Antarctica 24-hour Sunlight Timelapse VR

[@stevenelliott216]

Cool video. The 360 really adds to it. I wish it was a little clearer to see the sun better, but I realize the weather is what it is.

[@antzkiwi]

Mostly the cameras with the small sensors just can't handle the highlights and blows everything out with the slightest hint of cloud. Will definitely try this again with a high-end set-up if I get the chance.

[@stevenelliott216]

​@@antzkiwi thanks for the reply. I know I'm just a random person commenting and you're the one actually doing the work, but here are some random suggestions for future videos. If you can share the exact coordinates and exact time it can help folks who want to defend the video by looking it up in programs like Stellarium to see that it's correct. But you be the judge - I wouldn't want to put your camera at risk by revealing its location. It would be neat if you filmed at a time that the moon was in the sky. It would be an additional interesting data point: www.timeanddate.com/moon/antarctica/south-pole It looks like that camera does not take filters, but maybe you could get a neutral density film and tape it on. I know the processing takes a while, but could you record like 48 hours and then pick 24 hours in it when there were the least clouds?

[@antzkiwi]

@@stevenelliott216 Shot at Scott Base as stated, coordinates easily found on google maps. I'm not in Antarctica now, so can't shoot anything new in the immediate future. I did a tracking video (not 360) recently that ran for 6 days straight, have yet to get around to making it into a video, will get to it when time permits. Have a look at the video I posted for the Canterbury Astronomy Society if you want to do a deeper dive into it all.

[@IuliusAnacyclus]

"What you see here is a mirage"

[@williamwhite2535]

Without knowledge of this technology, it seems to me you could've just taken one of these cameras and placed it on the ground facing straight up and you'd get the same effect, more or less. You'd lose the ability to look down lower than the horizon though, obviously. This way the fe people would shut up about 'seams' lol. Also, maybe if some sort of tint was applied to the lense, the sun's brightness wouldn't be so disruptive to the footage being taken. Just spit-balling here lol. Thank you for the time and effort behind producing this for us to view, by the way.

[@FNARproductions]

Would work but these kinds of shots arent taken to try and disprove FE. They would just claim its edited anyway because it dosen't fit their narritive. FE dont have enough credibility to ba taken serious by actual scientist, and the simple fact that all our science can be tested and repeated should be enough for non-retarded people.

[@thefarcountry]

@@FNARproductions This same inveigler / dissimulator, Anthony Powell, has made several inept attempts to manufacture a convincing "24 hour Antarctica sun" video over the years. In his video _"Flat Earth Debunked: A Time Lapse of the 24 Hour Sun in Antarctica"_ one is immediately disturbed by the astonishingly phony looking sun. Upon closer inspection one cannot help but notice the unnatural looking absolutely static sun rays emanating off the sun (sun rays normally flicker and dance, becoming longer and shorter with each passing millisecond ~ these things don't budge throughout the entire video). The indisputable proof of its being an ill-conceived fraudulent deception comes when you capture a still-frame of the sun, put it in any version of a PC photo studio, and simply decrease the light levels down to where the clumsy copy/paste job magically appears... The duplicity should be obvious to everyone. Anyone who would like to see some of Powell's diabolical dirty-work thoroughly exposed should view the following video: _"Antarctica Secrets - Antarctica 24 Hour Sun Is 100% Fake | Must Watch"_ kzbin.info/www/bejne/i6vHlqCjjc2UpsU In this video examples #1 thru #5 are photographs of the real sun being critically examined and analyzed ~ example #6 is the fake sun.

[@FNARproductions]

@@thefarcountry Hahaha! Just saw the vid you linked and thats the worst "detective work" ive ever seen xD You do realise that didnt prove anything right? Just that the screenshot he took of the youtube vid had alot less information than the photographs he found. The sun's rays are caused by the camera lens witch is why it appears static compares to what your eyes see when looking at the sun. And his last point is just him being stupid. When you look at something bright, the source appears bigger than what it actually is. Try taking a pic of the sun with high exposure, then take a pic with low exposure. Now did the sun change size between pictures ordoes it just appear that way? So yes the sun's diameter was smaller than the tripod legs.

