Russian Glide Bombs Vs American JDAM | How it Works

[@Aitelly]

Please Subscribe!

[@hishamenlightenedmohamed9696]

MAKE A VIDEO ABOUT "SUKHOI 34"!!!!!

[@Tiagomottadmello]

Awesome 👍🏻👍🏻. Would have been nice If the vídeo told us about that Russian bombs' weird tip...

[@obvFire]

@AiTelly why is ur name the same as a Minecraft bridging method (without the "Ai")?

[@ThanhNguyen-ik3jn]

@@Tiagomottadmello- Pu gặp hề là tắt điện

[@carkawalakhatulistiwa]

Make video about Russia jamming US GPS weapon

[@MrSuba47]

Those guided FABs cost even less since there are millions of stockpiles left from 40-70 years ago, only slight refurbishment is necessary and mounting of UMPK kit and it is good to go, that is why are used so much even for small costly target as trench positons. And one more thing, there are many variants of each weight of type of bomb like ОДАБ (fuel air/thermobaric most deadly against living targets and multiple times more deadly than TNT), ЗАБ (incendiary), ФЗАБ (High explosive incendiary) and many different types, soviet engineering ain't just shovels and rocks like many people in west think, and all of these types can be used easily wth each UMPK kit as necessary, with low price.

[@bombarderoazul]

Russians have so many FABs, on average they drop 100 to 150 bombs on Ukraine every single day, and have had a very demoralizing and damaging effect on ukrainian army

[@JochenRU]

Советский подход к тому, что вооружение не должно быть "золотым" (его придерживались не всегда, но очень часто), оказался правильным. Побеждает экономика. Осознание того, что ФАБ-500 будет прилетать ОЧЕНЬ много, возможно, отрезвит ряд горячих голов в НАТО, если вздумают войти на территорию 404 официально.

[@ДмитрийУсольцев-ы7у]

@@JochenRU это верно. Взрывчатка делается с использованием толуола, а тот в свою очередь является побочным продуктом в металлургии. Почему ЧВКа НАТО стали использовать массово квадрокоптеры? Острый дефицит взрывчатки, я так предполагаю.

[@yushinima]

@@JochenRU не забывай что тот же петриот собьет твою срушку-34 еще на расстоянии 160км поэтому ни 1 КАБ не летит на Киев, и скоро приедет еще 1 установка пак2 из германии и будет стоять в Харькове

[@hollister2320]

@@JochenRU oh yeah? How’re the half a million dead boys of yours feel about that?

[@hyy3657]

UMPK might look rough, but resembled typical Russian methodology: simple to manufacture & maintenance, cheap to mass produce, useful it's good enough.

[@Илья_Голем]

Exactly, JDAM looks so much more stylish, but keep in mind UMPK is basically Russia's first experience in that field

[@Vsor]

They are both bolt on systems, the us one is just a little more aerodynamic. They also both cost the same.

[@Янус_Ырт]

​@@Vsor you sure they cost the same?

[@Vsor]

@@Янус_Ырт More or less, you need to take into account something called 'purchasing price parity'. Before the war, the ruble could buy around 25%-50% more than its exchange rate would suggest. Since the beginning of the war that number has become very difficult to calculate, but most of these system were made before the war anyway.

[@dadistos4538]

@@Янус_Ырт a difference of around 10k is really nothing, like seriously, when talking about government's wallets.

[@rajaydon1893]

They have also added rocket booster to the fab 500 which drastically increases its range

[@Aitelly]

Really

[@mr.markovnik3058]

It's will make bomb visible for aa rocket and increase weight

[@rajaydon1893]

@@mr.markovnik3058 they dont seem to care, they know somthing we don't

[@commenter648]

you must be talking about grom e2 and e1

[@dinocrisis2291]

i think it just applied for fab 250 now and it said to be can go around nearly 100km after deploying from aircraft. they just use to boost the bomb range while gliding, not like missile or rocket a bomb really hard to intercept (so better choice is intercept the aircraft than bomb itself).

[@martinivanov5617]

you forgot to mention fab 3000

[@Aitelly]

That will require another video

[@dilanmukidisi4lanz986]

Soon brother

[@TheGrindcorps]

Not to mention FAB-5000, the father of all FABs 😮.

[@Marcellogo]

Still not actually seen in action: instead there is the newly produced Drel and the UMPK version of the thermobaric ODAB and cluster RBK bombs. The great news is instead the apparition of a completely different new family of bomb, the UMPB D-30SN . It's seems that in this case the bomb is fully modular and could come with an jet engine for aerial use and/or with a rocket propeller allowing it to be launched from Smerch MRLS. What I can say is that the pictures it look absolutely neat looking, very streamlined and compact, way different from the "ugly dickling" (but being the "son" of the Hellduck itself no one would care) UMPK.

[@asavelakuse6865]

Still in development but testing results are promising. Ukrainians are bout to be buried in their bunkers if the 500s are causing the 3000 will feel like an earthquake.

[@pepitopalotes5608]

The cost comparison is much more in favor of the FAB as the Russians have huge stocks of dumb bombs, so basically the incremental cost of an additonal FAB is the guidance kit. In this case, incremental cost (the cost of making one more unit) is more useful than the total full cost.

[@rmdomainer9042]

US have a lot of dumb bombs too and the JDAM is also just a guidance kit.

[@Aitelly]

it's neutral i guess

[@ImBigFloppa]

America has literally millions of Mk80 bombs in storage. The cost advantage is very much in America's favor, as despite having probably a larger paper cost, the far larger, and richer American economy allows for an absolute shit ton of JDAMs to be built a year.

[@stream2watch]

@@ImBigFloppa This. I wrote something about that but got deleted. Vatniks just can't grok. I wonder how many 155mm are in storage in desert ammo dumps and on pacific islands. Maybe 5 million.

