone other then myself refer to Grabber Orange as School Bus Yellow, cause thats what it looks like to me LOL

[@vimesagainsthumanity]

I love the original! I've had to introduce people to it. I've always thought that a nice nod would have been to have a Billy Cadillac cruising around in the remake.

[@akaraven66]

I always thought the remake used the GT500 as inspiration from the original film, back when I first watched both I had little knowledge on cars and looked quite similar in design and just thought nothing of it. I also love the original crash scene that was a 'mistake' and kept in the film.

[@desertdog3684]

The Dodge Daytona was only produced in 1969 on the Charger platform. The Plymouth Super Bird was produced in 1970 on the Roadrunner platform. Another mistake is the names are all over the place from the lists to dialogue. Examples: toby listing the vehicles he's found addresses on so far. Hillary. 1994 Xj220 jag Natalie. 1957 Bel Air convertible Tracy. 1998 Hummer H1

[@408sixbbl9]

A roadrunner is a bird. The car is 2 words. I don't even think they're supposed to be capitalized. Just road runner. At least that's how I remember the emblems on the cars back in the day.

[@hotwheelsbob2000]

@@408sixbbl9 It is a proper noun as a name for the car so it would normally be capitalized. If the word is not capitalized on the emblems, it is creative license.

[@davidkrutsinger5414]

He said super bee but showed the picture of a super bird.

[@michaelramsey82]

It's interesting that some versions of the list don't include the Diablo, considering it's featured fairly prominently on screen. The scene where Memphis and Sway flirt in the 'Cuda takes place while they're waiting to steal the Diablo.

[@siriusbreak2212]

A few of these I wouldn't call mistakes. Some were changes made to make it work. Namely Eleanor being a GT500 vs a GT40. It was a practicality choice. Not a really a mistake. Although perhaps wishing for a GT40 could be viewed as a mistake? Some of the others are for sure glaring mistakes, lol. Although, my personal favorite was the Humvee scene basically being physically "ad libed". That's awesome! I don't think I can make it sooooo.... let's try this instead!

[@Rayfaedundee]

Great informative video of this remake film. Me personally I still prefer the original 1974 film, if Gone in 60 seconds but this version is watchable especially for the one liners and the cars.

[@richardhatt6541]

You have Eleanor wrong. "Eleanor" is a customized 1971 Ford Mustang Sportsroof (redressed as 1973) that is featured in 1974 film Gone in 60 Seconds

[@richardnottelmann58]

The original is the best.

[@JurisKankalis]

The story and production quality of this video is on another planet.. sorry - level. What a gem. Watching this video has renewed my interest in the film, this time I'll watch it with my 13-year old son, who's hugely into cars - but before the film - we'll watch this video once more just as a warm-up. Well done! Another subscriber - from Latvia.

[@snailnda]

The Porsche 959 was illegal in the USA at the time, only in 2001 Bill Gates was able to receive his 959 who bought in the 80's, thanks to the "show and display law", but some 959's were imported in the "grey market" nonetheless

[@skylined5534]

You're forgetting that back in 2000 the 'show and display' rule would have exonerated the 959 though.

[@davidjoe3368]

959's were illegal in the U.S.A, because Porsche refused to allow their 959's to be crash tested by the U.S. Department of Transportation and Highway safety, because of the sheer cost to produce the 959. After Porsche saw what the DOT had done to a couple of Ferrari F40's that were submitted by Ferrari for testing, which the DOT totally destroyed with their tests, Porsche refused to allow the DOT to destroy two 959's valued at a million dollars. It cost Porsche half a million dollars to produce a 959 in the late 1980's, and they were selling them for a quarter million dollars each, to advertise and expand their brand with a Supercar. So literally, Porsche was losing a quarter million dollars on each 959 they sold! Good for the well heeled Porsche buyer's of the time, but bad for Porsche, well, kind of. By refusing to allow crash tests by the U.S. DOT, Porsche could not get signed off by the DOT to sell the 959 in the U.S.. Later because of the show and display law, 959 owners were allowed to drive their 959's, no more than 2000 miles per year, and holds true to this day.

