Is Genesis History? - Watch the Full Film

𝘐𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺? is a documentary series that reveals how science intersects with the Bible. In over a hundred videos, scientists and scholars explore the evidence for creation in six normal days, a real Adam and Eve, a global Flood, a tower of Babel, plus hundreds of other fascinating aspects of God’s creation. Dr. Del Tackett serves as your guide in this amazing series that has impacted millions of people worldwide.
1 - Changing Our Perspective 0:00
2 - What do the Rocks Tell us? 3:59
3 - A Question of Paradigms 13:49
4 - What Does the Text Say? 17:55
5 - How do you Measure Time? 23:32
6 - A Brief History of the World 34:13
7 - The Origin of Fossils 42:26
8 - When Dinosaurs Walked the Earth 50:14
9 - Soft Tissue in Dinosaur Bones 55:51
10 - The Genius of Design 1:02:58
11 - The Potential of Created Kinds 1:12:34
12 - The Purpose of the Stars 1:21:22
13 - Where was Babel? 1:28:03
14 - Genesis and Our Culture 1:33:19
15 - A Changed Perspective 1:39:09
16 - Credits 1:41:26
- - - - - - - - - - -
If you want to purchase a copy of the film and our entire library of creation-affirming content, check out the 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦𝘵𝘦 𝘊𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘉𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘭𝘦 at our website! You can do so by clicking here: bit.ly/2A7Pd2Z.
Don't forget to check out our web store for 15+ hours of videos, books and other resources as well: bit.ly/2A7Pd2Z
- - - - - - - - - - -
Also, be sure to browse around our channel. There, you can find videos from our 𝘉𝘦𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘥 𝘐𝘴 𝘎𝘦𝘯𝘦𝘴𝘪𝘴 𝘏𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘺? series, as well as in-depth technical lectures given by creation scientists.
- - - - - - - - - - -
To find out how you can support our ministry, click the link here:
isgenesishistory.com/donate
- - - - - - - - - - -
Finally, if you prefer to read articles with a curated video collection, we have lots of free resources at our website: bit.ly/3idgpi7
We hope you enjoy the film!
- - - - - - - - - - -
"For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse." Romans 1:20
- - - - - - - - - - -
Note: The film includes subtitles in English, French, Dutch, Spanish, German, Icelandic, Indonesian, Italian, Chinese (Simplified & Traditional), Portuguese, Portuguese (Brazilian), Arabic and Bulgarian.
----------------------------------------------------
✨ Looking to learn more about Genesis and Creation?
🦕 Visit our blog for helpful articles: bit.ly/3d306R1
🍃 Free Videos: bit.ly/3e1HRgc
🌌 Questions & Answers: bit.ly/3d0EG6T

[@gingerhalo]

I love that we can watch the entire documentary for free. This is how the academic world is supposed to function - the free exchange of ideas, honest scientific inquiry, and the search for knowledge.

[@flybylightmedia]

100% agree. Got to laugh at a “scientific” community that is incapable of admitting their pet theory has long since outlived any plausible hope of support by physical evidence. 😂 God bless their darling hearts…

[@GilGTG]

I love that misinformation is free.

[@michaelg377]

@@GilGTG Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *time* puddles of chemicals can fizz into people? This information isn't free, it's funded by tax payers and force fed to us for "free", and we are all uncritically indoctrinated into this atheistic origins mythology as young children. It's even in our cartoons and children's stories.

[@megan1010ify]

I plan on purchasing the documentary on DVD. Nothing is free. It wasn't free for these people to make this film. People deserve to be paid for their work and their knowledge, which can take decades to acquire. We should be willing to pay for their expertise.

[@seankennedy1377]

Hear! Hear!

[@williamelliott]

My wife and I have a small 10 acre farm. We grow many fruits and vegetables and flowers. There is no way that someone with eyes and an open mind not be able to see the hand of GOD in all the beauty and complexity of life whether plant or animal. Each plant has a relationship with the bugs and the roots of such plants with the bacteria in the soil. I could go on for hours but I'll just cut it short and say thank you my heavenly Father and to GOD be the glory.

[@markvonwisco7369]

Those various organisms have a symbiotic relationship because they co-evolved with one another over millions of years. No god needed at all to explain how nature functions.

[@josh2388]

William Elliott Why did you capitalize GOD? Similar to IN GOD WE TRUST on dollar bill? Get back to your lodge...

[@firecloud77]

"We are surrounded by a world of incredible complexity, and beauty actually. And everything about the living world screams design. If you look at the way a body works, look at the way a body of any animal or any plant works -- it's clearly designed, you might think." --Richard Dawkins

[@williamelliott]

@@josh2388 the one true GOD. Creater of all things deserves capitals.

[@stanstevens6289]

@Rebecca P Yeah, like the Corona virus.

[@conduit68]

This is a MUST watch for all world views. From "Creationism" to "Evolutionism", and all in between. Absolutely packed with fabulous information. There's something for everyone here in this documentary. Incredible world we live in... Shalom shalom.

[@billybob4274]

Well, no. Most of the info is incorrect, from using a testing method on Mt St Helens that was not supposed to be used for anything younger than 2 million years old, which these people did, to comparing erosion in 2 different places with 2 different materials. It is much easier and quicker for ash to erode than it is for rock. But with the Shalom, you are cousins of Christianity and Judaism. Yes, we DO live in an incredible world, one that was not created by any god.

[@Lightgiver23]

Thank you for putting out this beautiful film and for FREE! Glory be to God, God bless.

[@billybob4274]

Glory be to God, for all the enslaving, the rapes, the murders, the starvation, the cancers.... Need I go on?

[@terrymeadows1827]

@@billybob4274 LOL I hope there are no sharp instruments in your home.

[@debbielewis3986]

Couldn't get to sleep & found this last night. I really loved it! So many scientific people explaining it. Now if i could just get some others to take a look at this explanation rather than just listening to the popular view point.

[@mountainhours4443]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Oh boy! I hate to be the bearer of bad news Nicholas but here is Evidence for young Earth; Most dating methods gives a young world. Helium in atmosphere, Helium in ground, Meteor dust, Buildup of carbon 14, Human population, Natural plutonium, Sodium in sea, Sediment in sea, Erosion of continents, Earth's magnetic field, Oil leaks in earth, Natural gas in earth, Orphan radiohalos, Decay of rock magnetism, Tight bends in rocks, Coral reef growth, Oldest living plants, Human civilizations, River delta growth, Undersea oil seepage, Uranium in sea, Rotation of spiral galaxies, Decay of comets, Dust on the moon, Slowing of earth's rotation, Heat loss from earth, Niagara Falls erosion and many more. Billions of years is story telling.

[@mountainhours4443]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Also there is no such thing as evolution (No evidence for it). You continue to lie to the students with no science to back it up.

[@mountainhours4443]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Provide evidence for evolution. I know you can not do it as there is none. All talk and no action. Good Luck!

[@mountainhours4443]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Just as I thought, NOTHING! You are a liar.

[@mountainhours4443]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Still Nothing?

[@fckickboxer]

I am a geologist in Colorado. You can see the Great Unconformity here in several places. I remember, as a student at CU Boulder, all my professors clearly stated that no one knows why the Great Unconformity exists. It’s b/c they re viewing it from a secular worldview.

[@keithb4604]

Please explain what is the great unconformity

[@steve-oh4342]

@@spicyroads unbiased? Oh the irony.

[@billcat1840]

Do you see large boulders embedded in mudflow rocks? some of them are incredibly massive. It took alot of water to throw them around

[@kimbanton4398]

@@spicyroads secular is the opposite of unbiased

[@sean748]

Any scientist unwilling to declare that they do not know is not worth your time. Science is inductive - it can only ever disprove falsities.

[@Midnight_Rein]

I'm really glad this is up for free, when my pastor showed clips in church I was not yet saved, and rocks, fossils, biology, are all sciences that have peaked my interest, and I have a hard time seeing things and answering things without a secular evolutionist view.

[@billybob4274]

You;re still not saved as there is no god. Without science, we would have nothing that we have today. We would still be living in caves, no farming, no anything really. The Bible itself is a thing because of science. Everything points to evolution(which has been documented), and nothing points to a god or creationism except for a belief.

[@1voiceCriesOut]

This host reminds me a lot of Mike Row...he is very attentive to each of the interviewees and contributes to the conversation in a meaningful way. Great documentary. Thank you❤

[@markwildt5728]

That's called reading from a script... But yes, it was well done.

[@billybob4274]

Mike Rowe is a realist who wants to help people. These people want to enslave people to a belief.

[@jobotmang]

" (A)Paradigm ( has been) imposed on the data rather the the data providing the paradigm". Makes sense.

[@nicholaseaves2591]

That's literally what christians do with science. They have a narrative paradigm established by the bible and their faith and then cherry pick evidence to support their claims and ignore the evidence that refutes them. I work with a seventh day Adventist that believes in "biblical science" and we get into arguments all the time that end with him throwing up his hands saying "That's what i believe and nothing will change it!". That is the complete opposite of the scientific method

[@michael9237]

@@nicholaseaves2591 Mr. eaves, that's literally what atheists do with science as well. It's a matter of competing worldview interpretations over the exact same evidence, the difference is that atheistic-Naturalism is demonstrably internally inconsistent, it has an embarrassing history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, it can't explain foundational things that it ought to be able to explain, and it is not existentially viable (ie. you can't live it out in reality). We already discussed how atheistic-Naturalists believe in Supernatural phenomena (and you tried to say that pre-existence is "natural" - God is pre-existent)... you know, for all your anti-God assertions, you sure do suspiciously live perfectly in line with everything He said about you. See by your belief system you are a meaningless evolved chemical accident in a meaningless universe - you have no basis by which to assert your opinions, human value, how you deserve respect, or to explain why you as a human being have unique capacities to be able to exercise "dominion" over all of creation. Why is murder wrong - who cares if we kill another chemical reaction, it's just chemicals? On what basis do you assert that you are any more important than, say, a dirt clod on the side of the road - you're both just chemical reactions? Your very thoughts are mere chemical reactions in your brain, how can you trust them? I love that you do these things though because this is evidence that you are not just a chemical accident in a meaningless chemical universe, but that you were made in the image and likeness of God (Genesis 1:27) with a capacity for "dominion" over creation (Genesis 1:26) with morality (Genesis 9:6) a conscience (Romans 2:15) and deserving a basic degree of respect (James 3:10) among other things. You are a walking contradiction to your own atheistic religion, and you live as if you believe in the Bible, and I love that God put such internal inconsistency into you so you can clearly see evidence in your own behavior that He exists and that He created you. You are truly blessed. This is a problem called existential viability (the ability to live out your worldview in reality), and a lack of existential viability is one sign of a faulty worldview. Existential viability is a problem for atheistic-Naturalists and their meaningless puddles to people belief system. Existential viability is not a problem for a biblical worldview. You are not a meaningless chemical accident. You are a valuable human being made in the image and likeness of God with a purpose, morality, and deserving of respect. "They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them." (Romans 2:15) "But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- *having a form of godliness but denying its power.* Have nothing to do with such people." (2 Timothy 3:1-5)

[@HS-zk5nn]

it is so sad that even in the 21st century, some people believe that humanity evolved from pond scum and want others to believe that because ... science.

[@nicholaseaves2591]

@@michael9237 the religious answer has no explanatory mechanism. Intelligent design can't be tested. It's not even close to comparable with scientific theory

[@nicholaseaves2591]

@@michael9237 btw, im not going to reply to all the assertions in your novel of a comment. Try to be more concise. This is a youtube comment thread. Not a college dissertation

[@mysticalglowtv1796]

There is two ways to live your life, One way is to live as if there are no miracles, The other way is to live as everything is a miracle.

[@vivians9392]

The whole universe and everything in it is a miracle!