[@JuniorSmith-truthseeker]

​@@ImBigFloppaok america is the best at everything and have the most of everything 😂

[@reynardus1359]

You're completely off the mark on the guided FAB-500 cost. The conversion kit costs about 300,000 rubles - at the current conversion rate that comes to about $3500. Russia has 10's of thousands of these bombs in storage. Your figure comes from the BBC contributor Professor Bronk of the Royal United Services Institute, a UK think tank. And he cites no source other than his pants. He's simply trying to justify the cost charged by his handlers for the comparable domestic munition.

[@willietorben560]

"The conversion kit costs about 300,000 rubles - at the current conversion rate that comes to about $3500." - presuming RU economics is stil working in any regular way. It doesn't. What matters is the raw resources it consumes, labour cost, manufacturing capacity, etc. For example, how quickly can 10's of thousands of GLONASS (if it is indeed GLONASS, but I think it is confirmed) kits? Its not like Putin could order stuff on Amazon or go to Zürich and get a loan, even getting to RU overseas accounts is tricky. And now they're including significant amounts of crypto too. So it is probably easier to approach this in terms of manufacturing capacity than of monetary value. "The conversion kit costs about 300,000 rubles" - but whose pants were the source of this? Putin's? Russian State accounting? If so, then you should not call other people names. These bombs still can only destroy. To take what he wants, Putin needs soldiers, roughly 2 million of trained troops given most Ukrainians have survived and even the paramilitaries are veterans by now. What Putin has so far is less than a million Volkssturm with Trumpmobiles and the occasional real military vehicle. Few T-80, fewer T-90, T-72 getting less maybe but so far no mass deployment of T-55 except Krynky maybe (they died). As for trained Russian fighters, they now start losing them even in Chad, and the MoD even dissed Wagner for it on social media and now wants to send some of their few remaining crack soldiers to seize the opportunity and make the Mai junta THEIR b*ch... oh well this is what happens when you masturbate over your cooked-up books. Children should not be permitted to play at war, or the berbers will come at night and feast on their livers. Did the transfer of power on Grey Zone go alright? Rest in Pieces, man. It must have been fun while it lasted.

[@romanz9342]

@@willietorben560wow, what a flow of cosmic energy😂

[@reynardus1359]

@@willietorben560 Nice propaganda essay, clown. Ask the Ukrainians if the Russian electronics is working.

[@reynardus1359]

@@romanz9342 It was all pent up like diarrhea until he let it all go.... 🤡

[@Petrovich124]

@@willietorben560 ))))))))))))))) вы серьёзно? Вы верите, что нужна экономика США и высокие технологии типа 4нм чтобы сделать модуль? Разочарую - там нет высоких технологий кроме математики, физики, паяльника и сварочного аппарата, ну в США еще доходность элит ….

[@hanbyeongyeob]

미국 폭탄 : 도입가와 운용유지비가 고가이다. 대량 생산이 불가하다 러시아 폭탄 : 도입가와 운용유지비가 저가이다. 대량 생산이 가능하다

[@asterklaster7575]

FAB500 est price 300k RUB or 3200$ + 50% price of Guidance kit. about 5000$ for bomb not 25 000

[@василийтцай]

Они в складах валяются, они бесплатные

[@БорисБалалайкин-м4ю]

@@василийтцай Ну так склады не вечные, после окончания сво определённо придётся чет решать с поредевшими запасами.

[@olegvorobev-bx5es]

америкосы как всегда в уши льют))

[@olegvorobev-bx5es]

@@БорисБалалайкин-м4ю Там на третию мировую запасов хватит)) СССР строгал их как пиражки))

[@diviksophistrum5466]

​@@БорисБалалайкин-м4ю Понятно, что будут просто продолжать (их производство никогда не останавливалось, правда объемы сократились, чем во времена СССР/ холодной войны), производить все это и снова забивать ими склады. Лет за пять, ну может десять, восполнят полностью все растраченное на СВО. Думаю, даже не 10 лет, именно лет за пять снова на складах будет лежать не меньше, чем было до СВО. Естественно, сильно много направлять на военку средства бюджета - это ущерб гражданской экономике...но что поделать, такие времена, и эти времена, увы, надолго.

[@xfxox]

$24k is nonsense, the bomb itself costs $3k and wing kit is $1.5k, totalling $4.5k

[@dzonikg]

No way its only 1.5 k ,like its price off graphic card

[@JuniorSmith-truthseeker]

Thought i was the only one seeing this guy trying to make it close to american price 😂

[@j.k.1239]

The bomb is free inherited from Soviet union.The only new thing is the kit which likely cost $500 at best.

[@xfxox]

@@dzonikg Monthly payment for 2-bd apartments in Moscow is $700

[@soulxtr]

@@xfxox $ 70 if it's your apartment

[@yurikponomarioff]

The difference is in the principles of creating weapons. Russian - must be done as efficiently as possible at minimal cost. American - you need to make something that can be sold at a high price.

[@nalendrapermana4831]

Russian : make great leader happy for performances American :make democrat leader happy for high fees....

[@ivanstepanovic1327]

GLONASS is nearly impossible to jam. So even if we take it for granted that GPS is more accurate, it means little if you are jammed. And a lot of Ukrainians (and Russians) claimed that JDAMs miss most of the time...

[@Aitelly]

Hmmm

[@deipalladium8362]

You can jam everything. But not everywhere and not everytime you have needed equipment.

[@backpackpepelon3867]

GPS kinda bit outdated compared to Beido now, but its an older system to begin with.

[@WarlordEnthusiast]

Is that a joke? GLONASSs reception is spotty at best, aside from that it uses virtually the same tech as GPS. If GPS can be jammed, so can GLONASS.

[@KSmithwick1989]

What are you talking about, the GLONASS array is not even from a consistent generation. Russia lacked proper funding so it's a mix of K and M generation satellites. Also what technical reason are you basing that assumption on. Other than people claiming it's harder to jam.

[@borismedovar9968]

0:02 fun fact : jdam is a soviet era weapon too.

[@Aitelly]

It's a Cold War Era Weapon

[@antediluvianatheist5262]

@@Aitelly The cold war never ended. The west simply lost.

