🎥 Join our KZbin members and patrons to unlock exclusive content! Our community is currently enjoying deep dives into the First Punic War, Pacific War, history of Prussia, Italian Unification Wars, Russo-Japanese War, Albigensian Crusade, and Xenophon’s Anabasis. Become a part of this exclusive circle: kzbin.info/door/MmaBzfCCwZ2KqaBJjkj0fwjoin or patron: www.patreon.com/kingsandgenerals and Paypal www.paypal.com/paypalme/kingsandgenerals as well!
@Guureufd10 ай бұрын
Happy new amazigh year 2974ⵣ
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
@@julia2k8 we have never claimed that, what are you talking about
@stuarthilton43910 ай бұрын
Do you ever do any collabs? I feel like you and HistoryMarche would make a good video.
@krips229 ай бұрын
This video, IT'S NOT THE 2ND CRUSADE AT ALL.
@trangho53178 ай бұрын
@@KingsandGeneralscan you make long video about second crusade please
@thomasrinschler678310 ай бұрын
8:58 "Atabeg" means "guardian", and the holders of the title were originally guardians of young Seljuk princes who had been given control over various cities across the empire, but were too young to rule themselves, and thus needed said guardians. By a curious coincidence, a lot of these princes died under mysterious circumstances, and the atabegs were content to continue their rule without their charges. I once read somewhere that the atabegs are great material for historical rehabilitators once they've finished with Richard III...
@thomasrinschler678310 ай бұрын
@@EnenDjhd if you're going to be literal about it. But a "guardian" and "father lord" are basically equivalent (as they weren't the princes' real fathers, but surrogate fathers to watch over them, i.e. guardians).
@vladimirkazakov303310 ай бұрын
There is one mistake - the Deraa mentioned in this video has nothing to do with Dara where Belisarius crushed the Persian forces in 530, the latter being much further north in today's Turkey
@tannerdenny543010 ай бұрын
Oh word? Nice
@frankscavelli603110 ай бұрын
Great video. Hope the series overall retains a solid element of the Byzantine perspectice like the 1st Crusade Series, and the geopolitical interplay between Latin West, Orthodox Romans, and Muslims. Very excited this has started.
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
There is a shift in the primary sources towards more Frankish chronicles. Alexiad obviously ends with the death of Alexios. Will still have Byzantine events covered, but less than in the previous series.
@hiskakun227610 ай бұрын
@@KingsandGeneralsIn my opinion Jonh II Komnenos is very important for the events of the second crusade. He campaigned in Syria to expand the Christian states of the region, but Raymond of Antioch and Joscelin of Edessa, vassals of the Byzantine Empire, didn’t cooperate (they didn’t like the Empire). When the emperor left to Constantinople, the crusaders started losing territory again, so John II decided to come back and annex officially Antioch (and Edessa?) from the crusaders, but he died in a hunt accident in Cilicia before arriving Antioch. In my opinion the death of John II Komnenos was one of the reasons of the second crusade. Had he lived, maybe the Empire would’ve annexed Antioch and Edessa and consequently Zengi probably wouldn’t have attacked Imperial territory, so Edessa doesn’t fall.
@adamwee38210 ай бұрын
3:37 Baldwin of Edessa was King Baldwins cousin, not sure if you guys forgot to add that part, but he wasnt just a random baron.
@jakekilley90378 күн бұрын
alot of the families were laid out in the first crusade video :D
@ytj17thjuggalo1210 ай бұрын
Great work you guys. Your opening scene here was a masterpiece. The stars fading out and light fading in. Had to watch it over a few times
@nenenindonu10 ай бұрын
The Artuqids gotta be the most influential of the early Turkish Beyliks participated in Crusades, produced great scientists, and left remarkable cultural sites
@nenenindonu10 ай бұрын
@@sarubet8725 Umar Al Djawbari and the legend Al-Jazari to name a few
@sarubet872510 ай бұрын
@@nenenindonu uHm BuT tHeY wErE aYrAbS nOt TuRk?¿¿
@arda21310 ай бұрын
@@sarubet8725 There is no reliable source for the ethnicity of Al-Jazari. All we know is he worked for Artuqids.
