ANM नर्स वक़ीलों की हुई शिकार//Vivek Aggarwal//MP High court Jabalpur bench Court no. 9//

Justice Vivek Aggarwal//Madhya Pradesh High court Jabalpur bench Court no. 9//Madhya Pradesh high court #court #law
justice Vivek Aggarwal
Patna High court
judiciary of India
Indian court
law student
law educationIndian law
best justice of India
education system
justice motivational video
reaction video
MP Highcourt
जिला अदालत
भारतीय कानून संहिता
भारतीय कानून
कानून की पढ़ाई
लॉ डिग्री
बेस्ट लॉ यूनिवर्सिटी
high court allahabad
high court Idc
high court exam
high court live
rajasthan high court
high court group d
high court patna
high court exam date
ap high court
high court song
high court judge
high court assistant allahabad high court group d
madras high court
Idc high court exam date high court exam date 2022 allahabad high court vacancy
mp high court
supreme court
allahabad high court vacancy 2022
high court jobs allahabad high court group c high court exam date 2022 high court result 2022
allahabad high court vacancy 2022 high court syllabus 2022
high court recruitment 2022
allahabad high court group c vacancy 2022
high court jobs 2022 Idc high court vacancy 2022
Idc vacancy 2022
madras high court recruitment 2022
rajasthan high court vacancy 2022
high court answer key 2022 high court Idc result
allahabad high court cut off 2022rajasthan high court Idc
gujarat high court
allahabad high court group c high court Idc exam
Idc syllabus 2022
rajasthan high court Idc vacancy 2022
high court exam questions and answers patna high court judge
high court apply online 2022
denil classes
high court junior assistant syllabus
high court group d exam date 2022 high court exam syllabus 2022
high court hall ticket download 2022
Rajasthan High Court New Building Jodhpur
Allahabad High Court
Allahabad High Court
Prayagraj
Exam
Rajasthan
Patna High Court
Patna
Andhra Pradesh
Syllabus
High Court Of Andhra Pradesh
Judge Gujarat
High Court of Gujarat
Clerk
Madras High Court
Job
Form
Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Supreme court
Recruitment
UEFA Euro 2021 Group D
Nikaya
Karnataka Common Entrance Test
Argument
Other Backward Class
Hijab
2021â€"22 UEFA Champions League
Common scold
qualification Computer operator
High Court of Himachal Pradesh Shimla
Rojgar With Ankit
Clerk
Service of process Syllabus
High Court Of Andhra Pradesh Rajasthan High Court New Building Jodhpur
Patna High Court
Patna
Form
Judae
Prayagraj
Andhra Pradesh
Job
Allahabad High Court
Disclaimer
Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.

[@rajtoshvlogs1279]

कोर्ट यह कह दे की वकील की वजह से केस खारिज हुआ तो। उस वकील से दी गई फीस की दस गुना वसुली क्लाइंट को मिले ऐसा कानून होना चाहिए या फिर वकील की वजह से कोई केस खारिज हो रहा है यह कोर्ट जानती है तो तुरंत उस केस को बहाल कर देना चाहिए।

[@aaaryan_goel]

vakeel petitioner krta h. Galat vakeel client ki zimmedaari h. Court ko usse kya mtlb.

[@Abbey_786]

​@@aaaryan_goelhaan court ko kya matlab hoga. Jab waqil violence karte hain toh unke saath khade rehne k liye hain na wo toh

[@wellnessforall6663]

​@@aaaryan_goel मतलब होना चाहिए क्योंकि किसी पिटीशनर को सपना नहीं आयेगा कि जो वकील वो कर रहे हैं वो उनका केस चौपट कर देगा। बल्कि ऐसे में तो जज को पिटीशनर के प्रति और भी संवेदनशील होना चाहिए। जज का एकमात्र उद्देश्य होना चाहिए हर हाल में दुखी और पीड़ित को न्याय दिलाना।

[@digarrawat8664]

जब कभी भी कोई केस किसी अधिवक्ता की लापरवाही के कारण खारिज हो जाए या फिर क्लाइंट को न्याय न मिले तो क्लाइंट उसकी शिकायत बार काउंसिल ऑफ द स्टेट या फिर बार काउंसिल ऑफ इंडिया में कर सकता है