[@theidiotictroublemaker2281]

@@Aitelly which was when the Soviet union was still alive?

[@sumnerencarnacion8279]

@Aitelly It's the same thing

[@yujinhikita5611]

@@theidiotictroublemaker2281 soviet era if its soviet, cold war era if its western.

[@ИльяСачков-ы3х]

Main feature of УМПК (unificate module of flying and aiming) is connected to any old bomb by simple metal bends, and make scrap from old storage in deadly modern weapon. And here in Russia, we have crazy amount of old bombs of different kind.

[@vladod.6220]

@@ИльяСачков-ы3х , у нато больше запасов.

[@SekedarInfo-excalibur]

Next : krasnopol vs excalibur

[@RustedCroaker]

krasopol more of equivalent for copperhead then excalibur

[@j.k.1239]

"US gave up sending Ukraine $100K Excalibur shells, rarely hit targets: report"

[@j.k.1239]

@@RustedCroaker excalibur has been a failure so far because of gps jamming.

[@zulfanirich7594]

​@@j.k.1239US has no equivalent to russian EW

[@zygmuntperbish]

​@@zulfanirich7594 как и вообще ПВО, ещё против советских ракет в Ираке Пэтриоты плохо себя показывали, про бред, что они могут сбивать гиперзвуковые ракеты в Украине вообще молчите). Пускаем десятки БПЛА по Киеву, видим откуда по ним стреляют Пэтриоты, пускаем по Пэтриотам гиперзвуковой Кинжал и ракета прилетает прямо в точку. Если ваши системы не могут сбить иракские и хуситкие ракеты, то о каком гиперзвуке может идти речь.

[@ssh9342]

1:12 FAB is not only Highly Explosive in russian: Фугасная Авиа Бомба - Highly Explosive Aircraft Bomb

[@МаксимМ-р7и]

Highly

[@danielgyepes1190]

For those who are interested in how to say it, its: Fugasnaya Avia Bomba

[@325student]

Я бы перевел как - aircraft bomb

[@bruskqadir6208]

The key difference is that the american jdam is exclusively used against innocent children and women in Palestine while the russian one is used against the westren criminal thugs!!

[@straight_intro]

​@@325studenthigh-explosive aerial bomb

[@TheGrindcorps]

UMPK FAB combo is far superior. They have superior range and more types of bomb options to mix and match. They are mass producing UMPK for up to FAB 3000 and are even working to get FAB 5000 UMPK rolling out soon. In addition it is compatible with all the thermobaric equivalents of FAB series such as ODAB 1500 and more.

[@apolloaero]

It has more limited launch parameters, such as 16k feet launch ceiling. It's not superior at all. They're also more inaccurate. As for being mass produced or whatever, we already have over half a million JDAMs, no reason to mass produce yet. Welcome to the 90s, when this tech became more prominent

[@TheGrindcorps]

@@apolloaero The USSR and Russia had it back then too though. They got raped with shock therapy from America so lost at least 15 years recovering. America who was unopposed for 20-25 years and had essentially unlimited resources has not gotten that much further than Russia, particularly when yo Lu factor in the military budgets. Even China who only spends 1/4 to 1/3 of what America does on military is close to catching up and will surpass the USA by 2035-2040. They came from decades behind the USA on military technology just a decade or two ago. I have to imagine that without the complete breakup of USSR and such extreme measures by America to attack decimate Russia in the non military really the USSR or combined successor would significantly ahead of the USA at this point at the very least militarily. They would probably even be ahead of all if NATO both in terms of technology and production numbers. America, the EU and western NATO countries have been completely imploding, especially in the lead five years. Can you imagine an Eurasian block with all the former USSR and China? By the time USSR collapsed, relations with China were on a trajectory to be where they are between China and Russia now. Russia and China do a whole lot more than USA and NATO with a whole lot less. If NATO and “Pacific NATO” had to fight Russia and China in a conventional war they wouldn’t even have any weapons left to fight with at this point. The west is in decline and their time is up. The future is in Asia, Africa and South America!

[@JohnJones-k9d]

@@apolloaeroa 1500 kg bomb does not need to be that accurate, so your point is irrelevant. FAB is a game changer JDAM has been proven to be irrelevant, only good at killing women and kids in Gaza(against a foe who can’t fight back). Plus Russia is jamming Western GPS.

[@mauser98kar]

@@apolloaero First time I hear about 16000 feet ceiling, TBH. If this was the case, they would've been converting Su-24s en masse for UMPK use to increase their striking capabilities. Yet they only use Su-34s, which has, I think, almost twice the ceiling of Su-24 (10k-is vs 20k-is). Makes no sense. As for accuracy - its improving. It was used to be around 50%, and often a target would receive up to 4 bombs targeting the same area just to be sure. Now there are more and more examples of single UMPK-kitted bombs being used on a single target or entire barrage designated to several areas (like strongpoints along a trenchline) with high effect. They still seem to have worse CEP compared to JDAM, but they've markedly improved since the first introduction almost a year and a half ago. And with a new type of glider bomb being introduced recently, Russians are seem to aim at improving the accuracy even more. You also miss a very important factor - unlike JDAM, UMPK is truly universal, just as U strands for. 3 variants for 3 bomb calibers (250, 500, 1500 kg), each able to fit practically any type of bomb in-caliber. Be it high-drag, low-drag, HE, HE-frag, thermobaric or cluster, with optional aerodynamic hood for high-drags. And technically, the kit could fit literally any bomb of said calibers, even those that are not used right now. Simply put - it is much more versatile compared to JDAM. And its cost, given Russians mostly used old stocks, is in practice even less than stated in this video. And it requires less work to be installed. If we discard lesser accuracy (and range on some variants), UMPK is objectively superior to JDAM-ER.

