A Gun Control Debate Part 1 --- Dr. Greg Bahnsen vs. Dr. James Atwood

[@joshhenderson7723]

Pure gold. Been looking for this debate for months. Need that pt2 homie.

[@gfbc1689]

next Thursday 🙂

[@ryanholst463]

This debate made me work on my sanctification

[@dannish8119]

Dr. Bahnsen is far greater than me. I have no patience for snakes.

[@gfbc1689]

Thanks for listening

[@Greg_the_Berean]

That Atwood is a snake indeed…

[@ryanholst463]

Thank you LORD for giving the universal church your saint...Greg Bahnsen

[@chrispark2698]

Atwood's entire opening statement was pure emotion - no stats, no Scripture, nothing to back up his OPINION. Atwood's opinion that people have no right to defend themselves is anti-Scriptural, anti-life, and pro-criminal.

[@1911GreaterThanALL]

Luke 22:36 “He said to them, ‘But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.’”

[@minnietrout814]

Protect, preserve and defend our 2A 🇺🇸

[@gfbc1689]

Thanks for listening

[@1911GreaterThanALL]

I believe the person who argues that you cannot kill another under no circumstances is fully ignorant of history. I wish he had the opportunity to make those same arguments of people killed by their attackers in the afterlife. I wonder what the lord would say about wanting to help others and defend others. How do you accomplish that when someone is bent on serious bodily harm as a minimum?