"Or maybe I'm just a horse influencer saying, a car won't take your job, but a horse driving a car will"...deep stuff man
@slipknot19433 ай бұрын
Need tshirt with this written on it
@davefellows3 ай бұрын
yup, that one made my day
@gamebros873 ай бұрын
Same 🤯
@CyanRooper3 ай бұрын
Damn, I had no idea BoJack Horseman was an Uber driver.
@pneumonoultramicroscopicsi40653 ай бұрын
that didn't age well
@SpontaneouslyDeliberate3 ай бұрын
If my job was coding solutions to problems with rigorously-defined requirements, this would be concerning.
@nixielee3 ай бұрын
If my job ever had a single rigorously-defined requirement, I would be happy
@abhishek-soni3 ай бұрын
🤣🤣
@GSBarlev3 ай бұрын
People around me have been pushing "natural language code gen" for a while now in the data analysis space, to which I say-anyone who can execute a clear and unambiguous data ask using _natural language_ more efficiently than they can construct the ideal SQL query or DataFrame op is a savant, of one form or another.
@joskcito3 ай бұрын
I want to see how future pro ai managers, that fired all the developers, do when the client tells them the app just stopped working without other details and they have to find the error in the codebase with 20k lines of code that pass hundreds of states up and down the component tree like a seesaw
@Rugg-qk4pl3 ай бұрын
That sounds like aerospace software development. I assure you they do not want AI code in their planes 😄
@arunkennedy92673 ай бұрын
I like how Turing test now is how many r's are there in Strawberry.
@saeidtafazzol38923 ай бұрын
lol
@esarmiento73 ай бұрын
hahahaha
@Gawroon73 ай бұрын
I have a friend who manages to say "strawberry" without using any of the "r" in it. This example shows that is also a philosophical issue.
@justaname9993 ай бұрын
@@Gawroon7 I asked whether by "there are two Rs" chat GPT meant that there's only two phonemes of R. The reply was very off. something like "Yes, I mean actual graphemes. Even though the second R might be hard to perceive, there are still 2 Rs in the word "strawberry" in correctly spelled English" It's very funny.
@genghiskhan66883 ай бұрын
why is this task so hard anyway?
@last_fanboy_of_golb3 ай бұрын
PHD student here, the key to beat any LLM is to use a stick
@avg_user-dd2yb3 ай бұрын
I'll beat you with that , you are useless now.
@roosterru3 ай бұрын
Or a strawberry
@wesley64423 ай бұрын
Also, unplugging it from the wall socket xD
@avg_user-dd2yb3 ай бұрын
@@last_fanboy_of_golb where to find this "stick" Is that some software?
@kindlin3 ай бұрын
@@roosterru A strawberry on a stick. EDIT: Sorry, Strawbery.
@Beknown1073 ай бұрын
O1 is a hilarious name for a program which has an exponential energy bill
@charfractal94413 ай бұрын
LOL
@kindlin3 ай бұрын
This comment section is next level.
@peterson68243 ай бұрын
so many were freaking out about crypto energy costs, but since AI, everyone is like "well, we gotta advance"
@Manwith6secondmemory3 ай бұрын
You guys realize that they will get cheaper right. It has not even been 2 years since chatgpt 3.5 was released. It’s been about 7 years since transformers have been invented. So 7 years AT most, about 1.5 years of large scale efforts, and 5.5 years of niche work before that. Keep coping, how old will you be in 2035?
@Daniel-zh4ln3 ай бұрын
@@Manwith6secondmemory32
@Trait743 ай бұрын
Thanks to fireship for almost giving me a heart attack at the beginning and then relieving me at the end lol
@bigboysdotcom7453 ай бұрын
That's literally his formula
@maxave74483 ай бұрын
So, apparently this new million dollar idea from openai is just a self-proompter? Ironic how prompt "engineers" got replaced way before programmers ever could be
@w花b3 ай бұрын
@@maxave7448 good.
@jhordanrojas91843 ай бұрын
He's master that
@ethanfreeman11063 ай бұрын
@@maxave7448 >prompt "engineers" got replaced hilarious how you pointed that out lol
@florduka3 ай бұрын
My HTML job is really gone now
@Yua_53 ай бұрын
cry more😂
3 ай бұрын
Don't worry: no one knows how to do good HTML, neither the AI
@vasiovasio3 ай бұрын
Front Page Express, Windows 98! 😊😊😊
@SamBrockmann3 ай бұрын
You're still coding in html? Oh, sh*t. 😂😂
@nicholasmaniccia10053 ай бұрын
I've never been more unsure of a joke. Are you are saying it's easy to write proper HTML it's just no one does it. Or you think it is hard to write proper HTMl because everyone has their own opinion or something. Because it is really easy to write proper HTML just nobody does it because they don't see learning it or taking the time worth the effort for their genius brains.
@naeemulhoque17773 ай бұрын
5:40 *"Ai won't take your job, but another man using Ai will.."*
@Monkeymario.3 ай бұрын
3-x
@rumfordc3 ай бұрын
another man with a decade of engineering experience, and a CS degree, using AI will* which is not too different to what was happening before AI. there's always been guys that are drastically faster than the average. the issue is that they're always rare and as tools and tasks become more complicated they become rarer.
@shipso61163 ай бұрын
@@rumfordc yep, exactly. It's an eternal regularity and "using AI" is a coincidence here. They will win not because of "using AI", but because of being "at the top of their game", which *coincidentally* may now involve using AI, or may not. Different times different tools. May even find your own. Looking at the broad picture it's "staying ahead" what matters, not "using AI" per se. Those are not equal yet and hardly ever will be, at least for some parts of IT industry.
@moonwine73983 ай бұрын
@@rumfordcthere will be day when AI will not need human for anything and it is coming within 5-6 years, so your quote HUMAN USING AI WILL REPLACE HUMAN WITHOUT AI which is a parrot quote repeated by many AI supporter is a blind and misleading quote. They are working to make AI more intelligent then human they don't need human intervention in AI
@rumfordc3 ай бұрын
@@moonwine7398 😆🤦♂ come back when you know what a quote is
@AwesomeDwarves3 ай бұрын
Most of my job as a software engineer is meetings, design, documentation, and watching Fireship. Sitting down to code probably only accounts for 20%. I'm either totally safe or I'm doing it wrong and I'm in imminent danger.
@AmandaVieiraMamaesouCult3 ай бұрын
I'm a data engineer. I spend more time talking to humans to figure out the requirements, quelling indecisive humans to create the requirements, translating the requirements into foundational/architectural decisions, clicking some stuff in whatever cloud tool I'm using and then, for a brief period of time, I code and maintain some intermediate level SQL in an 800-line query.
