ALL-IN-ONE Lens for Street Photography - Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 Fuji X (Video Tests & Comparisons)

[@Philtho]

That Sigma ate everything alive. At 2.8 it's so incredibly sharp, I was not expecting that.

[@muttishelfer9122]

In the corners it is not sharp.

[@truecuckoo]

Thanks. Very interesting to see the golden Sigma colours vs FujiFilm's slightly colder colours when you were switching between the lenses.

[@sorrybangetbro]

Oh my i just confuse to decide, this give me a chill, thank you so much for this best video

[@pictorest]

Made a Great-Lakes-Trip for 3 weeks with this Sigma on an a6400 & a GRIII. As a tourist I used the setup with the Sigma about 90 % of the time and if you know the focal length of the GR the Sigma is perfect with it's 18mm on the low end. Only downside of the Sigma is the heavy distortion when shooting raw.

[@CameraRay]

My Tamron 17-70mm is noticeably sharper than my Sigma 18-50mm. I only kept the Sigma for gimbal use. Also the 17mm seems much wider than the 18mm even though it's just 1mm. Both are good.

[@ZappaBlues]

I do still photography only. A sharp, compact, constant f2.8 lens seems a good option, especially with the X-S10 with IBIS.

[@frapalagus]

5:30 Wow pastéis de nata in the wild at Hamburg! Good choice of pastry, sir. Cheers from Lisbon, Portugal

[@andrecruz100]

I thought the same.

[@area28]

Thank you very much. I also thougt getting the Tamron, but I like the Sigma better, so far as I saw Videos. I ordered the Sigma now and as I could see in your Video, I will not have stabilization problems with my xhs2.

[@tomaspuskas950]

I think I am going to purchase this :) I actually bought Fujinon 23mm f2 and Sigma 30mm f1.4. My plan was to test them during week, make decision and return one of them back to shop. I cannot be more suprised - I didn't need week, not day, not one hour. After few shoots I can tell you that Sigma for Fujifilm is much more SHARPER, of course it has BETTER BOKEH (I cant compare with fujinon 23 f1.4, but this one has old SLOOOWER AF speed). As bonus - Sigma is cheaper.

[@HogbergPhotography]

Interesting that a few reviewers say that is sharp from corner to corner at 50mm..? Who am I to trust?

[@CCCP85]

One of the best reviews of Sigma lens

[@VincenzoNoletto]

I'm dead after the scene with the gull wings ahahhaahhahaha

[@kosta6980]

Thank you so much, Samuel!

[@creativepicnl]

Love Sigma. It’s that I already own the 18-55 Fuji kit otherwise I would really go for this ❤. Ps. Just splurged on the 85mm 1.4 today for Canon EF so I should stop watching these reviews for a while 😅.

[@Zatanxxx]

Would love this lens for my Nikon Zfc✌

[@samuelljackson.]

Like the color in sigma

[@joannefulgencio615]

what tripod/selfie stick are you using for your gopro?

[@gigamoment]

Thank you for this review! Does this lens have automatic in-camera lens corrections in a Fuji body?

[@SamuelStreetlife]

Yes it does!

[@danielfulop]

has anyone tried it on the X-trans V sensor? Can it resolve 40 MP?

[@alexw335]

How balanced is this on the X-E4?

[@mindecolonia]

Hi Samuel! I just bought my first fuji camera the xt5 and I my bought also my first lense, the Tamron 17-70mm 2.8 But now I am thinking of giving it back to go for the Sigma because it is a little bit smaller. I wanted to aks for your opinion what first lense to buy. I wanted to have one with fast autofocus. Which one would you recommend for the very first lense 🙈?

[@victorrrPV]

I have recently purchased the tamron 17-70 f2.8. I was actually waiting for this lens as an option. Its cheaper. You can look here for sample footages from an xt3 kzbin.info/www/bejne/pIucmnZjpq-fbsU

[@drs-Rigo-Reus]

I experienced Sigma’s rubber getting sticky and gooey after two years. Very nasty in my opinion. I would never buy one again. Just stick with the black metal Fuji supplies.

[@drs-Rigo-Reus]

I looked at an older one in a thrift shop, horrible sticky rubber.

[@maxwellwellmax878]

I came for Samuel, I stayed for the Blah Blah Blah Blah!!

[@Akagami753]

What 😅?