[@ashishdavessar6970]

You are talking nonsense.There was no urgency in the petition, yet this lady chose to appear herself and argue when lawyers were abstaining from work. Had she not appeared, then her case would have been adjourned like all other cases. Heavens would not have fallen if case got adjourned but clients like her who do not heed what their lawyers tell them and play oversmart, deserve this fate. Even in the beginning when she began arguing her case the judge warned her that if she opts to argue her own case in the absence of her lawyer then he will not adjourn the case, yet she persisted in arguing. She destroyed her own case, and deserved what she got.

[@abhisheklucas11]

"Maine dekh liya , gate me khade hai" was epic🤣

[@babulalsarkar4292]

Justice vivek Agarwal is one of the best judges ever seen. Justice Vivek Agarwal is the man of knowledge of the law.

[@learnRTIact]

*Hon'ble Justice sir had very outstanding eye, great observation, advocate must be punished according to law*

[@prakir3590]

20 August 2008 appointment letter issued & was supposed to join work... She did not join & after 12 years she woke up.. Right judgment given.. Also the lawyers deserve to be jailed for leaving the client at the crunch movement...

[@adityamohit1773]

Not at all......appointment letter was issued but she never had the knowledge about it and she never got one through post or anything like that.......when she got to know about it then she filed a case for her rights...I can be wrong as there must be more facts related to this but she failed to explain her point thoroughly to the court due to her advocate.The notice of contempt by the lordship was 100% right as due to these advocates, their clients suffer....

[@Sunil.Chaurasia]

वकीलों को विशेष सुरक्षा का कानून चाहिए जिससे कि वो और मनमानी करें और क्लाइंट कुछ बोले तो उस पर भी जुल्म करने की छूट मिले

[@alparathod196]

Vakil ab khud criminal ban gaye hai..advance fees vasul lete hai..fir man mani karte hai..negligency rakhte hai..fon nahi uthate, ham kuch keh nhi skte unka ego hurt hota hai to case chhod dete hai paise vapas bhi nahi dete. Koi vakil to only time leta rehta hai case kharab kar ne k liye.

[@Siddhant-dk4nx]

बिल्कुल कानून बनाए बिना ही ये हो रहा है।

[@Sandeep-tc1yv]

The Honorable Judge has given the right judgement following the law. 1) The lady was not aware of the facts of her own case. 2) She could not explain, what was she doing for 8 years. 3) It appears she wanted to play emotional and women's cards which won't work at the high court. 4) Generally some people feel overconfident and appear PIP (party in person), hence they also ask their lawyers not to appear for the matter. Such things backfire.

[@pareshmokani]

Your point No. 3 is the most valid one. They want to play that card first.

[@nirdoshyadav7074]

शर्मनाक निर्णय। जज महोदय ने शिकायतकर्ता को वकील की अनुपस्थिति में अपना पक्ष ठीक से रखने का अवसर ही नहीं दिया। इन महिला को विभिन्न निर्देशों के साथ अपने पक्ष रखने के लिए अगली तारीख दी जानी चाहिए थी। बस ऐसे ही न्यायपालिका निर्णय लेती रहे और शीघ्र ही लोग कोर्ट का मुंह देखना बंद कर देंगे। शिकायतकर्ता को संबंधित वरीय के पास रजिस्टर्ड डाक से स्वयं को उचित अवसर न दिए जाने की शिकायत करनी चाहिए। जो न्यायपालिका पर विश्वास रखते हुए उसके दरवाजे पर जाए उसको वकीलों के हांथ का खिलौना नही बन ने देना चाहिए।

[@rohanjn4438]

The judgement makes sense actually. He decided the matter on merits. Irresponsible lawyer who was aptly charged with contempt. Hon'ble Justice followed PNJ and gave an opportunity to present the case, the lady couldn't. She can't be sleeping on her rights for so long, then file a case and not even know the facts. I understand being nervous in such a situation, but she said almost nothing according to this video.

[@commercesession100]

People who are saying that judgement is wrong then just know that you got fooled by your emotions. If you think from logic you can see why judge passed the judgement.

