AIDC F-CK-1 Ching-Kuo | Can the Indigenous Defense Fighter (IDF) of Taiwan withstand China?

We are investigating the F-CK-1 Ching-Kuo with its intriguing story and features. #fck1 #rocaf #aviation
Why did Taiwan develop a fourth-generation indigenous fighter instead of acquiring one from abroad?
Is the F-CK-1 purely indigenous?
Why did Taiwan cease the F-CK-1's production and buy the F-16 and Mirage 2000?
Does the F-CK-1 have combat value against the J-10s and J-20s of the PLAAF?
00:00 Introduction
01:09 Historical background
02:01 Programme history
06:49 F-CK-1C/D
08:12 T-5 Yǒngyīng (Brave Eagle)
08:25 Design
09:03 Combat capability and weapons (Tien Chien II - Sky Sword II - TC2 air-to-air missile / GD-53 Golden Dragon radar / Hsiung Feng II anti-ship missile / Wan Chien air-to-ground cruise missile)
10:20 Specifications
11:24 Analysis
Welcome to our channel. All the weapon systems are like books, and they tell us their stories. The Weapon Detective investigates these books, reads between the lines, analyses, and tells the untold. At the dawn of the Second Cold War, the fruits of new projects give us clues about the future. But current weapon systems also have their own stories. In our videos, you can find technical information, historical backgrounds, what happened during the development processes, combat experience and political projection. While the Second Cold War is rising, Let's investigate the weapons together.
© 大自然STEVEN, Republic of China Air Force, AIDC (Aerospace Industrial Development Corporation), Defense Visual Information Distribution Service, U.S. Department of Defense, 冠的鐵道&航空&生活記錄, Chich-Chieng Lin, Dylan Chang, Bach Cho, CTV, PeriscopeFilm, Richard Nixon Foundation, MCamericanpresident, Raytheon, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, AP (Associated Press), Northrop Grumman, Israeli Air Force, Reagan Library, U.S. Air Force, Boeign, Honeywell Aerospace, French Air and Space Force, CNN, 公視新聞網, 飛鳥飛鳥, S CHUANG.M, NCSIST, Republic of China Navy, CCTV, Republic of China Ministry of Defence, Tonkatsu298, CGTN, Submarine Force Museum, U.S. Navy, foang-zhang jian
Music: The song of the ROCAF
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
• Weapon Detective
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos
• Weapon Detective-Air
/ weapondetective
/ weapondetective
[e-mail]

[@WeaponDetective]

Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Air videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrGyENf3nqsYKC9ZkWH414k

[@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617]

🇬🇧🇹🇼🇦🇺🇯🇵 the Alliance of the isles!

[@Xentradi97]

F-CK-1? That's the greatest designation for a fighter jet, I've seen.

[@kennylee1732]

I like the F-CK-1t variant

[@1xm_mx1]

Probably means "a big middle finger to CCP China"

[@jollygoodyo]

Chinese pilot : Just splashed 1 f-ck-er 😂

[@Sodierof4tuneBabi]

coolest name ever

[@pavelimani]

Yeah fuck it baby

[@saiprateek5779]

I can't stop but be intrigued by the fact that Taiwan created its indigenous fighter aircraft in the time when no country even considered their existence.... kudos AIDC 🇹🇼👏🥰

[@adamc2378]

This was developed back in the 80's, when Taiwan was still considered one of the 4 Dragons of Asia. Those days are long gone.

[@minhtri649]

@@adamc2378 Taiwan is still an Asian Dragon.

[@ReviveHF]

Currently, AIDC and Chungshan Tech Institute are working on a new design called "Advanced Defense Fighter" which reportedly based on F35 and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet.

[@sovietheart3883]

@@minhtri649 Taiwan is part of china

[@ReviveHF]

@H L Don't worry, ROC is not going to declare Taiwan independence and PRC is not going to invade Taiwan.

[@ReviveHF]

Fun fact : This plane was developed at about the same time as the HAL Tejas. Yet, the destiny of these two planes were drastically different.

[@yutkijsamnong3202]

130 copies in 5 years what production is this ? Now upgrades to model C.

[@ReviveHF]

@@yutkijsamnong3202 Not only that, AIDC and Chungshan Tech Institute are working on follow up project called "Advanced Defense Fighter" which reportedly based on F35 and F/A-18 E/F Super Hornet.

