Andrew Wilson Listens to Rachel CRUSH the Do-Gooder Christian Feminist from X

[@rachel.wilson]

ANDREW BAD!

[@pchris6662]

You rock Rachel! Nicely done!

[@marcfilms999]

Love how you told the guy to go cry. You and Andrew are great with insulting dumb people.

[@BasedBazz]

💪💯🔥🙏

[@bjtucker5]

"Orange Man, bad Andrew, even worse"😆

[@jboy9995]

She got caught red handed, and still lying about it lol

[@_uncredited]

"My husband is upset" is a debate tactic worthy of Matt Dillahunty.

[@isaactelesco2141]

😂😂😂😂 Dude you just made my day!!!!!

[@Crimea_River]

Damn, this was good on multiple levels.

[@wilder11]

LMAO

[@DarkWing494]

Is that how you feel? Please show me when Matt has used that type of argument ever. I hate mindless woke idiots but they are still better than mindless religious idiots imo. BTW I think both Andrew and Rachel are very smart religious people and would love to see them go up against Matt in a debate but you obviously are not since you can't even insult using truth or facts.

[@wilder11]

@@DarkWing494 Uh...it was a joke bro. XD Also Andrew has already gone up against Matt Dillahunty. Matt Dillahunty quit the debate and ran away like a little bitch.

[@MommaHonu7]

“Well I’m here with MY authority over YOU to tell YOU that you have no authority over MY husband.”YES. Saying what all of us wives were thinking! 👏🏻

[@FunnyDougy]

This was PEAK Rachel. What a wife. Lucky duck.

[@leviathen151]

You can tell how proud Andrew is of his wife. This should be the goal for everyone

[@dragonfireideas]

He shouldn't be, tho.

[@artemkoropotkin3047]

​@@dragonfireideasCare to elaborate on that chief?

[@dragonfireideas]

@@artemkoropotkin3047 if insufferability was intelligence she'd be Einsteinesque. It isn't. And she's definitely no Einstein. 🤣🤣🤣

[@rachel.wilson]

@@dragonfireideas oh have you read any of my work?

[@dragonfireideas]

@@rachel.wilson unless your written work is vastly better than what I've seen from you here, I wouldn't waste the time. Go get mad someone baked a cake.

[@Learnme2play]

"My husband is upset" i cried laughing

[@Hook_88]

"Christian Feminist" no such thing, never existed, never will. John 8:44 and Revelations 2:9

[@Sentinel82]

How can Feminists follow Christ when they are too busy following Satan and Lilith? 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@sheepdog916]

Who claimed there’s such a thing?

[@eagle5818]

@@sheepdog916 feminists.

[@sheepdog916]

@@eagle5818 When? Nebulously, or in this video …given the video implies the woman identifies as a “christian feminist.”

[@AntiSewingCircleChristianity]

Facts

[@thomasdwyer7790]

Just when you think Andrew is a savage, here comes Rachel to mop the floor with the 304 christian feminists. Thank you Mr. and Mrs. Wilson

[@Jaryism]

Andrew mad: the debate will not go well for feminist Rachel mad: the debate will really REALLY not go well for feminist

[@shanenolan5625]

This woman is full of it she is boring . Her being a veteran or a nurse gives her zero credit with me

[@daemonsilver3304]

It removes credit. All women who serve terms as military, medical and/or first responders are bargain bin basket cases. Grab bags of psych disorders, and more maintenance than performance.

[@shanenolan5625]

@@daemonsilver3304 agreed and it's like a virtue signal, or attempt to. Establish authority, and veterinary implies she fought in war . People like diminish the military, ,she spent years in. The military an gets triggered by pg comments from a man , oh yes she was a serious soldier, sarcasm, jesus christ used more harsh language than Andrew Wilson, She is. Special place in her heart for of girls because she was likely a hoe herself, ( nurses have the highest infidelity rate , and they are known for promiscuity)

[@hughguys1183]

i bet u didnt know its actually also ex-xx worker too

[@StanlyTPT]

Being a vet & a nurse just proves she's a statist 304. Cheers

[@AnonymousJ0E404]

The one thing I expect a Christian woman to be is feminine, and a vet is not.