[@wesleychapman9001]

I've watched hours of comparisons of this lens vs others but WOW that comparison to the kit 18-55mm was shocking! I have it and have been enjoying it but damn that resolution difference is huge, and I would love the extra stop of light on the telephoto lens plus that added bit of weather sealing on my new X-s20. Cheers mate!

[@awake780]

Great video! I think this is going to replace my Fuji 16-55. I’ll miss the 16 mm, but I won’t miss the weight.

[@colinhoward2200]

Very good video - is making me think about changing my 18-55 for it. Only downside for me is the loss of focus while zooming - the 18-55 is almost par focal for video. The attraction is the fact it does not have OIS actually as I find if I pan with my 18-55 the OIS fights with IBIS and the footage becomes quite juddery. Do you see that in the Sigma?

[@SicksomniA]

This is the best review by far and the best video for this Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 Lens for Fujifilm X Mount

[@alexisagcopra4207]

Enjoyed your review, mate. When you did the AF test, i noticed. Fujinon jumped back & forth more than the sigma did. I can say i really like the colour rendition of sigma lens (i do have this lens in e mount version for my a6000). Im just hoping for sigma to release a 12mm f/1.4, that will be superb combo for the 18-50

[@chandlerchhem2128]

Still rocking my Made in Japan version of the xf 18-55 with my fujifilm xpro3

[@innstikk]

All Sigma lenses are Made in Japan too

[@TheStreetNomad]

maybe it's placebo but the Sigma is noticeably sharper in the center and at 18 the auto focus hunted significantly less than the fuji in the real world video tests you did. I may consider switching to this lens over my 18-55 seeing as the constant 2.8 is useful for video and the size is a slight bit smaller.... Super video Samuel.

[@simonhuegly]

For Video!? Even if Samuel pointed out the focus breathing or readjusting when zooming during video recording!? I love how smooth I can zoom with the Fuji while taking a video! Did you really switch? What was you experience ? Greetings

[@rockymhs]

This would be a go-to lens for me if I had an APS-C camera. So compact, yet great image quality for useful focal range.

[@blood_n_guts_murphy]

That's what it has become for me (had on Sony for 6 months). I barely use other lenses now. Just a portrait lens or wide pancake occasionally. If I had on Fuji this lens would replace the Fujicrons.

[@zegzbrutal]

Use it on a7r4/a7r5, it's still very capable

[@chesslover8829]

Rockyhms, use your Sony camera in crop mode.

[@RoyAlf]

Thanks for the video. Really helped me choose my first lens for my XT4 after moving from Sony. Wanted the Fuji experience. Wanted the Fuji 16-35 f2.8, but it’s way out of my capability at the moment. Instead I’m getting the Sigma 16, and a bit later the Sigma 18-50. I shoot video mainly (podcast), and maybe try some photography with the Fuji, Sony ergonomics are so uncomfortable.

[@giandeguzman6402]

Wow. Were the videos handheld? Pretty steady even without OIS yes?

[@iamcaferacer]

I just picked up a X-T30ii with this lense

[@AKhairaddin]

I'm thinking about getting this lens for my X-T30II as well, Does the lack of OIS bother you for photography?

[@andyminch9156]

You missed the greatest disadvantage the fuji lens has to the sigma - the fuji has variable aputure, goes from 2.8 to 4.

[@massimob4054]

pretty much every reviewer of this lens compares it to the 18-55 kitlens. I do see the point, however i think that the most direct competitor is the 16-55 2.8. In this case, if the quality is on par (and it seems so from what you said at the end of the video) considering that the fuji lens is a brick , it is a no brainer. this sigma is the zoom lens to buy if you do not already have the 16-55.

[@Omgiamsotriggered]

How would u compare this 18-50 against the XF 18-55 kit lens? I currently have the option to either buy the kit cam or the body + sigma 18-50 for the same money? Which one would u recommend

[@leonthesleepy]

wow didnt expect it to be that much sharper than the kit 18-55mm

My dream lens would be something like 10-400 f/1.8 pancake but this one is close

[@Kevodabomb_Media]

LOL we could only wish :D

[@giulianof8687]

Please Sigma, make a 15-45 f2 zoom. It will destroy all the zooms

[@Ignotus.]

