Ames Moot Court Competition 2023

[@ColtonBlumhagen]

Raise your hand if this came up in your recommended and you have no clue what's happening but still watched the whole thing.

[@AbundantChris]

It’s a mock trial for Harvard Law School students simulating a Supreme Court hearing.

[@ColtonBlumhagen]

@@AbundantChris I know that lol. As far as what they're arguing, that is what I didn't get.

[@johnmallino1088]

The case is essentially determining whether or not the court has the jurisdiction to award a judgement in favor of the victim in a PPE covid-era rule violation (the victim being the second team to present), and if the court does, what that punishment should be.@@ColtonBlumhagen

[@Ysnchris]

@@ColtonBlumhagen it mostly sounds foreign when you don't have the actual case. Once you watch the video, unless you watch to maybe learn tactics or to analyze something you won't get much from the actual case🙂

[@instaves]

@@AbundantChris you dont say

[@mnrieux]

I could not handle the level of intense and immediate grilling from the judges. My anxiety would go through the roof. These students killed it… im so impressed.

[@samg5753]

Agreed! Justice Liu was especially tough... he reminded me of a great university professor that asks the tough questions to help his students think on their feet and go the extra mile in order to grow and learn. Bravo to both teams

[@reginayfavors]

I'm not a crybaby, but I might become one that day.

[@grapefruitsyrup8185]

Its actually very easy, their questions are also predictable. Theres nothing to be impressed.

[@davidwu0667]

Because you are weak

[@KenriqueMaling]

exactly! their confidence is commendable.

[@jcola2296]

I don’t know how someone could ever go and have the floor to present an argument in front of that massive audience and a Supreme Court justice without completely breaking down from nerves, especially someone who’s new to the field, hats off!

[@pulee1001]

When you study, practice, and know God, it’s easy, because you realize Supreme Court Justices are ‘man’ and flawed, as we all are.

[@davidc4408]

F it. We are going to die one day. Just go balls out in life. You only have one life

[@LivingbyLeah]

If you want people to take you seriously, you need to act like you own the place.

[@orangutank626]

As a computer teacher honestly, Most people arent really focusing on what your saying but wondering what they will do in your place. especially during an examination such as this. Speaking in front of teenagers for years you kinda loose that grip of anxiety. Also really knowing your material helps immensely.

[@lugia8888]

It’s not hard just practice a few times. My first time was rough but after a while it became natural

[@Sleepybear6032]

SUPREME COURT JUDGES FOR MOOT COURT COMPETITIONS! this is terrifying.

[@Ugh99]

To bring up Many more Supreme Court Judges who are better, more just and critical in their judgement

[@kaybay5210]

@@Ugh99 such as? lol

[@Ugh99]

@@kaybay5210 You just saw them in the video

[@deepankarchakraborty236]

Explanation: The Moot Court Competition at Harvard Law School was debating a fictional case involving the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and a company called Federici Contracting. This was all part of a practice exercise (moot court) for law students to sharpen their legal argument skills, not a real case. Here's a simple explanation of the key points: 1) OSHA made a new rule requiring construction companies with over 100 employees to hire a personal protective equipment coordinator. 2) Federici Contracting sued OSHA, saying they didn't have the authority to make this rule. 3) The main questions the students were debating were: a) When a court finds that an agency (like OSHA) has made a rule that goes beyond its authority, does the law require the court to cancel (vacate) that rule completely? b) If the law does require courts to cancel such rules, is this requirement constitutional? Does it give courts more power than they should have under the Constitution?

[@dorcasadevu4469]

Very helpful

[@DrMaja9Urkel]

I did not understand a single word that came out of their mouths, but I loved it! Also, watching people getting cold-called is exhilarating!

[@reginayfavors]

Learning the law is a slow, thinking process. It is one of those things that when you read a case for the first time, you have to read it very slowly. Once you get the hang of it, then you can navigate between cases, etc.

[@learnenglish-vc7un]

whaaaaaaaaaat hats off, my anxiety would kill me , my legs would be dancing and my face would be burning besides my shaking hands

[@historyprofessor1985]

As a professor, it would be a great honor to have students as polished as these!

[@adamharrold407]

I dont know about me, but my friend who got 85% for mooting comp only got c plus for the same subject, soooooo, it depends

[@kaustubhraizada]

and in reality its different@@adamharrold407

[@sarcasticcf3553]

well polish them!

