DISMANTLING Atheists’ Top Objections to the Bible | Ken Ham

[@rosemorris8481]

When I was very young l realized there had to be someone way smarter than us, who created ALL THINGS EVERYWHERE. And l became a born-again Christian at 7 years old. Many moons ago. And l have NEVER regretted it. He's the best thing that ever happened in my life.

[@earthisasphere]

Man, they get them real young now. Kids have a hard time saying no to peer pressure... Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to form 13) the change in salinity levels would kill both freshwater and saltwater fish ,and on and on and on

[@jimhodge7257]

​​@@earthisasphereTroll somewhere else lol there was no need for your response to what she said. AIG addresses alot of what you brought up as proof, so you don't even know what you are arguing against, wow

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@rosemorris8481 you have to now explain who created this creator otherwise your realization makes no sense

[@PhilIsaak]

@@earthisasphereexactly they’re getting them young….drag queens reading stories to preschoolers because it’s wholesome and benefits society in so many ways At least with evolution we know thankfully LGBTQ will die out because it’s recessive genes that serve no purpose for the human race. Thank evolution the rainbow coalition will be short lived.

[@PhilIsaak]

@@fohrum4757exactly!!! We all know that insulin, testosterone, estrogen, progesterone, pregnenolone, adrenaline, left and right handed amino acids, DNA, RNA, cortisol, growth hormone, sex hormone binding globulin, thyroxine, melatonin, norepinephrine, dopamine, follicle stimulating hormone, glucagon, human chorionic gonadotropin, leptin, luteinizing hormone, prolactin, thyroid stimulating hormone, etc evolved simultaneously perfectly adapted to work synergistically vet millions of years but a rubber band and paper cup need a designer and maker…….are you sure you’ve thought this through?

[@rajeshinsights]

Thank you for the accurate teaching of God"s word. blessed....

[@roscowbrown3937]

refusing to prove Scripture isn’t accurately teaching it

[@rootedsu8022]

​@@roscowbrown3937human beings are unable to prove anything...

[@karinjansson8650]

May God Bless Ken Ham and reward him for sharing this Biblical Truth!!!! May we all share this message by sending the link to family and friends...

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@karinjansson8650 Please read an actual book about science if you want to learn, don’t just watch Christian videos telling you science is wrong

[@karinjansson8650]

@@roscowbrown3937 My dear, I read The Bible and from there base my Truth! No one is saying science is wrong... just that evolution is wrong! There are many Christian science that can be proved what The Bible teaches! So... please, read The Bible - not only books about science... then compare!

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@karinjansson8650if you’re saying that evolution isn’t science, that’s not a valid rebuttal to my criticism that you refuse to engage with actual science. Also, you’re telling me to compare a science book to a different book with magic stories, you can’t just take what I say and throw it back at me

[@karinjansson8650]

@@roscowbrown3937 I was NOT saying evolution isn't science - I simply rest my case on more trustworthy proof! Evolution is also based on "religion" - a world view with a belief-system without God. My world view is based on belief in God and the Word of God - The Bible! God says it - that settles it for me! Remember: "In science, repetition allows researchers to confirm or refute their hypotheses. It is a fundamental principle of the scientific method, requiring repeatable and reproducible experiments. By repeating an experiment, scientists can test the validity of their results and ensure that they are not a fluke or a random occurrence." THERE IS NO WAY YOU CAN DO "REPETITION RESEARCH" (WITH ACTUAL SCIENCE) ABOUT BILLION OF YEARS AGO... SO YOU HAVE TO PUT "FAITH" IN EVOLUTION... Let's just drop this "debate" and accept that we embrace different world views! There are believers and non-believers... we have free will to make our choices!

[@earthisasphere]

@@karinjansson8650 If you claim evolution is wrong, then you are saying science is wrong. ALL of biology is based on evolution

[@DiscipleofJesusChrist-t2p]

DNA seem to be held together by a series of sulfur bonds BETWEEN the base pairs (GCAT) that constitute your genetic code. And that these bonds are not randomly placed or evenly placed. But, there’s a sulfur bond, then 10 base pairs , then another sulfur bond, then 5 base pairs, another bond, then 6 base pairs, another bond, then 5 base pairs before the pattern repeats itself. 10-5-6-5-10-5-6-5-10-5-6-5… over and over, holding our DNA together. This means nothing to native English speakers, of course, because we use Latin letters and Arabic numerals. But Hebrew uses letters as their numbers. Aleph is both the first letter of the alephbet, and the first number. The number 10 is a Yohd. 5 is a He. 6 is a Vav (or Waw, if you have an Arabic dialect). 5 again is a He. 10-5-6-5, your DNA held together with God’s signature יהוה over and over.

[@richardgregory3684]

Human DNA does not contain sulphur, you're just cut/pasting soem crap you found on the net.

[@DiscipleofJesusChrist-t2p]

​@@richardgregory3684 You obviously are the one who is looking stuff up in Google without knowing much. No where in my comment it mentions that DNA contains sulfur. But rather that sulfur is part a bond-bridge that holds DNA together. Please read more carefully and you could learn a thing or two.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@DiscipleofJesusChrist-t2p _You obviously are the one who is looking stuff up in Google without knowing much. No where in my comment it mentions that DNA contains sulfur. But rather that sulfur is part a bond-bridge that holds DNA together_ How can sulphur play a part in holding DNA together is DNA contains no sulphur? lol. For your laughable claim to be true, there'd have to be sulphur there. There isn;t.

[@DiscipleofJesusChrist-t2p]

​​​@@richardgregory3684 While sulfur is not directly part of the nucleotide building blocks of DNA, it is considered necessary for DNA synthesis because certain enzymes involved in the process, like DNA polymerase delta, require an iron-sulfur cluster to function properly and maintain high fidelity during DNA replication; therefore, sulfur is indirectly required for DNA synthesis and crucial for DNA replication. In lemons terms: Most roads are made of asphalt, but most bridges are made of metal. Cars, trucks and busses drive on both roads and bridges. They are all made different and from different materials, but each one plays a role in the transportation system.

[@richardgregory3684]

@@DiscipleofJesusChrist-t2p Thanks for confirming DNA has no sulphur or sulphur bonds. So your claim remains untrue.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

Pardon me while I say with certainty: Psalm 139:14 I will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made; marvelous are Your works and that my soul knows very well. All 200 different types of the 37 trillion cells arranged in my body bearing witness to Him, the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. Ex 3:15

[@truthmatters7805]

Wow! I just posted that scripture to somebody that had lost their son by suicide last night. I was trying to comfort her with scripture and telling her about Jesus. Our son took his life in January. I don't know how anyone could take another breathe if they didn't know the Lord in this situation.

[@clivewells1736]

I am sorry for your losses, for both sets of parents, that is probably the hardest news to bear and I can only offer you my heartfelt condolences. Please don't blame yourselves - our world has been going madder since I was born but social media and Covid have ramped up the pressure and now the double speak, invasiogration, woke inclusivity has seemed to turn the natural order upside down. So, try and stay strong to support each other, I've seen chinks in the clouds but people have to come together to stop this madness. I am so sorry I have nothing but sympathy and love. Take care and God Bless you all. X

[@geraldshearon7264]

Thanks brother Ken for stepping in, and becoming the next hero up after the earlier modern great heros of the faith (like Henry Morris sr) left us for Jesus in His glory. His & Gish's work pulled me from the deepfake monolith of macro evolution, shined a light on it, which exposed it as full of holes. I learned it took more (& truly blind) faith to believe in time + chance = what we see around us. Henry Sr was a tool Jesus used to pry me away from evolutionary nonsense to the truth of my childhood faith in the Book of life. Thanks for stepping up, and working to remain faithful.

[@dinohall2595]

"Time + chance = everything" is an egregious oversimplification. Not every process is random chance because the laws of physics and chemistry are not random, nor is natural selection.

[@stevelawrence8352]

Thank God for Answers in Genesis and similar channels. You have most definitely opened my eyes to the truth of the Bible.

[@daviddavenport9350]

OH PULEEZE.....THIS IS HUCKSTERISM!

[@rayspeakmon2954]

​@@daviddavenport9350Then why are you here?

[@HiddenView1977]

That’s awesome. Keep seeking truth. Satan is the father of lies and has certainly deceived the world. Thank you Lord, please continue to bless and open Steve’s eyes! Amen.

[@wingednut2283]

@@rayspeakmon2954 throw it straight up

[@rayspeakmon2954]

@@wingednut2283 Throw THEM straight up. Try reading the whole comment the next time.

[@vigor4973]

This was a great watch. Thanks

[@I.no.ah.guy57]

Wow... This was an amazing video and made a lot of connections for me. So much information and truths that all connect together. Praise be to God.

[@rep3e4]

Awesome stuff, thanks

[@msicy2851]

What an excellent speech

[@wayneuynhan5624]

One very important thing atheist scientists ignore is ... after you have a complex DNA molecule formed by pure chance (miracle), how did it start to self-replicate or synthesise protein? DNA replication, RND synthesis, protein synthesis are processes that require specialised proteins called enzymes. Hence, you not only need DNA to be generated by random chance but also the associated specific enzymes (proteins) to also be in existence. All of it has to also be in a protective cell structure to prevent oxidation. For those who believe in the religion of evolution, they are really going on blind faith... no evidence at all.

[@michaelhoudecki3657]

It's pretty ridiculous when you add up all the things that would need to happen and be true for their fabricated version of history to be the truth. It's pretty obvious that the "everything exploded out of nothing, then became nearly infinitely more complex and ordered than it was" isn't even plausible. Just the first part...

[@DaveGreen-ft2vy]

So tell me again why people should believe the bible to be true?

[@wayneuynhan5624]

@DaveGreen-ft2vy well you will hear many testimonies from people who have placed their faith in Jesus Christ. And the only way you will know is if you take that step of faith and experience and encounter God yourself. All I have done is to help you dispell the false religion of evolution. Then you should naturally deduce that there had to be a creator, God, who crwated space, time and matter and everything in the universe which is so finely tuned. Now who that creator God is, is up to you to discover. God gives everyone a free will to choose. He wants a relationship with us but He will never impose in our free will. Hence, whoever chooses to reject Him, He will honour their choice. In the same way, those who wants a relationship with God, all they need to do is to place their faith in Jesus Christ and repent to receive the free gift of eternal life.

[@DaveGreen-ft2vy]

@wayneuynhan5624 "the only way you will know is if you take that step of faith and experience and encounter god yourself" So the only way to know is based completely on subjective experience? What about all the believers of other religions? Are their subjective experiences invalid? I'm assuming you've genuinely given those other religions a shot. So why are you a Christian and not a Zoroastrian?