[@eduardoxenofonte4004]

riddle me this, flat earth lunatics: you understand that south of the equator, we get more daylight in december and less in june, the opposite of the northern hemisphere, right? you also understand that the further south you go, this effect gets stronger, the difference between december and june gets bigger and bigger, right? then why shouldn't there be a point where we reach absoluteness: at the poles, december has 24 hours of daylight, june has none! you suggest that there is a point where the difference between december and june just stops? i'd like to hear that theory

[@Whale-of-a-time]

Very cool Anthony, I like the 360

[@Chiefpigloo]

wow, the clouds book surreal in time lapse

[@cornkobmansanto17]

What a damn cool channel. So happy to have stumbled upon it.

[@eduardoxenofonte4004]

riddle me this, flat earth lunatics: you understand that south of the equator, we get more daylight in december and less in june, the opposite of the northern hemisphere, right? you also understand that the further south you go, this effect gets stronger, the difference between december and june gets bigger and bigger, right? then why shouldn't there be a point where we reach absoluteness: at the pole, december has 24 hours of daylight, june has none! you suggest that there is a point where the difference between december and june just stops? i'd like to hear that theory

[@eduardoxenofonte4004]

@@aurevoirugootubee3927 it is quite east to just say that, you know? do you have any proper arguments?

[@BigBoaby-sg1yo]

@@eduardoxenofonte4004because of the suns Analemma .

[@ErickMcNerney]

I'm really curious - were you there? If I would have seen the clouds start moving in the opposite direction at 31 seconds, I would have flipped out. I'm really wanting to learn video editing, so I'd love to see a tutorial on how you put this video together. Is it some kind of composite? Is the sky like an AI generated sky? I'm fascinated by this.

[@antzkiwi]

It is basically straight out of an off-the shelf consumer level 360 VR camera, which has two 180 degree fisheye cameras back to back then automatically stitches the two images together, hence the visible vertical joins on opposite sides of the image at times. There are much better VR cameras available now at reasonable prices that do a better job.

[@chipelter]

An AI generated sky? It’s a real-life video… it’s a time-lapse of a 24 hour long recording in the Antarctic. So it’s 24 hours of video sped up to be a minute and a half long.

[@jameshuff9726]

Happens all the time. It's just a lot slower when it's not in time lapse. Just look up at the sky once in a while. Clouds change direction often.

[@chipelter]

@@shamaYahu8635 okay?? OP / the person I replied to *did* seem to question if it was a real video. Curious, why are you questioning the legitimacy of the location?

[@chipelter]

@@shamaYahu8635 right... so you just commented to make no sense and then... dip?

[@_zproxy]

neat. how about a 360 timelapse of the midnight moon

[@antzkiwi]

I did not manage to get the 360 camera to keep working in the winter cold. I did manage a regular 360 tracking shot of the winter moon over 24hrs though. It is in the (long) queue of things I have to edit into videos.

[@kartonbaba]

this is really cool. i wish I could see this in person

[@hulkflattt7854]

Most people are looking up for proof of CGI or editing of the video As a Flat Earther i normally don't look up for evidence of Earth being flat I look down and around If you point the camera down and watch You will notice that the shadow never goes all the way around conveniently and rocks on the ground just move and disappear at 0:29 0:34

[@AdamRangiaho]

omg.....nice try but sorry...but ur argument gets a big FAIL!!!!....'cause if you look UP from 0:18 to 0:34 you will definitely see the Sun's rays going blocked by a band of clouds.....during which time the shadows being cast by the camera stand dims and disappears 'cause the clouds block the Sun's rays........ the same thing happens 24/7 everywhere on planet earth when the clouds block direct sunlight.... you say, "As a Flat Earther i normally don't look up for evidence of Earth being flat I look down and around...." buddy,.....you need to be looking EVERYWHERE!!! and if you to were look up in the southern hemisphere, you would see a completely different sets of stars to the Northern constellations move around the South Celestial Pole all night...... if you live in the Northern Hemisphere, you will never see the Southern Cross in the night sky 365 days of the year....its only ever possible to see it from a maximum position of 25 deg north of the equator in the Northern Hemisphere in May/June every year.....this is when the Earth's is approaching the S.H. winter/ N.H. summer equinox and the Sun gets to its maximum height in the Northern summer sky, and it's lowest height in the Southern Winter sky.......this is when the whole Southern Cross becomes visible, rising just above the horizon for a few hours.......meanwhile... simultaneously, at the same exact time in the Southern Hemisphere, it's visible all night long... starting from a vertical position, the upright cross can be observed rotating around the South Celestial Pole.....and after exactly 12 hours, it's rotated exactly 180 deg and is now an inverted cross....i.e. upside down, and still visible over the horizon.......but.....in May/June, down under, there's STILL 2.5 hours of darkness to go so it will rotate another 1/6th of the path back to the upright cross....... Hawaii is sits very close to same latitudinal line as NZ does, so when its dark and the cross is vertical, that same cross being observed on the Hawaiian horizon is also in the vertical position from the NZ location....BUT.... its nowhere near the horizon ever, or up higher close to the zenith.....it continuously rotates around and around.... from the vertical to inverted position.....365 nights of the year.....no exceptions!!!! EVER!!!! you remain a flatard 'cause you look down at the dirt your head is buried in LOOK UP!!!!.....DONT LOOK DOWN....lmfao....hope you have learned something today....you're welcome...

