ARABIC DISCOVERY: The Origin of ALL languages | Arabic101

[@PriceIsNeverRight]

"Amir Al Bahr" , became "Amiral" in French and " Admiral" In English

[@Coldyraps]

This is an example of loan words

[@MohammadAslamMagsi]

In Sindhi an Indian language we call it mir bahar

[@mirtalpur739]

@@MohammadAslamMagsiin Sindhi it’s also Amir Al bahr but after Baluch conquest it became Mir Al bahr

[@MohammadAslamMagsi]

@@mirtalpur739 bro our elders narrate stories. They call it mir bahar. Wallah Allam

[@MalachiCo0]

Half correct, it just comes from Amir

[@vasme-ju1hk]

My dear brother, i hold your tajweed, quran, and arabic grammer in the highest of esteem. If i doubt a certaon pronounciation in quran, i refer to you since it is clear to me that you have mastered this science beautifully and are very trustworthy and knowledgable in this matter. Having said that, it is a known fact that both anglo saxon and latin as well as french, russian, persian, pashto, hindi, bengali and thousands of others are indo european languages originating north of the black sea and central asia, whereas arabic, hebrew, somali, hausa, amazigh, and all these are afro asiatic, altogether unrelated to indo european, uralic, bantu, turkic, and other language families. Arabic is the most beautiful language in my opinion, since it is the language of the quran, and the prophes sallallahu alayhi wasallam and the three favored gereations radillah anhum, and no other can match its depth, eloquence, and beaty but that does not mean it is the oldest. Please, be either more thorough or truthfull, whichever is lacking in this video. Understand we value your content specifically because it is great quality, close detail, authentic, and you are knowledgable in this, so when you make these kinds of rediculous claims, it does not benefit either you nor us, so that disbelievers do not think of us as fools. Please kerp making the good videos you are used to making and we are used to seeing. Salam

[@MShreefUK]

He means before afroasiatic & indoeuropean. It's about the origin of all languages. Certainly language started as one then divides, whatever that one was. I'm not saying the theory is right, but it has strong evidence. In all cases it doesn't change actions or creeds.

[@Muslim-z7i]

Check how you typed when saying may ALLĀH be pleased with him if you did

[@vasme-ju1hk]

@@Muslim-z7ijazakallah kharan akhi, but there is no need to capitalize anything, this was neither made fard upon the believers nor is it a sunnah of the prophet sallallahu alayhi wasallam

[@treelight1707]

I am not sure why you called it ridiculous. He did provide sources, and an argument. The conclusion is up to you.

[@Bayezid_Bostami]

@@treelight1707 The thing is, this video doesn't show the full picture. It revolves only around the latin and the germanic languages. However, There are entirely different families of languages. Take Chinese, Japanese and Korean, for example. Also, there are languages like bengali, turkish, etc. If the video showed the full picture, there might be even more proofs of the claim, or against it. But whatever it is, we expect a more thorough video from this channel, as we hold it so close to our heart.

[@saltoscuanticos]

As a muslim linguist I have to say tha this is completely absurd

[@HamzaDestinyKassim]

Explain better please??

[@alihasanabdullah7586]

@@HamzaDestinyKassim He needs to explain better how Arabic is in any way shape or form related to, say Chinese, Aztec or Sanskrit. And especially what's the proof. This is all patently untrue, and goes against the 'Ijma' of experts in the field.

[@marvelousmarvelxx3889]

​@@alihasanabdullah7586 If you dont know how arabic came in touch with aztech, chinese or sanskrit, you have no qualification to explain what the ijma of experts in this field is. Stop trying to act smart, you are just another uneducated rando

[@katiecat9353]

The video makes no sense to anyone with even a basic understanding of linguistics

[@ThePreparedMuslim]

I'm sorry your degree didn't teach you how to think, because the video is very easy to understand. Sadly sometimes PHDs cripple the mind.

[@MixtureGuy]

This video has inaccuracies. أرجو (I request, I hope) does not mean "rego" (to rule, to guide) كنس (to hide/to retreat/to sweep) does not mean "cinis" (ashes, embers, ruin, destruction) نقص (to decrease) does not mean "necesse" (necessary, needed) Anglo-Saxon ورى (creation, to kindle) does not mean "wara" (an inhabitant, to care, to guard) هون (easy) does not mean "hwon" (a few, a little) ورد (watering hole) does not mean "wyrt" (plant, vegetable, herb) English صنح (cymbal, harp) does not mean "song" هب (thinking, to move suddenly) does not mean "hop" رج (to shake) does not mean "rock" ... 75% of Latin verb roots and 80% of Anglo-Saxon verbs does not have Arabic origins. Latin and Anglo-Saxon have distinct roots in the Indo-European family, while Arabic belongs to the Afroasiatic family. Arabic has influenced European languages through trade and cultural exchanges, but not to this extent. The word "سكر" (sugar), cited as an example in the video, originates from Middle Persian (𐭱𐭪𐭥), which, in turn, derives from the Sanskrit word "शर्करा." Like all languages, Arabic has borrowed words from other languages, a process that is a natural part of linguistic evolution. Arabic isn't unique in this regard, as linguistic exchange is a universal phenomenon. The claim that words stem from Arabic instead of Latin due to the greater number of Arabic roots is logically flawed. A language having more roots doesn't imply that specific words in another language originated from it. Language development is complex, involving various influences that cannot be explained by sheer volume alone; historical interactions, trade, and cultural exchanges play a crucial role. As Muslims, we need to move beyond the idea of Arabic or Arab superiority. Arabic is a language like any other, not inherently more divine. If Allah willed, the Quran could have been revealed in any language, just as easily. To claim that Arabic was uniquely necessary for this purpose undermines Allah's boundless power.

[@Omroqurba]

You must be the funniest in a party, what you here said IS ALSO A THEORY. I don't know if you understand how etymology works and that everything is based mainly on suppositions because we don't have text that goes back to pre-history. He literally just showed another theory with its proofs, just say that you are an Arab hater.

[@MixtureGuy]

@@Omroqurba Please let me know how I am an "Arab hater" for saying Arabs aren't superior to other Muslims and if the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ) was also an "Arab hater" for saying, "Verily there is no superiority of an Arab over a non-Arab or of a non-Arab over an Arab..." Ahmad (22978).

[@Omroqurba]

@@MixtureGuy WE ARE SPEAKING ABOUT ARABIC, THE LANGUAGE. AND YOU ARE ACTUALLY HATING ON ARABS, WE SEE HOW THE WEST BRAINWASHED YOU

[@DinoBryce]

​@@MixtureGuyWhat you say is true! In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects.

[@ahmedharajli189]

@@Omroqurbaokay first of all just because he said it’s a theory does not absolve him from critiques of this theory, and that does not allow him to blatantly lie about things in order to support it

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

"Tall" didn't mean tall until about 500 years ago. Its similarity to an Arabic word is probably coincidental. Though one can speculate whether the change in meaning was influenced by Arabic. "The sense of "being of more than average height (and slim in proportion to height)" probably evolved out of earlier meanings "brave, valiant, seemly, proper" (c. 1400), "attractive, handsome" (late 14c.), also "large, big" (mid-14c.), as sometimes in Modern English, colloquially. The sense evolution is "remarkable," says OED (1989), but it notes that adjectives applied to persons can wander far in meaning (such as pretty, buxom, German klein "small, little," which in Middle High German meant the same as its English cognate clean (adj.))." Etymonline

[@NeoYas]

Altus (height) is a latin word, from arabic Al-tul الطول, which gave us alto in spanish. In sanscrit we have uttAla with the same meaning, at-tula. الطول.

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

@@NeoYas Pronounced At-tul because ط is a sun letter.

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

@@NeoYas "Latin word altus comes from Proto-Indo-European *h₂el-, and later Proto-Indo-European *h₂életi (To be nourishing.)" Cooljugator

[@NeoYas]

@@anderslvolljohansen1556 Yes I know, that's the official hypothesis.

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

@@NeoYas What makes you believe Altus came from Arabic?

[@devinstewart2973]

Brother, with all due respect, this video is misleading. You can believe that Arabic is a wonderful language, and acknowledge the ways in which it has heavily contributed to the vocabularies of many languages, while still being scientific about this. Firstly, every language changes. Every single one. Arabic included. Arabic as it was 1400 years ago itself was the product of millenia of changes, as is every other language. Contribution of loaned vocabulary words IS NOT the same as being the "source language" of another tongue. That's why the Persian language, for all its Arabic loans, is incomprehensible to an Arab who doesnt speak Persian. Language is more than vocabulary. It's a system that is made up of syntax rules, morphology/grammar, and phonology. Vocabulary is one portion of the system. Also, this completely goes out of the window when you compare Arabic to any Sinitic language, any Andean language - basically, anywhere not in contact with Muslims or Romans.

[@stevesmith4901]

The internet is filled with this sort of pseudoscience. The guy cites one obscure book by an unknown author. These people do a disservice to Arabic by making such outlandish claims. Stick to tajweed I say. Don't try to branch out into the science of linguistics if you know nothing about it.

[@gloryjudgement7563]

11:04 although I agree it is a bit misleading, he also says it's just a theory, so he recognizes that this is not 100% true. Rather, I would say he is just trying to share the amazing similarities of Arabic in other languages

[@GiraffesDontExist]

@@gloryjudgement7563 No, he's lying.

[@mohammadawyan5236]

@@GiraffesDontExist What is he lying about? I don't think Arabic is the Origin but I do know that it is older than claimed and even before it was Arabic it was something else with the same roots. Syriac, Semetic, Aramiac, Egyptian....etc. Same language, same culture.

[@GiraffesDontExist]

@@mohammadawyan5236 So, that's not true either. But you yourself are saying the video is lying, so I don't know what explanation you want...

[@SomeofThisSomeofThat]

Whoa the Arab superiority complex is strong. With all due respect, it’s dumb to suggest Adam spoke Arabic. There are languages that have written records that are older than Arabic - Akkadian, Sumerian, Egyptian and those are only the WRITTEN languages. Arabic is one of many AFRO-Semitic languages. Emphasis on AFRO…AFRICAN. The first languages were spoken not written. There are African civilizations that exist today who have been speaking their languages before Arabic was thought of. Stop the lies and propaganda.

