Canon R6 mark II vs Sony A7iv 📷 The BEST Camera?

[@michaelfigueroa.]

Whatever you say, I will still go with the A7IV because I already bought it and I have no other choice.

[@tylershirley6951]

😂😂 felt that

[@bikashtimalsina6459]

😂😂 same boat brother

[@hardikdhameliya3428]

Hahah it's overheat in video ??

[@dexterazarcon516]

same deym boat bruh

[@abuubaidah8735]

😅😅😢

Don't waste your time thinking about equipment. Focus on the creative aspects and the photos/videos themselves. Lots of people think they are into photography and/or filming but are not - they actually just love gear...

[@notchipotle]

true 🤣 I rarely use my camera, but always looking for a new accessories

[@HKFIJIHK]

Sadly some people claim they are photographers because they don’t care about gear and care about others gear…

[@HKFIJIHK]

@@TigaWould agreed. Out of the ones you’ve used. Is your preferred the R5 or something else? How did the R3 feel compared to the R5?

[@Imboredas]

There’s nothing wrong with loving gear. That’s just another genre of fun. But I agree that it may not be strictly photography.

[@mezza001]

For me, I end up using more of videography features than anything else with a camera that I have. So its a big consideration for me.

[@definingslawek4731]

A7iv is higher resolution and it also over samples so it’s a better oversample there. I’m glad canon is competing in this price segment. Lens lineup is a consideration though (no third party)

[@robert18productions]

@@TigaWould Stop excusing canon for terrible business practices. Saying Sony didn’t do it initially does not justify canon doing the same bad practices. Honestly, it makes canon look even worse. Canon has seen Sony’s success even with third party auto focus lenses and yet canon refused third party auto focus lenses.

[@ancogbernard]

cropped means it doesnt used 33mp. maybe it just used. 18mp. 🥴 canon used the entire 24 mp.

[@definingslawek4731]

@@TigaWould what was the point of that paragraph of 'they have a patent and they're allowed to do it' ? Nobody questions the patent, a business can obviously do what it wants with its products, it's just a silly decision. The customers lose out as a result

[@definingslawek4731]

@@TigaWould Making after market products that work with other products is hardly violating patent law. There's nothing special about canons mount/lens communication. It's anti consumer, bad faith and even a little strange to me marketing wise... if the canon lenses are so good, why are they concerned about some 'lowly third party' I do hope canon remains competitive and popular though as competition is great for all of us.

[@definingslawek4731]

@@ancogbernard You're right :) I thought he was talking about regular 4k 24/30 and not 4k60

[@awfulart7312]

People be like: damn i shit loads of megapixels to post on instagram

[@androsspear7647]

Instagram compression: I'm boutta end this man's whole career

[@sarwansabah]

​@@androsspear7647 😂😂😂

[@Dariusproductions]

Facts😢 ​@@androsspear7647

[@StefanoLombardoYT]

The A7IV has 7K oversampling so the 4k is extremely sharp!

[@saswatsarangi6669]

So why does he say it crops

[@StefanoLombardoYT]

@@saswatsarangi6669 the only time it crops is in 4k60

[@Artechzest]

for wedding shoots ....40k 60p is must because 60p can be slowed upto 1/4 using optical flow in premier.

[@blopp6240]

​@@Artechzest crop doesnt put unusable stamp on it

[@ScottThePisces]

@@StefanoLombardoYT also, that crop is still producing a 4k resolution image. It's cropping into the 7k image.

[@georgantonischki1188]

i had the sony and returned it for the canon. I do almost only photography. The canon is easier to use for most topics. Very annoying on the Sony, if you want to use your iPhone for GPS, you can't close the back screen. If the camera is switched off, or does it by itself the connection needs to be redone with opening the Sony App on the phone. IBIS and dark scenes are way better on the Canon as is anything green. I wanted the Sony, as you can get autofocus for vintage lenses on it. This isn't offered for Canon. But the 58mm 1.4 from Minolta (and thus related to the Sony) looks much more natural on the Canon. Here it is really a dream lens.

[@Kill3dge]

My pick is Lumix s5, dual native iso, low light beast, v-log with amazing dynamic range, external prores raw, and is much cheaper than r6 or a7iv, the only drawback is video af, but the price and capabilities are amazing.

[@77dris]

There is always a "drawback"

[@JeanV1986]

It depends on what you need. I love Panasonic cameras, but I shoot moving subjects and the Sony is in another league.

