All about HAYABUSA Ⅱ

[@小田裕康-r1o]

東宝映画[ 加藤隼戦闘隊]の一部がつかわれていますね。

[@神田さとる]

前半の白黒フィルムは実写映像かと思いました。でも、当時、カーチスＰ４０との空中戦はこのようなものだったのでしょうね。貴重な映像に感激しました。

[@scottsmith491]

when was this video made? Is this aircraft still flying today??😸

[@typhoonhawker6548]

前半の白黒フィルム。敵役は日本陸軍が鹵獲したアメリカ陸軍航空隊のＰ-40ウォーホークとイギリス空軍のバッファロー。

[@五十嵐仁-k1z]

小惑星に着陸して、サンプルを持ち帰った日本のロケット🚀　ハヤブサと言う❢　設計は糸川先生で、小惑星の名前もイトカワと言う❢

[@ほんつけなしかぢゃくちゃね]

隼 名前に恥じない名機だ

[@塩貝健二]

隼は主翼に燃料タンクを取り付けた為に、20ミリ機関砲か付けられ無い欠陥があった❗と開発者の加藤光男中佐が言っていたそうです？が！加藤光男中佐はこの隼で生涯、263機を撃墜した⁉️と聞きましたが？

[@washonoda4017]

まだ飛ぶ隼が在るのか！

[@washonoda4017]

@ 様 ありがとうございます。m(__)m 皇紀2601 1式陸軍隼戦闘機　海軍と根性が違いますね！

[@jackdaniel7465]

The Ki-43 was a good maneuverable aircraft, but it had NO FIRE POWER, the two 7.7 mm machine guns were no match against the six 12.7mm machine guns of American aircraft, further more the Ki-43 was easily shot down because it was lightly built and could not sustain allot of damage, other than that it was an OK fighter.

[@fifteenbyfive]

On the earliest post-prototype variant which was only a stopgap.

[@jackdaniel7465]

@@fifteenbyfive don't get me wrong, it was still a beautiful aircraft and highly maneuverable,it's just it could not sustain any damage because it was very lightly built with rifle caliber fire power, even the later variants even though upgraded still had those same flaws, and was just pointing that out, not taking anything away from the pilots and their bravery, again it is a very beautiful aircraft.

[@chadbosemen10]

Your mother secretly regrets birthing you