American reacts to the Power of NATO military VS Russian military

[@stefanpajung113]

Jens Stoltenberg has since been replaced by Mark Rutte as Secretary General of NATO. (October 1 2024).

[@uhwake]

trump must be very happy about that. he hated stoltenberg.

[@BlindeEzel]

@@uhwake Being hated by Trump is a badge of honour.

[@uhwake]

@@BlindeEzel true

[@gercykiba]

fact

[@JoannDavi]

@@BlindeEzel - Face it: Trump's your daddy.

[@uniquename111]

War is between a few people in charge, the rest are just people who don't want war.

[@to_loww]

Not even in between. I'm pretty sure that Zelenskyy will be happy to cease fire when Russian troops withdraw from Ukrainian territory.

[@mirror452]

I would recommend not taking those videos too seriously. They are highly misleading.

[@RSProduxx]

2:25 mutual destruction agreement ... It is agreed upon that any nuclear power, if attacked with strategic nukes, must be able to counterstrike and thus both parties would be annihilated ... Fun, right? :)

[@jordanclark4635]

MAD Mutually Assured Destruction

[@RSProduxx]

@@jordanclark4635 yeah, that one =)

[@danitabori]

There is a youtuber called Jake Broe, who makes videos about the Russian war and he always starts his regular videos showing the losses of the Russians. He also has special videos that might be interesting to react too: "Why Russia Will Not Use Nuclear Weapons in Ukraine" and "NATO expansion is a lie". He used to work with nukes, so I think he is a good source for these topics.

[@afiiik1]

I support checking out Jake Broe 👍

[@RSProduxx]

everyone who´s not a P*tin fanboy knows that the NATO expansion is a lie. It´s simply the justification of the war towards his own people. Same as probably all "reasons" he ever mentioned.

[@primoz1231]

I watch His videos every time He post them. I don't always agree on everything He says, just most of the time (90%)

[@wildgeesemediaagency]

31 countries combined against a single country and most things are very close....incredible

[@koyaanisqatsi78]

Watch this bit if you didn't know there were so many detonations " A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 - by Isao Hashimoto"

[@brittabrauer-pi8dq]

Since a few weeks the genera secretary is msrk ruette from the netherlands. Because ofvthecwar in ukrsine mr stoltenberg prolonged his serving time for about 1 year. Greetings from germany🇺🇸 🇩🇪

[@RSProduxx]

omg, please learn to read a 2nd time before sending. your not in a commenting race here ...

[@primoz1231]

You are missing something very important. Yes they would have more numbers if China joins. But If We are talking about WW then NATO would have other allies that certainly wouldn't want to see them winning; Australia, Japan, South Korea....

[@sobanya_228]

Russia vs Nato is like David vs Goliath. Except Goliath has a whole gang with him. And David has more nukes.

[@sophiastorm8616]

And China...that would make it a lot more even

[@gio-oz8gf]

Each of them has enough nuclear weapons to destroy all life on the planet many times over. According to UN estimates, more than 2,000 nuclear tests have been conducted all over the world, with around 22,000 nuclear weapons globally-enough to destroy humanity and other biological organisms on Earth 55 times over.

[@gio-oz8gf]

@@sophiastorm8616 I have a feeling that China is more likely to aid in the destruction of Russia than to wage war against the West, which would ultimately result in its own destruction. They are communists, not madmen.

[@sobanya_228]

@sophiastorm8616 china and russia are barely even allies.

[@JoannDavi]

@@sophiastorm8616 - Assuming no nukes are involved the US has more satellites than Russia & China combined, more planes, more carriers....

[@avsbes98]

In general the rough difference between Strategic and Tactical Nuclear Weapons is how they're upposed to be used and thus their power. Strategic Nuclear Weapons are "City-Busters", to be used against the population centers of a hostile power to ensure that the cost of war is at a maximum to serve as deterrence. Tactical Nuclear Weapons are supposed to be used against actual Military Targets against which conventional weapons aren't powerfull enough and are thus supoosed to be used in a hot mostly conventional war, for example against an Aircraft Carrier, an Airbase or a Command Bunker.

[@avsbes98]

5:32 In case you want to check out one angle of how much it has weakened Russia i'd recommend watching some of the newest videos by Perun: "1,000 Days of War in Ukraine - Russia's IRBM Strike, Trends & The Forces after 1,000 days" & "Russian Equipment Reserves (2024) - Production, Losses & Storage Depletion"

[@BurnCorpoStuff]

Badass "so far"

[@Code_Production]

no one wins even if there is 10x more of us ......