[@naseeb46]

Amazing dynamic range is up for debate. A7iv has much more dynamic range compared to the S5. A7iv also have dual native iso. It doesn't have prores recording. But the af is amazing, S5 can't even come close. Don't get me wrong, I love the S5, but A7iv and the R6 justifies it's price with other stuff. Still mad at canon for stopping 3rd party support though.

[@junny908]

​@@naseeb46 not much more ofc, check cined. It has slight a bit more dd than s5ii or s5. Moreover s5 even has more latitude than a74

[@razafiarisonmichael4421]

​@@naseeb46s5 ii

[@williebravousa]

I love my R6ii, I use all my EF glasses (third party) with the amazing adapter without any problem.

[@draledralezzz]

What adapter do u have?

[@kylebaine2901]

I second that question, although its probably just the regular canon adapter​@draledralezzz

[@AustinWestbro]

I got so lucky. I bought an R6 as my first camera and they announce the R6Mk2 in the month long return window.

[@santanuchanda]

What does a month-long return window mean?

[@kuanishere]

@@santanuchanda it means he can return his less-than-a-month R6 back to the camera shop so he can switch to R6ii

[@AustinWestbro]

@@santanuchanda when you buy new from B&H they let you return it any time within a month and get all your money back

[@JeahnLaffitte]

honestly anything above 24mp is overkill even for major commercial projects today. So I wouldn’t sweat it either way ❤

[@mertinanc]

Depends if you are cropping your shots.

[@JeahnLaffitte]

@@mertinanc very true

[@TheChadWork2001]

I’d get the Canon R6 2 over the Sony A7R4. There’s just something about Canon.

[@sahilsvision]

A7iv Over sampling and the autofocus 👌

[@willoughbykrenzteinburg]

The megapixel war was over a while ago. Unless youre blowing up your shots to poster size or you do a lot of heavy cropping, 24 MP is plenty. Once you pass a certain threshold - and both cameras have passed it - it becomes a balance between density and individual pixel size. The larger each individual pixel, the better light gathering capabilities they have - thus less noise. Generally speaking.

[@markshirley01]

Gyro stabalisation is a big feature - I use it all the time

[@knowwork9]

Sony?

[@prithvirajraorane6645]

Instead of talking about specs, we should improve our photography skills, creative aspects and so on.

[@EneRec]

I just bought a beaten up a6300, yeah. Exactly what I needed to worry about!

[@ArcDitech]

Me having no money but still watching 🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧

[@SchardtCinematic]

I have the Canon R7. While it may be a crop frame mirrorless my video is very detailed and fine and also is 32.5 megapixels and despite all of that. It's not to bad in low light. Plus I Can use so many lens types on it.

[@AnthonyGugliotta]

I'm hoping Canon releases an R7c like they did the R5c. I think it would compete really well with the Sony FX30 and Black Magic Pocket Cams for Videographers! :)

[@SchardtCinematic]

@@AnthonyGugliotta Yes that would be great. I didn't even know what the R5c was till two days ago. Pretty cool they made an R5 geared just toward filmmaking. Yet still can do 45mp stills. A cropped frame R7 geared toward filmmaking would be great too . Maybe they could up the video to 6K on it.

[@hy7968]

The r7 is a pretty challenging sensor for most lenses and is pretty limited by the effects of diffraction.

[@brodie.p]

I went with the R6 ii instead of the A7iv and a big part of my decision was I didn't like how the Sony felt to hold.

[@mezza001]

I would go with the Canon R6 Mk II for the videography….

[@jeffrey322]

Love my R6 Mark II!

[@rizkyfadhila3875]

I assume, this video doesn't matter to a lot of photographer. Because someone who's going to buy either one of these cameras at this price point already has a camera and know what they want, and that makes a huge difference because their previous system would make a huge impact on what they choose in the end. If they don't want to sell out all their previous lens, I think it doesn't not really matter which one of these cameras is better, as long as it is better than their previous camera

[@syksystransitagency]

I think both are great, and I definately thought about both brands. However, the R6II felt better in my hands which, in the end, was the desiding factor.

[@pumpkytalks7909]

Lower Megapixel is better for video and high dynamic range ... And better low light performer. But higher magapixle makes a video+ photo camera.

[@larrycoonrod5563]

My Canon EF glass works just fine on the R6ii with the adapter so glass selection isn’t really an issue

[@sonalikulkarni1326]

Pls tell me which one is better for events & videography.. & which lenses are cheaper?? Canon or Sony??