[@servantofthemerciful3511]

This video is misleading. I am a Muslim. Islam doesn't support Arab supremacy. He probably brainwashed by some affiliated ignorant. But besides this I want to ask you what do you think about the language of Ad Samud who were Arabs before Ismail Alaihisalam? What do think about their language how old that would be ?

[@ljomanl]

Furthermore, it is known there are only 4 Arab prophets. If the first language was Arabic, wouldn’t Adam (as) be considered an Arab prophet?

[@amanpalestina9664]

Nope. This video does not suggest that Adam speaks Arabic. Arabic only came from Mesopotamia~Aramaic~Hebrew Koine. Timeline Arab came from Ishmael, from Abraham, ANYWAY.

[@abel5467]

@@amanpalestina9664 Arabic came from the prophet Ismail? You really think he began his own language, he lived among the local peoples there married among them and adopted their language. Likely spoke some form of proto-Arabic

[@amanpalestina9664]

@@abel5467 Nope. What I wrote was Arab came from the Prophet Ishmael. I may correct myself THOSE Arab that carries the Ishmael DNA. You have to correct yourself too ; that ARABIC was NOT invented or came from Ishmael. Before that, before he can speak, he can only utter baa baa, chaa chaa, ga ga, glug, glug. What I imply is that Arab speaks Arabic. Problem with that ? Or they speak Javanese, or Japanese or Hokkien or Malay.

[@inamplanet7796]

İn Azerbaijan language (azerbaijanian turkish) 60 % may be even more are Arabic . There for it is easy to remember new words for us . Elhamdullilah

[@ramiz313]

Niyə yalan danışırsan axı hardan altmış faiz oldu? Özünüzdən rəqəm uydurmağı elə sevirsiz ki

[@inamplanet7796]

@@ramiz313 ailə, zəif, səadət, müəllim, sual, maaş, bədii, mətbəə, aləm, məna, elan, xüsusi, səliqə, rəng, rəsm, rəssam, rəf, məktub, vəfa, ticarət, sirr, həll, hiss, xətt, tibb, hədd, nəsr − nasir − mənsur; şəkil − təşkil − mütəşəkkil; eşq − aşiq − məşuq − məşuqə, məktəb, məktub, kitab, katib, dərs, tədris, mədrəsə, sinif, elm, Allah, rəbb, islam, peyğəmbər, məscid, müsəlman, inam, səcdə, ilahi, həcc, axirət, cənnət, şeytan və ilaxır... adlardanƏkbər, Zəhra, Ömər, Cəfər, Həsən, Əli, Fatma,..........

[@inamplanet7796]

@@ramiz313 dilçilik elminilə maraqlanın. Burda yazdıqlarım sözləri hər gün istifadə olunanlardı. Ərəb mənşəlidir. Və burda heç bir qəbahət yoxdu. Sözlər daha çox var. Maraqlıdırsa elminkitablara nəzər salın və ya özünüz elmə üz tutun. Salamat!

[@ramiz313]

@@inamplanet7796 mən demədim e ərəb dilinə məxsus sözlər az işlənir Azərbaycan dilində mən dedim ki 60 faizi hardan aldın Hansi kitabda yazılıb axı o faiz?

[@jamalbenhamou]

this just means Arabic influenced your language. Imagine that my language(Tamazight) was being banned until recently in favor of Arabic.

[@frankeinstein719]

You are talking specifically about the connection between Arabic and European languages. A lot of Asian, African, Aboriginal and Native American languages have nothing to do with Arabic.

[@egs3470]

Yep. Just look at the languages that never had contact with Arabic and the Middle East and you’ll see how baseless his claims are. I’d love to see him try to show how Chinese or Korean words come from Arabic roots - there just isn’t any relation at all

[@user-yn1ur5us8r]

I am Somali and I assure you that many Somali terms are derived from Arabic, and some terms have disappeared and the Arabic term remained, such as “time” which is “waqti” = وقت.

[@LyingOstrich]

Thank you.

[@frankeinstein719]

@@user-yn1ur5us8r of course, because Somali people had lots of interactions with Arabs. But I’m not talking about you.

[@egs3470]

@@user-yn1ur5us8r Somali is related to Arabic, but thousands (yes, literally thousands) of other African languages have no relation to Arabic at all

[@Mehmet_Fateh]

This video seems to completely neglect the development of the English language. For example, look up the etymology of the word "tall" - late Middle English: probably from Old English getæl ‘swift, prompt’. Early senses also included ‘fine, handsome’ and ‘bold, strong, good at fighting’. It's very unscientific to take the modern definition of a word and compare it to classical Arabic whilst ignoring the history of the word and how it has evolved and the meaning has changed. The methodolgy is all over the place. You accept the modern meaning of "tall", but you go have to old German for "Harbour". And even this denies that the habour is traced back to two words harjaz, meaning army, and bergo, meaning protection. I can't find a reference for "hunan Berg" This is the definition of cherry picking. Not to mention that Classical Arabic itself has its own history, with other semitic languages like Hebrew and Akkadian having a far earlier attestation. Any meaningful analysis would have to take place at the level of the proto languages. Just because things are similar that doesn't mean they are related. Sorry to say, but this video flies in the face of literally everything we know about linguistics. Allah knows best.

[@victoremman4639]

Nop. You just show you believe the western etymologists whom invented the PIE. I made etymologic investigation, and many proves that linguists of the 19th century made speculations without root. One thing important to keep in mind : the words are borrowed, so we don't know when "Tall" came in english, it could be in the 14th century, when jews were expelled from Spain, and reached netherland and later on england. So my point here : the protosemitic langue is the source of the PIE. I wrote many articles for demonstrations, going deeper than this video. The word Earth is semitic : أرض. Try to deny :)

[@Mehmet_Fateh]

@@victoremman4639 The claim that a tiny immigrant population of Jews could have influenced the majority of farming peasants in Western Europe to start using the words "earth" or "tall", something that they would have used on a daily basis, is frankly, absurd, especially when you consider that the Sephardic Jews themselves didn't speak Hebrew as a daily language. But feel free to demonstrate, using textual evidence, the evolution of these words from Ladino into Dutch and or English. I'd be happy to read your article for a deeper conversation.

[@victoremman4639]

@@Mehmet_Fateh I show you again what is absurd in your reasoning : the Jews came from Spain, the country with more knowledge in these time, and knowing also the written, when your farming people were illettrated. I know the people like you, firm believers on feary tells PIE invented language, knowing so little about anthropology or nothing. Try to prove Earth is not semitic. Wait serious argument from you. You may see : my coms disappeared in yutub. Found ""The english and its semitic origin arabeclassique forum actif"", many demonstrations. I just had try to explain further Earth and its origin, so again : أرض compound by etyma Rdz = compression, so the Earth front the Skies. You have here an exegesis aswell. The prefixed Hamza means Causality, aswel First. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa. My hypothesis fit with history and geopgraphy, middel age in north west europa. Foolish to follow an invented PIE.

[@victoremman4639]

@@Mehmet_Fateh I add this : the word أرض carries the etyma RDz wich means Compression, so the Earth front the Skies. See, the semantic analysis joined Theology and exegesis, semitic one. The A prefixed to archaic root RDz means Causality, is an archetyp meaning aswell First : Ardz. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa . So my hypothesis fit with the historical datation of its use, geography too, middle age in north west europa, when jews spread within europa. Foolish to follow the track of the invented PIE.

[@victoremman3089]

@@Mehmet_Fateh Issue with yutb, again and again : @Mehmet_Fateh I show you again what is absurd in your reasoning : the Jews came from Spain, the country with more knowledge in these time, and knowing also the written, when your farming people were illettrated. I know the people like you, firm believers on feary tells PIE invented language, knowing so little about anthropology or nothing. Try to prove Earth is not semitic. Wait serious argument from you. You may see : my coms disappeared in yutub. Found ""The english and its semitic origin arabeclassique forum actif"", many demonstrations. I just had try to explain further Earth and its origin, so again : أرض compound by etyma Rdz = compression, so the Earth front the Skies. You have here an exegesis aswell. The prefixed Hamza means Causality, aswel First. Middle Dutch eerde, Dutch aarde, Old High German erda, German Erde, Gothic airþa. My hypothesis fit with history and geopgraphy, middel age in north west europa. Foolish to follow an invented PIE.

[@bob_bobbins]

First of all, it’s pretty obvious you have never studied linguistics. Indo-European languages, such as Greek, Sanskrit, Russian, English and even Bulgarian come from Proto-Indo-European, not Arabic because there has been done a lot of comperative linguistic research on the protolanguage. It is true, that languages can borrow terms and words from other languages, which was shown in your video. However, it seems that you have cherry picked examples for your video and did not go into semantic and pragmatic meaning of the words you discussed. Arabic comes from its own family, from which Hebrew, Coptic and other Semitic languages derive. What you did was basically to take words that ‘sound’ similar to Arabic and it is not a valid evidence for concluding that all languages come from Arabic. I would like to know about how Chinese, Greenlandic, languages of Africa, South American languages, languages of Oceania share, according to you, the common ancestor of Arabic. The same logic that you have used could be applied to make the claim that it is Hebrew, that is the protolanguage. So far, this video seems to me as poorly researched and heavily biassed.