[@apolloaero]

@@mauser98kar probably has to do woth logistics and existing infrastructure, and the Su-34 is probably the more survivable platform. Also, if you noticed, russia is also using low-level bomb runs. These aircraft are flying at low altitude before making a quick climb to release their payload, then quickly flare, turn back and continue to fly low. They're not flying high due to the SAM threat. All bomb and missile releases have launch parameters btw As for accuracy, there's a reason they're focusing on the FAB-3000 and are using FAB-1500 more. It compensates for the larger CEP. JDAM is a kit that's placed on existing bombs. They are used on Mk 82/83/84 bombs, which are all different sizes, ranging from 500 lbs to 2000 lbs. The GBU-31 uses the Mk 84, for example, a 2000 lb bomb. However, it can also use thr BLU-109, a bunker-buster. And since we don't use cluster bombs anymore, there's a version with the BLU-136, basically airburst fuze with high fragmentation. For the GBU-38, you have a version with a composite case that disintegrates when it explodes, this is a low collateral version of the 500 lb bomb. GBU-54/55/56 add laser guidance to GPS/INS guidance. As for launch parameters, they're less strict. An F-22 managed to launch a 1000 lb GBU-32 at speeds of mach 1.5 at an altitude of 50k feet, and still hit its target over 40 km away. As you can see, the versatility is there. So no, the UMPK is not better.

[@Zen-f8q]

No, according to the Collective West leaders, its da Russian shovel not a glide bomb.

[@Военныесводки-б7к]

Ukrainian soldiers don't think so

[@geofflepper3207]

Why are Russian trolls so obsessed with shovels? That's not normal. Even more strange is telling the world that you are obsessed with shovels. For your own sake stop doing that.

[@Влад-п6п7щ]

Лопата работает😂!

[@park1776]

metal pipe.vaw

[@hidden6906]

ахахаха это лопата может вам вырыть большую яму

[@Gumirishche]

Было бы интересно увидеть видео про объёмно детонирующие боеприпасы(ОДАБ или ракеты к ТОС). Само видео очень интересное. Хотелось бы добавить, что система УМПК ставится и на другие виды авиационных бомб таких как: РБК - разовая бомбовая кассета(кассетная бомба), ОДАБ - объёмно детонирующая авиационная бомба(термобарическая бомба). Также видел материалы, где к бомбам с УМПК приделывают разгонные двигатели для увеличения дальности полёта.

[@МаксимМ-р7и]

КаССета.

[@Gumirishche]

Пасиб

[@mnztr1]

The ODAB 500 is more powerful then the FAB1500 ....and there is an ODAB 1500 😵😵

[@АльбертТуманов-ы6ы]

@@mnztr1 не мощнее просто поражения пехоты выше

[@vanpetr18]

@@mnztr1 ОДАБ это аналог солнцепека в виде бомбы. У него сплошной радиус поражения, но особо ничего не пробивает.

[@danielle_pine9676]

I love your videos guys. Short. Easy to understand and good animations. Keep up the good work

[@Aitelly]

Thanks 🙏🏻👍🏻

[@vladivanov9082]

​@@Aitellyотличная работа!

[@regenwurm5584]

Do the ODAB-1500.

[@vitamina-7536]

Очень опасная бомба!

[@AL66WV]

@@vitamina-7536 кстати, на счёт одаб-1500, на тех фото где говорится что это она показана бомба рбк-500 с умпк, + американцы дважды пытались создать такую же бомбу (blu-73 и blu-96) весом более тонны, но это не увенчалось успехом потому что топливовоздушная смесь сгорала не полностью, даже на видео видно. Я думаю что создание ОДАБов массой более 500 кг физически невозможно по той причине что невозможно рассеять и правильно зажечь такое большое количество топлива, и главное чтобы оно именно сдетонировало, а не сгорело. Что думаете ?

[@muhcharona]

Jdam is being jammed so there's that.

[@radbilcz]

:D glonas is not drowned out and more accurate

[@ryangowen2816]

Well it also has inertial guidance (as mentioned in the video), so it doesn't have to rely on GPS.

[@АлександрМотлахов]

ГЛОНАС тоже глушится. Я Русский и мы прекрасно понимаем, что необходимо движение вперёд в этих технологиях ибо именно мы показали своё превосходство в РЭБ, но теперь запад демонстрирует, как умеет быстро учиться. Но наш суммеречный гений не спит🤫 новые сюрпризы на подходе, а уж про военную школу тактической и стратегической войны, вообще не говорю... Нечего было зазнаваться.

[@radbilcz]

@@АлександрМотлахов На самом деле это просто разрушение старых систем, которые проталкиваются на Украину. Украина недавно получила некоторое вооружение с запада и показывает, что может уничтожать российскую технику. Как известно, лучшие игрушки предоставлены сами себе

[@SuperDrake85]

It's interesting. The susceptibility to jamming and interference of the GPS guidance system is an important limitation to consider. And its one that can only really be discovered and rectified by way of real world combat experience. It would be a very interesting and exciting time to be a defense contractor. A feast of information and new puzzles to solve.

[@OrekhovSD]

Russia already use an upgraded version of glided bomb called UMPD D-30. It have engine to accelerate and more accurate than Fab-500

[@lovepeace9727]

There's also a KAB-500, which is a laser guided version of that bomb, good at destroying moving targets.

[@Aitelly]

Yes I read about it

[@KSmithwick1989]

KAB-500 is not the same bomb, they were a purpose designed system. Although Russia resorted to modifying unguided FAB-500s after production failed to meet demand. In fact FAB is the Russian designation for gravity bombs. It's not actually the name of the modified bombs with UMPK glide kits. Which creates confusion, the actual name is FAB + (weight class) + (sub-variant).

[@Aitelly]

@@KSmithwick1989thanks for the Indo we learned a lot today

[@AndreyPetroff]

@@KSmithwick1989 The KAB-500 is not a bomb, but a family of bombs with laser, optical and satellite guidance.

[@KSmithwick1989]

@AndreyPetroff Yes, it's the same bomb, although with a difference guidance package. The US SDB-1 follows the same concept.