[@larrynickel2807]

(quoted from Einstein)

[@keyboarddancers7751]

There ARE two ways...

[@DrDrakesr]

Best Answer

[@YDDES]

If we start to believe in ”miracles”, we can never be sure of anything. Just anything can happen any time.

[@rawpraisehorn5716]

My wife and I like this presentation so much that we have watched it many times .

[@unclecharliesunholyworldof7145]

Me and my wife give each other sloppy toppy twice a week to it. In the name of the Lord.

[@sjl197]

There’s a vast wealth of other information out there, step away from the brainwashing now and try a second video elsewhere.

[@Bellajane127]

This documentary has changed my husband's belief! Thank you for making this documentary and posting this on youtube. My husband didn't believe in God and didn't believe there was a creator all his life until he watched this documentary in 2021. He was lead to research about God after his employer decided to have a vaccine mandate to all their employees but gave religious exemptions. After watching this documentary, my husband claimed religious exemption and in his letter to his employee, he declared that there is a God who gave him his immune system and is good enough to fight any virus. Thank God he got the religious exemption from getting the vaccine! Keep up the good fight Is Genesis History team and God bless! We've purchased the movie and have been sharing this movie with family and friends.

[@psalm91allthyways]

I Love this testimony! Praise the LORD! God bless you & your husband!!!!!

[@jonathanlucas3604]

Humanity has worked a long time without divine help to rid ourselves of the worst diseases imaginable: polio, smallpox, measles, mumps, rubella, rsv, flu, diptheria, tetanus, and many more. I hope your husband doesn't have to learn by experience what humanity has had to learn. That being said, I have a deep and abiding hatred for anti vaxxers.

[@scrumpymanjack]

Just ask the millions who died of COVID whether, if they were given a second chance, they would take the vaccine shot. I wonder what they would say!

[@marilyntape508]

Amazing 💯%🙏

[@radioguy801]

@@scrumpymanjack how many boosters are you up to?

[@JoshJordison]

This is the best creationist program I have ever watched. It was wonderfully done and truly glorifies God. All creation was meant to praise the Lord, and this program just shows how amazing He is! I will most definitely recommend people watch it.

[@KristerAndersson-nc8zo]

So they lie and you admire them for it.

[@zac3392]

Krister Andersson Hi! I’m interested in inaccuracies, could you point a few out, please? Thanks!

[@guiagaston7273]

@D.C. a visit to you local middle school will clear be enough to debunk a whole lot of these lies.

[@STMYL2525]

Guia Gaston if they couldn’t comprehend it the first time I doubt it will work the second time. They want to believe this flawed opinion based video instead of you know real science.

[@bull010163]

Josh Jordison And lies through its teeth. If there was concrete evidence of a god, any of them, it would have been produced by now. However none is forthcoming. We are supposed to believe in myth and hearsay. I prefer solid scientific evidence. We don’t have all the answers yet, but the bible has had to reinterpreted so many times as science moves forward, it makes the bible pointless and irrelevant.

[@Marci-Yah777]

Brilliant documentary- without all the lies, the world makes sense. The Almighty is the creator of all - I am in awe and praise. Thank you 🙏

[@DIRTY-4PLAY]

Religion is a lie, there is no proof of gods

[@billybob4274]

The Bible is nothing but lies. Every single thing in the Bible was written well after the supposed events took place. It was passed down orally, and we know that is accurate 😉🤣

[@storybyosmosis]

Excellent work. I've had a foundation of God's Word and His Creation built into me as a young person and still greatly enjoy hearing the consistency and proof of God's existence and intentions in His Creation. Thanks for putting this together and giving us a great opportunity to review and strengthen the Truth.

[@jacquelineyu78]

Thank you so much for making this documentary free on KZbin so that I could recommend it to ppl who believe in evolution. Giving them second opinion on something they thought was true but really was just hypothesis. Your work is so blessed. It makes such a difference!

[@pauldallaire7164]

In the end, it matters more where I'm headed. Believing in God's history is a choice we've been given. I chose to believe and spend an eternity with my Lord and Savior. See ya there!

[@AuntNutmeg]

@Boz Scaggs You are literally living surrounded by the evidence you seek. Your thinking causes you to ignore it and explain it away with other explanations. Ask God to open your eyes to the truth.

[@AuntNutmeg]

@Boz Scaggs The real world you live in was created by God. The reason you live in an ordered world, with laws like gravity you can depend upon, is because God is a God of order. Your very existence depends upon His willingness to allow you to continue to exist despite your scoffing at His existence.

[@AuntNutmeg]

@Boz Scaggs Have you watched the video, or just commented below it?

[@AuntNutmeg]

@Boz Scaggs It is/was news world wide! The book you refuse to read is the international best seller every year. Where is the proof it was changed substantially?

[@AuntNutmeg]

@Boz Scaggs Actually, the NYT took the Bible off their bestseller list because it would win every time. Yes, all belief requires faith, including belief in evolution. The origin of the universe cannot be repeated, therefore it cannot be tested as observational science can be. We'd have to have an eyewitness testify as to what happened.

[@samuelrivera4362]

A must see presentation for all who love the subject on Bible Science and Creation.

[@rebsince71]

Nicholas, everyone in this film, including the host, is doctorate level educated. Which science are you referring to?…Everyone, including those scientists you choose to agree with, are giving opinions. They’re giving hypotheses. Carbon dating, at best, is highly inaccurate and unreliable. No one, including those scientists 200 years ago, was around to validate any claims. This representation, to me, has indeed met the standard to be given consideration.

[@ChristEnlightenment]

@Nicholas Christie-Blick you aren't a good scientist you actually believe in fairy tales and lies, I'm sorry for your lack of faith, and also hate for Christianity and God, you must be a big sinner

[@GAMER123GAMING]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 "They are contradicted by things we learnt" or false narratives that are pushed? No... no... cant quesiton things

[@danielduvana]

No, obviously not. This entire movie is absolutely bananas.

[@LorimaMalo]

You must be a brilliant noble prize winner scientist in all the fields that know everything and bold enough to deny the researches done and detailed by these scientists in this video... 😂😂😂

[@pattiwaseta1672]

I saw this on Netflix back in 2017. Finally, a documentary about the planet that makes sense. And it's so well done!

[@spongebombepicpants1073]

Netflix? I thought this platform is just a godless entertaining place!

[@edgarmatzinger9742]

_"Finally, a documentary about the planet that makes sense."_ Nothing in the bible makes sense.

[@spongebombepicpants1073]

@@edgarmatzinger9742 Explain what does not make sense.

[@che7wins614]

One of the best documentaries I’ve ever watched, so logical and sensible. Very well produced, well done to all and all Glory to God.

[@shanehughes8528]

How did you get that from any of this absoute nonsense?

[@Kehvo_exe]

Shane Hughes You’re just ignorant and looking for people to annoy, run along and grow up. Internet trolls really are the equivalent of annoying mosquitoes

[@shanehughes8528]

@Ezabi ... says some one who believes in talking donkeys, talking snakes, dragons, and probably unicorns all cause "My book says so." Though thats all you have. a book that is wrong about just about everything. Oh and magic. You believe magic real

[@carolrozier756]

It's complete nonsense that only someone who's ignorant of science and very gullible would believe. Austin is liar and a coward.

[@shanehughes8528]

@Kile Not resuppostions these are all things the bible say happened and the fact you still think a donkey talked at any point in time shows exactly what I was talk king about. These things never happened. It's odd the "Miracles' went from separationing the Red Sea to now where people go "I beat cancer. It was a miracle cause of god." Forgetting they took human medicine that cured them and an invisible man did nothing.

[@JESUSSavesWAKEUP]

Your ministry was a major reason of me coming to Christ. I couldn’t justbelieve, I had to know.

[@Gamefan86]

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun. Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info. .. .. . .. ..

[@Gamefan86]

@JESUS slaves, it's a shame none of it is true.

[@JESUSSavesWAKEUP]

@@Gamefan86 behind me Satan! I researched it all and found the Truth. I won’t give you counterarguments because you won’t read them but continue searching the Truth and you will find it.

[@JESUSSavesWAKEUP]

I know you will come back here someday and say you found Jesus. Because all that search for Truth sincerely will find it. Meanwhile I’m praying for you

[@billybob4274]

@@JESUSSavesWAKEUP If you researched and still came up believing in god, then you didn't really research. Christianity stole everything it is from different religions. They weren't the first monotheist god, not the first resurrection, no the first to die, etc. Even stole pagan holidays to help get people to convert. Christmas, Halloween, and Easter. Actually research and learn. You researched nothing. Happy Saturnalia.

[@terrymeadows1827]

Wonderful, compelling presentation. Thank you and God bless you all.

[@IsGenesisHistory]

You are very welcome! We're so glad you enjoyed our film.

[@billybob4274]

Nothing compelling her except for believers, as everything presented has been done so with ill intentions. Look things up instead of just believing. Wait, that's what religious people do, believe instead of know. When someone uses a test that is not meant to be used in the way it was done, it is with ill intention, as these people were warned beforehand. That one issue throws everything else out. Want another? Comparing erosion in 2 different places, with 2 different materials, as the same. Ash and rock are 2 different materials. Of course erosion happens faster in ash than rock.

[@terrymeadows1827]

@@billybob4274 Of course it's compelling for we believers. I've always found it amusing when God-deniers lob accusations at the Holy Scriptures. Where's your confidence, your certainty that God does not exist that you need to dispute its truth claims? Something's eating at you. ;)

[@Biblical_Mystery]

Wow, I'm thoroughly impressed! The effort and creativity you've put into this video really shine through. Can't wait to see more!

[@IsGenesisHistory]

Thank you @Biblical_Mystery! There is much more to come!

[@Samael-Metzger]

This is laughable to anybody with a proper education in the sciences and geology.

[@michaelg377]

@@Samael-Metzger Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles of chemicals can fizz into people by chance if you just wait a long enough *time,* and that planets can randomly clump together to meet 122 precise anthropic constants (conditions required for life) - a 1 in 10^138 probability - from a "Big Bang" by chance? Science is a methodology. What you're talking about is an Ideology, and I just don't have enough faith to believe that these unscientific beliefs happened by chance, never mind the many scientific problems with them. *"The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse"* (Romans 1:20)

[@lindafras1762]

I Thank YOU All" SO Much", For That Christian program Of (GENESIS History"!). The only Things). They didn't talk about Was THE Many "Earthquakes". Of "THAT'S HAPPENED"😳." THROUGHOUT The Many HUNDREDS OF YEARS".

[@user-gl4fq7jt9p]

@@Samael-Metzger okay my bulle, gaan huil by jou ma.

[@megaterang]

I know my experience is only anecdotal but I once watched a very strong flash flood cut away a swath of earth at least 20 feet deep and a half mile long of what had previously been solid rock. Rushing water is incredibly strong and once rocks get mixed with it, even solid granite rock walls are ripped away by the force. This happened in New Mexico during the summer monsoons late 1980's. It all happened in about a half hour. I remember walking out into the gorge it left. The landscape was completely changed - gone in fact. It was a place where my young wife and I often walked our dog and I also remember joking with my wife that I wonder if this how the grand canyon was formed and we laughed and said maybe it took only a couple of years and not billions. I actually think the instantaneous force of water is a more credible explanation for the Grand Canyon then the slow erosion of billions of years.