@nenenindonu10 ай бұрын
@@Spartan_Disiplin The Artuqid realm doesn't stop promoting great scientists :) Biontech Ceo Uğur Şahin and nobel prize owner Aziz Sancar both have their roots from the same fertile lands
@sarubet872510 ай бұрын
@@Spartan_Disiplin I know I'm just joking.
@SteelPinguin10 ай бұрын
I cannot express how much joy this channel brought me. And fun facts for my friends 😃
@KHK00110 ай бұрын
Another great video! thank u KnG for continuing the crusade series!
@DrKarmo10 ай бұрын
I hope you guys cover the baltic, iberian and georgian front too! The second crusade is often considered a failure but it had a lot of success on the christian side
@mikemodugno587910 ай бұрын
Yeah, I agree. I would love to see these fronts.
@aamnahejjab519116 күн бұрын
it was a failure as main objectives werent achieved....CRY hard christians
@bfdiepictennisballbfdi235910 ай бұрын
10:13 There is a mistake, Ilghazi is the one who conquers Aleppo and Toghtekin is the one who conquers Homs
@ScentsOfSouthJersey10 ай бұрын
At least Roger and his knights / soldiers went out like badasses..fighting to the death surrounded and outnumbered
@Castor182910 ай бұрын
He got slashed in the face so hard that his brain was sliced in half, he went out sad if you ask me.
@ScentsOfSouthJersey10 ай бұрын
@@Castor1829 he still didn’t run away, I mean death was the end result regardless of how gruesome
@FLLCI10 ай бұрын
We were never told of this part of Turkic history at schools in Turkey. Glad this channel covers it. Thanks!!!
@sarubet872510 ай бұрын
most of the nonturk historians too mostly avoid using the word "Turk". They just slam the "saracen" or "muslim" and call it a day.
@sarubet872510 ай бұрын
@@julia2k8 Ottomans stagnated for long. But they not building anything is only true for delosate arab lands. Most of the flourishing cities, schools and architecture was located in anatolia and balkans. Plus the central asia you despise produced many mathematicians and astronomers during the golden age. Again, Timurid Renaissence is a thing. And the same CA/Turks were smart and dominant enough to create apartheid states in egypt (thrice: tolunids, mamluks and ottoman egypt) so I wouldnt flex much if I were you since your people had their peak in umayyid era and still didnt recover. Btw seeing you being fanaticly nationalist/racist for a society that would disown you for not wearing a hijab is funny. Arab e-girls and their nationalism lol.
@sarubet872510 ай бұрын
@@julia2k8 comment racism, get racism I guess.
@RichardEdwards4010 ай бұрын
@@julia2k8dont expect much from unwashed nomads other than war and raiding and sleeping with animals...
@CengizNoker10 ай бұрын
@@RichardEdwards40What you said is great. They have animals, they travel the Earth, and they are amazing warriors. They established the most empires in the world additional information. Wonderful. My dream lifestyle. At the same time, their Culture and Laws are also very beautiful, you should research them too. Can you tell me the name of your country
@ald114410 ай бұрын
I love these Crusades stories. I found I have an ancestor who died at the siege of Edessa, another in 1239 at the battle of Gaza during the Baron's Crusade, and oddly another who died a hundred years after that in the same place! Maybe my ancestors were unlucky, or just not very good fighters?😬
@ahmedkhaled871910 ай бұрын
How did you track those ancestors ?
@GAarcher10 ай бұрын
or brave
@ald114410 ай бұрын
@@GAarcher I'd like to think so. That's definitely preferable.
@silverspade839410 ай бұрын
@@ald1144 nah bro, even as a Muslim I gotta commend the sheer bravery and courage to journey across half the world face so many hardships and fight against armies who have major home advantage. I know war is bad and all that but the spirit of a warrior is still something to praise lose or win. I mean our ancestors also lost a ton during the Reconquista and thats fine the stronger side won like a wise man once said it is what it is.
