All The Possible January 6th Crimes

⚖️ Do you need a great lawyer? I can help! legaleagle.link/eagleteam ⚖️
There are a lot of potential crimes. 🍋 Use code LEGALEAGLE16 for up to 16 FREE MEALS + 3 Surprise Gifts across 7 HelloFresh boxes plus free shipping at legaleagle.link/hellofresh
Welcome back to LegalEagle. The most avian legal analysis on the internets.
🚀 Watch my next video early & ad-free on Nebula! legaleagle.link/watchnebula
👔 Suits by Indochino! legaleagle.link/indochino
GOT A VIDEO IDEA? TELL ME!
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Send me an email: [e-mail]
MY COURSES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Interested in LAW SCHOOL? Get my guide to law school! legaleagle.link/lawguide
Need help with COPYRIGHT? I built a course just for you! legaleagle.link/copyrightcourse
SOCIAL MEDIA & DISCUSSIONS
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Twitter: legaleagle.link/twitter
Facebook: legaleagle.link/facebook
Tik Tok: legaleagle.link/tiktok
Instagram: legaleagle.link/instagram
Reddit: legaleagle.link/reddit
Podcast: legaleagle.link/podcast
OnlyFans legaleagle.link/onlyfans
Patreon legaleagle.link/patreon
BUSINESS INQUIRIES
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Please email my agent & manager at [e-mail]
LEGAL-ISH DISCLAIMER
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
Sorry, occupational hazard: This is not legal advice, nor can I give you legal advice. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. Sorry! Everything here is for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. Nothing here should be construed to form an attorney-client relationship. Also, some of the links in this post may be affiliate links, meaning, at no cost to you, I will earn a small commission if you click through and make a purchase. But if you click, it really helps me make more of these videos! All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).
Special thanks:
Stock video and imagery provided by Getty Images and AP Archives
Music provided by Epidemic Sound
Short links by pixelme.me (pxle.me/eagle)
Maps provided by MapTiler/Geolayers

[@LegalEagle]

⚖️ Who do you think is going to be indicted? 🍋 Get 16 free meals with Hello Fresh using code LEGALEAGLE16 legaleagle.link/hellofresh

[@hollow314]

Please talk about the Artesian Build problem

[@osmosisjones4912]

What evidence

[@osmosisjones4912]

The committee has hear says and conjecture those kinds of evidence

[@stuffhappensdownsouth9899]

somethin about a couple thousand donkeys or mules or something I dunno

[@BigMamaDaveX]

Who'll be indicted? Probably none. 😏 Who SHOULD be indicted? Probably ALL of them. 😉

[@hadorstapa]

That clip of protesters attacking police while carrying a flag saying 'Police Lives Matter' will never get old.

[@auliamate]

police lives matter 1 police offer was killed from strokes in the hospital; 2 committed suicide after oh the irony

[@ladywaffle2210]

It's really nice to be able to point to it, because it's very eloquent proof that the flag just means anti-Black.

[@Papershields001]

That and the fact that a woman wrapped in a “don’t tread on me” flag. Got trampled to death by her fellow trump supporters that day… I’m not happy about it, but it’s pretty damn ironic

[@HotDogTimeMachine385]

A mob with a "Police Lives Matter" flag attacking cops which leads to some of them dying just reminds me of those "Pro-life" people who want women executed if they have an abortion. Or when they say "think of the children" and then say they don't care about improving child education and adoption homes.

[@Xboxzilla]

@@Papershields001 The tramplers should be gunned down like the animals they insisted on acting like.

[@ryantyler9677]

"We want a free election! We want Donald Trump in office" Well, it's not really a free election if only Trump is allowed to be elected.

[@loturzelrestaurant]

Eagle missed some stuff that Some More News covered in 'Greens War on Things She said'.

[@brandonmoore8206]

If we lose, they cheated. If we win, it's fair (but they probably still tried to cheat)

[@spongeintheshoe]

Their definition of "a free election" means that _they personally_ are free to have the president _they personally_ want.

[@Rugelacharugula]

It’s actually not even an *election* if you plan to install the same person regardless of the vote. Kinda the point.

[@Obironnkenobi]

The sad part about this, is all those people involved in this at some point said something along the lines of "You lost, get over it." in 2016. This whole mess is childish on their part and really am holding out that people see the inside of a cell (though I doubt that will happen.)

[@pancakes8670]

Republicans in 2016: "LOL Libtards mad they lost the election. Get over it" Republicans in 2020-2022: "DONALD TRUMP WON NOT BIDEN THE ELECTION WAS OBVIOUSLY RIGGED WE NEED TO OVERTHROW THE CAPITOL"

[@wwshd5393]

Well, it will now

[@fuhque9132]

I honestly think that's *one* of the reasons they've turned fascistic and incredibly conspiratorial _(more so than usual..lol)_ over the last few years. They were SUPER cocky and smarmy when Trump won, and they were SO confident that he would win again..but when he lost, rather than feel embarrassment over their arrogance backfiring on them and taking the L like an adult *(which requires a certain level of self-awareness and intellectual honesty that they clearly don't have)* they instead try to warp reality into what they WISH happened. And most of them have committed to that path, and *nothing* will ever convince them otherwise. *Incredibly ironic behavior coming from the crowd that constantly proclaims to care about "Facts over Feelings"..*

[@astrsychev9333]

Its the best part about it, snowflake

[@ObscuriaDragunAed]

@@fuhque9132 First of all, that username is awesome, lol. Second, totally agreed. The cognitive dissonance has hit critical mass and intermixed with copium, the like that have never been seen before and mixed with mass hysteria too... Yet we're the "woke snowflakes". Gods I wish this was a coma nightmare and that all I have to do is wake up and all of a sudden, this whole debacle isn't happening. I know better, but a gal can wish.

[@oliverdowning1543]

I love that Hello Fresh is totally ok with being marketed as a way for criminals under house arrest to eat nicer food. That's kinda amazing.

[@The_Serpent_of_Eden]

I cringed hard at that ad transition. What a dystopia we live in, eh? Sucks.

[@tristanstrain9751]

@@The_Serpent_of_Eden nah it's pretty based.

[@leezy707]

@@The_Serpent_of_Eden stop being a snow flake.

[@poppachoppa8956]

@@leezy707 lol stop worrying about random people's opinions

[@insertsomethingfuni2617]

@@The_Serpent_of_Eden nah its based

[@sounddude47]

"You can't charge people unless they tampered documents" is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard from a judge. If someone releases a stink bomb into Congress, I'm pretty sure that would count as obstruction since members of Congress need to physically convene together to do their elected job.

[@scottmolnar4132]

Then every protester who stopped a supreme court confirmation hearing should be charged or you have a selective prosecution claim

[@clocksurfer]

Trump habitually and unlawfully destroyed public records throughout his term. Nobody has done anything to make him face consequences for it.

[@scottmolnar4132]

@@clocksurfer I think you misspelled CLINTON

[@polyseed12]

@@scottmolnar4132 Sorry, you can't whataboutism treason.

[@scottmolnar4132]

@@polyseed12 what treason? Trump didn't even commit a crime, but I am sure you would happily charge BLM and Antifa for treason/terrorism

[@apjtv2540]

The fact you managed to condense this to less than half an hour deserves a freaking medal!

[@devcrom3]

He's talking really really fast.

[@cerebrumexcrement]

@@devcrom3 even when slowed down, its still a feat. straight to the point. no emotional yapping.

[@annesmith5192]

@@devcrom3 He talks as fast as I do. And people are always telling me to talk slower. Not recognizing that talking fast is a talent.

[@DaRadicalCavy]

@@annesmith5192 there's a difference between not recognising is a talent and knowing its a useless talent in 90% of situations yet many people find fast talking super inaccessible.