[@livewithislam9818]

Welcome, I am very pleased and honored that this clip aroused your interest and passion and that you dedicated your valuable time to follow it. ______ First, we do not deny that European languages are derived from Proto-Indo-European. Second, Sanskrit is highly likely to be the mother of all Indo-European languages because it is very ancient and written, and it possesses numerous characteristics that make it one of the most complex languages in the world. It is more complex than Latin, Greek, and even Arabic. Your point about the need for further study is valid. However, Hebrew cannot be the mother of the Arabic language because Arabic is more complex, has a richer vocabulary, and its phonetic range is more diverse. I personally prefer to use the term "Aruvic languages" or "ancient Arabic language" instead of "Semitic languages" or "Proto-Semitic language" because the term "Sam" (Shem) is not mentioned in Islamic sources but is found in biblical sources, which we do not recognize as they are considered altered and corrupted. I do not deny that Standard Arabic has evolved over time, with the addition of the definite article "al," conjunctions, interrogative particles, and so forth. There are similarities between Semitic languages and Indo-European languages that warrant examination. It cannot be simply said that the similarities in vocabulary are merely due to borrowing because the contact between these languages was limited. It is likely that these words had a common origin. For example, there are limited similarities in vocabulary and grammar: The word "أُم" (mother) shares similarities with "mater" in Latin and "mother" in English. The Greek future marker "Θα" in "Θα γράψω" (tha grapso)(I will write) is similar to the Arabic future marker "س" in "سأكتب" (sa aktubu). The Greek word "Λογος" (logos) resembles the Arabic word "لغة" (language). "Κάλαμος" (kalamos) resembles "قلم" (pen). "φιλοσοφία" (philosophy) is similar to "فأل الصفا" (fa'al al-safa). "Στρατος" (stratos) resembles "الصراط" (al-sirat). Even in pronouns, "he," "heo," "hem" resemble the Arabic pronouns "هو" (huwa), "هي" (hiya), "هم" (hum). There are also morphological features and precise gender distinctions in both Aruvic languages and Indo-European languages that merit investigation. Specifically, between Arabic and Sanskrit, both languages contain a vast number of words and characteristics. As far as I know, Arabic has around 12 million words, and Sanskrit also has a large vocabulary. The video creator did not make a definitive claim but proposed a possibility. It's not necessary to accept it literally, but we should at least investigate the source of these similarities instead of dismissing them as mere coincidence. We should not deny the possibility of a deep connection between Aruvic languages and Indo-European languages.

[@livewithislam9818]

I want to speak and add in English. Regarding the word "Arabic" (العربية), its root is derived from "أعرب" which means "to clarify" or "to explain." Therefore, "اللغة العربية" means "the clear language." In contrast, "اللغة العجمية" refers to foreign languages, as they were not clear or understandable to Arabs. Interestingly, the same root "عَرَبَ" is present in the Somali language as "carab," which means "tongue," as the tongue is the organ of expression and eloquence. It is also intriguing that the Latin-origin words like "language," "linguistics," and "sublingual medication" share a connection with the Arabic word "لسان" (tongue). It's no coincidence that these words start with the letter "L"! Arabs translate "the language" to "اللسان" (lisaan)(the tongue). Or "اللغة" ( lugat ) ( language) For instance, ﴿بِلِسانٍ عَرَبِيٍّ مُبينٍ﴾ [الشعراء: ١٩٥] (195) In a clear Arabic language. - English Translation of qoran. "بلسان عربي مبين" means "in clear Arabic language." The word "linguistics" translates to "لغويات" or "لسانيات" in Arabic. لغويات (lugawiyáat) لسانيات ( lisaaniyáat ) "Sub-lingual" translates to "تحت اللسان" (under the tongue). It can be said derivative " ِسُفْل اللسان " safl lisaan " The letter F may change its sound because its origin is close to the letter B, as in many languages. Additionally, it's not far-fetched to consider that the word "لغة" (language) might be derived from "اللغو" which means "speech." Since the tongue is the organ of speech, it's plausible that its use expanded and evolved in other languages to mean "tongue."

[@juslostone]

No actually it is you who couldn't be any further from the truth and completely off the mark. You have not studied linguistics. And if you have you've inherited colonized ideologies. As he mentioned, Sanskrit is likely the progenitor of ty Indo-European languages and when they studied Sanskrit, JT came to the conclusion that it fell very short to being the mother language. One cannot just haphazardly say Hebrew because there is no Hebrew. Hebrew is Greek. Nobody spoke Hebrew. Hebrew was reinvented under the Islamic Golden Age. And to understand Hebrew even today they have to always refer to Arabic. This video does not even begin to scratch the surface of words you think just sounds similar. Pickles far far deeper than that and there are hundreds and hundreds of words have their origin in Arabic. And it definitely is not Greek because the Greeks admitted to borrowing writing and develop their language from The Phoenicians and this is also recorded with Herodotus. And if you know anything about the Phoenicians guess which lands they roamed?? All of the Arabic speaking lands specifically. The Igbo people of Africa are one of the oldest tribes in the world and they have linked themselves to the Middle East. Much of their language is Arabic and origin instead of using a CVC it is reversed vcv and relates back to Arabic. You my friend. Don't read enough and you are not going to get it from the imperialist who burned the books and rewrote history

[@perguto]

European languages might have gotten the word for sugar from Arab traders, but the Arabs themselves got it from the old Persians and the Persians from the Indians ( शर्करा • (śárkarā) in Sanskrit)

[@amanpalestina9664]

Maybe. But I think it goes further back into Mesopotamia~Indus Valley time.

[@Tomato_League]

This is a bit over the top in my opinion (im arab by the way), the reason of similarities could be that in the golden age of islam baghdad (the capital of iraq) was the place for science and everything was written in arabic back then so the students in every part in the world used to travel to baghdad and translate books to transfer the knowledge to their country, and over time they got affected by some vocabularies (not everything could be tranlated) and it develobed overtime to become actual words Similar to whats happening now in the arab world we use lots of english words in our daily speech because everything now in English and anyone who wants to get education he must know english and some of these words actually made it to the formal language like "Computer" = "كومبيوتر" (i know this isn't a good example)

[@mhmd.3rbi]

حاسوب حبيبي😅

[@Tomato_League]

@@mhmd.3rbi عارف ي حب بس انا مش فاكر كلمة تانية 😅 حاسب آلي او حاسوب او كمبيوتر

[@victoremman4639]

@@Tomato_League "Computer" = "كومبيوتر" is a very lazy translation, from ignorant of arabic. The arabic word should be مِعددة or مِقسمة . So the weird word كومبيوتر is not from any linguist.

[@Tomato_League]

@@victoremman4639 it has multiple translations like حاسوب ، حاسب آلي ، كمبيوتر (اسم أعجمي), I just didn't have a good example

[@victoremman4639]

@@Tomato_League Even what you propose in not accurate, because the translation you gave took the morphem -er of computeur as a Doer, so the alif in حاسوب . In latin languages we say Ordinateur, means Ordinate so root صفف could be another way to name Computer. If you considere a Computer in not an A doer, so the arabic prefix should be Mi-, a tool, not a Doer.

[@tatsuyakuragi3578]

40% of words that are used in my language today are either Arabic or from Arabic root. And not just similarity, they are literally same words. Also, we're only counting ones used in modern days not the whole 14 centuries.

[@Krassertyp7]

Subhan Allah, which Language?

[@somaliislamic2460]

​@@Krassertyp7 I think that is my language which is somali

[@starlonga]

Probably because your language is semitic, or spoken by people who are muslims, and have been for a long time. YOUR CLAIM PROVES NOTHING!!! The claims presented in this video are OUTLANDISH and not backed up by ANY sources.

[@jk-gb4et]

Maltese?

[@ladtm]

I'm gonna guess Turkish

[@liamheins]

Arabic has had a huge influence on the vocabulary of many languages around the world, but this video is highly misleading in promoting a pseudoscientific hypothesis on the origin of Indo-European languages that is not based in sound historical linguistic methodology. I encourage anyone watching to read up on the vast world of historical linguistics and the comparative methods that allow us to reconstruct the relationships between languages. Nationalist and religious movements have a long history of promoting their favored language as the origin of all others, but you are missing out on the fruits of an incredibly interesting field if you elevate these "theories" to the same level of centuries of critical, evidence-based investigation. The truth is so much more interesting, I promise.

[@ultrainstinct6715]

You're being pressed over nothing. He obviously didn't mean that Latin exists thanks to Arabic but that Arabic was the origin of most of the Latin words.

[@liamheins]

@@ultrainstinct6715 Did you watch the video? He explicitly claimed that Latin/English/etc are derived from Arabic, which is not true because they are from completely different language families (Indo-European and Afroasiatic). And it is not true that most of the words in Latin are from Arabic. He cites some examples of words with similar meanings between these languages (which you will be able to find between any languages with large vocabularies) but doesn't actually provide etymologies for those words. For instance the first three Latin verbs he lists (rego, curro, dico) as coming from Arabic are from Proto-Indo-European roots and have cognates in languages like Sanskrit and Tocharian.

[@nureke-dp1nw]

Although Arabic is a very beautiful and rich ancient language, especially Quranic Arabic, which has influenced many other languages, it couldn't be the case that all other languages originated somehow from Arabic, because the Arabic language can't be older than the prophet Ibrahim or Ismail pbut and from modern historical science we know that these prophets lived approximately 5000 - 5500 years ago. Moreover, even when the prophet Ibrahim left Mesopotamia (Iraq) for Palestine, he spoke the language of his fathers, the Mesopotamian language, which is different from ancient Arabic of the times of prophet Muhammad pbuh or ancient Hebrew of the prophets Musah and Harun pbut.

[@neohybridkai]

Yes I also believe that the origin of language is far older than Arabic and it may no longer exists now, and that doesn't lower my respect toward Arabic as the language of Qur'an

[@someone_7233]

No Who told you arabic is not ancient or that it didnt exist before the time of ismail peace be upon him? Jarham , the first arabic *tribe* to live in makka , after asking permission from hajar , the mother ismail himself , jarham was speaking arabic (an ancient way of arabic that died eventually) and ismail learned it from them Also , there was Thamod and A'ad (with the mighty city of Erum), two great people of arabia who existed well before ibrahim ,Erum itself was mentioned by Phoenicians almost 10 thousands years ago , theyre known btween arabs as the "arab bae'dah" or extinct arabs, theyre the forefathers of arab civilization and theyre ethnic arab Fyi , arabs are divided into 2 categories, 3 are subcategories: 1)arab ba'edah or "extinct arabs" (extinct arab tribes like A'ad, Thamod, and the nabatians).... 2)arab arebah or "arab arabs" (the arab tribes who still live to this day and age, those who can trace their lineage back to known ancient arab tribes) those too are ethnic arabs who the language was born in their communities and civilization 2) arab musta'arebah or "arabnized arabs" the arabs that werent ethnic arabs but their mother language is arab, like alot of people in north africa or some minorities in different areas around the arab world ... Being an ethnic arab or an arabnized arab doesnt really make a difference tho , scholars argue that if your mother tongue is arabic , then youre an arab , regardless of your lineage

[@nureke-dp1nw]

@@someone_7233 as far as I know Arabs consider themselves as descendants of prophet Ismail pbuh and his twelve sons. If so, how could his ancestors be Arabs and speak Arabic? Those ancient nations you mentioned were not Arabs, but nations who lived in the Arabic peninsula or in the Middle East. Maybe their languages were close to later Arabic, but those languages were not Arabic. Don't be like Jews who claim that prophets Ibrahim, Nuh, and Adam pbut were Jews and spoke Hebrew. Probably, all Sematic languages originated from the language of Mesopotamia, where prophet Ibrahim pbuh was born and grew up.