[@mitchkelleher7972]

@@davidjoe3368 They're fully able to be imported and driven in the US without limitation now as they're over 25 years old.

[@davidjoe3368]

@@mitchkelleher7972 Yes and maybe, it is very advisable to know the laws in the State you live in, and make certain that the car you are considering to buy, or own, are in fact exempt. The 25 year exemption may not be observed fully in every State. I live in California, and I own a 1986 Toyota Hi-Luxe Pickup truck, and even though the vehicle is well over 25 years old. I still am required to smog the truck, even though the truck is 37 years old! I asked why at my local DMV, and they told me it is their discretion, as to when and if the vehicle, will ever be exempt or not. You cannot assume exemption, you have to know you have exemption.

[@mitchkelleher7972]

@@davidjoe3368 Yeah, you still have to pass emissions post '75 in CA, I believe, but Bruce Canepa got 959s to pass EPA somewhere over 20 years ago as I saw them at the first Rennsport Reunion in '01. Of course, that's not CARB, but I would guess they met that, too, since that's a big market.

[@skins4thewin]

Fantastic video! This was my favorite film as a Teen when I first got my License & was just getting into cars. Man how I loved this film!

[@un-trackable5705]

I love this movie, and I have enjoyed it many times. Even these mistakes don't compare to other, also great, car movie blunders. Thank you for the revisit of my childhood car fandom.

[@valhalln56]

The board might have said 1956 Thunderbird, but the Thunderbird that they took was a 1957.

[@skylined5534]

Because? Not challenging, just interested!

[@camaroboy1968ss]

Yep quite a different car, you could excuse the mistake between a 55 and 56 T bird, but not a 57

[@szr8]

I wonder if this could an in-universe character mistake, like maybe there were no 1956 or 55 models in the general L.A. area, but just the 1957 one that was stolen? I mean there is no guarantee that every specific model+year will actually be available in a given region, so it stands to reason that they might sometimes have to go with whatever is closest in the available pool of cars.

[@camaroboy1968ss]

@@szr8 I would agree with you on the 55/56 models as those 2 years are really similar in look, but a 57 T bird is a one year only styling. So if the person wanted a 57 it kinda has to be a 57 because of all the one year only stuff.

[@Alexx120493]

I love how 20 years after the film was made the list is split into effectively two categories: Cars that were icons even back then like the Gullwing, the XJ220, the GT500 and Porsche 959 and a lot of 2000s cars that you find today on craigslist or on junkyards. A 2000 Boxter, Navigator, Yukon or Escalade never reached any fame and today are just old cars that nobody wants anymore.

[@kevinokeefe8576]

One major production/continuity error in the movie that I noticed. When Memphis and Kip are driving home after scouting some of the cars. Externally it shows an early 70's Chevy Malibu/Chevelle as they are driving along. Then it goes to an interior shot where they are talking about getting food. It is obvious that the interior shot is in a Chrysler minivan and not the Chevy. Then Johnnie B and his gang cut them off causing them to sweve off the road. External shot of Chevy with Memphis telling Kip to get out of the car as Johnnie B's gang prepares to shoot the car.

[@eriksipos373]

The effort you have put into this video is extraordinary. Well done!

[@regibson23]

That Sphinx thing is bullshit. Why would they place camera there if they didn't expect the car to get pushed off?

[@kdmag8858]

-"I asked for 50 cars, not 49 1/2" -"Good news, it's 50 1/2!"

[@jameshanna7914]

I enjoyed this much more than I anticipated! Top notch mate!

[@misteriskh1166]

When Memphis shows the car list, there’s a Ferrari 265 GTB4, which is actually wrong, because the model had index 275 that means the capacity of each cylinder. At the Ferrari dealership Memphis as “Roger” tries to get from the manager info about that particular model “Now, if I was driving a 1967 275 GTB 4-cam…”

[@derekdavis8054]

U would not be a self indulging weiner sir....