[@__Tate__]

R6 is photography cameras. If you want videography, then you sellect sony. Sony's lenses is cheaper than canon too.

[@sonalikulkarni1326]

@@__Tate__ thank u so much.

[@JAMESART.]

The way I see it, one camera is meant for those who like to create videos, and the other, for those who like to take photos. The tool to use is determined by the task at hand.

[@kast404]

I prefer sony over canon. But ive only ever used an old canon. I didnt like the menu system so i made my decision based off that Fuji and sony for me :) Plus i prefer the colours on Sony and Fuji

[@marinrealestatephotography]

I shoot Panasonic, so I don't have a dog in the fight. Yes, i am envious of the full frame coverage of the R6 II, but even in full frame, the sensor on the R6 II has less dynamic range than the a7 IV has when shooting in aps-c crop mode (and less than my Panasonic S1 and S5 cameras, too). Gerald Undone speculates that it is only a 12-bit readout (instead of 14-bit) which results in faster readout (and less rolling shutter) at the expensie of dynamic range, and the ability to recover data from dark shadows with noise reduction in post. But hey, if yoiu own a R6 MK II, keep rocking on with it!!! There is no perfect camera (my Panasonic bodies are certainly far from perfect).

[@Kazoom28]

Depends whether you are a photographer or videographer first

[@FelixHuray]

The canon lens prices are crazyyyyyy

[@whosjozikolnik]

that's exactly why I switched to Sony

[@naseeb46]

@@whosjozikolnik Great choice. I was gonna buy the canon r6, the lens debacle made me look more into others and now I'm with sony a7iv.

[@whosjozikolnik]

@@naseeb46 are you happy with it? I love the focus breathing compensation, wish my A7R4 had that haha

[@naseeb46]

@@whosjozikolnik I don't have any experience with the a7r4 apart from watching reviews. I'm quite happy with the a7iv. Focus breathing compensation certainly is helpful for any kind of professional video production, but it mostly just works with some first party lenses. I don't really mind the 1.5x crop for 4k60p. Also, because of the 33mp sensor, using super35 mode is actually not bad. The rolling shutter seems to be better in the super35 mode as well.

[@whosjozikolnik]

@@naseeb46 oh yea I love the super35 mode and chose the A7R4 specifically because it has 26mp in crop mode which is still plenty useable. how many megapixels do you get out of your camera?

[@bonOhm]

One of the biggest letdown is that the Canon R6 II only shoots in IPB compressed (no ALL-I). The Sony a7 IV can shoot in both.So for that alone, I would pick the Sony.

[@kylebaine2901]

Could you explain some of the drawbacks of this? Genuinely curious

[@william-f-n]

The Sony A7iv is oversampling from 7k in 4k 24, 25 and 30. The 4k 60 is actually oversampled from 4,6k. And we all now that 7k is better than 6k. Sony is always best😀(Sometimes)

[@77dris]

Guess what you are wrong. Oversampling diminishes. The R5 is oversampling from 8K in 4K so it should blowowowow away the A7IV. But nope, the IQ is about the same as the R6 4k. But how about the fact that Sony can't do 4K 60 without a crop? I mean what is this? 2014?

[@william-f-n]

@@77dris I have the a7iv and i dont care about the crop (Sometime i wish i had it in fullframe😡) The R5 and R5c is also some pretty overkill cameras with 12bit internal and cost much more than i can afford.

[@mohamedadnan7310]

I think 24 megapixels is quite enough for a photographer And the proof is that the previous version of Sony was 24 and was loved by all photographersIf you like megapixels, go to A7R , The rest of the specifications are completely superior to Canon

[@SchardtCinematic]

I remember back in 2012 when I bought my first DSLR. I bought a Canon T3i it had 18 Megapixels and I was blown away by that back then. Making the image actual size and seeing stuff in the photos I didn't even know I got was amazing. Now I have the 90D and an R7. Both are 32.5MP and both shoot 4K. So now I get even more detail.

[@hy7968]

I mean the differences in resolution are really hard to identify unless you like to pixel peep or do really large prints.

[@SchardtCinematic]

@@hy7968 I like high megapixels for seeing objects off in the distance you normally don't see or notice. I always thought it cool zooming in and seeing a house kind if hidden in the trees and etc. Us my vision isn't the greatest right now and my camera have become a visual aid device for me as well.