[@flowerinkplant]

As far as i know, Ibrahim was praying in Quran " i settle my offspring in the uncultivated valley, close to your sacred house, ... Make people's hearts turn to them." This means there was tribe live near that Area, that was the Arab Musta'ribah

[@nureke-dp1nw]

@@flowerinkplant it doesn’t mean it was a tribe there. Prophet Ismail’s mother couldn’t find any water in the area for a while and ran between the tops of two hills Safa and Marua to see if there any water sources in the area, while the baby was crying. At that time, prophet Ibrahim pbuh had already moved to the modern Palestinian land from modern Iraqi land, and he was quite old. When his second son, prophet Ishaq (Isaak) was born, he was too old.

[@Dr_Holiday]

I'm not an Arab, but subhanallah arabic is the greatest language in the world, I mean God the almighty picked it for the final revelation.

[@FactsWithActs]

​@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhIt is literally the richest language in the world, cry

[@youarethecssformyhtml]

​@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh🤡

[@zeirabalhabob7458]

​@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhjust because you don't understand it and find it hard doesn't mean it's the same for everyone, it is the richest language in the world that's a fact and it's very easy to speak, and it's the language of the Holy Qur'an and what People will speak in heaven insha'Allah... Indeed it's a superior language above others!

[@africankidd3642]

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhIt’s the richest language definitely. English is dry and full of stolen words. Guess what language is the original of most of the stars in the sky’s names.. Many Arabic texts cannot be translated to weak English. And the script is its own art.

[@larsapher]

@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh came together with Arabic... when Greek girls wanted Egyptian property on the Nile and the only way to get it was to industrialize conflict... the original sin of property ownership

[@huntereden6011]

If Arabic was the original language that all others derived from, this video should hold true for ALL languages. Instead, it only applies to languages whose speakers historically had contact with Arabs. But this doesn't apply to others like Native American languages, or the languages of the far east like Korean and Japanese. A much better explanation is that the observations in the video are a result of a mix of cultural exchange and coincidence.

[@manssurmedia]

akhi sorry, but with this video you have made too many wrong implications that were baseless, for example when you said harbour came from arabic huna burj, or tall from arabic tal. If you look at their actual etymologies they are completely unrelated and come from complete distinct roots. I do not want to conter the fact that arabic is the best and chosen language, but you do not help showing it by using such inaccuracies

[@africankidd3642]

But you do know that most languages have atleast a little Arabic influence you know. For example in English: Algebra or Alcohol or in many Indonesian languages: Musibat. Spanish: Camisa and the article “El” etc

[@manssurmedia]

@@africankidd3642 Of course I know that there are words that came from arabic to other languages, the same as words from other languages came into other languages and arabic as well, but that’s not what he talked about. He theorized about arabic being somehow the root for all languages and used completely wrong assumptions and implications.

[@viperapps2114]

I checked harbour and it's exactly as he explained no need to comment without actual knowledge

[@_Cura]

Akhi sorry, but with this comment you have made too many wrong implications that were baseless. For example, you say that our dear brother made: “TOO many bad implications” when you only cite 2 of these bad implications, out of the more than 60 examples of words cited in the video. Furthermore, you say that the words Harbor and Tall do not come from the words Hunan Burj and Tal, and that in reality these words have completely different roots, you don't even mention which roots are different and don't even mention where did this information come from, what are your sources, what book did you get this information from? Finally, you seem to ignore all the arguments used in this video to justify these reflections (such as the historical facts with the Turkish texts which have changed over time, passing to the origin of Arabic, or the origin of word harbour with the invasions of the United Kingdom by the Vikings, which supported the fact that harbour came from hunan burj, or the fact that Arabic has more than 16,000 roots while other languages ​​have 20 at 8 times less, or the interpretation of certain verses of the Qur'An or the names of Adam, his wives and his children which have letters exclusive to the Arabic language and so on etc...) While you don't cite any arguments.

[@_Cura]

​@@viperapps2114 Fact

[@stevesmith4901]

I googled the author of the book you cited and found nothing on him. Who is this genius T.A. Ismail who claims Arabic is not just the origin of the Semitic family of languages but also source of Indo-European family of languages. This is the dumbest thing I've heard.

[@alithefrog]

This video is definitely dumb but there some features in both Indo-European and Semitic that a common ancestor (definitely not Arabic)may explain tham but there is other explanations such as these ancient people lived closely to each other so they linguistically influence eachother

[@unquestionabletv]

Bro what? Arabic is like 3000 years old only, and modern Homo sapiens are like 250,000 years old.

[@DinoBryce]

They don't believe in evolution

[@Muslim-is6yo]

Homo sapiens ?

[@ThePreparedMuslim]

​@@Muslim-is6yohe thinks we came from monkeys.

[@U-A-FTAUTTPTAYFGAATZNTTPTUTTD]

​@@Muslim-is6yo Humans.

[@elmisticco]

*As linguist in both languages with native mastery, I gotta tell you the examples of the similar words is shocking and in no way mere coincidence. If as far away geographically German and Indian languages were decided by scholars to be related under the Indio-European language because they share similar root words, I don’t understand why Arabic, Latin or Anglo-Saxon can’t be related when they’re relatively closer geographically? There should be a new family of languages called Semito-European or Arabico-European. The only issue you have in this video is that you injected it with religion near the end. You should’ve kept religion out as that can create a controversy.😉*

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

"[Proto-Indo-European] is hypothesized to have been spoken as a single language from approximately 4500 BCE to 2500 BCE [...] though estimates vary by more than a thousand years. Wikipedia Languages evolve so fast that no language spoken at the time of classical Arabic could have remained similar enough to be considered the same language since proto-Indo-European began to be spoken.

[@MAbuRowais]

You never know.

[@egs3470]

@@MAbuRowais Yes, we know, lol. You can look at the historical record, ancient inscriptions, old texts, and see how different the language used was from the one we have today.

[@yessbbb]

​@@egs3470 the oldest thing written found on earth was a writing on a stone in Sinai in a mine, dated i think 5000BC. When it reads, it is in arabic, but the writing is different than today alphabet.

[@someofmyvideos774]

Wildly inaccurate video with loads of mistakes. Very odd for this channel. European languages are indo-European and have practically no linguistic relation to Semitic languages like Arabic, beyond the existence of loan words. Also a language can have a significant percentage of words that are loan words from an unrelated language. Persian and Arabic are COMPLETELY different languages with different roots but Persian has a ton of Arabic loan words. “Tall” to choose *just one example* from this video comes from proto-Germanic Talez not an Arabic word. PS: if there was a connection between Arabic and Latin (and there isn’t) it would be the other way round as Greek and Roman culture had a huge influence on the northern Arabs . eg. The Nabatean architecture in Jordan and Saudi Arabia is based on Roman architecture but built by Arabs. Also before the arbs had their own alphabet they used other alphabets including the Greek alphabet. To suggest pre-Islamic Arabs influenced Latin makes no sense.

[@jaketwigg1065]

Nah dude, Arabic is ancient, more ancient than other languages. Truth hurts.

[@someofmyvideos774]

@@jaketwigg1065 Arabs as an identifiable group are at least 3000 years old ( based on Sumerian inscriptions). However the Arabic they spoke in all likelihood would have been quite different. Arabic became standardized on what we call Fus-ha with the advent of the A) Arabic script a century or so before Islam and B) the Quran. None of this lends any support to the ridiculous notion in the video. Many languages have Arabic loan words ( Farsi, Hindi, Urdu, Pashtu, Spanish, Portuguese, English ) but the claims of Germanic languages being Arabic in origin is just silly with no evidence to support that claim beyond “the current word in English sounds similar to the current word in Arabic “

[@n_dns]

@@jaketwigg1065 Arabic is not the most ancient language. Arabic descends from Proto-Semitic, which then descends from Proto-Afro Asiatic. There is no language that is identifiable as the first on earth.

[@alyaly2355]

I am an Arab, and a Muslim. No, Arabic is not the original language. Sure, Arabic is old, very old. But, it’s not the original language because it didn’t give rise to Indo-European languages, Sinitic languages, Navajo, Bantu etc. All of these are either loanwords or words that just so happened to sound similar. The harbour examples annoys me a lot because harbour comes from the Proto-Germanic words, harjaz ( army ) and bergō ( protection ) and it isn’t related to Arabic at all. The Arabic word سكر has no root, as it’s not a native Arabic word. It was borrowed from Sanskrit. Other words like موز and فيل also aren’t native to Arabic at all!

[@blackroc_Cook]

من قال ان الفيل منقول من السنسكريتية لما ليس العكس؟

[@blackroc_Cook]

الموز banana اشتقت من البنان بنان الموز

[@alyaly2355]

@@blackroc_Cook كلمة فيل من اللغة الفارسية

[@alyaly2355]

@@blackroc_Cook لكن كلمة موز ليست عربية بالمن لغة في بابوا غينيا الجديدة

[@blackroc_Cook]

اوكي @@alyaly2355

[@drunklittlesheep]

English had over 1 million words. Max 3000 of those come from Arabic. This proves Arabic is the source of English. /s /s /s

[@abdulm2099]

@Arabic 101 This is a very flawed claim: Three major problems: 1. having more root words does not make a language the source of another language with lesser roots.. a language that has been influenced by multiple other languages will also have many roots and often those roots have similar meaning, example; English being influenced by Romance (latin) and Germanic (anglo-saxon) has more roots than either. 2. Why no mention of years, places and time periods when discussing language history (etmology) the oldest evidence of the existence of arabic is not much before Islam.. Arabic belongs to the Semitic group of languages of which Aramaic and Hebrew are much older. Semitic languages themselves belong to Afro-Asiatic languages which are much older and have been the origin for many languages across Africa. 3. The words with similarity to english have developed less than two thousand years back and mainly after the Islamic conquests and via Arab traders. If Arabic is the origin of these languages why are there no words before these influencing events??