[@Tubelightblink]

फट्टू निकला ये तो, ये वो वकील है जो पैसा थाम के client को बड़े बड़े आश्वाशन देते है और 500 रूपिये दे कर किसी अनुभवी typist से writ draft करवा लेते है और फिर जब बहस की पारी आती है court में तो हालत खराब हो जाती है, कोई बात नही, judge साहब को atlaest एक date देना चाहीए था और फर्जी वकीलों से बच कर रहने की सलाह देनी थी।

[@deveshmahor7122]

Sahab ka kya hai.. unhone to nyay kar diya.. judge bhi vakil se hi darta hai.... Janta ko bo kuch nahi samajhte

[@Adv.1213]

जज से कोई उम्मीद nhi रखना वकील ही sb kuch hota ye log जमीन से जुड़े nhi hote आमिरो ke बनाए गए है

[@trickved]

😂वाह चु/***

[@gupta8993]

agree

[@rakeshtripathy1668]

Bar council ko turant aise advocate ki Licence hi cancel karna chahiye jiske bajese case hi kharij ho gaya.. Aise advocate ko to adhikaar ho nahi judiciary me kaam karne ko

[@mickeyagrawal2001]

We do not know what happened and She has the right to sue the advocate in case he failed in his job Probably he was not paid his fees. In any case the problem is the lobby which defends such lawyers. We do not want to fight the lobby but we want to fight an individual. Until the whole lobby is punished no individual would be.

[@vineetrathore1532]

आदेश देने वाले देने में आनाकानी करें तो इसकी अपील उच्च स्तर पर होती है और इसके ऊपर सूचना आयुक्त के यहां ‍केश फायल करें।

[@nathgoody5905]

ये औरत १२ साल से सो रही थी, जिसको नौकरी चाहिए वह पहाड़ पे भी चढ़ जाता है , ये चार साल पहले तो पता करने गई थी उसके बाद क्या कर रही थी, झूठी लग रही ये औरत , वक़ील भी भाग सकता है

[@sahibvirk]

Waah re Vakiloan waah! Aisa lawyer hone se achchha toh in person case ladna chahiye.

[@kuldipjamwal6078]

Good judge sahib.Mein bhi isi tareh apne vakil ke dhokhe ka hp high court mein -2018 hua tha. Senior vakil ke kehne uski jr vakil mook-darshak khadi rahi. Koi paksh nahin rakha. Mein court mein nahin tha. Case ke dismissal order ko padne se mujhe pata chala Highly payment ke baad bhi mera kes khrab kr diya. Afsos ke vo aisee sr vakil isi high court main judge bani hai. Aise vakil ho apne client ke saath dhokha krte hain unke khilaf kiya vidhan hai Aise log judge honge to niyaye milna mushkil hai. Khuda Desh ko bacha le JaiHind.

[@yogeshmahajanlegal]

The case has no merits as she failed to explain the delay of 12 years. Such petitions r routinely dismissed on grounds of delay latches. The law is very much clear that impugned order can be challenged within period of 1 year. Its well settled that person cannot sleep over his rights. People in India still hesistate in moving to the courts. If contract employee approaches to the court, the authorities decline to extend their contract

[@ultapultaarun]

Agar aisa tha to vakeel ko petition banani hi nhi chahiye thi na

[@yogeshmahajanlegal]

@@ultapultaarun practising lawyer know everything. Those who tender regular appearances in court n deals with matter knows the fate of the cades. In service matters a large number of petitions r regularly dismissed on grounds if limitation, res judicata, non availing of remedies at lower levels

[@rishikumar-di4ce]

@@ultapultaarun bhai unhe tao paisa chahiye

[@ultapultaarun]

@@rishikumar-di4ce hmm

[@AmitGupta-te2fx]

Advocates jo aisa krte h ya jinko kanoon hi nhi pta wo logo ko dikhe se paise lete hain.. Inke against bhi action jruri h

[@deveshmahor7122]

Wah ji kya nyay hai... Sir ke court ke balik na Ane par jo musibat me hai use hi saja suna di😂😂😂😂 Mahan ho Prabhu...🙏 Sir Aaj ek court ke judge bhalehi ho par ek adalat upar bale ki bhi lagti hai...😂😂😂😂

[@rohanjn4438]

After 12 yrs of negligence she should be given another chance? Why?