[@marcfilms999]

"He can go cry" Well I'm crying from laughing from the comment.

[@PatI-zg9gm]

That was hilarious, and he likely did.

[@WyattHype]

Fantastic ✔️

[@culturedbrother]

Typical Rachel, simply sweaping the floor with her opponent Wilson-Style. If she and Andrew were Mortal Kombat characters, they would win by default.

[@Mr-Host]

Someone should actually make a mod about andrew and rachel in mk LOL

[@brianborstein8456]

I feel like... I feel like... I feel like... I feel like...

[@AhFahted]

8:35 “we’re not in a position to be looking down on anyone” as she literally sneers down on Andrew with utter contempt and disdain from high atop her lofty, piety-signaling, Karen-made Protestant throne of holier-than-thou glory.

[@BearPawSwipe]

Rachel roasted them both into oblivion. This could have been an interesting discussion but that requires good faith and I love watching the religious battle it out.

[@owensbama1923]

What a bunch of woman prattle. I feel like. My concern is. Who made this autocorrect dummy the arbiter of how people speak. This was nothing more than tone policing. Period.

[@DrewsGotDrinks]

I like that the weasel whispering in her ear is not giving her autonomy in this argument and also blessed her with the ability to detect sin and judge others for their sin.

[@MALisBAD]

I’m concerned about the lack of Protestants telling 304’s the truth. 🤷‍♂️ 😂

[@ohcapt.mycapt]

Why would they? It’s their main demographic.

[@spellblade137]

Love you and your wife Andrew! And my name is Andrew too!! Lol but you've changed my family's life for the better 1000%

[@prodge888]

Hahaha “I don’t care how you guys feel!”

[@mrlacksoriginality4877]

I am not really a protestant but this whole men should be nice nice and tolerant is a really false interpretation of the bible. Just because we are to forgive doesn't mean those that have done transgressions against us shouldn't have worldly consequences. It is what Jesus meant by give to God what is God's and give to Ceasar what is Ceasar's. Jesus was also the least tolerant person on Earth, he told everyone their sin and made them repent by command. How is that any different to what Andrew is doing? TBH he isn't going far enough.

[@pchris6662]

Rachel rocks! For a woman who “knows her place”, I double dog dare any “enlightened woman” to cross swords with her! Andrew has a gem there and her kids are so lucky to have her.

[@ratillecebrasquedubitantiu4451]

I went in a rant to someone immediately after andrew mentioned tone police. Went jnto the hitory of the church and women in clergy bout how their psychology isnt conducive to the kind of role it requires. Then she comes in and validates every point i was making.

[@travisreifke4356]

She seemed somewhat reasonable until the feelings and the husband came into the argument.

[@Blacksweets]

‘I don’t care how you guys feel’ 😂👏 ‘He can go cry!’ 😂😂 Omg Rachel for the win! 🏆

[@OrthoLou]

The worst was how she still took ZERO accountability, and then had her simps and hags come on to help her gaslight the moderator WHO SHE CHOSE for being fair and unbiased.

[@TheNightshotBR]

You can see in his face how proud Andrew is of his wife. And yes, Andrew is the nicer one of the two.

[@guillermoelnino]

I feel this is in part because feminism allows womwn to be more ruthless.

[@mxwtubemxw]

BOOM! Excellent Rachel 🙂 100% Nailed it.

[@carlydavenport9638]

Thanks!just bought rachel’s book ,super excited to read it! Rachel,you are amazing

[@spiper5804]

Her husband sounds like he needs to learn how to control himself.

[@Bcaz223]

Love you Andrew and Rachel! Keep up the good work, DUBS all around.