@williamrobert989810 ай бұрын
@@silverspade8394hmmm I'm smelling some major dishonesty here I don't see where's the bravery in taking a journey from Europe to the holy land just so you could kill your fellow Christians alongside your enemies and make some fortune because the only reason why the overwhelming vast majority of the Crusaders left Europe was because they wanted to find a better life elsewhere 🤷🏻♂️ but hey they no longer exist in the Levant so the stronger side apparently wasn't strong enough and that's fine "it is what it is"
@b.johnathanwarriorinagarde798010 ай бұрын
It's so interesting to hear about history in this way. You guys are priceless.
@theultimatedude-q4n10 ай бұрын
That was great! Really appreciate you finally doing this battle I requested. Looking forward to more!
@brokenbridge631610 ай бұрын
It was kind of obvious from the start who would win and who wouldn't. Great video.
@xjuliussx10 ай бұрын
5:40min There is an mistake in the video - there was no battle of DARA in that location, which was the Dara battle in 530 (not 535), but in Asia Minor borders, where Belisarius fought and won against persians.
@izunauchida588510 ай бұрын
Dang, I was going to say that. Turns out, the location that was being referred to is Daraa not Dara. I hate to say this but K&G made a big mistake.
@arda21310 ай бұрын
I am having hard time believing Ilghazi having 40.000 troops. Even Great Seljuq Empire could only muster such an army in very few occasions. Even wikipedia cites an army of 20.000. This is a mere atabeg we are talking about. Do you have any sources on this?
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
The more traditional number is 15-20k. We made a mistake in the narration.
@bolubeyi895910 ай бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals ''Traditional number'' is exaggerated European sources. Atabegs are not likely to gather 15k-20k soldiers, the number of soldiers is probably 5-10k horsemen. Even Zengids could not gather an army of 15-20k.
@elvice32622 ай бұрын
@@bolubeyi8959 No, the Turks were always in overwhelming numerical superiority since they knew that 1000 knights could destroy a large army, they were shocked by the first confrontations with the Franks, I also remind you that the Turks play at home, not the Franks, so yes the Seljuks had a large reserve of men.
@bolubeyi89592 ай бұрын
@@elvice3262 Crusaders did not fight against Great Seljuk Empire's main army due to Seljuks internal problems. Clearly you dont even know what "Atabeg" title is. Even only Anatolian Seljuks killed hundreds of thousands crusaders in Anatolia. Do you think 1000 heavily armoured Frank knights can do anything to 500 light armored Turkish horse archer in openfield?
@elvice32622 ай бұрын
@@bolubeyi8959 The Seljuks of Anatolia massacred most of the unarmed pilgrims but faced with the knights they were routed as in Dorylaeum, Antioch, Hab.. It is true that the quarrels of the Turkic warlords helped the crusaders
@lpedr0l10 ай бұрын
Eustace was one of the few who took a course of action that saw a personal sacrifice for estability and greater good. Great unsung hero for that.
@DarkSasori19 ай бұрын
True, and with that in mind he truly earned the biggest sigh of relief in history when he realized that the new king had been chosen and that he could return home.
@tabibmohameddhia16599 ай бұрын
As always a great documentary from the best historical channel ever ! can't wait for more crusades videos :D
@cnw630610 ай бұрын
YES YES YES YESSSSSSS FINALLY YOU GUYS MAKING THE SECOND CRUSADE DOCUMENTARY 🤩
@RandomGuy-df1oy10 ай бұрын
over 40 thousands? It seems toooo much exaggeration. Even in Wikipedia it uses a source that states 20k
@jozzieokes342210 ай бұрын
wiki is never truly a reliable source !
@adamsnow497910 ай бұрын
@@jozzieokes3422 where are the sources for those numbers
@adamsnow497910 ай бұрын
@@EnenDjhd is this a Seljuk army or an army of a petty state in north Syria? Lol the copism of a crusader defeat makes people be so unreasonable
@sarubet872510 ай бұрын
Even Wikipedia overestimates the Turk army numbers. That makes the defeat against Turks less humiliating or victories against them sound more heroic.