[@Primeros1000]

Who has better native glass? More affordable, bigger selection? Its not just about the body

[@richiem8217]

Don’t forget you can only buy canon lenses on the r6 mark ii. On the Sony you can buy third party lenses. To me the better camera or better buy seems to be Sony

[@Lev782]

I use a Sigma 35mm 1.4 ART lens with an adapter on my R6mkii. Focuses and runs just fine

[@jasonswartzbaugh3925]

All about the lens line up. I have the R6 and wish I had gone with the Sony

[@HectorRiveraPhotography]

canon better color science i’m a don’t shooter im about to ho back to canon

[@MiTechTalk]

What are you talking? Canon oversampling from 6k full frame readout whereas Sony oversampling from 5k APSC readout so Sony is sharper. I observed it personally.

[@ayaanbari6711]

The only problem with nowadays canon is that the lens scene is too dull ,i mean you will have to buy glass with double the price of sony(as it supports third party makers). Dont get me wrong,i have primarily worked with canon but the price makes overall advantage of canon looks dull. I am more into photography and the color science of canon is much better and appealing to me but again that price lf glass made me think twice before buying a r6 mk2 and thinking of getting a a7iv

[@gelluny]

S5ii of course

[@joesjourney145]

I own the Sony A7IV and the crop is annoying but when in 4k 25 it does downsample from 7k to 4k so it looks super sharp, just like the Canon R6 mark2

[@jasper2771]

Have fun finding lenses for that cannon lol

[@bluebellcrushedvelvet]

Errmmm have you heard of sigma?? 🤣🤣☠☠ clearly not! You can buy plenty for cannon and they actually have the best and most varied selection of lenses! Super easy to find an 3rd company lenses for Canon!! ☠☠

[@jarnix2]

​@@bluebellcrushedvelvet not for the r mount

[@jimiboi87]

@@jarnix2 adapter much?

[@jimiboi87]

@@futoenjoyer Good to know. I've been considering whether to upgrade from my M50 to either the Canon R6 MKII, or the Sony A7IV, and affordable quality lens selection is a factor. Using my EF-M to EF-S adapter, I have had amazing results with the Sigma f1.8 18-35. The autofocus and overall compatibility seems just as good as with the actual Canon glass.

[@mrmonday42]

I think the Canon is the better body and I would be tempted to switch, but my two favorite lenses are my 35mm f1.4 and 20mm f1.8, neither of which are available on the Canon

[@niknice5982]

Im a Canon guy but I have to say that most canos look quite bulky for me like the more slim design of the Sonnys more

[@Paintbait]

Obviously in that price range, if you're sitting in a bunch of Canon gear stick with the canon and feel good about it. I reckon one of the other Sony models that's more geared for video is probably going be a better choice if you're sitting in some Sony gear. If you primarily shoot stills I would probably lean Sony or upgrade into A7R or A9 models which seem like they're more specifically geared for video (and also more expensive hence the comparison isn't relevant obviously)

[@zwiemon]

Sony has the A7 as an allrounder A7C for low light and video And the A7R for high resolution

[@ryanvoll7088]

If I was to upgrade from my Canon 7D Mk II to a mirrorless (ideally staying with Canon to reuse lenses), which would you recommend?

[@cristopherchaves3940]

Also, less pixels at this level also means better capturing of light in low light situations

[@CFLDumpsters]

R6 mk ii with the RF L glass is 🔥 I love mine, sent the Sony back, comparing the two side by side the canon af was faster. L glass is hard to beat. Sony has the smaller factor which is nice, but I don’t regret keeping the R 6 mk ii. I shoot mostly stills. The menus in Sony are convoluted and confusing. Both are great cameras. But canon has exceed Sony in a lot of ways, finally.

[@johannvantassel4604]

a7iv has better low light/ISO, sharpness, IBIS, oversample 4k, and the R6ii has better AF, and burst shooting. I own 3 sony lenses so I bought the a7iv but I imagine buying the r6ii as a canon shooter would be a great choice too.

[@cancansem]

which one is better for portrait canon 6d mark 2 or r8 ?

[@JaketheMotorhead]

A7iv has oversampled video too?? Also the crop isn't a big deal, because 60fps is for mainly slow-mo, where you need to get close. R6II has more expensive lenses, lower resolution, and not a full size HDMI. Sorry, I think you are mistaken.

[@tricknee253]

Went Sony because I already owned a lot of Sony lenses. Love the camera.