[@omni0omega]

i wonder if they day will ever come when Andrew will be able to debate the daily wire guys

[@stevenmccormack6263]

I doubt that would happen, as much as I have enjoyed Andrew's content and admire his intelligence and ability to present an argument. The mocking superior laugh and insults will ensure that he won't be debating someone like Michael Knowles any time soon Imo.

[@ChrisGamerr]

@@stevenmccormack6263 He doesn't insult if his opponent argues in good faith, and Andrew, from what I can tell, doesn't laugh as a way to "mock" and "be above" someone but because the argument the opponent gives is fallacious/dumb.

[@TomFranklinX]

@@stevenmccormack6263 Andrew only starts shite if his opponent starts it first.

[@ifensler]

Nah, daily wire is too scared

[@greyspot00]

Her husband CURSING in the background tells you all you need to know about their household. She is the head of the household because he's a spiritual wimp.

[@indistinctchatter3501]

All i heard was "Waaah!"

[@johncoulombe6626]

for the algorithm, this is good Sith.

[@Effexlol]

No one takes 1 Timothy 2:12 out of context more than "Orthodox". I will say that ladies response to how badly Rachel took it out of context was beyond horrible too lol

[@Dfourteens]

Andrew, you already know this, you're a very lucky man. Rachel is a treasure of a woman.

[@augustuscaesar5997]

Andrew and Rachel, you are so lucky to have found each other..! 😊

[@mr.a_sa.5432]

Damn this was 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥!!!!! BASED RACHEL WILSON!!!

[@noelhine3794]

Well done Mrs Wilson...

[@erolbulut2584]

Mrs.

[@ruminating1596]

No clue how you two debate these types of people. They yap so much and say so little that I tune them out after awhile. You two do an amazing job listening and picking apart almost everything they say. I simply can’t remember half of it.

[@ReddAethelwulf]

Hey Andrew you should do a debate about the JQ!

[@masongreen1371]

I think he’s waiting until his argument is bulletproof.

[@gnosticacademy]

​@@masongreen1371 A bulletproof argument? You mean, the New Testament? Lol

[@masongreen1371]

@@gnosticacademy a lot of the debate will be about modern circumstances. It’s a very nuanced topic that can dive into anything and everything and sparks several related debates. If he goes in with a really bulletproof argument the way he does with everything else it could be very important to the collective consciousness. Or he doesn’t want to talk about them.

[@ReddAethelwulf]

@@gnosticacademy a lot of podcasters and debaters are scared of confronting it. I hope Andrew isn’t. I think he would do a a masterful job of debating it.

[@gnosticacademy]

​@ReddAethelwulf I know this very well. Considering Christ called (((them))) out all day long, and we are supposed to follow his lead, with no fear... to watch these weaklings say nothing says everything about their true adherence to the doctrine of Christ. They scared. They cowards. And it's pretty clear to see. Andrew would rather debate idiot whores on the whatever podcast than actually address the very group who is assisting and helping create those whores. Every dating app is run by the Chosen ones. But let's keep voting. Maybe Trump and his Israeli backers will shut down Only Fans! So. Unbelievably. Stipid.

[@888-tp7nz]

From the Didache: "We do not allow women to teach in the Churches, but only to pray and obey the priests. For this too our Lord Jesus Christ sent the twelve of us to teach the peoples and the nations and not women, although he could. If it was necessary for the women to teach first, He would order them to teach the people with us. If we don't allow women to teach, how will anyone allow them to become priests? If women were to be baptized, surely the Lord would be baptized by His own mother and not by John".

[@jamessteckel5379]

gotta give AC some credit, keeps getting wrecked then comes back for more...

[@dcfal817]

Love you guys!!