@RandomGuy-df1oy10 ай бұрын
@@jozzieokes3422 Yes I know as I said even Wikipedia says its 20k. It usually has outdated sources that states higher numbers
@almighty583910 ай бұрын
Omg I’m so excited right now I’ve wanted a video on this battle by you guys for so long now! Can’t wait, I do hope we get more early big battles of the early crusades and videos on life within the crusader states
@arnavdharadhar519810 ай бұрын
It seems K&G is going to cover all the Crusades. I would appreciate it if you could also make a video on the period between the First and Second Crusades
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
This is that period
@arnavdharadhar519810 ай бұрын
@KingsandGenerals Oh! My bad. Thank you for commenting, and keep up the good work!! 😊
@hoangkimviet854510 ай бұрын
Probably it was one of the greatest defeats of the crusaders.
@lionelhutz513710 ай бұрын
@ayoubyerboub2579 Notice he said *one of* the greatest defeats. Comprehension is key.
@alqudzz-986410 ай бұрын
Kilic arslan I also gave 3 big defeates to them in crusade of 1101
@jesenjin846710 ай бұрын
Just the thing to watch while having dinner! Do continue good work
@balkangamer0110 ай бұрын
Great video.. been following this channel and all for long time… would like to see a Bosnian Crusade 1235-1241a.d. Pretty sure would be a great video from KaG channel ❤
@RangersFTW23410 ай бұрын
Phenomenal as always!! Excited to see more!!
@realbaresoles210 ай бұрын
The knight shown in the thumbnail, in a great helm (“barrel helm”) and surcoat with heater shield, is absurdly anachronistic. That’s a knight from about 150 years later (because of the ailettes on his shoulders). Knights in 1119 would look essentially identical to the knights at Hastings, although some may have mail chausses (leggings) by this period. It’s rather like doing a documentary about the 1944 battles around Caen in WWII and showing illustrations of British infantry in the Iraq War.
@realbaresoles210 ай бұрын
It appears to have been changed to a fanciful 19th c illustration. I give up. 😅
@jakekilley90378 күн бұрын
@@realbaresoles2 it was never a problem why'd you make it one ?
@realbaresoles2Күн бұрын
@@jakekilley9037 what?
@jakekilley9037Күн бұрын
@@realbaresoles2 you made something that didn't need to be, its literally a thumbnail like how are you hurt by that? your calling it anachronistic, its a thumb nail to invite people to watch it. that's as dumb as calling out every single streamer for there 900 bait thumb nails at least its related to the topic, then you degrade it comparing it to a ww2 mistake.
@wretchedegg220810 ай бұрын
Yes ! I was hoping for this series
@starhalv242710 ай бұрын
Great video, as always. On a side note, I just thought it would be quite interresting to learn about the battles from the Polish-German wars of 1003-1015, since I have no idea how both armies fought despite learning about that war in school, and I'm quite curious how Polish Druzhina could match Germans on the battlefield. It was also interresting how it was a series of conflicts, with a whole year or two between each campaign.
@jozzieokes342210 ай бұрын
keep up the great work!
@oneshotme10 ай бұрын
I enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up
@qamarahmad143210 ай бұрын
How can the battle of Ager Sanginius be considered a part of second crusade its so much time for it to officially begin in 1145 after Pope issuing bull and preaching by Bernard of Clairvaux. This was battle fought between phase of no official crusading expedition. Can you just consider battle of Hattin as part of 2nd or 3rd crusades by that ? Also Illghazi's forces could not be more than 20,000 at most. 40,000 is gross exaggeration. Roger was outnumbered but not with such a massive Margin he could have 12,000 to 15,000 troops including Turcoples and local Christian levies. Some 700-800 of them heavy cavalry knights being his trumpcard against Ilghazi's mostly light cavalry army.