[@86lanzo]

No it doesn't..there wasn't much to this and there never was...ppl were obviously politically motivated to make more of it then there is

[@GayleenFroese]

Criminal solicitation is what I accuse Siri of every time she tells me to pull an illegal u-turn.

[@nerdygoth1688]

I need this quote on some sort of merchandise NOW!

[@mp-kq3vc]

In the words of my father, "The rioters that entered the Capitol building literally pissed and shit in the hallways." While not a comment on legal concerns, that did happen, and I think it sums up the entire debacle.

[@sharonpreston8271]

Exactly what I was thinking. Show what kind if character they have.

[@meaty220]

Yet the BLM and Antifa riots were given a pass. Now that's a hoot 🤣

[@measuringband]

@@meaty220 stop deflecting

[@OnlyTwoShoes]

@@measuringband Citing hypocrisy is noteworthy, even if it deflects from the topic at hand.

[@measuringband]

@@OnlyTwoShoes its a made up hipocrisy, who exactly gave anyone a pass? Cops were cracking down on every protest

[@MitchellTF]

"So, you only hire the best people." "Yes." "...But, almost all the people who you hire either betray you, or commit blatent crimes." "I didn't know them." "But you hired them." "No I didn't."

[@tackyoptic]

Was this a legit exchange?

[@o.b.7217]

@@tackyoptic Several put together.

[@deadeyecpt.7765]

I can confirm that this is actually what Italian politicians tell prosecutors after a major scandal comes to light. To bring an example: after the fall of the Morandi bridge, the Minister of Public Transportation said "he didn't remember ever signing a document guaranteeing the bridge was safe for use". He signed a dozen copies of this document, all of which had his name on it and were brought to his attention in different meetings.

[@Thomas52a]

@@deadeyecpt.7765 Why does your comment have a scroll bar?

[@deadeyecpt.7765]

@@Thomas52a I have no clue

[@georgesears934]

All I want to know: What is the probability that anyone in power will suffer any legal consequences for any of these actions? Is it all just theater or will we see justice?

[@joshuaharmon6684]

I'm pretty sure it is 90% theater. But I don't know what the other Ten percent is

[@zaqwsxcde54321]

The US will never charge nor put in prison an American president. They are too full of themselves

[@gamelairtim]

The committee can make recommendations; criminal indictment is up to the DoJ. I am not a lawyer.

[@ryanmcewen415]

Theater only

[@tylerarmstrong9250]

The DOJ won’t prosecute until they have the evidence for it to be 100% in their favor. It may look like they aren’t doing anything, but once they do something it’s already over for who they prosecute.

[@vargasprime094]

I love our system where one judge who has an obvious bias toward the parties involved in 1/6 can just arbitrarily define obstruction and just has to be treated as legitimate, instead of the blatant partisan hedging it is.

[@The_ZeroLine]

It’s a joke. Just like how judges can cite precedent when it suits their agenda, but then set a new one when the existing ones don’t suit their agenda.

[@mmarage1]

​@The_ZeroLine Or be constutional textualists when it suits them, and then suddenly start doing their job and interpret the constitution (when it suits their agenda.)

[@Eudaletism]

So, he knew they had guns and knives, yet told his staff to take away the metal detectors and let them inside? That's directly aiding the insurrection. "They're not here to hurt me" tells you he knew they might hurt someone, just not him. He also showed a total disregard for threats on the Vice President's life.

[@stephen3164]

Trump at trial: Prosecution: “Did you order the code red?” Trump: “Yes. And it was the biggest code red ever. A beautiful, big code red. We all love the code red.”

[@SpectacularDisaster]

you win this comment section 🤣

[@ryans756]

Son, we live in a world with walls. Big, beautiful walls...

[@BioGoji-zm5ph]

@@ryans756 And I got Mexico to pay for those beautiful walls.

[@claytonreeves150]

@@BioGoji-zm5ph Narrator: "He did not."

[@_Jake.From.Statefarm_]

Is it better than Diet Dr Pepper? Well I have a friend who is very smart who says it is. A very smart guy that guy is. But not everyone can have a Diet Dr Pepper so I asked him. What about the people friend. He is a very smart man he is and he said. Not everyone can have a Diet Dr Pepper so they get a Code Red. It was the greatest conversation in America, better than anyone before me I've been told.

[@camwyn256]

They stopped an official Congressional proceeding for 7 hours. How is that not impeding an official proceeding?

[@johnhostetler2167]

You mean that a bunch of people walked into a building they paid for and delayed a group of people that work for them, what exactly did they do wrong?

[@Louzahsol]

@@johnhostetler2167 hey now, you can't just say exactly what happened

[@BrianBaastrup]

@@johnhostetler2167 you don't get out much, do you?

[@lukethelegendary1999]

@@johnhostetler2167 "walked into' you mean broke into and used violence.

[@notgate2351]

@@johnhostetler2167 well i paid for them too and i dont want any riots?

[@cobrasys]

The fact that there are people in this very comment section saying things like "it wasn't an 'attack'" or "they just walked in and wandered a bit" is truly mind-boggling to me. In this video alone there were snippets of footage from the event that _clearly_ show how bent on violence and obstruction the rioters were. How obtuse, willingly blind and/or dishonest can someone be?

[@OGamerGirl92]

The bar just keeps lowering every single time

[@whattheschmidt]

Pretty sure it's half disinformation trolls and half Americans with IQs well below room temperature.

[@hardrada3534]

there are videos of them being invited in As with all things in life there are different circumstances. The people who rioted should be punished Those who walked around after being invited in should be pardoned and they need to stop torturing them in prison with cruel and unusual punishment. Honestly time already spent in jail should count toward any sentencing which in this case would mean the vast majority of them have already served any sentence they would get.

[@cobrasys]

@@hardrada3534 Thank you for making my point for me so thoroughly. 🙄

[@MM-vs2et]

@@hardrada3534 Tbh only a minority of the "stormers" would be guilty. And I think it's insignificant compared to Trump's complacency during the whole thing. Took him more than 12 hours since the Capitol building was breached. That alone is criminal

[@04m6gto]

It's crazy to me that the elected officials who clearly committed crimes that day, are in fact, still elected officials. Our judicial system sucks.

[@bryan__m]

Wait, honest question, which officials? Were they ever tried?

[@kapmando]

Imagine a world where there was a tape of Obama saying “I just need 11,000 votes”. I bet them it’d be serious to the right all of a sudden.

[@Julia-lk8jn]

It certainly was serious to them when under Obama there were around 10 ebola cases in the US. "The president should resign!!!!" What a dreadful bunch of killer clowns.

[@TheKlopka]

Lol the Obama administration legitimately admitted to spying and disrupting the trump campaign in 2016, what you on about?

[@michaelvega3669]

Thanks Obama 🤣

[@MorbidEel]

Give it a few more years and deepfakes can deliver this to you ...

[@thedapperdolphin1590]

Imagine if Obama said most of the drivel that came out of Trump’s mouth.

[@eldermoose7938]

the mere fact that he's recorded as saying these things and we're still acting like he has some deniability is just depressing

[@adamkwiecinski2783]

he's also recorded as saying to the protesters to go home in peace

[@alaskanyeti907]

@@adamkwiecinski2783 yeah, after it hit the fan and he realized he could be in trouble

[@wiverite]

@@adamkwiecinski2783 setting something on fire and then telling it to stop burning won't do much

[@robertwilson8184]

@@alaskanyeti907 No. It was in the exact same speech. It was simply edited out for the sake of the narrative.

[@FrostySnow1000]

@@robertwilson8184 yet people still went and rioted anyways? He still set the stage and sparked the people to go do it. He still incited all of it.