[@anirudhanirudh1975]

One who has to take job should be proactive. Probably she did not wanted to joint at that time and now creating ruckus with 12 year old order. Till 12 year she was in deep sleep, with not with even single correspondence with authorities. And seeing the job of medical/paramedics, which is highly medicolegal and involve so much of documentation now a days , she is unfit for that job.

[@allahram6102]

Court ki bar council ko aise vakil par action lena chahiye client se paise khane ke bad case beech me chhorh kar gayeb ho jate hain ya dusri party se bhi paisa kha kar case chhod dete hain

[@thechandresh5985]

The judgment is wrong .🤬🤬🤬🤬 They should have been given her another chance...

[@rohanjn4438]

After 12 yrs of negligence she should be given another chance? Why?

[@kavykalasangam-rajeshramukaka]

वकीलों की फीस निर्धारित होना चाहिए। और गलती करें तो सजा भी

[@vineetrathore1532]

सूचना अधिकार के तहत इस आदेश को प्राप्त कर लें ।

[@kunalsinghbaby5308]

Yein Jo Jaz Shahab Hain Bahut Hi.. Achhe Lge Hume ..

[@manojjha8414]

To agar waqil aapka beimani kare to aapko nyay nahi milega?? To nyay tabhi milega jab waqil chahega???? Dhikkar hai

[@sweetspicy7880]

Contempt of court laga ha na , she can file again with a different lawyer .

[@MrAbhishekricky]

@@sweetspicy7880 contempt case on advocate and case dismissed

[@deepakshrivastava6471]

ये बहुत सही है,केस जीतने के लिए विपक्षी वकील खरीद लो बस।

[@rohanjn4438]

The judgement makes sense actually. He decided the matter on merits. Irresponsible lawyer who was aptly charged with contempt. Hon'ble Justice followed PNJ and gave an opportunity to present the case, the lady couldn't. She can't be sleeping on her rights for so long, then file a case and not even know the facts. I understand being nervous in such a situation, but she said almost nothing according to this video.

[@S.suman.1437]

Insaan ki kimat kya hai ab pata laga Judge is not cooperating

[@nathgoody5905]

उस वक़ील का नाम बताना चाहिये ताकि आगे से कोई उसके चक्कर में ना पड़े

[@pprrestak.409]

Salut hi zaz sahabko

[@mahendraydv1479]

जज ने गलत किया गलती वकील की है तो सजा क्लाइंट क्यू भुगते नेक्स्ट टाइम अच्छे वकील के साथ डेट दे देते

[@shivjeettiwari5454]

बस इतना ही तो काम बचा है, वकीलों की वजह से भुगता है तो भविष्य में उस वकील को कोई भी लेने से बचेगा

[@Mohammadumarbhatwushu]

So sad for this lady..everybody has to follow the judiciary rules...

[@ramsahu6342]

Mil gaya nyay mera desh mahan, in jaj sahab ko bahut jyada hadbadi rahti hai, jamini star se juda vyakti hi satik nirnay le sakta hai, kabhi inke hadbadhat me kiss nirdosh no fasi n ho jaye

[@sciencewithsantanu8120]

It's a very fare judgement.

[@aliens4608]

झुठ मुठ का case करोगे तो वकील भी नही मिलेगा

[@abhaykaransinghsodhaabhayk5103]

Bharta ki nyayvyvsatha ki jai ho

[@bhupendraindian496]

galti kisi aur ki saja koi aur bhukte ye galat hai ye saf saf anyay hai

[@mickeyagrawal2001]

Our legal system is sometimes not practical. Justice should be given even when not requested. A person should not have to take efforts to get justice. We have a very stupid justice system. Shame on us that we have failed basic logic.

[@raghavuchil2098]

what nonsense you are talking about? The lady failed in her duty. Justicve delivered correctly. Judge is right in his execution of verdeict.