[@smaze1782]

Wow. The production value on your videos is incredible. Excellent graphics and narration. Big thumbs up.

[@steves470]

Great video and however you made it, is amazing - well done! One of my top favorite movies also for many many years.

[@lovecraft88]

I love this break down. Thank you!

[@eggyness]

Isn't there a GT40 replica market tho??? I'm pretty sure that that's a fairly commonly reproduced car, right up there with the Shelby Cobra (while we're talking about Fords).

[@xDivinitysCreaturex]

I think there are more than 10 cobra replicas for every GT40 replica out there.

[@gameovr17]

Fun fact the 1955 Caribbean had self leveling suspension

[@alexbennie]

Dude! Your production and editing is amazing!

[@aminma5142]

this type of videos are really entertaining wish you made more of them for other car movies like Need For Speed(2014) and Ford V Ferrari

[@fausto123]

My favorite car from the list was the HumVee. About the list of 51 cars. I have a theory that they had a draft with all the potential cars for the movie and whoever was commissioned to make the DVD manual had one of the drafts (meaning there could be more) instead of the final list and that could be the reason.

[@szr8]

I wonder if the list really could have been 51 and the characters were just rounding to 50 or assumed it was 50 and no one fully counted them all on the black board.

[@odinwalker4801]

@@szr8 Nice idea, but when watching the film, the cars are numbered & circled on the blackboard...still an epic film though.

[@elliottbutts153]

Enjoyed the video. There is at least one mistake with your video lol and I caught it right away. That is not a picture of a 1967 Mustang fastback that you used at the 9:59 mark when describing that they built 1967 Shelby GT500 replicas. The picture is of a 65 or 66 fastback.

[@chadschoen5055]

This was a fun video! Well done, chap!

[@Logan912]

Fun fact about the XJ220 - It was built specifically to be an upgraded and homologated version of their Group C prototype race cars so it could be raced in FIA GT championships that required a road-legal version to be produced.

[@bryan9857]

Biggest mistake I heard was when they listened to the v12 rev on the radio they said it had 5 cams lol.

[@repairist]

🤣

[@tomcharlton586]

yeah it sounded a lot like an F355 on the recording.

[@kenlykkeslett7501]

@@tomcharlton586 So 5 valves is probably the correct term then

[@Nickthestorekeeper]

Just noticed at 6:17 when the Jag pulls out of the garage, the driver window is almost completely up. Then guy sticks gun through window completely down, then when driver gets out, window is back up again.

[@gibbyhart3203]

First vid or yours ive watched. Love the editing style!

[@sahilc6656]

Wow!!! Such an amazing presentation and hard work. Love it, this was entertaining and detailed.

[@Moparornocar74]

As this is an older video I'm guessing someone may have caught this but just in case. At 7:06 when you were talking about the Jaguar XJ you mentioned two different engine options an inline 6 and a V8, however the inline 6 was discontinued in 1996 with the end of the X300 chassis code, and the V8 started in 1997 with the X308. There were two engine options in 1998 but they were both V8's both 4 litre 4 cam, one naturally aspirated with 250hp (XJ8) and the other supercharged with 375hp(XJR). The X300 XJ also had an R variant using the supercharged 4 litre DOHC inline 6, the same engine was also found in the Aston Martin DB7. Perhaps it wasn't a mistake so much as an odd choice to include the XJ6 at all?

[@qpSubZeroqp]

Amazing for the amount of detail in your comment! Great catch!