[@TheScreamun]

It’s just amazing how this is still ongoing and the procedure seems to be so painfully hard. The fact that the party accused of the wrongdoing on a government scale is able to blatantly Block and manipulate investigations and prosecutions is just nuts. How is the USA considered a first world country?! It may have a lot of wealthy and influential companies/ ppl living in it but on the other hand there’s so many more things that are just as bad as in 3rd world countries…

[@garrysmith1029]

Unlike other counties the US doesn't censor the media as much. Another reason since the US is so influential around the world people care about the US too much for every little thing.

[@arlaux1099]

@@garrysmith1029 Well give it a few months because the republicans, particularly those in the Supreme Court, are trying to actively roll back media and reporter protections. Heck, I can’t wait for when Arizon ups the “no filing cops within 8 feet” to “no filming cops within the area of a crime scene”.

[@iqbalindaryono8984]

@@TheRatsintheWallsWhy are you using the decades old meaning instead of using what people is using it for today? It's like using fa**ot to describe a bundle of sticks.

[@JosephArata]

The US is the world's richest poor country. The world's largest collection of unimaginably wealthy collective of people live here, while we have the highest crime and poverty rates of even 3rd world countries.

[@shevek2954]

The fact that that Georgia call alone hasn't put Trump in jail shows how screwed up our system is.

[@johnbenson4672]

In 1787, Franklin was asked what sort of government the delegates had created. His answer was "A republic, if you can keep it."

[@monstman99]

Bless you for having the heart to even make videos on this. I’m sure you get the worst hate mail over it but you’re doing good work

[@cjoweeable]

The keyword in this comment is “mail” 🤣

[@Eunostos]

@@cjoweeable You understand that in modern English that has become a catch-all for PMs and inboxes of all sorts, yes?

[@-bestii74]

@@Eunostos missed the joke. Mail in voter fraud

[@poppachoppa8956]

@@Eunostos You understand that he is making a "boomer" joke, immature but subjective, yes?

[@loturzelrestaurant]

@@poppachoppa8956 No better Election-Coverage than Holy-Koolaid and Some-More-News. They really dive-in forom different Angles. Videos like 'Revising God Prophecy' and 'Orange Man Indeed Bad' made me laugh so hard.

[@Durgenheim]

I don’t have words to describe how insane all of this is. Those who were involved in the events of Jan. 6 clearly communicated what they wanted, how they wanted to achieve it, and barely bothered to hide most of it. It’s astounding that much of this is still considered to be in some sort of legal grey area.

[@HeadCannonPrime]

We are a relatively young country. This is more or less the first time the "peaceful transition of power" has ever been tested. And apparently there are barely any real rules beyond a gentleman's agreement to make it happen.

[@zombiejoe326]

And yet AOC just admitted that officers from their own group let most of those people in Jan 6, and literally debunked every lie that this theater show has been saying.

[@efulmer8675]

That's what happens when the 1st Amendment protections are as strong as they are. Sure, everybody can say whatever, but it makes it difficult to pick through to the actual problems. This is by design though, whether it's a good design or not.

[@jesuslovesyou-mattsmith1502]

Was this the call for violence by trump at the end of his speech? "I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard."

[@efulmer8675]

@@jesuslovesyou-mattsmith1502 No. People usually refer to the "fight like hell" segment.

[@John_II]

Well-reasoned and presented. I cannot wait to see how this ends. :) What surprises me is that people still fall for the con run by the Trump camp. I know enough basic psychology to understand why it could happen, but Trump's shameless self-interest is pretty clear regardless of which way you vote (Democrat or Republican). I think the better question is "what has he ever done for you?" in exchange for one's unwavering loyalty?

[@LegallyChiyo]

Was so very lost on this whole trial but darn did you clear that up real fast! Amazing content and providing the details quickly and concisely!

[@MoeChicken]

I like to think that Devin uses a gavel to tenderize meat. And that he subpoenas the ingredients to appear in kitchen. I could also see him not adding extra seasonings because they weren't entered into evidence first. These things and more are how I assume the Stone Kitchen works.

[@loturzelrestaurant]

@@sarafinasummers7863 Eagle missed some stuff that Some More News covered in 'Greens War on Things She said'.

[@searchingfororion]

The shot of him holding the gavel with the onions just ended me man. 🤣

[@TheWwwyzzerdd]

I always wondered what exactly they thought would happen if the actually "found" an extra 11,000 votes and someone asked them where they came from. "Well you see... um... the votes... they.. fell off a truck! That's it. They just fell of the back of a truck... it was a great truck... had my name on it. That's how you know it's a great truck. Driver's a close personal friend of mine, great guy... but I didn't know him, you know. Anyway, these votes. Yeah they all voted for me because they love me and I'm the greatest president since that guy with the wooden teeth, you know who he is, but he was great like me. But these votes they just fell off the back of a truck. Nothing to worry about."

[@cyberoptic5757]

11000 ain't enough. They needed 11780

[@watchyourtimeco1]

Holy hell. You just channeled the man himself!

[@marylhere]

What? No one approached him with tears in their eyes?

[@SecretSquirrelFun]

It was a great truck 👍🏽

[@brianng3414]

Hahaha... great monologue. That is pretty much his shtick. Can't believe he was president and can't believe there are fools giving him money...

[@ivanclark2275]

I’m confused about why it’s so difficult to convict trump of inciting a riot or of intentionally interfering in proceedings of the government. He basically did everything short of going up to a judge and declaring “I intend on inciting a riot to interfere in the proceedings of the government.” He gave a speech where he told people to fight to keep congress from convening, then those people successfully fought to keep congress from convening. If this doesn’t qualify, what possibly could?

[@davidradtke160]

Because he put a lot of judges on the bench and lots of the potential jury members are his supporters. Makes convictions hard no matter what he did.

[@DannyBeans]

I went to high school with Jim Banks. We were on the forensics team together. And I cringe every time I see his name in the news. (Fun fact: don't believe his claims that he came from poverty. He was a high schooler with a cell phone in the '90s.)

[@MrFlarespeed]

"poverty" from the point of view of a rich person maybe

[@Revenkin]

It's terrifying that I'm just happy people are investigating just some of the shit that has happened. For so long it just felt like whenever something like this happens it's seen as "oh no.... Wonder what the next thing is". I'm just happy consequences are still a thing

[@Cpt_JohnRackham]

Never forget that not a single one of Epstein's clients has taken the fall. If Trump is arrested, it would suggest to me that he is innocent of government corruption. Our government is, undeniably, the largest terrorist organization in the United States. Corrupt tyrants don't gulag themselves.

[@Catarrhine]

Still waiting for ghislain maxwell’s little black book to lead to consequences… not gonna hold my breath though. If Trump, Clinton, and other big names were on that island, I highly doubt that book will see the light of day

[@AesirMO2]

The worst part is, there's a projected 50% chance that the Republicans will take both chambers of Congress after this midterm. If that occurs things are going to get loony when it comes to investigations. Even if just the house (which has an 87% chance to be won by Republicans) goes, then these committees and investigations are done.

[@CrazyYurie]

Are they?

[@Revenkin]

.... How did this get 200 likes so quickly?

[@DontMockMySmock]

i wonder if, in hindsight, that dude at 9:10 realizes the irony. "We want a free election" and "we want [a particular candidate] in office" are mutually exclusive desires.

[@TheEnigmaticOpaque]

Understanding the nuances of irony and how it works would require critical thinking skills. Trumpers don't use critical thought, or are completely incapable of it.

[@jj48]

There's nothing wrong with WANTING a particular candidate in office. Insisting that the election can ONLY be free if a particular candidate wins is where we start running into issues.