[@rickkwitkoski1976]

Have you ever BEEN to the Grand Canyon!!! It is NOT composed of unconsolidated till like shown in this video. The rocks (ROCKS not soil!) are different layers of differing hardness and types that contain embedded fossils that can be seen to be of a specific type in each layer. There are several places where the planes of the sedimentary rock are tilted to extreme angles as well. NOT the result of a quick outflow of debris material but rather a slow sedimentation process that shows that different types of material were laid down at different times. ALSO the bottom of the canyon cuts through many hundreds of feet of very hard IGNEOUS rock! Rock that was molten and then solidified underground. This guy's equating of his little stream and erosion gully to the Grand Canyon is completely ludicrous! Rather than finding someone who supports your pre-conceived ideas and conclusion, why don't you look at the actual evidence first! Understand the parameters that must have existed before the Grand Canyon could have been cut and then get a real and actual conclusion. You obviously have no background in soil geology, rock geology, hydraulic physics, paleontology, geomorphology or any credible science discipline. Grand Canyon's rough dimensions: 1 mile deep, 10 miles wide, 100 miles long. Through SOLID ROCK!

[@mde6955]

@ megaterang- least 20 feet deep and a half mile long. Multiple that by 10,000 feet at least. Open mindedness. Global not county. Watch the video. If you did you closed your hearing!

[@dlighted7643]

megaterang yeah, a global flood! Duh! It only makes sense. I’ve thought about this for a long time. It’s actually annoying how dumb smart people can be. Forgive them God. Strengthen us to love them!

[@rossrosco4544]

@@jimmyray5524 Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????

[@BibleResearchTools]

Ross Rosco , you wrote, "Hundreds of Creationist scientists have changed their minds. None of the millions of other scientists have. Why would that be ?????" None? You must live in a cave. I believed in evolution until I was in my 60's. An examination of the geologic column converted me. There is no way those thick, homogeneous, uneroded, unbioturbated sedimentary rock layers were gradually deposited. A global flood is the only thing that makes scientific sense. Dan

[@unionjackjohn]

Thank you Jesus! You're so awesome!

[@longcastle4863]

Jesus founded a religion that breeds racism and authoritarian governments. Just a few steps away really from that other, you know, burn them at the stake thing... _By their fruits you shall know them... Right?_

[@Praise___YaH]

Here is the Original Semitic Text. HERE is The Savior YaH The Heavenly FATHER HIMSELF was Who they Crucified for our sins and “HERE IS THE PROOF” From the Ancient Semitic Scroll: "Yad He Vav He" is what Moses wrote, when Moses asked YaH His Name (Exodus 3) Ancient Semitic Direct Translation Yad - "Behold The Hand" He - "Behold the Breath" Vav - "Behold The NAIL"

[@brandondry]

@@Praise___YaH "In the beginning there was the Word, and the Word was with God and the Word was God", John 1:1

[@patrickvanbaal2837]

@Anonymous Dummy It's not a documentary and it doesn't make any sense in the real world.

[@patrickvanbaal2837]

@Anonymous Dummy Good thing that your god is fictional and none of that ever happened.

[@richard00langdon]

Is Genesis history? You betcha 🙏

[@Mark-cq9nq]

What a great production! I've saved this and plan to share it with my entire family and friends. Thank you!

[@therakles8142]

I also downloaded the video and will show it to others too!

[@domagojbiskupic3807]

this is nonsense! who believes in these lies. these are melted buildings, stone and brick! compare it to Sodom and Gomorrah and you will see the difference or you won't!! no difference same forms! Ron Wyatt

[@douglaspearce1187]

Let's hope they are more intelligent than you, then

[@domagojbiskupic3807]

@@douglaspearce1187 whatever¨!

[@martinkent333]

PARANOIA NEEDS TO BE SHARED? @@therakles8142

[@schris9664]

So thankful you guys invested so much of your time, energy and money to make this fascinating documentary. Thanks so much for making it available on KZbin!

[@rogerhector5885]

i agree fascinating

[@miketomlin6040]

It's more fascinating how in 2020, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary- including the fact homo sapiens behave almost exactly the same as Monkeys - there are still some people who believe Bible stories!

[@elviahernandez3313]

Exactly 😩

[@sathviksidd]

@@miketomlin6040 atleast better than believing there is no right or wrong and there is no meaning to life and no reason to do science

[@miketomlin6040]

@@sathviksidd I don't understand your comment?

[@spcornelissen]

I have struggled for so long on this topic, was everything created in 6 days or not; I worked in the nuclear industry and even re-designed instruments to refine decay and dating readings. This video was the most wonderful explanation of the importance to understand the history in Genesis and I’ll never question the Bible again, whether the creation happened in 6 physical days as we know it or in 6 different time periods as interpreted as days. The complexity of life had to come from somewhere and I believe it was from God, even if he had to destroy it to make it better.

[@hippopotamus6765]

Of course everything was created in 6 days. He was so exhausted that he had to have a break and rested on the 7th. This is the creator of the universe which is 92 billion light years in diameter. But you'd know all about this stuff because of your nuclear knowledge.

[@subbull1]

Thank you for sharing Pierre, you are a blessing for many of us.

[@maxmac7845]

The order of creation according to the Bible doesn't trouble you at all? Are you certain a bias is not at play in your post?

[@Tigerbythetoe]

“I’ll never question the bible again”...? Well that’s the surest way to prove it’s true, stop questioning and it all makes sense.

[@civilization57]

@@hippopotamus6765 OK, hippo, if you're so smart, please tell us where all the matter and energy in the universe came from. And please tell us where all the laws of the universe came from. And please tell us where life came from. And the laws of morality. Tell us how evolutionists can defy the laws of science, like biogensis, the conservation of matter, the laws of thermodynamics, the laws of genetics. And finally, give us your proof that God and a spiritual world does NOT exist. Thank you.

[@user-gd3se9fp5v]

Scientific interaction and collaboration at a high level. Weighty arguments and analysis that confirm intelligent design and undermine Darwinian evolution. It strengthens our faith in God and Jesus. 🙏👏

[@KeepMeLord05]

I bought the whole series for my brother who's a Christian but oddly believes in evolution too. He's a college graduate I am not, so hopefully these men can speak more on his level. When we discuss this issue all I can answer with is "because God said so" which is good enough for me but doesn't satisfy him. Being a female I learned my lesson from Eve if God said it's TRUE.. Genesis 3.

[@michaelg377]

@@kimhoffmannandersen5477 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, and if you just wait a really long *Time* then puddles of chemicals can turn themselves into people?

[@porcelainish]

it does save thinking for yourself doesn't it?

[@ricoramos9864]

Just watched it a second time..learned more. I'm 70 and still learning about my Lord and His creation. Thank you.

[@michael9237]

Did you know that even the 4000-5000 year old secular Chinese language contains Biblical imagery in some of its characters? I have yet to see a reasonable secular explanation for this: For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). There are dozens of these, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist for millennia after the Chinese language began? Also *did you know that secular scientists debunked evolutionist claims to "junk DNA"?* We've been lied to. "The evidence of God... has been clearly seen since the beginning in all that has been created, so they will have no excuse" (Romans 1:20)

[@michael9237]

The belief that nothing created everything, that nature created itself (which requires Nature to be Pre-Existent - a *supernatural* quality), that all the right proteins required for life created themselves *in contrast to the known scientific problem of hydrolysis* which prevents protein formation, that the mass quantities of instructions in DNA created themselves *in contrast to the observable evidence* that other instance of information which always has an intelligent source, the belief that fish evolve into philosophers, that we are literally related to bananas, and that entire universes can just pop into existence at any moment.... *is incompatible with entire disciplines of science* . *Did you know that secular scientists even recently disproved evolutionist claims to "junk DNA"?*

[@killaxdoughboy4394]

@@NilsEldor 10 ways? Present them

[@killaxdoughboy4394]

@@NilsEldor I cannot help you

[@killaxdoughboy4394]

@@NilsEldor Ignorance is bliss. Any clinical psychologist could see you need help. You contradict yourself within your mind and are oblivious to the action. What's your stance on religion? Humor me. What dictates your life if not God? You claim the idiocy in me originates from a source you don't even believe to exist. I'm perplexed. Then you claim God punishes you while also pointing towards the claim that he doesn't exist? No need to respond

[@binevanit]

I been looking for this video for 51 years and I finally found it ! From now on Im going to sleep in peace.

[@velocitysam4185]

Please tell us more..

[@chriskragtwijk6191]

Sarcastic XD

[@Gamefan86]

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun throug the heavens.

[@immanuelhavneraas]

Interesting and cool things. There would be no problem with much of what you are saying. It can be two things at the same time though. The bible is the best Book for society and tells us the most of our universe and salvation. It certainly is different than other religion since it is anti-works based salvation meaning that you can not earn your salvation by your own good works.

[@thelinkthad]

I watched tonight! Well done!!! ❤❤❤ I highly recommend

[@FirestarterTube]

VERY...VERY WELL DONE!!! My heart leaped at every segment of truth and WISDOM!!! Thank you!!!

[@gerby8]

I’m in my 50’s as I grow old I do appreciate everything I see miracles every single day

[@michael9237]

@@maylingng4107 With respect, what's miraculous is that evolutionists literally believe that mass quantities of ordered and sequenced instructions (DNA) can come into existence out of non-information without an intelligent source in contrast to every other observable instance of information in existence which always has an intelligent source . It's sad that when they run into a problem like young comets that don't fit in their billions of years atheistic religion (evolution, Big Bang, etc.), they are willing to fabricate entire celestial objects like Oort clouds without a shred of observable evidence . When we find young soft tissues in dinosaur fossils, or young C-14 inside of diamonds, coal deposits all across the US, and in fossils from every geologic layer, evolutionists just reject it and twist the evidence to fit their atheistic religious beliefs concerning our origins. Then when the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and other laws of physics contradict each other at the beginning of the universe (making it naturally impossible) they invoke infinite alternate universes... a supernatural solution that supersedes our observable laws of nature, and btw, *infinite alternate universes and realities mean that there is inevitably an alternate universe that is run by magical fairies and with T-Rex's driving tanks down the street... that means that this popular atheist theory requires atheists to concede that their beliefs include the possibilities of magical fairies and other absurd fictional ideas.* And all along the way, you literally believe that we are distantly related to a banana, among so many other problems.... and then they call it "science." Evolution - the internally inconsistent, existentially unviable atheistic religion with a history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, and which cannot explain basic things that it should be able to explain. These things are not a problem for a biblical worldview. I'm not sure you have any grounds to mock Christians May Ling Ng. "It is appointed for man to die once, then comes judgment" (Hebrews 9:27).

[@sw_1776]

In the end almost every atheist will argue that there are thousands of universes and we happen to live in the one where life could exist the way it has and is now. So where exactly is the machine that's spitting out thousands of universes and where does it get the mass and energy to do so? People often criticize any religious belief strictly because they do not want to answer for anything and live as they see fit. Don't judge them for that show them love, hate and blood profits mankind nothing

[@michael9237]

@May Ling This isn't a question of evidence, it's a matter of competing worldviews over the exact same evidence. For example, please consider the following observations from your belief system (several of which you have personally championed here): The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

[@mtmhoops1506]

@@michael9237 MICHAEL you are a absolute Menace to atheist in this comment section and I’ve read so meny of your comments, I’m a brother in Christ is there any way I could get in contact with you, Facebook ,snap chat email, phone number anything man, I’m very Shook by your intellect and I would like to talk to you farther brother

[@alantasman8273]

@@maylingng4107 There is a word for people who fail to see life for the precious gift it is...bigoted or hateful.

[@WayneMemphisMojo]

Absolutely among the most important videos i have EVER viewed.

[@WayneMemphisMojo]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 I do not agree with you

[@WayneMemphisMojo]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 I'm very proud of you Nicholas for pursuing your degree.

[@ozowen]

@@WayneMemphisMojo Your agreement or disagreement is irrelevant. The literally understood creation myths are a nonsense.

[@ronmey7500]

@@WayneMemphisMojo Little good that it may be.

[@WayneMemphisMojo]

@@ozowen I am a creationist

[@jmckasyru]

A very wise statement: "The past is the key to the present."

[@emmanuel5566]

All these guys really need their own series!!