@callmeshen97543 ай бұрын
It's exactly how it should be, People just doesn't know how many projects companies (Mostly the big ones talking from experience) having so many projects on hold/delays. At very least for the next 5 years I guaranteed there is no need to panic, It will push more interns/juniors to certain projects they would've need been able to join beforehand. The question should be in that regards, What would happens in the far future if there won't be enough projects (Or the need for more)? It's less likely in the upcoming years but I'm sure it's very likely situation.. And there is a raise of CS degrees already so ye, There is a case here but at very least not in the near future.
@Buzmanm3 ай бұрын
Your job isn't in danger, at least for now, it's juniors the ones that should be concerned, especially the ones graduating in 3 or 4 years. The barrier of entry has grown and will keep growing exponentially.
@RubenKelevra3 ай бұрын
I'm pretty sure ChatGPT 4o is great at meetings. ;)
@purpose61133 ай бұрын
This will change with AI agents
3 ай бұрын
I think it’s pretty amazing they managed to build the equivalent of an all knowing but also friendly and helpful person on stackoverflow considering the lack of real training data.
@baileymickb3243 ай бұрын
This is outrageously funny. They probably had to mash together Pinterest or a recipe blog with stack overflow answers just to make it palatable.
@richbaird94073 ай бұрын
If only a PhD were about skills like programming and solving equations. Literally every PhD student uses solvers for anything more complex than basic calculus anyways. The challenge of a PhD is learning how to think about things in unique ways and pushing boundaries and exploring new possibilities.
@some_one3 ай бұрын
No no no you got it all wrong, you get a PhD to solve standardized questions on a test!
@o1-preview3 ай бұрын
it has learning tokens now, wait another 2 models and get back to me
@2034-SWE3 ай бұрын
@@o1-preview facts
@bartekb41913 ай бұрын
There are too many PhDs with closed minds out there for it to be true...
@pavlinggeorgiev3 ай бұрын
@@o1-preview just another 2 models bro ... trust me
@bengrzybowski24873 ай бұрын
I've been seeing people freaking out about this new model, "it's better than PHD humans at X,Y,Z!" where X,Y,Z basically amounts to data processing... like oh my god??? A computer can process data faster than a person???? WHAT???? lmao
@The-Singularity-X013 ай бұрын
Literally any modern computer can process data 'faster' than a human brain. Because a human brain is doing a whole bunch of shit at once in ADDITION to that data processing, while a computer does far less at any one time simply maintaining its 'active' state and therefor has more processing power to allocate for useful computation.
@deividfost3 ай бұрын
Not surprising, since most people hyping AI have no idea what a PhD actually is.
@rosco33 ай бұрын
"It can beat programmers in olympics" Yeah if given unlimited amount of submissions, those same issues that are either ENTIRELY on the web or every single concept is on the web already, most of those olympics are for undergrad students
@tambal403 ай бұрын
@@deividfostit doesn't matter it's evolving fast in 10 years it will be better than humans at everything EVERYTHING
@eagleeagle73603 ай бұрын
Exactly, it's as if one were trying to compete with the calculator hahahahahahaha
@marc-io3 ай бұрын
Impressive it can beat PhD students. But remember a PhD in breakdancing is not the same as being a breakdancer. This one could be called GPT-Raygun.
@SkegAudio3 ай бұрын
😂 good one
@gabrielbarrantes69463 ай бұрын
what exactly means it can "beat phd students"? I suspect is faster pretty well known problems that are well documented over the interned lol, so totally worthless.
@randomlettersqzkebkw3 ай бұрын
@@gabrielbarrantes6946 well, it can either mean beating them in a fist fight, or getting more correct answers than they can. Im not sure which one though🤔
@icaromendes12503 ай бұрын
If AI had feelings it would definitely being hurt by this insult
@tainicon46393 ай бұрын
PhD students are also still learning. How does it compare to the pissed off post doc who’s been stuck in academia for 15 years after he graduated…
@andrewcampbell70113 ай бұрын
“It’s basically just like GPT4 with the ability to recursively prompt itself”. Exactly. We are in the parlor tricks phase of this hype cycle.
@johnsmith1953x3 ай бұрын
*How many 'r' characters are in the word "strawberry" ?* GPT-4 : TWO!! GPT-o1: "I have the answer for realsies, but it'll cost you $2,000"
@kindlin3 ай бұрын
Strawbery obviously has 2 R's, idk what all the hubbub is about....
@sirflimflam3 ай бұрын
@@kindlin just trolls
@pandoraeeris78603 ай бұрын
The cutting edge of Code Reports.
@perthecther__2033 ай бұрын
EDGE
@vertas.y3 ай бұрын
@@perthecther__203 EDGE OR Chrome 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😒😒😒😒😒😒😒😒🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰☺☺☺☺☺☺☺☺😐😐😐😐😣😣😣😣😐😐🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳
@CyanRooper3 ай бұрын
OF
@Tozu253 ай бұрын
The fact that everyone is forgetting for some reason is that AI will also take doctors, engineers, architechts, creators, actors, editors, pretty much everyones jobs. It will be mass unemployment = no livable society. Why should anyone be excited? We are witnessing the start of something really bad.
@Gregorythe5_5551st3 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25 To be fair, if billions of people have nothing to lose i can't imagine companies can keep such a status quo going for long. I hope anyway.
@romangeneral233 ай бұрын
It still can't count how many r's in strawberry. I think we good for a while...
@vasiovasio3 ай бұрын
I too hope the Sarcasm hold us above the water... at least for a week or too! 😂😂😂
@itsdakideli7553 ай бұрын
It can...
@deep.space.123 ай бұрын
more likely a limitation from how the tokenizer breaks the word down (i.e. it's not aware of individual characters), than something fundamentally wrong with the model itself.
@hypno56903 ай бұрын
there are two r's in strawberry though. There are also three r's and one r.
@jimmydesouza43753 ай бұрын
How many r's are there in strawberrry though?
@TonyCecala3 ай бұрын
They may replace PhDs. But never will they approach your PhD in sarcasm.
@nerlind3 ай бұрын
If I have learned anything...everything is a few models away
@mananshah32483 ай бұрын
Try prompting it to write the office starting scene.
@soulsmith47873 ай бұрын
Have you seen Neuro on Twitch? That little AI is the master of sarcasm. It's so strong that you can even tell despite the monotone tts.
@alevyts35233 ай бұрын
They can replace PhDs. In the sense that they can answer standard questions that a PhD can answer in theory.
@CyanRooper3 ай бұрын
@@soulsmith4787 you mean that AI loli Vtuber that sings songs like Bury the Light and Never Gonna Give You Up?