[@hulkflattt7854]

@@AdamRangiaho thanks for the thumbs up!

[@mrandersen6872]

It literally does go all the way around. It gets cloudy for part of the day so you can't clearly see shadows, but if you stare at a rock right in front of the camera, you can clearly see the shadow do a full 360 around the rock. Earth isn't flat dude.

[@Bnslamb]

Read his offer in the description and be the first to record a December sunset in Antarctica.

[@Bnslamb]

@@hulkflattt7854 Read his offer in the description and be the first to record a December sunset in Antarctica.

[@jesusislukeskywalker4294]

it looks like the sun appears to set at 5:00 where did it go ?

[@antzkiwi]

It doesn't. it's just a crappy camera with poor dynamic range, so it gets washed out with the clouds.

[@Ty-Oga]

Why it isn't showing the sun

[@antzkiwi]

Because it was done with a small sensor auto-exposure camera as a bit of a test to see how it would perform, and whenever there is even a hint of cloud pretty much all the highlights get blown out.

[@rozeyrose392]

Why don't you know how camera lenses work

[@jimmyed1556]

Because there is none, it disappears for a while, and then you have light, but no sun. The effects of the firmament cause this.

[@tanyah.1054]

The irony is that those who are anti-flat-earth are actually being religious in the name of science (laughing at those who think differently, being rigid in their belief system, afraid of new or different perspectives), and those who are stepping out on faith in exploring flat earth theory are actually being scientific (open to new ideas, challenging anything that hasn’t been perfectly proven, examining more closely, testing commonly held beliefs in pursuit of greater truth, considering alternate theories, etc!).

[@eduardoxenofonte4004]

it's much the opposite, actually, flat-earthers are the stubborn ones, even though they've been disproven countless times, they still say everyone else is wrong and they are right with arrogant confindence

[@Dburke267]

@@eduardoxenofonte4004 false.

[@eduardoxenofonte4004]

@@Dburke267 it's quite easy to just say "false", isn't it?

[@AdamRangiaho]