[@afiiik1]

Aside from Jake Broe, Perun has excellent videos on each country's strategy, resources etc. It's not as simple as a numbers comparison.

[@gorran91]

For those who don't know what ICBM means ...Intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) is a ballistic missile with a range greater than 5,500 kilometres (3,400 mi)

[@damienzwikstra1667]

Jens Stoltenberg has been replaced already it is now Mark Rutte

[@t.a.k.palfrey3882]

To say he was replaced suggests he did something wrong. In fact, he agreed to stay on an extra two years after his term had ended. Militarily, the Supreme Allied Commander is currently a US Army general. The deputy is a British admiral.

[@JoannDavi]

@@t.a.k.palfrey3882 - The Supreme Allied Commander is ALWAYS an American, just as it should be.

[@nabuli_9337]

The Zar Bomba had a yield of 50, 57 or 58 Mt of TNT, depending on source.

[@baltazar1682]

This video is revealing you are not paying close attention to geopolitics. ;-D

[@DaveHaze]

Yep.

[@JoannDavi]

@@DaveHaze - He's not bright. (His brother Tyler -- even more dim.)

[@Dutch1961]

"Si vis pacem, para bellum" If you want peace, prepare for war (Plato's laws, 4th law. 347BC)

[@kuplung22]

That is what we know. Russia is not joke.

[@MostlyPennyCat]

Yeah, Russia is a joke. They couldn't even beat Ukraine.

[@stevendeamon]

Take everything the russians supposedly have with a grain of salt. Theyve said they had a lot of military capability over the years and we've all seen what they can actually do in a war with a near peer adversary.

[@Zileas01]

that kinda goes for a lot of EU militaries too. it will take them years to recover from 30 years of underfunding. most of them don't have that much recent combat experience either, many of them left the heavy lifting to the US during their deployments in the last few decades. the US hasn't fought a near peer adversary in a long while either, but they do keep busy which is the next best thing. the other big flaw in nato that's always been known but has recently been painfully exposed is the reliance on high tech long procurement time weapons as opposed to the basics. nato plans for a big war typically go for a very intense but very fast war, with no real contingency for the attrition slugfest that will follow if it doesn't lead to a decisive advantage for either side. and unlike WW2, you can't convert a car factory to a cheap basic tank/plane/shell factory in the same way anymore.

[@MostlyPennyCat]

France and the UK have an all-elite infantry, they've never lost their edge. The Scandinavians are all still terrifying. And there's a LOT of South American nations with series battle-hardened infantry that are always down for hunting Russians, there's a bunch of Columbians in Ukraine. And then there's Poland. 😬 Poland is scary.

[@Takketa7]

Well the Russians seem to have a really low amount of Flying Tankers only 19!

[@mirror452]

They don't need them.

[@JoannDavi]

@@mirror452 - Yeah, because their air force is garbage and their only carrier is non-functional.

[@oh515]

What year was this video from?

[@gagada124]

Heres a thought, from now on in wars instead of Countries sending an army just send the heads of the Government and small army instead, like the "old days". I get a feeling wars would die out.

[@JoannDavi]

How about the defense ministers? If Pete Hegseth gets confirmed, he'd mop the floor with the ministers of the other countries.

[@Steffe]

You need to watch world news more if you did not recognize the former NATO boss.

[@RSProduxx]

A German General said a few days ago that Russia is "burning through" about 30k soldiers/ month currently ...

[@debrickashaw9387]

NATO is the strongest military force in human history. Even if every single country not in the alliance were combined it wouldn't be close in conventional military force. But if it comes to that, then nukes would be the great equalizer.

[@yaakeen01]

The fact that we are comparing an alliance of more than 30 countries with just 1 country, itself defines how powerful Russia is.

[@JoannDavi]

USA > Russia The rest of NATO is just extra fluff.

[@PDVism]

@@JoannDavi Sure, the USA provides half of the the troops and hardware in NATO which means that the other countries provide the other half... which mean that the European countries working together in NATO still out class NATO by a far margin. Calling them 'fluff' shows that you are badly educated, ill informed or just stupid.

[@to_loww]

And yet Russia hasn't achieved any of their objectives in their "special military operation" that was supposed to be over in three days. In just one country. Sending over a thousand people per day in the meat grinder. And they chickened out of Syria.