[@juanvaldez5422]

I honestly don’t think Andrew or Rachel really know much about scripture. I’m not taking aside because I don’t care . But , I don’t think they are scriptural versed at all . Which is very curious and brings up some interesting questions

[@jordanlindquist6605]

11:07 I laughed so hard at Andrew's face when he heard autocorrects husband talking to her.😂😂😂

[@WyattHype]

Short and Simple ✅ To the point 👍🏼 Racheal did fantastic with this.

[@TheWrathfulSlayer]

AutoCorrect?! More like AutoPolice!!😂😂😂😂

[@guillermoelnino]

Thats why ive turned mine pff since 2 020. Need to leet speak just to have an opinion.

[@jacquelinealexmatz]

I love Andrew and Rachel ❤

[@DebateColloseum]

Wow that was 100% dishonest. That is the thing you can lie on X but you can't lie about a recording. Rachel made good points. To be fair though Christ did come to serve. He was serving the Father. Christ routinely served others. He was also one of the best leaders of all time. Why? He showed that even leaders must serve. That nothing is beneath the foot of a leader. Even to the point of dying for his flock as he is the Good Shepard. Christ did not however excuse peoples sins. His claim of my wife is over your husband is just stupid nonsense.

[@ohhmiigoshh5826]

Man. I just posted a reply on Rachel's comment, and it's not there. I did use a "bad" word but misspelled it intentionally as if to censor it. Anyway. I also said in that message that thanks for all the great content.

[@julia_gib3300]

Rachel you are awesome! Keep doing what you’re doing.

[@elvis0609]

SHES AMAZING!! 😂😂😂😂

[@sincerehypocrite1402]

I was laughing at the time of the debate when Autocorrect got caught cheating but rewatching this clip, it never occurred to me how vile Autocorrect was by outright lying AND then to defend her lie in God's name by saying you are being "not christ like" by calling out the lie. These piety signaling prots are no better than the Pharisees, Autocorrect is truly underhanded and despicable, I hope she reflects back on this and repents.

[@coreylapinas1000]

this woman is based. She just straight up unloaded the gospel. Andrew needs to repent. Let somebody else troll the @Whatever podcast. Does he ever even give them the gospel? I haven't heard it! Might as well just have Andrew Tate on there to do the same thing.

[@M-L87]

I feel bad for the mod on this one the "good" Christians yelled at and gaslighted this poor guy to thinking he did a poor job, reality he did great it was autocorrect chick that broke all debate rules and cheated.

[@zacharyparker6940]

Cant find a place where Jesus insults a woman... Jesus told a woman who came to Him that He shouldnt share scraps from the table to dogs (her). Was it literal? No but Jesus did use shame and held himself above people to bring them to God.

[@Bruce4lmighty]

Autocorrect2.0 contradicted her own position many times in her opening statement! Leaders ask questions. Men lead. Men ask the questions. The end. EDIT: Atheists have more Bible knowledge than she does. Does she actually breathe? 11:00 Rachel demonstrating the 1,000 levels of difference between her and everyone else on the panel 😂😂😂 Ruined her opponent with a kill streak 😂😂😂

[@BearPawSwipe]

She is the quintessential cherry picked christian.

[@King0fAllPixels]

No one seems to get that Andrew is the NICE Wilson until its too late. Rachel is a credit to women.

[@markdatheist9179]

Rachel missed a golden opportunity to play the reverse uno card and start tone policing that rando lady's husband, since that woman's argument is that apparently that is a perfectly valid thing to do hahah

[@gerardgenesissantos7778]

Still tone policing. I am sick and tired of those people doing this. Because of your harsh truths, i learned a lot. I am not really good at debates you always say logic and truth. Please dont stop offending us! Kudos to you Rachel!

[@Maulhawk]

Being kind to others =/= loving others. It's called tough love.

[@shanenolan5625]

No authority

[@stuartbardin3164]

Andrews wife is phenomenal

[@si8086]

Rachel never fuckin misses. What a champ.

[@thundacracka77]

Andrew and Rachel are based AF. Love you guys.