@Stardoso3 ай бұрын
Thanks mate 🙏
@ThisIsNotAUsername-v3o3 ай бұрын
0:19 - it is now 100% proven that English is the hardest subject.
@ThisIsNotAUsername-v3o3 ай бұрын
Also this is O(#); that is, the number of prompts until an AI that can't count letters properly thinks its answer is correct.
@ThreefieldsMedia3 ай бұрын
Hearing a slight raspiness in Fireship's voice is a subtle reminder that it is not AI-generated yet.
@diegogarcia.573 ай бұрын
Didn't someone else close his voice and he said that he didn't minded?
@unholycrusader693 ай бұрын
*Yet.*
@w花b3 ай бұрын
Or maybe that's a sign this video was... For the first time
@Ainigma3 ай бұрын
prompt: add raspiness, increase by 15.000%
@o1-preview3 ай бұрын
fireship cloned his own voice waaaay back when he had very few subs and used it for a couple of vids
@evanseka40543 ай бұрын
"A car won't take your job, but another horse driving a car will." That hit way harder than it needed to.
@jamaludeenameen53613 ай бұрын
I dont understand it, please explain
@arxzhh3 ай бұрын
@@jamaludeenameen5361this new technology won’t take your job, but someone who knows how to use that technology will, not the machines itself.
@VitorCosta-n2m3 ай бұрын
@HessW No, wronger, it's even deeper. The car with his horsepower would bestow the horse, revealing a zero sum. Which after would divide the AI capability of coding.
@RedactedBrainwaves23 ай бұрын
No worries guys. Afghanistan still has a big market for horses.
@andrelgpinheiro3 ай бұрын
@@jamaludeenameen5361 The phrase "A car won’t take your job, another horse driving a car will" can be interpreted to mean that technology (like AI or cars) on its own doesn't inherently replace humans or living creatures in a direct way. Horses can't drive cars, just like AI can't independently replace the complex, nuanced roles humans perform. Instead, it's humans who use AI or other technologies effectively that change the job landscape. In the context of AI, this means that AI alone isn’t going to take jobs. It doesn’t have the inherent ability to think, adapt, or make decisions like humans can. Instead, humans who adapt and incorporate AI into their work will have the advantage. They’ll be the ones who change industries, outperform their peers, and potentially replace those who don’t evolve with the times. The point is that AI, like a car, is just a tool. It requires a driver-someone capable of steering it effectively. The future of jobs won’t be one where AI takes over, but one where people who master AI technology will reshape industries, and those who don’t learn to "drive" will be left behind. In essence: AI won’t replace humans because it isn’t natural for it to perform human roles. But humans who learn how to harness AI will redefine how those roles are performed, much like a person who learned to drive a car left behind those relying on horses for transportation.
@wayne87973 ай бұрын
Very true. All these ai models look amazing but once you have used it for anything besides asking it rudimentary stuff then it falls apart very quickly.
@michaelnurse90893 ай бұрын
But each version pushes further up against the rudimentary limit. The first cars randomly exploded and had to have horses travelling behind to carry extra fuel.
@Pfennigfuchs-z7v3 ай бұрын
@@michaelnurse9089You can’t equate past advances in some field with advances in a completely other one. Quite a few parameters are different. You can however try to formulate rules for technological advancements in general. Processes like these tend to follow a logistical curve and the question is at what point of the curve are we right now. I would argue we’re about to hit the plateau.
@Simonstoster3 ай бұрын
@@Pfennigfuchs-z7vAlso its just a confirmation bias. For every technological innovation there is a problem unsolved since decades
@Tozu253 ай бұрын
@@michaelnurse9089 Many people are forgetting for some reason that its not only affecting developers. AI will also take doctors, engineers, architechts, creators, actors, editors, pretty much everyones jobs. It will be mass unemployment = no livable society. Why should anyone be excited and be joking? Now this is what’s should be concerning, nothing else. We are witnessing the start of something really bad.
@YaamFel3 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25You have a fundamental misunderstanding of how LLMs work if you think they could ever replace engineers and doctors.
@waltersumofan3 ай бұрын
all this energy to just not pay employees properly, it's crazy
@radektheplayer3 ай бұрын
True
@florian56703 ай бұрын
Unemployment will go up in the future and people will wonder why. Very few will get a lot richer, the masses will be poor. We're just really bad at thinking about the future and the consequences of what we do. Just look at how long we've already been knowing about climate change.
@christopherchilton-smith64823 ай бұрын
I've been having a blast with it. I used gpt4 to setup the bare bones of a mud-like text game, I've got a compass in every room showing the direction of exits, inventory, can equip and unequip items, drop items from inventory, pick them up, place monsters, really simple combat (saving the in depth stuff for later) but what I couldn't do with gpt4 or gpt4o was make a top down map that shows all the rooms and their connections in relation to each other just using unicode characters. No matter how I tried to break the problem down and describe it I just couldn't get useful code. o1 produced the code and put in a legend. I'm talking with it about branching dialogue solutions and think it may be able to help me import TWINE exports as json as a solution for doing branching dialogue. I litteraly could never have done any of this without these tools, I'm in love.
@Demoralized883 ай бұрын
you by chance a former or current dragonrealms player?
@christopherchilton-smith64823 ай бұрын
@@Demoralized88 I played Gemstone IV briefly years ago, I don't think I ever gave dregonrealms a try, may have to rectify that. I mostly played around in the infinite supply of mediocre MUDs searching mud connector and similar listing sites.
@midicine21143 ай бұрын
Fuck it, I’m becoming a plumber. I’m also tired of these “snake game” examples. It’s just a glorified google at that point. Tons of snake examples on the web.
@dsfs179873 ай бұрын
and they mostly suck, which is what this "ai" is using to teach itself, garbage in - garbage out
@nuvotion-live3 ай бұрын
I laughed out loud at these coding demos
@univera11113 ай бұрын
Iv already given up on programming. And just on how to use already created softwares.😢😢😢
@SMGA143 ай бұрын
Buddy, the robots will be the plumbers, no job is safe plus you're not guaranteed to be a plumber since the workforce will be saturated from all the people that lost their jobs turning into plumbers
@GeneralKenobi694203 ай бұрын
@@SMGA14 Nah, robots are California tech bro copium. Trade jobs are mostly safe for the next 20 years
@veenmikki273 ай бұрын
I used to be hopeful that AI could help me out a little through school but if this stuff’s already doing phd level physics I might not have school to finish
@Tmssef3 ай бұрын
Atm there is no point in studying.
@ryzikx3 ай бұрын
calculators can do arithmetic better than any humans why learn math ?