[@jshirwin68]

Quit playing Gran Turismo and start working on cars a little more. Sheesh

[@dgpofficial3640]

I came here to say this. The mistake wasn't XK8;XJ8, it was XKR;XJR. Who wants an XK8 lol. And yes the inclusion of the 6 in this video was way off target

[@dgpofficial3640]

OMG! I had paused to write this comment, then when I resumed the video he literally says the XKR WAS the XJ8, no way bro keep your Ks and Js separate lol

[@porsche928s4]

@@dgpofficial3640 I mean back when the movie was made it was still a nice car

[@bartpaelinck8321]

There's the directors cut of the movie on dvd , i love it. Best scene is the shaquille o'neal scene. Always makes me laugh.

[@skylined5534]

He was in this?!

[@bartpaelinck8321]

@@skylined5534 No, but they made a joke about him.

[@skaruts]

This movie is a good example of the discrepancy that often exists between the opinions of critics and those of everyone else, which is the reason I never care about what the critics have to say. I love this movie, and I don't consider myself much of a car enthusiast.

[@eliaszelarayanalbornoz]

51 car list, who knew. I love the film and watch it multiple time, but I never notice that. Great job man, take a bow

[@DanniV8]

One mistake that's bugged me for over 15 years now... In the Eleanor chase scene the BMW the cops are in has a clear straight 6 engine sound, yet when the rear can be seen there's a 540i emblem on the trunk. Which has a V8.

[@robertu]

9:00 Eleanor is and always will be a 1971 Ford Mustang with a 1973 grill. This is a hill I will die on!

[@notablynova4247]

💯

[@SteveDjy]

Nice move, man. Thank you!

[@christcarscountry6870]

Super impressed by the editing for this video.

[@simpleinverso8628]

I hate the fact that the people who own the rights to this movie will sue anyone with a Mustang made to look like the one in the movie. They have gone to insane length such as taking ownership of the cars.

[@mgansworth78]

Really?? You'd think they would be happy to have people copy the Eleanor design

[@youaremutt2026]

There's one mistake I don't think no one noticed in the movie: (the Plymouth superbird got mistaken for the dodge charger Daytona)

[@AveragetoPoor]

Well spotted! Thanks for giving the video a watch!

[@TheBlackScatPack]

@@AveragetoPoor and another mistake, when you mentioned the “1969” Plymouth Superbird, it’s suppose to be the 1970 Superbird.

[@martindavis2317]

No the superbird came up later, but he called it a road runner superbee.Was in alphabetical order by make.

[@NewbombTurk.]

@@martindavis2317 And completely incorrect...lol. The 1969 Super Bee is a Dodge based off of the Coronet, not a Plymouth Road Runner based off of the Satellite.

[@fillman86]

wow great video, and great production value!!

[@Cheap-Nasty]

The names really seemed on point for the cars. Good video!

[@ursucuak2906]

nice video and keep going, but i have a question : where did the fast and furious episodes go cause i cant find them on your channel anymore

[@MetallicGaming187]

I was about to ask that too

[@AveragetoPoor]

Thanks for watching, and good question! I hope you don't mind a lengthy response. So I decided to delete the Fast and Furious videos for a few reasons. Firstly, whilst they were by far my most popular videos I never really was very fond of them myself. I much prefer telling interesting stories such as those in my car history videos, so I was particularly attached to the Fast and Furious videos. Secondly, whilst they were supposed to be very light hearted and produced in fondness of the films, (the only reason I noticed some of the mistakes was because of how many times I've watched the movies) too many people seemed to see them as an attack on the franchise, and I didn't like the negativity that came with that. And thirdly, despite the video being well and truly covered under Fair Use Copyright Law, Universal Studios illegally claimed my video as their own and in doing so also claimed all ad revenue that came with it. Whilst I don't make any of my videos for financial reasons (I've barely made $100 over the last 2 years from running this channel), I found it annoying that this greedy, multi billion dollar company was breaking the law and essentially stealing money from me. So when considering all this last week I thought "to hell with it", and decided to just delete the videos. I hope that all makes sense, and again, thanks for watching and for your interest!