[@ReviveHF]

@H L That's why they are making a replacement. It's the cycle. But Tejas on the other hand, is a lost cause.

[@abhi565b]

@@ReviveHF 123 Tejas on order and 30 already delivered..I don't call it a lost cause..Plus it's next version Tejas Mk2(rollout next yr) will replace mirages, mig 29s and jaguars of IAF..

[@amalsooraj4256]

@@ReviveHF Except for the timeline both Aircrafts are made for different roles and under differing circumstances. While Tejas was developed as an indigenous light fighter to replace the existing Mig 21, F Ck1 was formed as a result of China-US closeness & agreements to limit the sales of military hardware to Taiwan. Otherwise Taiwan has always been a traditional American Weapon buyer which was again evidently seen when they later brought the F16, Some of those orders ever given recently. They definitely did impressive production line with more than 130+ planes, i don't deny that, but its also true that they never had any option other than that either, If you read their history you'll find that after the limited series production, the initial order which was supposed to be given was 256, but that was dropped to present 130 as then taiwan was able to strike a deal for 150 Block 20 F16 from US. Whereas India never had that crisis even in 1980s India operated Mirages and later Mig 29s. Then we hv the aircraft technology itself the first model of F Ck 1 used American AN/APG 67 radar which is a much inferior radar compared to ELM 2032 radars of Tejas mk1 & Tejas Mk1a will hv Aesa radar. Fck1 doesn't hv air2air refueling tejas does, Fck has 6 hardpoints Tejas has 8, Fck1 range 1000 tejas 1800, fck1 weaponry limited to only American and Indigenous, while Tejas can mount Indian,russian & Israeli weapons. All while Tejas maintaining a smaller profile than fck1 in size. Both aircrafts aren't made considering same requirements and therefore different. Its easy to badmouth anything, Now your criticism of tejas probably stems frm its low production rate, IAF already has 30 tejas operational with 10 more will be delivered nxt yr. Plus IAF last yr gave an order for 83 Mk1A versions whose delivery will start frm 2024 onwards. Nations around the globe still uses 4-4.5 gen aircraft in majority& will continue till at least 2 decades, till then Tejas will never be a lost cause, it will continue serving.

[@fredtedstedman]

I have just bought a 1;48 model kit and I must say , the shapes in this plane are beautiful !

[@brothergrimaldus3836]

Who makes it?

[@fredtedstedman]

says on the box ZHENGDEFU . Made in China mine is second hand@@brothergrimaldus3836 Sorry only just found your post !

[@morrischen5777]

I'm surprised you not only introduce the international environment background at the time and you dig deep into the the political side of this indigenous development fighter program. Very impressively in depth research. Thank you as always.

[@muhammadhilmi7590]

What a beautiful aircraft! Based on the design of F-CK-1 alone, it's like F-16 and F/A-18 have a child! Unfortunately,due to political reasons,this aircraft is never exported to other countries. You're probably right. Against newest PLAAF's fighters such as J-20 and J-10,F-CK-1 probably don't stand a chance in a dogfight. But,as support aircraft, especially in air to ground/surface missions,I think this aircraft still can perform formidably and effectively. 👍🏼

[@rnzafdude]

I'd say it's closer to the Hornet's cousin lol, both are descendants of the F-5

[@minhtri649]

Based on what happened in Ukraine, we should be more skeptical about the real technology capability of countries like Russia and China.

[@goukux5908]

Its based on an F16 but with a bifurcated inlet and two engines. Strangely as soon as Taiwan completed development the US sold them F-16 fighters. I thing the IDF is used mostly as a trainer and in patrol rolls now.

[@Thect]

Taiwan is buying more F-16V, and also upgrading old F-16 to F-16V standard. We're also developing new fighter jet with two F414 and stealth features, however I think we should take the latter with a grain of salt.

[@goukux5908]

@@Thect if Taiwan can do that they will be only the third country in the world to have indigenous stealth aircraft. I don’t count Russia because there stealth aircraft suck and they have less than 10 and can’t build more.

[@idontlikecaps8823]

Me reading the thumbnail as Fuck 1 Ching Kung 😳😳😳

[@oz394]

Same lol!!