[@DreadHalfling9]

Im just dissapointed in my country if biden is the one to actually win. He is honestly just a frail old man who hardly knows whats going on. I feel like america might go way downhill if we dont have more people who understand how the world works vote.

[@jj48]

@@DreadHalfling9 Let's face it: no one voted for Biden. They voted AGAINST Trump.

[@DreadHalfling9]

@@jj48 very true

[@TheQuicksilver115]

It's so crazy to me that you continuously actually impress me with your ad segues, they're RIDICULOUSLY smooth! Every. Single. Time. Whatever you pay your writers, they still deserve a raise!

[@timjohnson7588]

Grateful for your consistent ability to make complex things understandable to laypeople like me. All the best.

[@aaronwhite1786]

It's wild to me that this many people are not only this corrupt themselves, but are willing to do all of this corrupt shit in support of a guy with a lifetime of screwing people over and throwing people under the bus.

[@knight0fdragon]

All of these people have it in their heads that "It won't happen to me" regardless of how many others it had happened to. They rationalize that it is always the victims fault for not being loyal, not Trumps.

[@TheModdedwarfare3]

He threw his only favorite child Ivanka under the bus as soon as she half disagreed with her father.

[@DeadBaron]

The hilarious part is you think you're owning Trump when you have just described Biden

[@eaterdrinker000]

@@DeadBaron : Biden is a centrist pushover, but Trump has actually failed at every private-sector business venture he has ever started, besides overcharging people to become a "billionaire." Yet Trump parrots the tired "conservative" narrative of "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" to "make America great again" (since 2009, anyway; before that he was all too happy to support New York Democrats). But, have fun blaming Biden for everything. You'll find it's not as fun as the Obama or Clinton years.

[@DeadBaron]

@@eaterdrinker000 Wow that's a lot of words, too bad I'm not reading them. Cope, seethe, dilate XD

[@LouieGrind]

I can not for the love of me think of a single reason of why a "non corrupt" country would not want to charge a person for these crimes.

[@brandonm949]

That perfectly explains why America doesn't want to charge Trump for these crimes. It's corrupt as hell.

[@LouieGrind]

@@brandonm949 Agreed.

[@Barton1921]

Because there are not actually crimes committed. Only allegations by a corrupt political war machine.

[@UncleKennysPlace]

The government is corrupt, and it doesn't matter who is in charge.

[@Barton1921]

@@UncleKennysPlace there's only one party hosting a political witch hunt hunt. And using the powers of Congress to take down political rivals. If you have any sense of history, this is always the step taken before authoritarians come to power, which always results in suffering. You may feel Republicans are corrupt but they are not following in the foot steps of authoritarians.

[@faemerothgoblinbane]

That was one of the smoothest sponsor transitions I've seen, especially on a channel with really smooth transitions! Are there any plans to put up a video update covering the new information obtained in reference to the USSS text messages that were "lost" on Jan 5 and 6? Edit: Could it be possible that the loss of text message records, if proven to be deliberate, be used as evidence of tampering with records for obstruction of justice charges?

[@daprobot6406]

Trump is that little kid who gets angry after loosing in a game

[@bmg50barrett74]

Gotta appreciate the confidence to segue from sedition and house arrested Oathkeepers directly into home cooking meals.

[@gnarthdarkanen7464]

Almost reaching Simon Whistler levels of smooth with that one. ;o)

[@planescaped]

@@gnarthdarkanen7464 Moar like Simon "do not recommend channel" >__>

[@gnarthdarkanen7464]

@@planescaped Which one? There's quite a few... and I was joking more about Brain Blaze than the others... ;o)

[@genaugmen4505]

Maybe trying to imply that they need to get those home-cooked meals in while they still have a chance

[@DouglasHollingsworth1]

NGL, watching a KZbin lawyer cover the conspiracy to overthrow a democratic election and then closing with an affiliate sponsorship ad completed with fully suited lawyer in a cooking apron was ... a very particular kind of cognitive whiplash I wasn't braced for.

[@ooooneeee]

Yay late stage capitalism!

[@yurei8]

Consider that legal advice is not free. Even though we get it for free, he deserves to be compensated for his knowledge.

[@DeadBaron]

I love how everyone can tell which way you lean and how biased your sources are just from "overthrow a democratic election" Walking down a hall unarmed is not overthrowing anything. The people that rioted in the Kavanaugh hearings and ran down those same halls did far worse.

[@JohnDoe-qz1ql]

He isn't a "KZbin lawyer", he's a lawyer doing KZbin videos.

[@arcturionblade1077]

@@JohnDoe-qz1ql You're technically correct. The best kind of correct, according to practicing lawyers!

[@jen4k2]

Great video, great analysis. Also, nice segue to the ad. :)

[@KatLovelandVoiceActor]

Man, your throat must be so parched after doing these vids, sooo much info! Well done! I felt that by the end you were like "Oh hell, there's still more. Okay, deep breath, I got this."

[@brianbanks3044]

Garland has to approach this like Mitch McConnell would....forget there are elections in 4 months, forget any promises the previous AG had stated and remember what they did to him when he would have been a sure bet for a supreme court justice....sure it is politics but all is fair in this game...the rule book was thrown away yrs ago by McConnell and Lindsay Graham....don't back down or the whole country is in worse trouble than they are now....if crimes were committed, prosecute them

[@tzvikrasner6073]

Garland has a rep for no leaks, and for hitting like Chuck Lidell in court. Mitch and Co are going to realize that keeping him off the bench was the biggest mistake of their careers.

[@alexlollar3293]

The democrats will never get ahead by playing nice or fair.

[@Bill_Garthright]

@@tzvikrasner6073 I hope so. But right now, Garland just seems timid... like most Democrats. I'm a Democrat, myself - there's really no other choice - but I get so frustrated at how timid, poll-driven, and politically inept most Democrats are. Why do they think they struggle to get Democrats to actually *vote?* Garland is all about the rule of law, yes. And I don't _want_ the Attorney General to be partisan - or the Supreme Court, either. But that ship has sailed. Republicans have already destroyed the Supreme Court. And we all remember Bill Barr. At some point, we have to make sure this stuff doesn't happen again by having actual _consequences_ for trying to overthrow our democracy - especially since Republicans are working hard to do the same thing in 2024. I've been patient with Garland. I've been _more_ than patient. But enough is enough! I need more than just wishful-thinking here.

[@orangutantapioca1530]

@@alexlollar3293 I’d say this goes beyond political lines, except the right wing have all accepted this blatant attempt to end our democracy and seem to be working towards the next attempt. That’s the problem with this type of delay of justice. If our democracy doesn’t immediately put an end to these schemes, the people behind them just keep trying until they find a scheme that works. It’s either the end of the sedition, or it’s the end of America. Thinking long-term, there is no other endgame.

[@darthparallax5207]

America loses if we dance to Russia's game fighting ourselves

[@thebandit7623]

Oath Keepers: Our cause is for the better. The ones that arrested: Yeah my former group are wack jobs.

[@benhislop1458]

Got that right

[@williamkelly8594]

Ok...

[@forrestunderwood3174]

@@williamkelly8594 Care to elaborate?

[@williamkelly8594]

@@forrestunderwood3174 it just people have no problem with certain groups burning and looting but have problems with certain groups who do not.. the Jan 6th thing is actually in the constitution. People believe the Russians hacked the 2016 elections but believed a certain president received the most votes in history.. yeah ok....

[@mattclarenzmendoza7127]

Hey, LegalEagle! I'm a new subscriber, i've came across you because of Dr. Mike. So in our local tv there's this korean drama on air lately titled "While you were sleeping" and it includes a lot of scenes where the main lead is in the Prosecution and i would like to see it getting lawyered by you. Although its on Prosecution i would still like to see you point out inaccuracies on there. I hope you see this.