[@DinoBryce]

In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects. (I know I have commented this like 10 times but it's still important)

[@dreamer6432]

The oldest evidence of Arabic/Arabs are the Aad and Thamud

[@honesty_provides_tranquility]

30% of Urdu is Arabic … it truly elevates the Hindi into a beautiful poetic language

[@IDKWhat0]

30% Persian AND Arabic, more common words are often from Persian because Arabic words are from Persian, not directly Arabic

[@SabeerAbdulla]

Urdu is much older than Hindi and Hindi borrows a lot from Urdu.

[@xandercage6944]

The standardized form of Urdu is older than the standardized form of Hindi.

[@blackroc_Cook]

@@IDKWhat0 Bassam Al-Rabiah, professor of Persian literature at King Saud University, contributed that “The Persian Language Academy in Tehran confirms that the Arabic language constitutes about 60% of the vocabulary of the Persian language.”

[@blackroc_Cook]

@@IDKWhat0 There has been a literary and cultural exchange between Persians and Arabs since pre-Islamic times, but for every foreign Persian word there is an Arabic word that corresponds to it in meaning, and there is not a single foreign Persian word in the Qur’an.

[@reemaboobaid5497]

سبحان الله ، اللغة العربية هي اغنى واثرى لغة في العالم ، في الماضي وفي الحاضر. سبحان من اختارها لكي تكون لغة الوحي والرسالة الاخيرة لبني آدم

[@darkprince6953]

in reality the video is literally him fanboying over arabic the claims are terribly wrong and contradict previous claim+ any linguist will find the video laughable

[@seamasmacliam1898]

1:44 So, we use "rego", the 1st person singular present active indicative of the verb so that we can have something similiar to و , even though -o is the same ending on every verb in that form, but then we use "dicere", the present active infinitive, just to have something similar to the ر , even though -re is the same ending on every verb in that form....? Cherry-picking indeed. We could make the same video arguing for Latin, Greek, Hebrew, Egyptian, Sumerian, Sanskrit, or any Classical language.

[@awonisgreat9708]

Lol using this guy’s logic you could very easily make an argument for Arabic descending from Greek or Latin considering the amount of words Arabic has loaned from them. The sophistry in this video is crazy lmao

[@yasinozt40]

As a muslim (who is orthodox, studying the religion and tries to practice it completely), i can assure you that this is one of the worst takes ever, completely psuede-academically, totally lacking any root in the science of language etc. Its totally flawed and has zero sound evidences. Don’t fall for this, only listen to this account for good teachings in Arabic and Quran reading (tajweed).

[@LoveAndPeace2004]

Most probably dude is a fan of baathist party

[@TheLuckylandShow]

Indonesian has a lot of loan words from Arabic. Even the names of the days of the week

[@am3nnet]

With the exception of Sunday, it used to be called ahad, but nowadays commonly called Minggu

[@niggogado]

​@@am3nnet ahad. minggu is also another name. both are applicable

[@arizuanprinceleece]

yaa... bahasa indonesia/& Melayu banyak pinjaman daripada bahasa arab... Minggu pinjaman daripada bahasa Portugis - Domingo... mcm itu lah... 🫡🫡🫡

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

Latin and Arabic belong to two completely different language groups; Indoeuropean and Semitic, respectively.

[@ErenAlpErtem]

you mean afroasiatic?

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

@@ErenAlpErtem Yes. Semitic is a subgroup within the Afroasiatic language family. I found out after posting and wrote some comments about it.

[@Satoshi-yd7lj]

Proto Latin and proto Semetic shared the same root, as do all languages on their timelines. This theory is wrong, however. Islamic history even accounts for the development of Arabic from proto-Semetic by naming a man y3rob يعرب as the first to speak Arabic, descended from Qahtan who was the origin of the Arab ethnicity within Semetic peoples. Just as it accounted for how languages developed over time, Islamic history here also accounts for how ethnicities as social structures arise over time. The lineage of the prophet Muhammad for example is مستغرب meaning Arabized since the paternal lineage of the Quraysh is traced to Ismaiil, who was from the loins of Abraham and settled among the Arabs becoming Arabized. Arabic has certainly changed less over time because of the Quran and the cultural value of eloquence pre-Islam prepared the language as a medium for revalation. The ayah that he mentioned where Adam was taught all names, which then became the basis for all languages is most correct. Allahu 'Alam

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

@@Satoshi-yd7lj Latin is Indoeuropean. The common origin of the Indoeuropean goes back around 6000 years (+-). Arabic probably didn't exist back then. Semitic is a sub-group within the Afroasiatic languages.

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

@@Satoshi-yd7lj Languages change so fast that shared origins of major families beyond several thousand years is difficult or impossible to determine from similarities, because some similarities could be entirely coincidental.

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

"From the very beginning of Indo-European studies, there have been attempts to link the Indo-European languages genealogically to other languages and language families. However, these theories remain highly controversial, and most specialists in Indo-European linguistics are skeptical or agnostic about such proposals." Wikipedia

[@loukmaneibrahim5028]

may ALLAH reward you❤

[@Krassertyp7]

Ameen

[@zaikaplates]

Ameen

[@treelight1707]

While 70% similarity is significant, it doesn't necessarily imply that anglo-saxon or latin originated from Arabic. It could just be that both share a common ancestor. Same with Adam's language. Albeit, Arabic might be closer to that original language than anglo-saxon, given the age. In ancient Egypt the name of the first woman translates to: she who lives, which is the literal translation of the word "Hawa'a" in Arabic. Hebrew and Arabic sharing the same ancestor, is also another clue, for a proto-semitic language, from which Indo-European languages could've branched.

[@amanpalestina9664]

Nice input. Anyway Arab only existed after the Ishmael era. The language may travel through here from Abraham, from Mesopotamia~Indus Valley

[@lordfelgrand4559]

"thats just a theory, a language theory"

[@darkprince6953]

bro trying to take mat pat's niche

[@shoaibahmed5635]

Undoubtedly you are one of the greatest scholar of classical Arabic language

[@Overfloater777]

بعشق دروسك الماتِعة. زادك الله علماً ونفع بك.

[@chrissy4957]

as someone who speaks a sinitic language, I don’t think arabic has influenced it much, but southeastasian languages all have had similar influences from sinitic languages. sometimes abrahamic religious people tend to have a euroasian perspective on the world and forget that there’s more to just that part of the world. but I love arabic and it was still a nice video to watch :)

[@DinoBryce]

In the video he neglects that fact that Arabic is a member of the Afro-Asiatic Indo Arabian language family. This means that it is a Semitic Language related to Hebrew and Syriac languages. This part of the map was a crossway for the world, affecting many African, Central/South Asian and European languages. However, this language has pretty much no affect on Sino Asiatic Languages such as Chinese and couldn't of spread to North America. Additionally, comprehensible Arabic is not older that 1500 years old, after Islamic influence "unified" its dialects. (I speak Zulu and Chinese besides English so I can confirm)

[@chrissy4957]

@@DinoBryce well said! and wow so happy to hear that you speak chinese besides english and zulu 🥹🙏 that’s very cool

[@bazah23]

I’m an Iraqi Arab and I don’t think Arabic is the source of all languages cus Arabic isn’t even the oldest Semitic language Akkadian is the oldest one and all Semitic languages came from a proto Semitic language that Noah and his sons spoke

[@larsapher]

I was watching a young autistic boy in the Muslim faith who was raised watching and reading the Quran.. now he is a master of the Quran he might still ? Display autistic tendencies...but he is an excellent teacher on the Quran. I could not help but be fascinated over the fact that if everyone in the world was given a Quran to learn in their own language as well as in Arabic we could all learn the same language based on our knowledge of the same words. On top of this the Arabic language or the Quran look like sheet music have specific tones and amounts of specific beats to be enunciated. What a beautiful learning experience school could be if you learn the Quran and then went to music and then went to science or art or anything else that you had to do how you would embace everything in the language of God. SUBHANALLAH

[@youarethecssformyhtml]

Musical instruments are Haram by the way

[@larsapher]

@@youarethecssformyhtml that would go for the voice also.. from what I've read it said that as long as the music is upright and righteous it is okay

[@بن_عبد_الرحمن]

​@larsapher , الس لا ام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركته. The hadith is clear in prohibition of musical instruments in general without any specification about truthfulness or piety of the music they are used for. Also the narrations from sahabah regarding the Quranic verse are clear. Also the speech of people of knowledge states the same fact, that musical instruments and music are prohobited. And some big scholars of madhahib even said that to say, that music is halal - is a disbelief. And Allah knows best. May allah bless you, my brother. Be aware of such sources that make it permissible to listen to any music. [There is only one exception for one specific musical instrument in one specific situation]

[@larsapher]

@ibn_abdirrahman what I did find was conflicting because it said that drums were considered okay tambourines were considered okay violin was considered okay if appropriate and pleasurable music as long as it was righteous and upright and not against the morals which much music in the west is negative and derogatory that is easy to see why it is around celebratory music I'm very vague .I will guess God will forgive us for dancing and enjoying music if we ask for it🙏🏿inshallah

[@eslamwaleed6301]

Great effort! Hope you talk more about the origins of languages and the 10 Qira'at.

[@FactsWithActs]

​@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhYou haven't proven that they are lies with your theory

[@AceLegend-vv5ty]

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh Ye he said so many lies for examples: ... what lies, kid? bet u keep crying cuz he has no proo- nvm, maybe cuz it is stup- nvm, ur just crying because it has a link to Islam bro, man up and be Muslim.

[@starlonga]

@@AceLegend-vv5tythe claims in this video are OUTLANDISH. Look up the etymologies of the words in the video. Harbour is a germanic word-claiming that it’s related to Arabic is madness. Look it up yourself!!!!!!!!!

[@User_00128]

He did say that tho and he also went further back to its origin. Do your own research man.