[@ren7650]

Same😂

[@andrewtaylor940]

I’m like, did they not notice?

[@luisanthonychau]

Wouldn't have clicked on the video otherwise.

[@ppn9178]

Even worse, "chinko" is Japanese kid's slang for D-CK.

[@angelarch5352]

Great video! I love seeing Taiwan's take on a jet fighter, very nice looking design.

[@doctorsoggy5563]

The IDF was seriously impressive at the time it was developed considering the context

[@pacificbrass3385]

*God bless Taiwan and the Taiwanese People.*

[@darkdragon2018]

Actually, you should call it Republic of China, cuz our country is formed by the constitution of Republic of China.

[@rick0809]

@@darkdragon2018 Taiwan is the main territory of ROC, so Taiwan can be roughly equal to ROC, unless you're one of the 140K people living in Kinmen and Matsu.

[@georgedang449]

@@rick0809 No. Their constitution claims ownership to all of China... plus all of Mongolia and parts of Russia, and specifically states Taiwan is a province in China. It specifically states that inciting independence of any province in China, including the Taiwan province, any province in mainland China, or Mongolia which it states is a province of China, is an act of sedition, and offender is to be summarily executed by firing squad. To change or amend their constitution requires agreement of other provinces in the Republic of China, which means all of mainland China and Mongolia. Go read the constitution.

[@rick0809]

@@georgedang449 I am talking about fact, not talking about constitution, the fact is the fact, fxxk the constitution!

[@rick0809]

@@georgedang449 If you really think the China mainland is STILL a part of ROC because of the unreasonable constitution, that means COVID-19 broke out from Wuhan, the territory of ROC, ROC government should take response of this tragedy, right? Isn't Wuhan the territory of ROC? But what's the fact? The fact is the China mainland is the territory of PRC, and the constitution of PRC also says Taiwan is the territory of PRC, does that mean Taiwan is a part of PRC?

[@buckstarchaser2376]

It's so... vertically compact. If it has a quick-detatch tail fin, you could potentially stack them in a carrier.

[@erniac4569]

when the enemy detects the aircraft: The FUCK !?

[@btbd2785]

it looked like it had some dna of the F20 Tigershark the F-5E and the F16 as well. Even though its an Indigenous Aircraft

[@yzj6-859]

Like the new advanced trainer aircraft (T-BE5A Yongying) of the Taiwan Air Force this time, it is not because the Italian M362 and the South Korean T-50 Golden Eagle are inferior to the T-BE5A Yongying, but because of cost and political considerations. It can reduce research and development costs, logistical burden, and revitalize Taiwan's aviation manufacturing industry, which is already on the verge of decline, because one thing must be clearly understood, whether it is F-16 or Mirage 2000, their initial design requirements are to meet the needs of the air force of the manufacturing country , After they came to Taiwan, they needed more time to adjust.

[@fightforaglobalfirstamendm5617]

Stand with Taiwan!

[@mazransamin8023]

Long live Taiwan!!!

[@kalui96]

I think it looks really good

[@trmhmt8875]

To be honest it's a good looking bird.

[@sohrabroozbahani4700]

This thing even as a second line fighter can still be used as an excellent anti cruise missile platform or do some air defence in conjunction with HAWK systems, which Taiwan has plenty, besides that, it is still a good enough strike platform with reasonable stand off reach...

[@briananthony4044]

True. For China to put boots on the ground, many ships and transport aircraft will be used. The F-CK-1 will take these out easily as long as weapon supplies last and there are places to land/takeoff from. A modern version of the F-5, is obvious from the front.

[@chrisdt2297]

Most of the HAWK system TW have were retired and replaced by the indigenous sky bow 3 system because the spare part of HAWK became increasingly harder to get and the storage are running out / failing the reliability became unbearable

[@sohrabroozbahani4700]

@@chrisdt2297 sky bow is much better but I'm not sure if it also has the electrooptical back up target accusation the later hawks had... those last batch hawks were still dangerous even after a sead mission taken their radars out...

[@muic4880]

It was supposed to be single engine like F-16, in fact planned to used the same engine. But the design were consider too good by US so they refused to export the engine forcing a change of design.