[@low-energypolitics5677]

Thank you for this overview! 🙏

[@nathanielgreer2764]

Would you ever consider doing an episode on Miranda Vs Arizona? I know I keep asking this but it is such an interesting and important case. I think it would make an incredible video.

[@SylviaRustyFae]

Related to that... There's the recent SCOTUS case of Vega v Tekoh which has grtly affected the extent to which Miranda Rights are useful; and it wud be grt to hear a real lawyer tackle exactly what Vega v Tekoh has changed when it comes to our Miranda rights.

[@miz_logo_lee]

Also related to that is State (NJ) vs Hartley. It’s an early case of double homicide where the perpetrator was not properly Mirandized and thus let go. (I knew the victims and had not realized it was an example in law books).

[@UncleKennysPlace]

@@SylviaRustyFae Not at all, that case only says you cannot sue a cop if he forgets to read you your rights. Technically, if you know your rights, that would be a non-event, but anything you say at that point may not be admissible in court.

[@SylviaRustyFae]

@@UncleKennysPlace Not at all what? It 100% effects the extent to which they are useful; and this is also a relevant recent case to talk about regardin Miranda v Arizona.

[@marshabarsha90]

@@SylviaRustyFae I believe what he's saying is that it doesn't affect ones Miranda rights directly, it's still required in the exact same way. The only thing you can't do is go after a cop in civil court for not giving your Miranda rights. I think it would be useful for him to discuss this case to describe this exact nuance because many headlines were misleading

[@Iseerightthruyou]

I just happened to run into your video on the Constitution, and that brought me to this video. I have to say I am impressed with your thorough delivery of the information. I have subscribed and will be watching all of your videos. Good job sir.

[@orangutantapioca1530]

If you like those videos, you’re going to like a lot of his content. He always brings his A game when it comes to taking a complex topic and explaining in such a way that it becomes pretty easy to understand. Truly an intelligent and thorough man. Welcome to the channel!

[@Iseerightthruyou]

@@orangutantapioca1530 thanks. Yes it's refreshing to see his approach. I follow Glenn Kirshner, MediasTouch LegalAF, and a few others. When you find channels such as this, where everyone can listen and understand what is being said, (even if a person has limited knowledge of the Constitution and the law) and not feel alienated by the language, it can be a stress reliever. Especially with the tensions created by 6 years of Trump and his sycophants. I keep a copy of the Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and the Constitution beside me so I can reference it readily. While I consider myself an intelligent person, I can see with the language in the text, that some people find it hard to follow and understand. It is understandable as to why so many misinterpret the language. Anyways sorry for the ramble. Have a great day.

[@jasonimports]

Thank you as always for this and all of your incredible videos!

[@Captain_Pudding]

9:08 I like how he starts by saying he wants a fair election and ends by saying he wants Trump installed as dictator.

[@krehnah7541]

🎯

[@BlakeMcCringleberry]

I can't believe we lived to see a day that Andrew Johnson was toppled from the "Worst President Ever" position.

[@jaxsterminator8634]

TRUMP IS THE BEST PRESIDENT EVER HE WON AND DID NOTHING WRONG

The population of the US was 31m at that stage there is no comparison.

[@titan133760]

I thought that title goes to James Buchanan

[@masterofdoots5965]

I thought that happened with Herbert Hoover?

[@waynetec13]

As someone who's been in the system, and spent time in jail, I really wish people would stop referring to short sentences as "prison sentences." Our prison system is so overcrowded, most "prison" sentences are carried out in county jail, especially if it's less than 5 years. Jail and prison are VERY VERY different. To "free" people, they're probably used interchangeably, but should not be.

[@roquetlegume9628]

You've given enough info to allow others to commiserate with you, but just short of enough to let people understand what the difference is

[@waynetec13]

@@roquetlegume9628 It's difficult to explain. Many of the differences would likely be considered blurry semantics to someone who hasn't been to jail or prison, but when you're owned by the government, those semantic details are hard lines. The semantics literally define your daily life for the entire time you're behind bars.

[@waynetec13]

Ultimately, if someone is looking at less than a few years, every day of it will be served in jail, as it generally takes a minimum of 18 months to process people from jail to prison, up to a few years, but people in prison generally have several years to serve.

[@ericanderson7346]

I didn’t think anything approaching a year would be carried out in County Jail. never knew…..

[@johnhostetler2167]

@@ericanderson7346 I've known people to be in a county jail for up to 2 years

[@EqualsNorr]

Well explained without unnecessary information. Great vid.

[@valentkindred]

BTW good job in explaining the details, I appreciate a clear simple view on the matter.

[@Hyper_Fox06]

Please post an updated version including the intentional deletion of Secret Service texts within days of the subpoena from the Jan. 6 commission. Their phones are secure govt issue which all go through systems to record and monitor for classified information disclosure ect. The presidential records act, and other laws make it mandatory that that sort of information he examined and archived. James Murray faces numerous charges for this obstruction of Congress

[@UncleKennysPlace]

That's OK, Hillary got away with it, so can these clowns.

[@robertjonez5]

Ask Hillary Clinton

[@UGNAvalon]

Pretty sure emails on a private email server for a cabinet member aren’t on the same level as texts on the phones of the literal bodyguards of the POTUS. :P

[@jeffreypierson2064]

@@UncleKennysPlace As I understand it, all of her emails were searched by counsel and the ones that were requested in the subpoena were provided. That is being responsive.

[@joker1087]

@@UGNAvalon no they’re worse. there’s sensitive intel passing through those servers that are open to be stolen (which they were by a bernie staffer)

[@NeCoruption]

Fact: I never once wanted to be a Lawler due to the fact that you can expose ALL of this shit, and nothing happens. Being right about someone committing crimes doesnt even lead to anything if they have hands in politics

[@zelgiusthebrave1401]

Welcome to the US legal system, the epitome of "rules for thee but not for me"

[@Czarwinters3313]

Rules apply to everyone but the government. Meaning both left and right wing politicians are insane. If you lie to the government we get put in prison but if they lie to US it’s called being a politician.

[@Norrieification]

Honestly, at this point I really fear this stuff makes Trump supporters like him more not less, he just seems indestructible to them, and for weak people wanting a strong man to lead them that has to be appealing... I hope to god I'm wrong and this time, FINALLY something will stick. But I am so SO jaded that I just don't care any more.

[@OneLegFlamingo1]

Most lawyers don't practice criminal law. They push numbers around for corporations like everybody else.

[@VeliAntti]

At this point convicting Trump would lead to pandemonium. He'd still deny all wrongdoing and his followers would lap it all up and raise hell.

[@Lvnshyrn07]

I was wondering! Nicely done, dude. Thanks. 😊

[@mattkaz9604]

I always like these videos. Detailed enough to be interesting but not quite so dense as to get bogged down or be too technical.

[@loner419]

09:35 oh my god the irony of that situation is incredible. Saying we can't let them "overthrow our country" while standing 50ft from a mob trying to do exactly that. Reality has some amazing humor let me tell you.

[@utubepunk]

Absurdity is a component of fascism.

[@inefffable]

They know their positions are incoherent. They don't have a dedication to the truth like we do. Everything is reactionary, everything is on the table. All for the end goal of political power. The ends justify their means. Arguing facts and logic with a fascist is a hallow endeavor.

[@FutureMartian97]

Same with "we want a fair election" and then immediately claiming they want trump in office

[@None-lx8kj]

@@inefffable One of the few positive byproducts of the Trump era is that their hypocrisy and dishonestly was so brazen that at least some portion of the sane public has come to this realization. Pointing out to them that their weaponized incoherence is, in fact, incoherent is incredibly non-productive. They either already know and don't care or they don't understand and don't care.

