Another Historic Year for the PLA Navy

Рет қаралды 8,077

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 60

@GulmoharBloom 7 ай бұрын

Thanks for the informative and clear overview of chinal naval buildup. Its difficult to find information that isnt overly biased towards one side or the other. Its a rare sight these days.

@jesusdiaz3776 3 ай бұрын

KZbin channel Eurasia Naval Insight. A lot of info about PLA Navy and others.

@Iamabot4708 2 ай бұрын

My favorite channel atm @@jesusdiaz3776

@learkingofalbion8520 7 ай бұрын

Thanks for this video. I watched it all.

@MRTY323 7 ай бұрын

America is a good teacher. And it seems like China is a great student.

@DM-mv4eq 7 ай бұрын

Give Damen and Indonesia some credit for that 10514 cameo!

@amunra5330 7 ай бұрын

I think China plans to build at MINIMUM 16 Type 055s -maybe up to 18.

@stevencher9968 7 ай бұрын

lt's 8x3 batches= 24

@EthanX1ao 7 ай бұрын

There are already 12, including 3 yet to be launched

@mochen9282 7 ай бұрын

I think that China definitely want to have more than 18 055-level ships. But in reality, China was slowing down building 055s after the first batch. China maybe planning for something more advanced. The recent stealth experimental frigate might give a hint.

@cx3264 2 ай бұрын

You cannot really blame Chinese for things you do. America engages with China because its own national interest not because America was a good-hearted Samaritan

@olderchin1558 7 ай бұрын

Seems like an honest clear evaluation. Just want to point out that China has 4 aircraft carrier, the one not mentioned is the Chinese mainland. When it goes down, it will be within range of mainland rocket force and its airforce. And also in waters controlled by Chinese sensors, mines and militia.

@sergevtorino 7 ай бұрын

Aircraft carrier = 1 hypersonic missile. The US government was always inefficient in their military expenditure. This is why it is collapsing.

@olderchin1558 7 ай бұрын

@@sergevtorino I would not underestimate the US or the US military. If the fight is in neutral grounds like South America or Micronesia, China won't stand a chance. And even the PLA thinks it will take 5-6 hypersonic missiles to disable or neutralize a US carrier, not sink it. Then again I don't think the PLA will want to sink it. A good sniper will cripple one soldier and then stay to take out the squad.

@sergevtorino 7 ай бұрын

@@olderchin1558 The topic is focusing on the Chinese sea. This is the region where the US will most likely confront China. Since, China does not seek world dominance and is not interested in imperialistic wars like the US government. Your assumption about the neutral ground is incorrect. Moreover, the warfare had changed dramatically since the 60s. Aircraft Carriers are relics of the past. 1 missile or drone strike will sink the multibillion dollar carrier with thousands of personnel aboard. Taking into account the proximity of the Chinese territory to the conflict zone (Taiwan Strait), the US has no chance of winning anything. This is the reality. Finally, The US is losing its dominance not just in military strength, but in financial strength too. It cannot just print money in order to recuperate the loses, since the world majority is moving towards dedollarization. Therefore, the US will become much more susceptible to financial struggle in the years ahead.

@olderchin1558 7 ай бұрын

@@sergevtorino I suggest you look up the video where the US use an decommissioned aircraft carrier as a target. That thing don't sink easily, the water tight compartments make the ship near unsinkable.

@sergevtorino 7 ай бұрын

@@olderchin1558 The reality is US does not posses the latest missiles of either Chinese or Russian origin; therefore, those tests are hypothesizing the unknown. Therefore, there is no need for me to see it. I am just being factual and objective. Even if the aircraft carrier is damaged it is a sitting duck near the shores of China. As I said earlier Carriers are symbols of superpowers of the days long gone...

@LHoover 7 ай бұрын

@Buzz they just made the Army a marine Expeditionary force. Long March.

@yemail5555 8 күн бұрын

Go, PLAN! 2025 would be even better, and looking forward for the reunification!🎉

@phil20_20 7 ай бұрын

What he said...!

@stefanratkiewicz 6 ай бұрын

Enjoyed the discussion and the insight but it seems that you forgot about Submarines and their importance in challenging the narrative.

@IrishCarney 4 ай бұрын

What language do the Russians and Chinese use to communicate with each other during their joint operations? Obviously NATO uses English, the Warsaw Pact used Russian, and before the Sino Soviet split the language there was Russian too. What now?

@Iamabot4708 2 ай бұрын

Maybe English it makes the most sense for me

@MrTylerStricker 3 ай бұрын

MOOCH sent me 🫡 great guest

@woodpecker6452 3 ай бұрын

Obama wiseass comments to mitt Romney in the the then presidential debate did not help the situation, he basically gutted shipbuilding

@picardtseng 6 ай бұрын

Shouldn't it be traced back to Franklin Roosevelt, George Marshall and Harry Truman's days that allowed the growing of CCP and the ultimate ceased of China, rather than just dating back to Nixon's watch?

@ivoallanty6722 4 ай бұрын

37:30 I cant believe this guy is thinking in these terms! no they are not trying to put the U.S. down! They are getting into their alliance for mutual defence and security!

@richwen8769 6 ай бұрын

China need to have naval power to keep american at bay and not interve with our re unification, the Chinese goal is not to destroy america as a nation or invade american continent

@dennisnguyen8105 7 ай бұрын

The USA is falling behind! We need to end welfare, stop school lunches, close public schools and public libraries. Increase our tax breaks to millionaires, subsidize more stadium and luxury condos, halt veterans benefits and in a blink of an eye will catch up and surpass the Chinese.

@jxie2618 7 ай бұрын

你不是想超过我们，你是想要美国的命🤣

@xye-NYC 7 ай бұрын

Appreciate the sarcasm.

@Iamabot4708 2 ай бұрын

@@xye-NYCthis guy's crazy America would have its next revolution

@xye-NYC 2 ай бұрын

@@Iamabot4708 Definition of sarcasm: "the use of irony to mock or convey contempt".

@cx3264 2 ай бұрын

America helped China build the Chinese navy. That sounds super arrogant and ignorant at the same time

@manuelmamann3398 6 ай бұрын

Dividing someone and feel this is a good thing? People some self awaerness? This is evil. The problem is that you need Dividing to exist. Become self sufficent and cooperate with people like family thats the solution. Your sociaty is mentaly sick.