[@wayneuynhan5624]

@DaveGreen-ft2vy well there can only be one truth. That is the essence of truth. The saying that all religion leads to God is false because they all contradict each other. Go ahead and study all the religions and you can decide for yourself which path leads to the truth. Jesus said in John 14:6: "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life. No one comes to the Father except through me." I hope you would study and seek the truth. When you finally seek Jesus, you will find Him...that is His promise. I understand how you may feel because I used to be a skeptical atheist myself and mocked people who believed in God. I am a science graduate and the more I learnt about biology, biochemistry etc, the easier it was for me to see the impossibility of macro-evolution and that nothing produced everything.

[@jyju66]

I am learning everyday. Thank you and Glory to God. The first death was indeed in Eden !

[@roscowbrown3937]

oh, go read a science textbook

[@jyju66]

@@roscowbrown3937 I am a scientist bro

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@jyju66 you’re a real scientist agreeing a video explaining why evolution is false… right… and I’m a pastor with a Ph.D in theology who encourages people to turn away from their faith

[@jyju66]

@@roscowbrown3937 Sorry, won't see you in heaven

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@jyju66 agreed, you can’t look at me inside of a place that doesn’t exist, apology accepted

[@RapunzelASMR]

I saw this in a dream about DNA. It said: the word of God , then zoomed in into a DNA strand seeing a sort of code in it,, like a sequence. And then showed that this was in everything, this sequence and this code.

[@nathandouglas624]

It's a unique song for each of everyone. From the same composer in the most beautiful symphony all made for us to see. But we just want everything and everyone to look at me. ❤

[@luish1498]

i think you are still dreaming because what you said just make sense in your dream

[@cosmictreason2242]

@@RapunzelASMR bot

[@cosmictreason2242]

@@RapunzelASMR report the bot

[@StevenHird]

Leave off the Cheese last thing at night 🤪

[@list1726]

Thanks for posting

[@mgadams4850]

Thank you Ken.

[@jimhodge7257]

Great knowledge here

[@krystal6612]

AMEN 🙏

[@MernFern73]

As Greg Koukl says, “The Big Bang needs a Big Banger.” God spoke and created the universe…the BG actually supports this. Atheism now looks to another explanation vs the BG.

[@Jofae]

Some Ken Ham in my day is always awesome.

[@daviddavenport9350]

Then you are easily sated......

[@rayspeakmon2954]

​@@daviddavenport9350Says the internet atheist troll!! 🤣🤣

[@sird4vy501]

​@@daviddavenport9350what do you mean sated? Atheists always diminishing who disagree with them. What a sad reality to be in. He just said he likes when he finds content from this man. Grow up.

[@HiddenView1977]

@@daviddavenport9350 why waste your time here?

[@rayspeakmon2954]

@@sird4vy501 That's the modus operandi of an Internet atheist troll. No substantial argument, so just attack the other person.

[@JesusSportsNature]

Thank you for the video. Great information!

[@TheOtiswood]

"You have to have the biggest God of all" Amen.

[@repentandliveholy]

Прекрасно!

[@RodericGurrola]

Good 👍🏻 video.

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@RodericGurrola Please read an actual book about science if you want to learn, don’t just watch Christian videos telling you science is wrong

[@jacob.tudragens]

@@roscowbrown3937 Science is not wrong! Scientists are!

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@jacob.tudragens Water isn’t wet! Wet things are! in all seriousness, What are they wrong about? What knowledge do you have that they don’t?

[@patrickc3419]

@@roscowbrown3937 I don’t quite follow…..why would you say “water is not wet”? Of course water is wet.

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@patrickc3419 for the same reason Jacob says that scientists are wrong

[@boni2786]

Great!

[@GeneGibbons9119]

Mountains turn to dust. Iron turns to rust.

[@DuranMediaSolutions]

Excellent

[@grege9862]

Everyone has faith (of some sort). It's the right kind of faith and the source of that faith that separates a believer from a non-believer. Eph 2.8-9

[@johnhammond6423]

Nope, your probably mixing up faith with a reasonable expectation based on logic and/or experience. Faith in a religious context is what you use when you don't have evidence.

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

Nonsense. Read and respond to johnhammond's comment above.

[@LarsLarson-u1x]

I don't have any faith. I may have trust or confidence in people, principles, or systems but absolutely ZERO faith in any religious or spiritual sense whatsoever.

[@vashmatrix5769]

Indeed. Evolutionism is a faith/ cult/ religious belief

[@apwill4765]

@@vashmatrix5769 no it's not. If you think faith is so bad why are you religious? Don't get me wrong, faith is bad I agree, but you really shouldn't think that...

[@Nancy-sd5pf]

I love the creation all MIGHT GOD MAD, but l love all Mighty God with all my heart soul and mind!!1

[@llllllblodllllll]

Prove it and I'll believe, everyone will. There are many books from many religions and it's a complete waste of time to read them all in order to argue with the inaccuracies. Burden of proof is on the one making the claim. It's very simple.

[@gmansard641]

At around 24:40 he mentions that the Bible is the origin for the 7 day week. Contrary to his claims, there is an astronomic basis for the importance of the number seven. If we presume an Earth-centered universe. . . which was unquestioned until about 500 years ago . . . we see a number of heavenly bodies moving independently of the fixed stars. Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn are all visible to the naked eye, and they add up to seven. The un-biblical Romans named them for their principal gods, along with the days of the week. This was observed by cultures around the world, hence the recurring mystic importance of the number seven.

[@michaelhoudecki3657]

Do you agree with the teachings in the bible, regarding morality?

[@llllllblodllllll]

@@michaelhoudecki3657 Many of them, but certainly not all. I think this is true of every religion. They survived for thousands of years for a reason, to pretend they have no wisdom to offer is a mistake far too many make. We are all new humans trying to find our way through this world, its sad to see people discounting the belief systems that got us this far, thinking we know better just because we know more. Do you agree with all of the moral teachings in the bible?

[@patrickc3419]

Sir, while I certainly don’t claim to know your spiritual backstory, you and I both know that if the Lord came back this very day, there are countless people who are so blinded by their sin, hate, and insanity they still would refuse to believe.

[@sandman9390]

@@llllllblodllllll Both the Theist & the Evolutionist rely on Faith. Those that cling to the religion of evolution rely on the material, but God is Spirit. Those without the Spirit can not "see" or know God (see 1 Corinthians 2:14 & also see John 6:63) Jesus said, "No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day." -John 6:44 So, whether you believe or not is not the responsibility of the Christian. It is their responsibility to tell you the Gospel. Whether you accept it or not is on you. "Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God. And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil."-Jesus, in John 3:18-19 "Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life; whoever does not obey the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him."-John 3:36 God offers forgiveness, reconciliation, & eternal life. The vast majority of people will reject this offer, because they would rather die in their sin, than to submit their will to The Sovereign Creator & Not because there is no evidence, just that they can not see it in their natural state. "And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. For what we proclaim is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as your servants for Jesus’ sake. For God, who said, “Let light shine out of darkness,” has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ."-2 Corinthians 4:3-6 "Again Jesus spoke to them, saying, “I am the light of the world. Whoever follows me will not walk in darkness, but will have the light of life."-John 8:12 If you want to find "evidence" of God, start reading the Gospel of John, 4th book of the NT. Perhaps God will open your eyes ❤️

[@teddyboy252]

My brother in law and sister were just at the ark they thought it was Great!

[@stevenbatke2475]

“I don’t know”, is still a far better answer than “it’s in this old book”.

[@georgewagner7787]

It's not better than It's un this book of great wisdom passed down reliably by dedícated men with evidence of a godly man raised from the dead Try reading it instead of making assumptions

[@stevenbatke2475]

@@georgewagner7787 I have read it. It’s possibly the most misunderstood book we have. Everyone has their own translation as to what it “really means”. No thanks.

[@justice8718]

I hate arrogant souls like you.

[@patrickc3419]

Do you know you don’t know?

[@stevenbatke2475]

@@patrickc3419 it’s knowing you don’t know, but more importantly, it’s admitting to yourself that you don’t really know.

[@vernoncleveland6806]

Amen

[@ketesafewyalefemedia2378]

One of the main reasons why we should believe in God is because, as humans, we don't not know and we don't have enough information about the universe and beyond. The only access to investigate the present universe or eternity is that we find the information in belief systems. When we believe in the living God, He reveals Himself and His universe to us. unless we believe in God, we can not reach the whole truth. Bless you, AIG ministry.

[@neplatnyudaj110]

That makes exactly zero sense.

[@richardgregory3684]

So rather than try to fill the gaps in our knowledge, just turn our brains off and say god did it?

[@Bill_Garthright]

_"as humans, we don't not know and we don't have enough information about the universe and beyond."_ Exactly! That's why, when we don't know something, we should just admit it. We don't have to stop looking, of course. But there's nothing wrong with "I don't know." Unfortunately for theists, "I don't know" doesn't mean "God done it." Throughout history, countless things that used to be thought supernatural have turned out to have a completely natural explanation, after all. That has never _once_ happened in reverse. So far, we are waiting for evidence that _anything_ "supernatural" actually exists in reality. But theists still have their imaginations. Now, _maybe_ a god exists. _Maybe_ it's even the specific god that you were taught to believe as a child. But the time to believe that is _after_ there's good evidence it's actually true.

[@vashmatrix5769]

1 Corinthians 1: 26-30

[@richardgregory3684]

@@vashmatrix5769 When in doubt, quote the bible. lol. I guess it spares you having to work your brain cells.

[@CanadianCookinginUSA_Eh]

Just returned home from visiting ❤❤. Amazing and life-changing experience thank you Ken for being obedient to your vision and ministry ❤❤

[@roscowbrown3937]

oh, go engage in science and actually try to learn something

[@EatLeadPal]

@@roscowbrown3937 Since you are such a great scientist, why don't you enlighten us and tell what scientific FACT proves evolution. I'm sure you know scientific fact must be reproducible and observable. We're waiting.....

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@EatLeadPal sure, no problem, the FACT that proves evolution is… [Read The Very Comment I Wrote Which You Responded To]

[@EatLeadPal]

@@roscowbrown3937 What? Your comment means nothing. I bet you didn't even watch Ken's video.

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@EatLeadPal and I bet you didn’t even read my first comment here before you responded to it

[@lukewoodard3189]

If I can look at a house and rationally conclude that someone made that house because there is clear design, How come I cannot look at the universe and have that exact same rationale? The second thing I want to say, is that if God doesn’t exist then why do atheist care so much to prove that he doesn’t exist? Sometimes they say it with such anger. If there is no ultimate standard above us, then it’s just your opinion, why do you guys care?