[@tranzyntheinfinitive8732]

This one should been call F/A 16 fighting hornet 😂😂😂😂

[@totalnerd5674]

This would make a great DCS mod, along with all the unique weapons

[@Ilaya593]

Very in-depth analysis of this interesting aircraft. It was interesting to note that it is 1.5 times more expensive to maintain than the F16 (?). However, no explanation was given. The Swedish Gripen is cheaper to operate than the F16, so I found that analogy intriguing. Yes, more power to Taiwan. It simply has to increase its military budget, but avoid big ticket defense items, and concentrate on asymmetric warfare. Long live freedom-loving countries like Taiwan and Ukraine!

[@Jarsia]

2 engines are all the explanation needed for increased maintenance costs

[@basilb4733]

1,5 more expensive does not seem to be correct.

[@1xm_mx1]

Makes sense to spend that much if you can't buy the F-16 or any other aircraft on par with it.

[@binarystein8077]

Because of smaller number to spread overhead cost.

[@28ebdh3udnav]

I highly suspect that american engineers helped them to design it. From what I read, we would sell them arms but what we did do is sell them the engines via civilian models and instructed them how to add an after burner to it. We couldn't sell them radar guided missiles and radar but likely helped them design their own. That's what i suspect

[@alanOHALAN]

The IDF design was under the control of the US government, its internal fuel tank was not big enough to fly over to the mainland. Its engine is from the US. US waited for it to became successful then agreed to sell F-16. The US wanted to see everybody's abilities and stop them before surpassing the US. It is trying to do the same to China but China won't listen.

[@michaelusswisconsin6002]

Looks like a mix between a F-16 and a F-5

[@syang1116]

i am a Taiwanese.. this F .. CK-1 is really an intriguing name 😊

[@habahan4257]

Another top video. Is there any record of a Chinese-Taiwanese dogfight involving the F-CK-1?

[@boomboomboom9297]

Taiwan is not a country, so nope. Unless you mean the republic of China vs the people’s republic of China, in that case, nope.

[@ShopeeMarketteam]

The last time I checked, the world hasn't been turned into a nuclear playground and the national currency hasn't been converted into bottlecaps So no, I guess there hasn't been any china-taiwan dogfights yet

[@yukin1990]

@@boomboomboom9297 Taiwan is a country, Dumbass!! But do not have any record of a Chinese-Taiwanese dogfight involving the F-CK-1.......From Hong Kong......

[@Fuxk-CCP]

​@@boomboomboom9297 台灣名稱是世界區分中共國的稱呼！

[@dennisw8166]

Beautiful aircraft.I can't help but think that the name of the aircraft means in a not- so-subtle-way; Flipping the bird

[@binjinhwang]

Do you mind to make another video on the Taiwanese HF series anti-ship cruise missile? I think that is another masterpiece of Taiwanese aerospace engineering industry.

[@WeaponDetective]

Thanks for your ineterest. We added the Hsiung Feng series to our list. We will make a video as soon as possible.

[@bennuredjedi]

The Philippines Air Force should buy these.

[@ReviveHF]

Malaysian Air Force should buy this as well because F-5E is so good.

[@TDS123ZX]

I will fly it, in my future life.

[@coffeecat4506]

Am I the only one who finds the name of it really… interesting?

[@michaelnoone9311]

I F-CKING LOVE the F-CK-1! F-CK IT!

[@Adrian-qk2fn]

One point you did not make clear in your video. Are the T5 Yǒngyīng Supersonic Advanced Jet Trainers going to be conversions of existing FC1Ks or are they going to be new build airframes?

[@zhihuan7829]

An Army spokesperson told us that it has the aerodynamic exterior of the F-CK-1, but is completely different internally from the original fighter

[@jamisonmaguire4398]

I suppose its no coincidence it closely resembles the F5E/F Tiger II. We can only hope the Taiwanese continue to manufacture cutting edge fighter aircraft at least under license however because export controls could be imposed again by the western countries it depends on.

[@binarystein8077]

During its development, many aeroframes were consideried, including large delta wing that could workout with less powerful engines, but the airforce and AIDC had experience of operating and overhauling/building parts for F-5s , similar shape was selected for less technical risks.

[@user-tv2uc2ql2r]

the tc-2a and air-launched hf-2 had been canceled during the prototype phase because of the sold approval of agm-84 and agm-88, so they are never in servoce. and also t-5 use a no ab version of f-125, called f-124, so its not going to supersonic

[@briananthony4044]

Oh, ok.