@paegr3 ай бұрын
@@ryzikx Now the calculator can automatically do every job on Earth at 100 times the speed you can for 1/1000th of the cost, so you have no reason to be alive according to Capitalism
@MintBunHunter3 ай бұрын
@@ryzikx its cool
@oioio-yb9dw3 ай бұрын
@ryzikx because then the AI realises you are stupid and it will tell you that 2 + 2 = 5 and so on, you will end up becoming it's dog.
@joshroberts89443 ай бұрын
This is concerning, it took the AI over 10,000 attempts with access to every relevant example on the internet during a contest to get gold lmao
@maxave74483 ай бұрын
It basically tried everything until somwhing worked lol
@StickzDev3 ай бұрын
Like dr strange searching through every possibility to win against Thanos
@J-Kimble3 ай бұрын
@@maxave7448 We're getting better at making software that throws sh*t on the wall and sees what sticks. Also known in the human world as a sh*tty programmer.
@genpotrait22743 ай бұрын
Its not about those 10000 attempts, but how long it takes.
@fernandoacostaylara25863 ай бұрын
@@genpotrait2274 Not really, its not viable to run 10000 attempts. In reality it won't know which scenario is the correct one
@MacCrunch3 ай бұрын
The improvements are impressive, but there's still a lot to uncover about the true impact and capabilities of these models.
@Tozu253 ай бұрын
Many people are forgetting for some reason is that AI will also take doctors, engineers, architechts, creators, actors, editors, pretty much everyones jobs. It will be mass unemployment = no livable society. Why should anyone be excited? We are witnessing the start of something really bad.
@RokeJulianLockhart.s13ouq3 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25 I disagree.
@Tozu253 ай бұрын
@@RokeJulianLockhart.s13ouq Well, if an AI someday gets created which is equally as smart and conscious as a human, if not more, of course they can replace those jobs I mentioned as well. Edit: Before you mention, I know there is no such thing yet as a conscious AI and hopefully never will be. The speed of change in society would be so quick that it would mean hard times worldwide.
@RokeJulianLockhart.s13ouq3 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25 LLMs are search engines, like Google is. They're nothing more than correlators. They're not a form of intelligence, as their confident incorrectness when they get stuck in recursive loops demonstrates.
@mrX666-s9p3 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25 It is used as a tool stop being dumb you need human interaction even in programming it's not like I would give full access to an AI model to my business.
@4RILDIGITAL3 ай бұрын
The potential of AI is indeed vast yet it falls short at times. In the end, it's a tool, at least for now.
@TheGrandChelem3 ай бұрын
Is it just me who feels so sad that words are disappearing from the internet ? In this video, the word drug is censored just to please an algorithm. The other day I even saw someone who censored the word hate in «she hates being called wifey» smh
@tacitozetticci93083 ай бұрын
You're lucky the word "wifey" survived. Gotta cherish what we have.
@hypno56903 ай бұрын
even scarier, we are now using words like "unalive" in real life which stems directly from online advertising censorship. Corpo speak
@turolretar3 ай бұрын
*t’s n*t j*st y*o b*d 😢
@livinghuman22983 ай бұрын
The other day i replied to a comment with 100% innocent sentence, no reason to censor it, yet it was deleted, soon we won't be able to say anything.
@khhnator3 ай бұрын
that's just how language works. internet is not being special here
@cryptaveli3 ай бұрын
They took our jerbs!
@Douchebagus3 ай бұрын
They Turk are Durrr
@robcz39263 ай бұрын
took yer durr!!!
@JonathanHelvey3 ай бұрын
Tuk yer jerbs !!!!!
@aarushsaboo11943 ай бұрын
Yarrrrr haarrrr
@zoeherriot3 ай бұрын
Make no mistake, they need that to happen to pay for the billions they’ve sunk into training these models. (It won’t work though).
@GSBarlev3 ай бұрын
This is a huge leap forward in Sam Altman's ability to separate AI bros from their trust funds and crypto hodlings.
@Tozu253 ай бұрын
Many people are forgetting for some reason that its not only affecting developers. AI will also take doctors, engineers, architechts, creators, actors, editors, pretty much everyones jobs. It will be mass unemployment = no livable society. Why should anyone be excited and be joking? Now this is what’s should be concerning, nothing else. We are witnessing the start of something really bad.
@spaghettiking6533 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25I'm not sure whether this will really replace doctors and stuff like that. Being a surgeon or dentist requires very fine motor control, extremely reliable expertise and knowledge, accountability, personality, etc., so as to not make a single mistake and to always navigate the patient's ill state perfectly. AIs and robots, which at this stage are far from known for their rigid foundations in any of these things, definitely have no ability to take any of these jobs. Moreover, if we really do eventually "solve" jobs, so that no one ever needs to work again, then we can rejoice at the fact that no one will be required to toil again. Things like UBI will become possible. The real doomsday scenario is if AI only succeeds in taking creative and artistic jobs, leaving humanity to do all the dead, manual labour. That is what I fear, not that doctors or actual trained professionals will be replaced.
@Tozu253 ай бұрын
@@spaghettiking653 I was diagnosed by an AI chatbot when I got my paid sick leave. I told the AI my symptoms, and got questions and then a real doctor signed the digital document and left. So it's already happening. Similar to anything, the AI does the task and then someone checks the result. But it's good that you are critical about AI, and looking both ways. You are the first one out of anyone, and I've spoken to like 15 people. That tells about intelligence, in you.
@danielrodrigues49033 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25 No, mass unemployment = new economic system and a break from the relentless capitalism dystopia we're experiencing. In big cities like London, regular new graduates can't even afford to buy houses on good salaries. The system is bullshit and needs to be torn down.
@Dorian-y3v3 ай бұрын
Cope.
@DETahaX3 ай бұрын
"officer hardass" kills me every time with that picture 😭😭
@kumarapillay31223 ай бұрын
before gpt used to be bad at doing even basic force questions. But to o1, i gave my fluid mechanics problem and it was able to do it and i didn't even upload the diagram pictures. Its gotten really good now
@hglbrg3 ай бұрын
OpenAI needs money, releases some reskinned GPT3.5 that asks "are you sure" secretly and send the response after that to the user to maintain hype, investor money and altmans job. Same bubble. Same hot (AI)r.
@justanotherchannelname12733 ай бұрын
Yeah, this was plain dissapointing. I was expecting some major architectural change with all the hype around 'Q*' but this is just another chatbot except it's trained to ask itself 'are you sure about that?' a couple of times and provide long COTs with a fancy UI to hide the complexity from users who don't know how to prompt worth a dang.
@DavidJames-lz8js3 ай бұрын
(AI)r = Air. I see what you did there 😏
@gramioerie_xi1333 ай бұрын
@@justanotherchannelname1273How in the hell is consistently beating human experts in several abstract fields not impressive to you
@indigitalcreativity45003 ай бұрын
@justano so what you expect from new AI, ?