[@brandonwinston8412]

Rachel is a GOAT!!!! Andrew is THE 🐐!!!!

[@kingsix2000]

Rachel handled that like *a boss*. Really fun to hear how they scuttle around when you make it clear that their feelings actually don't matter at all

[@gregorygant4242]

What kind of profile name is autocorrect anyway ? She doesn't even know who should be the leader in the relationship , it's like a 50/50 partnership for her and she keeps quoting scripture but doesn't even know what it really means she just says what she wants it to mean for herself !

[@slero5a]

Andrew BAD! Rachel Good! Hahahahaha great one here!

[@HasidicKaiju]

May God have mercy on anyone under her care as a nurse.

[@TheHangedMan]

Hell yeah, your wife is amazing dude, congrats

[@dragonfireideas]

🙄🙄🙄

[@vitasvitas7129]

That husband sounds like he has a brain. 😂😂😂

[@bryanmartinez7859]

She ate

[@noonefromnowhere99]

You called her tactics out nearly word for word and she literally did everything you said.

[@dragonfireideas]

Wilson is being a complete buffoon.

[@ArtOfDying]

amazing! i never laughed so hard! rachel shredded that loser -T

[@SmallBusinessStartup]

Who's not gonna sleep after this lol.

[@geoffreyfield6686]

I feel, I feel, I feel. Nuff said.

[@OdioSuprema]

I have a “concern” 🤣🤦🏻‍♀️

[@lucif3erum]

The dreaded and legendary. Hell yeah

[@edizzle62]

That is by far the funniest thing ever.

[@markdatheist9179]

That was amazing

[@donhill1825]

We need a "Tone Police" drop to the tune of "Turn Me Loose" by Loverboy. Andrew's approach has won more souls for Christ in a few months than the pearl-clutchers will achieve in a lifetime.

[@HiImGrymey]

Wachel Wilson.

[@terrordude11]

There are a lot of "I feel" statements going on, and there is not a lot of evidence for her claims (if any, apart from her feelings). Also, she must be quoting from the book of the council of nicea when she says, "christians have authority over others who are saying dumb sh*t over the internet" 😂

[@erolbulut2584]

Amazing how some broads can prattle on incessantly without saying anything.

[@scriptur3sgaming132]

Do a debate with Hassan piker

[@bigzachful]

I thought he already did? Or was that Andrew Tate. I can’t remember.

[@Geradtheichigoslayer]

​@@bigzachfulye Andrew tate

[@ez3700]

Whose that? I wonder if little old me could manage that no name.

[@johneaston8314]

Hassan would never debate Andrew 😂

[@ez3700]

Hold on. He's obviously someone's hero. Perhaps we should hear him out.

[@JoeyDieselComedy]

Being a Veteran(Infantryman in the Army) I find it funny when I see POGs like Marcy getting pissy over Tone Policing. Because your tone is just normal conversation level to me based on the experience standard. Granted Marcy probably got the Kid Glove treatment while in.

[@prowlagen]

Evening Andrew

[@SomeguyOnline]

AutoCorrect2.0? More like AutoCheater1.0!

[@TheCreativeAnimation]

Andrew is prideful i think that's not even up for debate lol they took the L. The woman: calling them out with the bible and trying to talk about the truth. Rachel: you are a woman so we wont listen to you.

[@donhill1825]

Tying yourself into a pretzel by mapping 2024 egalitarian nonsense onto cherry-picked, out of context scripture is "calling someone out." (Whatever that actually means) If you look up "internal critique" it might give you insight into what Rachel was doing. You'll figure it out. I have faith in you.

[@TheCreativeAnimation]

@@donhill1825 do you realize that the only one talking about egalitarianism is rachel? and she's using it as a tool to say that the woman's opinion is not valuable because she's a woman. its a cheap trick to avoid the conversation, its a non starter. having an authority does not make you infallible and doesn't mean you cant be critiqued by someone who doesn't have authority.