[@yaakeen01]

@@to_loww I am sure if Russia wanted to destroy Ukraine, like US destroyed Iraq, with no regards to civilians life. Russia could have also achieved its goals much sooner. Just for fact: In the first few weeks US have killed more Iraqi civilians, than what the total casualties are in the Ukraine war after almost 3 years.

[@zipline5248]

Also consider that though in the event of a war (Which i hope does not happen) Russia would have allies like China and more, Nato would also have allies, such as Australia, South Korea, Japan and many more.

[@markoDbogdanovic]

The level of ignorance in your reasoning is mind-boggling.

[@Code_Production]

considering nato is alot of countrys together including usa ... and russia has equal number or more of power is simply baffling but put in math usa is half strenght of russia so is europe too but together they are about the same hardware wise

[@Hi---There]

2000 nuclear tests it without China, India and others

[@Janzius1]

3000+ tanks destroyed on video. So much more without counting

[@Nico_Sama]

You should watch one of Perun's videos instead of this facebook-grade crap.

[@JoannDavi]

This is as much as Ryan's little brain can handle.

[@oleksandrbyelyenko435]

The video is outdated and relatively old

[@bawrytr]

This is asinine from the get-go. EU population is half the stated number, maybe a little over half if you toss in the UK, which is still in NATO. Make a mistake like that, it's hard to trust anything else.

[@Thee_Penguin]

Silly comparison. If war broke out involving the USA & UK then Russia would not be alone. They too have allies, you need to realise the middle east, N Korea, India, Belarus and other countries would side with Putin, can't just think it would be NATO v Russia

[@AHVENAN]

North Korea and Belarus sure, but India, I highly HIGHLY doubt that, sure they've been buying oil from Russia since all the west stopped doing so due to the war, that doesn't make them a full on ally of Russia....

[@davidmontgomery9846]

Russia's allies are an illusion .They are only interested in what they can get off Russia .They will not go to war with N.A.T.O .they will sit on the sidelines because they know N.A.T.O. will crush them .

[@Chris31bln]

India would not help Russia. They have good relations with the West, as they have with Russia. They would then be more neutral. India is also in a kind of military alliance with the USA, Japan and Australia against China. And the Middle East doesn't like Russia very much either, especially after the fall of Syria, the Middle East is no longer of any help to Russia, the only one still on Russia's side is Iran and it has been weakened by Israel.

[@JoannDavi]

- Assuming no nukes are involved the US has more satellites than Russia & China combined, more planes, more carriers....

[@Jan-i-tor]

Russia proofed to let their allies down, Armenia, Syria, Mali. The world saw that. Also you forget South-Korea, Japan and other Asian countries which will oppose China and Russia. Its not that easy.

[@Sat-Man-Alpha]

Now I know it for sure: The americans believe that Movies are the real history and if there is no Movie about a historical Event it didn‘t happened😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@JoannDavi]

Fact: 1.) Ryan is dumb. 2.) The USA is the most important and powerful nation.

[@vladokalaba2640]

There are two thing which is not included in video: 1. Russian rocket weapon is much better than NATO 2. Russan war expiriance is huge because Ukr. war so with those two Russia go on top. P.S. Russian anti air deffense is strongest on world

[@JoannDavi]

LMAO. With a name like "Vlad," it's to be expected.

[@vladokalaba2640]

@@JoannDavi I am not Russian and I am never been in Russia soo... You have something against name Vladimir :D

[@PDVism]

1. no it isnt 2. with all that experience they sure are making a dogs dinner of it PS : Russian anti air defense is so great that no place in Russia has ever been hit by Ukraine missiles or drones, except for all the times that it has been. Even 300 miles deep into Russia.

[@CoL_Drake]

and its honestly all useless ... a war nato vs russia will always end in nuclear holocaust we all die in flames ... the rest of the army tanks planes ... its all just paper at a gunfight xD

[@to_loww]

If it's a deterrent it's not useless.

[@andysadler6432]

Yes Nato is badass and the trumper wants to destroy it.............smh

[@archiebald4717]

No, he wants Europe to man up and pay what it agreed to pay.

[@JoannDavi]

@@archiebald4717 - Indeed. (Don't forget the worst: Canada.)

[@to_loww]

@@archiebald4717 What Trump claims can change the very next day. And he falls for the disinformation that Putin spreads. Europe does not have a dependable partner with the USA under Trump.