@bfdiepictennisballbfdi235910 ай бұрын
Same reason they included Manzikert in their First Crusade series, they use the setting to tell more things about the region at the time
@calidone76615 ай бұрын
contemporary crusader chroniclers report about the number of Turks, however, most modern historians do not be "cautious" when it comes to number of Turks and they assume a small petty beylik in southern Turkey could raise such huge army.
@jayleeds10 ай бұрын
Quality Video K&G!
@ΑΝΑΣΤΑΣΙΟΣΤΣΙΟΤΣΙΑΣ10 ай бұрын
Excellent start of a new interesting series!!
@YoussefDaanBenAmor10 ай бұрын
Crusade’s series is finally back!
@kumebannerlord10 ай бұрын
This is lovely. I hope to see consistency from this serie, maybe 1 video per week? 😂
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
Nope. Monthly
@ItzQuantum10 ай бұрын
I love your videos, even when there are conflicting sources you take both into account and unbiasedly give us an awesome video! Love you guys❤
@JCM-jj1rj10 ай бұрын
Hi! Great vid. Can you guys make a video of Irish history specially about Brian Boru. Thanks!
@mostafa_hafiz10 ай бұрын
Awesome as usual thanks for making such amazing videos
@farazaltaf142110 ай бұрын
Thanks ❤ man I was waiting for this
@mileymarielow38507 ай бұрын
Another amazing upload from K and G's
@MultiEvil10110 ай бұрын
Another great video.
@robbabcock_10 ай бұрын
Fantastic! I can't get enough material on the Crusades!⚔🔥👏
@NB_Strikers3 ай бұрын
That is an excellent photo of the “lunatic”.
@EnclaveEmily10 ай бұрын
That intro had me hooked
@dudeboydudeboy-zj8kd10 ай бұрын
imagine you guys go insane and make one big video of the 1st-4th crusades!
@georginhoweahvic397710 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@jozzieokes342210 ай бұрын
Will your team talk about or do a future video about King Fulk ? he is a fascinating figure in history!
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
Will consider
@jozzieokes342210 ай бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals thank you for replying
@philippesauve937610 ай бұрын
My god I was waiting for the second crusade I am so happy now!!!!!
@vince_morano10 ай бұрын
Awesome as always ⚔️🛡️
@giod626610 ай бұрын
Oh, nice! Looking forward for next one! What will happen after this disaster..
@mazenaljayousi4910 ай бұрын
Great Video.. keep on old time videos 👍🏻
@Syiah-Slayer10 ай бұрын
New playlist!
@Iraqi_baathist200910 ай бұрын
Kings and general this video was amazing but i want you to do one thing in the second crusade video can you mention that zengids where irak turkmens history we arent really known i would really be happy if you mention it and at the end i want you to show a map of zengids in ther max extent 1174 when they ruled egypt thank you so much for the video and i would be delighted if you mention these or answer this comment and inform me if you do so or not
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
We will get there when we get there
@Iraqi_baathist200910 ай бұрын
@@KingsandGeneralsok thank you for replying
@aner622310 ай бұрын
5:40 - Not the same battlefield. Belisarius fought at Dara (modern-day eastern Turkey) the Daraa here is in Syria.
@janpindak795010 ай бұрын
Awesome episode
@leonardoflores794610 ай бұрын
Really well done
@londonbudgetgardner520510 ай бұрын
Excellent video Eustace wasn’t interested in the kingdom anyway.
@DAVITI1510 ай бұрын
@Kings and Generals Please make a video about the battle of Martqopi, I think this video will be very interesting.❤
@yaohuixue80402 ай бұрын
There are many series of videos, but if I want to watch from the beginning, it is hard to know which one is the next.
@Uzair_Of_Babylon46510 ай бұрын
Great video keep it up you're doing amazing things 😁👍
@jbo109210 ай бұрын
we love your vidos
@-RONNIE10 ай бұрын
Thanks for the video it was good
@rickjames1810 ай бұрын
So another crusader army was slaughtered because the nobles were inpatient? typical. I can only imagine what could be in the region if crusader forces had held out until now.