[@Itoyokofan]

What really stunned me about UMPK is that the wings doesn't have a fancy mechanism to unfold. Rather they're held with a pyrobolt and unfold with a spring. Looked like egineering with 100% 🧠 to me 😂

[@РусланМетелкин-л2к]

everything ingenious is simple

[@officer4129]

The wings open with the help of a small explosion of a pyrotechnic element. This can be seen in the video of the bom being dropped.

[@Itoyokofan]

@@officer4129 if there's no spring, just a pyrobolt that's 200% 🧠

[@кириллЧе-ш8ц]

Чем проще-тем лучше и надежнее,зачем усложнять

[@shuninv]

Эльфам нравится, эльфы не возражают))) особенно ФАБ 1500

[@zov-fv9vj]

😂💯

[@user_arbuser_01]

Когда говорят эльфы, я вспоминаю эльфов из мульта "Ронал-Варвар". 😂😂😂

[@СергейСорокин-е6у3я]

​@@user_arbuser_01 эльфы из "Разочарования" 🤔

[@benhaloho8231]

Do you have a video on how signal jamming work? Russia is making these JDAMs into overpriced dumb bombs these days.

[@Aitelly]

Not yet will do our research

[@sebastiaanl9876]

Use Ai gl with jamming

[@diamanteduul8084]

s2 underground has a video on it. Though his video is more about how it practically works rather than the technicalities or science behind it.

[@apolloaero]

It's simple really, GPS uses cery weak signals. So russia is using bareage jamming to mask these signals

[@sababugs1125]

Jamming , but it isn't as effective as said in the media, most of the jamming stations are taken out by m30a1 which uses ins

[@M4DHUSKY]

I bet that US bomb cost 20x times more than Z's

[@monerochan69]

Salaries in US are also 20x XD

[@gloria-ke9od]

не можешь

[@CJIABuK77]

​@@monerochan69 nope, 5x

[@Олег-ь5ж7п]

Так и цены в США в 20 раз больше чем в РФ😂​@@monerochan69

[@hibahprice6887]

​@@Олег-ь5ж7п for what exactly? food is even cheaper

[@Dicksonia_squarrosa]

"To avoid criticism say nothing, do nothing, be nothing" - AiTelly In your animation, the wings of the UMPK guidance kit are in an incorrect orientation when deployed. The rounded part of the airfoil should be at the front, and the sharp edge should be at the back of the wing.

[@Aitelly]

You are right 100%

[@dmitrys.4741]

LOL not only the wing profile is backwards. At 08:45 the fins turned left so the bomb should turn to the left. But they drew it turning to the right. These animators have very limited understanding of the physical world )

[@oneaboveall1895]

i hate how the comments first point out your flaws in the video and cant be grateful for you quality content

[@Aitelly]

Thanks for understanding Critics will always be there some good and bad. but this is one of the few comments that give us hope

[@towch]

Not when the flaw is very easy to have noted, clearly showing a urge bias. If you can't be honest about something as simple as the price, what can you be honest about?

[@АлексейГребенкин-я6ф]

Hello. Many thanks for your great job. Animation is truly awesome. We do hope not to meet these horrific weapon ever.

[@andreisokolenko7719]

Quality content means no flaws in the video.

[@America_1st_the.rest.r_last]

​@@Aitelly it's impossible to make everyone happy. There will always be a group of lowlife useless oxygen wasting humans who contribute nothing while complaining at the same time

[@ayushkumar-bg1xf]

Cost of Russian weapons are less so it make more effective for long war

[@therealunclevanya]

The major difference is one costs the small change you find down the back of the couch, the other costs the GDP of a small country

[@JohnJones-k9d]

Plus the expensive one does not work.

[@WarlordEnthusiast]

@@JohnJones-k9d The JDAM has been in use for decades, it has a proven track record and is regarded as one of the most accurate bombs of its type.

[@WarlordEnthusiast]

$24k vs $36k? Tell me again which country has a GDP of $36k?

[@therealunclevanya]

@@WarlordEnthusiast i bet you are fun at parties

[@WarlordEnthusiast]

@@therealunclevanya I sure am :) Not sure how that's relevant however if all I'm doing is pointing out someone spreading misinformation.

[@curiousmindshubofficial]

Really insightful comparison! It's fascinating to see the differences in technology and strategy between the Russian glide bombs and American JDAMs. Your clear explanation helps demystify these complex weapons systems. Great work on presenting this information in an accessible way!

[@Aitelly]

thanks !

[@regenwurm5584]

The FAB 500 knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the FAB 500 from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the FAB 500 is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the FAB 500 must also know where it was.

[@Aitelly]

😌

[@RusNovgorod]

@regenwurm5584 это тот момент, когда думал что слышу мэра Киева Кличко или Камалу Харрис)) "сегодня в завтрашний день, не все могут смотреть. Вернее смотреть могут не только лишь все, не каждый может это делать"

[@thfrussia6717]

FAB means Fugasnaya Avia Bomba as i know. Fugas is something using simple explosives, along with cluster and other types.

[@andrewizub]

I would like to see about the types of Russian bombs, because unlike the jdam, you can attach different types of bombs to the umpk and I saw a video where it was shown that they began to attach an engine to the umpk

[@Vsor]

You can attack different bombs to a JDAM too, there are 15 different variants, ranging from 500lbs to 2000lbs.

[@veldrensavoth7119]

This is so much better then Ryan Macbeth’s video talking about somebody else talking about the glide bomb.

[@Aitelly]

😉 thanks 👍🏻

[@justarandomguy5993]

I haven’t watched that video but Ryan Mcbeth usually does a very good job explaining and talking about things

[@veldrensavoth7119]

@@justarandomguy5993 he literally posted a youtube short about with a title that clearly implied that he going to explain what guide bombs where, then in that told me to click a link to go read/watch this video made by someone else explaining what they where. Twitch streamers do that to children.

[@ColinMor-fj3qc]

@@veldrensavoth7119 REEEEEEEEE

[@thesehobbiesofmine7280]

Yeah. Ryan talks too much. Just another "meeting that could have been an email" kind of video.