[@justacomment1657]

I always think it looks close to a twin engined F16... 🙈

[@1sfgmen]

2:31 during Reagan era, arms sales to ROC (Taiwan) got even stricter, F-20 Tigers Shark and even the downgraded F-16/J79 sales to ROC (Taiwan) was never approve by the Reagan administration. ROC (Taiwan) did got the chance to purchased 40~60 2nd hand F-21 Kfir to replace the aging F-104G before the F-CK-1 go into service, but this sales fell short to over pricing.

[@jeremycaufield8605]

Looks like a Hornet and a Falcon had a baby.

[@jimsaintamour2]

Thanks!

[@WeaponDetective]

Thanks for your support

[@stug77]

Looks very Northrup. Interested in details of technology transfer.

[@Fuxk-CCP]

J-20的推力像老牛拉車！隱形也是吹的！哈哈！山寨國製造！

[@easyganer]

Good look aircraft

[@yuymu555]

Please do a video on Gotland-class submarine

[@muhammaddaniluqman9938]

They can start develop a new type MRCA to replace this F-CK-1. Probably under designation F-CK-2.

[@Kenny_Blender]

I was working on f-ck-1 based fighter jet(vf-17) 3d model for my fictional war scenarios of my crappy fictional countries. I finished the rear sections.

[@EZ-rs5zv]

Thank you for pointing out that war between the US and China will be NUCLEAR. The best scenario is keep the status quo and avoid war.

[@chandrachurniyogi8394]

the F-CK-1 Ching-Kuo (Block III) multi role air dominance fighter should be ROCAF's first line of defense in aerial interception . . . followed by simultaneous retaliatory action by long range SAM . . . both land based & naval guided missile air defense frigates & corvettes . . .

[@SuperChodot]

Why they don't named it FCK - U just to troll Mainland.

[@brianjoy2009]

That is what I thought too. Instead of C's and D's, they should have just named them F-CK - U for the upgraded version.

[@user-ot8cg5ue3d]

@@brianjoy2009 nonono is F-CK-2

[@abcdefgh-hz6pk]

If I am correct they have very good anti Air defance system ( basically American patriot copy paste with almost same anti Air missile) plus 70 f16 block 70

[@Fuxk-CCP]

​@H L你家習犬知道你在這謊話連篇嗎？哈哈

[@ironchefa1]

Taiwan’s FCK1s are light years ahead of any airplanes from China. ❤

[@justinalgea8705]

The aircraft looks as if the f18 and f16 had a child together

[@jason8490]

You are right.when the 1988.l am high school student.first see is combined F16 and F18 and smaller.

[@ggyybagaakira]

多謝你的介紹，我是台灣人。 你的報導符合事實。 請容許我再補充一點，台灣的工程師在完成F-C-K-1所有的製造之後，由於台灣購買了F-16，這使得F-C-K-1工程師失去繼續製造新型戰鬥機的經費，導致許多優秀的工程師大量失業，許多工程師後來受聘於韓國政府，為他們設計與製造了新的教練機T-50。 台灣人對於政府不能留下人才而怨恨台灣政府。

[@comentedonakeyboard]

A reasonable hedge against a potential arms Embargo.

[@TheRandCrews]

I wish the Philippines had acquired this back in the 1990’s instead of the failed F/A-18 bid. Would’ve been more possible to still acquiring it for being cheaper and most closely aligned with a South East Asian country during the Asian Financial Crisis. But Alas Philippines still figuring out till now to get the F-16V or Gripen.

[@leandroian26]

@H L The problem is that, the country will need fighters than "rescue equipment" as they're probably the only country with no dedicated Multirole Fighter jet as they only have 12 FA-50s, which are smaller than the F-16s. Also, they'll require 3 Squadrons of it as the Philippines' Fighter Wing is somewhat being left out among its South East Asian neighbors in the fighter department, especially that the tensions with its major adversary might come closer than we think, so it's best to gear them up with the best military assets if they're to counter the threat being posed by China and other potential adversaries.

[@leandroian26]

@H L The threat of insurgents will eventually decrease. Also, the armed forces are shifting their efforts in strengthening their defense posture against external threats now as the nation is now in dire need of dedicated main assets for the defense of the nation, which include tanks, fighter aircrafts and utility aircrafts, missile defense systems, surveillance radars, and more warships.