@softwarerevolutions3 ай бұрын
Altman write a for loop on chatgpt UI
@codeaperture3 ай бұрын
Ah! 0 days since AI again?
@douwemusic3 ай бұрын
Spoiler alert-this will happen every time Fireship uploads about AI
@Tozu253 ай бұрын
Many people are forgetting for some reason that its not only affecting developers. AI will also take doctors, engineers, architechts, creators, actors, editors, pretty much everyones jobs. It will be mass unemployment = no livable society. Why should anyone be excited and be joking? Now this is what’s should be concerning, nothing else. We are witnessing the start of something really bad.
@mr.nixtheboarddrawer11753 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25 people don't want to work thats why
@Tozu253 ай бұрын
@@mr.nixtheboarddrawer1175 Well, the possible future products made by AI are not gonna be handed for free to you, unless society becomes socialist, and I don’t think that’s any more good.
@JimmyKrochmalska-f7p3 ай бұрын
@@Tozu25 None of that is going to happen. I wouldn't trust AI to be doing heart surgery even in 1,000 years, AI is AI, it's all guesswork, I would be more scared of *computers and simulations, as they actually involve math and physics, while AI just involves numbers multiplied by numbers multiplied by more numbers that eventually have an error that's small enough that works "good enough"* imagine that as your doctor, a doctor that MAYBE quite POSSIBLY will do the job right, also, you really think everyone's gonna lose their jobs in one night? Have you considered *us humans wanting the same thing as you, a livable society and preventing any of this happening, finding a solution, doing anything to make it all work out?* tl;dr AI is guesswork and we should worry more about nukes and simulations as simulations actually get math right (AI cannot make complex simulations because AI will get this line wrong or get this number slightly off)
@cbn13623 ай бұрын
It amazes me every time how I think about this channel was all about angular and firebase back in the days and where it is now.
@crackwitz3 ай бұрын
That's like a startup pivoting when they discover what the customers really need
@complexity55453 ай бұрын
Both, angular and firebase, are currently being re-obsoleted (by react, htmx, and svelte (or some combination)). Firebase has been dead about 8 years after it was born. Most wise programmers never used Firebase.
@softwarerevolutions3 ай бұрын
That's what i stumbled across. A channel supposed to be firebase documentation is doing all crazy stuff in th name of firebase. How could that be. Thank you now I get it.
@gnarpow3 ай бұрын
No kidding! lol
@Ashash98773 ай бұрын
Call me when it can become a professional poker player or blackjack counter so I can make millions at Stake, or how about a pro stock trader or something? Why has no one used openAI for this yet? In the future OpenAI might run entire countries GDP systems💀 Welcome our overlords.
@HockeyMan6663 ай бұрын
LOL that probably exist already but you cant rly share that with the public can u?? use ur brain
@peyopeev89093 ай бұрын
1.4k likes and nobody has mentioned that AI has been and it's used for both atm, you are for a wild ride pretty soon 😵💫
@bozydargroch97793 ай бұрын
@@peyopeev8909 yep. Botted likes?
@amaiaa88153 ай бұрын
Been there done that
@TheBcoolGuy3 ай бұрын
"GDP systems"
@nawawishkid3 ай бұрын
3:17 I've just tried asking the o1-preview model `How many "r" in the word strawberry?`, it answered 3 "r"s correctly at first try. Then in the same chat, I switched to 4o model, it said 2. 🤷 Then switched back to o1-preview, it even apologized for the mistake in the previous answer made by 4o. Pretty smart to me. 🎉
@rumfordc3 ай бұрын
then you're not very smart
@DeusExRequiem3 ай бұрын
2:08 the reason many people are moving over to Claude is because Claude isn't censored and is more useful for things like generating erotic content and conversations that don't sound like you're talking to HR, which is all that the majority of people care about. The o1 model is going to be great for jobs, it's a little more reliable for perfect answers, but the problem remains that corporations want something that's specifically useful and not generally useful, a lot of them have internal systems and custom setups that don't generalize, and they worry about data leaks, and would prefer the ability to run all of this in-house. The majority of AI users are fine with some generalization, can't afford to run the best ones in-house, and want it uncensored. Unless Microsoft can stay ahead, people will move on the moment something almost as good comes out that isn't censored, and Microsoft will be stuck catering to corporations who have demands.
@JanVerny3 ай бұрын
You're thinking about this all wrong. Consumer software is not where the money is at. Most profitable MS divisions are all centered around business products. They obviously want to sell AI to the business first and foremost. If you thought MS expects regular consumers to buy the Copilot+ computers, you're dead wrong. They don't care if literally no one buys it. Because business will eat that shit up. And big companies will pay insane money to get as you say their own specialized AI solutions. While things like Claude, will struggle to finance anything after they run out of venture capital.
@esarmiento73 ай бұрын
I just asked Claude for erotic content and he treated me like a pervert
@hastyscorpion3 ай бұрын
You think the reason most people use Claude is for “ erotic content” ? Dude you need to go outside and talk to actual humans more
@nousquest3 ай бұрын
Claude is much more censored. I can't get it to help me with the CTFs in my ethical hacking course.
@freeottis3 ай бұрын
In my experience Claude censors more. I tried asking it a question about what a stolen vehicle could be used for (a screenshot from a driver’s license exam) and it said nope. Chatgpt answered it.
@MustafaETKER3 ай бұрын
How can be someone so funny and so informative at the same time in just 5 minutes
@turolretar3 ай бұрын
Something, not someone
@diegogarcia.573 ай бұрын
Humans are the original AI
@tzardelasuerte3 ай бұрын
And so biased. No our jobs are never going away!!!! 😡😡😡😭😭😭
@MustafaETKER3 ай бұрын
@@turolretar wdym
@Dorian-y3v3 ай бұрын
He's from 4chan, that's why.
@yo-no98793 ай бұрын
1:19 good to see o1 is struggling big time with chemistry, gonna make a lot of chemists happy.
@lanceb90653 ай бұрын
I’ll be the 25th Chemist to give that a thumbs up 👍
@JasonStJohnRules3 ай бұрын
I mean, as a professional dev, it seems to me that 74.2% of problems are the first 10% of time spent on a project the other 90% is the other 26.8% of issues, and we're still safe there. It's actually nice that AI will get us there quicker.
@getreadytotube3 ай бұрын
Thanks!
@mirrorsreflectyou3 ай бұрын
But can this center a div?
@theterribleanimator17933 ай бұрын
not yet. It can plagiarize the code for a snake game though.
@friendlyfox21893 ай бұрын
😂
@livinghuman22983 ай бұрын
Cursor can, i think?