[@Knifegash]

@@inefffable You disgrace the purity of that symbol by presenting it as a representative badge and then go on to explain how entrenched in the forms you are. You are misled, you are naive. You do not value truth.

[@ananthropomorphictalkinggo6641]

9:34 "We can't let them overthrow our country" she said, while attempting to overthrow our country.

[@linzlsleepy1627]

It’s really sad how many of those people were brainwashed into believing a blatant lie.

[@mereen750]

@@linzlsleepy1627 Like that government isn't slavery and you need it to get simple roads?

[@outofcompliance1639]

No one was overthrowing the country Jan 6th you dope. See it through their eyes for a second. They believed, and rightfully so, the election was scandalous. They had the right to protest. How it got out of hand is still unknown but it was not an insurrection, no way, no how. That is to stop Trump from running again.

[@mrbojangles8133]

they cheated Clinton in 2016 period

[@outofcompliance1639]

@@mrbojangles8133 They? Who are they and how did they do it? Maybe Clinton should have been less interested in setting up Trump with the Russia collusion hoax? Or not called half of America a basket of deplorables?

[@deejay2849]

Quality segue into the sponsorship portion of your video. 👏👏👏👏

[@AniHajderaj]

omg the hello fresh ad spot on this is hilarious

[@Solus3D]

Let me understand. In the USA law, if you believe in your own líes you're inmune to the law? This looks like laws to protect corruption.

[@Julia-lk8jn]

Even if the rioter chose to believe all those unproven lies, they still knew that beating police officers and smashing in windows was criminal. Same for Trump and his cronies.

[@efulmer8675]

There are some laws that have an "intent" aspect, such as the ones that are "Conspiracy to __" because the "__" was never committed, the only thing you really have left is the intent. A lot of these can be sidestepped if you can show that they, in some way, knew or were warned that whatever they were planning or doing would be a problem. Imagine: "I didn't think those donations would be used for purposes other than political ads." "We have records of X telling you that these funds were not going to political ads." This kind of exchange gives rise to at least one of fulfilling the intent requirement for the crime (they knew and let it happen) or the person has just committed perjury (which is also illegal).

[@insertianameia2224]

@@efulmer8675 I do want to add, not necessarily to you, but in general because I've seen people decide that due to this (or because of other cases or because they don't think it should matter at all,) that intent isn't important, when it is. Intent is important because it's makes a big difference. Example: one driver gets off their graveyard shift and falls asleep at the wheel, as when they started to drive they weren't that tired and they were just trying to get to the next off ramp so they can pull over at a gas station because pulling over onto the shoulder to nap is not only dangerous but illegal. They wreck into another vehicle and kill someone VS someone getting in their car and intentionally choosing to crash their car into a bicyclist on the shoulder, killing the person. Obviously one is worse than the other despite someone dying in both. That doesn't make either death more or less important. Or say lighting striking a house setting it on fire and a small child dying as a result vs someone intentionally setting the fire and trapping the child inside so they die. Or another way to look at it, for laws that DON'T consider intent is why you can actually spend many years in prison for picking up a single bird feather off the ground (god forbid if you have a collection of them.) Yes that's right. In the U.S. picking up a bird feather you found on the ground is considered messing with migrating birds (even if that bird doesn't migrate or it's the wrong time of year.) Can not land you in jail, but an actual prison (which are not the same thing.)

[@tadwimmer6225]

This poses a very interesting question, but I think you have to look at it a bit differently. If Trump honestly believed he had won the election, then his claim was not a lie __per se__, but a mistaken belief. For some of the crimes Trump could be charged with, there is an element of __mens rea__, or criminal intent. Given the facts as they've been presented by the committee this claim would imply a severe psychological disability. Although not presented by the committee, there is reason to believe this may be the case. Brandi X Lee's book, __The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump__ goes into great detail concerning potential psycho-pathology. Even if Trump was willing to use this defense, I think it would be a difficult row to hoe. Especially if the connection is made that he knowingly incited the riot at the capitol expecting it to turn violent. I think we are close to that point, subject to impeachment at any trial.

[@AnexoRialto]

Only if your rich, white, and powerful. You can avoid consequences from your crimes by claiming you didn't mean to commit crimes.

[@margotrosendorn6371]

It'd be nice if we see justice done, but there's no crime too big to dismiss these days.

[@kefkaZZZ]

I’m afraid you’re right good sir.

[@justalonelypoteto]

the level of mental masturbation required to conjure up the sentence "we're here to stop this corruption, we want a free election, with Donald Trump as the president" is truly outstanding. In engineering circles it is commonly said that "an engineer's job is making something idiot-proof, but then someone always comes along and invents a better idiot", but I'm starting to think with that guy we might have hit the limit

[@loyi-kyong]

Very interesting summary and that was fast paced! Phew!

[@katietoole8345]

The whole video is brilliant, but the Hello Fresh transition deserves an Emmy.

[@The_Modeling_Underdog]

Seconded.

[@narnigrin]

Subscribed for the law content, stayed for the stone-faced ad segues

[@katietoole8345]

@@narnigrin if I knew anything about video editing, I'd make a super cut of just his ad transitions.

[@taybug77]

He always gets me on the sponsor segue . Thought he was making a reference to the QAnon Shaman wanting vegan/organic options in jail. NOPE! Hello Fresh lol

[@orangutantapioca1530]

The segway was great, but isn’t Hello Fresh the company shutting down peoples’ livers with their legumes right now? I remember it being one of these food services, but I may be wrong about the exact one.

[@joeym5243]

Gotta tip my hat to ya, Mr Eagle, always coming out with some good current law review/breakdown videos.

[@SickSkilz]

If you mean biased content that walks the line close enough to pretend to be neutral.

[@lx4079]

@@SickSkilz you're vaguely gesticulating at bias cause reality makes you feel bad but you don't want to admit it Which is why you can't point out why he is actually biased, you just *feel* like he is

[@greenbeepm]

@@SickSkilz Then by all means, tell me why. Tell me why he is biased.

[@williampearson6299]

The fact that they filmed themselves on video

[@maybeasinner8007]

@@SickSkilz Yeah, it doesn't support what I believe so it's biased.

[@erikesspunkt3140]

Another great, info-packed presentation. Chapeau.

[@fox3808221]

GREAT sponsor placement on this one. I burst out laughing.

[@theenoogie]

Thank you for your civic service by making these videos. This is a very digestible summary of the facts and current status in this investigation.

[@Dr.MikeGranato]

We know Garland’s M.O. is to keep things quiet until the last minute, but it would be nice to know what he and his team are planning to do

[@camwyn256]

It would be nice to know if Garland was doing ANYTHING at this point. Because it sure seems like Garland is doing nothing

[@justmeandthethree]

Garland is going to punk out. THAT is his M.O.

[@WastelandBowman]

Garland is Federalist Society.

[@tzvikrasner6073]

@@justmeandthethree I would ask Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols, and Theodore J. Kaczinsky about that.

[@ELFanatic]

Garland is starting to feel like he's taking in Russian money too.

[@shawnofthedata]

Great segue into the sponsor at the end

[@Papershields001]

I’d love to hear the Legal Eagle take on the Alex Jones case. I’ve been following it closely and it’s pretty wild.

[@BigBlue615]

What's the point of looking at previous Supreme Court precedent when we know the current Court can and will throw every bit of it out given the chance?

[@CPFitzgerald]

Until they do, we have those precedents to work off of

[@None-lx8kj]

To fabricate the appearance of a functioning democracy.

[@ianashmore9910]

@@CPFitzgerald Why limit yourself to previous precedent when they don't?

[@efulmer8675]

@@ianashmore9910 Because precedents that incidentally protect the Republican party are the ones that we need to understand and plan around.