[@AceLegend-vv5ty]

@@starlonga i cant see what my original comment said so i am unsure what ur talking about due to my poor memory but it is still a theory with some claims and facts but u don't have to accept it.

[@MaskedGuyCh]

Subhan Allah. The Arabic language has always been one of the richest, if not the richest language in the world.

[@MaskedGuyCh]

@@maktabati_ The One who decides what is haram or halal is Allah (S.W.T), His messenger, and the people of knowledge (high scholars of Islam), not some random user on youtube. Also my avatar is not from an anime. Delete your comment.

[@eslamalahmadi]

Arabic was the only way supposed to be the ship able to carry greatness of holly Quran

[@LyingOstrich]

🤦‍♂️ No. That goes against the words of the Qur’an. It states that it was revealed in Arabic because that was the language spoken by the people of the Prophet. Had the Prophet been from France (for instance), the Qur’an would have been in French.

[@ahmedharajli189]

No?

[@imadmezigheche4414]

​@@LyingOstrichit's hard to believe your claims with a username like yours, besides where's your evidence from the Quran to back up your statement, think before you talk, that's if you're a real person and not just another fake account.

[@LyingOstrich]

@@imadmezigheche4414 The fact that you actually think I’m untruthful just because the word “lying” is in my handle speaks volumes about how stupid you are. Anyways, here are the ayats that support my claim: 14 : 4 44 : 58 12 : 2 41 : 44

[@lightscameras4166]

@@imadmezigheche4414Brother, what you just said is just an ad hominem insult. You are attacking his name instead of the argument. What he said is true. Of course, Arabic is indeed a beautiful, precise and eloquent language which can express far more clearly than English or French for example. But the other main reason the Quran was revealed in Arabic was because the people of Mecca spoke Arabic. That’s it. There is lots of proof for that, you just have to open the Quran. I’ll give you one example: “And thus we have revealed to you an Arabic Quran that you may warn the Mother of Cities [Mecca] and those around it and warn of the Day of Assembly, about which there is no doubt. A party will be in Paradise and a party in the Blaze.” Surat Al-Shura, Verse 7. There are many other examples like this

[@kotoshiseiko2938]

1. If Arabic was the starter language, you would have to prove its historical presence of Arabic in languages like Nahuatl, Mayan or just any aboriginal language in Australia. 2. Just because Arabic has a lot of words and has been influencal in coining new terms for new things, doesn't make it historically any more original than any other language. 3. Arabic has been in change for a very long time. Ever since prophet (SAWS) lived to this day and way before he (SAWS) was born. We might not have a name for the language of Adam, but that is all we don't have, a name. It wasn't Arabic, nor was it anything else currently in the world. Language evolution doesn't work like that. Language change from one form to many and even more. Dialects became their own languages and so on. (This has nothing to do with the Qur'an, by the way, because that was written in Classical Arabic, and hasn't changed since...)

[@ayaeldakhly4067]

Thank you for mentioning the resources. Please keep us informed about your resources in every video so we learn more from them

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

Arabic belongs to the Semitic language group which again belongs to the Afroasiatic languages. Semitic probably spread out of Africa. "An origin [of proto-Afroasiatic] somewhere on the African continent has broad scholarly support,[65] and is seen as being well-supported by the linguistic data.[96] Most scholars more narrowly place the homeland near the geographic center of its present distribution,[18] "in the southeastern Sahara or adjacent Horn of Africa."[97] The Afroasiatic languages spoken in Africa are not more closely related to each other than they are to Semitic, as one would expect if only Semitic had remained in an West Asian homeland while all other branches had spread from there.[98] Likewise, all Semitic languages are fairly similar to each other, whereas the African branches of Afroasiatic are very diverse; this suggests the rapid spread of Semitic out of Africa.[65] Proponents of an origin of Afroasiatic within Africa assume the proto-language to have been spoken by pre-Neolithic hunter-gatherers,[92] arguing that there is no evidence of words in Proto-Afroasiatic related to agriculture or animal husbandry." Wikipedia, 'Afroasiatic languages'

[@azur9773]

This is based on the myth of evolution, no point in arguing with this, Muslims don't believe in it. Etymology is often based on assumption, and this video may or may not have gotten things right, but the fact Arabic either influenced or is the origin for many words in other languages is undeniable in any case.

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

​@@azur9773Languages change over time. That's not a myth.

[@azur9773]

@@anderslvolljohansen1556 Yes, languages do, but what you posted, I assume is based on the "out of Africa" theory. This is what I meant.

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

@@azur9773 No, genetic evidence points to human populations emigrating from Africa over ten times further back in time than when the Afro-Asiatic language entered Arabia.

[@azur9773]

@@anderslvolljohansen1556 watch the series "The Journey of Certainty" by dr Eyad Qunaibi

[@Baummann1]

Arabic and Latin alphabets both stem from the Phoenician alphabet. With the amount of English spoken in so many languages around the world, therefore we can conclude English is the source of all languages. Is the person who made this video mentally ill?

[@anonymous-cf6tu]

English isn't the mother/original source of all languages, English wasn't created before Phoenician, Arabic nor greek, actually. I forgot what is the original language or first recorded language in ge history. (maybe the sumerian, Babylonian, or others)

[@ibr7780m]

When you try to learn the Arabic language, do not say that I am learning it because it is beautiful, but say that I am learning it to bring it closer to Allah and bring it closer to my God This is what we call Arabic "Alneaa" I intend to do something When you intend to do something, say that I intended it for Alkreem Intention is better than action

[@darkprince6953]

god is equally close to everyone most prophets weren't arab yet he is so close to them a person loving god is close to him no matter what they speak

[@ibr7780m]

@@darkprince6953 God is close to the living, yes But there is a difference between when Allah is close and makes you do what he command, and when Allah is close but does not make you see His religion as the correct one When a person is very far from Allah, he will see death as something far away Or perhaps he sees the world as black according to his way of thinking and his own devil He commits suicide and kills the greatest body created from dust And All greatness belongs to Allah There is an Arab who reads the Qur’an all his life and does not understand it There is someone on the other side of the planet who reads it and understands it better than the Arabs This is because God does not look at faces, but looks at hearts There are those who love God with their tongue only There are those who say there is no god but God, and no one influence him, he still a Muslim God was merciful even to the infidels ourselves is our thoughts If we control ourselves And if we challenge ourselves We will not lose God sees ourselves and our thoughts and sees if we are fighting for Him Don't look at people's daughters We don't enjoy bullying and hurting people We don't act like heroes when we say bad words When we pray, we do not tell everyone that we are the people of God God created us and no one else I hope I have no mistakes in English May God protect you, my brother, wherever you are If you visit Iraq, you are a crown on our heads. We hope that you will visit Karbala If I made mistakes in my speech, I apologize because I am a beginner in English🌱🌸🌸

[@darkprince6953]

@@ibr7780m thank you brother may God guid us all i agree with the amazing words you spoke

[@ibr7780m]

@@darkprince6953 Thank you, my brother. May God protect you from the tricks of Satan And forgive you and grant you success inshallah🤲 Respect for you to read all this brother🤝

[@darkprince6953]

@@ibr7780m amin for all of us

[@aq4356]

Guys please watch the video before jumping to conclusions lol, although not all of the information here is accurate, the channel doesn't claim Arabic is the original language, he just wanted to share a theory by a researcher. Many languages in the world have been proposed to be the "original" language.

[@calleha01]

yeah the theory is usually referred to as proto-world. meaning a reconstructed language that branches into all languages we have today. claiming that Arabic in its current standard form is the same language as proto-world makes little sense given the changes that all languages inevitably go through. Arabic, too, surely underwent many changes before and after its standardization. It could be argued that most word roots from proto-world were preserved and passed down in Arabic though, under the assumption that the proto-world theory is correct

[@Omroqurba]

all the information is actually accurate, please this neutral hate shit is out of season

[@calleha01]

The video is trying to claim all languages come from Arabic. Which makes no sense considering the fact that there must have been a language before Arabic. Each language has a specific time period; it is impossible to keep a language alive without changing it unless it is only kept alive as a written language (which is the case with both Fusha Arabic and Latin, for example). The time period for spoken Fusha Arabic is approx. 600-800 AD and if you count Old Arabic which is a different language(s) the time period goes back to maybe 900 BC. It is clear that the author has heavily studied Arabic and has a great deal of appreciation for the language, but it doesn't seem like he has studied Philology, which is needed to understand a topic such as this one. Word cognates are expected to be found across most languages in the world, whether all languages come from the same source or not. Trace back Arabic far enough, and you get Proto-Afro-Asiatic, which the "oldest" reconstructed language in the world, in other words the oldest language known to exist. Look into that language instead of saying "Arabic is the oldest language". Think about it, if every language comes from the same source, then it logically follows that EVERY language in the world is the oldest language. You guys haven't studied this and it really shows. Maybe read about it before taking some guy's personal fringe theory as truth. Islam never claims that Arabic is the original language of humanity btw. If you believe that every language came from the same source, then every language that exists today is some kind of dialect of that original language, including Arabic. This is no "neutral hate", this is Philology. Have any of you studied Philology?

[@aq4356]

@@Omroqurba there's mistakes in the video.

[@aq4356]

@@calleha01 good analysis on the proto world

[@victoremman4639]

The word MEAN came from semitic معنى. See deep explanation on "The english and its semitic origin arabeclassique forum actif". There is another proves that semitic is the older language, because arabic kept the archetyps and etymas : the etymas are archaic arab roots, and the archetyps are the phones of the abjad, each letter has a meaning. The issue doing etymology, it's that PIE languages had lost some phones and invented new ones, like the P for the arabic B or F, or the latin T which could by a ط or a ت like in Tall ط and Tell ت. You'll find in sha' Allah many ressource in the key words above. Surah 2.31

[@72-bit]

Wrong don’t do this

[@Bilal_Abu_Abdillah]

??

[@amadeusakreveusmusic3356]

10:24 There's a universal which is the names for parents, "Mother" and "Father" but most used a P or a B sound for father "Pater" while universally M for mother. "Um." and "Abb." in arabic.

[@nathanielmartins5930]

The kurdish word for mother is "Dayik"

[@calleha01]

Chichi and Haha in Japanese

[@nathanielmartins5930]

@@calleha01 Those are the "Dada" and "Mama" simplifications. Ka-san and Tou-san emphasise your point better.