@cenktuneygok89863 ай бұрын
They are still there.
@kristian249710 ай бұрын
Hi, why did you never release the last part of the 1st crusade as a stand-alone? Prefer the small video format to the larger ones 😊
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
Algorithmic reasons, sorry. Thanks for supporting us!
@saratmodugu272110 ай бұрын
@@KingsandGeneralsis the production finished for the crusaders vs mongol series?
@napoleonibonaparte719810 ай бұрын
Ego is the downfall of these crusades.
@peruamorrortubarrenetxea530010 ай бұрын
I myself had this misconception 5:45, but the current city of Daraa, in southern Syria, and the Byzantine fortress of Dara are not the same. Dara was in what currently is Turkey, so the battle locations don't match up.
@MrSedrack10 ай бұрын
3 years later Ilgazi bit more than he could chew, in Georgia at the valley of Didgori, where his entire contingent was crushed.
@AnatolianHittite10 ай бұрын
Georgians are alive for us to laugh.I even know Georgians who say they defeated Timur. Hahaha
@MrSedrack10 ай бұрын
@@AnatolianHittite Where's Timur's "empire" now? 🤣 Ahh you sheep diddlers are all the same.
@Historyteller34610 ай бұрын
@@MrSedrackI can also say where is the glorious Georgian Empire...
@MrSedrack10 ай бұрын
@@Historyteller346 Never existed.
@Historyteller34610 ай бұрын
@@MrSedrackYeah yeah. You all claim that you controlled all of modern-day Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan but where is that glorious empire now ? It's also gone...
@theawesomeman982110 ай бұрын
Had the Crusaders not constantly warred with the Muslims and actually cooperated with one another sufficiently, their Christian nations might have survived into modern times.
@Meows21710 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@ashtonbarwick66966 ай бұрын
Whole long doc about the 2nd crusade pls?
@kyriakoskyrousis505210 ай бұрын
@KingsandGenerals Qinnasrin, modern Al 'Is was a fortress to be found south of Aleppo not to the north east. Except if you were going for Qabasin which is a township north of Al-Bab.
@neonwasabi801710 ай бұрын
Little did Ilghazi know that surprise awaited him in Kingdom of Georgia just after 2 years from this victory
@sarubet872510 ай бұрын
"muuh didgori" said the georgian nationalist whose fathers relied on Kipchak mercenaries for protection. Nice cope tho.
@neonwasabi801710 ай бұрын
@@sarubet8725 Thanx :D it did it's job though
@Castor182910 ай бұрын
But Timur Tamerlane did…
@eeeertoo25979 ай бұрын
@@sarubet8725 hilarious cope, being that you're a nationalist yourself
@briankalbfleisch107410 ай бұрын
isnt't/wssn't the city of Dara in Southern Turkey?
@Resistmediasupression3 ай бұрын
Here for 2nd crusade one question is there a episode 17 somewhere for 1st crusade after the Jihad episode
@KingsandGenerals3 ай бұрын
Nope
@vectorstrike10 ай бұрын
As usual, the person advocating for pacience is ignored... and thus disaster happens.
@superfrycook636010 ай бұрын
Roger: I have the higher ground!
@napolien13107 ай бұрын
Why do you guys call Al-Gazi and Toghtekin warlords and not princes (Emiers)?
@ruifilipegutschmidt711310 ай бұрын
Dara, were Belisarius had his great victory over the Persians, is way up north in western Mesopotamia, isn't it?
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
yep, we made a mistake
@ruifilipegutschmidt711310 ай бұрын
Ok. Nobody is perfect😉
@elvice32622 ай бұрын
It was not really a great victory since less than a year later he was defeated by the Sassanids at Callinicum.
@azzeloth936810 ай бұрын
i wish that you guys whould cover rise of serbia, nemanjic dinasty and fall at kosovo. I know that you have done the battle of kosovo. but you should do the rise of Emperor Dusan ❤
@RafaelOliveira-gl8jd10 ай бұрын
Faz um canal em outras línguas, Contrata um narrador em português brasileiro.