[@MetallicGaming187]

@@AveragetoPoor thanks for responding to us. While I'll miss those videos and they were fun i understand why you ended up deleting the video. Loved the new video keep up the great work friend!

[@AveragetoPoor]

Thanks, Brent! Shall do!

[@brettsalter3300]

sweet mercy I am confused. So, wait, Mary and Barbara were going out with Laura, Angeline is now with Brad but Jennifer is still friends with Patricia?

[@rockymtnstyle]

Wow, what a video. Props to you!

[@JonathanMoosey]

7:08 Actually the Jaguar XJ came with three different engine options. There actually was a Jaguar XJ12 that was produced for a few years with the V12 engine under the hood. The 12 cylinder Jag was in production from 1994 to 1997 and is very super rare.

[@tordoff80]

very expensive too

[@kenweis2291]

Every air ride system ended up leaking....from Cadillac to Lincoln Youd see the car almost dragging down the road

[@nickscholle]

Slight correction: Jaguar X308s (1997-2003) only come with a V8, so they are XJ8s. With the supercharger and some other upgrades, you have an XJR XJ6s were from the previous generations when they had inline 6s (and the XJR had a V12)

[@CYMotorsport]

13:15 okay so here’s what happened. It appears they planned on being able to film the SUV Lambo but ironically they were able to find an even more rare Diablo. They probably assumed the suv would be easy but it’s incredibly rare. You can tell they took this assumption pretty far bc if you look close, some scenes have both lambo on the screen eg the scene from the left side angle when Otto is writing on the board but in the famous front on shot, they just have “lambo” cut off which is the Diablo. Further, they actually show the Diablo on screen. More proof the original plan was both but couldn’t get the SUB. which brings your list down to 50 as they never actually show stealing the Lambo suv for this reason

[@alstound]

There are also two wrong things in the movie: 1. Eleanor would have run out of fuel by the time the nitro is exhausted during the car chase. 2. Memphis assembles a crew of many to steal all those cars, when the mob that’s threatening him seemed to have just one boss and two other thugs they could have easily overpowered or simply have the police take out easily.

[@Billybob09871]

This is almost "8 mistakes only list enthusiasts would notice". It would have been a mistake to make it with a GT40 though, the Mustang chase was literally the only good bit of the original. In fact mistake 9 should be not including a Mustang-switch-car-wash scene.

[@AveragetoPoor]

Haha yes you're right, the list really did offer a fair few mistakes, in fact, there were several more that I didn't include in the video in order to keep the duration down. I agree with you regarding the GT40, although it would've been interesting to see how a GT40 Eleanor would've been presented for the movie, as I imagine it would also have been tastefully modified as the GT500 Eleanor was. Thanks for watching!

[@Mich_-mu7fz]

@@AveragetoPoor Have you heard of the Eleanor build that never happened on KZbin? Copyright isn't favorable to anyone who's a content creator.

[@reydekim]

Great stuff!

[@JReaLBiz86]

I thoroughly enjoyed this.

[@Rio..o7..]

I always thought it was crazy how little money they were making for the 50 cars. I could see Memphis getting shafted as the real prize wasn't the cash but his brother but I'm curious what the original payday was for the job

[@akaraven66]

It's not about the cost of the cars, you are stealing some merchandise for a nice little pay packet, if one person won't take a job for that kind of money than Calitri would have just found someone else to do it. Calitri would have no doubt sold them all for a lot more than he was offering for the job.

[@BoostedReddy]

Also when they finish stealing the Ferraris from the warehouse the names over the radio and the blackboard don't match-up

[@theone861]

Very entertaining and well made!

[@jc-me3hf]

I'm wondering how many of those cars, specially the European ones, were not available in the US. Also, that all the cars, some of them really rare, could be found in one area of the world. Pretty sure that for some of them you have to drive a loooong way to find them

[@jacksutherland1]

Erm.... mistake No. 8 isn't actually a total mistake. Elenor is indeed on the chalk board in the movie, at least in one shot. Check 5:34 in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaqbgKaQjbZoe68. Other than that; great video about a phenomenal movie.