[@MaoZhu-j6q]

Totally irrelevant as Putrid has lost most of his weapons and soldiers fighting Ukraine. The war in Ukraine also showed that most of Putrids weapons are not even second rate, they are hopeless.

[@afiiik1]

And that's why we don't want him to get Ukraine and use it's people, resources and weapons against us.

[@CoL_Drake]

its irrelevant as nato vs russia would be a nuke war it ends after 1 hour and we are all dead ... no need for an army

[@Arthas747]

😂 WhatsApp a BS

[@pedrosantos6291]

U r comparing 1 COUNTRY against 30 stupid 😂 and yes RUSSIA it's not alone on this ...

[@JoannDavi]

- Assuming no nukes are involved the US has more satellites than Russia & China combined, more planes, more carriers....

[@jakubosiejewski9859]

Pity that Americans voted for Trump

[@JoannDavi]

Why? Because he's going to force the rest of you to pony up (as you should)?

[@uhwake]

@@JoannDavi he can force his wife. but not us.

[@DaveHaze]

Whole EU would vote Trump if possible its better for you and for us here in EU buddy ;)

[@JoannDavi]

@@uhwake - So, you want benefits without obligations? Definitely a lefty loon mentality.

[@louisl2829]

True for some countries but most of the countries who need American help are already doing it. Trump is exaggerating, classic business man's talks

[@entador5374]

"American reacts to the Power of Amercian military vs Russian military" USA contributes of 70% of NATO expenses

[@DaveHaze]

Yeah and Nato cant do nothingwithout States even UK's and Germany's long range missiles need to be guided by American personel (ATACM, Storm shadow ect).

[@gio-oz8gf]

Or, American reacts to the ability of the American military to destroy all life on the planet vs. Russia's ability to do the same. They are not abilities to be proud of. We are supposed to be civilised.

[@stevendeamon]

Good. NATO is strong thanks to USA. That's why they are the greatest superpower on Earth.

[@tomvanaarle2622]

NOPE the USA covers about 17% of NATO expenses, the same as Germany. You are "confusing" NATO expenses with the national defense budgets of NATO countries. Arguably a good proportion of NATO countries spend less than the agreed upon 2% of their government budget on their national defence. But no NATO country has ever requested the USA to spend about 30% on their NATIONAL defense budget. And considering Germany has a population of 84,5 million compared to the USA 335 million and the countries paying over 10% have a population in the 60 millions the country actually not paying its "fair share" is .... the USA.

[@arnodobler1096]

Uh no, it has the highest own "defense" (cough) budget. But not everything concerns NATO. In the NATO budget, NATO joint financing: Germany and the USA each account for the largest share (15.88%), followed by the UK (11.96%) and France (10.19%).

[@MTDucas]

Most of the numbers that shows russia to have as equipment they have already lost in Ukraine

[@lottapotta74]

And imagine if Ukraine had kept their nukes ( 1700 ) instead of giving it to russia in exchange for defense from Nato, hmm

[@tomvanaarle2622]

They did not give them to Russia "in exchange for defense *from* NATO" but to aquire the freedom to join the EU or NATO for that matter without Russian interference. Putin violated that agreement.

[@JoannDavi]

I don't think Ukraine would've had much of an economy had it kept the nukes.

[@MostlyPennyCat]

Russian Allies: Belarus Iran North Korea 😂

[@vickiepower6201]

This we definitely do not need no matter what??????? WW111 ????????

[@phoenix-xu9xj]

You don’t give into bullies and that’s what Putin is he’s a bully and he threatened us for years. I can’t cave into somebody because they threaten you. And like all bullies, he is a coward. I’m guessing you weren’t born after the war like I was. I was, he would understand, appeasement doesn’t work

[@silveryuno]

14777 Russian Tanks hahahaxD Best joke so far!

[@StevenQ74]

Not only Russia would have allies, remember countries Australia and Japan for instance are not in Nato but would fight with NATO against Russia

[@paulflame8863]

look up the Qresnik missile that was used in the Ukraine last week

[@JoannDavi]

Why? It was nothing new/special.