@MichaelSmith-ij2ut10 ай бұрын
22:51 "Is this the end of Antioch? Find out next time on Dragonball Z!"
@-NovaRoma.5 ай бұрын
5:45 i thought that the battle of dara took place at 532?
@TheAureliusRex2 ай бұрын
How many hours needs the 2nd crusade to cover the full story?
@KingsandGenerals2 ай бұрын
I think we will end up around 5 or 6
@silley1510 ай бұрын
Wait you call him a warlord... for defending his people and land from invaders, but he's a warlord. No no no my friend that's not on that
@khalilbehri543610 ай бұрын
I don't get the warlord thing . if its a guy leading an army to war then the crusader commander would be nicknamed a warlord but no he's in the video an honorable knight and great fighter i'm sure he is and i'm sure ilGhazi is as well but the warlord thing is only applied to him.
@silley1510 ай бұрын
@khalilbehri5436 I really like this channel have been watching it for years but lately iv noticed afew little one liners here and there when it comes to the Muslims. But calling him a warlord is not right at all
@Jimmyjimb12310 ай бұрын
Yup yup
@ChristopherAlfie10 ай бұрын
Moral of the story. The Cross wasn't true and there is not anything as a true cross.
@Iraqi_baathist200910 ай бұрын
İ loved the video😁 but also ilghazi was never liked by muslims because of him drinking alote and usually being drunk especially arabs where disgusted by him many arab scholors of the time talk of him as arrogant man and after weakining antioch he couldve pushed forword and conquer mor bu he went and partied and got himself drunk again
@hazzard878510 ай бұрын
So where the part at that mah boy boards the Vengeful Spirit and gets spanked by his big bro Horus?
@1BasedAmerican2 ай бұрын
Bro had 40,000 against like 7 or 8 thousand and even did terribly during the battle.. then still acted like he won some great victory after 😂😂😂 What a joke.
@SNIperofDARKness02Ай бұрын
It was not 40k, the narrator even commented it was more like 15k
@orbit189415 күн бұрын
@@SNIperofDARKness02 even 15k is exaggerated, a small beylik can't possibly muster such a force. Even the Sultan could rarely muster 20k. Realistic numbers should be around 5 to 10k at most
@zainulmuqsit8774 ай бұрын
Even the great Seljuk emperor alp arsalan fought with 20k soldiers in battle of manzikert .how an atabeg field 40k troops ? Sorry great exaggeration
@elvice32622 ай бұрын
No, the Turks were always in overwhelming numerical superiority since they knew that 1000 knights could destroy a large army, they were shocked by the first confrontations with the Franks, I also remind you that the Turks play at home, not the Franks, so yes the Seljuks had a large reserve of men
@duelinglectrics7 ай бұрын
So it was kinda like a before hattin
@kkupsky63219 ай бұрын
What? I have February 0728. One of clocks is off.
@300fusionfall10 ай бұрын
I'm a bit confused on the maps, if someone more knowledgeable can help that'd be great, but Cilicia is supposed to have an armenian kingdom in there right, I'm trying to do research on this but I can't figure out where it's placed on the map.
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
It was a semi-independent principality at this point, with various factions allying with the Crusaders and the Byzantines and even the Seljuks at times. We should show it on the map, obviously. Thanks!
@300fusionfall10 ай бұрын
@@KingsandGenerals Ok thanks, wasn't meant to be criticism by the way, was just curious because I was doing some research
@KingsandGenerals10 ай бұрын
No, it is fine to criticize
@xenon141310 ай бұрын
Waiting for the Ottoman series.
@faiyazali871910 ай бұрын
Why use word "sarasin" is being used for arab armies
@realbaresoles210 ай бұрын
Saracen is what was commonly used in Europe at the time.
@khalilbehri543610 ай бұрын
he uses the word franks many times as well so i guess its fine but then the two words are the stereotypical way both parties call their enemies and this video isnt told by a medieval historian so why not drop the nicknames all together.