nice try but sorry...but ur argument gets a big FAIL!!!!....'flatbeds are NOT EVER open too examining any fact that 100% proves a globe.....all universally accepted globe proofs have been debated to death for thousands of years....there are ZERO flattard "proofs" that are new......NOTHING!!!! and globe proofs are so tight, they can be tested and measured and calculated to the point where sun sets and sun rises for the entire earth are 100% accurately measured to the second...for any position on the globe....and if, like you say, these flat heads are "being scientific" you're 100% wrong...scientists accept ideas as fact only when they are able to be verified by other scientists by way of accurate prediction, observation and repeatable experiment that produces the exact same result every time.....and once even a single globe proof proven to debunk the flat earth is presented to a flatty, they are not able to either understand the science or they invent or fabricate make believe pseudoscience nonsense..and thats NOT science...because science , in this matter, has definitively proven without a doubt that the earth is round.....there are dozens of scientific proofs for the globe and they all stand up.....and scientifically speaking, as soon as a flatbread proof is debunked, or as soon as its apparent 2 or 3 proofs are debunked, or ALL not them form that matter, it means 100% the earth is not flat......thats the scientific way.....one such example of a major flaw in the flatbread model has to do with the southern skies....24 hour sun in Antartica aside,.....when u look up in the southern hemisphere, you see a completely different sets of stars to the Northern constellations move around the South Celestial Pole all night...... if you live in the Northern Hemisphere, you will never see the Southern Cross in the night sky 365 days of the year....its only ever possible to see it from a maximum position of 25 deg north of the equator in the Northern Hemisphere in May/June every year.....this is when the Earth's is approaching the S.H. winter/ N.H. summer equinox and the Sun gets to its maximum height in the Northern summer sky, and it's lowest height in the Southern Winter sky.......this is when the whole Southern Cross becomes visible, rising just above the horizon for a few hours.......meanwhile... simultaneously, at the same exact time in the Southern Hemisphere, it's visible all night long... starting from a vertical position, the upright cross can be observed rotating around the South Celestial Pole.....and after exactly 12 hours, it's rotated exactly 180 deg and is now an inverted cross....i.e. upside down, and still visible over the horizon.......but.....in May/June, down under, there's STILL 2.5 hours of darkness to go so it will rotate another 1/6th of the path back to the upright cross....... Hawaii is sits very close to same latitudinal line as NZ does, so when its dark and the cross is vertical, that same cross being observed on the Hawaiian horizon is also in the vertical position from the NZ location....BUT.... its nowhere near the horizon ever, or up higher close to the zenith.....it continuously rotates around and around.... from the vertical to inverted position.....365 nights of the year.....no exceptions!!!! EVER!!!! people remain a flatard 'cause they look down at the dirt their feet like this guy commenting above......his head is buried in the dirt...all he needs to do is LOOK UP!!!!.....NOT LOOK DOWN....lmfao....scientists look EVERYWHERE..... pseudo scientists dont get cloudy days and shadows.....a scientific mind using scientific thinking would have instantly found out clouds block light that stops stick shadows from appearing on the ground....hope you have learned something today....you're welcome...

[@eduardoxenofonte4004]

@@AdamRangiaho read everything, i think the flat earthers have no place to run to now haha. the only mistake i found was that hawaii had a similar latitude to NZ, it does not, NZ is way farther south than hawaii is north

[@LBBstore]

Cool. Where's the Foucault pendulum?

[@catarinabrandao1108]

everywhere. all astronomy universities have one.

[@allehelgen]

@Alien Kill Squad Man, just make the computations. If the sun is going on a circle above us, the shape of the shadow on the ground projected by the sun via a planted stick would be a circle. I can help you with the maths if you struggle to demonstrate that, it's easy and as you are a great scientist, it shouldn't take you much time. Now, wait for summer, plant a stick (not too complex, so far ?), first take two pictures 12 hours apart (8am and 8pm for example). The pointy end of the two shadows you photographed are made 12 hours apart, so they must correspond to the diameter of the circle, as they are taken from half a rotation of the sun according to FE model. Now take as many pictures as you want in between these two (1 pm, 3pm, 5pm), the shadows WILL NEVER TRACE a circle. NEVER. I've done the test myself. Don't trust me ? Just DO IT YOURSELF, it'll take you 5 minutes TOPS, and then you can argue with other people who actually do the experiments, maths, and everything that allows you to post dumb comments while pooping using a technology you actually did nothing to ever help establish.

[@Vnifit]

Super cool video! Why are there so many flat-earther lunatics here? Thanks for posting.

[@andrewsinclair7159]

Because they have no lives.

[@forbiddenscience1970]

@@andrewsinclair7159 Hey Andrew! I am a flat earther and I do have a life. I am really hurt by your words tho. Please try to be kind to everybody even flat earthers. You never know you might meet one some day and realise they are quite nice people.....even if you dont agree with them.

[@andrewsinclair7159]

​@@forbiddenscience1970 I've met plenty and more often than not they call me a shill, a liar, a sheep, and an idiot. I'm more than willing to have a /rational/ discussion with someone who disagrees with me if they are,, but I see no reason to respond to unkindness with kindness. The only people that do that are "high road" people trying to assert moral superiority.

[@manowar2816]

I am here. What you seeing

[@forbiddenscience1970]

@@andrewsinclair7159 Im sorry that you have been insulted by some flat earthers. But is saying that all flat earthers 'have no lives' any better? That seems unkind. Naturally I am suspicious of any video claiming to show the 24hr sun in Antarctica as that would be difficult to reconcile with a flat stationary plane. But as you say it is difficult to engage with somebody who is insulting you. I'm sure you are a nice guy. I would never insult anybody for agreeing with the Globe model......I did for the first 32 years of my life. I do think that as videos of the 24hr sun go this isnt great quality. No offense meant.