[@leandroian26]

@H L Maybe there's no active external threat at the moment, but it's best for the Armed Forces of the Philippines to be prepared in advance in case of such scenarios, especially that China will pose a serious threat to the nation. Eventually, China will possibly attack, especially how great of a threat they can pose. Whether you like it or not, China is a great threat for the Philippine Armed Forces and to its allies. It's better to prepare than letting ourselves have lots of equipment not meant for countering enemy external forces, as they'll need necessary weapons to act as deterrence against the Chinese forces

[@leandroian26]

@H L China didn't own the South China Sea, for it is very far from the indicated Exclusive Economic Zone. China had also committed multiple violations. Also, the Philippines and the ASEAN Nations have more rights than China. So you better clear your mind

[@leandroian26]

@H L China doesn't have any historical proof for it. As for the 9 Dash Line of China, it's almost as if they merely draw it and claims it as "historical proof" even though China is faking it. The proof that the Philippines had a claim is by an old Spanish era map, which has the Philippines in its domain, which is the great proof which wins the Philippines on its Arbitration Case against China. Also, the issue of the Falklands is a different case, compared to the issue, compared to the South China Sea/ West Philippine Sea issue. So, it's too bad that you're being misinformed by the fake Chinese news.

[@mr.gamingwatchminiwargame2377]

Can’t wait for the f-ck u 2 version

[@VictorSilva-qf2tu]

Looks like a hybrid of the F-16 and F-18

[@IsaacKuo]

Anyway, the new AIDC T-5, accurately shown in this video as basically an improved F-CK-1 variant, is supposed to basically replace the aging F-5 fleet. Compared to the F-5, the new T-5 is an improvement. However, it's still an old school 4th gen design and if you look at it next to the newer and far more numerous Chinese fighter jets ... it looks pretty hopeless, doesn't it? But I think the war in Ukraine is forcing a reassessment of priorities. Advanced SAM systems and long range surface-to-surface weapon systems may be more important for Taiwan's defense, rather than trying to compete toe-to-toe with Chinese aviation in the skies. In those areas, Taiwan seems to have good systems.

[@alanOHALAN]

are you willing to die in the future war with mainland if taiwan declares independent?

[@abcdefgh-hz6pk]

Bruh the engines need to be replaced with something more powerful than 42kn

[@yutkijsamnong3202]

From view during air show it must be more than 42KN.

[@Ulatimber]

For 12tons aircraft it is more than enough

[@NeMayful]

The range is incorrect in the video -- 10:57 5,500km? This range is twice as much as the B1B bomber.

[@justsomerandomweeb9323]

B-1B has a max range of 12,000km tho

[@NeMayful]

@@justsomerandomweeb9323 You are be right, and this depends on the task. I just searched on Wiki and B1B's Max range is 12000km (I guess without any weapon load), and 9400Km with 37k lb weapon load, while its combat range is around 5500km. My comment was incorrect. At the same time, Ching-Kuo shouldn't have 5500Km range for sure. 1200Km might be a better number.

[@u.nforcesalx9892]

Love it's capabilities Hate it's name

[@scekiller]

In fact in Taiwan we all use IDF (Indigenous Defense Fighter) to call it. F-CK-1 only appears in the file.

[@misha791]

Taiwan need submarines and rotational expeditionary air force with joint training with the Philippines and U.S. Have units outside the country for a secondary counter strike missions anticipating invasion from the PLA.

[@zzxxz2345]

@H L 法理與事實不同，如果你了解近代中國政權變更的歷史

[@zzxxz2345]

@H L 你說的我承認,世界大部分承認PRC取代ROC,但也如你所說ROC還在台灣，所以事實是兩岸各治互不隸屬。

[@asfsafa8448]

@H L 發動內戰的是誰啊?不就是那個在抗日對戰時，扯國民黨的黃俄支那嗎?抗戰打完，黃俄支那就開始搞革命，哈哈，只會偷換概念，共慘黨的標準套路。

[@asfsafa8448]

@H L 那你們就趕緊打過來，到底是誰的政權會先被打破，還不知道ㄟ，加速清零吧。

[@asfsafa8448]