[@gerrymoningkey5298]

this documentary has an addictive quality to it, I watched it over and over again and never got bored. God bless you all

[@michael9237]

Here is another piece of evidence that I hope you find of interest: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.

[@michael9237]

@@IIrandhandleII Ignoring evidence is a normal atheistic-Naturalist response... *Did you know that atheistic-Naturalists unavoidably have to invoke Supernatural phenomena to "naturally" explain our universe?* The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

[@gerrymoningkey5298]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Just because their interpretation of the data don't line up with your worldview doesn't distract that they have good cinematography and screenwriting. (which is the point of my comment). Have a good day anyway ;)

[@gerrymoningkey5298]

@@IIrandhandleII That's a very poor response (resorting to personal insult) ...

[@michael9237]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 That's not true, I read everything you post and have always honestly considered it - but what you post is usually unsubstantiated claims, and when it is substantiated it is always based on worldview assumptions that are demonstrably internally inconsistent, which have a history of radical ad-hoc readjustment, which cannot explain things it ought to be able to explain, and which is not existentially viable (ie. you can't live it out in reality). 4 clear signs of a faulty worldview, none of which are a problem for a biblical worldview. Meanwhile you are the atheistic-Naturalist trolling under a Creationist KZbin video my friend, so you're also being hypocritical, with respect. Quote: "Why do I care? Were you to keep your beliefs to yourselves, I wouldn't. But in the United States today, people of faith insist on imposing their beliefs on everyone else. On social policy. On the law. On education. Religion is backward, an impediment to progress, dishonest, manipulative, the longest running scam in human history. And I am going to do whatever I can to promote its destruction." ~Nicholas Christie-Blick, 3/29/2021

[@donnaruby1304]

I too suppressed between my spiritual experiences and what appeared as lapses in scripture yet having faith that God is true. Then I began to learn of these truths in an apologetics class. It is the calming balm in these days of uncertainty. For there is one certainty - God is.

[@matthewbennier7476]

Yeah, He found me in His written word June 18th last year. God is good.

[@TMPreRaff]

ZZzzz.... ZZzzz.... ZZzzz.... ZZzzz....

[@mimilights]

Indeed❤️✝️❤️

[@danite1742]

@Jimbo Bell We collectively are God my friend. We are the only creatures on earth that can combine information into formulating new ideas. We also have the ability to heal ourselves and have supernatural abilities just like "Ice Man".

[@michael9237]

Here is another piece of evidence that I hope you find useful, from one Christian to another: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood. If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.

[@kennethswenson6214]

Okay, say the Universe is 6000 years old. Then that would mean that no star or other celestial object can be farther away than 6000 light years.

[@davidbeddow1]

What's your point? 🤔

[@h.gonyaulax2190]

@@davidbeddow1 His point is obvious.

[@markh8740]

Maybe actually watch the video

[@kennethswenson6214]

Okay, I'll write slowly so everybody understands. The "speed of light" is a constant. 186000 miles per second. Don't believe me, try looking it up, and yes I did watch the entire video, and countless others from Ken Ham and AiG. Now "could" G-d have made light "faster", so objects 12 million light years away, would get here sooner. Yep, He can also make a rock so heavy that He can't lift it. But as you pointed out, why would he have done so? And even more curious, why would He have "changed" it to go slower? Just to keep things "simple", I am going to ignore the potential issue, with slamming the "brakes" on the universe. Trust me, it wouldn't have been pretty.

[@axxelstarosteen2825]

Отличный фильм! Огромная благодарность всем создателям фильма, обязательно покажу его своим детям)

[@domagojbiskupic3807]

this is nonsense! who believes in these lies. these are melted buildings, stone and brick! compare it to Sodom and Gomorrah and you will see the difference or you won't!! no difference same forms! Ron Wyatt

[@Quinoezi]

замечательно от людей, которые привезли нам Санта-Клюз

[@daursan]

Действительно, согласен. Отличный фильм

[@IsGenesisHistory]

Большое спасибо! Мы рады, что вам понравилось.

[@florencelinderman3797]

Thank you so much for all the effort, time, and money that was put into this film. God bless you all.

[@joelbachmann10]

That is, If he exist

[@joelbachmann10]

@Jake Lloyd free will

[@joelbachmann10]

@Jake Lloyd non, we follow scientific facts

[@fredkilian4049]

@@joelbachmann10 It is not scientific fact if it is not repeatable. "Replenish the earth" says God.

[@numbersix9477]

@@fredkilian4049 --- You must be a scientist. What is your specialty?

[@lesliechristensen6974]

I love the bird in the background around 1:07. 😊

[@DeoVinDixie]

This was a realy great documentary. Thank you for making it available to us for free. Such a wonderful blessing.

[@56PapaBear56]

In the '80s, Lake Powel was at capacity and they had to open the spillways to lower the water level. They were tunnels cut into the rock to pass water around the Glen Canyon dam. When they closed them weeks later and engineers inspected the tunnels, they were amazed at the erosion in the rock walls. This is the power of water.

[@ozowen]

Ah, a dam in a place of easily eroded sandstone, known for being easily and rapidly eroded is what exactly? Do you suppose all strata behave that way?

[@SirDeanosity]

@@ozowen Cavitation will pulverize any rock when flowing at least 100ft/sec.

[@ozowen]

@@SirDeanosity "Any rock"? So is there a reason why the supposed Grand Canyon impact is not seen everywhere? Oh wait- there isn't. So the comment means what exactly?

[@chrislachat459]

@@ozowen It seems your question was answered and yet you pontificate and avoid the answer, which was correct but it didn't back your wrong bias. A global flood would provide the cataclysmic evidence we see today. Science without the bias shows this to be true. Your bias does not change truth but you knew that. There's this thing called a search engine, it will help your vain misconceptions be righted.

[@ozowen]

@@chrislachat459 The dam in question is placed on highly porous rocks subject to cavitation and easy erosion. Feel free to explain how that is the same as all rock. Reasons why there is no global flood at any time in recent history. 1) No flood strata. After any large flood event, in particular ones where there is tumultuous movement, currents, collisions of currents, concurrent tectonic activity- then any unstable strata are forced into the water, strata destroyed and the resultant strata after everything has settles tends to cruder layering in flood order (sand silt clay). We should see that globally- we do not. 2) Any aerial strata cannot be anywhere in the so called flood sedimentary layers. We have a global one plus plenty of local and regional ones all through the geo strata 3) No dry layers should be anywhere- yet there are also plenty of them. 4) Fragile laminae such as those found in varve strata have no business being in such sediment. Too fragile to survive such activity, especially since they are almost always adjacent to mountains (which were supposedly thrust up in the flood). These are biennial strata and can be manually counted- going uninterrupted, globally, hundreds of thousands or millions of years. They should not even exist. 5) Fossils should always be in muddled order. Drowned carcasses only sink to the bottom when the water is very cold. But the rapid thrust of water from the deep means the water (and air btw) get superheated by the kinetic energy alone. 6) No clear sedimentary strata for the period should exist anywhere near the upthrust mountain ranges. But they predominate. There is much more of course, but that's a start

[@arielguevara8070]

Buenísimo, buenísimo, buenísimo. Gracias, muchas gracias. God bless you!!!

[@nadjasilva6142]

Maravilhoso 👏😍👏 documentário ❤❤❤❤❤

[@TBBrickYT]

Hubby and I are Seventh-day Adventists, wanted to watch a good Creation video, and found this. MANY thanks for such an organized and stunningly beautiful presentation.

[@Sunnytrailrunner]

I did as well‼️I’m a born again believer & have watched a KZbin channel called “Hope Through Prophecy,” which is basically 7th Day Adventist, & have learned a great deal. After reading through quite a few mostly negative comments posted here, l was immediately uplifted when l got to yours & read it❗️l found this video well-presented & very enjoyable. CHECK THIS OUT ➡️ KZbin has an official trailer for the new Biblically based movie called “THE ARK & THE DARKNESS,” being released 3/20&21/2024 & shown in select theaters around the country (dates may vary, depending on your location). May God richly bless you & your husband‼️

[@murrayhamilton2658]

Me too. It is a pity the presenters don't understand that the Universe is much older than the surface of this earth. The comment in day 4 is an aside (He made the stars also). It does not state that the stars were spoken into existence on Day 4 of the creation week.

[@yvetteschneider5172]

Everything old is new again... amazing how science of old can be explained to be a newer occurrence by the explanation of layers of earth being formed by water, heat and cooling with the water subsiding, retreating, and not taking an extreme amount of time such as millions or more of years to do so in a miniscule amount of time compared to that being anywhere from a mere generation to just a few generations. Incredible!

[@adelinomorte7421]

***universal time is not the same as our "clock time"***

[@billybob4274]

There is no evidence of a great flood that covered the entire world. The entire world of a small group of people in a localized area, sure. There is NO evidence that it was just a generation to a few generations. ALL evidence points to millions and billions of years. I want to see the erosion that created the Grand Canyon happen in just a few generations. It cannot, and did not.

[@helengoff9675]

Enjoying this on a rainy afternoon. I have watched it many times, and it fills me with joy every time. Thank you for producing this!

[@michael9237]

Helen, here is another piece of evidence that corroborates Genesis, and I hope you find it of interest: Did you know that the secular 4000-5000 year old Chinese language suspiciously contains biblical imagery not found in any other known mythology? How did it get in there? For example, the Character for "boat" consists of the characters "vessel" " *eight* " and "people," suspiciously matching Noah's family of 8 on the ark. The character for "flood" consists of "water" and "total", and the character for "total" is made up of "together," " *eight* ," and "earth," again suspiciously matching Noah's flood. The character for "To create" consists of "speak" "dust" "life" "walk" suspiciously matching how God spoke life into existence and formed man from the dust of the ground. The character for "devil" consists of the characters "secret" "man" "garden" "alive" , and the character for "tempter" consists of "devil" "two trees" and "cover," suspiciously matching the description of Satan in the Garden of Eden. The character for "Garden" includes "dust" "breath" "two persons" "enclosure" again suspiciously matching the account of God creating Adam and Eve from the dust in the Garden of Eden. The character for "happiness" includes "God" and "sheep" reflecting God's desire throughout the Bible to be with His sheep. The character "forbidden/to warn" includes "God" and "Two Trees" suspiciously matching the two trees God put in the Garden of Eden to give man a free will choice between good and evil (among other things). Some argue that the Bible is just a "Bronze age" copy of other ancient mythologies, but that doesn't make sense. There are dozens of these Chinese characters with specifically biblical imagery, and I have yet to see an ancient copycat legend that has these same details. *The birth of the Chinese language suspiciously lines up with the time the Bible says the Tower of Babel incident occurred, and it would make sense if this imagery entered their language because the early Chinese people were simply familiar with the biblical account of creation and the biblical flood.* If you deny that though, then how do you explain this? Christian missionaries didn't exist until millennia after the Chinese language began. As a related finding, some ancient Chinese writings and pottery depict cultural parallels between the ancient Chinese and ancient Hebrew people concerning animal sacrifices... food for thought.

[@Captain-Awesome]

@@michael9237 Wow!! I didn’t know any of those details. I am a card carrying Christian would you email that to me? I’ll send it when you respond back just don’t want to have my email out there.

[@Captain-Awesome]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 You sir have over a thousand posts on this channel. Seems to me that you are on a mission. What else do you do during the day other than hate God for creating you??

[@Captain-Awesome]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 I left you a longer comment and question on another post but quickly as a Scientist how then does soft tissue last for millions and of years in Dinosaur bones in the wild in extreme conditions?

[@timgiles9413]

@@Captain-Awesome Amen !!! You have to keep in mind that his Father is Satan and he will live in Hell with him if he doesn't repent.