[@Mathew-vlogs]

I do think the canon r6ii is better then the Sony a7iv. But when purchasing a camera you must also consider the lens options that are available for each camera. And that’s where Sony takes the win. Especially because of 3rd party support. Once you buy a few lenses, the price can be dramatically different. Most likely Sony being the less expensive. And before someone says I’m only gonna use first party lenses, let me just say, you can do whatever you want. But if you have that kind of cash to spend. Either pick up the Sony a1 or the canon r3. Just saying.

[@olafhackenberg6192]

First we speak about two photocameras and second about video, so I see Sony in front, because it‘s the better photocam, the autofocus is the best in market you can buy.

[@zafarhashmi929]

Man I love Ur vids

[@-orange5975]

The 1st I saw the title I know you are going to choose Canon since you are a brand ambassador.

[@silentnook4371]

Considering prices on RF mount native lenses - Sony is a much better option, if you don't want to pay more for the same quality

[@iikzii]

Meanwhile there are people who shoot insane cinematic short films with the Panasonic GH5 with a micro 4/3 sensor. It doesn't matter. Sony A7siii/FX3 have a 12mp sensor as well. Get what you want. See what features peak your interest the most.

[@garretreed9709]

Also, canon doesn’t support third-party lenses while Sony still does. So is Canon even better not really

[@Zen9Media]

What about overheating on R6 mark II, bro?

[@dan_e-m7891]

a7m4 overheats in 4k60 even faster

[@kyawzarnioo5350]

Lets talk about third party lens also😮

[@JoeVazquezProductorMusical]

Hey Canon lover. Here I want to leave a grain of sand for you. High megapixels do not determine which camera will have better resolution and sharp image quality. It is proven that 12 megapixels is more than enough to have premium quality in both photography and filming. What determines the quality is the one behind the camera and the sensor of that camera, it is the one that records or shoots well-focused photos that will make it look well done. That's why Sony crushes Canon by a thousand miles, you can't compare a Sony RAW 16-bit full frame sensor that has a superior advantage over a Canon that is still in 35mm 12-bit sensor that is the same "APS-C" in Sony, for example: a Sony A7IV with its 33mp, full frame sensor, plus the high-end computing, plus the color science it has makes your Canon look like a baby. In my years of career I have not seen professionals use Canon to make serious movies, they always use Arri, Red or Sony. That's why you see a Sony fx6, Venice or Burano with 12 megapixels that make the images look more stunning. Canon is a very good brand but everything looks very flat and to make a photo look good you have to alter it in lightroom with a lot contrast, saturation, +4 sharpness and even then the photos don't look as good as on a Sony. I go further, the Atomos company has wanted to take Canon into filming, giving it the privilege of having access to being able to record 8k with a Canon R5 and several pros have done tests with a Sony fx3 in 4k DCI vs with R5 and they determine that the FX3 does It does a better job than the Canon when they lower the resolution from 8K to 4K because the industry is not ready for 8K yet. So this 8k thing is marketing to sell, so don't believe everything you hear and see, better do tests and I assure you that at some point in your life I will see you switching to Sony. Cheers

[@ReedWanadiOfficial]

don't forget to tell that shooting 4K 60 in A7IV is also overheating so fast and R6II easily beat that

[@someguy3987]

ILY Anthony

[@Abeljessy]

What colour filter did u use for this video?

[@JesusChristSaves.]

Anthony - Gobble Gobble Gobble Gobble... Sony - What are you doing with that Canon in there? Anthony - I TOLD YOU DON'T DISTURB ME WHILE IM CLEANING MY ROOM!

[@ibraheemsony9947]

Sony my dear, canon lenses are expensive, also less maga pixels make the sensor better for video anyway. If you are a a beginner photographer , please buy an old crop sensor with a prime lens. It doesn’t matter if you didn’t get a good photo composition , if your light source is bad , you take a bad angle. Just be a good photographer then think about camera specs.

[@adnan_velic]

Get a xh2s. Way better video camera than both of those cameras. Disregard the full frame BS hype. ARRI makes cinema cameras and use s35 sensors. If full frame was so superior ARRI would mainly make full frame cinema cameras.

[@Burritosarebetterthantacos]

Fuji…thats cute.

[@Artechzest]

True ....to me this is a big deal.... only 30p in 4k with a7iv was a big thumbs down for me...

[@andybelii]

Sony a7rv or canon r6 ii?