[@mickeyagrawal2001]

@@raghavuchil2098 Let me explain to you what non sense I am talking about with a caveat that my comment was not made specifically for this case but it was a general comment on the state of affairs of legal system of our country. A person who is already struggling and lacks funds and knowledge of legal system is forced to hire a lawyer and then that lawyer fails to do his job completely. The lady may or may not have won the case, I am not going into the merits of this case but the mere fact that she has no idea what's happening simply because her lawyer failed her and now she has no chance to get justice (either in her favor or against her) is problematic. My issue is with the fact that justice is easily available to rich people who can hire expensive lawyers but not to a middle class person or poor person who are even scared of going to courts. A person has to suffer so much in getting justice that most of the times people are not even able to claim their basic rights. Also simple procedural compliances should not cause trouble to people but what we see is completely different. Equality is important and we seldom see such equality in our justice system.

[@rupaksanyal1309]

@@mickeyagrawal2001 well it is true that her lawyer failed her and because of that the court issued contempt notice to the lawyers. But there is another side to this, after all this is her case, she is the party and its perfectly fine for her to not to know the law, but it can very well be expected that she at least know the facts of her own case. The judge repeatedly asked her to represent the facts she couldn't even say how she was wronged or at least the very incident from start to finish, he even asked specific questions, but she couldn't even answer those. The judge also gave her husband a chance to argue but the husband seemed pretty reluctant, so it will be very wrong to say that the legal system failed her.

[@abhisheklucas11]

@@raghavuchil2098 Bhai u did not understand the fact that was pointed out by the Hon'ble . U have to work really hard, u r at the elementary level.

[@mickeyagrawal2001]

@@rupaksanyal1309 What you are saying is completely logical but sometimes people are not able enough to do things which may appear very basic to us. We can both agree that she genuinely believed she was wronged and that she must have been aware of the issues and facts but she still failed to argue those which means that for whatever reason she was incapable to stand in the court and argue her case. For example should we deny justice to a person simply cause they are not intellectually smart enough to answer basic factual questions ! If she had more money and could hire a bigger lawyer perhaps she might have even won the case. This differentiation shouldn't be there in the field of law and justice. But my comment was also made considering general state of affairs. People guilty of high level crimes are being given bail or are being allowed to go free simply cause the state attorney is either corrupt or the guilty person is able to use the weakness of the system to get himself out of the mess. Most people believe that system is more supportive of criminals than victims and no one can blame these people either. Its indeed hard to get justice.

[@chetanseth2487]

isne khariz kyu kiya , bahot akad hai isme , uski baat nhi sun rha hai ...vakeel ne kiya usko de contempt of court ka notice uska case kyu khariz kiya ...aise judge ko suspend kr chahiye...judge hai to baat nhi sunega kisi ki

[@KanwarpreetSohal]

Sahi baat hai aage ki date de skta tha, tab tak petitioner koi aur vakeel ko hire kr leti.

[@happyteen7195]

tere padosi nhi h wo, ki teri bina sar payr ki baatein sunega. judge h jab court me opinion rkhna nhi aata, to nhi jaate, aur bewakoof ki trah comment nhi kiya krte

[@chetanseth2487]

@@happyteen7195 tera podosi hai kya

[@chetanseth2487]

@@happyteen7195 bahot dikkat hai comments se to disable kr de comments ko

[@rupaksanyal1309]

bhai courts emotion se nahi chalti...practicality se chalta hain logic se chalta hain....judge ne bohot saare sawal kiye jinka uttar woh nahi de pai...fir judge unka husband ko bhi argue karne k liye bola husband bhi argue nahi kara...itna sab kuch k bad judge kya karega...aur merits main bhi case kaa kuch nahi hain. 12 sal se unhone chup raha fir akdin achanak high court main case kar diya... ek normal citizen ko law ki knowledge na ho toh chalta hain lekin atleast unhe apna facts toh janna chahiye khud ka story khud ko toh janna chahiye...

[@ShiftySkunk]

Judge records that the Petitioner is not in a position to assist the Court and yet he passed an order of dismissal on merits. That’s quite unfair and insensitive to a party-in-person.