@H L 哈哈，你家毛主席都承認自己是靠日本人的幫助才起來的，還感謝日本欸，我是不知道哪來的臉，說國民黨發動內戰。

[@user-nv1gm2zj7y]

f18 body with f 16 cockpit wings and tail

[@Ulatimber]

This is such a great aircraft has rafel's air intakes f18's wings 😅

[@Helmet-Amiya-Donky]

Some elder Taiwanese said that US government relaxed restrictions on selling F-16 and Mirage2000 is a conspiracy from US government. Because ROC government reduced output of IDF and bought F-16,Mirage 2000. The most important of all is ROC government cut expenses for developing more aircrafts for ROCAF, and many staffs left for South Korea . I heard ROC want to team up with South Korea to make fifth-generation jet fighter for ROCAF but I am not sure it’s real or not.

[@shengchelin6462]

rellay

[@Helmet-Amiya-Donky]

@@shengchelin6462 I am a Taiwanese so I am sure about that.

[@annoyedcat9291]

Fill in the blanks: F_CK 🤣

[@skyw4lk3r48]

When F-18 have a baby with F-16

[@ROCAF-TurboFanEngine]

欣慰

[@Jarsia]

Looks like an F5 and an F18 had a baby Also I can't be the only one that just calls it "fuck 1"

[@emmanuelgraphic22]

the air intake makes me see the rafale...😮

[@josephcruz7936]

Twin engine, prettier, F-16

[@myplane150]

As an American, I am fine with the use of the metric system for size but can you please, in future videos, add the pounds of thrust for the engines (I know, we're weird)? I have no idea what the conversion is from Kn (outside of looking it up). Thanks...☺

[@alexlo7708]

KN = 980 kg and equal 980 x 2.2 pound.

[@yukin1990]

During my study in the US, i am always bother why you guys never change to the metric system?? Almost all of them in the earth use the metric system..........

[@molochi]

@@yukin1990 we were on our way to doing so, then Reagan made an executive order in the early 80s abolishing our conversion process to metric. they took down all the dual signage. smh.

[@yukin1990]

@@molochi well....why...

[@molochi]

@@yukin1990 Why? Probably something ideologically linked to thinking that the 1950s represented "best 'Murica."

[@derekedwards5817]

A cross between an F-16 & F-18

[@wellggbro3961]

looks like this Aircraft was heavley influenced by F-16!

[@TheNewOrder-DaysOfConflict]

F-5 and F-16 has a child...

[@Ade-mu4zn]

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

[@Ade-mu4zn]

🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩

[@user-dt5nb5sh9v]

Unlike Chinese planes, the F-CK-1 is a very reliable plane according to its service record in the past three decades!

[@jonathandiaz4997]

6 months ago

[@leonardonogueira2647]

Make a video about embraer/aermacchi AMX and Embraer Super Tucano, please

[@WeaponDetective]

Her is our Tucano video. We hope you wii enjoy it kzbin.info/www/bejne/Zpanf4uFdtRogJI

[@yasirurooj8749]

F-16 and jf-17 combination or look alike

[@JohnLee-db9zt]

😂 I can’t stop laughing at the name of fighter😂

[@carloschu7127]

I am actually reading the hillarious comments.

[@boomboomboom9297]

The official name of the Taiwanese Army academy is called the Chinese Military Academy. Most Taiwanese high ranking officers are 2nd generation mainlander who don’t see themselves as Taiwanese and they despise pro-independence Taiwanese activists and the Taiwanese language( a Chinese dialect from Fujian province by the way). Back in the 60s, they would get pissed when foreigners called their country Taiwan.

[@eechoylee6532]

Send All These Cheenas Back to China

[@doppelganger9714]

Its an F5-E but in steroids...

[@IsaacKuo]

I'm pleasantly surprised to hear my name "Kuo" pronounced correctly. For so many years, I gave up on trying to explain the "kwah" pronunciation. I just tell people "quo" as in "status quo". My father's Taiwanese, but very much hates the KMT, obviously including the F-CK-1's namesake Chiang Ching-Kuo. I remember back before the democratic revolution, for some reason we got a shiny brochure in the mail with color pictures of the F-CK-1 jet fighter. I just thought it was a cool looking jet fighter, but my dad looked at it like ... well he didn't literally spit on it, but I could tell that's how he felt.