[@pulee1001]

Is it the Professor’s duty to polish the students?

[@sarcasticcf3553]

yes it is@@pulee1001

[@itsandrewdiego]

I'm so proud of all these people. The countless hours of hard work, preparation, thoughtful discourse and commitment to excellence are apparent across the board. Bravo.

[@Matt67012]

Too bad all legitimate firms will refuse to hire these disgusting antisemites

[@tehgamist7139]

I like that they interrupt so soon. Any idiot can recite a perfectly rehearsed speech, they actually have to think on their feet.

[@quehablo]

I mean, most actual appellate course judges will interrupt quite quickly. They've already read the brief, they want to get to questions quickly

[@prettyclassyladyOG]

No need to call them idiots

[@alyariel9713]

As someone who competed for the undergrad AMCA moot court competition, most people cannot recite a heavily complicated legal argument for 10+ minutes straight, especially with no notes. That's why it takes roughly 8+ months of preparation for competitions, it's challenging. Compared to interruptions, reciting is actually much harder and called a "dead bench" because of no interaction with the Justices. Time moves slowly and you need enough content to cover the allotted time you're given. Due to the amount of research you put in the cases supporting your argument, it's actually much easier to answer these questions off the cuff, and weave them into your argument roadmap. I'd like to see you try it sometime. 😄

[@LaSombraa]

These people definitely aren’t idiots….

[@jonesy_5498]

@@prettyclassyladyOGtheir whole point I think is that they’re not idiots, and them interrupting is showcasing that because the students can think quickly on their feet, therefore demonstrating real court readiness and prowess not just rehearsal.

[@haniyaya]

If I got interrupted after every sentence like that I'd probably lose my mind

[@anakinjmanu]

Especially when you are on a roll and then you have to backtrack or you lose your train of through so quickly.

[@dianacaa]

I'm sure they did that to make sure that these people don't recite a script, and that it's genuine

[@haniyaya]

@@anakinjmanu Exactly!

[@haniyaya]

@@dianacaa Yes but the interruptions were too frequent. When making an argument, that can really disrupt your rhythm and flow and make you forget your words or point

[@dianacaa]

@haniyaya ik that but I'm just saying

[@edmund8411]

Here for the vocabulary but as always I'M STUNNED by the brilliance.

[@insightjobwithmaryjey]

Hats off to all the speakers. You really did an amazing job. You made it as if it's not an intense conversation in front of the experts.

[@Matt67012]

Hats off to the Harvard bigots

[@stellamariefanboy.6768]

@@Matt67012it’s always that one person who has a problem with everything

[@PraveenKumar-kj8rq]

Thank you ♥

[@TessaBetke12]

This what I aspire to be. Im still in my undergraduate degree and Im taking a public speaking class in the fall and I'm tackling this class fangs and claws out, ambitious to get out of my shell so I can be a person like these people are!! I'm watching this as an inspiration to keep doing well to potentially get into Harvard Law. amazing work guys!

[@hydraulicfan3735]

You got this!! I'll be rooting for you in spirit!! 🫶

[@sarahb2004]

Good luck! I have taken many speaking classes and I did not go in with the gusto you have, so that’s why I’m still terrible at it. 😂You’ve got this!! ❤️

[@nathangillingham5734]

When Justice Sotomayor said "You will reach even greater heights than me" I feel like thats a bit hard considering... she's literally on the Supreme Court😅

[@NguyenNatri]

I think she meant the US President / Vice President, Chief Justice Supreme Court or House Speaker.

[@nateo200]

The Supreme Court is only the highest you can go if you don't explore other options :) The grass is always greener on the otherside I'm sure some of the Justices secretly wish they were doing something else.

[@joaom7554]

@@nateo200She could mean reaching Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

[@simplyeason]

where did she say that?

[@DrLivingParadox]

1:24:15 !! :)@@simplyeason

[@fakejohn928]

I love the composure and confidence of the students as they speak to these prominent legal figures

[@boxhitbox1455]

I love this. I have no idea what they are talking about but I find myself so engaged in this debate and the reactions of the students behind the people arguing their positions.

[@stellamariefanboy.6768]

I’m so glad I’m not the only one who doesn’t know what’s being said.