I'm a beginner hobby photographer at the stage where i want to upgrade from my kit lens. I have the Fuji XC 15-45mm f3.5-5.6 lens, and have been considering selling it and getting this Sigma 18-50mm f2.8, or keeping my current one and getting the Sigma 56mm f1.4. Do you (or anyone else) have any recommendations?

[@dimakor5914]

I almost regret I bought full frame. One kilo full frame 24-70/2.8 for 2200$ and this Sigma lens.

[@IanInChengdu]

I still think the 18-55mm is still the best kit lens ever made. I would buy the Sigma if I didn’t have the Fuji lens for that extra brightness.

[@Jennifer-wr9si]

I so wanted to like that lens. I tried 2 different samples, and I just wasn't 'getting' the love for that lens (and I"m not even a pixel peeper!).

[@bigheadtaco]

When I got this lens I immediately thought about you buddy.

[@SilatShooter]

Curious what you thought comparing the Sigma to the Ricoh GR III? Hard to tell the sharpness difference from the video, but it looks like it has far less vignetting than the GR III.

[@SamuelStreetlife]

I am not sure if the Sigma Lens had a correction profile turned on in camera. That could be the reason why it doesn't vignette much. But overall I think the Sigma is really good at 18mm and only suffers a bit in the corners. The GR III was also not perfect in the corners wide open but corners get sharp quickly after F4 and higher. The Sigma never really was super sharp in the corner even stopped down. If you only shoot 18mm (28mm FF) than I would look for a prime lens. Or shoot wide open with the Sigma if your subject is mostly in the center. But overall the Sigma is solid.

[@SilatShooter]

@@SamuelStreetlife Appreciate the candided detailed response. Still a GRIII and GRII shooter but have a Sony A6600 as well.

[@IchBinDerJesko]

I maen I still have the kit 18-55 f2.8-4 and it even has some advantages over the sigma so im keeping it over the sigma

[@malthus101]

5:14 - why am I not surprised.... 😑

[@SMGJohn]

Sigma lenses since 2012 have been pretty boring, like, really boring, I do not say that as a negative way, you can take it how you like, by boring I mean they produce a very clean and perfect image, their body is all black with a very industrial design which I like, but the pictures they provide you, its, just that, it just looks so good, in fact Sigma are excellent lenses for professional work because of their clean image quality, but not so much if you like having fun unless there some glimmerglass you can add of course. Each to their own I guess, its a beautiful lens, that and the Tamron 17-70mm for APS-C are brilliant glass.

[@ThePhotographyHobbyist]

4:10 The Fuji 16-80mm does that also, unfortunately. It goes wildly out of focus when you zoom and then refocuses. Can't really use it for any 'serious' or cinematic video IF you need to zoom while recording.

[@hellni79]

there's no X-mount lens built parfocal except the cinema line unfortunately

[@kostyafedot551]

Crop sensor kit lenses were/are 18-55 3.5-5.6. Constant f2.8 was/is always update. Not just because of 2.8... But these days, if I want street zoom lens it has to be weather sealed :)

[@DigiDriftZone]

I find the advantage of a fast lens on the wide end is a lot more pronounced than at the tele end. 18mm at f4 looks significantly worse but at 50mm, it becomes more marginal. It’s a close call. Loss of focus while zooming and lack of OIS though… hmmmm

[@phitur]

The latest gadget always more attracting

[@michap9638]

@@phitur o czym wy mówicie, 18-50 bliżej z pięknym rozmyciem do 56 niż do paskudnego bokeh 18-55, 18-55 nie sprzedałem bo był za mało ostry, nie sprzedałem bo nie trafiał, chociaż nie trafiał jak cholera, sprzedałem bo jego rozmycie jest okropne

[@steffen_r]

Thanks for the review. I got a 16-80 F4 as my travel lens some time ago for nearly the same price as the Sigma. Unfortunately i did not know about the 18-50, cause it seems to be pretty good and a good with its F2.8 and would fit the XE-4 even better.. What do you think - how do those lenses compare? (besides F2.8 and the missing mm's ;) )

[@tulasnaps]

We are in the same boat haha. I have the 16-80 and the 10-24 f4s.. honestly this sigma lens would be great for the 2.8 and lower light situations and also I love how it’s even more compact. But overall I’m satisfied. At this moment (because I’m not rich) I can’t justify purchasing it. But if I had money to blow I would get it and this would be my street photo lens for sure.