[@jibberjabbz7593]

SOMETHING IS NOT RIGHT!!!! if this was taken with a 360 camera, then why when you look at the green buildings it looks like they where cropped together...

[@antzkiwi]

Because if you have ever used an all-in-one consumer 360 camera like the Samsung Gear 360, you would know it uses two 180 degree cameras back to back and automatically stitches the two images together. Usually resulting in slight variations in exposure between the two cameras and a slightly fuzzy join line. When you use the more expensive multi-camera rigs you can get nice clean images that are made up from 6 or more cameras, but takes a lot of rendering time on a computer to combine all the images together.

[@zzrzz6199]

Sun light is not the same as seeing the sun for 24 hours like in the north pole

[@stereotypo1]

What was it like for you on the south pole?

[@awatchman5945]

Crickets. Thats what i thought. A KP doesnt know 💩

[@Cash_McCoy]

And where, exactly, do you think that sunlight comes from???

[@zzrzz6199]

@@Cash_McCoy the sun is hollow..that is clear to anyones whose studied or works with the ionosphere...So a quick answer the is most likely transformer its light from some other dimension...short answer = no one knows. The sun and moon are known to be plasma. And plasma naturally emits light.

[@Cash_McCoy]

@@zzrzz6199 plasma...??? So I can take my telescope and zoom into the moon and see "plasma", which is a gas with some of it's electrons removed... a gas, that has mountains and craters??? And if the moon and sun are local, why is it that nobody has ever been up close to it floating around right above the Earth?

[@thebloodytruth5278]

No flat earthers are claiming that 24hrs of sunLIGHT isn't possible in the Antarctica, just not a 24hr sun visible ABOVE the horizon like we get in the north for a few days a year. Even this video doesn't hit the mark. Better luck next time.

[@kelduck8851]

Even if what you are stating is true that still debunks the flat earth. Here's a video where the sun just disappears for a short while behind a mountain, it never goes below the horizon. kzbin.info/www/bejne/j4LPo2Zsa8qYotU

[@thebloodytruth5278]

Kel Duck that, and every other attempt, has been debunked. The clouds are identical at the start and end of the time laps. kzbin.info/www/bejne/o3msXpqkj6xghqc

[@kelduck8851]

@@thebloodytruth5278 LOL, the editing of the shot has nothing to do with the most important fact. 24 hours of sunlight.

[@thebloodytruth5278]

Kel Duck 🤣if you say so....

[@thebloodytruth5278]

Kel Duck maybe you should start with the basics.... kzbin.info/www/bejne/qpaxn5hrn66JitE

[@jennifergeorgia5445]

So awesome. Thank you.

[@UKtilly]

I read your offer of reimbursement. Why not offer to pay for a "main" flat earth person rather than reimbursement. Throw out the offer to them by name here in KZbin and see if any will take up the offer of a free holiday. Jeranism I would hope would snap the offer up.

[@jennaluvsflatearth8303]

You know he would, and DIRTH, and BANJO, and any curve deniers…

[@TMesser74]

They would love the chance to go to Antarctica. But they will never get the chance because it will prove there is no 24 hour sun in Antartica, hence FE is true and that cant happen. If they really want to prove once and for all ball earth they would let people go down there, but there is too much to hide.

[@zixo5085]

@@TMesser74 هناك العديد من ذهبوا الى انتاركتيكا في جنوب القطبي و ليس هناك اي منع كما تقول، ربما ايدولوجيا الأرض المسطحة تدفعك الى قول ذلك. "مثير للشفقة"

[@theredpillsociety958]

@@TMesser74 If you are so confident that there is no midnight sun there then accept the challenge and take the free trip to Antarctica instead of making lame excuses. 🤣

[@mactallica9293]

​@jennaluvsflatearth8303 hahaha and now those guys are denying a free trip

[@_zproxy]

cool. do one for the moon

[@antzkiwi]

I didn't get a moon 360 VR shot, but I did manage a lunar equivalent of my 24hr sun tracking clip ( kzbin.info/www/bejne/eJi9kmylj6mBa8k ) that I have yet to put together into a video clip.