[@anasaqalovi6710]

Haha.....I just don't have any idea about what they are talking about...

[@jeremiahmathews1650]

Wow. The preparation from these students (both sides) really shows! It makes me excited about beginning law school soon.

[@KingOfThePirates101]

Tbh, I was never really interested in laws or politics until the Supreme Court overturned Roe V Wade. Since then, I've been listening to experts, judges, and people in this field. I'm thinking about going back to school to study law as well.

[@mariemarie1834]

​@@KingOfThePirates101are you in law school now? Going to law school is too expensive.

[@jeyprince9413]

Why is no one talking about Richard Dunn... That man is gonna go so far. Best oralist I've seen in any of the recent Ames Moot competitions!!

[@ram_bam]

I don't don't think that the lady who fainted and kept going can ever be topped.

[@TheNamesFarquaad]

Right!!!!!!

[@marh7124]

Just came from that video! Incredible stuff

[@FlorenceDjana]

Been studying law for 3 years now and this is the first time I’ve ever watched a mooting competition. I’m already nervous and I just started the video!

[@zeroz88]

You a 3L?

[@moonstruck7621]

I will be mooting in 3 days I'm in grade 10

[@FlorenceDjana]

@@moonstruck7621 omg good luck!!! You’re gonna ace it!!

[@moonstruck7621]

@@FlorenceDjana thank youu❤ I hope I do...I will remember to tell you the results

[@moonstruck7621]

@@FlorenceDjana we got semi finals

[@feersided]

if I was there I would probably have a panic attack 1 minute into my introductory speech. 😅

[@meXmydreams]

1 minute is probably too ambitious

[@imam-_-]

​@@meXmydreamstrue. The judges put them on their backfoot immediately after their introduction.

[@joecahill1994]

I would have tried to speak, but instead would have thrown up all over the microphone

[@venticoldbrewser5593]

Congratulations to both teams! I also enjoy getting exposure to more judges through these videos. I hope Judge Paul Oetken participates as a judge soon.

[@kailasv123]

Awesome and insightful moot. Got to learn so many things and amount of research both teams put in, is just awe inspiring. No wonder Harvard Law is class apart.

[@matej.m.rejsek8537]

I realize it's not an apples-to-apples comparison, but I can't help but remark on how reasonable, measured and in some cases compelling the people making these arguments are, in contrast to the lunacy that is modern day college debate.

[@muhammadfarhanzahidabdilla3217]

Finally we can watch Ames Moot Court Competition 2023 version!! Am so gladd

[@NapoleonBonaparte929]

What breaks my heart, is that, we humans can be so rational and logical and yet rationality is subdued in this cruel real world for self interests.

[@dominicmutiso1502]

I love your English! Learnt a few words. Are you an English native speaker?

[@user-bartox]

Life is hard , wear helmet

[@MB-gd6be]

Self - and self interests are the key words

[@wavesandisles]

@@user-bartox agree, but what they said is true though.

[@landsgevaer]

Humans rational and logical. That is funny.

[@ABCurry30]

I'm not even into law and I don't even understand any of these, but it's quite inspiring lol

[@muhammadsajjadali3172]

The judges are really tough!

[@can72287]

Its Harvard. A Harvard degree is well earned.

[@okorotimothy5133]

​@@g2828ccDo it if you can let's see

[@isaacjaimes6757]

38:35 AWWWW the little note he passes her and the fist bump she gives him, sooo cute !!

[@Quasar-dp4nt]

😂😂😂

[@sexychicilicous]

😍🥰☺️

[@machutdhieu3308]

Am a south sudanese citizen study law at starford International university, south Sudan, am so glad the amazing moot cote

[@JeremiahMendoza-u2x]

You are a great person to instruct to do and to get the right pursuit of justice ⚖️ thank you for your service

[@TxInfinity]

I can't help but think of the TV show "Suits" when watching Harvard Law students debate. My thought is that they will all go to Wall Street to become corporate lawyers.

[@ReAhWon]

first time observed this court, impressed and inspirational

[@tristangardner9103]

Gotta love a hot bench! The advocate handled this very well.

[@robioavion]

I am not a lawyer, I don't know why this was suggested to me, but DAMN Justice Liu.. that man is handsome!

[@bluestsea]

I don’t know why it came up in my feed, but that goes to show you that KZbin pushes want it wants to who it wants.