[@Bill_Garthright]

_What's the point of looking at previous Supreme Court precedent when we know the current Court can and will throw every bit of it out given the chance?_ Because the alternative is just to lie down and play dead, isn't it? The Christian Taliban on the Supreme Court are going to do whatever they want. We can't help that. (We _could_ have prevented that by voting for Al Gore in 2000 and Hillary Clinton in 2016 and for Democratic Senators in _every_ election, but it's too late now.) So all we can do is just _make_ them throw out actual law, if they want to keep doing that. It's not much, but it's better than just giving up and not even making them go to the trouble of ruling insanely. They're going to do what they're going to do. But we should make them do that publicly.

[@josephahles7529]

The fact that you fit this video into 30 minutes is absolutely incredible. Thank you for making this information so clear and accessible for myself and other individuals. Absolutely clear and concise with the information. Simply well done>

[@gotelc]

Seeing your hand reach on screen to cook the chicken while wearing your indochino suit 🤣

[@jamiejames2338]

Thanks for making this video legal eagle! Much appreciated, you're one of my trusted sources

[@reinhardtscheepers6317]

The fate of American democracy is reliant on the outcomes of these hearings. As a citizen of a fellow democracy I hope that this isn’t the start of the fall of the US.

[@neeneko]

Well, there is not likely to be any 'outcome', the real fate is going to come from the 2022 and 2024 election cycles.

[@arjaygee]

It's not that easy. Even if Trump and all his allies are indicted, found guilty, and imprisoned (which will probably cause a great deal of violence, if not an outright civil war), there is a large number of Americans who want to violently destroy our government.

[@4of20]

@@neeneko I agree with most of this, but a lot of people do not realize especially people not natively from the US, and also actually a lot of Americans as well, but the USA is not actually a democracy it is technically a Constitutional Republic which is basically a representative democracy which is in my personal opinion very open and subject to corruption. this comment is not meant to be divisive

[@CuZtuga]

@@4of20 A constitutional republic is still a type of democracy... I never understood this talking point

[@TheRibottoStudios]

The fall of the United States started when Trump became President honey. We've just been trying to prevent it from becoming a dystopian country. With so many insane people still drinking that Trump juice in charge, if Republicans win midterms, America as we knew it a place of equality and freedoms, will be dead.

[@glennpearson9348]

My hope is that even if Garland fails to get him at the Fed level, the Georgia AG gets him at the state level. If it plays out that way, then Trump gets to skip Club Fed and go straight to Georgia State Prison.

[@Julia-lk8jn]

I've grown awfully sceptical, but it's certainly an image that warms the heart.

[@jasonisaac9614]

as much as I would like this to happen. 0% chance it does. They've have Trump "dead to rights" so many times and nothing every happens.

[@glennpearson9348]

@@jasonisaac9614 Dead to rights for provable criminal activity? I don't think they've ever had that much evidence. They may not this time either, but we'll see. Trump calling an election official pressuring him to "find votes" certainly does seem like legitimate proof of intent to falsely alter an election (remember, part of that indictment would be that Trump KNEW he had lost the election and the 1/6 Committee has done a pretty good job of demonstrating that).

[@sjs9698]

for a non-us person, can you elaborate on the difference(s) between going to state & fed prison? by 'club fed' i guess you mean conditions are better in federal prisons?

[@mikelnu8224]

@@sjs9698 Federal prisons (run by the federal govt) has no parole (but you do get some time off for good behavior) ... and are somewhat better than state run prisons (like GA). But most states allow parole (and good time) meaning that there is a chance that a prisoner will only serve a part of their sentence while the other part is served while on the street - but under supervision by a parole officer. Neither prison system - IMHO - is a trip to the beach. Yesterday is tomorrow.

[@christophercaldwell6888]

I continue to find your videos both informative and hilarious. And the final humor is your impossible segues to your sponsor. Awesome! Care to wander into a snake pit? How about some videos on paternity, safe haven laws, pregnancies and paternity of minors, etc? Though I'm not sure you're going to find much humor ...

[@gimlisbeardcomb]

So much more level headed and sober of an explanation than the corporate media

[@thothmesx1]

Your videos are always informative, your outro, "or I'll see you in court", is well thought out, but your transitions into your sponsor's products is of the highest quality. No matter the product, SMOOOOTH transition!

[@NickMaurer]

Sometimes a video is painful to watch even when the content and execution is top notch. Reminders that our nation's party of "law and order" has contributed so greatly, illegally, and without punishment to our country's decline will simply always sting.

[@NickMaurer]

The Proud Boys and their leadership might be prosecuted, sure -- but heaven forbid we ever penalize a wealthy politician for the behavior that motivated the Proud Boys and other fallible citizens in the first place.

[@arturoaguilar6002]

They are only the party of "law and order" when law and order is on their side; in reality, they act more like the party of "loyalty above all else".

[@michaelahurt]

If you talk to individual voters a lot of them actually completely divest themselves from the people who went into the Capitol and vehemently support the prosecution of those people. Though obviously when it comes Trump himself it’s a different story. Now if you mean the party itself, they made a conscious choice during the Obama administration that they did not care about right or wrong, only increasing the power and influence of the party. But let’s be honest: both parties say what they need to say to get elected and then do what’s best for themselves once in office

[@hereturbie7458]

@Michael Hurt The people at the top tend towards corruption it seems. But the dems base is very much about compassion. In fact, that's the reason why they are generally pissed at Trump and his supporters. They are the ones who support education, medical care, and social security. And that message has been consistent with the dems for a long time.

[@michaelahurt]

@@hereturbie7458 pretty sure most Republicans would identify themselves as compassionate, pro-education and supporting quality health care and the elderly. But yes, anytime someone says the Dems should play dirty too my response is always: ‘They can’t. They have a conscience’ One of the bigger differences between left and right is people on the right to tend take a macro view (the greater good) and can justify bad things happening in small numbers IF there is sufficient good that comes from it. (And tend to be working with less information in my experience.) Whereas people on the left generally take a micro view (what produces the fewest bad outcomes is best). Ultimately it’s a philosophical difference and both perspectives have their uses. Very few people actually have a goal of making life worse for others; people just differ in how to produce the best outcome. Or even what the best outcome is.

[@eoinwhelan3116]

OK, that is the best ad setup I've ever seen hahahaha

[@Sweetstick]

OBJECTION! I love the way you sneak in sponsors even when it's kind of cringy it still looks fun if nothing else.

[@josephcoleman9753]

I absolutely love your videos. The way your able to break down legal speak and tell us what it actually means and how much research you and your team do to make each of these videos consistently is amazing.

[@localmenace3043]

The fact that most of these people will never see real consequences for their actions is… very unsettling. Not surprising, just disappointing.

[@orangutantapioca1530]

I gotta admit, as much as I think violence is a bad answer to societal problems, I can’t help but wonder why none of these guys ever get the crazies shooting at them. They’ve proven themselves to be outside of the law, meaning they are the ‘shadow power’ that those type seem to fear as the ‘real people running the world.’ If things don’t improve, I expect we’ll see something like that before the country implodes into itself.

[@mikairu2944]

@@orangutantapioca1530 *Laughs nervously as he thinks of Sri Lanka*

[@sijdnsd6460]

No one will see punishments most likely considering that if the committee is not done by Jan 3, 2023, Kevin McCarthy is just going to disband it.

[@spaceace4387]

@@sijdnsd6460 Good, the committee was a partisan kangaroo court that never should have existed in the first place, Pelosi packed it with Trump haters and kicked off Jim Jordan and Jim Banks because they didn’t vote to impeach Trump. Hopefully McCathy will start a committee to investigate Pelosi’s role in J6, the assassination attempt on Justice Kavanaugh and the 574 BLM riots of Summer 2020.