[@richardgregory3684]

_If I can look at a house and rationally conclude that someone made that house because there is clear design, How come I cannot look at the universe and have that exact same rationale_ Oh dear, the long debunked watchmaker argument? If the universe was built like a house, we should absolutely sue the architect and builders! _The second thing I want to say, is that if God doesn’t exist then why do atheist care so much to prove that he doesn’t exist? Sometimes they say it with such anger. If there is no ultimate standard above us, then it’s just your opinion, why do you guys care_ We mostly don;t. However, the problem comes with you guys spreading lies, misinformantion and propaganda to proselytise and of curse yu get into government and make laws around believing fairy tales from some book from the bronze age. I mean, if you want to believe in invisaible magic wizards that;s fine, if you keep it to yourself, But you don;t.

[@CoffeeCrazy]

@@richardgregory3684 That does not make sense as you would have to prove that. How can an atheist actually believe in lies if the don’t believe in truth. You create your own truth.

[@wingednut2283]

​@@CoffeeCrazy you need to clarify what he needs to prove. Also try proof reading your comments or else people wont understand your point of view.

[@sandman9390]

@@richardgregory3684 Yes. If you kept the myth of macro evolution to yourself, it would have saved millions of lives!....but when despots who believe there is no higher power than man/themselves & no consequences for their actions in this life, millions can die & have. The vast majority of people are lemmings & believe whatever propaganda the state & human powers that be wants them to believe. Evolution is just the godless religion created & endorsed by the "elite" to help control the masses. If their myth were true, then there is no higher power than the state😉

[@wingednut2283]

​@@sandman9390 science is just knowledge if you are afraid of that then no one can help you. We have social and societal consequences. What millions of people are you referring too and dont make this a contest because your side is the world champ of atrocity. Evolution is science silly argument. You are literally a part of a flock eg congregation 🤦

[@DelaneyCummins]

Love this but it was actually rosalind franklin with the dna structure.

[@roscowbrown3937]

you’re already promoting science denial so it shouldn’t matter to you who discovered the DNA structure if you think all scientists are Iiars

[@timothykeith1367]

I love Ken Ham! Keep after it. Todays skeptics have a stoney heart - they hate God. Atheism is magic without a magician

[@VisshanVis]

they hate God. Do you hate leprechauns, mermaids or unicorns?? like god you can't hate mythical beings that don't exist. Atheism is magic without a magician And what magic??? Atheists simply lack a belief in a god or deity how has that got anything to do with magic????

[@neplatnyudaj110]

Why hate something that doesn't exist?

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

You're simply WRONG. I am a skeptic, and I do not hate any particular god. Are you going to agree, disagree, or cower away?

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

​@neplatnyudaj110 Who _exactly_ hates something that doesn't _exist?_

[@Censoredbyyourcult]

No. Atheism is simply a lack of theism. Creationism is simply magic and magicians.

[@IAMhassentyou-w5m]

Amen AIG 🙏

[@sandman9390]

GOD is Spirit (John 4:24) Natural man, or those who are without the Spirit can not comprehend, or accept the things of God (1 Corinthians 2:14, John 3:3) Jesus said, "It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life."-John 6:63 The Apostle John wrote: In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men.-John 1:1-4 He also said: And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.-John 3:19-20....and that is why we reject God. Not because of science, but because man, by nature, devoid of the Spirit, is in rebellion against God & despises His Sovereign Authority😢

[@ron88303]

Hearsay. Not to mention there is ample evidence that John was not written by THE John.

[@sandman9390]

@@ron88303 🤣No there is not "ample evidence" against the Bible. You just believe what you choose to believe. 🤷🏻‍♂️ There are "...manuscripts, and there are roughly 6,000 surviving manuscripts for the New Testament alone. This makes it the best attested document of all ancient writings. The next closest contender is Homer’s The Iliad, which has only 600 existing copies." You believe anything you read in history that agrees with what you want to believe, even though most of what is written about ancient history was written hundreds, if not thousands of years after the fact. The New Testament records Eyewitness accounts of actual events that a corroborated by other historians of the time & archeology as well, but you put your faith in those who seek to Control you, rather than in The One that can set you free🥴 A lot of us were the same, before God, in Mercy & by HIS Grace, drew us to His Son.

[@sandman9390]

@@ron88303 There is not "ample evidence" against anything the Bible has recorded. There are people who oppose what is written in it, so they manipulate information to support their cause. There are more & older manuscripts of the Bible than any ancient "books" or writings. All the "Books" in the New Testament either were written by Eyewitnesses, or recorded the words & actions of eyewitnesses. Real Science "proves" that 100% of people die. It is observable, repeatable & mathematically probable 😉 And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment,-Heb.9:27 That "Judgement" part is what terrifies people, as it should. 👉It is a terrifying thing to fall into the hands of the living God.-Hebrews 10:31 👉for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,-Rom.3:23 For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.-Rom.6:23 👉 “If you abide in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.”-Jesus, in John 8:31-32 👉It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life.-Jesus, in John 6:63

[@ron88303]

@@sandman9390 Manuscripts that were copied or influenced by other manuscripts do not prove the total validity of the earlier. Especially when they are written with a specific intent. Tales reported by those recording eyewitness accounts of others is simply hearsay. What first person account exists for resurrection and ascension? Why were manuscripts that didn’t support the narrative not included? While I don’t doubt the Bible recounts kernels of some actual events, with varying degrees of embellishment. I have both admiration and sympathy for those that believe everything the bible says.

[@sandman9390]

@@ron88303 where? There is not any actual evidence, just conjecture. I encourage you to study Actual History & read about archeology, which has often confirmed the Bible, but never disproved anything written in it 😉

[@jyju66]

Excellent and eye opening

[@roscowbrown3937]

oh, go read a science textbook

[@Halo012]

Great Video.. God Exists.. Pray for those lost souls that believe in nothing

[@tobias4411]

A young earth (6,000-10,000 years old), is disproved by cave paintings, the domestication of dogs, ancient trees, stromatolites, lunar samples, and annual layers of ice and rock. Get educated.

[@michaelcrawford3796]

I'd really like to know how you know there's a place outside of time itself?

[@facterial]

“We found that DNA is not just matter, you know what DNA is? DNA is matter… literally just matter lol

[@WordMadeFlesh777]

Soooooo where did that matter come from and how did it become perfectly arranged to make and eyeball and human brain…

[@facterial]

@@WordMadeFlesh777 I don’t know where matter came from ultimately. Neither do you. As for the arrangement.. no laws of chemistry or physics have been demonstrated to have been broken in order to arrange the matter in that way, so there is no reason to assume something supernatural intervened to make the arrangement how it is. Just because something seems fantastic doesn’t mean it is. There’s always things we don’t know and literally every answer we have ever found about literally anything in the universe has had a natural explanation. You are claiming that because we don’t know how something happened it must be something unnatural. Just say we don’t know. Don’t place a god into the gaps of our knowledge because it makes for a good feeling. I don’t mean this to be rude I am genuinely asking but.. do you understand all that?

[@TheNatenator]

​@facterial Since the discovery of DNA, there has never been a documented case or even alleged case of matter having been observed arranging itself into genetic material. There's no evidence, outside of DNAs existence, that it ever happened. Because it never has happened, you cant quantify the odds of it ever happening let alone the odds of DNA forming in the presence of the exact conditions necessary for a bacterial cell to be emaculately conceived as a result. Applying the scientific method to the theory that it happened by random chance would inevitably yield the result that it didn't, i.e. the null hypothesis would be rejected. If you were to discover in the ground an electronic device full of little circuits and the abstract concepts of 1s and 0s that somehow manifested a moving image of a dog vomiting on a display, you would assume it was designed and produced by an intelligent being, not that it manifested itself through geological processes based on random chance. So we observe biological machines that can't be artificially replicated let alone naturally replicated through random chance that contain organized information that manifests itself in impossibly functional ways and we assume that the machine and the information it contains is the product of random chance. When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras. It seems to me that the blanket rejection of any form of intentionality behind the existence of organized biological information and its manifestation as life on earth is jumping to assuming zebras because someone somewhere arbitrarily decided that the idea of horses is just silly. If something cannot be observed to be possible, then believing it happened is called faith. Why is blind faith in the idea of random probability less silly than faith it was done intentionally?

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@WordMadeFlesh777Where the matter came from is irrelevant to the fact that This 👉 🧬 is still matter… furthermore, where did God come from? You’re gonna say he just always existed? Well, you may as well just use the same explanation for DNA, it’s just always been here

[@dennisstuhr9201]

Mr Ham Thank you for another great video each person has a choice. As for me and my house we will believe the Bible

[@cosmictreason2242]

The evidence for creation and AGAINST evolution is absolutely overwhelming.

[@luish1498]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@apwill4765]

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@billcook4768]

That’s not true. Also, please understand that evolution and creation are not in conflict.

[@TheSaintFrenzy]

@@luish1498 laugh all you want but wolf like creatures didn’t morph into whales and dinosaurs didn’t turn into birds.

[@wingednut2283]

​@@TheSaintFrenzy morph? You mean evolve over time.

[@matthewmattson7584]

Hot Dogs have “all things”! 🤣😆🤣

[@robertl.6919]

Makes sense. Noah gathered 13 million animals, including dinosaurs and other carnivors on the ark, did feed them for over 2 months, provided enough meat he took from we don't where and that is it. Simple.