[@fepatriot]

When the windows of heaven and the fountains of the deep opened, the earth became one huge ocean covering even the highest mountains. But my big question is ,where did the waters recede to following the flood?

[@TheLookingGlass001]

Well knowing that water came from beneath the earth also would assume that there was somewhat a cavern to store the water. Much like an aquifer, the water likely just made its way back to where it came. I'm no professional, it is honestly my best guess. Hope this at least gives an idea for you

[@michaelg377]

Earth is still 70% covered in water today. According to NOAA, if our earth had a smooth flat "outer shell" surface (ie. no mountains, etc.), the water would be 8200 feet deep worldwide. I don't know if that measurement is accurate because I haven't verified it myself, but I do know this... Secular scientists believe Mars was once covered in water, which would explain how it has its canyons throughout - yet there is no observable liquid water on Mars. Earth is 70% covered in water, with marine fossils on mountain tops, and even solid layers of rocks bent at vertical 90 degree angles with no breakage - indicating they were soft, pliable, and *wet* when they folded - plenty of evidence for a global flood, but we say "there's no way earth could have been covered in water by a global flood." Why do we have such a double standard here? It's because of our Atheistic/Evolutionary biases in interpreting the evidence.

[@StephenBingham-kp2ld]

They evaporated!

[@MarcelinhoTheRock]

Muito obrigado, terminei de ver hoje, simplesmente incrível, obrigado pelos brasileiros que colocaram legenda.

[@whilimtaff]

God bless from the USA❤❤❤

[@robertjacob5dmk3]

very powerful and thank you to all who made this factual events come to life in the 20th century. Christianity Is The Beacon Of Light Love for GOD and Hope .

[@chrislachat459]

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 your butt-hurt screeds don't change anyone's minds. Common sense easily shows truth will rule over you. Selah

[@chrislachat459]

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 LOL. Atheist are religious, that's were the common sense comes in. Atheist have made "science" their religion of choice, not that it implies they're any smarter, just more arrogant. Science is God's creation, so it therefore makes known what is applied to our lives and in our lives. Christian's with this view have no problem with a young earth just as God describes in Genesis. That's what this video shows and it's why unbelievers gnash their teeth in anger. Don't like it, move on. We are steadfast.

[@judahborgwardt2860]

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 You sound hurt... are you alright? Cuz competing in a shouting match against Christians isn't gonna do anything.

[@judahborgwardt2860]

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 The cool thing about the Bible is that it never says how old the universe is. Genesis just begins with, "Now the earth was formless and empty" so for all we know, the universe itself could actually be billions of years old. It also doesn't mention how long Adam and Eve were on the earth for before the fall into sin. The earth itself could also be billions of years old, since no animals would have died in a perfect world. And yes, it can be frustrating sometimes seeing Christians wander into an argument and get blasted because they don't correctly know how to defend their faith. I've seen Christians say terrible things and not act like they should (Im on ifunny, so that should explain a lot). That's the effect of sin in the world because nobody is perfect. My "philosophy" is just seeing other people as... well, people. We often get caught up in everything that we forget that a comment online was made by a real person with their own life and experiences. So if everyone is willing to see the other side from a different perspective, we could truly open our minds and find what the universal truth is. Well, that's my rant for today. Thanks for listening and not being rude. Have a good day ;)

[@judahborgwardt2860]

@@diddsdaddiddsdad6865 Ayy no problem. That's awful to hear as well. These days I feel like "Christians" just use the title to make themselves feel superior. It's just depressing as the rest of us get a bad name. The way you spot a true Christian is the way they act. If they always act out of turn and force their religion on others, everything becomes a huge problem. True Christians try to act as we believe Jesus did - even loving our enemies, which seems impossible at times. Of course, that doesn't mean we don't make mistakes. Everyone is sinful... but all have been saved. Hats off to ya 🎩

[@jordanmassey7598]

This video gave me chills and really cemented the fact that God is very much in the midst of His creation. Just to think about some of the points about time, dispersions, and fossils you can see the consistency with the Genesis account. This challenges me to take God’s word more seriously! God bless y’all!

[@michael9237]

*Did you know that the Theory of Evolution shares characteristics of a religion?* In 1981-82 in a federal court in Arkansas it was ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Hundreds of Living fossils? Allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Discovering that numerous allegedly "vestigial" organs actually have a purpose? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Finding an alleged 70 million year old evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?* ....or do we just reinterpret all of this evidence against evolution to sustain the evolutionary belief system? Should we hold evolution to the same *religious* standard? Charles Darwin said "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down... but I know not one." Darwin didn't have access to the fields of genetics and embryology when he made up his theory of naturalistic evolution. *How did male and female evolve?* Specifically, how did the two separate, yet interdependent sets of male-female reproductive *organs* with numerous precision-tuned single points of failure, evolve by "numerous, successive, slight modifications" and still enable functional reproduction? Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other one was still evolving? Going backwards in the evolutionary story, which of these critical organs do you reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications"?

[@Roger__Wilco]

@@michael9237 You can copy and paste that garbage all you want, doesn't change the fact that this film is garbage pseudoscience contributing to the dumbing down of education.

[@michael9237]

@@Roger__Wilco With respect, at least this film presents a worldview that is internally inconsistent. Did you know that atheistic-Naturalists actually believe in *Supernatural* phenomena, they just usually don't realize it? The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent. And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just dont know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias. GotQuestions .org for any honest researcher who really wants honest answers to difficult Bible questions, 650k+ questions answered and counting.

[@Roger__Wilco]

@@michael9237 I don't care about any walls of texts full of complete nonsense that you want to paste or anything from "GotQuestions .org ", again this film is garbage pseudoscience contributing to the dumbing down of education.

[@michael9237]

@@Roger__Wilco I don't think you understand the problem my friend - it's your religious worldview that is the pseudoscience here, and I say that based on empirical evidence of you misrepresenting your worldview as "science." For example, consider the following which more clearly illustrates the difference: The Creation vs. Evolution (Naturalism) debate is not about "evidence," that is a common misunderstanding. In reality *both sides have the exact same evidence* , but the difference is that both sides interpret all of the evidence very differently. For example: Evidence) Consider DNA. Richard Dawkins said a single cell amoeba has 1000 Encyclopedia Brittanicas worth of information in its DNA. This DNA contains mass quantities of ordered, sequenced, encoded instructions for building everything in our body. For example, the eye has 40 million nerve endings, 137 million light sensitive cells, a lens, and its focusing muscles move 100,000 times a day to refract light just right in order to send a signal to your brain so you can "see." DNA contains ordered, sequenced, encoded instructions with agency that tell your organs how to grow including your eyes, your reproductive system which is built to interact with the reproductive system of the opposite gender, your voice, skin, hair, and everything else about you. Evolutionist claims of "junk DNA" were recently debunked by secular researchers. *Every single instance of information in existence always has an intelligent source.* Interpretations) Now consider what these two competing worldviews do with this same evidence. Creationists consider the eye an example of deliberate intelligent design, and consistently conclude that the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source: God. Naturalists look at the eye and assert that it is a random chemical reaction that evolved and created itself over billions of years, and the information in DNA somehow created itself out of non-information without an Intelligent Source in contrast to all the rest of the observable evidence. Intelligent human beings can't hope to even begin creating an eye, but naturalists (evolutionists) are okay with believing that an eye randomly spawned itself out of a puddle or off a geothermal vent at some point in history. Creationists accept the evidence at face value as evidence of an Intelligent Creator. Naturalists deny the observable evidence (information always has an intelligent source), and/or the ordered, sequenced, encoded nature of DNA, and/or that it contains instructions and acts with agency to tell an eye how to grow. Wouldn't it be more consistent with the observable evidence to conclude that the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source? Or maybe we should just deny that it's information at all as naturalists often do... the eye's lens, 137 million light sensitive cells, 40 million nerve endings, and precise muscles to focus this system are the product of fizzing chemicals over time. And meanwhile, *all of the best evidences of evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12* . Creationists and evolutionists both agree on speciation and environmental adaptation, but we disagree on macroevolution. Creationists believe that everything is created according to its kind, and this is why they recognize that we have no conclusive evidence of one "kind" changing into another "kind." It's also why Charles Darwin said "we see nothing of these slow changes in progress, until the hand of time has marked the lapse of the ages" and Richard Dawkins said "we are condemned to live only for a few decades, and that's too slow, too small a time scale to see evolution going on" (they're talking about "macroevolution"). Evolutionists overcome this by denying "kinds" altogether - fish evolve into philosophers and we are all related to bananas. This is not a debate over "evidence" ; it's a debate over worldviews concerning the exact same evidence, and that misunderstanding (on the evolutionist side) is part of the reason it's so hard for both sides to communicate with each other on this controversial topic. When creationists see the 122 anthropic constants, the problems concerning the Faint Young Sun Paradox, a long history of radical ad-hoc readjustment in the naturalist theories, the problem of hydrolysis if life emerged on a geothermal vent, geologically active Enceladus and Pluto which should long be dead celestial objects if billions of years old, the fact that the moon would have been touching the earth within the last 1.5 billion years based on calculations concerning the tidal recession of the moon, 100,000 year old max comets, the complex interdependent male and female reproductive systems and what it would have taken for them to evolve, young Carbon-14 in billions of year old sources, fully developed vertebrate creatures in the cambrian explosion, the fact that the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics don't allow the universe to "naturally" create itself, dozens of living fossils including wasps dragonflies salamanders the 70 million year extinct coelacanth, etc. etc. etc. Creationists see a solid case for creationism, and the plausibility of naturalism diminishes. Naturalists ignore the evidence, deny design, invoke supernatural phenomena like *Infinite* alternate universes to "naturally" (atheistically) explain our origins, fabricate entire celestial objects (Oort clouds), or erroneously argue "we don't know and that's okay" when the evidence actually seems to point to a natural impossibility or absurd probabilities (formation of the universe, formation of the earth) and/or an intelligent source (DNA)... and then they call it "science." Anyone who disagrees with them is a "science-denier." See the problem? Which worldview is really honestly evaluating the evidence, and which is selectively throwing out and stretching the evidence to fit their worldview? Two worldviews, two interpretations, exact same evidence.

[@pocatekatjesvetlo]

Moc prosím přeložit vaše krásné dokumenty ,ty další ,do Českého jazyka . Moc děkuji.❤❤❤❤

[@Jeremiahwongcc]

I just found this video, what a wonderful and educational video on bringing the Word of God and Genesis, the human history and our natural systems back to the creator paradigm.

[@REFondrums]

Man, what a truly magnificent presentation. In the last 11 years of watching presentations like these, this really stands out, not just for the way the information is presented but, the artistry used to enhance it all. The flow, the feel, the music, it all works tremendously well. Much appreciation for posting it.

[@pauljeffries2069]

@@Steven-ff4wl Agreed Creationism is not science because it invokes supernatural phenomena that cannot be tested. Read more: www.newscientist.com/article/mg21128335-100-geology-will-survive-creationist-undermining/#ixzz6U7ZSTKQs

[@gunterra1]

@@Steven-ff4wl Exactly.

[@REFondrums]

@@pauljeffries2069 I don't know who you are replying to. Who's Steven? As far as Creationism not being science, your understanding of it is wrong. #1 - Creationists that are scientists see scientific problems with Naturalism and Materialism, which are also not science, when it comes to origins. #2 - Creationism uses the supernatural event of creation as a fundamental starting point, then does the science to see if what we see and observe backs up the event, by what is observed and tested. Observation, testing, and making predictions is part of creationism as much as any other realm of science. NOBODY was there. NOBODY can recreate the origin of the universe in a laboratory. NOBODY has any empirical evidence for proof. Both sides have a model. Both rely on faith for the origin of the model. It is just as supernatural to say the universe came forth from nothing by natural means. What natural means can be observed that ANYTHING can come forth from nothing, let alone, EVERYTHING. You have more faith in your story than I have in mine. Hence, Naturalism is not science. The is zero empirical evidence everything came from nothing by natural means. Everybody IN science DOES science but, when it comes to origins, who says you have the floor to demand the biblical supernatural cannot be a starting point for origins? Plenty of the world's great scientists down through time had no problem with that starting point. Because you do, you think you can refer to PhD scientists that choose another model for origins, as not practicing science in their chosen fields? Please, do let us have common sense.