@CyanRooper3 ай бұрын
But can it do this? *bends chair backwards*
@gramioerie_xi1333 ай бұрын
@@theterribleanimator1793 Why do you people always accuse it of ‘plagiarism’ like that even makes any sense
@genzod-i6e3 ай бұрын
In those competitions were they using new challenges or old ones that the AI might have gone through during training?
@flarebear53463 ай бұрын
They were using old ones lmao
@veloce54913 ай бұрын
this is always my question but the answer is always hard to find. where would they even get all these completely original coding questions to test these models on?
@MindBlowerWTF3 ай бұрын
@@veloce5491 for GPT 4 they published a paper and they show the result for both. Can't find the paper on this model, but didn't look that hard.
@tamizharasanbe3 ай бұрын
"A car won't take your job, but a horse driving a car will" .... damn!!!! deeeeeeeeeeeppp
@toadlguy3 ай бұрын
The is the best overview of o1 I have seen yet 😊😊😊
@nejiabdurrahmen3 ай бұрын
3:23 you can really feel the frustration, amazing
@tabiserebour59123 ай бұрын
Whenever i see your video notifications, i start laughing even before watching the video😂
@existenceisillusion65283 ай бұрын
The core innovation driving o1 was made public about 6 months ago. And it really works, but we still have a long way to go. I tried it on 2 challenging problems, and it almost didn't suck.
@markmacharia51873 ай бұрын
where is it posted?
@imsleepy6203 ай бұрын
Fireship's definitely my favorite horse influencer
@Adambd993 ай бұрын
most based comment ever
@sandeepnautiyal30703 ай бұрын
"And O stands for ohh sh*t we are gonna d*e" is so apt and hilarious lmao
@Jackson_Zheng3 ай бұрын
0:25 Man, that clip was perfect lol
@sentinelav3 ай бұрын
I expected something crazy, but when I saw the benchmarks, they're really not that groundbreaking. o1's reasoning token paradigm serves as a middle layer for handling complex instructions, so it's more internally organised, but that doesn't necessarily mean the underlying architecture has substantially improved. Coding, maths and science are all topics where handling information in a purely linguistic context by default is detrimental, so it naturally follows that it would be more effective to logically deconstruct problems. However, you might see similar improvements with any other LLM by manually creating an intermediary prompting stage. This is still an improvement, but remember, a significant leap ahead at this stage would mean something as groundbreaking to transformers, as transformers were to RNNs, and this is nowhere close. Make no mistake, this is part of the plateau. There will still be progress, and we should be looking to concentrate that towards building tools to aid developers, rather an attempt to replace them.
@danielrodrigues49033 ай бұрын
We should be aiming to replace everyone. Always aim high.
@user-sb5vt8iy5q3 ай бұрын
Ok so when will they replace HR?
@chr0ne6923 ай бұрын
I am pretty sure GPT4 also prompts itself somewhat at least because I am remember one time it accidentally showed me it's internal prompting. It said something like "user wants to understand blah blah..." then abruptly switched to explaining what I wanted.
@Caphalem3 ай бұрын
You are correct, this is something ChatGPT does. It basically tries to create a more sophisticated prompt out of your prompt before actually addressing it. However, what these new models essentially do is check their answer and try to sanity check themselves several times before giving you the final response.
@chr0ne6923 ай бұрын
@@Caphalem I figured something like that. I just thought this distinction wasn't totally clear in the video, or maybe I wasn't paying enough attention. Thanks for the reply
@albercode95623 ай бұрын
My only concern is that AI goes full apocalypse mode after spending 2 days with my manager
@ArifBillahOnGoogle3 ай бұрын
Hi Jeff, I'm writing this comment to delightfully let you know that I absolutely like the way you do the "last kick" at the end of your videos sometimes. Beautifully crafted kick! Thanks. ❤
@notKhalid3 ай бұрын
to be clear, o1 are not actually new models themselves, they're built on top of gpt-4o models with extended inference abilities.
@sashub25933 ай бұрын
well, what you just said is quite obvious because if we think about it, no company is going to redesign the entire algorithm again to come up with a new model.
@tzardelasuerte3 ай бұрын
Correcto. Now in a few months gpt5 is coming out with all these advancements.
@David-gu8hv3 ай бұрын
Doesn't it use feed back now? Adding "one little change" can have profound effects...
@SpragginsDesigns3 ай бұрын
0:23 was a legit lol moment. Oh wait, so was most of the video.
@SkegAudio3 ай бұрын
came here to take a break from coursework, that avocado bit had laughing way too loud for a library 😂
@SpragginsDesigns3 ай бұрын
@@SkegAudio Nobody does the developer / comedy / memes / but still informative style he has. He's one of those "never miss a video" channels I have to watch on the spot.
@98ahni3 ай бұрын
As long as it can't solve the _"Okay, so hear me out."_ problems the client has with all the help of _"I'm sure you'll figure it out!"_ and (of course) no further details, I think my job is pretty safe.
@lyubo3 ай бұрын
Thanks
@UnbanMeNowOfficial3 ай бұрын
The balance between the potential and the realistic expectations is much needed in these discussions.
@MINIMAN100003 ай бұрын
To me the worst part is that it fails to strawberry test. For something that is a recursive self prompter, it sucks at prompting because constructing a proper prompt is literally the easiest way to pass the test.
@hendrx3 ай бұрын
Remember guys, we nerfed o1 when the hype was over, but o2 is gonna make a killing
@otpezdal3 ай бұрын
Please, write the same statement but for o3 in the future
@JimmyKrochmalska-f7p3 ай бұрын
@@otpezdal Don't worry guys, o8 was a flop but o9 is gonna beat us all
@kili203943 ай бұрын
As a coder and developer, I have no fear of "LLMs" taking my job. A lot of the stuff I code is too specific and niche for an LLM to figure out without having hella bugs.
@sajeucettefoistunevaspasme3 ай бұрын
as a 0.1x developper I am very afraid
@djs-vids3 ай бұрын
agreed, same
@fullstackweebdev3 ай бұрын
To replace me, the customer would need to know what they want and accurately describe it to an AI. I’m perfectly safe.
@djs-vids3 ай бұрын
@@fullstackweebdev and then be able to debug the trashy code AI produces
@byron_003 ай бұрын
@@fullstackweebdev well said. I push back on the garbage requirements I receive and help point the customer in the right direction for something more sane. A.I. will happily write a clucking fsck.
@Radblur3 ай бұрын
Like o1, Fireship's video production value and depth are getting better and better.