[@Vulcain-we5tw]

JDAM's are getting jammed in UKR

[@Aitelly]

Yes I saw a video

[@WinterXR7]

Ukraine has JDAM's? (I have searched it up and Ukraine infact has JDAMs however unlike FABs I have never seen them used)

[@Just_A_Random_Desk]

@@WinterXR7 ye they've been dropping jdams for a few months now

[@efraj5106]

@@WinterXR7 NATO is hurt themselve giving weapons to Ukraine, then captured by Russia and they make copies and search how to make them inoperative... then say Russia is losing

[@DaveP-uv1ml]

JDAMs are not exactly some ultra sophisticated technology. NATO nations have had them much longer than Russia, which seems to have only deployed them relatively recently, but they’ve known about it for a long time. These are supposed to switch to inertial guidance if they detect A disruption or a problem with the GPS signal. This makes them less accurate, but when this happens, the Russian bombs have an advantage since they are larger. The larger explosive means that they are still likely to destroy their target even if they go off a little bit.

[@Elektro-N1k]

there are also UMPB D 30 SN, they are launched from the Smerch MLRS

[@isadanjan4762]

There are more similar to GBU-39 than JDAM

[@ArmaDino22]

Very good channel. No bullshit, no propaganda for either side, no opinion which weapon is better. Just letting the viewer form their own opinion on the subject. It’s like a breath of fresh air.

[@darkopavlic6592]

many falls information. jdam is ineffective because off gps jaming very easy. glonass is much better for that purpose. jdam is much more costly. 10 times more than fab

[@chelazar8895]

I heard that Russian Electronic warfare works very well against jdams

[@giker_min]

it's good against GPS, which is what jdam is running on

[@cuties5864]

​@@giker_minso they are useless

[@GCSloan95]

False, It's effective against Excalibur & GLSDB. GLONASS is extremely jammable as well if the Ukrainians had any decent American EW.

[@Tigr_Rus]

@@GCSloan95 у них их было много, большинство из стали металлоломом!😉

[@Efemernyy_Gospodin]

Люблю наши ФАБы (Фугасная Авиа Бомба). Это пример наследия советских инженеров, которое сегодня, благодаря современным технологиям, получило вторую жизнь. И теперь снова находится на страже нашей Родины

😂

[@viktorv.3027]

полюбил бы ты ее, когда она к тебе во двор прилетит

[@shankewang5802]

Isn't there a FAB-5000?

[@abelmh34]

FAB-5000 isnt optimal for guidance kits, cant glide far

[@andrewizub]

FAB - 9000

[@mrobocop1666]

​@familypowergroup in the Soviet Union nonexistent country, and were used to crush mojaheeden with their entire mountains in another nonexistent country, Democratic Republic of Afghanistan

[@lukebruce5234]

@familypowergroup by looking at the map

[@iangold5566]

500 kg is a total weight of FAB-500. Charge is something about 300 kg. Anything above it's caliber is practically useless, cause blast energy to the range is going down by square or even cube, can't catch now.

[@Aitelly]

Great Feedback

[@Артём-ц5э8з]

This is an incorrect conclusion. Suffice it to recall that the FAB-1500 is only 675 kg of TNT. That is, it has 875 kg. fragments.

[@iangold5566]

@@Артём-ц5э8з Dear, it's ain't no conclusion, it's a mere fact . Russians are using their so-so smart bombs as a bunker busters mostly, so it doesn't matter how much of fragments there. And only 500's are handy for air forces to use and mostover are present in quantity.

[@nishantshrivastava9674]

Ur animation has very precise attention to details.. Like R&D drawing board. How is it made?? Does software do it automatically or u guys have to put every details in software for it to create thousands of sub components assembling and finally making a complete PGM??

[@Aitelly]

We have templates and a library of assets we created over the years. It does help us a bit

[@YurkovYuri]

2:56 The container between the engine nacelles is not a bomb, but an additional fuel tank. It is attached to a suspension point where weapons can be attached.

[@hairi_deathwish9650]

i like content like this hopefully you can make a video about russian kornet atgm or rusian wire guided atgm

[@Aitelly]

noted

[@Motjabrus]

FAB is not High Explosive in Russian, its Fugasnaya Aviacionnaya Bomba means Fougasse Aviation Bomb

[@batman9592]

Fab 500 weighs 500kg AND has 500kg of TNT... riiiiiiiiiiight.

[@Aitelly]

That is what the Russian says on their specs

[@clevernduruza8624]

They only use the tnt weight not the overall weight.

[@Gumirishche]

500 это примерная масса бомбы(500+/-50 кг в зависимости от модификации), ВВ понятное дело меньше. Такая классификация как: ФАБ 100,250,500 удобна для нас, так как мы подвешиваем бомбы на держатели, которые предназаначены для определённых весовых категорий. Таким образом, по названию уже понятно, какой держатель нужен для определённой бомбы.

[@thered98]

Its tnt equivalent. It may be RDX, which is more powerful than tnt, so 300kg of rdx is 500kg of tnt

[@dada-ys3vm]

The bomb weighs 500kg and the filling is 201kgs how hard something explodes is normally written in tnt. Just how nuke has explosive power of 1 megaton of tnt but doesnt weigh 1 megaton

[@iron74tube]

You messed up the cost of the Russian Fab glide bombs. They are waaaay cheaper than $24k. The bombs are refurbished from Soviet stockpiles and the glide kits cost like $3k max (300k Roubles). Russians don't build gold plated weapons like the western versions.

[@Naya-p4x]

Been waiting for a video on fab-500. Thank you, Aitelly!

[@Aitelly]

Always Welcome!

[@AchwaqKhalid]

2:26 Can someone indicate if it can carry (2x1500) or (4x500) in addition to other weaponry or can only carry those configurations without any air to air missiles ❓

[@absiddique139]

If Alien 👽 wanted to destroy mankind they simply have to wait. We are doing their work for them

[@ne7611]

The plan has been going well for thousands of years lol interstellar psyops hhhh

[@efraim6960]

lame

[@viktorv.3027]

увы, Вы правы

[@HesFoset]

00:25 The wing section is reversed. The pointed end of the airfoil should be towards the rear and the curved side should be towards the front.