[@calleha01]

@nathanielmartins5930 yeah but the point still stands. The most commonly used words for mom and dad sound vastly different. Otousan and okaasan are the words you use when addressing them; chichi and haha when you talk about them. At least that's how I learnt it.

[@Aresydatch]

Pseudo science, Hindus say Sanskrit is the origin of languages too. Both theories are not good

[@niccolopaganini1782]

Thank God, someone understands.

[@darkprince6953]

​@@عاشقاللّغةالعربية-ص7جthe one speaking emotionally is the host of this video

[@darkprince6953]

@@عاشقاللّغةالعربية-ص7ج yes which the host of the video provided non of it

[@Test-j5g]

Paj**eet

[@sosocute1134]

Although it feels like a stretch, I believe that Arabic has greatly impacted other languages due to the prolonged history of their dominance. Also, when we talk about language development, we should take into account that Arabic itself did not sound this way from the beginning of time. If you take a look at the languages trees we can actually trace when each language splits from the others. For instance Arabic, Hebrew and ancient egyptian all have a common ancestor language. Clearly shown by the shared sounds like خ and ح. On the other hand. Arabic was the language of the strongest people for a very long time thus, it influenced many words much how English is now the most important language and most new words come from english

[@ahfez]

I'm an asian learning arabic and this is true. I'm so impressed by how easy for me to learn Arabic since many of the word seems could be related to my own language.

[@jawijawijawi5047]

In Malay Arabic script we used to maintain some of the Arabic spelling ❤

[@ariapinandita9240]

Yups... Aksara Jawi... Modified Arabic script to write bahasa Melayu and several local languages in Indonesia...

[@khaledsabry5135]

Spectacular! Thank you so much for your efforts brother

[@SavciSV]

I love you and your content you helped me a lot Keep on❤️

[@SavciSV]

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh didn't understand, he lied in what??

[@yorunohikari4369]

​@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh If you're going to accuse him of lying, then give us a flip notes of the truth so we could search the rest.

[@Krassertyp7]

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubhhow did he lie????

[@FactsWithActs]

H​e didn't, that dude is just coping

[@SavciSV]

@@FactsWithActs copying from whom

[@anderslvolljohansen1556]

16505 is about 75 percent of the allowable combinations of two and three letters if there are 28 to choose from and the first can't be doubled but the second can. 28×27×28+28×27=21924 Assuming Alif, ا, can't be one of the root letters, but hamsa can. I'm also assuming that waw, و, and yaa, ي, can be root letters. That means any non-Arabic word with two or three consonants has a high probability of having consonants sounding similar to Arabic just by coincidence. Some combinations may be difficult to pronounce and therefore avoided across different languages, increasing the probability. I'm not an Arabic speaker, so take what wrote about the number of possible roots with a grain of salt. I also read there are some 4 and 5 root letter words, but that those are rare.

[@HarrySmart]

If you read the origin of language, a lot of words of modern language are borrowed from Arabic but Arabic is also derived from Aramaic. Arabic started to become popular in early 2nd Century AD. Let's stick to more scientific approach. Let's keep Quran separate from unsupported arguments. The language used in Quran and its stylometry is beyond human comprehension.

[@usayeed727]

Aramaic and Arabic both developed separately as part of the semitic language group- Arabic didn’t descend from Aramaic. However, I agree with the rest of what you said. Arabic isn’t the originator of all languages and no modern linguist Muslim or non Muslim would support that idea.

[@servantofthemerciful3511]

​@@usayeed727 what about the language of Ad and Samud the Original Arabs before Ismail Alaihisalam?

[@Abu7asan27]

Brother may Allah bless you and reward you the highest levels of paradise for the effort you put in teaching the Arabic tongue, and I especially love how you teach Arabic through The Glorious Quran.

[@ironwox]

Need more objective evidence. Sorry I have to be skeptical about this as being biased

[@LyingOstrich]

This video is factually incorrect.

[@Doubb7]

The Arabic language according to Islam is the language of Adam, peace be upon him. It became extinct and was revived by the Prophet Ishmael, peace be upon him. The Arabic language, according to Islam, is the language of the people of Paradise and the language of revelation in which every prophet received revelation and then translated it in the language of his people for his people. Also, the Arabic language is the richest language on earth. The only language that has influenced all the languages ​​of the world,It is also the language of Islam directed to the worlds

[@Islamis4all]

This brother has taught us a lot of things about the Quran Recitation and Arabic language that we didn’t know so he is our teacher and we should respect him and if he has made any mistakes in this video or tried to teach us some “facts” about the “superiority” of Arabic language over other languages and made some mistakes then we should point them out with proof with due respect to him. Thanks.

[@urielamauri7633]

I agree; Arabic is a unique and fascinating language just because of the facts we know beforehand (the most conservative Semitic language and still preserved today). However, the Arabic language cannot be used as a source to Indo-European languages; just the way they work when creating words (a root word system vs an agglutinating word system) are very different.

[@darkprince6953]

there no fact about a language superiority he made a very outlandish video he has a lot of baises and that very disrespectful to non arabs

[@Gio23.]

سُبْحـانَ اللهِ وَبِحَمْـدِهِ عَدَدَ خَلْـقِه، وَرِضـا نَفْسِـه، وَزِنَـةَ عَـرْشِـه، وَمِـدادَ كَلِمـاتِـه!🌟

[@ghst4487]

I am Muslim from somali but this video is full of misinformation arabic is not the original language please stop spreading lies

[@Junior-zd8ku]

Your profile is somali loser?

[@itzmoonlight4764]

YOU BLEW MY MIND YA AKHI!

[@العملالاجتهاد]

May Allah reward you! ❤💚🤍🌹

[@zaikaplates]

Ameen

[@DeviilReaper]

As an Arab, this is all bull. Anyone with any basic understinding of linguistics would reject this idea - not to mention the obviouse Arab supremasist in this video - it is laughable to think Latin, Greek, Anciant Egyption, Sumarian, Akkadian, Sanskrit, Numourious African, & Far Eastern languages that are older than Arabic are derived from Arabic.

[@irfanmauludin398]

Typhical of Semitic language included Arabic is every word have root, word سكر have no root on it, so it must borrowed from another language, it borrow from Sanskrit शर्कर (zarkara) and there are another 15 words for Sugar in Sanskrit, just advice you need learn Philology to understand all languages in the world, and there are also Sanskrit's words in AlQuran too, dont be Fanatic with Arabic language and finally make you blind, in Islam all Languages is Egality, no one language is superior than others and no one language is inferior than others, i am muslim too, open your mind and read alot of Literature bro 🤝🤝🤝🤝

[@zaksid3413]

Sanskrit is derived from Tamil! ( sarkarai = sugar in Tamil… the oldest language)

[@irfanmauludin398]

@@zaksid3413 no, Sanskrit still oldest i think, it has 16 words for Sugar, how about Tamil?

[@MAbuRowais]

The Quran is Arabic. The fact that some words in the Quran or names are not „originally“ Arabic does not make the Quran Inarabic. These words or names were known and used by the Arabs.

[@irfanmauludin398]

@@MAbuRowais which one I said that Quran is Inarabic? read slowly bro 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@egs3470]

@@zaksid3413 This is patently false, Dravidian languages have no relation to Sanskrit except loanwoards

[@nmsvic1507]

Well, this is Exactly the Problem, the fact that there’s no such a scientific theory doesn’t negate the claim or the fact that Arabic is the source of All language, The Arabian peninsula mountains and valleys full with different Arabic Writings styles and script pre date any of its ‘sisters lang’, the fact that these findings not been examined and the claim or standard use by University’s or modern linguistics to determine an origin etc of a language is merely suspicion and conjecture , Not forgetting bias towards Arabic For known reason, And to determine this claim veracity not only on linguistic basis but Also archeology And anthropology, its scientific to claim Arabic is the source of All language and pre date any other language.

[@UziiTube]

You should stick with Arabic lessons...

[@samantarmaxammadsaciid5156]

With this, what can kind of ᶜArabic is he teaching?!???!

[@Abid_Ibn_Ashraf]

Nope

[@zin8324]

Let him keep going

[@qpdb840]

Sugar سکر is a Indo-Iranian word that ended up influencing a Simitic language that developing into Arabic which modified it, then Arabic spreading the word. It’s called word distribution.

[@محمد-ر6غ4ذ]

Another example I've noticed in French: "We" in Arabic: نحن (nahnoo) "We" in French: nous (noo)

[@Krassertyp7]

Subhan Allah

[@starlonga]

Doesn't prove anything ... Use your brain ...

[@محمد-ر6غ4ذ]

@@starlonga I'm pointing out something that I found interesting. Don't worry, my brain function very well, Al-Hamdullilah.

[@starlonga]

@@محمد-ر6غ4ذ Okay Ma sha Allah

[@phoenixk4328]

​@@starlonga what a corny response

[@LinguaSitora]

Thank you from Uzbekistan.

[@Ash-qs4wk]

Absolutely amazing!!! خزاك الله خيرا

[@zeirabalhabob7458]

*جزاك*

[@personnperson]

هي تكتب جزاء الله خيرا يجب تصحيح الكلمة

[@Wenndi_RBLX]

No wonder Allah Almighty revealed the Noble Quran in Arabic. Subhanallah!

[@LyingOstrich]

The reason the Qur'an was revealed in Arabic was because the people of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) spoke it...

[@totot99]

Bro said fck linguistics. Here's some BS. I am actually so disappointed. I read the title and thought you were debunking it or something but apparently you believe this shi?

[@LoveAndPeace2004]

Nothing to wonder about, he is a baathist

[@teehee4096]

The oldest language we have record of is Sumerian, which is not even an Afroasiatic language, let alone a form of Arabic.

[@EnergeiaRhythmos]

These languages are semetic tho.(btw I completely disagree with that video)

[@abamqc]

Its not correct, yes Arabic or the semetic languages gave many words to other languages, but cling 70% 80 % are not correct and both do not come from the same family.

[@_Cura]

you're just being emotional instead of being rational, for 10+ minutes he gives these arguments. Instead of being emotional, respond to these arguments by refuting them. If you don't, you're just following your passions.