[@_zproxy]

it would be nice to have a 360 midnight moon 24h timelapse as it is at its southern scanline

[@eduardoxenofonte4004]

@@_zproxy midnight moon isnt all that rare bud, pretty sure you get at least 180 a year where you live

[@_zproxy]

@@eduardoxenofonte4004 in antartica

[@heavymetalnewsdesk]

Why are the clouds suddenly moving backwards?

[@peronkop]

...wind?

[@michaelakowskey2676]

I thought I was the only one to see that lol😂😂

[@van-hieuvo8208]

I'm not aware that clouds must move in one direction and only one direction.

[@heavymetalnewsdesk]

@@van-hieuvo8208 if you can't tell this is fake then there's no helping you

[@KING-em7yk]

Edited

[@justinvideo9485]

i can move the screnn

[@Knockaswagga]

Justin video me too🔥

[@andrewsinclair7159]

Yeah, it's a 360 degree camera that films in all directions at once.

[@lgcishrd_9073]

so cool!

[@michaeltrs2004]

any issues in the cold, need any housing? want to get a couple and try them out next summer

[@antzkiwi]

A lot of them have cold problems with batteries freezing. The main thing is being able to get them to run on a good reliable external power supply, once you do that 90% of the problems will disappear. Lead-acid batteries are the most reliable.

[@charlie2640]

When I was there we had old cameras. I remember rigging up external batteries for my camera and flash so I could take pictures inside Scott's hut on cape Evans and shackeltons hut. Ran a wire from a special fake battery I made into a real battery inside by parka. Worked well

[@vibemunster]

@Alien Kill Squad Wow man, you are real butt hurt, Anthony has already challenged you to prove him wrong and pay your expenses if you do so, be a man and take the challenge. The gauntlet has been laid.

[@tural9975]

Let a group of flat-worlders let them record videos of themselves. Then we'll see the truth

[@antzkiwi]

I have a standing offer to reimburse their travel expenses for any flat earther to take a cruise ship to the same location in Antarctica to prove the sun does not do as I show in my videos. A number have said they would, none have contacted me for a reimbursement.

[@antzkiwi]

@DATA on the PLANE There is lots of video information out there, I just get tired of re-posting it time and again for every person with 100 silly questions who does not understand basic physics or photography. Point any DSLR camera at the sun with the aperture set to f22 and you will get lens flares based on the number of segments that make up the aperture, the high aperture lets the camera keep both the landscape and watch in focus at the same time. There is even a video showing how it is done.

[@MemoryLane77852]

@Flat Earth Data the earth is not the size of Rhode Island just to let you know.

[@TheBeag1]

@@antzkiwi why is the sun stationary in the Antarctica or why,/ how does it have 24 hours daylight for few months of the year every year like clockwork, but at the same time the sun is still rising and setting in all other countries normally. How can this be? and the say Australia is at the bottom of the globe opposite the Antarctica. but there sun rises and sets just like in our country all day everyday without fail.

[@antzkiwi]

@@TheBeag1 This question is so bad on so many levels hurts my brain.

[@albertLAPOINTE]

La video n'est pas très explicite.

[@pablolegoff6207]

Qu'est-ce qui vous fait dire ça ? Je cherche également de mon côté s'il n'y a pas une arnaque dans cette vidéo. Je suis sceptique.

[@albertLAPOINTE]

@@pablolegoff6207 Un arnaque peut-être pas. Mais cette vidéo ne montre pas le soleil tourner autour du paysage, car la caméra est fixe. On doit deviner qu'il tourne en interprétant la luminosité. Il y a un truc louche l'ombre du poteau a une vitesse angulaire plus grande que l' ombre du caillou devant le poteau. il y a peut être un montage sans intention de tromper.

[@pablolegoff6207]

@@albertLAPOINTE c'est une vidéo à 360°, elle est interactive.vous n'avez pas dû faire attention.

[@FLATEARTHPERTH]

Anthony I 100% accept your challenge to go to Antarctica. I am available anytime. I have sent you an email. Can be packed and ready to go at a days notice.

[@antzkiwi]

I'm already going to be working there. Feel free to book yourself a ticket with Heritage Expeditions and it will take you to the same area.

[@mrlebosh]

@@shamaYahu8635you want him to hold your hand as well?