[@WellWisdom.]

There is no way the Russian kit cost 24k.

[@giker_min]

Мы на всем чем можем сэкономим

[@georgevonfloydmann1797]

we inherited insane amount of bombs and other stuff from USSR + we are producing more stuff at the moment, so it should not be suprise that the equipment costs so little

[@кириллЧе-ш8ц]

Бомба-подарок от СССР,модуль коррекции и планирования стоит примерно 3-5 тыс долларов

[@luiscigar4683]

UMPK Glid boom Fab 500, 1000 , 1500, FAB 3000, FAB 5000 & FAB 9000

[@pacus123]

I am fairly sure the US JDAM is an order of magnitude dearer than its Russian counterpart

[@Andrey72NL]

Russian weapons are always non-profitable in production. All manufacturers belong to the state. That is why they can produce all in such quantity. Though FAB-3000 might be quite expensive.

[@srijanme]

yeah US JDAM is pretty good at getting jammed lmaoo

[@SteveMcQueenPhofighter]

Informed Americans 🇺🇸 Love Russia... ❤Россия 🇷🇺

[@Egor-Scharay]

FAB-1500 isn't the biggest bomb in our arsenal, the biggest is FAB-9000

[@viktorv.3027]

просто ужас

[@rainlord137]

Your 3D model of the airfoil for the FAB-500 are inverted.

[@aymanami]

Can you make a video about the Type 90 please.

[@Aitelly]

We already made a Video

[@aymanami]

@@Aitelly I think you made about the T90M not the type 90 (its an japanese MBT)

[@mauser98kar]

Honestly, UMPK looks more promising. Unlike JDAM-ER, it requires less work on the bomb and is truly unviversal. If JDAM is Mk80-series only, UMPK exists in 3 calibers (250kg, 500kg, 1500kg; with potential 3000kg coming up) and can be installed on any bomb in said calibers. You want thermobaric, cluster, HE, HE-frag, low-drag, high-drag? UMPK can be fitted on practically any bomb. Technically, you should not even have any restrictions on the bomb type: cluster, HE/HE-F and thermobarics are just the only one being used as of now. Potentially, incendiary, bunker-buster, anti-airfield or even nucler bombs can use the same kit. If its high-drag stubnose variant, there are optional metallic hoods to reduce the drag. Its simply many times more versatile than JDAM. If if its accuracy is sometimes somewhat lacking, if improving over time.

[@vladivanov9082]

Это лучший коментарий!!! Сотни тысяч простых недорогих бомб получили новые характеристики и применение!!!

[@Pantsir-S1M]

T-14 Armata when?

[@Pantsir-S1M]

@@goranrasljic6555 Did I ask for all of that?

[@Pantsir-S1M]

@@goranrasljic6555 It's your KZbin Channel

[@spinningsquare1325]

It could have already been made

[@Maxhartmann2024]

@@Pantsir-S1M pretty rude… Who cares what did you ask? Here people can comment anything they want

[@Pantsir-S1M]

@@Maxhartmann2024 You are rude when I asked for T-14 Armata video

[@YurkovYuri]

A small correction. FAB (ФАБ) - High Explosive Aviation Bomb (Фугасная Авиационная Бомба). It's not just High Explosive. 1:11

[@mynameisnobody211]

The American bombs have a 5% accuracy because the Russians can block the gps, which is an interesting fact that you left out of the equation.

[@Godgamer14905]

How Russian stil M1 ship launch Sam launcher works and how it's mechanism works?

[@kuidezso8465]

❤❤Super Congratulation ❤🎉RUSSSIA FEDERATION ❤🎉

[@Maks_K074]

You've raised the price almost three times. The cost announced by the manufacturers of one set of UMPC (universal descent planning and correction module), with a FAB-500M-62 charge, is about 800,000 rubles, which is about $ 9,000. Where did the sum of 24,000 come from?

[@mitkasan8915]

You forget FAB-3000💪

[@Cryptic_Chai]

R&D team must be spying in the govts😂. Jokes apart, you guys are hilarious. Much appreciated ❤

[@Itoyokofan]

Also it's worth mentioning that Su34 and UMPK FABs are a system. Su24s cannot effectively use this weapon because they can climb only up to 10 km with it, which (since it's a gravity weapon) significantly reduces the range and thus makes it unsafe for pilots. While Su34 drops these from 20 km height. Much like Mig31 and Kinzhal, other planes cannot so effectively speed the missle up to supersonic speed before launching it. Which gives the Iskander's missile a little more oomph, like 1-1,5 km/s on top, and more range.

[@hanbyeongyeob]

미국, 유럽연합, 일본 등 모든 나라의 전투기는 미사일과 포탄 투하할때 아음속 비행을 합니다. 초음속 비행 중 미사일과 포탄 투하할 경우 해당 항공기 몸체나 날개를 타격하기 때문에 세계 모든 전투기 폭격기의 공통 사항입니다

[@愛を込めてロシアから]

You explained so simply that you have an American education

[@kristianspot2683]

No matter whay you say, Russian army is advancing and testing stuff in real battlefields, they ARE capable.

[@Саша-н3с6н]

Я не понимаю ни единого слова о чём говорит этот американец, но мне нравится как русские ФАБы бомбят украинцев 🎉🎉🎉

[@СаняБезфамильный-о6ш]

@@Саша-н3с6н а мне нравится, читать комментарии иностранцев, 90% обсерают пропаганду своих стран))

[@gotrefer6183]

and after that someone still think that russians is not nazies. yu one of them

[@IvanIvanov-gp3vg]

Всё ваше дорогостоящее оружие бесполезно на поле боя. Не лезьте к нам. Предупреждение из России.

[@vladod.6220]

Так это вы лезите в Украину.