[@steffen_r]

@@tulasnaps For street i still have the 27mm R WR and my TTArtisan 35 1,4 (which is manual - but for 45,00 EUR used a great little lense). In case i want it "longer" i could switch to the Viltrox 56 1,4. Right now i'm in love with the 35 1.4, cause the whole manual world is kind of slowing me down in a positive way ;)

[@tulasnaps]

@@steffen_r I had a lot of these lenses and the whole Viltrox collection...and I'm missing them. I regret not bringing them to Mexico, because here it's difficult to get these things and dealing with importing is a pain. i want the 18 f2 and a 27mm as my daily shooters. I would sell the 16-80 honestly and just keep the 10-24. I seem to be more drawn to wider photos and the 27mm is about as tight as I would want to go. I wish I would've got the Ricoh for my 28mm equivalent obsession. Would have worked great here in Mexico.

[@Vartan297]

Great video. 👍🏻🤙🏻🤙🏻

[@blood_n_guts_murphy]

Really good video about a great lens. It has quickly become my favorite lens for it's versatility and size. I use for travel and street, where it includes all the focal lengths I like (18mm, 23mm, 35mm, 50mm i.e. great alternative to the f2 Fujicrons). Big boost over the kit lens by having f2.8 at 50mm, which makes it a decent portrait option too (my beloved Sigma 56 f1.4 has been gathering dust). I am using this zoom 80-90% of the time, then occasionally a wide pancake or the 56.

[@sebastianh.8405]

I have an XE4 and really like the Sigma but im not sure if it's the best option without the IS. Maybe the Fuji Kit lens is better in this case? What do you think ? I only do photography and not Video... Thanks!

[@SamuelStreetlife]

I think the Fujinon Kit lens would be more useful on the X-E4 than the Sigma. The X-E4 already has so few buttons so having the aperture dial on the Fujinon lens is a big help. And the IS will be helpful when your shoot 18mm 2.8 in dark environments. Unless you need 2.8 with 50mm a lot I would use the Kit lens with the X-E4.

[@indago1]

"Eat this fu***rs" made me laugh so hard :))))

[@johnmakphotography]

It is an amazing lens! Thanks for sharing Samuel!

[@BarbaSouEu]

it's definitely not affordable

[@dpa03]

Compared to others in this focal range at 2.8? It’s extremely affordable

[@microjigging]

I was just bingeing all your videos and now im very early

[@SamuelStreetlife]

Haha niiice :D

[@Princeton_James]

Got mine today. Putting my 18-55 up for sale. That was always a reliable lens but variable aperture is junk.

[@ionrage]

Really hope Sigma considers a wider lens thats bright, I use the 16mm sigma on my fuji as well but there isnt a time that goes by and i think, would it not be better to just get the sony ZV E10 and get the 11mm sony lens which outright price to price and type of lens has no competition from any lens manufacturer.

[@simonhuegly]

Hi Samuel! I own an XT4 and almost exclusively lenses with aperture ring. But I will help a friend to get started with her new Xs10 soon (without having had one in my hands yet), and wonder how exactly do YOU change aperture of the Sigma 18-50. I am leaning towards recommending her that lens as a starter - her body will come without any lens! I already checked the XS10 manual online but apparently and very unfortunately you can't program the left Fn Function Dial for that, right? Wouldn't that have been great?? And where do you have SS and Exposure Compensation. ISO stays on the ISO button? THANKS FOR YOUR HELP! I suspect the best way for my friend as a beginner, would be to program her 3 practical Auto ISO adjustments and then activate APERTURE on either the FRONT or the REAR COMMEND DIAL? I heard those aren't even clickable but you can put APERTURE on one of them? ->>> Oh, just found it: you have to put the camera in Mode A (APERTURE PRIORITY AE) or M(MANUAL) so that the front command dial operates APERTURE. GREAT VIDEO btw!

[@Holzi4000]

I would love to see a comparison to the new released xf 16-50mm from fuji and if it is worth the upgrade.

[@rafsnchz]

Cool review! I really like this lens, I usually use prime lenses but I need a zoom for concert photography (changing lenses during concert is not a good idea I think especially in small clubs/bars) and some video work too, since I find f1.4 to be too shallow for practical use. The problem with Tamron is that while it has more reach and OIS, in practice 50mm vs 70mm is not a huge difference and I saw a numerous videos reporting that OIS on Tamron is seriously buggy when using is on cameras with IBIS, both Fuji and Sony cameras have these issues. So for me this Sigma lens seems like a no brainer.

