"Adultery Case" | Violative? | Supreme Court Landmark Judgment | Court's Observation.

[@Rohitmanotra664]

I don't know why every judge said that this article is discrimination against women. I mean how? It is totally discrimination against man but any of the judges did not mention that. Is man are not human or all man are just criminal not victim?

[@shivanipawar9782]

It was extremely informative especially the part in which you mentioned statements of individual judge of this bench, I hope in next video you will use this same pattern. Thank you

[@legalabstract6187]

Thanks it means a lot.

[@tiwarideepak7972]

Bhai ab video nhi aa rhi...Why......

[@alrumanchaush5637]

Section 494 women ke liye hai na.

[@neflibata2021]

I was thinking to search Adultery case on ur channel yesterday....but you yourself uploaded it and it appears in my feed. ✌️😇

[@legalabstract6187]

I understand my viewers thats why i portrayed this video.

[@spacetimegrid]

Adultery is not criminal but its just a ground for divorce! - What a Verdict

[@legalabstract6187]

Yes you are right.

[@michjackevermjackson5903]

Yes you cheat anyone in marriage and walk out happy with divorce and get married to the one they had physical relationship what a concept very nice judgement

[@dr.a.k.sharma5440]

ठीक वैसे ही जैसे आधार कार्ड परिचय तो देता है किन्तु नागरिकता नही। आश्चर्य है जिसकी नागरिकता ही नही है उसे आधार कार्ड निर्गत करने का क्या आधार हो सकता है? इसी प्रकार एडल्टरी अगर क्रिमिनल अफेयर्स नही है ये तालाक का एक ठोस कारण कैसे हो सकता है? क्या सिर्फ इसलिए कि महाभारत काल में माननीया कुन्ती देवी ने कह दिया तो राजकुमारी द्रौपदी का विवाह पांचो पाॅडवों से करना उचित स्वीकृत हुआ था?

[@ainulhasan9523]

27 September 2018

[@mehaksinghal8222]

Very niceeee🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

[@bantimunshi5576]

Very good vedio thank you so much

[@sahilarora5319]

I have a doubt that, agr ye section 497 srf male ke perspective se hai; then ye women ke liye inequality kaise show kr rha hai....ye to man ke liye kr rha hai inequality show

[@legalabstract6187]

Because according to Supreme Court Section 497 violates sexual freedom of women.

[@sahilarora5319]

@@legalabstract6187 yahi cheez samaj nhi aae kaise😅 plzz elaborate a bit

[@legalabstract6187]

@@sahilarora5319 Man can have an affair with some other person but in the institution of marriage if we talk about majority the women is considered much inferior and more restricted than men due to which she does not ensure the sexual freedom or having an affair with other person. Thus it violates her sexual freedom.

[@sahilarora5319]

@@legalabstract6187 so if we interpret 497 by taking into consideration for both man and woman, then will woman have sexual freedom ....

[@legalabstract6187]

@@sahilarora5319 You can't because according to section 497 a man can only be booked not women.

[@samarth7338]

Excellent bhaiya 😊❤️

[@legalabstract6187]

Thanks.

[@geetanjalidas2673]

Very much thank you sir.

[@legalabstract6187]

Welcome.

[@subhashreePandaa]

As you have mentioned above in thus video that context of adultery charges only to a man not to women as it abridges her Dignity and personal liberty thats the wholesome highlighted key points stated by honourable SC itself ok,,but ain't it violates Article 15 in straightaway!!!! (As ar-15 restricts discrimination on the grounds of Race,religion,caste,sex particularly and POB) if so then why women can't be manacle!!!as like a man!!!

[@legalabstract6187]

No it does not violatins Article 15 because Article 15(3) protected the same. According to Article 15(3) state can make special provisions for women and children.

[@subhashreePandaa]

@@legalabstract6187 yes I want to ask the same thing if a man can be manacled for the same offenses then why can't a woman!! If women are protected under a 15(3) then don't you thing it ll promote fake faminism more n more!!🤷 as we've been seeing female chauvinism is at its peak!👀 plz reply genuinely

[@legalabstract6187]

@@subhashreePandaa look...our society considered female as a victim all the time even if there is a fault from the women's side..it is harsh reality and due to which women uses the law as a weapon against others.. There should be nothing much that you can do about that context.. the only solution to this problem is that legislature can amend the law for the protection of males and for the betterment of the society.

[@subhashreePandaa]

@@legalabstract6187 exactly,,law should me made equally for men,,becoming a girl myself it might sounds absurd as m supporting males in this particular context just bcoz I don't believe in fake so called feminism!🤷 that isn't fair at all!!!☺️ i'm just a "civil service aspirant" came from a medical background(MBBS).. so I don't hv much idea about law and orders..but I felt "equal protection of law" & "equality before law" should be maintained neutrally!!

[@legalabstract6187]

@@subhashreePandaa You are an intelligent and sensible being thats why you spoke what is wrong and what is right..There should be no point of men supporting men and women supporting women. The only thing which matters that everyone should support the truth.

[@mahimansari3526]

Commendable job❤

[@mukeshdevi2108]

Hlo...sir ji ..thnkx thnkx thnkx thnkx thnkx thnkx Alot sir ji 👍👍🙏🙏👍🙏👍👍👍👍

[@legalabstract6187]

Welcome.

[@mohankharwar9087]

वैसे तो जानवर और इंसान में कोई अंतर नहीं रहेगा,

[@okman9684]

Mai Lord ye kesa kanun hai 🤯

[@ramchanderrao4874]

A

[@rakeshsingh-et5xt]

Kul milakar sirf tatal ho saktaa hai baas

[@ainulhasan9523]

198crpc

[@pinchan1240]

In log k wajah se wife adultery karne lagi unko patha kuch nai ka payega pati

[@PapuKumar-co2yc]

Ok

[@rajatpandey8631]

In feminist judges ko ban kar dena chaiye ye judge ko Delhi me rahte ha ye aur inki wife bigdi Hui e ha BJP should clear stand ant rooten out these judges