[@JonathanS.-in8zi]

Hi there. Creation scientists believe in what’s called micro-evolution. You probably already know what I’m talking about, but it’s small changes within a type of animal group. Therefore because the Bible specifically reads 2 of each kind, it’s completely reasonable to have all the variations of animals today from approximately 8,000 different kinds of creatures that were on the ark. I honestly do care about you and definitely don’t want to argue. I suspect there’s very little chance that I could sway your belief regardless of what my answer would be. Likewise, there is zero chance you could sway mine. I get it. Like all walks of life, there can be annoying people that rub you the wrong way. That can hold true for Christians too. Believe me, I know. That being said, I love my annoying brothers and sisters. I really do. Honestly, I used to identify as an atheist. I was raised in the church and was wounded deeply by it in my late teens. I no longer believed in a loving God. Eventually I drifted to a point where I didn’t even like Christians. Then about 16 years later I read a book called “More Than A Carpenter” by Josh McDowell. It’s a great book on historical apologetics, which is simply systematically laying out evidence in support of Christianity. I do have a scientific and mathematically inclined mind. I aced those courses in college. That being said, I didn’t know at the time after reading the book how all the puzzle pieces would fit together; However I did know, through historical apologetics that Jesus is the real deal. Without question, He is the Messiah! My salvation experience was mind blowing. Honestly I could write a book on it. Then shortly after, I discovered scientific apologetics. There are excellent arguments that have been laid out in support of Christianity and demonstrate serious flaws in the evolution theory. I have a library full of them. You typically don’t hear anyone from the mainstream scientific community addressing them either. The arguments do have merit, so scoffing at them and dismissing them is not an appropriate response. Especially if the scientific community considers themselves to be kind, caring people. Why is that? I know why. Anyway, like I said before, I don’t want to argue with you. So I won’t. I hope I didn’t come across like a jerk. I don’t want to be that guy. I suspect you’re an alright person, and if we bumped into each other we’d probably hit it off... I like to make the analogy of an elementary school band performing a loved classical number. They may butcher it, though Beethoven or Mozart were still great. That’s what we as humans in the church sometimes do. That doesn’t mean Jesus isn’t still who He is. I hope my response was helpful and didn’t cause the divide to become worse. You definitely matter to me. I’d like to challenge you to read the book I mentioned and dig deep into the Christian faith to seek the truth. Take care my friend. Sincerely, Jonathan

[@earthisasphere]

​@@JonathanS.-in8zi Gonna post it, even if it doesn't change you mind. At least maybe it will let you see how ridiculous you are being. Noahs flood is geologically impossible. 1) The sodium carbonate needed for even a small single layer of limestone requires centuries or more of build up of shelled creatures and coral. When explaining the Grand Canyon, in your model, that isn't possible. In the actual model we know that the southwest U.S. was once a shallow seabed, so the sodium bicarbonate could build up over time. 2) The limestone in the G. C. also requires calm, shallow waters to form, like.... a shallow seabed. Not the most violent storm the earth would have ever seen. The hydraulic sorting claim YEC's like to peddle doesn't work either, because the water is still to deep and to volatile. 3) There are multiple places where layers of salt are separated by layers of rock. Sea's would have to evaporate, have a layer (or layers) of rock form, and then the area would have to become a sea bed again. A flood can't explain this. 4) Unconformities don't have the time needed to happen on a 6,000 year old earth. 5) The following were rulers of their respected kingdoms during the flood timelime Egypt- Pepi, Akkad - Sargon, Elam - Helu, and the Indus Valley Civ had been around for 1,000 years and continued for another 1,000 years 5) fossils and stratification layers of rock match predictions of evolution 6) Sand dunes don't have time to form 7) certain layers of rock would require forest fires to exists underwater 8) the amount of energy released during such an event would destroy the earth, also know as the heat problem 9) the mud problem 10) Ocean basins have less than a km of sedimentary rock on top, while the continental shelves are over 12 km think with sedimentary rock, a flood of that magnitude and length would have eroded away much more of the continental shelves 11) We have studied the growth rate of coral form a very long time now, and it doesn't grow fast enough to match your timeline - forget a flood, 6,000 years isn't even enough time. Look into the Eniwetok atoll if you want more info 12) evaporates and shales take too long to form 13) the change in salinity levels would kill both freshwater and saltwater fish ,and on and on and on

[@LeonSemiPro]

​@JonathanS.-in8zi Super fast microevolution of kinds suddenly stopped as soon as humans described nature in art and writing. Doesn't sound silly to you?

[@robertl.6919]

@JonathanS.-in8zi Oh now there is evolution in the process ? Micro or macro it's still evolution. And starting with 8000 " kinds " which is not a real name or word in biology , can't end up producing 6,5 SPECIES. I suggest you search for these definitions...

[@freddiefreihofer7716]

@@JonathanS.-in8zi You are saying in effect that from the 2-of-every-kind animals in the Ark, hugely accelerated speciation occurred since c. 2,500 BC (the Institute for Creation Science date) and gave us our animal species today. Why then has this warp-speed speciation ceased? Only miracles, not physical science, can explain the event in Genesis and thereafter.

[@2245908765]

Exactly, the world is not millions of years old. According to the Bible, if you pay attention to the verses, it's only about 6,000 years old.

[@roscowbrown3937]

that’s what one book says, but others say different so how do you pick and choose what book to believe

[@justice8718]

@@roscowbrown3937 The Bible is composed of 66 books!

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@justice8718 there’s an Old Testament, there’s a New Testament, What are the other 64?

[@justice8718]

@@roscowbrown3937 How would the books of the Torah, King David, and King Solomon even have the same authors?

[@roscowbrown3937]

@@justice8718 compositions have multiple authors all the time… there are songs, books, movies that can be written by as much as 7 people… but this is kinda separate from how many books is Scripture comprised of?

[@Warknux]

4:05 Also to your point. There would be no intention or intelligent design behind the words and sentences. The vast majority would just be be random and meaningless.

[@kerrief3414]

There are NOT many different species of dogs. All dogs are th ONE species. There are different breeds. I'm a Christian, and i applaud your arguments but if you're going to defend the faith get your facts right for goodness sake, otherwisewe look stupid I'm sorry.

[@Censoredbyyourcult]

''Otherwise look stupid'' That's what they do, sadly. Get everything wrong, then pretend they're right and then slap some scriptures on there and preach about how bad the world is and how good you are for believing.

[@vashmatrix5769]

Canis familiaris is one species of what he was calling the dog kind. Look at the graph he showed. He said 34 species, not hundreds like breeds.

[@JohnW-gz4db]

Dogs are one FAMILY with many different kinds within th family.even biologists differ on divisions. Point dogs STAY dog kind, horses STAY horses, cats STAY cats.

[@JohnW-gz4db]

​@@Censoredbyyourcultyou don't have to pretend when you can present evidence. And Man's nature hasn't changed- including scoffrers like you.

[@macgreystone3397]

This is hard to watch with all the editing that was applied.

[@MrsPin1954]

And stop being so ungrateful. It's free!!!!!

[@timer570]

I think the b-roll and diagrams were all relevant and smooth. I'm not sure why you'd think that the editing is bad 🤔

[@macgreystone3397]

@@timer570 I was referring to the removal of all the dead air between sentences to make the presentation shorter. For me it would have been better just to air the presentation as it was recorded without chopping it all up. BTW - I'm a long time subscriber to this channel because I like the content.

[@timer570]

@macgreystone3397 oh, I see what you mean. Honestly, I agree with you now that you pointed that out.

[@noahosucha2295]

I’ll also add this to the discussion: Take it up with the empty tomb. The historical resurrection. No argument against the resurrection has ever honestly held weight. The resurrection verifies all of the Bible as truth, since Jesus verified it and God verified His sinlessness and deity by the resurrection. The empty tomb proves God’s existence, proves Christianity’s claim of exclusivity, and verifies its truth as a whole. There is abundant Biblical and extra-Biblical evidence supporting the resurrection. Let it be your basis for every judgment about the Bible and how your claims stack up to the Bible. It verifies even the hard-to-believe things. Every hard question can be reconciled with theology and the Spirit granting you eyes to see.

[@richardgregory3684]

The "resurrection" is a myth. We know corpses don;t come back to life. Any claim they do requires more than empty claims made by anonymous authors who were not even witnesses in some book from thousands of years ago, stories which contradict each other and disagree about important details, which weren;t even written until many years later. _There is abundant Biblical and extra-Biblical evidence supporting the resurrection_ Well we can ignore the idea that the bible verifies the bible. What non-biblical evidence do you think you have?

[@earthisasphere]

Except that you can't prove the resurrection...

[@tobias4411]

An empty tomb do not have to involve supernatural events; the body of Jesus might have been moved or never placed in the tomb initially. This could be due to logistical reasons or misunderstandings about the burial location. Even if the empty tomb is acknowledged, it does not necessarily imply a resurrection, natural explanations exist but are unknown due to insufficient evidence, akin to other historical mysteries where supernatural explanations were later debunked. Alternatively, an empty tomb narrative might have been used as a literary device, common in ancient stories, to convey themes of apotheosis or divine intervention. This suggests that the story served a symbolic purpose rather than being a literal historical account.

[@richardgregory3684]

There is no evidence of the "resurrection" outside of a story in the bible. You are saying the bible verifies the bible. lol. The Gospels were written many years later, the later three are clearly embellished retellings of the earliest. The authors are anonymous. They are not eyewitness accounts - none of the Gospels claim to be so. They disagree on fundamental details. The most liely explanantion is, therefore, that they are just myths. And even if there was an "empty tomb" the most lilely explanation is that it was faked. There is more evidence that Emperor Vespasian could work miracle healings, or that Julius Causar ascended to heaven after he died. Both are recorded by known and reputable historians.

[@justice8718]

@@earthisasphere But we literally have the Shroud of Turin.

[@llllllblodllllll]

Matthew 19:24 "And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God." Ken Ham net worth ~ 50 million dollars.

[@spicyroads]

Ever time humans solve a mystery it’s never a god

[@JohnW-gz4db]

Well you statement is basically true but falls short of true explanation that God works through his creation and " natural " laws. Science was invented to explain and discove and better understand r how God uses his creation. The Sciences were founded by Christians.

[@wataboutya9310]

The one that I so far think is the most difficult to explain or grasp with any type of reality is in Judges 15:14-16 were Samson kills 1000 Philistines with the jawbone of a donkey. I know he had supernatural strength but a thousand is a lot of people .

[@TickedOffPriest]

So many more people need to hear this.

[@tstoddart5540]

Such nonsense. He certainly can't prove how the animals that are exclusive to Australia (or elsewhere) made it there after the Ark landed in that ridiculous Ark story. Believe in the nonsense if you want to, but do not listen to this guy. He is just making things up.

[@earthisasphere]

They try, but the Wallace line DESTROYS all their stupid claims about it.

[@justice8718]

Then explain to me why the entire world believed in a flood so mighty, only a ship can be able to survive it.

[@tstoddart5540]

@@justice8718 So you think no one else had boats? Okay.

[@justice8718]

@@tstoddart5540 They clearly didn’t have one that could withstand the flood.

[@tstoddart5540]

@@justice8718 Believers in this pile of nonsense are more than ridiculous.

[@matthewmattson7584]

❤❤❤

[@wingednut2283]

"Where does matter come from?" Scientists: "we dont know.... yet" Creationists: "we know the bible tells us and those guys over there say it came from nowhere" Thought lying was a sin

[@ericharrison8950]

Fortunately for you Jesus loves trolls too! Jesus loves you. If you don't like that take it up with Him.