[@warishgurung1317]

Jo wakil nahe aya usko toh kuch nahi kiya .uske na anese khariz kardiya wakilon ka sab mili bhagat hai jo wakil case leke court mein last time pe nahe aya usko kya saja hogi plz explain kare

[@ultapultaarun]

इन चार भाडू वकीलों से जबलपुर के लोगों को सचेत रहना चाहिए।

[@trickved]

सही बात है

[@vkkhanna2653]

In my view, a chance should be given to her before pronouncing the order by the Lordship. It all had happened due to non appearance of the Advocate.

[@rohanjn4438]

The judgement makes sense actually. He decided the matter on merits. Irresponsible lawyer who was aptly charged with contempt. Hon'ble Justice followed PNJ and gave an opportunity to present the case, the lady couldn't. She can't be sleeping on her rights for so long, then file a case and not even know the facts. I understand being nervous in such a situation, but she said almost nothing according to this video.

[@Royal_maratha1]

12 साल सो रही थी क्या आधी सर्व्हिस हो जाती

[@danish5458]

Review Petition dalo .

[@kavykalasangam-rajeshramukaka]

इस वकील का लाइसेंस रद्द करो

[@veervenkat9273]

Thik kiye hai 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@user-mg6ko9oj5i]

Please give english subtitles

[@manikverma2123]

Limitation not followed where was she from past 12 years the main question arises.

[@ddnick]

Judges apne alag hi ego trip me rehte h , Jaha jarurat nhi hoti waha personally apni chaa mudayenge beyond the law logic daal ke aur jaha jarurat h waha " we should follow the law " bolke anyay karte h. Clearly samjh arha h case

[@rupaksanyal1309]

haa case samajh aaraha hain...yeh hi samajh aaraha hain ki she was extremely negligent, she adressed her concern after 12 long years. She couldn't even say what happened to her from start to finish. The judge asked her for when the order was passed and she replied with "jab hum Mandla gain thein" is this how you reply to a very specific question. The judge even gave her husband a chance to argue, but the husband was reluctant. Blame the judge after you go through the facts, its very easy to blame someone without thinking from their stand point.

[@ashah1451]

12 sal tak koi ne ek correspondence nhi kra apni joining order ke liye yeh kaise possible hai😂😂😂

[@vundyalaphanisheakerreddy2055]

Jogi ji toko toko Atiq Ahmed ko toko toko toko ❤😮😊Jogi ji toko toko Atiq Ahmed ko toko toko toko ❤😮😊Jogi ji toko toko Atiq Ahmed ko toko toko toko ❤😮😊

[@Sadashiv_bhau]

Ise to kuch pata hi nahi ise kyun naukri nahi mili aur high court me bahas karne aa gayi hai...Judge law se bandhe hue wo kuch bhi judgement nhi de sakte hai

[@dhananjay9984]

Ye jaanbhuj kar join nahi ki thi...nautanki kar rahi hai yaha per ...judgements is 100% correct.

[@binduprasad2822]

Inko bolne ka hi dhang na h hr bat husband pr isara kr rhi h dgree bs li hongi pdhi hoti to itna lamba asa chutiya vkil thodi krti

[@gauravmahajan2044]

Bhai log vo lowyer nahi he aap log bhi gharvalo ko puchate hoge malum nhi hoga to

[@AtulRawat96]

@@binduprasad2822 tum log kitne ghatiya ho, me khud situation se guzar rha hu, mera joining letter ni aya or sbka aa chuka h, same case h, advocate 85 thousands le chuka h, sb jagah ja chuka hu, av v case chal rha h, tum log kya jano joining na ane ka dard😞

[@Drunkenmaster632]

@@AtulRawat96 Case chal raha hai na. 12 saal so ke uske baad to nahi kiya na case

[@AtulRawat96]

@@Drunkenmaster632 12 sal bad case ho v jata h mujhe to ye ab pta chala h, jbki mere advocate ne to ye bola ki 1 sal se jyada late huye to ni hoga

[@daredevil_493]

कुछ वकील बहुत बड़े हारामी होते है।।

[@vivekvashishth4405]

There may be reason that client didn't pay the fee and thats why he is not coming or he was not preparrd for argument... 😂

[@utvcourt24]

the lawyers were on strike at that time.