[@SchiwiM]

@@REFondrums ignoring half of the evidence to come to a conclusion you already believe isn't science 😂

[@REFondrums]

@@SchiwiM Ditto. What is your evidence for everything from nothing by natural, material means? You ignore evidence for the impossibility but, you are content to believe and start there. Some would call that hypocrisy. I would. Laughing to tears does not help your side, at all. It shows its basic emptiness of anything but ridicule, which is not science, as you well know, looking back through the history of scientific discovery through actual, scientific methods. Ridicule is a poor man's evidence. So are trolls, for that matter.

[@specialtymachining]

In talking with the wife of a geologist: She said he studied the Grand Canyon, & floated the river; concluding it had to have formed underwater (submarine).

[@christianclark347]

Interesting. That complies with the conclusions presented here as well of large water-borne depositions and the bit about the underwater sand dunes locked in the upper limestone layer.

[@ironicallyxiconic]

I'm only 3 minutes in and I'm hooked. Very captivating way to open this movie! Bravo!

[@Van_Liberty]

I would love to see a treatment on the Giants and Nephilim in the pre-flood world...

[@michaelg377]

I would too, but that's a very exegetically in-depth topic and I'd be wary of searching for something like that on KZbin. Dr. Michael Heiser wrote a couple books on the subject: "The Unseen Realm" and "Reversing Hermon" which both dive deep into what the fine details of the text in light of ancient Near Eastern culture say about that particular topic.

[@vroddestroyer300]

I've watched your movie repeatedly... probably 50 times... I'm watching it again right now... Thanks!!!!

[@Paulogia]

I didn't think anyone had seen it more than me. That might count.

[@ourlifeinwashington4114]

You must check out Brian Nickels Hydroplate theory here on KZbin. It's an amazing look at the evidence from a scientific approach. It's a 6 part vid you can't miss it.

[@vroddestroyer300]

@@ourlifeinwashington4114 Sounds awesome... thanks

[@knightclan4]

Have you seen Evolutions Achilles Heel by ICR?

[@ourlifeinwashington4114]

@@knightclan4 no but I'm about too. Tyvm

[@setholsen6202]

The amount of evidence revealed in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary. If one watches this objectively, one cannot but conclude that some of the currently accepted theories of the origin of life, the flood, and other subjects are severely distorted and based on incomplete evidence and/or are influenced through false presuppositions. This explains thoroughly and offers a more sound understanding of the treated subjects. Well done and glory to God!

[@chrisyoung5929]

" in this well-made documentary is shocking and revolutionary" I disagree I watched a couple of sections and groaned at the rubbish. Like the part were they say that "you have to look at the text" about the Bible then they lie about what the Bible says about genealogy of Joseph. So a challenge pick any section of this post it here and we will look at this evidence together.

[@alphatav3733]

DD DDD Do you presuppose that there is no Creator, despite a creation? Awkward.

[@chrisyoung5929]

@@alphatav3733 Are you presupposing that all acts of creation require a thinking being some how? Where did you get that from? A volcano explodes creating a hole and new landscape do you think that means the volcano is an intentional being?

[@alphatav3733]

DD DDD so you presuppose that there isn't a Creator because you don't believe something is created? I see a building, a assume there was an architect and builder. That is my point. You believe that nothing created/formed/made/produced everything. That is also a presupposition, but it is disingenuous. The truth is that people don't want to believe in a God, because then we would be held morally accountable for all the sin in our life. Atheism allows us to make god in our image. Therefore nothing is wrong and there is no reason to argue about it. Why would you argue about something when there is no ultimate meaning to it?

[@alphatav3733]

Chris Young How did the volcano get there in the first place?

[@lesliechristensen6974]

THAT GREEN LASER. I love it, too.

[@mikekins6545]

Thankfully received.

[@sofianakharkongor2077]

I came across this channel and I am glad I watched it fully it was a mystery of time. God is great and did not give us all the wisdom he have, that leaves us a mistery to think. Praise God almighty who created heaven and earth.

[@ozowen]

Shame it's all nonsense really.

[@Gamefan86]

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun throug the heavens.

[@jonsweetland6527]

@@ozowen prove it . . .

[@joeythebushkangaroo1]

​@@Gamefan86 Interesting... reminds me of when the the True God's 10 plagues insulted ancient Egypt's many gods,at least one was proved powerless with every plague God brought against Egypt. I've never thought of Jesus's actions insulting the pagan sungod worship,which was so prolific among the pagans, with his miracles as well. Thank you for this information.

[@TheIntrovertedBella]

It's amazing how God talks to us w/o us not even knowing it. I am a believer and yesterday, I had a question as to why there are a lot of different species of dogs and birds and how do they connect to GOd's creation. Today, this video got suggested. I watched it and my question is answered. Yay! What an amazing GOd we have.

[@christopherlastname7638]

Evolution is what happen

[@mamamarianovits9029]

@@christopherlastname7638 You do realize that ALL dog breads of today are descended from wolves... yes.? This was not a case of evolution, but of breeding to the point of a loss of information(narrower and narrower gene pools).... with absolutely no additions of genetic information, whatsoever, at all. Rather than merely parroting what you've been programmed with ~mere theories~ try to engage that grey matter between your ears a wee bit. There has NEVER been one credible transition fossil, specifically showing the evolution from one "kind" to another. They have all been proven fallacious, hoaxes designed to brainwash, but were successful only in their own "debunking" upon closer study... be it through dna testing or exposure by another researcher. Evolution, as is propagated today, does not exist my friend.

[@alantasman8273]

@@michaeljameson6468 Evolution teaches that one species branched out an became others....which a species' genome makes impossible. Evolution also teaches that all living things came from a rock or even nothing.

[@alantasman8273]

@@christopherlastname7638 micro evolution or natural selection is not in doubt...evolution teaches that on species can become another...a dog can become a cat given enough time...evolution is a fairy tale at DNA put the lie to.

[@jamisojo]

@@mamamarianovits9029 the fossil called "Lucy" it's a great example of a transitional fossil. But what does it matter to you? You have decided what you believe, so you will ignore any evidence to the contrary. ....but you are naive and immature enough to suggest other people "use their grey matter." I can tall you that I have used mine. All of the physical world I see around me tells me that a supernatural being creating everything around us makes no sense to me. I find the amazing story of the changes in our physical world to be much more interesting. I don't resent people who disagree. They should believe what they like.

[@ruth5498]

Thank you for sharing this most inspiring and refreshing documentary!

[@charityhawks9890]

Great presentation. I'll be incorporating this into my Sunday School lessons.

[@Kari77251]

I love this video. I watched it about a year ago, and I rewatched it today. I think I’ll be watching it again and again, because there is so much information here. My kids are all interested in science - they each have a personal favorite - and they have asked me several questions about how different scientific principles seem to disprove our faith. This video answers their questions. It also shows them that Christianity and science aren’t mutually exclusive. Hearing marine biologists, geologists, paleontologists and astronomers explain how their fields of expertise prove Creation has helped me reconcile my family’s devout faith with our love of science. Thank you so much for this video, it is truly a gift. And, of course, Thank God for making this video possible!! To Him go the Glory!!

[@matman4464]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 outstanding ego my friend!👏👏👏

[@ozowen]

@@matman4464 Or he is speaking truth. Which is far more likely- ego or not.

[@michael9237]

I applaud you for not giving in to the scientifically ludicrous mythology that fish evolve into philosophers, that puddles can literally turn themselves into people if you just wait a really really long time, and that "nothing created everything accidentally." Unfortunately you fell into the militant atheist troll trap on this page... but amen sister. Look up GotQuestions if you need answers to hard Bible questions. Your kids are not "meaningless evolved protoplasm" in a meaningless chemical universe that doesn't care about you - they are valuable human beings made in the image of God. *"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23) *"The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord"* (Romans 6:23) *"It is appointed for man to die once, then comes Judgment"* (Hebrews 9:27)

[@ozowen]

@@michael9237 Mikey will actually try to encourage you to lie to your kids. The "science" on this video is nonsense. Your kids might start by being fooled, but when they eventually learn actual science, and the actual scientific method, then this fetid BS will necessarily fall by the wayside. Then you will need to deal with the fact that your kids will regard all that you "explained" to them as nonsense. That's a normal parent thing- so no worries. But the fact that they will likely turn away from God because the limited and nonsensical version preached here- well that will be a sad thing indeed.

[@michael9237]

I just don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers and that puddles can turn themselves into people if you just wait a really long time. Here's an observation/question: 1-) DNA contains mass quantities of ordered, sequenced, encoded information that "tells" your body how to grow, including instructions for your eye. 2-) Every single observable instance of information in existence always has an intelligent source (the words on this screen, in a book, programming in your computer, etc.) Conclusion) Therefore, consistently interpreted, the information in DNA also had an Intelligent Source (a Creator - God). How do you handle this observable evidence? Do you: A) Consistently interpret this evidence - the information in DNA had an intelligent source like the rest of the observable evidence. B) Inconsistently interpret the evidence - information in DNA Unscientifically must be the exception to all the rest of the observable evidence. Information created itself from non-information just that one time. C) Deny that it's information, it's just chemicals - chemicals just fizz into your eye's concave light-refracting lens, 137M light sensitive cells, 40M nerve endings, and precise muscles that auto-focus this complex optical system 100,000 times a day. D) Ignore the evidence, say "well science just doesn't know yet," insist on an Atheistic/Naturalistic explanation. *Wouldn't it be more scientifically consistent to interpret the information in DNA as also having an Intelligent Source, like all the rest of the observable evidence...?* Your answer speaks volumes about your scientific/unscientific worldview assumptions/biases.

[@sophisara8566]

Wow..I was a survivor of Mt. St. Helens and watched this mountain on a daily basis. Over 4 feet of volcanic ash on our roof. It was like walking on a grey moonscape in my garden.

[@voltaire6668]

So, what happened after? Did you dig out? Or was your property a totaled forever? Does insurance cover anything? Seriously curious as to what happens to you when a volcano erupts on your house.

[@hananewell547]

Woww thanks for sharing !

[@melaniehughes8909]

I was a kid living in Rainier when it erupted. We just had to stay inside for several days. We also had ash on our, everything.I remember looking at the two mountains Rainier and St Helen in the distance and Mount St Helen's top was flat like the top blew off

[@chickshd]

I was in grade school NYC when Mt. St Helen erupted. If I remember correctly, it was a few days to a week after the eruption. I remember one of the kids in class pointing to the window. Look! It was an overcast day, and we saw what appeared to be snow falling from the sky. It was ash, and it covered everything....Never forgot that day.

[@bradjunes1610]

We had 1/2 inch of the ash-----Left for home watching the blast getting mommy ready to leave. Air filters were the item in demand.

[@incognito1887]

Thanks so much! I just finished watching it. I'll be rewatching it with my friends and family. 🙏🥰😍

[@chrispeterson6646]

They do realize that Noah was instructed to bring 7 pairs of each kind of clean animals and 2 pairs of each kind of unclean animals on the Arc right?

[@tishamae6546]

What a great fascinating, thought-provoking, eye-opening, and factual Documentary. HOW GREAT IS OUR GOD! UNMEASURABLE BEYOND HUMAN MIND. Please consider accepting my endless love and support here from the Philippines. Really really worth it to watch!. Consider my endless gratitude brothers and sisters out there! God Loves you beyond your own understanding.