[@jeremiebotte1259]

Hi Samuel, thanks for your content on this lens. Can you answer the question: have you, by the chance, forgotten to turn off the OIS on the XF 18-55 f2.8-4 during the brick wall test? Not that I am a pixel piper but when I review your results on my EIZO 27' 1440, there's a clear win from the Sigma over the Fuji. In fact, the IQ at pretty much every focal lenght looks mushy. If OIS/IBIS was turned off, then Sigma is the clear winner here. Thanks if you reply. Have a great day.

[@SamuelStreetlife]

Hey Jeremie, yes I did turn off IS on the Fujinon 18-55mm. But I also find it strange how soft it was mid range. Maybe my lens is not in perfect shape anymore. But other reviews also show that the Sigma is a little better overall.

[@SivertAlmvik]

Idea for next review: "What is the best lens for photographing brick walls! (GONE SEXUAL) (NOT CLICKBAIT)" :)

[@EkaterinaZolotova]

Thank you for your video! What do you think about Fuji 35mm 1.4?

[@JayGrapherTh]

very nice comparison between the fuji lens and sigma lens. thanks for reminding me about the other alternative prime lens - 16mm f1.4 seems nice when fuji version is the older step motor thats a little slower than their modern ones right? though for vlogging, do you hold the camera out to film yourself at 18mm? I feel like you film yourself with the 360 camera then shoot b-roll or other people using the fuji camera.

[@SamuelStreetlife]

I did hold out the Sigma 18-50mm at 18mm out for vlogging. Jut holding the camera with my hand. I would use a small tripod if I would use the 18mm for vlogging. It is a little bit close. 16mm works much better. But yeah you can use a GoPro or 360 camera for vlogging and use the 18-50mm for B-Roll :)

[@JayGrapherTh]

@@SamuelStreetlife thank you :)

[@giuseppedangelogt]

great video! I’m tempted to buy this lens for my x t30 II. I have only one doubt: how I change the F in camera? Is it so uncomfortable not to have a diaphragm ring for street? Thank you again!

[@westdk6705]

Right now Sam is enjoying Germany vs Japan ⚽⚽ including Krombacher . Jaaaaa 😁🍭

[@TechWithBruno]

Just ordered this lens, can't wait! 😁also, 5:31 , pasteis de nata, nhamiii😅

[@danielcarlstedt9216]

Can this be a replacement of the 16-55mm f2.8 ? Or is that one way better ? I have that one but this one with the size/weight it looks great. No movie, only photography

[@hellni79]

I had the beautiful 16-55 for about a year. great IQ but too heavy... paid for a bit less than 700 and sold for the same price, another good thing about quality lenses. Now I'm looking for an alternative after a short disappointing try with the 16--80 f4. i share my thinking:I'm looking both at the 18-55 kit and the sigma. I really don't like the f4 at 55, but it gives aperture ring and OIS, if needed (I'm on x-t4 so not needed). A used 18-55 is basically half the price of the sigma new, and it will take a while since an used one will be on second hand market. 250-300€ vs 500€ the sigma, with no weather resistance, no aperture ring and probably a more plasticky built. But god it's fixed 2.8, that make all the ranges interesting to 50mm, i remember I loved the 16-55 at 55 2.8, while the 16-80 sucked at f4 50mm upwards. The Fuji 16-55 2.8 has better solid built, weather resistance, aperture ring, it's also good looking aha. But it's goddam heavy to carry around for photography, but the higher price is absolutely justified over the sigma. In my case I'm probably going to wait for a second hand sigma, and hope to find a way to try one asap.

[@hellni79]

p.s. I'm as my only lens at the moment is the 35 1.4 I'm also thinking to the get a 16 1.4 fuji(500-600 second hand) or the 16 1.4 sigma(300-350 i guess second hand) and fuji 23 f2 (300 s.h.), bypassing the convenience of the zoom but gaining in quality.

[@Viewtimebro]

Anyone who has used this lens to zoom video while recording, have you gotten the exposure flickering that happens on other Fujifilm lens? Or is this lens built differently? I’d like to do snappy handheld zooms while recording and have yet to find a good solution?