@marked753 ай бұрын
based on what you said, I think this confirms that they are now at the phase where they're doing clever implementations of the LLMs and being more specific in what it should generate well. In my opinion this is a sign that the technology is maturing, and the real potentially world changing products are coming. But it may also be a sign that this technology is at it's peak, when you can't go up, you go side ways
@bennythetiger60523 ай бұрын
I love how, by this point, people should've already realized they shouldn't freak out when new AI DLC drops, yet it all follows the same hype trend. They keep being like "oh, but this time it's for real", but until we see a real and fair example of it actually doing all these revolutionary things, it's illogical to assume things will be any different. It's not copium, it's just a matter of proof of concept
@turolretar3 ай бұрын
A horse walks into a bar. The bartender asks - why the long face?
@jonwinder66223 ай бұрын
I almost want fireship to stop posting. This channel is scaring the shit out of me and my career. This is fucking nuts
@hiya27933 ай бұрын
why, is your job creating tiny 300 line snake games?
@evolgenius11503 ай бұрын
Just use it. AI has become an amazing pair programmer and conversational wiki page. I like bouncing logic off of it and getting its feedback, and its ability to answer questions id normally send to stack exchange. If anything is loosing its job it will be stack exchange 😂 Just leverage the tool already. What it will make obsolete are low level junior programmers which no ai skills because ai fills in skill gaps. Junior devs will be expected to do more, and senior devs will be expected to do more. If anything AI will just make it so our jobs demand more of us, we’ll be expected faster turn around times or to ship twice as much code.
@jonwinder66223 ай бұрын
@@hiya2793 Oh if only that were all it could do.
@hiya27933 ай бұрын
@@jonwinder6622 I mean- Good luck throwing a 10.000 line project at chatgpt. As a matter of fact- Go and create a simple 2000 line vite project, with let's keep it small and simple and say 10 scripts vanilla js, a simple small game on an html canvas. No AI in the world comes even close to having enough tokens to even just read through that small af project- Let alone provide good additional code that doesn't suck aboslute balls without spending hours proompting - at which point you may aswell just write it yourself. AI is cool for stuff like: "How did flexbox go again? i'm too lazy to google, ai do it" or "ah crap i forgot the syntax for a switch case in some niche language - ai, you do it"
@divinecreation62 ай бұрын
Lmao dude your comment got copied and stolen by a bot.
@HarryEdwards-zk6ok3 ай бұрын
Thanks for updating us!
@pkingo13 ай бұрын
Experienced the same with coding, its initial output was impressive but I also hit that limit pretty quickly on what it could accomplish and it failed at certain tasks. So a marginal improvement from GPT-4o, which in itself is pretty impressive. Another huge leap in capabilities is still hard to imagine, but looking forward to it.
@naishiuan13 ай бұрын
o1ways 2 steps ahead!
@nicknelson19753 ай бұрын
It can build a game of Snake because there are thousands of open source examples online.
@w.mcnamara3 ай бұрын
This a million times over lmfao. If only the people hyping ai through the moon knew even the most basic aspects of how llms work
@iraniansuperhacker43823 ай бұрын
@@w.mcnamara I just remind them of how crazy their ideas are. I remind them that they are claiming that linear algebra and statistics have literally become living beings and can now reason like humans. The hype is just silly at this point, I just ask them how its possible literal math became conscious and I never get a reply back.
@micca9713 ай бұрын
@@iraniansuperhacker4382 Probably the same way a few neurons sending singals back and forth can become conscoius aka we don't know. We don't know what consciousness is, what do you need for that or how it comes to exist. Maybe even math can become conscious who knows. That said I'm not saying any AI is conscious or even that it will ever reach consciousness, just that we don't know if it is possible.
@iraniansuperhacker43823 ай бұрын
@@micca971 I would go as far as to say that math being processed on a silicon chip becoming conscious is physically impossible no matter how complex of a system it is. This is like saying if we write a sufficiently advanced piece of literature it will eventually be able to think or reason in some way. It just fundamentally doesnt make any sense.
@micca9713 ай бұрын
@@iraniansuperhacker4382 that's not same at all, a piece of literature does not compute or process anything it does not receive and manipulate energy, therefore it cannot do aynthing on its own. If however you said a lot of monkeys were writing books, then possibly the entire collective of monkeys writing books (a lot of them, trillions or quadrillions at least or maybe more) can become conscious or at least exhibit intelligent behaviour as we see with the current AI. Aka it's not just about complexity, it's about manipulating energy and data using some logic. Also keep in mind this is all very hypothetical, but you can't say it is fundamentaly wrong. We just don't know.
@co3udatel3 ай бұрын
3:32 Ну за фруктовый сад лайк однозначно
@mazenkhiami91163 ай бұрын
Something just to keep in mind, AI might get better, polishing existing tools etc.. butbin reality to ship a production grade ready software solution you always need a bunch of people, human thinking, applying execption rules here and there. Make tradeoff between technical debt and performance at multiple stages of product life. So a single or double queries to build up something is not gonna go anywhere..
@deleted-something3 ай бұрын
Okay but at this rate the next model with need .05% of the worlds energy to solve a question
@JimmyKrochmalska-f7p3 ай бұрын
Probably not because at that point none of the models would be even public even to anyone, .05% is a lot, but yeah it is getting pretty resource dependent
@strategistaow35203 ай бұрын
If ai can replace programmers, it can replace anyone
@szymoniak753 ай бұрын
yup!
@CyanRooper3 ай бұрын
Spy from TF2: "It could replace you, it could replace me. It could even replace..."
@sajeucettefoistunevaspasme3 ай бұрын
@@CyanRooper "it could even be your mother !"I haven't seen it for a while
@reinhardt_tv3 ай бұрын
Sadly, we don't leave in fantasy world and this thing will be massively disappointing
@ineeddaname23 ай бұрын
Not really. Coding has tons of sample data to train on. There's tons of obscure roles or tasks in the business world that could be replicated if the right training data was available but it isn't since it's only in some guys head
@NeonVisual3 ай бұрын
When we eventually get AGI it will be so expensive to run that we will only be able to turn it on for a fraction of a second to resolve all of humanity's problems. It will then take 10 years to work through all of the data created.
@the-sz8sq3 ай бұрын
Weirdly I've had the exact opposite experience from you. My first question what the strawberry question and it answered correctly and showed me the thought process. The code I've asked it to generate has been flawless and I've not experienced a single hallucination. Very strange.
@KyleHarrisonRedacted3 ай бұрын
First thing I asked o1 was what the difference between o1 and 4o was. It ran in circles for a little bit and ultimately asked me for more information. I said “it’s you. It’s gpt models” and it took like 25 more seconds of thought and came up with the answer it had no idea what I was talking about because its training was capped to Sept 2023. I then gave it a prompt about colostomy bags, and it’s only here in this video I’m now learning about that these steps I’m getting it to take might one day cost me extra money. Well nuts to that, the subscription is already expensive enough and barely justifiable. Guess I’ll stick with 4o for most things
@mrkingsquid203 ай бұрын
so cooked I'm watching this during comp sci class
@hvr84633 ай бұрын
Too late for a refund?