[@FRN2013]

Mabuhay! We're in Davao City. What place are you in?

[@matthewboster5506]

Define factual i mean Jesus Christ you people are living in a fantasy land lol grow up

[@stephaniejoiner3382]

Gods intelligence is beyond comprehension. He created all this for our enjoyment. We sinned against him and then in the richness of his grace came to earth to die for us. 1 Corinthians 2:9. What no eye has seen, nor ear heard, nor the heart of man imagined, what God has prepared for those who love him” Wow just wow.

[@michael9237]

@@maylingng4107 With respect, your argument ignores God's Omniscient character. God knew all of this would happen from the beginning, and He prophesied Jesus' coming right off the bat in Genesis 3:15. The bad things that happen are a result of allowing free will. God created everything good (Genesis 1:31), but then Adam and Eve decided to rebel against God, seek to "be like God," and follow Satan (Genesis 3:5) and trust in a lie rather than their Creator. You still see this kind of behavior today. I don't have enough faith to believe that fish evolve into philosophers, you are cousin to a banana, and entire universes can pop into existence at any moment. "They perish because they *refused to love the truth* and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a *powerful delusion* so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who *have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness* ." (2 Thessalonians 2:10-12)

[@analyst1777]

God created all of the problems you see on earth when he cast Satan down to the earth alone with all of his followers and still to this day he / she hasn't been able to clean that mess up. There is no question about who's running the earth 😀

[@michael9237]

​@@analyst1777 The problem is that Adam and Eve made a free will choice to rebel against God, follow Satan, and trust in a lie, and it is through their sin that our nature became corrupt. What do you mean God "hasn't been able to clean that mess up" - He is in control and you can't do anything unless He allows you to (Genesis 3:5). If God is Holy and Just then He has to punish sin, and He will... but the reason He allows evil to continue to exist in the world temporarily is because you are evil, and He delayed Judgment Day to give you a chance to repent. You are very fortunate. "But God is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish, but for all to reach repentance" (2 Peter 3:9).

[@analyst1777]

@@michael9237 If you erased satan from the Genesis story there isn't any logical reason to believe mankind would have ever fell. There would be no lie and they would have never even known evil. The book of Enoch even teaches what fallen evils fallen angels taught mankind I will agree with you somewhat he is in control in the sense that Satan has to get permission to convince people to rape, murder, cause war, sickness and destroy the Earth from God just like in the story of Job.

[@michaelling2477]

@@analyst1777 Not every act of evil originates from Satan nor the fallen angelic host. Evil also originates from the free will of those who choose to do wickedly, e.g. not every murder originates from Satan as people can freely choose to murder from their own impulses.. The importance of the Millennial Reign of Christ in the present creation at the end of the age is a necessity for in that time (era) Christ will reign supreme over fallen and redeemed humans while Satan and the fallen host are bound. At the end of the reign Satan will be unbound and there will still be those who choose of their free will driven by their desires in opposition to Christ to follow Satan thus negating the Devil made me do it (I am a product of my environment) mentality which seeks to place the blame elsewhere but upon one's self.

[@robertklotz9319]

1:26... If we see the spirals of the galaxies which are 2 million years away from us, then we receive a 2 million year old picture. The galaxy in reality is much different than we see now. That's clear as water. In 2 million years we will see how it looks today.

[@tagiilimaesene6261]

“For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be wise, they became fools,” (Rom. 1:20-22 NKJV)

[@lindawhite6635]

Amen!! Amen and Amen!!!!

[@no-yp4ts]

Amen !

[@bluenose7984]

Why would an all loving being require that we worship them? It's soooo egotistical!

[@no-yp4ts]

@@bluenose7984 He never told nobody, you mast warship Him. Who you love , you warship too. But one rebel love only himself and nobody ellse. This person is really egoistic . By the way ,do you love your parents ?

[@bluenose7984]

@@no-yp4ts Worship is not love, we love our family and friends but this being needs to be worshipped which is fanatical love!

[@gospeljohn413]

Wonderfully done, my hats off to this production and I praise God for the inspiration to all those who contributed. God bless you all

[@gospeljohn413]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 lol , the vast greatness of God cannot be questioned by mortal man, God is Spirit. I trust the word of God over any science, we could not have science if not for God and His Bible. I believe the Bible and take every word of it literally and if that makes me a fool then I’m a fool for the Lord God. This explanation makes perfect sense on how it was all done by God. But then Gods word tells us God will confound the wisest. Thanks for your input, I will pray that your heart will open your mind to God and not so much on man. God bless

[@danielthomas5212]

are you an ethnic jew?

[@bicycleutopia]

which god??

[@gospeljohn413]

@@bicycleutopia , there is only one true God. LOL

[@mehallica666]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 A bit late, but excellent post, dude.

[@Tee_Jay_Seas]

I really enjoyed watching this. Not at all what I expected. Glad to see a non-conventional explanation that makes more sense than conventional "Scientific" theories. 👍🏻👍🏻

[@Lionsgate88844]

Fascinating..something so complex explained as ABC.. Love it ❤

[@TheKurtChaney]

Look up the movement of dirt and rock in Louisiana when a drilling rig on a lake drilled into a salt dome. It made a 12 mile long canal in reverse and a 100ish foot water fall.

[@markterzano8962]

I lived in Baton Rouge, where is the lake drilled you are talking about? Is it Avery Island? I would like to look it up on Google Earth. Thanks.

[@---yu7ff]

@@markterzano8962 Lake Peigneur, 1980

[@thatjoeguy7348]

@@markterzano8962 Lake Peigneur, there's an episode on Engineering Disasters about the accident with video. Pretty wild stuff, glad no one was hurt.

[@marivanderlinde2026]

History is His story!

[@kimmyle0]

AMENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN

[@ashantiberenice5798]

periodt!!!!

[@cindysimpson1448]

This was definitely an eye opener into the complex world that our Lord God created! I loved listening and could not put my phone down until the end! ❤

[@Sunnytrailrunner]

Hi Cindy, If you ever have the opportunity to watch this on a laptop (even a small one), many scenes are quite visual, like the scenes of the Grand Canyon & others. I watched from an older iPad that my son gave me for Christmas 4 yrs ago. May God richly bless you & your loved ones.

[@Sunnytrailrunner]

To anyone interested, “THE ARK & THE DARKNESS,” a NEW BIBLICALLY BASED MOVIE being released for 2 days only, will be shown in theaters on March 20th & 21st, 2024 (DATES MAY BE DIFFERENT) depending on your location.

[@vivianszczepankowski9803]

Thank you for creating this film! Very good and faith promoting.

[@williamcavanagh8982]

I am certain promoting faith was the idea ...and had little to do with objectivity or truth.

[@joteirlinck4778]

unfortunately, promoting faith, isn't science more important than believing?

[@michaelg377]

@@joteirlinck4778 Do you say that because you believe in the modern mythology that fish evolve into philosophers? Science is a methodology; what you're talking about is an Ideology, that's not "science," that's something else. Let me ask you this... As an evolutionist, *how do you believe male and female evolved?* Charles Darwin gave a testable hypothesis for the validity of his theory, saying "if an organ were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down..." and he didn't have access to the fields of genetics or microbiology when he made up his theory. *If evolution is true, then how did male and female evolve?* Before you answer, consider that we're talking about *two separate, yet interdependent sets of organs* that had to evolve "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" (Darwin) and which are precision tuned with numerous single-points of failure. You have to explain the *organs* in keeping with this testable hypothesis. For example: The fallopian tubes are lined with millions of these little hairs that all wave the same direction, and their purpose is to guide the egg from the ovaries down into the uterus. If they stood still, laid flat, waved the wrong direction, or didn't exist - the egg would either die or it would implant in the fallopian tube thus killing the mother. Some of these are known medical conditions that prevent pregnancy - "Evolution" had to get these millions of hairs just right.... "by numerous, successive, slight modifications." *Simultaneously* the sperm has a whip like rotor, a motor encasing, a bushing like material, a nutrient transfer system, and several other components that all have to be working *just right* or the sperm can't find the egg. Reproduction and life fails. "Evolution" had to get the interdependent parts of the sperm "just right" ... "by numerous, successive, slight modifications." *Then* you have the placenta which does everything for the baby including keeping the mother's and baby's blood separate, the expanding and contracting uterus and cervix, the mechanism which only allows one sperm into the egg, and numerous other components that all had to be *designed* just right, or reproduction and life fails. "Evolution" had to *SIMULTANEOUSLY* get all of these just right "by numerous, successive, slight modifications." Which gender evolved first, and how did it reproduce while the other hadn't evolved yet? And going backwards in time, which of these critical organs do you gradually reduce first "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" while still enabling functional reproduction? *'So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them."* (Genesis 1:27)

[@00Uglyduckling00]

Fantastic production, thank you!

[@leejones2503]

Truly moving & possibly THE GREATEST documentary ive ever watched ,,loved evrything about it the music the animals the birds singing in the final stages ,,what a great programme ,,may god bless you 4 this and may i say THANKYOU,,for inspiring me & lifting my weary soul in a world filld with darkness this made me smile

[@javiermgtaoism5702]

I came across this documentary a few years back and wished that I had recorded it. Now is back and I am doing just that, for future reference. Thanks for uploading it again.

[@rosefenton3005]

Please show me how I may record it to watch later. I am elderly.

[@javiermgtaoism5702]

@@rosefenton3005 There may be a way to record but I use a software that I purchased. Sorry.

[@robertashcraft1360]

@@javiermgtaoism5702 What is the software, stuff like this is invaluable, but I have a lot of gray hair so it has to be relatively simple, thanks in advance.

[@javiermgtaoism5702]

@@robertashcraft1360 I am not an advertiser and hope it will not be interpreted as spam. The software is called 'Wondershare Uniconverter'. It costs about 39 US dollars for a years subscription. I have downloaded hundreds of videos and movies with it.

[@briansturner]

Please pay the Author guys, Thou Shalt Not Steal.

[@s3v3n3]

Wow! Like a glass of cold water on a hot day, this documentary is really refreshing in this world that's progressively turning against God and becoming so spiritually lost and losing its grip on reality. Very professional, good production that's not stale or monotone, challenging the naturalist and evolutionist worldview, and providing feasible evidence supported in every field of science from geology, microbiology, paleontology, biology, etc. Great work!! ❤👍🏾

[@elwee97]

I agree, I just watched it with my husband. Wow..it leaves us speechless for now. We are even more impressed by the countless puzzle pieces that fit into each other so perfectly🥲. (Blessings from The Netherlands)

[@lesliechristensen6974]

The Cicadas sound awesome there...as I am watching this outside...listening to Cicadas here in Florida.

[@gallo916]

I have learned so much more about science and history and archeology listening to all these videos than I did in school .

[@Paul-hl8yg]

These videos spew total rubbish.. Creationism & Genesis are completely false. Evolution is real!

[@martinwoodworth3715]

@@Paul-hl8yg There are missing links. This video states changes via evolution, but only changes within a species. The thing I'm confused by is the Earth being 6000 years old when ancient trees exist that have rings showing 20,000 years. So Bible says 6000 years yet there is clear proof of 20,000 years at the very least. I know carbon 14 dating is a mess for dates beyond 20,000 years.