[@vivekvashishth4405]

@@utvcourt24 okay.... Good... But i am on lawyer side brother..

[@Pahadi_Paradise]

Case mai kuch nahi hai ..

[@Bimal_Kumar_Bidyadhar]

accha hua

[@Delhitravelview]

Payment issue hai, i think

[@alpha1442]

Desh ka kya haal hai, jab jaj hi nirday ho 😓

[@moviespoint6722]

Yhi to jab judge hi sarkar ke honge to fir kase sunege ye , Mere papa ka case kafi sal se chal rha h sarkar se lekin wo har bar date bada dete h ,or ek bar to judgment bhi ho gya lekin bjp sarkar ne cort ki nhi mani or fir se case ulta karke court me fir chalu kar diay h

[@andrewcarnegie5342]

Abe chomu after 12 years of sleep now she suddenly woke up and wants that job, she didn't join at that time. This case has nothing in it. 😂

[@bitcoinindia8777]

Vakil ne Paisa khaya hoga

[@shuklamaggi]

Why was the fault of that women.....!

[@dileshkumar8989]

य़ह सही नहीं है/ ना ही एसा ठीक है

[@hemantchoudhary9709]

This is recording video that’s why we think that are doing as per law but we all know how judiciary works and what happens under the table

[@udbhavsingh2921]

Lawyer to be taken to task?

[@rupaksanyal1309]

contempt notice issued

[@udbhavsingh2921]

Lawyer has betrayed the client to get justice in time?

[@rishikumar-di4ce]

he thought it would make women card and play emotional drama with judge but women is dumb. she doesn't know her posting and i am sure her lawyer would have told her to play emotional but she is dumb. doesn't care about her joining date.

[@sun4422]

ये ग़लत है

[@gurcharansingh5322]

she will suffer for entire life now just coz of happenings

[@kishanlalrohilla]

Should have been helped and properly concluded. An law unkonwn person with poor advocates can't get justice on right time and rightly. Fir who her advocate working.

[@rohanjn4438]

After 12 yrs of negligence she should be given another chance? Why?

[@kishanlalrohilla]

Why advocate not supported. She had been trapped in and out of law. Whatever law says.

[@rohanjn4438]

@@kishanlalrohilla The judgement makes sense actually. He decided the matter on merits. Irresponsible lawyer who was aptly charged with contempt. Hon'ble Justice followed PNJ and gave an opportunity to present the case, the lady couldn't. She can't be sleeping on her rights for so long, then file a case and not even know the facts. I understand being nervous in such a situation, but she said almost nothing according to this video.

[@kishanlalrohilla]

@@rohanjn4438 this not is agreeable.

[@Studyy88]

Middle class k liye govt job bahut badi baat hoti hai aaj ek vakil ki wjh se ek ko naukri nahi mil pai.

[@rohanjn4438]

After 12 yrs of negligence she should be given another chance? Why?

[@user-dy7mw6ny8y]

Jaj be apny ap ko bhagwan samjty hai vakel ko ghnta fark pady ga os ny fees ly le apni nuksan os aurt ka ho gya jo etny sal sy dhky kha rhi bena job ky apni ego ky karn far rol deya os ko

[@gyanibaba6900]

Guys there is no mistake of Adv. The adv appears into rhe court when they think the case arguable... Why they will appear to spoil there head count of loosing the case. It's seems the lethargic approch of the couple only who came to know about the order in 2016 and filed case in 2020. 😂

[@jaigodara3334]

Ye to galat baat hai

[@pooja.sharma-]

Poor people have no life in india

[@kddesigner149]

Kya ghatiya vakeel hai shod ke bhag gya 😏

[@moviespoint6722]

Ghatya judge h

[@ashish-nh5fp]

Aise ladkia khud ki galti karti phir fyda udana chati hai

[@alpha1442]

Very bad 👎 fasla 😥

[@ankurchaturvedi126]

Judge has committed suicide after reading your serious comment

[@yasha6931]

Wrong judgement

[@andrewcarnegie5342]

She didn't join the duty at that time as per her will, didn't do anything for 12 years and now want that job back 😂😂 She's not fit for the job, give the exam again if age limit hasn't been exceeded or go home 😂😂

[@ManishKumar-rp7bt]

Wrong judgement 😢

[@rishikumar-di4ce]

what's wrong in this judgement?