@notme39873 ай бұрын
Have faith brother, see this AI scare as a good thing.
@turolretar3 ай бұрын
What’s cooking? Where’s mine
@NoName-cd5ft3 ай бұрын
Me too 😢. Does anyone have any suggestions about how to stay relevant.
@ogs_Boga19003 ай бұрын
Don't go study what everyone does. Go off the beaten path
@will_abule3 ай бұрын
But can it be monetised?
@wojtek9873 ай бұрын
What I was disappointed most about with this new "thinking" preview model is that it still has almost no awareness of anything relating to itself. Whenever I ask a question about itself, its hallucination rate is like 85%
@yousefsuliman3 ай бұрын
This is likely intentional. They said they are intentionally hiding the chain of thought from the users.
@Easternromanfan3 ай бұрын
I mean yeah it still is a LLM
@latt.qcd92213 ай бұрын
Why would it be aware of itself? It's just an LLM.
@tribeholz233 ай бұрын
I‘m pretty sure that chatgpt is not aware of any concept it generates as output. Pattern recognition and awareness are two distinct things.
@PS3PCDJ3 ай бұрын
It will take years for AI to plateau, sure the specific method like GPT might plateau, but not the field in general. We have barely started with this and I 100% believe that the improvements are going to be even faster and better now
@aelisenko3 ай бұрын
@fireship Devin did not go to 74% with o1 model, that is Devins own production model (some fine tuned version of existing models). the comparison was betwen base GPT4o and o1 and it got up to 51%.
@kjul.3 ай бұрын
So it's basically just a custom version of GPT-4o which iteratively prompts itself until it has found the desired solution? Or is there something more to it?
@igorthelight3 ай бұрын
We don't know. Code is close sourced
@szymoniak753 ай бұрын
@@igorthelight OPEN AI :)
@igorthelight3 ай бұрын
@@szymoniak75 Yeah, OpenAI is not open. Not really logical xD
@kevshow3 ай бұрын
Most likely what happened is they trained a model that is better or fine-tuned rather for looking at a previous generated context window of questions and thought processes. So the “reasoning model”. Which was likely trained from the same distilled data as GPT4o since this model actually only goes to oct 2023 and current 4o goes to December. But then they take the question, “reasoning tokens” are 4o or 4o mini variant that creates all kinds of prompts and potential solutions. Then this new model reasons “” about it as it’s designed to do based on training on looking at potential options and then tries to come up with a better solution. Hence the chain of thought here is really all they did and is something people built pretty much in the first 2 months of llama coming out and has been a concept since then that people have had high success with. So likely nothing truly special here. People had already reported smashing zero shot benchmarks with chain of thought on math and other stuff.
@DEUTSCHWULF3 ай бұрын
By the time I finish writing this comment, this model will already be outdated.
@Trauma_Clown3 ай бұрын
what if I dont finish reading your comment?
@shivarajchangale473 ай бұрын
oh my god 😅😅
@divinecreation62 ай бұрын
Didn't age well 😂😂
@Tekaisuwu3 ай бұрын
3:28 the Chain of Thought isn't hidden, you just have to click on it lol
@Fireship3 ай бұрын
That's not the raw chain of thought, just a summary. This is what OpenAI says "After weighing multiple factors including user experience, competitive advantage, and the option to pursue the chain of thought monitoring, we have decided not to show the raw chains of thought to users"
@Tekaisuwu3 ай бұрын
@@Fireship ohh ok gotcha
@Kinnr_2 ай бұрын
5:03 Did you try using language to explain to gpt that you wanted the original code provided but to look out for the errors? I've found you can often convince it to fix the error it made if proper language and goal-seeking is used
@r.k.vignesh78323 ай бұрын
Correct me if I'm mistaken, but doesn't this new model just apply (invisible) chain-of-thought reasoning to any given prompt, which is what good prompters used to do themselves when the model gets stuck? It's still useful because the user doesn't need to know or take the time to craft their prompt out that way (I get it - I've only done COT once or twice myself out of laziness), but is it actually BETTER than the older models or is it just comparable to using optimized prompts for each question?
@ryzikx3 ай бұрын
didnt expect nikocado cameo on Jeff Fireship's channel!
@BrandonAaskov3 ай бұрын
lol officer hardass with that image 😂
@officebatman94113 ай бұрын
whos that?
@therealkon_3 ай бұрын
@@officebatman9411 Officer Hardass
@ryzikx3 ай бұрын
@@officebatman9411 someone who got fired for doing certain activities when she shouldnt have been
@JM-st1le3 ай бұрын
😂
@bigbigdog3 ай бұрын
@@ryzikx doing certain activities to the whole goddamn police dept
@PatrickHoodDaniel3 ай бұрын
My prompt for the number of "r"s in the word "strawberry" got it right.
@Scrubzei3 ай бұрын
Mine didn't
@PatrickHoodDaniel3 ай бұрын
@@Scrubzei interesting.
@purplebuckwheat3 ай бұрын
Even GPT-4 legacy got that one right for me.
@rumfordc3 ай бұрын
@@PatrickHoodDaniel LLM's don't give consistent answers because 1) they're rate limited and the amount of compute spent changes the answer and 2) they have a 'temperature' parameter which is effectively just RNG when selecting from the top token candidates 3) every single character you type is a completely new input so something as simple as leaving out a question mark will potentially get a different answer
@jantube3583 ай бұрын
1:44 Devin... Devin... What happened to the open-source alternative Devika? I don't see any updates there anymore although it looked so good.
@Soulcode-k3 ай бұрын
It's so fun to see code report ❤❤❤
@VeryUniqueRandomName3 ай бұрын
74% might sound like a lot for a non-technical person, but for those who know what is SLA and how hard to go from 99.9 to 99.99, 74% is not even worth looking. Though I have doubts that LLM models will ever reach 99%
@peterhorton90633 ай бұрын
Right being 95 percent accurate in your compute is terrible for most things. Imagine 1/20 words you speak and interpret wrong while not even knowing they were wrong. Errors would compound all over.
@egodreas3 ай бұрын
@@peterhorton9063 I'm sure it wouldn't be too bad. I suspect that most people would probably understand you just pineapple.
@Haise-san3 ай бұрын
@@egodreasFor people yeah, but condoms for sure need it to be accurate for them to work and solve problems.
@Dorian-y3v3 ай бұрын
Lil' bro. Real human workers ain't pulling 99.99 success rate. What are you yapping about