[@kastvam_koham]

Watching this with my thourough knowledge of Legal System (i only watched Suits)

[@atlrocafella]

😂😂same here.

[@tsmutylo]

Lol im with you

[@sofi465]

Same I’m very qualified in this field. (I watched Better Call Saul)

[@johannsebastianbach3411]

I guess I beat you guys. I watched them both. A couple times 😂😂

[@GreekLady188]

😂

[@DonYutuc]

Who's watching in 2024? If you are, consider yourself in the top 5% of the top legal KZbin audience because the algorithm sensed your attraction to a Supreme Court simulation "situation," such as this. Congratulations. 5 years from now, we could be watching a similarly orchestrated competition with the speakers beamed inside our office or wherever we're watching from. 4.5 million viewer's have made another Harvard Law School competition from 4 years ago, viral. Some of us watching this year will become Judges, Supreme Court justices and or in politics. Either way 💯 consider yourself chosen, in the realm of law. I rest my case. 😊

[@Subliminalmessage78]

I love anything legal! I also have a book of essential Supreme Court cases with summaries. I innately love numbers, but I love reading court transcripts and law books all day.

[@DonYutuc]

@@Subliminalmessage78Thank you. I can relate. I love numbers. Where can I get this book of Supreme Court cases?

[@KrysGrant-ey1xl]

I wanted to be a prosecutor and or a detective. 😢 I had so much promise just financially and mentally no support

[@DonYutuc]

@@KrysGrant-ey1xlKeep your hopes up, Krys! Life is sometimes full of surprises. As you think, you are.

[@takecareyourself12]

​@@Subliminalmessage78may you give me some recomendation supremacy of books law?

[@char3190]

I got anxiety watching this but I kept watching 😅

[@NYSkylark]

The teams are so good. Congrats to all.

[@tizamhango1114]

These students are brilliant.

[@khadisignatureghana]

This is beautiful to watch. Very educational

[@ajinkya5372]

👏👏👏👏 as a law student, this moot was great, full of knowledge, skilled & inspiring to me

[@DigitalChaos671]

due to the prosecutors allegation not having relevant evidence to support the accusation, my client remains innocent of this alleged crime.

[@roxannepedlar7763]

The Zone of Permissibility’ is actually a very specific type of area that sets up the rules by which the ‘injury suffered’ and the remedy that is to be applied can be measured.

[@mhbdcox]

This is a great discussion.

[@JeremiahMendoza-u5f]

I love this never will i forget this day live

[@jamimahkoarima4734]

Preparation is key, it shows that teams have prepared well.

[@josiahkrammes2185]

Very, very well done. Highly impressed. By saying what I'm about to, am I in no means putting down this great accomplishment and their talents; it's easier to prepare a brief and oral arguments when this is your only case to prepare. The true test is out in the real world when you have multiple cases on your desk. Multiple cases means multiple briefs and arguments to prepare all at the same time. It is much more challenging mentally, emotionally, and psychologically. Got to balance your time. Now, throw family into the mix; need I say more? Again, congratulations and best of luck!

[@d0ntreply]

i'm a cleaner by trade, but for some reason i come to watch this because watching very intelligent people in action is just very fascinating for a caveman like myself😁

[@klytus42]

Justice Liu is scrumptious. 😍

[@shelly5502]

What an amazing issue and great arguments!! What a pivotal conversation, especially after overturning Chevron

[@muhammadaamir-official]

Up to the mark...

[@Grace_lr]

This is so intimidating

[@jdewitte100]

Thanks, remembering too my own uniUtrecht/Aula-Debating 50yrs ago

[@roxannepedlar7763]

The application of the law is broad enough that it can cover the types of injuries that are suffered by the victims in this case 😮.

[@filmdorked]

Ahh my favorite video of the year is back

[@IzaacBwapapa]

Until I'm put subtitle on then I'm get this great discussion their English is very impressive and deep to understand..

[@n3m3g4y8]

I’d hire Dick Dunn just from that flow he’s got working up top. He has potential for some great slogans if he decides to start his own practice.

[@Blackhansdom]

this video is a history

[@BackwardReserve.]

I am speechless....

[@jothamdaledejesus2708]

I'm only a 1st year at law school looking to do moots in my second year. And God the grilling that the judges gave out was insane hahaha. Hope I cam do just as good as these guys.