[@Abbey_786]

How can someone be sooo insensitive and rude.

[@raghavuchil2098]

who is insensitive and rude? verdict is delivered based on facts and that lady and her lawyer totally failed in submitting correct facts. Dont be an idiot. Judge is totally correect.

[@rupaksanyal1309]

@@raghavuchil2098 exactly

[@milindketkar9059]

Judge bhi ghatiya hai

[@ddnick]

Bilkul sahi kaha bhai

[@bighnarajsahu947]

Hamesha Har waqt lakho samashyaen hoti hai. Samadhan ka do rasten hain. 1-Ek ke baad dushre ki Samadhan kijiye, karte rahiye par kabhi khatm hi nahin hoga 2-Nyay ki stapana kijiye, ush ke baad Nyay sare samashyaon ka samadhan karega apne aap. 10000 Share kijiye aur samjhiye nyay ki sthapana ho gayi Nyaypalika ki pehli Neeti aur manab manobigyan 1-Metha-Ek bhi nirdosh muljim (jishne koyi aparadh nahin kiya)ko saza nahin honi chahiye 2-Bish- chahe 1000 apradhi ko chhodna pade ya phir 1000 fariyadi jindagi bhar anyay ki agni main jalte rahen marte Dum tak. Natija aparadh ka ssnkhya 10 Guna Teji se badhega, aur aparadh ki sankhya=saza ki sankhya kabhi nahin ho payegi 3-Halahal-Bhagwan Ram ki Tarah veer (jishne apni bibi/behen/maa/beti ke balatkari ka baddha Kiya hai)=Aparadhi( jishne kishi aur ki bibi ka apaharan Kiya hai). Natija aparadh ki sankhya 1000 Guna teji se badhega. Aparadh ki sankhya= saza ki sankhya nahin ho payegi. Nyan ki pehli Neeti- 1-Ek bhi nirdosh ko saja nahin honi chahiye 2- Har ek fariyadi ko nyay milega/Har ek doshi ko saja hogi 3-veer (jishne apne bibi/behen/maa/beti ke balatkari ka baddha kiya hai ya phir apni bibi ke ashiq ka Buddha kiya ha, Inam ka hakdaar hai)aur Aparadhi (jishne kishike bibi ka apaharan kiya hai, saja ke layak hai)ek Barabar nahin hain 4-Nyay milega Bina kishi mulya chukaye 5-Wo bhi 30 dino ke andar Aam janmanas ke liye koyi hai to upar bhagwan aur niche NYAY. Aur koyi nahin hai, kishipar bharosha maat karo. Loktantra--Purush Stree barabari--Nari Sashaktikaran--do byakti barabar Shakti, Adhikar, azadi ke sath, Eksath nahin reh sakte-Hindu bibah khand 1955--bibah bichhed- Hindu pariwaaron ka Anta, 498A, 125--Sishu Aparadhikaran-Nyaypalika ka byabsay badhna chahiye Ebook ke liye WhatsApp [phone]. Adobe Acrobat Aap Google play store se download kijiye, Ebook khulega Jjhhh hhhghh hhggffvv jhghhh

[@jaibharat2222]

Vah re judge sahib vakil ke haramipan ka inko nuksan kyo

[@moviespoint6722]

Ye sarkar ka dalla h judge h ,or case kiske khilaf sarkar ke 🤣

[@HariOm-gp5eg]

judge is blind head less

[@AnkitSinghAnarchoAtheist]

🤮🤮🤮🤮 Ghatiya Judge... Ghatiya Judgement

[@GauravSharma-je4rj]

oh bhai video me niche likh kar araha hai ki comment me galat likhne par contempt lag sakta hai

[@sibaprasadpradhan8227]

do you know you can be jailed for this comment on contempt of court .

[@HariOm-gp5eg]

wakil is best LIER and judges are blind

[@funmasti2942]

Budde judge isme iss lady ki kya galti h