[@theshawnmccown]

Lie. They do not claim that they do not know. A simple google search turn up all kinds of claims of where matter comes from. And like typical naturalists, they don't state that they don't know or that this is just a theory at best, but present it as fact in all the articles that come up. Lies through omission that they don't know and it's faith on how they interpret data that leads them to believe that they will find the proof to back their claim. It's not that at the root of it all, they only have theories, it's that they always present it like it's fact and that they have faith more evidence will prove it. They state it as if it's fact, because if they admit it's faith based then they have to admit atheism is a religion. And since they have pushed for legislation that religion can't be taught in public schools, they would have to remove the teaching of evolution or accept creation into schools as another theory. Nice try though. You know good and well they don't claim to "not know". They claim to know and are sure the proof will come in time.

[@wingednut2283]

@@ericharrison8950 are you talking about the fictional troll or internet trolls can be confusing with what you guys believe? Also i cant talk to your imaginary friend.

[@CoffeeCrazy]

I think you have misunderstood. No where in the Bible does it state matter came nowhere. That is what Atheist say. The Bible say matter was created by God. Now which makes more sense? Never mind don’t answer that because I don’t think most Atheists will be honest.

[@theshawnmccown]

Lie. They do not claim that they do not know. A simple google search turn up all kinds of claims of where matter comes from. And like typical naturalists, they don't state that they don't know or that this is just a theory at best, but present it as fact in all the articles that come up. Lies through omission that they don't know and it's faith on how they interpret data that leads them to believe that they will find the proof to back their claim.

[@juanito714ok]

When scientists have agreed there are at least 7 unobservable dimensions and 95% of the universe is also comprised of unobservable matter and energy and are confident to rule out The Creator, it was foretold in The Bible.

[@earthisasphere]

Wow, people who were not taken seriously thousands of years ago predicted they wouldn't be taken seriously in the future. Shocking...

[@massimotarantini5826]

1. DNA is not information, is not a language. Information is abstract, comes from the Latin verb 'informatio' and its meaning is 'shape the mind' or 'teaching' or 'discipline'. When we say 'the DNA contains information' we try to explain with a human concept what the DNA molecule does. It's a way to explain that is able to stimulate the formation of a being, the way organs work and what they do. I'm not a biologist so I will not explain how it works, but one thing I can say: there is no language, no programming code, no sign of an intelligent design (DNA is good but can be corrupted and that's very bad, not very 'intelligent'). 2. From two wolves, or two cats or whatever animal you chose, in less then 2000 years, because of the 'genetic information' (?) a vast variety of species developed. Interesting. So two wolves started walking on a deserted Earth, arrive in a place, they look around and say 'hey, honey, in order to survive here we should be a little different, we should be smaller, and brown, and eat small animals. Let's have a puppy and call it Foxy, OK?'. And you say that evolutionist have a blind faith? 3. From what we know from historical evidence (FACTS), the seven days week originated in Babylon where a moon calendar was used. The moon has four phases (new moon, crescent moon, full moon, waning moon), each phase is about 7 days long (just a small fraction longer), giving a 29.5 days month. The origin of the week is observation, not creation. 4. Carbon dating can be used to date organic material up to 50,000 years old. That's why we must date the rock layer where organic material is buried if older than 50,000 year. There is no contradiction in the dating of the Crinum mine in Australia. The trees were buried by a lava flow 45 million of years ago. As easy as that. Religious books (all religious books, not only the Bible) are not scientific books, use them for moral dissertations if you want (but first erase all murders, genocides, incest, crimes against people etc.), not for science.

[@gusolsthoorn1002]

All of your objections have been considered and answered in the web site of AIG, as well as Creation Ministries International and the Institute of Creation Research. Those who follow this channel realize this and are probably far better educated as to those answers. It appears you have just encountered this kind of teaching and are reacting based on what you have previously been taught but I can assure you that many have dealt with these very same issues, to a lot great extent than what Ken Ham could cover in this brief overview. Keep asking your question but be gracious enough to consider the answers.

[@massimotarantini5826]

@@gusolsthoorn1002 My questions were not answered on the AIG site or any other creationist site. I watch the videos and the more I watch, the more I am convinced that creationism is incorrect. Twisted facts, half truth, inconsistent conclusions, you name it. Are they liars? Not at all, they have a blind faith , I respect them for this, but this make them blind also to reality. But I have an open mind, creationists are not my enemies, I listen to them and I would really like them to say something provable, but every time the facts contradict them. The only proof they bring is “the Bible says so, therefore it is true.” (spoiler: the Bible contains good messages but also horrible things and is full of mistakes. Just like any other religious book)

[@vashmatrix5769]

Spelling BAT would also mean a 1 in 72 chance you're even looking at them all in the right direction & order.

[@Bill_Garthright]

You didn't really think that silly story actually happened, did you? Or that it makes _any_ sense at all? I mean, that's not even _close_ to how evolution works. It's one of the dumbest - and most obviously false - stories I've ever heard.

[@vashmatrix5769]

@@Bill_Garthright Plenty of teachers have used that example, but you can think what you want. Evolutionism doesn't work at all. It's just a fairytale for people who reject God.

[@vashmatrix5769]

@@Bill_Garthright Plenty of teachers have used that example, but you can think what you want. Evolutionism doesn't work at all. It's just a fairytale.

[@vashmatrix5769]

@@Bill_Garthright Plenty of teachers have used that example, but you can think what you want. Evolutionism doesn't work at all.

[@vashmatrix5769]

@@Bill_Garthright Plenty of teachers have used that example, but think what you want. Evolutionism doesn't work at all.

[@JoeHarkinsHimself]

This is the wrong argument about the wrong question. If there is no verifiable evidence for the existence of a god, what does it matter if there is a collection of ancient writings that claim god as their source? Do you have verifiable evidence for the existence of a god? PREDICTION: you will argue the question or reject the question or totally ignore the question, but you will never offer an simple yes or no and you will never offer any verifiable evidence for the existence of a god.

[@SW33D]

Well, we do got the shroud of turin, which from what I know, hasn't been debunked. Also, God is not about evidence, Hes about faith. The Bible says that nothing pleases God but faith. So obviously He is going to let science seem convincing, Because He isn't about sight, but faith. Also you can not logically tell me that nothing created everything, I mean how? Are you seriously going to look me in the face and tell me that nothing created the universe? isn't the chances for the universe literally impossible? from what I have searched, the chances of life, universe, etc, is impossible. So you make a multiverse theory which is obviously just a theory, and not only that, but because earth is the only habitable planet in the universe, somehow aliens exist, and God doesn't. Basically, the evidence for God is simply logic.

[@JoeHarkinsHimself]

@@SW33D First if all, thank you for fulfilling my predication. It never fails. Yes, the shroud has been debunked, but even if it hadn't what does it have to do with verifiable evidence of a god? At best it is something you cannot explain. But it stops there. It is not evidence of anything other than itself. You say, "Also, God is not about evidence, Hes about faith." that comment is what is known as begging the question. Again, you just fulfilled my prediction. Thank you. And finally, you present a muddle of failed arguments for the existence of a god. Arguments are called arguments because they are argument. They are not evidence. Good job.

[@tomvela77]

Hello there Joe, Yes. I used to chase that same question until I read that God gave us creation for all the proof we would ever need in Romans 1:20 KJV, as He knew that we would be a creative species, made in His image, born into Adam's. It should make sense to us that a Creator exists just by looking around at the contents of the Earth. Just because we present other ideas to how all life came to be does not disprove a Creator. It just offers another choice. I found myself wondering if I could find verifiable evidence that God does not exist. I still have yet to find this evidence. I do however clearly observe evidence of a Creator in life all around me that is not perfect and eventually dies. Other then that, the only other verifiable proof is personal and unique to each born again Christian. What I and so many others can tell you is that the proof we really needed came after getting saved. You chose Jesus Christ and He will give you what you're looking for. What I have learned is that God wants us to accept Him by faith, just like how we accept other ideas in the world. We have the choice to either choose Him or not. In Genesis 2:17 God tells Adam that if he ate of the tree of knowledge of good and evil the result of his sin (disobedience) would be death. The Bible also calls out we have two major issues when we are born into Adam's image, sin and death (Romans 5:14 KJV). That is pretty concerning verifiable evidence to me. Would you agree every person to ever walk this earth has faced these two primary issues of sin (Call it what you want, nobody is perfect) and death? What would you consider verifiable proof to you? Have a great week!

[@JoeHarkinsHimself]

@@tomvela77 Congratulations on fulfilling my prediction. I am no longer surprised at how totally predictable responses like yours are. I've come to accept that you are unable to help yourselves. Great job of making my point that you have no verifiable evidence for the existence of a god.

[@intentionally-blank]

What evidence or valid rationale convinced you that any particular non-theistic worldview is true?

[@20yrsfarming]

I’m an atheist and I’ve never had a problem with the bible. I would have a problem with it if it was true.

[@georgewagner7787]

After you die you will need to know the truth about if it's true. Read it

[@kevlark3184]

Anyone that believes in the evolution religion never took 5 minutes to look at the current scientific findings.

[@wingednut2283]

What makes you think evolution is a religion? Tell me about what you think the current scientific findings mean and what those findings are?

[@rayspeakmon2954]

Leftwingednut has no life. No woman, no real job. Only his narcissistic desire to tear down people of faith for whatever reason. He trolls all of these Christian videos. Need I say more?

[@wingednut2283]

@@rayspeakmon2954 cool story I ask questions in these videos if you consider that trolling i feel genuinely concerned for you.

[@rayspeakmon2954]

@@wingednut2283 You always have the same answers..... nonsensical!! And once again the comments I make to you are not visible to me. Somehow they get deleted. You always get answers to your silly questions, you don't like them, and then you move on to the next question.

[@HiddenView1977]

Or worse .. knowing it requires faith to believe in evolution, because it’s not observable .. and still claiming, it doesn’t require faith to believe in it. Majority of the world that “believes” in evolution hasn’t even bothered to actually research it. They just accept the lies pushed onto them by “Scientists”.

[@evergreentree8042]

Is that book from Werner Gitt a translation? If so, does anyone know the original title in German?

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

I vow to answer each and every straightforward question concerning my rational position of atheism or any of my stated convictions DIRECTLY. Is there ANY theist willing to vow the SAME? If so, I will allow you to ask as many questions as desired. My only requests are that you 1) ask your questions one at a time (one per comment) until I have a chance to answer, and 2) that you refrain from asking leading or loaded (complex) questions. After you have asked all the questions you desire, all I ask is that you answer my straightforward questions in the same DIRECT manner. Is there any theist willing to do so?