[@abamqc]

Most are wrong..For example the word Tall has its own origin tree..That takes it to a proto language and by those times there's no Arabic in existence but a proto Arabic language,.Just by similarity in words doesnt means they are related. If you go deep 90 % of these claims are wrong.

[@LazVoyLoL]

The proposition, however interesting, lacks foundation. Firstly, you should put the translations of each of the words into English next to them. You also forgot to include other Indo-European language families, such as the Balto-Slavic branch and Greek branch. I sincerely doubt you will find much similarity there. Thirdly, you should link each word to Arabic by showing us the whole chain, and at each step of the chain you should put a translation of the roots.

[@ujimajame4601]

Further proof can be found in the hadith of Abu Hurairah عنهاللرضي in which he narrated that the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه و سلم said: “When Allah created Adam, He breathed the soul into him, then he sneezed and said: ‘Alhamdulillah.’ So he praised Allah by His permission. Then His Lord said to him: ‘May Allah have mercy upon you O Adam. Go to those angels - to that gathering of them sitting - so say: 'As-Salamu alaikum.' They said 'Wa Alaikas-Salamu Wa Rahmatullah’. Then he returned to his Lord, He said: ‘This is your greeting and the greeting of your children among each other.’ Grade: Hasan (Darussalam) Reference : Jami` at-Tirmidhi 3367 In-book reference: Book 47, Hadith 420. English translation: Vol. 5, Book 44, Hadith 3367

[@ibnmadiyar03]

commenting to stay on islamic fyp

[@hikmatussalafiyyah]

follow me akhi

[@Krassertyp7]

Ya Akhi, I am not saying you are, but Wallahi be carful of showing off your good deeds

[@ibnmadiyar03]

@@Krassertyp7 in short, i copied this comment a while ago and pinned in a place where you copy and paste 1) when i comment, the islamic content is promoted more and gets more reach 2) the more i comment under islamic videos, the more islamic videos I receive in my FYP I truly believe that you wrote the comment with good intentions and I appreciate it, may Allah reward you Just writing to make it clear that it's not a "show off" move to impress people, but just my contribution to the islamic world and for myself

[@truthdisseminator]

brother = baradar in farsi = bhrata in bengali borg = borgo meaning fort in bengali = qala3a in arabic = alcala in Spanish mead = mod in bengali bog (God) in Serbian = bhog-oban in bengali God = khoda in farsi tripoli = tri (three) + polli (villages) in bengali tyre = teer meaning shore in bengali que meaning what in spanish = qui in bengali kuru in japanese = koro in bengali shinto in japanese = shindhu in bengali meaning sindh = hindu

[@urielamauri7633]

Bengali is an Indo-European language, this is why we share a lot of common vocabulary.

[@truthdisseminator]

@@urielamauri7633 It's also undeniable there are thousands of Arabic words in Bengali, as well.

[@SaeedNeamati]

can you please tell us the source for your claims about roots count?

[@muhammadelmezayin3135]

U didn't even watch the video man !

[@darkprince6953]

​@@muhammadelmezayin3135he literally did

[@farouksallak718]

You made a claim at 1:12 with percentages, but provided cherry-picked examples. Show us the process of how you collected all the known roots and how you compared it to the arabic.

[@Abu7asan27]

Fantastic video about the Arabic tongue perhaps being the original tongue of all languages. I'd like to add that not only Anglo-Saxon and Latin languages share roots with the Arabic tongue, I also noticed that Asian languages do too, for example, the Japanese language shares striking words with Arabic, like the word (sama) in Arabic, which means (sky, or something exalted or high) is the same word with a similar meaning in the Japanese language. Another example, the word (anta) in Arabic, which means (you) is the same in Japanese and has the same meaning, also, the word (yadd) in Arabic, which means (hand) is similar in pronunciation to the Japanese word (ude) which means (arm). I'm not a linguist but I have interest in the Arabic tongue and its relation to The Glorious Quran and other languages old and new, and I find it fascinating how numerous are the examples that point to The Arabic tongue being most likely the original tongue!

[@SomeofThisSomeofThat]

Factually your statement is illogical … there are literally languages and peoples more ancient than Arabic. Akkadian, Sumerian, Egyptian…and those three are only the languages with WRITTEN records. What we do know is that the first languages were spoken not written, so there are languages that are more ancient than the languages that are known to pre-date Arabic.

[@Abu7asan27]

My statement is not illogical because I did not say the Arabic tongue is for a fact the original tongue of all languages, rather I said it perhaps and most likely is, and I'd given examples that support what I'm saying even with hard to relate with languages, like Japanese! In addition, what you've stated doesn't prove anything, because -and I'm sure you know this- at any moment, archeological discoveries can prove that Arabic is in fact older than all the languages you've mentioned, also, as for now, it is a fact that the Arabic tongue is way richer than all the languages you've mentioned, thus the fact that such archeological samples exist does not prove that those languages were older than Arabic or that Arabic did not exist before them. I don't know if you're a Muslim or not, but as a Muslim myself, and with the concrete evidence that The Glorious Quran is factual and truthful, I am standing on solid ground when it comes to discussing such a topic, an even more solid ground than any academic studies and research. With good intentions, I invite you to study The Glorious Quran and the Arabic tongue, then I'm positive you'll notice the numerous observations that make the Arabic tongue a superior candidate for an original tongue, because at the end of the day, there has to be an original tongue that all languages came from either directly or indirectly.​@@SomeofThisSomeofThat

[@SomeofThisSomeofThat]

@@Abu7asan27 Again, your curiosity to consider whether Arabic is the oldest language is unfounded and quite literally makes no sense. Ill never understand why the world around white-washes or brown-washes human history when time after time after time all evidence points towards Sub-Saharan Africans being the first peoples. Maybe you should look to the original people and explore their languages. Then maybe you’ll find the original language…but you certainly wont find the answer from somebody whose bias is to prove Arabic as the “original” language. Arabic is an Afro-Semetic language particularly from the Semetic branch which is pre-dated by the Afro branch. The Afro branch found in the Horn of Africa is pre-dated by African languages the further south in Africa you travel. Khoisan languages with the clicks consonants are estimated to be 60,000 years old.

[@Yunus1049]

Wallah qasam! Only Allah Almighty can rewards you with dissemination of our deen along the globe 🌎 Masha Allah Tabarakallah 🙌🤲🙏

[@seadesertfox]

Thanks

[@therealhussein]

It's a really interesting theory but it's very tough to prove, even while being hypothetical

[@teddycabana]

Asalaamu alaykum everyone

[@Syria_Free_Palestine_will_too]

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته أخي الكريم

[@Krassertyp7]

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته

[@FactsWithActs]

وعليكم السلام

[@NormalMuslim7]

Alaikuma saluma warahmatullAhi wa barakatu

[@teddycabana]

@@NormalMuslim7 omg I love your cat 😭 I showed it to my brother and he laughed.. the hat & the sibha prayer beads ☺️🥹

[@gerardosagastume1960]

It's true, many words in Spanish came from Arabic : Café, azúcar , alcohol, aceite, albahaca, etc.

[@kc711]

Bro , false cognates. Stick to Arabic lessons , that's enough for you .

[@drunklittlesheep]

Even of some of his examples are right they are loan words not cognate. Because the Arabs did a lot of trade. And conquering and colonizing and empire building. Its like saying that becuase people all over the world say a version of hello when the answer the phone or that they call a phone something similar to the English word it means english is the source of all those languages. Obvious bunk.

[@sharifanamutebi7579]

Jazaak’Allaahu khaira brother for this invaluable insight 🎉

[@wb1847]

This is blowing my mind away honestly.... shocking

[@hikmatussalafiyyah]

@@NeelLLumi-AnCatDubh Yo're wasting time pulling hairs out for a KZbin video, he's getting his bag and you're not lol

[@wb1847]

I'm well aware of proto indian European, the possible reconstructions and proto semitic, and also the modern theory on these. But there's important and relevant claims, examples here. They need to be investigated and can't be accepted as is, but can't be dismissed either with research. For example, the claim on a large portion of the roots of Latin somehow matching those of Arabic needs a reference + more looking into

[@wb1847]

Just a note, Indo-Semitic is a real consideration though not mainstream.

[@Krassertyp7]

Really

[@starlonga]

Because it is not true, it’s armchair research, it’s made up, NO ONE believes this. A random guy made it up. Look up the etymologies of the words presented in this video, and see for yourself. This video is shockingly shallow.

[@Numeral0]

everytime I watch a new video about arabic language makes me love it even more, and I used to love english more even so arabic is my mother language

[@name3583]

Is this based on research?

[@drunklittlesheep]

No this is absolute bunk

[@mshwaar2]

But the Arabic language itself was taken from the Syriac language in Syria, so all these roots in languages come from the Syriac language. 🇸🇾

[@minecraftshiporama211]

Exactly, this is a well known fact

[@lutinajohn61]

I am not an Arab, but in Arabic, changing the vowels can significantly alter the meanings of words. For instance: The consonants K, F, R can create "kafir" (infidel), "kufr" (disbelief), and "kufar" (infidels). The consonants Q, R, A can lead to "iqra" (read), "qara'a" (he read), "qira'a" (recitation), and "quran" (even new meaning: the holy book). In contrast, in many other languages, changing vowels doesn't lead to new words: Changing the vowels in "cover" to 'civer,' 'cavir,' 'cuvar' doesn't create meaningful words. Similarly, altering "lamp" to 'lemp,' 'limp,' 'lomp' does not yield valid words either. So it is make sense Arabic is most richest language

[@sravasaksitam]

But does that mean Arabic is the ancestor of any language? No. That's not linguistically sound.

[@SabeerAbdulla]

​@@sravasaksitamthe probability of it being so increases drastically though

[@sravasaksitam]

@@SabeerAbdulla It doesn't at all. The origins of Arabic are understood. It's a semitic languages. There have been thousannds of languages before it and there will be thousands after.

[@mutated__donkey5840]

Because Semitic languages work like that. Germanic languages don’t.

[@JRTinMind]

In my opinion, when Allah teaches Adam 'all names' it might be 00... to 99... or AAA... to ZZZ... who knows. Allah know best. this just random things in my mind