[@DaveHaze]

Russia is restoring weapons used in Ukraine and at 3 to 4 time's speed than whole collective west is not just Nato and with that i mean South korea too witch is if you didnt know in 2024 the largest exporter of weapons. But i will say lots of those numbers are just inflated by both sides the real ones you will never know, and how much of that is operation is another question on both sides, but Nato compared to Russia is wolf without teeth and cant do about nothing long range without American army. Russians is also the only army that has hypersonic missles in their armory lots of them we haven't even seen and are not defendable by west while other way around they are defendable you can see in Ukraine about 6% arms is only effective now compared to start of the war that was about 75%. Yeah maybe skip videos like that cuz they are just propaganda, you probably dont see the other side of news cuz you are heavly censored in states. Brics economy is about 15x times stronger than g7 area is (where we are) and has about 4-5x the population soo you would not wanna see WW3 cuz EU would be flatned cuz majority of the EU population is old (demographics) and this time war would visit you in states. So hopefuly you(America) stop sending money abroad cuz you guys need it more and we dont need more wars in EU or middle east.

[@JoannDavi]

Um, right, Vlad. Kyiv in 3 days! LMAO

[@DaveHaze]

@@JoannDavi Kiyev in 3 days is propaganda from Ukraine's foregin minister buddy, do educate yourself a bit more BOB! And read Minsk Agreements that you wauched for while you are at it.

[@alia7960]

Lmao. Stop pretending BRICS is gonna help you out. Brazil obviously not. India obviously not. South Africa obviously not. And honestly, even China wouldn’t join in, especially if Russia starts the invasion, which is almost a certainty. The only thing BRICS is interested in is countering America’s economic hegemony, none of them are gonna be slaves to Russia’s imperialism anymore than they are to America’s. Delusional Vlad.

[@theneverwhere6076]

@@JoannDavi Just saying, Ukraine lost around 20-30% of ALL tech during counter-offensive in just two weeks. And, well, how to say it, Ukraine has (had) more of battle tech in certain areas than current Germany.

[@CeeRub]

You should look at 'NATO vs BRICS'. Russia is part of the BRICS alliance, like we are with NATO. Puts things much more in perspective..

[@StevenQ74]

Brics is not a millitairy alliance

[@JoannDavi]

BRICS is NOT a military alliance (and as an economic alliance, it's pretty lame).

[@CeeRub]

My bad. I always thought so because there are so many military comparisons between the two on yt.

[@PDVism]

You honestly think that Brazil would fight with Russia against Nato ?

[@ChrisShelley-v2g]

Odd how he just sees numbers/amounts and draws his conclusion from that, the lack of critical thinking is frightening in an amusing type of way, which might explain why the US is quick to go to war and even quicker to jump ship and bail out when things aren't going the way they were expecting/hoping for.

[@JoannDavi]

Don't make the USA obliterate you.

[@Jan-i-tor]

Im happy to be part of NATO. Maybe its no perfect alliance, but the best one we have. Thank you Poland especially, please be patient with us Germans until we catch up!

[@kuplung22]

Nato north Atlantic terrorists organization

[@Blutroth]

As Austrian i'm glad we're not in the NATO. But i'm also glad for the neighbor countries austria has :D hehe hehehehe

[@JoannDavi]

Hmmm. Tell me about Austria in the late 1930's....

[@trishloughman5998]

What an utter waste of money.

[@pietervoogt]

Russia has an economy smaller than Canada, so having so much military spending says something about their mentality. They could have spent the money on science, education, and healthcare like other countries, especially with all the gas money coming in for decades. They wasted their wealth in corruption and guns. In 2025 many analysts predict they are out of money.

[@JoannDavi]

Just as pathetic: Canada has a lower ranked military than countries with a smaller population like Australia.

[@Jan-i-tor]

Alone Bavaria makes half of the Russian economy. But its all relative since the economy worldwide is heavily dependent on global trade, that counts for EU, USA and China as well.

[@armelior4610]

Spending tons of budget on military instead of education, medicine etc. ? Why does this remind me of another country ? And sitting on a giant pile of oil, gaz and other natural resources is no small asset, which again is true for both

[@pietervoogt]

@@armelior4610 Russia spends 6% of GDP, USA 3% world average is 2%

[@kuplung22]

Just think about it. Russia is only one country. You can't beat them. They are hardcore slavs. Im not slav but donr provoce slavs.

[@to_loww]

Russia just abandoned their only military outpost outside the former USSR.

[@JoannDavi]

Ryan = simpleton = 🤡

[@MaryRaine929]

Hey! Long time no see! Reported you, like in the good old days.😉

[@MaryRaine929]

@@BSA-AirRifle-Plinking Guess, my dear.😉

[@aleosa5849]

🇮🇱💙🇺🇸