[@beestoe993]

Not really. By your conditions you could simply state that anything you cannot answer falls under category 2. Which = nothingburger. For example, can you explain abiogenesis? Obviously the answer is no, and yet you will insist that yours is the "rational position" on the issue. Whats the point?

[@luish1498]

@@beestoe993 Abiogenesis proposes that the first life-forms generated were very simple and through a gradual process became increasingly complex. «you will insist that yours is the "rational position" on the issue. Whats the point?» a rational explanation is better than a irrational explanation

[@beestoe993]

@@luish1498 Sorry, but that is not a scientific conclusion, it is noting more than conjecture. And it is not abiogenesis that "proposes", it is your belief. Have I said something that you consider to be irrational?

[@luish1498]

@@beestoe993 The evidence seems to suggest that all life on Earth has developed from a single organism. Have I said something that you consider to be irrational? «Obviously the answer is no« the answer is yes. the best explanation for life origin is abiogenesis.

[@beestoe993]

@@luish1498 No, the answer is still no. You cannot explain how abiogenesis "worked", all you can offer is opinion and theory. I can do that much just as easily. Observe. Life from non life requires consciousness. You can observe and study a mud puddle your entire life and I assure you there will be no life that pops up out of it from non life. That would be an exercise in futility and an IRRATIONAL waste of time. Never in the history of man has an example of abiogenesis ever been observed. That is a fact. Consciousness on the other hand is demonstrably real and a viable means to explain life from non life. So here we have two different views. Believe whatever you want, but do not try to tell me that you have science on your side and I do not, or that my views are "irrational" and yours are not. That would be an absolute lie.

[@philipbuckley759]

the broken record....with all this information, at hand the ability to not believe, in creation, has to be the biggest mystery, of all...

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

Identify one EVIDENTIARY FACT that demonstrates ANYTHING has ever been created. State this EVIDENTIARY FACT in a complete sentence. Let's see if you response, if you even provide one, is simply ONE sentence.

[@justice8718]

@@Theo_Skeptomai It’s everywhere. Videogames are the only medium that can truly create worlds.

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

@@justice8718 The worlds that computer games create are not _realities._ I know of no realities that have been created.

[@justice8718]

@@Theo_Skeptomai Your denial is strong, but the physics are still physics, the worlds are still worlds, and the models are still models. And as we can see, we couldn’t create them with RNG.

[@shelhawke7206]

It's not the bible I disagree with, it's Ken Hams interpretation of it I disagree with.

[@JonathanS.-in8zi]

The Bible is historically accurate and should be taken literally. It’s the infallible word of God! The day age, and gap theory are garbage. Also, along with whatever other evolutionarily theory you want to throw in there. If you want to try and marry the Bible and evolution together, please explain to me how organic evolution took place? Obviously, that’s a rhetorical question. You can’t, it’s mathematically impossible. Where are all the missing links for macro-evolution? There are none. There was no death before sin. Death entered into the picture after Adam and Eve sinned against God. There weren’t any fossils in the ground before that. I can assure you that fossils don’t take that long to create. I accidentally made one once while doing some landscaping. I dug a large hole and while doing that, I buried a mushroom. Years later when I was using some of the dirt, viola, I had a fossilized mushroom! Also, why do you think God created the trees and all the plants before He created the sun? I think in His omniscient ways, He was aware of the ridiculous arguments that would attempt to undermine the Bible. Creation scientists are not intellectual dummies. They are brilliant and honest at the same time. Everyone has a biased nature. To claim creation scientists are looking at everything in a biased way, and that evolutionary scientists aren’t is flawed thinking. Evolutionary scientists are more biased. Anyway, I could go on for hours shooting holes in evolution. Though Ken Ham is much better at doing it, just watch more of his videos. I’m passionate about the subject because I grew up in the church and asked the questions about cave men and dinosaurs. I received ridiculous answers. Then when I got older and life became difficult and painful, I no longer believed in a loving God. I turned my back on God for almost two decades. Eventually I opened up my heart and gave it to Jesus after reading a book called “More Than a Carpenter” by Josh McDowell. I was saved and have been passionate about apologetics ever since. Telling any young person that there is no issue between evolution and the Bible is a terrible idea! After all, are you aware of what Jesus said in Matthew 18:6? I don’t want that for you or anyone. Neither does Jesus. He died for you and me to settle our debt. I care about you, and if I came across a little harsh, I apologize. Take care.

[@tobias4411]

What "kind" of animal is a platypus?

[@RedfishThatICaughtIsMyPfp]

Monotreme

[@tobias4411]

@@RedfishThatICaughtIsMyPfp I have now got four (!) different answers from creationists, what a "kind" is in the scientific taxonomic classification: 1. Kind is Class. 2. Kind is Species. 3. Kind is Family. 5. Kind is Order. You say that platypus is Monotremata, I agree. And Monotremata is Order. So you're saying that the Bible term "kinds" referring to order. You don't realize this doesn't work? Monotremata includes only five species of egg-laying mammals. The order Carnivora encompasses carnivorous mammals such as bears, cats, and dogs. If order is kind, according to what you say, that means bears, cats, and dogs are the same "kind" of animal. And best of all, Order Primates includes humans, apes, monkeys, and related species. So you just confirm that you accept evolution, yes humans are apes. It seems that Christians struggling to accurate define "kind" to the scientific taxonomic classification. What a mess. Also, Cottontail rabbits and European rabbits - are they the same "kind"? I think most creationists would say yes, only problem - they can't interbreed...😳

[@luish1498]

@@tobias4411 «Cottontail rabbits and European rabbits cant interbreed but......... but....... they are still rabbits» what the creationists will say.

[@tobias4411]

​​​​@@luish1498 Most creationists say that same kind include animals that that can interbreed. I remember a debate when Hovind said that. Also, we know without a doubt that cats are domesticated since ~9,500 years ago, and dogs are domesticated since ~30,000 years ago. 🐺 🐕 🐩

[@luish1498]

@@tobias4411 easy, i agree with you i have the same «problem». read my post again: «what the creationists will say.»

[@hongotedesco8931]

"How do we defend that there's a god"? You can't. All you can say is "we can't explain it, therefore god did it". But that's not good enough. The correct answer for things we can't explain is......wait for it..........we can't explain it. How long have we been doing science? About 200 years? What if we're around for another billion years? Yeah...stay tuned.

[@DNW2023]

Don't wait too long Hongo! The clock is ticking, and when you leave your body here, it will be to late to seek God and his word. The only way to the eternal life our creator meant for us is through Jesus. I pray you find him.

[@earthisasphere]

@@DNW2023 Stop it. If there is a god, the odds that it is the one you worship is slim to none. And the odds the "laws" you obey are the ones you should be obeying is even lower.

[@hongotedesco8931]

@@DNW2023 Oh the clock is ticking alright, but that's all. There's nothing after death. And you know, if god really wanted to have a personal relationship with us, then I invite him for coffee in my kitchen tomorrow. We could have a nice chat. But that's not happening is it?

[@bwtv147]

Remember what scared God. God said "If they eat the fruit of the tree of life they will become as us." God said " If they build a tower to heaven nothing they imagine can be denied to them."

[@justice8718]

That’s because look at humanity right now.

[@Mark-h2s]

He's always just so.. wrong.. he can't even get the basics right when he tries to talk about science. 'scientists say the Big Bang has been proven'. No. No, scientists don't say the Big Bang has been 'proven'. I'm willing to bet there's not a single young Earth creationist in this comment section who can even define the Big Bang model. I'm talking about just a basic description, of course, not looking for the math and all that stuff. Most of them think it was a literal explosion, like a bomb detonating with a bunch of matter flying out from a central point. This is because they don't look past anything but the name, big 'bang'. Most of them probably think it is an atheist concept, not realizing that a Christian physicist first came up with the idea of what he called the primeval atom. I know for a fact that many young Earth creationists also don't realize that a lot of atheists were opposed to the concept because it implies the universe has a beginning rather than existing eternally. They probably also don't realize that the Big Bang model does not describe the very beginning of the observable universe, it only describes what occurred after. They probably aren't aware of the significance of the cosmic microwave background and other data and evidence supporting the model. They are also not aware of the fact that scientists know that there are problems with the Big Bang model, just as there are with many scientific models.

[@intentionally-blank]

"[The] big bang picture is too firmly grounded in data from every area to be proved invalid in its general features." Lawrence Krauss ~ Ph.D. in physics "The Big Bang theory is a well-established scientific explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe, and it is considered a theory. In scientific terminology, a theory is a well-substantiated explanation for a set of phenomena, based on a large body of evidence and testing. The Big Bang theory is supported by a vast amount of observational evidence from many fields of science, including astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology." ~Groq The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) states on its website: "The Big Bang theory is the leading explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe, based on a wide range of observational evidence from many fields of science." (Source: NASA, "The Big Bang Theory") The American Astronomical Society (AAS) states on its website: "The Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe, based on a large body of observational evidence from many fields of astronomy and astrophysics." (Source: AAS, "The Big Bang Theory") See the thing is: hypothesis, theory conjecture, guess ... ever evolving scientism avoids any god thinking. The scientism method itself excludes an immaterial realm. However, I now read the priests of scientism are (once again) changing their minds. I mean seriously how did it even get this much traction since 1922? We have documentation. We have the best explanation.

[@earthisasphere]

@@intentionally-blank Go tell your doctor to use methods and medicines from 200 years ago. Why in the world would anyone want to work with the most recent data and most recent evidence?

[@VisshanVis]

@@intentionally-blank See the thing is: hypothesis, theory conjecture, guess ... ever evolving scientism avoids any god thinking. Because it has nothing to do with a god, there is no god, mankind has made up and invented around 18,000 gods deities and religions in the last 250,000 years since modern man has evolved, do you know how much evidence there is for any of the 18,000+ gods including the Christian god NONE WHATSOEVER.

[@earthisasphere]

@@VisshanVis He is just another YEC who doesn't know what a scientific theory is. Why am I not surprised? He needs to look up and compare the definitions of a scientific theory and a scientific law. They are BOTH the highest level of approval you can get in science...

[@justice8718]

@@earthisasphere Your arrogance will be great to see in the lake.