[@mrlebosh]

@@shamaYahu8635you know what ‘reimbursement’ means? 🤦‍♂️

[@mA-qy3ym]

🧢🧢🧢🧢🧢

[@MrWuhisn]

The sun is not tracked in view. This is not definitive. I cannot confirm the sun was in view for a full 24 hours. This is easily done for the arctic for even 72 hours. This is not do-able in the antarctic for it is but an ice wall around the plane of the earth.

[@catarinabrandao1108]

it's a VR vídeo... if your browser don't support this tech, use the cell phone app and you will see the sun.

[@jamiereimer7344]

Lol

[@MemoryLane77852]

Catarina Brandão, Flat earthers are bad with technology.

[@MemoryLane77852]

Alien Kill Squad, you flat earthers are just like the House Democrats crying for impeachment. Just like the House Democrats, you have no evidence.

[@Guitarman7133]

ANOTHER WOKE PERSON! I wish there was more like us.

[@jaypisme2343]

The whole reason it’s called Antarctica is because the sun makes an anti arc anti south of the equator and an arc north

[@gordontaylor4184]

That isn't the reason. Well done for trying though.

[@mynamemylastname7179]

That ground looks like itvis made out of Coal. Do you need help is mining it or better yet set on fire and melt Antarica😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣🤣😂

[@ceciLOVEtaco]

The sun is 150,000,000 kms from earth,as advised by NASA ?

[@24k-n6x]

dont think so.

[@phatsmall2007]

Calculated long before NASA existed

[@Viperwon]

NASA aka 2000 years ago

[@BigBoaby-sg1yo]

@@phatsmall2007 Copernicus thought it was 3million miles away . Kepler thought it was 12 million and Ricola thought it was 36 million miles away. The heliocentric model was based on erroneous assumptions.

[@phatsmall2007]

@@BigBoaby-sg1yo Incorrect... It depends on what technology to observes space object. The more advance the technology we have the more precise the measurement will be.

[@DeletedProgramming]

Try again... 😘

[@Bnslamb]

Try what? Record a December sunset in Antarctica? You could be the first to do that.

[@Bnslamb]

@@shamaYahu8635 I don't think DeletedProgramming is in Antarctica.

[@lilystaneva6835]

ℹ

[@kubush]

Flat earth debunked.... again.

[@awatchman5945]

kubush You wish ! This bs is obviously edited. Pay attention

[@kubush]

@@awatchman5945 No it isn't. The earth isn't fucking flat. Don't be an idiot.

[@mikikiki]

kubush how? This is a video of some fucking rocks

[@awatchman5945]

Kubush....A Slave of the mind.

[@awatchman5945]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fXOym4eoerSGeLM PROGRAMMING Kabush's mind. 😆 like a little computerized puppet.

[@teneerhodes2676]

Ain't it moving the wrong way 😂

[@antzkiwi]

It would be if it was the northern hemisphere, but when you are south of the equator, the sun moves right to left in the sky relative to the ground.

[@SwaaallaGE]

no

[@Jeckhart02]

Haha

[@jimmyed1556]

Nice try

[@tonymontana-kv4sr]

This is Arctica center of our world ...change titile , why are you fooling ?

[@antzkiwi]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z3jGdnaui56Cm6s

[@giftofthewild6665]

There's no rock or solid ground at the north pole (assume that is what you are referring to?) so this cannot be the north pole.

[@forbiddenscience1970]

@@giftofthewild6665 Quite right too.....

[@ErickMcNerney]

@@giftofthewild6665 The video was never claimed to be at the "poles". You don't need to be at the north pole to see a 24 hour sun. But there certainly doesn't seem to be rock or anything at Antarctica - it's the coldest place on earth. I don't know this Anthony Powell guy, but this video is obviously involving some kind of editing. You can see the clouds start going in the completely opposite direction between 25-32 seconds. If I saw that I'd be thinking some weird shit is going on. It's not real. I have just a little bit of video editing ability, and I'm able to merge a different sky to an unrelated ground from somewhere else. I'm sure with some more experience, that would be easy.

[@giftofthewild6665]

@flatearthlogic dot net Nope, not mixing anything up. Tony used the term "Arctica" and called it the "center of the world" which I assume means he's referring to the north pole (in the Arctic sea). ANTarctica is the continent on the south pole.