[@elubaloop]

Whatever U think Sony a7iv is better than cannon I am using it for straight 2 months and my clients are impressed by it ,so

[@mitsos88spyr]

Sony is also downscaled and also it has a TON of third party lenses ... Tamron , sigma etc and they are cheaper than canons system ...

[@vidunthewsara1457]

What’s your idea about Nikon z5

[@itsJulian23]

Biggest draw for the R6ii for me is the 40 pics/s burst vs only 10 (or 11?) on the a7iv

[@PatrickAlcorta]

MP count means next to nothing bc an IPhone 13 Pro Max with 12MP was taking better photos than the Galaxy S22 Ultra which had I believe a 200MP sensor. Same thing for the iPhone 15 Pro Max: 48MP sensor takes better photos than the Galaxy S23 Ultra. (I’m not entirely sure if the S24 Ultra is out yet so that’s why it’s not mentioned)

[@greygoose3936]

Canon has been making some great bodies recently but their limited lens selection and refusal to allow 3rd party support is what drove me to go to Sony.

[@sushruta9743]

Killed it

[@Alsuhaim]

But, what about video codecs?

[@seageo4303]

What does the end user benefit most from? Can mobile device users tell the difference from an image or video quality perspective?

[@MVREMD1]

I’d sacrifice for the better low light performance. With a lot of gigs shooting content only, lighting is less than ideal and a lot of clients budgets don’t allot for lighting

[@XDATT]

Why not mention the oversampling of 7k in the Sony a7iv hmmm

[@kayanna418]

is the r6ii a better buy than the r7? if so in what ways?

[@XDarkmage1]

they are very different cameras, R7 is APS-C and R6 is fullframe. It changes everything

[@mathiaspfuetzner]

It's also better for sports, cause it's a lot faster (40 images per second VS 11 images per second)

[@viaggiindue]

I want to take photos. videographers need to buy the fx6 and get out of the way

[@VnDuzen]

The r6 ii is close to 3k here in the uk. Its oversampling does not come close and all the glass is too expensive. Nice build though

[@KdubLA]

There is so many upsides and downsides to both. The Sony does have a crop but also has significantly better dynamic range. Sony also has a vast amount of lenses to choose from. However the Sony has very inconsistent AF and very documented issues with that. Where as the Canon R6ii has Almost perfect AF, better Screen, better handling, more FPS and no crop yet has a very Minimal options of lenses and HORRENDOUS wobbles while shooting video with wide lenses… So you kinda got to pick your poison.

[@Thundr4x]

Ever since Canon always releases slight lower megapixels but has usable features.

[@djyazar7768]

Why no one talking about Canon EOS R with Sony lenses ? I am very interested above that ❤️❤️i hope you will see this comment 🙀🙀

[@raph.cinema]

Sony should have made the A7IV a 24MP camera and done 4K60 no crop and better sensor readout times

[@NiththikaSri]

Canon r6 mark ii is japan manufacturing is good ?

[@DriftLibrary]

Personally, canon is my tool of choice. I don’t know what world Sony is living in, their colours are wacky. Colour correcting Canon footage is much more pleasant to work with and manipulate.

[@razafiarisonmichael4421]

If you use Sony you'll notice it has more room for editing, but if you prefer the look straight out of the camera, canon is a good choice

[@thegoldenmaestro]

Yeh but they ditched the clean HDMI output which is a massive deal breaker for me coz I need that live stream for my weddings

[@lostwithdyl]

I own an A7iv and it’s an absolute beast

[@knowwork9]

How is it bro im thinking to get one but they said it has overheat is this for real? Whats the disappointment in it? I see it like a beast actually

[@lostwithdyl]

@@knowwork9 no overheating issues with this one bro…. And I’ve used it in summer in South Africa, as well as outside in broad daylight in New Zealand. Works perfectly. No disapoingments

[@knowwork9]

@@lostwithdyl i couldn't see any disappointments in this beast just the shutterline mybe and its not as a problem

[@ajeesh3485]

Is megapixel really matters?

[@alostcat]

You should Get The Blackmagic 6k pro pocket edition

[@Thai.H]

A74 is also over sampled at 4k

[@TheNorang]

The biggest deal breaker for Sony a7iv is the warpy rolling shutter.

[@hannaortega9154]

The rolling shutter is actually better on the A7IV in APS-C mode when compared to the FX30's rolling shutter. I know he's comparing Canon's R6 to the Sony in this video, but I thought it'd be relevant nonetheless.

[@thinksolve2880]

Wats the bit rate ?

[@neel7photography]

What about overheating?