[@Paul-hl8yg]

@@martinwoodworth3715 Creationism is false, utterly & completely false! .. The Earth is millions of years old, the sun older than the Earth & the Universe 13.7 billion years old. All these are facts, that have been studied. The data that makes these figures, come from many sources. Evolution is completely true & again, many sciences all come together for this. The whale, for instance.. We have found fossil evidence that they once walked on land. We have found transitional fossils, creatures that once lived & were ancestors of the whales. Whales are mammals, they breath air, like all mammals. Even their tail bones show, that they once walked, not swam! All fish have gills & do not breath air like mammals. Fish tails always go from side to side. Yet all the mammals in the seas, their tales go up & down. The bones in those aquatic mammal, show ankles, knees etc, that have elongated & changed for swimming. There are microscopic creatures living on our eyelashes, which clean them. They eat the debris on the lashes. Since the invention of mascara, these creatures have evolved. Everytime someone uses mascara, the creatures start to die off. However before they do, the last eggs laid, hatch with their digestive systems changed, to only eat mascara! Then, when the person stops using mascara, the same happens again, but the creatures have adapted their digestive system, to only eat the normal debris again. This is evolution in action, a creature adapting to its environment physically, for existence. There is no proof or verifiable evidence for any of the worlds deities, none, zero! Yet an abundance of data, proof & verified evidence for the old Earth & for Evolution!

[@martinwoodworth3715]

@@Paul-hl8yg If carbon 14 dating can't be trusted beyond 20,000 years I want to know how they date rocks to be 4.5 billion years. I'm very open minded & not a Christian. I am spiritual & love science. Science is our ability to understand our surroundings. Bible talks of beings living 800 years, these were aliens. They messed with our dna theory is very interesting theory too.

[@Paul-hl8yg]

@@martinwoodworth3715 Also, always always remember.. Anything that claims to be a "god", is not worthy of that title! And, if such a great being actually existed, surely it couldn't just exist? Surely 'it' had to have a beginning? Surely 'it' had a parent/s or species to belong to itself? Firstly Man invented gods, then they decided there must only be 'one'. Why? The Pharaoh Akhanaten was the first in recorded history to claim, there was only One (the Aten) & the word spread. Then people, later to become "Jews", carried that forth, making their own religion, with their own "one god". Plagiarism is rife within religion!

[@starboard6372]

This is the best audio quality I've ever heard on my little laptop! THANK YOU!!

[@grantbennett333]

Is the earth..flat ? Since curvature can't be proven

[@lesliechristensen6974]

Music. Early Genesis. GREAT MUSIC. Peter Gabriel AND Phil Collins. GREAT STUFF.

[@mmgrevenenterprises5625]

A wonderful presentation! Thank you so much!

[@alarmman961]

What a fantastic example of truth. So well done, I think I’m going to watch it again. God is GREAT !!

[@michael9237]

I agree. We are all *Uncritically Indoctrinated* into an Atheistic-Naturalist worldview (abiogenesis, particles to man evolution, etc.), but praise God that some are still capable of critical thinking and can see beyond the indoctrination. Science is a methodology. Atheistic-Naturalism is an Ideology. Science and Naturalism are not the same thing. This is a matter of competing worldviews over the same evidence and you have to evaluate the worldviews to determine which one more rationally handles the evidence. For example, *did you know that atheistic-Naturalists unavoidably have to invoke Supernatural phenomena in order to "naturally" (atheistically) explain our universe, most of them just aren't aware of it?* The first law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to come into existence from nothing. The 2nd law of thermodynamics doesn't allow energy to remain usable forever. If the universe can't have a beginning, and if it can't last forever, then how do you "naturally" explain the beginning of the universe? Atheistic-Naturalists have no choice but to invoke *supernatural* phenomena that supersede our observable laws of nature: *Infinite* alternate universes, an *eternal self-existent* singularity, alternate *unobservable* metaphysical laws of nature, or a "quantum fluctuation" that causes entire universes to pop into existence which requires space-time to be *pre-existent* . *This is the amoral atheist God: Infinite, eternal, pre-existent, unobservable...* The only way for nature to create itself is if nature is *pre-existent* (a Supernatural quality). And it is on this "supernatural" foundation that atheistic-Naturalists assert that everything in the unobservable past must be "Naturally" explainable. They claim everything is only "natural" and extrapolate that assumption backwards an incredible 14 billion years, but then begin to invoke Super-Natural solutions at the foundation of their worldview. Atheistic-Naturalists invalidate their own "natural" assumptions, and therefore every theory they fabricated based on those assumptions (evolution, big bang, abiogenesis, etc.). Internal inconsistency is a sign of a faulty worldview. Internal inconsistency is an atheistic-Naturalist (evolutionist) problem, not a problem for a biblical worldview. Supernatural God + Supernatural Creation Event = Internally Consistent, and *all of the best evidences of evolution can also be explained by Genesis 1-12.* And you can't hide behind "we just don't know the answers yet and that's okay" - because *we do know.* The laws of nature actively point to the beginning of the universe being a "natural" impossibility, so in order to assert "we just don't know yet" you have to actively ignore the evidence in blind hope of finding a more atheist-friendly explanation later on. That's cognitive bias.

[@michael9237]

Those things I pointed out are not "science" (a methodology) - they are part of the Atheistic-Naturalist worldview (an ideology)... it's a religion. *Did you know that the Theory of Evolution (and atheistic-Naturalism in general) shares characteristics of a religion?* Not just saying that, it's a fact. In Arkansas, a 1982 federal court ruled that Creationism can't be taught in schools because "it is not falsifiable." With its history of rewriting itself every time we discover a new problem with it, what would it take to "falsify" evolution today? Maybe hundreds of Living fossils? Or allegedly millions of year extinct creatures still alive today? Finding fully developed vertebrates in the Cambrian explosion? Discovering that numerous vestigial (leftover) organs actually have a normal purpose, like the appendix? Finding an alleged 70 million year extinct evolutionary predecessor to land-dwelling mammals still alive today with no signs of evolution (the Coelacanth)? Young soft tissues in a growing number of dinosaur fossils that appear similar to 4000 year old mummies and the Tyrolean ice man? *Did you know that secular scientists recently debunked evolutionist claims of "junk DNA"?* Or should we just reinterpret all of these problematic evidences *in order to sustain the Atheistic-Naturalist belief in abiogenesis and evolution?* Is this really how "science" (a methodology) is supposed to work, or is this more about your agenda of attempting to explain our origins without God? In contrast to modern evolutionists, Charles Darwin met the gold standard of modern science and gave a testable hypothesis for the validity of his theory, saying "if an *organ* were discovered which could not possibly be explained by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down..." and he didn't have access to the fields of genetics or microbiology when he made up his theory. *If evolution is true, then how did male and female evolve?* Now be careful, the usual evolutionist rescuing devices of "algae," "asexual organisms," "alleles," and "populations" just don't answer the question here - you have to explain the critical *organs* in these separate, yet interdependent, precision tuned "all or nothing" biological systems "by numerous, successive, slight modifications." Going backwards in the evolutionary narrative, which of these critical organs do you gradually reduce first? And if they did evolve "by numerous, successive, slight modifications" then which gender evolved first and how did it reproduce while the other hadn't evolved yet? *"All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"* (Romans 3:23) *"The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of people, who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them."* (Romans 1:18-19)

[@michael9237]

Definition of Science: "the intellectual and practical *activity encompassing the systematic study* of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through *observation and experiment."* [ie. a methodology] Definition of Naturalism: "the *philosophical belief that everything arises from natural properties and causes,* and *supernatural or spiritual explanations are excluded* or discounted." Science and Naturalism are demonstrably not the same thing. You are erroneously conflating the two. QED Indeed.

[@ozowen]

Mikley appears keen to present his ignorance on science all over these threads.

[@Hannestv4607]

*The ETERNAL GOD would do anything for you!!* Even out of love for you he went to the cross as a human!! Philippians 2:5-8

[@GodsentJesustosaveus]

Watched the DVD last night. Outstanding! Glad it's on KZbin; saved it as the first video in my KZbin 5 Star Documentaries playlist.

[@Gamefan86]

Christianity began as sun worship, the stories about Jesus are symbolic. He is just a personification of the sun, made into a god figure later on. The sun "dies" for 3 days on December 22nd, the winter solstice, when it stops its movement south, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th, when it resumes its movement north. In some areas, the calendar originally began in the constellation of Virgo, and the sun would therefore be "born of a Virgin" The sun rising in the morning is "the saviour of mankind" The sun is "The light of the World" The sun "walks on water" is just the reflection of the sun on water/the sea. "He cometh on clouds, and every eye shall see him", is just sun rays. Jesus' "crown of thorns" is just the sun's glare, also know as a halo. The sun's "followers", "helpers" or "disciples" are the 12 months and the 12 signs of the zodiac or constellations, through which the sun must pass. The sun at 12 noon is in the house or temple of the "Most High": thus.."he" begins "his Father's work" at "age" 12. The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30 degrees, hense, the "Sun of God" begins his ministry at "age" 30. The sun is hung on a cross or "crucified", which represents its passing through the equinoxes. The vernal equinox being Easter, at which time it is then resurrected. The reason why saviour myths are so similar with a godman who is crucified and resurrected, who does miracles and has 12 disciples, is that these stories were based on the movements of the sun through the heavens, an astrotheological development that can be found throughout the planet, because the sun and the 12 zodiac signs can be observed around the globe. In other words, Jesus Christ and all the others upon whom this character is predicated are personifications of the sun, and the Gospel fable is merely a rehash of a mythological formula revolving around the movements of the sun through the heavens. Jesus is a fictional allegory for the sun. Christianity is ancient astrology. It's just fables about the sun. Check out Acharya S aka D.M Murdock for more info. .. .. .

[@jonsweetland6527]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 so, Alessandro cites two ideas that challenge the "evolution myth", and you immediately misrepresent his argument to say that he meant to use these ideas to support "Young Earth Creationism". you are disingenuous, a deceiver and an over-educated fool who wastes time responding to people to whom he supposes to condescend. if, indeed, you are well educated why not concisely explain why evolution is not a "myth"? you know, how it is that evolution is not a traditional story, concerning early history or explaining some natural phenomenon, involving supernatural beings or events?

[@jonsweetland6527]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 so to be clear here's what i believe: i believe you are a poor logician and a disingenuous arguer. incapable of responding to direct questions, you posit suppositions regarding those whose logic and inquiry you are ill-prepared to answer. in short, you are an internet troll according to the current vernacular. my "place to begin" is right here. rather than pontificating about your puesdo-scientific dogma and citing irrelevant gov't support for your dogma, why don't you address my original question. define "evolution" as you wish to consider it here, and then explain how it is not a "myth" as i have defined it previously.

[@OfficialPiggy]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 evolution is only a theory. in fact, I read in an article that it’s disproved by the second law of thermodynamics

[@jess65963]

@@nicholaschristie-blick3139 Nicholas!! My favourite grandson's name. Having said that, I do agree with you and your knowledge. It fascinates me right from the earliest beginnings of earth. Through no fault of mine, I was raised in a religious cult. I was rebellious and disagreeable. Something inside of me as a youth said, " It ain't necessarily so." Pardon the grammar. Long story shortened, my family, Mother, Father and 5 siblings were thrown out of the cult with a box of food and nowhere to live. Godly people doing godly cleansing????? Now I am almost 80 years old ☺️. I aknowledge parts of the Bible in it's historical information. But........ Way off hundreds of thousands of years in many other respects. The guy with the navy blue sweater and blue jeans is talking TWADDLE. Where is his proof? No offense.

[@friedvegetables3455]

Very cool that this doc has 5 million views already in less than 4 years.

[@DiodeMom]

“Time is not a magic wand that solves all the geologic problems of the world!” Well I’m definitely using that statement in the future. Love this video. Thank you.

[@5winder]

The whole bible is history... with the whole truth --- unlike what we were taught in "school".

[@DonnieTHORMacLEOD]

He did say in Revelations that the knowledge of man would speed up in the latter days & that He would reveal Himself to those who didn't believe by that knowledge . What better way then proving Himself to be the creationist in the growth of proof that He is allowing our modern Scientists to embrace such as with Francis Collins Faith that God created it all & now attending Church as a Christian after decades of being an obnoxious atheist as he once was. .