[@alanOHALAN]

why did he hate the KMT?

[@robertgretter9452]

Yes

[@SonyJimable]

F-CK Yeah!

[@djlim4612]

nice fighter aircraft but couldn't they gave it a better designation. It's just one letter away from a "french" swear word.

[@AwesomeNinja1027]

I misread the title as F@CKING Kuo.

[@questtech2698]

are they running out of creativity to name their planes? AAM F-CK-u2 ASM F-CK-u3

[@josephtempongko8914]

This Taiwan fighter designation is almost like “F**K” - 1. What a name???? Come in F**K 1. Roger, Roger this is F**K 1.

[@rambo410]

An F18 copy with a single tail

[@IamJustAli]

They should have picked a different name for this plane.

[@Hauwlah812]

Why they name it 🦆 1?

[@nikhildeshmukh3709]

This aircraft looks like the underdog that can prove to be the top gun in a close-quarters knife fight with even the mighty F15 screaming eagle which might just be left screaming obscenities when the FCK1 makes it realize that it's just FCked lmao who chose the name for this fighter anyways I just love it!

[@mrhassan2024]

🇨🇳❤️❤️❤️👍

[@aluxtaiwan2691]

At "Current day" there's really nothing to be proud of this jet. But the the name F-CK-1 really just a big hidden joke left by engineer who see the opportunity and took it. (Back in 80s aircraft engineer are probably the few Taiwanese who can read English.)

[@hugocheng6243]

經國號其實到今天都還是很不錯的，能發展成一個自稱體系的載台不多了，重點是便宜可靠，非常適合經濟體量小的國家用於自衛，如果可以出口給阿根廷應該能輕易打敗競選中的三種機型

[@aluxtaiwan2691]

@@hugocheng6243 在當時的各種狀況為前提下產出，的確是很出色的戰機，但國家後來對於整個計劃的不重視程度，以至於後來的延壽計畫都沒辦法跟上時代，而也因為當時的各種限制使F-CK天生的改裝彈性就很小(為了盡可能的輕量化由於兩顆極度無力的發動機)，所以的確在"Current day"它已經沒任何可以說嘴的能力了，就如ME262雖然擁有第一台實戰噴射機的頭銜，但其能力在現代沒有任何優勢。

[@hugocheng6243]

@@aluxtaiwan2691 看定位看用途吧，經國號推力是真的不怎麽樣沒錯，但是你看俄烏戰爭那些用俄系發動機的推力講出來大到嚇人，打起來笑死人，防空被烏克蘭米格29追著打，實際點來說經國號是reliable and capable ，台灣要找到一款取代他定位的就算可以買，市面上還真的不多

[@aluxtaiwan2691]

@@hugocheng6243 推力不是萬能但沒推力萬萬不能，低推力以及為了解決低推力所設計的緊湊結構使得F-CK改裝淺力很小，連增加油箱也需要再三考慮，改更大的發動機也有難度(不過主要還是買不到)。F16還是在各方面站上風包括各種後勤和成本，不過F-CK在改裝和使用的政治限制上的確比較小。 其實由於當下險峻的政治環境F-CK的設計限制太多，未來注定無法在上面大改特改，它應該是未來更先進的國產戰機實踐的墊腳石，但沒想到在有了F16之後石頭也沒再往上疊了。

[@hugocheng6243]

@@aluxtaiwan2691 我覺得這也是沒有辦法的事情，畢竟大推力發動機為前提，拿不到或是做不出來什麼都不用想了，所以說這個真的不要自責，像韓國日本也都是拿到美國發動機為前提才能去開發新一代戰機，我覺得台灣屬於非戰之罪，不要過分苛責，往好處想我們在這個平台上開發了各種國產彈藥，天劍一天劍二，反輻射飛彈，萬劍彈等等…也不是沒有在點技能樹，發動機雖然限制了台灣開發新戰機但是中科院並沒有因為這樣就就停下腳步

[@user-my9go3km9h]

FCk-1應研改為AI 無人機 向美國租購F15 F18

[@yeetian2774]

Amazing name….F-ck……

[@markluther6074]

Isn't this just an F5

[@charleslanceb.delarosa2255]

why I'm reading it like fuck 1 ching kuo