[@roxannepedlar7763]

I think that Section 706 contains the language that references the word ‘set aside’ as meaning to enjoin or to vacate😮😅.

[@ellesher7990]

Can someone help explain the case at hand or is there another video about that?

[@zoeg5451]

they're really just saying words like i could never be a lawyer I'm such a bad bullshitter

[@TruthTALKA]

It’s not just words, it’s civil procedure and if you learn it in law school you know exactly what to say. Plus you prepare

[@mamaobama7132]

Just cause you don't understand the words doesn't mean it's bullshit 😭

[@zainabiftikhar5633]

​​​@@mamaobama7132 I think they meant there way of talking is bad lol ( idk of that made sense x.x )

[@jeremiahmendoza-u2h]

I love this memory

[@shimronnetia]

...love this very educational

[@LDTun]

To the first speaker, dont put your hand in your pocket when speaking to the judges hahaah

[@jeremiahmathews1650]

That student was actually my favorite oralist. I appreciate his slow and deliberate manner of speaking. He wasn't in a rush to get his point across but rather focused on making sure his points were understood and well placed

[@LDTun]

@@jeremiahmathews1650 I liked his tone too but sticking your hand in your pocket is a big nono

[@genesisshollins9326]

@@LDTunDo you mind me asking why? I’m not in the law field and am just genuinely curious lolol

[@fdfischer]

​@@genesisshollins9326 probably too causal

[@Susanviolet3322]

@@genesisshollins9326I think it’s more of a matter of respect . You speaking to well renowned judges so you shouldn’t have such a casual look with hands in pocket but I think he is doing it to calm his nerves since it is very scary being grilled

[@Watwatwat928]

Omg, l just graduated from middle, but l want to study for law from now on

[@lavenderxolemon]

I can’t wait to be a law student

[@israilborih7815]

Beautiful

[@davidwu3681]

The intelligence and poise of these lawyers to be are certainly impressive. Let's pray that they don't apply their extra-ordinary talents to evil causes like Josh Hawley, Elise Stepanik, Ted Cruz....

[@jakobvogel6764]

all of these students are far more intelligent than josh Hawley and ted cruz.

[@Susanviolet3322]

@@jakobvogel6764and hopefully they use it for good like David suggests. It’d be a shame if he turned out to be another Josh Hawley

[@HumanIntelligence]

great involvement guys cheers for future

[@v4l3ntuna]

watching harvard moot courts give me another level of motivation

[@SvetlanaAlliluyeva1]

Awesome

[@yuunyuun]

THIS WAS FUN TO WATCH!!

[@mariamyaka6363]

Great

[@JeremiahMendoza-u2x]

I love this

[@brentturno861]

Love it! ❤

[@roxannepedlar7763]

The definition of a ‘class action suit’ involves the following factors that affect all of the parties in the suit as being injured or harmed 😮😢.

[@PsaLm-h3e]

Is beautiful educational law in this ❤❤

[@ChrisWilliams-co4pt]

This was really intense!!😮‍💨

[@davidwu0667]

Monica wang is beautiful inside and outside , and she is the best student.

[@Chauhanvinefanclub]

Hey can you please tell me during the when the denial represent the petitioner put their hand in pocket before the Hon’ble Court is this right or not in America because in India this type of act insulting of the Court

[@sahutokeyho3534]

It's is not denial ,we called it plaintiff 😂

[@amberrobbymann9725]

His is cool, almost better than watching a law/court movie ❤

[@kabirsaha8330]

I guess the girl sitting to the left of the speaking guy is his friend, girlfriend or something cause see she's just soo happy to see him talking so firmly and smirks

[@JeremiahMendoza-u2x]

I'm proud of you all

[@roxannepedlar7763]

The question of whether the Appeals Court has jurisdiction to hear the case that is being presented before it is a good question to ponder 😂😢😮.

[@TOMCAT5.5149]

I order feterici pizza to remain open.