[@jimpassi349]

well i guess we have to wait till the end time end of days to see whos right // there will be no ooops

[@keyjam9]

Ham the scam

[@JonathanS.-in8zi]

The Bible is historically accurate and should be taken literally. It’s the infallible word of God! The day age, and gap theory are garbage. Also, along with whatever other evolutionarily theory you want to throw in there. If you want to try and marry the Bible and evolution together, please explain to me how organic evolution took place? Obviously, that’s a rhetorical question. You can’t, it’s mathematically impossible. Where are all the missing links for macro-evolution? There are none. There was no death before sin. Death entered into the picture after Adam and Eve sinned against God. There weren’t any fossils in the ground before that. I can assure you that fossils don’t take that long to create. I accidentally made one once while doing some landscaping. I dug a large hole and while doing that, I buried a mushroom. Years later when I was using some of the dirt, viola, I had a fossilized mushroom! Also, why do you think God created the trees and all the plants before He created the sun? I think in His omniscient ways, He was aware of the ridiculous arguments that would attempt to undermine the Bible. Creation scientists are not intellectual dummies. They are brilliant and honest at the same time. Everyone has a biased nature. To claim creation scientists are looking at everything in a biased way, and that evolutionary scientists aren’t is flawed thinking. Evolutionary scientists are more biased. Anyway, I could go on for hours shooting holes in evolution. Though Ken Ham is much better at doing it, just watch more of his videos. I’m passionate about the subject because I grew up in the church and asked the questions about cave men and dinosaurs. I received ridiculous answers. Then when I got older and life became difficult and painful, I no longer believed in a loving God. I turned my back on God for almost two decades. Eventually I opened up my heart and gave it to Jesus after reading a book called “More Than a Carpenter” by Josh McDowell. I was saved and have been passionate about apologetics ever since. Telling any young person that there is no issue between evolution and the Bible is a terrible idea! After all, are you aware of what Jesus said in Matthew 18:6? I don’t want that for you or anyone. Neither does Jesus. He died for you and me to settle our debt. I care about you, and if I came across a little harsh, I apologize. Take care.

[@earthisasphere]

@@JonathanS.-in8zi Infallible? Two different books had versus add at least 200 yrs after the original manuscripts were written. It get's the value of Pi wrong, it calls a bat a bird. The gospels contradict each other on when the women see Jesus after the resurrection. And that doesn't even scratch the surface. Stop lying.

[@intentionally-blank]

@@earthisasphere Have you actually read of all these yourself or just repeating from an Ehrman list?

[@earthisasphere]

@@intentionally-blank Read all of what? I have read the Bible cover to cover many times. I was raised a YEC. I have studied it's history and the sciences as well. I can't read Greek or Hebrew if that is what you are getting at, but even Christian scholars agree those versus were added later on. I assume that is what you are talking about. Everything else I mentioned is mentioned directly as stated in the Bible.

[@intentionally-blank]

@@earthisasphere I'm not disputing irregularities. You mentioned many there. The dispute might be what is actually infallible. Here's video you might find on your level: Video = 5Cc2fKnYq4 and tDCj_LOtls0

[@rosemorris8481]

God is a supernatural being. There's NOTHING my God cannot do.

[@richardgregory3684]

So why does he fail so often? Why do his plans never work out? And why does he sit and watch so many evils that he could prevent?

[@tobias4411]

If your God exist, he must be a horrible designer. There will be a lot of "nothingness". The Andromeda Galaxy is on a direct collision course with our galaxy, the Milky Way. You can see it coming; we have an appointment in about 4.5 billion years. It's going to crash right into ours. Both galaxies will be completely reshaped. Whose design is that? Before this collision occurs, we need not worry much about it because the Sun is expected to swell into a red giant in about 5 billion years. Our oceans will boil, life on this planet will become extinct, and then the Sun will collapse into itself. Millions of other stars will implode, explode, and shoot themselves to death all over the sky. There will be a lot of "nothingness"! For those who claim credit for the existence of something, which deity will claim credit for the "nothingness"?

[@katamas832]

Can he create a rock so heavy he cannot lift it?

[@VisshanVis]

There's NOTHING my God cannot do. Why then didn't your god step in to stop the murder of 6 million + people in the nazi gas chambers in WW2, why then does your god allow little babies to be born with horrible diseases and disabilities, why then didn't your god stop pedophile priests and pastors from sexually abusing children ??? , why then doesn't your god not stop children from starving or being forced to work just to survive??.

[@billjohnson9472]

15:05 it is easy to debate science from 200 years ago. one can give a similar talk about medicine or physics from that same time period. unfortunately for Mr. Ham science in all these areas has progressed tremendously and he isn't keeping up.

[@TimothyChapman]

Note: Animal blood only COVERS sin (that's what the words wrongly translated as "atonement" actually mean). The blood of Jesus takes away our sin, but NOT by Jesus paying the penalty that we should be paying (that is unjust according to God himself). Also, human beings do NOT have souls. Human beings ARE souls. The word for "soul" literally means "breathing creature". So yes, animals are souls too. Besides that, that's not what the "image of God" means. It means we are made to look like God. Also, souls don't live forever. They die with the body and must be physically raised from the dead to live anywhere for any amount of time.

[@billcook4768]

There is no conflict between the Bible and science. There is only conflict between science and insisting that parts of the Bible must be taken literally.

[@cybersquaregaming]

The Bible and Science do not conflict. It some thing people get from science and the bible.

[@EasternOrthodoxChristianity]

😂🤦🏻‍♂️

[@mhughes1160]

You are correct. There is no conflict between the Bible and science The problem is scientists interpretation of what the science shows They interpret it to their own destruction And let God be true and every man a liar .

[@luish1498]

«There is no conflict between the Bible and science.» There is no conflict between the stork story and ginecology/obstetrics.

[@fiddleronthebike]

There is no conflict between science and the Bible taken literally - there is only a conflict between the Bible and theories pretending to be science though not being consistent with scientific evidence

[@billb3673]

Two of each kind. INCLUDING ALL OF THE RACES..

[@JamesRichardWiley]

Sorry Ken, You can't "dismantle" a lack of belief in myths by restating the myths.

[@chessassassin2813]

Thank you for thi wonderful post. Very factual and scientific. Thanks, very well articulated. I wish I could give you 2 likes. 👍

[@RealHooksy]

You need to get a different tool kit Ken. You haven’t dismantled anything yet 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@HonestlyCurious-bp4gv]

“DNA is not just matter. … It’s an information system.” That’s like calling the periodic table of elements letters in a language. The letters of the alphabet are our system for representing words/ideas in human minds. As Ken Ham points out, the alphabet is only meaningful if you already know the language of the words. DNA doesn’t need anyone to know how to read it. Life doesn’t “read” DNA, it is part of the chemical process that life on earth uses. The only “reading” that happens to DNA is humans creating letters to represent the molecular structures of DNA. And, unlike language, it isn’t an interpreted language, it is just a description of how things work; Language represents ideas; DNA (as described) is simply the description of the molecule.

[@aidsend6352]

evolution is a very real thing, you guys always like to bring up "transitional fossils" and how they "don't exist". To anyone reading this comment who does not believe in evolution please look up "transitional fossils of humans" and you will see as clear as day the evolution of our race it is very fascinating and I would encourage people to do their research on evolution.

[@beestoe993]

What caused the Dinosuars to go extinct?

[@luish1498]

@@beestoe993 an asteroid impact was the main culprit.

[@beestoe993]

@@luish1498 THAT is inconsistent with the rest of the millions of years rubbish that has been crammed down the throats of virtually every human being on the planet. If the layers of strata in the Geological column represent millions of years, and Dinosaurs are found through millions of years worth of layers, how could a single event in time possibly be responsible for their demise? And this is where the manufactured, circular logic comes in. I love the way the Evolutionists never feel compelled to point out the fact that marine fossils are found throughout the ENTIRE geologic column. Hmm. Manufactured rubbish. That is what the Darwinian Cult and Evolution brings. Bucket loads of conjecture masquerading as FACT.

[@joycewoods109]

Transitional organisms would have to be at the exact same transition in order to reproduce. It's nearly impossible.

[@VisshanVis]

@@beestoe993 the millions of years rubbish that has been crammed down the throats Uranium-235 has a half-life of 700 million years, and uranium-238 has a half-life of 4.5 billion years, half-life refers to how long it takes for half of the element to degrade or decay by looking at how far along these elements have decayed it is very easy to determine exactly how old they are both of theses elements decay into lead so it is very easy to prove that the Earth is in fact billions of years old.

[@jimster7277]

Someone dial 911. There is a fire in this man's pants.

[@Pay-It_Forward]

*The most selfless, accepting, unconditional loving religion today is Atheistic Secular Humanitarianism.*

[@scooterliberty4217]

So is my relationship with my Lord Jesus Christ!

[@222ableVelo]

Lol wow, I feel sorry for you man. If you really think secular Atheism leads to selflessness, acceptance, and unconditional love......... you clearly haven't studied history. Even very recent history. What a statement. Just look at World War II my dude, and study some of their leaders. As well as their beliefs and systems.

[@wingednut2283]

​@@222ableVelothe nazis leaders chanted Christian songs and had the cross on their uniform. Dunbest argument ever.

[@wingednut2283]

​​@@222ableVelo your religion still to do this day approves of beating slaves but go on tell me how being an atheist has led to bad things??

[@beestoe993]

Check the History of Marxism, get a wake up call. The aim of Marx AND Darwin was to destroy faith in God. How is that "Accepting"? How is that "Loving"? You are delusional.

[@RicoLikes2Talk]

how can you differentiate words in the bible that are written in english? how can it be God's word if it wasn't translated into english until centuries after it was written?

[@beestoe993]

How does when it was translated make it somehow less relevant?

[@RicoLikes2Talk]

@beestoe993 he was going on and on about the word 'kind'. 2 Kinds of animals on the arc. he said the word choice was very significant. The Bible was written in Greek and Hebrew first. God didn't use the word 'kind' because that is an English word. Whatever the word used in the original Bible was....wasn't 'kind'....so why does he make it so important?

[@beestoe993]

@@RicoLikes2Talk I see what you are saying. He just believes that far too many people for far too long have poo pooed the actual words in the Bible and as a result you now have "believers" trying to meld the Bible with the millions and billions of years nonsense and even trying to incorporate things like homosexuality into the Church. If you have seen Exodus patterns of evidence then you saw what a certain rabbi thinks, he doesnt even believe in the Bible, thinks it is nothing but myths! It is lunacy, that is no Rabbi. So I don't blame Dr Ham for his position, but I do think he tries to read things into it that just aren't there. For instance, I dont believe there were Dinosaurs on the ark, it makes no sense. But he simply wants to take the Bible literally. Peace.