[@serenity1490]

Most people were already severely punished with unfair jail time for having been leery into the building itself. Though it is strange how Colbert's crew was there inciting violence but are let go with no punishment... Almost like it's all just politics >.>

[@theonlyegg]

That shot at 20:30 had me howling with laughter. Well played.

[@jaymz18]

the cooking video in the suit was great, good segment

[@aoenwyr]

I'm not from the US and don't know what LegalEagle's personal politics are, but he seems like the kind of person the US could really use in politics right now. Concise, knowledgeable and patient enough to explain how aspects of their national systems actually work. If as a foreigner I can come here and get a good picture of what is happening that really speaks to his capacity to communicate effectively

[@SioxerNikita]

Not really, he is biased like a lot of other people are. Beyond that his specialty is specifically law, doesn't mean he knows much about the politics.

[@zesky6654]

@@SioxerNikita He has a PolicSci background. He knows more than most.

[@SioxerNikita]

@@zesky6654 Did I say something different? His speciality is law, and he has primarily been practicing law. Whether he knows more than most doesn't necessarily make him qualified to necessarily educate on the matter. Considering his pretty harsh anti-conservative/republican bias, he would certainly not be a good choice for educating the public on the matter in terms of politics, because that bias will bleed through heavily, as it sometimes does in his videos. For someone to be qualified to talk about political systems, parties and the history you do have to have a relatively neutral stance or the ability to stay mostly objective, and no matter how much I enjoy Devin's content, I still wouldn't want to see him delve into Politics, educational or otherwise.

[@aoenwyr]

​@@SioxerNikita Everyone has personal bias and trying to use that as an argument to limit or restrict who can engage in politics is really just a way to control whichever narrative it is you're trying to push, wherever you fall on the political spectrum Also restricting political participation to ONLY those who meet very narrow educational backgrounds excludes entire demographics of people who absolutely should be involved. Especially when these goal posts are set by those who traditionally have greater access to tertiary education. Demanding potential participants be neutral when the system is an absolute dumpster fire of partisanship is a joke. It's right up there with people calling others emotional while they rage post about rainbows violating their freedom

[@SioxerNikita]

@@aoenwyr Yeah no point in talking to you. Because I never said the words restrict or limit, or even imply that, and you make an entire comment about that.

[@BenignComrade]

With all of this, and if it does not go anywhere (supposed leak that garland will not prosecute) this becomes practice. And then they will try again.

[@PrograError]

well... even if they don't prosecute, I think unless the party is real tone deaf, and still wants to lean on trump, that section of electorate is radioactive. those who "woke up" are likely to not vote trump, but I doubt even 1% actually woke up...

[@TheRibottoStudios]

The only reason they didn't succeed is because everyone stayed put. If you take a look, a LOT of the outcome of so many coups come down to something small like this: Can we get one guy into a car? If ANYONE left that building that day, they'd have been strung up like a criminal. Ruben Gallego- an Arizona Congressman-was right when implored his fellow Representatives to NOT leave the Capitol. If any had, it would've been a blood bath. And Democracy dead.

[@jimmyxx9522]

If there are no consequences it becomes a dry run for the next attempt.

[@o.b.7217]

That's why it's so important to vote BLUE in EVERY election.

[@taybug77]

it's all a political game from both sides. I ID as blue, and I still have doubts about my candidates a majority of the time. None of them want real change or real progress or real justice. They want self-benefiting policies and power. Except Bernie. He was pure. And that's why he failed.

[@wahrorestey1653]

I just had a thought of my own. In your introduction message I don't know what I'm surrounded by!

[@stevemartin4863]

Seamless transition into Hello Fresh! Loved it!

[@filmgirlLisa]

I have been waiting for this video for weeks. Thank you for being much more succinct than any of the news commentators. And big props to the researchers!

[@Happy.Place.]

It makes me unhappy to hear a sitting president speak of votes as though they were a negotiable value, a fiat currency to be haggled over. Thank you for all that you do, this video did make me happy.

[@Patrickf5087]

Considering a large portion of states have changed the system of electoral college votes to if there is a 1 vote majority that ALL electoral voted go yo the party that wins. Its a very sad day in "Democracy"

[@thorjelly]

@@Patrickf5087 You say "changed" as if that wasn't already the case for the past 150 years.

[@flaminginferno6641]

@@thorjelly ......yea our democracy kinda sucks...

[@KaitouKaiju]

Votes are in fact a currency to be haggled considering how much is done to manipulate the way votes are counted, eg gerrymandering

[@connfeebruh9439]

@@KaitouKaiju Gerrymandering, granny farming, ballot harvesting, identity theft/voter fraud, dead voters, etc. There really are ALOT of ways the vote is manipulated in the US

[@edwardkania9622]

Awesome to see that you made this video. Please tell us about the hate mail you receive if any.

[@ashten2005]

Wouldn't the deletion of secret service's text be considered destruction of evidence? Also, wouldn't Lauren Bobert's tweet revealing the relocation of house members be considered an act of treason?

[@clashcitywannabe]

Treason is the aiding and abetting of an enemy during wartime. Very few people have ever been charged with treason in this country. There's John Brown for Harper's Ferry right before the civil war, and there's some soldiers who defected to the nazis during ww2 and that's about it. Of all the things anyone could be charged with, it's not treason.

[@ThaiWanBraZeal]

How about Nancy Pelosi's phone records?...

[@the_last_ballad]

@@ThaiWanBraZeal I assume there's something specific you are referring to?

[@The_ZeroLine]

@@ThaiWanBraZeal What about them, MAGAT? And, you’ll notice, unlike Trump, even democrats don’t like her. And if they contain evidence she’s done something illegal, she should be prosecuted for it. It’s like saying “well, OJ got away with murder. Therefore, so should I.”

[@ThaiWanBraZeal]

@@The_ZeroLine When people are willing to hear both sides of any issue... respect...but when you resort to mockery or name.calling...you show your hand as either a schill or ignorant

[@DeaconShadow]

“We want a free election. We want Trump as President”. Those two statements are at odds, Blobby.

[@MM-vs2et]

Can't expect anything but cognitive dissonance from rural West Virginians

[@noone-gf5op]

this people really cannot fathom reality being different than how they want it to be.

[@samo1198]

@@MM-vs2et lmao 🤣 very well put

[@psquare2260]

No matter what committee finds, no GOP leader is going to be indicted. Only some Trump supporters will suffer. Also, GOP is not going to learn any lesson from this. ( You can wakeup someone sleeping. But you cannot wakeup someone pretending to sleep.).

[@stefanstruger9949]

if Trump wins in 2024, he should immediately set all his supporters free, the law is broken, we need to protect our own.

[@neeneko]

The GoP will probably learn the same lesson it has from so many previous iterations : that they can still push the envelope further since this again will not hurt them.

[@laurahubbard6906]

The Maryland Republican primary elected a Trump-endorsed lunatic for Governor over a more centrist Hogan-backed candidate. The state had better make sure that November brings us a Democrat in the Governor's mansion.

[@Lolatyou332]

Literally only Centrists should be able complain about the extreme actions of each side. Far-left and Far-right are both terrible and it just shows when you identify with one political group you only look at the bad another group does, while thinking your political group is perfect and correct. Literally both sides follow the same politics, both the right and the left have incited violence. Doesn't make sense why the far-left politicians aren't also being charged for inciting violence to the same degree.

[@damageman]

Don’t say this stuff. With that attitude you will be right. We just need to wait until trump gets the nomination and we can arrest him.

[@Skullmiser]

I like how LegalEagle was wearing his suit even while cooking in the kitchen.