[@mohammadrumman8389]

Miss law

[@gregorysanders9034]

Good to see that the views are up

[@JeremiahMendoza-u5f]

You are what makes me

[@Bahirabae]

Watching this while doing revision on constitutional law 🤓

[@d-bosssavagestak3708]

In a scenario where an individual is repeatedly attacked and harassed on a nude beach, several legal actions and considerations could come into play. If the individual can prove harassment, injury, and negligence on the part of staff or the law enforcement involved, they may have grounds for various lawsuits. Here’s a breakdown of possible legal actions: ### 1. **Assault or Battery Claim** - **Definition**: Assault involves an intentional act that causes the victim to fear imminent harm, while battery involves actual physical contact. - **Lawsuit Basis**: If the individual is physically attacked, they may file a lawsuit against the attacker for damages resulting from the assault or battery. ### 2. **Negligence Claim** - **Definition**: Negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care to avoid causing injury to another person. - **Lawsuit Basis**: If the beach staff failed to ensure the safety of patrons or did not respond appropriately to incidents of harassment or assault, the individual could sue the staff/employer for negligence. ### 3. **Harassment Claim** - **Definition**: Harassment can involve any unwanted behavior that creates a hostile environment. - **Lawsuit Basis**: If harassment is persistent and forms a pattern of behavior that violates the individual's rights, they can pursue a civil harassment lawsuit. ### 4. **Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress** - **Definition**: This occurs when someone’s actions are so outrageous that they cause severe emotional distress to another person. - **Lawsuit Basis**: If the harassment and threats have caused significant emotional distress, a lawsuit can be brought forward for damages. ### 5. **Property Rights or Ownership Claims** - **Definition**: Ownership of a beach may vary based on local laws about public versus private property. - **Lawsuit Basis**: If the beach is private and you believe your rights were violated in a manner that detracts from your ability to enjoy your property, you could pursue legal claims against entities managing the beach. ### 6. **Respondeat Superior** - **Definition**: This legal doctrine holds employers responsible for the negligent actions of their employees performed within the course of their employment. - **Lawsuit Basis**: If employees of the beach (like staff or security) were negligent in preventing the attacks, the beach’s ownership or management could be held liable. ### 7. **Civil Rights Violations** - **Definition**: If law enforcement fails to protect the individual or responds inappropriately, it could lead to a claim for civil rights violations. - **Lawsuit Basis**: If law enforcement’s actions or inactions resulted in further harm or deny protection due to discrimination (e.g., based on nudity or other personal characteristics), a claim may be warranted. ### Summary While yes, an individual could potentially gain ownership rights concerning the situation outlined, asserting ownership based on harassment or injuries can be complex and depends heavily on local laws governing property and personal safety. The individual should consult with a legal professional who specializes in civil law or personal injury for personalized advice and to navigate the legal landscape effectively. It’s essential to gather substantial evidence (witness statements, medical reports, documentation of harassment, etc.) to support any claims in court. My friebd pipervfew other me harvard university boston mit type as well since kid librarys etc an other careers damon c j johnson cososton has sworn hand an all these charges will as do fit an other united laws as violations fit perfected to immediately take secure rughts of beach territory as well non hinderence on my behalfs an life guards otgrr whild nude renatjs to a serious figure no homosexual nore allow such acts upon such in no way shaoe or fir all fraud shopping around as well my setup evidences to lrive abything to try win an othervtrue facts life an death events as well ither illegal factirs if offucers willingbto challenge eye lie detector miami dade an wigjout illegal.setuos asknkwn to try already caught afyer as befire then ill givevup eye lie detectir as rest life guards or give full finances as ownership up will assure safer more fun revenue factors as well patrins secure safetys unlike million events etc sincerly Damon c,j,king,johnson coston 1984

[@opufy]

it really is like the movies you could watch those for practice

[@kaydub7396]

Lol u funny

[@KrysGrant-ey1xl]

It's recommended to me to watch! Im watching. I feel accomplished and bright even if my IQ is lower than theirs🤣🤣🤣

[@izzahyasminaiman9502]

im intrigued the moment they mentioned occupational safety and health, US OSHA, and department of labor cuz thats what my degree is for

[@pastormarciliodeusprovera]

I'm Brazilian, I admire the attitude of the American court judges, they certainly put on a show with their performances. The Brazilian court currently finds the situation regrettable. Hats off to the American court judges. I loved this video, great inspiration for me. Show.🥰🥰🥰

[@roxannepedlar7763]

The injunctive relief remedy that the Courts have as part of their authority to regulate the use of the’Vacater statutes mentioned in Section 706 and Section 703😂😮.

[@adiksadiatabs]

I'm sticking with HTGAWM