[@davidpiot8098]

Demonstrable evidence for a god = 0.0000

[@mikegrassman4511]

Billy Carson would run circles round u boy

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

God doesn't need DNA. God doesn't need anything. The God that can "speak" the universe into existence doesn't need to make sense. In fact, if God does need to correspond to some plan, that means God is not omnipotent. God doesn't need a " fine-tuned" universe, doesn't need any genetics, in fact doesn't need anything to accomplish whatever God wants to accomplish. All of this "evidence" you point to really is just a reflection of your own lack of faith.

[@BE_WERM]

Well now, you’ve got a colorful way of looking at things, I’ll give you that. But let’s dive into this a bit, shall we? You’re right God doesn’t need DNA to explain His creation. He doesn’t need anything to accomplish His will. But let’s not confuse what God doesn’t need with what He chooses to use. God’s omnipotence doesn’t mean He’s boundless in a chaotic sense; it means He’s all powerful, but also purposeful. He chose a specific way to create life, and DNA is part of that. It’s not a limitation on Him; it’s a reflection of His intricate design. See, DNA is like a language-a code-written with such precision that it blows the mind. Think about this: within every cell in your body, there’s a blueprint that determines what makes you, you. That’s not random. DNA is information, and information always points to intelligence. Codes don’t write themselves, and they don’t just randomly appear. If you walked into a room and saw words neatly written on a page, you wouldn’t assume the ink just spilled that way, right? No, you’d know someone put it there intentionally. DNA’s complexity points not just to a Creator, but to a Creator who is beyond brilliant. It’s like He’s saying, “I’ve woven My wisdom and power into every fiber of your being.” God, in His omnipotence, could’ve created us any way He wanted, but He chose DNA as part of His masterpiece. The fact that He did it with such complexity, beauty, and order speaks volumes about His character. Now, you say God doesn’t need a plan or a fine-tuned universe and sure, He could’ve made things differently. But He didn’t. He chose to create a universe that’s finely tuned for life. That’s not a reflection of a lack of power, but rather a testament to His care and intentionality. The precision of the universe, the laws of physics, the genetic code, it all works together in perfect harmony. Why? Because God is a God of order, not chaos. He’s not randomly throwing things into existence; He’s crafting a universe that reflects His glory, His wisdom, and His love for us. And here’s the thing about faith it’s not blind. God doesn’t ask us to check our brains at the door. He’s given us minds to think, to reason, and yes, to see His handiwork in the world around us. Romans 1:20 says that since the creation of the world, God’s invisible qualities-His eternal power and divine nature-have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made. In other words, creation itself is shouting, “There’s a Creator!” But here’s where we get down to it: none of this is about DNA, or fine tuning, or even our ability to comprehend the universe. It’s about the heart of the Gospel, the good news that Jesus Christ came to save us. God’s creation is one way He reveals Himself to us, but His ultimate revelation is in Jesus. Through Christ, we don’t just get a glimpse of God’s power; we get to know His love, His grace, and His plan for our redemption. That’s what it’s all about. So, don’t get bogged down in whether God needs anything. Instead, focus on what God chose to do. He chose to create a universe that points to Him. He chose to design you with purpose. And most importantly, He chose to send His Son, Jesus, to rescue you and bring you back to Him. That’s the evidence of God’s love and power-the kind that not only creates life but also redeems it.

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

​@BE_WERM Have you ever _directly observed_ this 'God'?

[@BE_WERM]

@@Theo_Skeptomai you’ve hit me with the classic question! “Have you ever observed this ‘God’?” It’s like asking me if I’ve ever seen the wind. No, I haven’t seen the wind, but I’ve sure felt its power, watched it bend trees, and known when it’s been blowing through my life. Same thing with God. Can’t see Him directly, but the evidence of His work? Oh, that’s all around us, like fingerprints left on everything He touches. Take DNA for instance, it’s like God’s signature written in the code of life. You ever really thought about that? DNA isn’t just a bunch of random molecules bumping into each other and forming you by accident. It’s a code-a language made up of four letters (A, T, C, G) that somehow tells your cells how to build your body. A language like that doesn’t just come from nowhere. Languages need writers, and codes need coders. So, what do we have here? We’ve got a masterpiece of design that’s got the touch of a Master behind it. Look at it like this: you’ve got DNA, a code so complex, we’re still trying to figure out all its layers. Now, if I handed you a book full of intricate code, you wouldn’t think it just wrote itself, would you? You’d know someone with some serious smarts sat down and put that together. Same thing with DNA. That’s God’s handiwork right there, and it’s more than just some vague idea, it’s a blueprint of life itself. But here’s where it gets real interesting: DNA isn’t just about mechanics and molecules. It’s about purpose. Just like God crafted the physical world with precision, He designed us with a spiritual purpose. He didn’t just stop at the science; He gave us a soul, something deeper than any code. And you know what that soul craves? It craves Him. That’s why we’re restless, searching for meaning in everything from relationships to careers to philosophies. That hole in our hearts can only be filled by the One who made us. So, back to your question, have I observed God? Every time I see a newborn baby, I see God. Every time I watch the stars and galaxies spin in perfect order, I see God. And every time I look at the cross, I see God in His most loving form, pouring Himself out for us through Jesus Christ. The real question isn’t whether I’ve seen God; it’s whether you’re willing to see Him. Because He’s been revealing Himself in every sunrise, in the complexity of DNA, and in the whisper of your own heart. And the pinnacle of that revelation? Jesus Christ. God Himself stepped into time and space, not just to show us His power, but to save us from the mess we’ve made. So if you’re looking for direct observation, you won’t find God in a petri dish. But you will find Him in the intricate design of life and in the sacrificial love of Jesus. He’s not a distant Creator, He’s a loving Father, calling you to see the truth of His creation and the even greater truth of His salvation plan. That’s the Gospel, my friend. You were made with purpose, you were loved enough to be redeemed, and you’re invited into a relationship with the God

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

@@BE_WERM Was that a "yes" or a "no"?

[@throckmortensnivel2850]

@@BE_WERM I'm sorry you have such a lack of faith, but not surprised. Two points. DNA is not a blueprint. If it was all organisms would be clones of themselves. But organisms do change over timeThe genetic structure of organisms changes over time. That is foundational to evolution. Information: Depending on how you define information, everything is information. A rock is information. Dust is information. In fact everything in the universe is information. All of it is random.

[@Yashua2Rule]

God is not looking for your best formula, God is waiting for you to establish a relationship

[@Bill_Garthright]

*Evidence?*

[@Species1732]

One thing I found illogical about Christianity is, in the Bible it says people knew God before Jesus was born so they knew of Genesis and God at the time that people spread out over the world (tower of Babel). How come people like American indigenous Indians, Australian Aboriginals, the different tribes in Africa, etc. didn't have any trace of Genesis and God in their stories of the past. They had to be told by the missionaries otherwise today they would still be ignorant of this. By the way this also applies to other religions. It just doesn;t make sense.

[@ChewyChicken589]

It's because those people are from the Fallen Angels

[@richardgregory3684]

Of course it doesn't, it's religion.

[@Species1732]

@@ChewyChicken589 Where in the Bible does it say that those people are from the Fallen Angels or are you just making that up?

[@ChewyChicken589]

@@Species1732 and to answer the original question in your comments, they don't have accounts of Noah's flood because the flood was not worldwide. The translators took a Hebrew word that just generally means land and translated it as earth. It really says the flood covered that land which was in Northwestern China on the Tibetan plateau

[@wingednut2283]

​@@ChewyChicken589 "if you look hard enough" just drink the coolaide man "you just gotta believe". Does it say adam and eve were white that also does not make sense.

[@v1e1r1g1e1]

When someone asks me to ''prove'' that there is a God, I ask them to first establish; ''What do you mean by 'proof'?''

[@Theo_Skeptomai]

When someone mentions this 'God', I ask them simple straightforward questions, which he or she will avoid answering DIRECTLY. May I demonstrate this to you?

[@roscowbrown3937]

they are asking what convinced you that He is real

[@unionjoe8245]

this guy is nuts

[@222ableVelo]

How so?

[@alwinengelbrecht3012]

i suppose you don't believe in the God of the 6 day creation.

[@apwill4765]

Do you think he knows zillion isn't actually a number 😂

[@grammystanley8736]

​@@apwill4765of course he knows. It was a figure of speech the same as if you or I were to use it.

[@apwill4765]

@@grammystanley8736 weird cause he said billions, then trillions. Those aren't figures of speech those are numbers. Then in the same breath he said it's actually zillions. I think he thinks billions trillions and zillions all are numbers.

[@ernestoamador2481]

If God is a God of love and order.,why he allows so many religions to contradict each other and as time goes on,more religions appear.

[@tanjiro5856]

Because we have free will to choose what we want to follow. We can follow Him (John 14:6) or we can reject Him. He doesn't force Himself on us, but He knocks on the door of your heart if you want Him, open it, but you have the choice not to open the door of your heart (Revelation 3:20).

[@elmercoblentz9432]

Faith can move mountains, and,,,, make an axe float. But doubt requires the largest event possible in this earth. Oh! The irony!

[@luish1498]

science takes you to the moon . religion takes you to the WTC

[@elmercoblentz9432]

@@luish1498 Exactly! Religion celebrates their perfection after they celebrate the failures, demise and death of fellow man. To them, death is a failure of life.

[@luish1498]

​@@elmercoblentz9432 religion makes you doing bad things because you believe that they are the right things to do.

[@CoffeeCrazy]

@@luish1498 what is wtc? That’s the issue. To believe in God is not a religion. Now religion stems from a belief in some deity and to some that could be the god of self. So that could mean you could actually have a religion as well. It is an Atheist who fights against Christians because it is their religion. Why not Hinduism, Etc? Because deep down you know that the truth .

[@luish1498]

@@CoffeeCrazy «wtc« is world trade center. «Why not Hinduism, Etc?« because is not the hindus and etc that try making law to shoving their religion down other people's throats. so i believing in myself is a religion now?

[@lencline]

Why are you, and most other content producers, compelled to blast the background noise (you may call it music) over the speaker's voice? I want to hear what he has to say, clearly, without the nagging fight to separate the distracting background noise. People with kids will understand. Please--if the speaker wants drama, sadness, excitement and emotions, let him do it with his voice and content.

[@Lysporster]

God said we're created from dust. Was dust which is Earth here first or Monkey?

[@friisteching3433]

So if I said we're created from hydrogen. Hydrogen was here before dust. Does that mean I am correct?