Рет қаралды 9,822
Bal Krishna Das Agrawal v. Radha Devi and Others 1989 The court defined expert as a person who by his training has acquired the ability to express an opinion but an ordinary witness does not possess this quality.
Ramesh Chnadra Agarwal v. Regency Hospital Ltd. The court stated that first and foremost requirement for expert evidence to be admissible is that it is necessary to hear the expert evidence. The test is that the matter is outside the knowledge and experience of the layman.
Honorable Supreme Court has laid down in the case of State of Maharashtra v. Damus Gopinath Shinde 2000 that mere assertion in support of his opinion is not evidence, even if it comes from an expert. It is held that such evidence cannot be considered even if it is correct until and unless expert is examined.
Kabul Singh v. Gurinder Singh, it was held that opinion which is sought is only relevant and other information should be ignored.
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Jai Lal and others 1999 Honorable apex court explained the substance of expert opinion that section 45 which makes the opinion of experts admissible lays down, that when the court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law, or of science or art or as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions specially skilled in such foreign law, science or art or in question as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions are relevant facts.
In the case of Titli v. Jones 1934, it was held that the real function of the expert is to put before the court all the materials, together with reasons which induce him to come to the conclusion, so that the court, although not an expert, may form its own judgment by its own observations of those materials.
In the case of State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdeo Singh, 1992, the honorable Supreme Court opined that a court can act on the opinion of handwriting expert if two things are proved beyond any doubt, namely
(i) The genuineness of the specimen/admitted handwriting of the concerned accused and
(ii) The handwriting expert is a competent, reliable and dependable witness whose evidence inspires confidence.
For more videos, click on the links:
Notice under section 3 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882
• Notice || Transfer of ...
Doctrine of Estoppel
• Doctrine of Estoppel |...
Presumptions of Burden of Proof
• Presumptions of Burden...
Section 6 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Presumptions Under Indian Evidence Act, 1872
• Presumptions under Ind...
Presumptions Related to Documents
• Presumptions Related t...
Introduction to Transfer of Property Act
• Transfer of Property A...
Section 5 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882
• Secction 5 TPA 1882 ||...
Injunctions Chapter VII and VIII of Specific Relief Act,1963 and Order 39 Rule 1-5
• Chapter VII & VIII || ...
Section 20 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.
Section 17,18 and 19 of Specific Relief Act, 1963
• #sra #section17specifi...
Section 12, 13, 15 of Specific Relief Act, 1963
• #specificreliefact #sr...
For More videos click on the following links:
Section 188, 120B, 269, 270, 271 IPC, 1860
• #section188 #indianpen...
Section 511 IPC, 1860
• Section 511|| Chapter ...
Criminal Intimidation:
• Criminal Intimidation ...
Receiver
• Receiver || Order 40 |...
Forgery
• Forgery || Chapter XVI...
Criminal Trespass
• Criminal Trespass || S...
Suit by indigent
• Suits by Indigent Pers...
Counterclaim and set off
• #setoff #counterclaim ...
Free Consent & Capacity of Parties
• Free Consent || Capaci...
Burden of Proof
• Burden of Proof || Ind...
Public Nuisance
• Public Nuisance|| IPC ...
Bail under CPC
• Bail Under CrPC || Law...
Theft, Extortion, Robbery and Dacoity
• IPC Lecture || Theft |...
Private Defence
• Private Defence|| IPC ...
Offences Relating to Marriage: Chapter XX
Sections: 493-498
• Lecture on Offences Re...
Cruelty to a Married Woman; Section : 498A
• Lecture on Chapter XXA...
Learn about Defamation:
• #ipc #defamationlaws ...
Please do not forget to like, comment, subscribe, share and support. It matters to me a lot.
Thank You
With
Best Wishes!