[@PatI-zg9gm]

@@TheCreativeAnimationThe problem with that is the critique isn’t valid. We could go back and forth forever, kvetching about tone, delivery, and “just be nice”. It is irrelevant to the “message”. Nothing is gained by handling sex work with kids gloves. Those women hear that, nod, giggle, and go right back to the behavior. Providing vehement condemnation is not only done to get these degenerates to see the errors of their way. It is done to also dissuade other young women from that path. It can not be tolerated, at all, and if that hurts their feelings, or yours, so be it.

[@billbradley4878]

@@TheCreativeAnimation Being defensive against intentionally naive disingenuous interloceturs is a prefectly reasonable position to take. In general the Wilsons only give out the same kind of energy they receieve. Rachael was combative because the other woman had already been combative with her husband, the interaction was adversarial before it started based on prior history. In general Andrew only gets snarky when the other side starts making snide remarks. Sure no one is perfect but in general.

[@TheCreativeAnimation]

@@billbradley4878 it doesnt matter if the woman had already been combative against her husband. when she came into the conversation, she seemed very good faith and trying to have a constructive conversation. but rachel was only there to shut down that conversation. and Yeah thats the point. i like a lot of what andrew says but hes not perfect. and pointing out important flaws on them is viewed as a heresy apparently

[@seanflynn7867]

Rachel is a spit fire😂

[@casperswift]

I feel i feel i feel, this chick feels alot but says very little prattle prattle prattle. Andrew your awesome keep it up..

[@nickpetrossi2008]

Holy crap. What a manuvere! Rachel saw the opening, latched down, and refused to let go. Anything that lady said after beimg caught didnt matter unless Rachel acknowledged it, which she didnt. That was neat to watch.

[@NoseNaris]

Aren’t woman not suppose to discuss scripture? Or is it just to be priestess? Cuz if so, isn’t this just all mute to begin with? Honest question I just want to understand better.

[@Mr-Host]

There is no such thing as priestess. That woukd be heresy, this was not a scriptural debate. It was supposed to be rachel trying to understand why auto thinks she has the right to correct andrew. And she doesnt. AUTO made it about scripture, even then women are allowed to talk about scripture but only to eachother.

[@Enonymous99]

Most people have different opinions on this but this is the best way of understanding it A woman’s opinion is not only valued but in fact it is welcomed, especially for other women and children to hear, their voice is very important in the community and in the church However a woman is not permitted to have their own ministry, they are also not permitted to priests of pastor, they are not permitted to hold authority inside any church or ministry This is not to say woman cannot be prophets, give wisdom and teaching, schedule or coordinate things inside a church etc… if they are gifted, their gift should be utilized freely onto all of our Christian sisters and brothers, it just has to be done under the authority of a man inside that community, ministry or church This idea that woman should never speak ever is a misunderstanding of the scripture, the father loves his daughters just as Much as his sons, they just have different roles in a ministry, but to say a woman has no voice inside of a church, would mean that a woman has no place in ministry And that is not the case Men are to lead, women are to follow Men are to protect, women are to support Here’s an example If a woman inside a church has matronly wisdom to give the other women who don’t know of her wisdom, it wouldn’t be very supportive to deny those women that wisdom that the wise woman has Under the guise of “woman can’t speak in church”

[@Kiwonfu]

​@@Enonymous99 Rachel said a woman cannot correct Andrew on the Bible because men are above women

[@bobderpenstein6117]

Jesus would have been labeled an "anti-semite" for calling Jews the sons of the devil and vipers. He wasnt very nice to some...

[@2AJames]

It's almost poetic. Andrew, in a different room, streaming to a different audience, while his wife takes on this debate completely and demonstrably on her own, watching in real time as Rachel catches this broad and her husband cheating. It's hilarious.

[@alexandralemoineatuesta9224]

So embarrassing, 😅😂😂😂😂😂