[@solracohcnap]

The Russian government makes its own weapons. In the US, private companies manufacture weapons, at a very high price, each screw on a missile costs as if it were gold, they are very good weapons, with great technology but with a stratospheric cost.

[@jaydee2072]

LOLLLLL are you really this dumb? You really think that those Russian "defense" companies aren't just another lynchpin in the oligarch scheme that is Russia? How much the troll farm pay you to play yourself in public like that?

[@moderatelinuxoid945]

Ursula von der Leyen said that the Russians use chips from washing machines in their weapons and will soon run out of washing machines. Where does she buy such a high-quality drug?

[@glike2]

0:26 does the Russian FAB500 really have the airfoil backwards?

[@Sufferingzify]

I think you overpriced the UMPK by twice it's cost.

[@ruldali615]

Но если учесть что это делают государственные предприятия с массовым производством, то возможно и еще меньше. Вообще американское ценообразование меня очень удивляет. Но с учетом того что американское военное производство полностью коррумпировано и принадлежит частным лицам то такие огромные цены на военное оборудование не должно никого удивлять. Это капитализм в самой его дикой форме. Коррупция в США настолько беспрецедентна в силу правовой легализации с использованием механизма лоббизма и подкупа, что запредельные ценники уже никого не должны удивлять.

[@indigenoustrader]

You got the wings of the fab bomb facing the wrong side if at all you look at the wing cross-section.

[@kyekye2K]

What this video failed to show is their impact on the ground. The JDAM is hardly mentioned in Ukraine because it has proved very ineffective. Electronic warfare by the Russian military cause the JDAM and the HIMARS to be directed off course to land harmlessly while the Russian glide bombs has proved very devastating on the battle field. It levels huge fortifications into rubble in a matter of seconds.

[@Felipe-km8ut]

Russian adaptability and boldness can destroy NATO

[@MGZetta]

I don't think aluminum wings with a guidance kit costs more than a whole loitering munition with guidance kit, wings, engine, camera, and the warhead. Especially when Russia doesn't like to waste money on extra stuff like paint jobs and prettier designs, etc.

[@12zaf1]

I strongly doubt that a fab 1500 can structurally damage a building 500m from the impact spot. I even doubt it can do that at 100m distance.

[@Militaryst.]

Я вам советую посмотреть применение ФАБ-1500 видео есть в ютуб. Вы сильно удивитесь.

[@alejandroeduardoacuna4444]

Un excelente video simple y facil de entender. Felicitaciones.

[@bachirbendjelloul2363]

Free Palestine 🇵🇸

[@stephengrinkley9889]

Great video. Apparently in response to Russian EW and GPS spoofing, the US has modified the JDAM to hone in on the source of the spoofing. Can you explain how that works?

[@marcelkroeze7580]

A jammer sends a signal much like a guidance radar would. It clutters the guidance with conficting messages. Instead of being jammed, the guidance system used the source of the jamming as a target point. But that can be evaded easily by putting the jammer on and off while staying mobile.

[@johnmccane1970]

You forgot to mention that JDSM doesn’t work in the Ukrainian frontline 😂😂😂

[@vadvadimych8797]

BDSM + JDAM = JDSM

[@lordisback1947]

The difference between Russia and US is that US has been in war for years and they don't have much of these dumb bombs to enable with these kits rather Russia which has entered a major war after so many years has huge Soviet stock pile of these weapons that's why we are seeing Russia increased use of these weapons by 400% comparatively Ukraine is using less of this now than before

[@killman369547]

It would also be wise to assume that these UMPK kits have inertial navigation too, to make the weapon more resistant to jamming and electronic warfare.

[@oneshotme]

I very much enjoyed your video and I gave it a Thumbs Up

[@ЭнзерБагряный]

УМПК on English translate like: Universal Module of Gliding and Correction (UMGC). That means, UMGC is universal module for bombs from FAB-250 to FAB-3000

[@julhianp.rodrigues9079]

Video suggestion: how MICLIC ( Mine Clearing Line Charge) works

[@altaccaltacc7652]

Ooh, i love the fab design because it seems like it can be fitted on all bombs without much modifications

[@justgivemethetruth]

Which system was developed and rolled out first?

[@mitchellstrobbe7779]

The wing profiles on the fab-500 are backwards: leading and tail edges are switched.

[@justinsnodgrass2818]

That US data leak showed that jdams had a lot of problems from jammers. They still arrived within the areas but sometimes this resulted in a wasted drop as it was not on target.

[@Aitelly]

Yes i read the Russian Jammed the Jdam

[@gaoth88]

Glide bombs with satalite guidance: The bomb knows where it is at all times, it knows by calculating where it is and where it isn't.

[@stasduda4129]

"Я решил освободить германские границы от элементов неуверенности, постоянной угрозы гражданской войны. Я добьюсь, чтобы на восточной границе воцарился мир, такой же, как на остальных наших границах. Для этого я предприму необходимые меры, не противоречащие предложениям, сделанным мною в Рейхстаге для всего мира, то есть, я не буду воевать против женщин и детей. Я приказал, чтобы мои воздушные силы ограничились атаками на военные цели. Если, однако, враг решит, что это даёт ему карт-бланш, чтобы вести войну всеми средствами, то получит сокрушающий зубодробительный ответ." (Речь фюрера 01.09.1939 в Рейхстаге).

[@NJCair]

И?

[@marshalllapenta7656]

Question? How did they come up with 75 kilometers for the glide bomb? -What about wind patterns?Or rain effecting the destination? Regarding the fuse? Has there ever been a time when the fuse never got set off?

[@Aitelly]

Yes many times since it's from the 1960s there's a probability of around 30% unrexploded ammunition when dropped

[@marshalllapenta7656]

@@Aitelly I wondered that..... Have you ever seen either of them in person?

[@georgewashingtom6516]

@@Aitelly You're forgetting the fact that not all FAB bombs are old. many of them are being manufactured today

[@mabus7367]

glide bomb is game changer The difference between advanced bombs and old bombs is the precision. Glider bombs are simple and inexpensive to make old bombs more precise than the latest bombs.