[@mredben]

7:45 min das Tamron ist klar besser. Bessere Farben, schärfer, viel mehr Möglichkeiten. Sigma hat viele Schwächen im Schärfebereich.

[@odusilesodiq7449]

First time seeing your video and I’m glad I did. I’ve been contemplating buying the xh1 with the sigma 30 1.4 but I haven’t seen sample videos shot in F-log that convince me. Asides the ultra wide shots and the one shot on the xs10 did you shoot the rest on the XH1?

[@simon359]

F2.8 isn’t a fast enough lens and doesn’t give the bokeh that I need for street photography. Once you go primes, you never go back!

[@larchofilms]

Masterpiece review

[@davemenard5089]

I love this man’s lens love him/it!

[@DinovanderMerwe]

Random question I know but I love your Nike SB cap, where did you purchase it?

[@TMM6900]

I like how you compare to things that do not make much sense, e.g. Gr iii. Different view point

[@sanwalmuzammal]

Is this sharper than sigma 16 f1.4 or equaly good?

[@AlexOnStreets]

If I go back to Fuji I would get this lens for sure.

[@Hangiinjohnny]

I’ve been thinking about getting a Fuji for day to day shooting and this lens looks like it could be a small, versatile option

[@alexfns2427]

Personally, on the video segment, I thought the Sigma had much nicer looking skin tones than the Fuji lens. I don't know you personally so I'm not sure how accurate the skin tones are, but the Sigma lens was noticeably nicer imo

[@chiu2003MOBILE]

Tamron is sharper lens

[@hakeemabdella2304]

And 21mm of extra reach, but also almost twice as heavy and pretty big. It was a hard choice for me to make tbh

[@weiyang6417]

I might be interested in this lense, assuming the X-Pro4 will have IBIS.

[@chawangorn35]

What’s the lens at 6:47 min in this VDO? FISHEYE

[@danielcarlstedt9216]

So the X-S10 compared to my X-H1 in terms of dynamic range, any difference? Is the Autofocus much improved for sports compared to X-H1 ?

[@SamuelStreetlife]

Hey sorry for the late reply! But yes the autofocus is much improved on the X-S10 (and now the X-S20) compared to the X-H1. The X-H1 has very fast single AF but not great continuos AF.

[@Jennifer-wr9si]

how is the manual focus on the Sigma? I hate MF on fuji lenses. [ Kit lens in the uk, even used, is more like 300...]

[@SamuelStreetlife]

It is still focus by wire so it's going to behave exactly like fujifilm lenses. If you want a good manual focus experience I recommend looking at the Voigtländer offerings for Fujifilm.

[@OligardaPaz]

How did you get rid of the fujifilm logo on your camera?

[@ThomazMartinez]

What music is that from beginning?

[@LoFiAxolotl]

Love that Tamron and Sigma are making X-Mount lenses now.... but why do they hate aperture rings so much?!? If i want to change shit in menus or with buttons on the camera i might as well go sony or canon

[@josephromano6168]

You could always use the front dial. Coming from Canon it's muscle memory for me.

[@mrdiger170871]

krasser Sonnenstern bei f/11 ggü. dem Fujinon. VG marcus

[@samueljames9015]

Hi Samuel, when you reviewed the Sigma 16-28mm f2.8 briefly I thought the images looked great and similar - sharp, nice contrast good colour but you didn't seem to like it much at the time. Do you think differently now? Thanks for your great review as always, Sam

[@SamuelStreetlife]

Hey Samuel 😀The 16-28mm 2.8 is a great lens! It was just not a lens that was interesting to me because I don't own a full frame L mount camera and I prefer a mid range zoom to a wide angle zoom. The lens was a good performer so I still recommended it in my video. Now with the 18-50mm 2.8 I have a lens that I can actually use and I was looking forward to the release since a while ago.

[@PurpleCow62]

Great video! I think you’ve sold me

[@TungstenOvergaard]

I didn’t expect Ricoh GR was so bad. Soft and vignetting.

[@tperi9116]

Hi man, what do you use when making a video (post vid production or some gimble ) ? The lens has no OIS and still your video is not shaky :) thanks

[@jeffszurgot]

Hi has image stabilization in camera body

[@Peterparker-v9f]

How to zoom wth this camera?

[@stephanweiskorn6760]

Great value for money 😊