[@junit483]

Your video has a mistake. Thought you wrote it as 'Cuda (correctly) you miserable said Barracuda. Though they are similar the Barracuda is the base model and have a VIN that begins with the letters BH while a 'Cuda is the performance model and it's VIN begins with BS. Also, for the 71 model year only the 'Cuda version had the fender gill vents.

[@Dagasm]

I was browsing the comments to see if anyone else had picked up on this...

[@notablynova4247]

Doesn't this only apply to the E body though? Yes I know " 'Cuda " was introduced in 69 but Im not aware of the A body fish being separated by VINs.

[@jjramos46]

Angelina, ill have you someday. Even with all the mistakes this movie is awesome. I saw it in theatres when I was 15. One of my favorites.

[@daig8817]

6.55 not sure if it was only in the UK but the xjr came as a 4.0 i6 supercharged and a 4.0 v8 supercharged so they was both supercharged. The xj6 was a 3.2 i6 natural aspirated and the xj8 was a 4.0 natural aspirated 290bhp.

[@MrCharger6980]

Ok some more schooling from the Mopar community! The Daytona was only made in 1969 not 70! And yes based of the Charger of the same year. The Superbird was based off the Roadrunner!

[@vadr6383]

Gotta call bullshit on the pushing cop car not intentional. Why was there a camera to capture the shot?

[@mhicaoidh1]

My guess on the Caddy air suspension scene is that the answer is far simpler. They likely originally intended to have a Brougham in the scene, but couldn't source one. So, they put the other Caddy in ... and then (for whatever reason) didn't change the dialog for the scene.

[@Mihalyofficial]

Good effort on this vid and pointing out mistakes, but this movie is so awesome I've already forgotten what they are. Seriously. The story, the characters, who they are, what they do and the amazing cars. The incredible cars. 95% of modern movies dont even come close to it, probably the fast and furious fantasy reels would be remotely similar, but you cant take those movies seriously after tokyo drift.

[@chadalbee5655]

Considering the original Eleanor was a 73 mustang fastback with a 45 min car chase.

[@moparconnection]

As a Mopar magazine, we can assure that 1. there was NO Dodge Charger Daytona in 1970; and equally, there was NO Plymouth Superbird in 1969. The Daytona was a (half) year available car (503 built) for 1969, and the Superbird was a full run of production vehicle in 1970 despite being hand modified by Kar Kraft. (Just a couple more movie mistakes for your list.)

[@hitardo]

Great video! Loved it. Some annotations: 13:19 Did you mean the 1986 to 1993 Lamborghini LM002? I think the LM001, LMA002, LM003, and LM004 models had only one unit of each built. The LM002 had 328 units built. 14:10 I think it is only called "Turbo" or "Turbo S" - despite really being "Twin-Turbo". But it may depend on the market where the 993 was sold.

[@TheCisal]

Citroen DS did not never use air suspension system. System they use was called hydropneumatic suspension and it was one of a kind, later name was changed hydractive but citroen did use self leveling air suspension on their C4 picasso models only on rear axle. PS. that its Volvo V70R, not turbo wagon

[@danielkania9972]

well done bud i can honestly say this video had me really entertained my number 1 movie, had me pausing guessing the huge one, i believe there is another mistake but once you worked it out let me know and il tell you if your right :)

[@tubzvermeulen]

Thanks for the video

[@BigKrisMorris]

So well edited

[@Trancecub]

I can tell you a 9th Mistake: When Memphis meets Otto the first time after years they are listening to an old Audio of LeMans and a Ferrari 365 GTB Daytona which was exactly a 365 GTB Competizione. And in one scene Otto says while you could hear the Ferrari reving: right before the Redline at 5500 RPM. The Daytona in fact could rev up to 7500 RPM and the Competizione up to 8000.